Incorporating Office-Based Surgery Into Your Practice With WALANT

Carbon Footprint of Open Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery Performed in the Procedure Room Versus Operating Room Setting

PURPOSE

Environmental sustainability is an important issue in health care because of large amounts of greenhouse gases attributable to hospitals. The operating room has been highlighted as one of the highest contributors, prompting several initiatives by organizations focused on the care of hand and upper extremity conditions. This study aimed to quantify and compare the carbon footprint of a common hand surgery in two different surgical settings, the procedure room (PR) and operating room. We hypothesized that open carpal tunnel release (oCTR) will generate a greater environmental impact in the operating room than in the PR.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of oCTRs performed at a tertiary care medical center. Current procedural technology codes isolated a single cohort of patients who underwent bilateral oCTR, one side performed in the PR and the contralateral side in the operating room. Current published emission conversions were used to calculate carbon footprint at our institution based on energy expenditure necessary for the creation and disposal of waste and sterilization of surgical equipment. Surgery time was combined with heating, ventilation and air conditioning/lighting energy consumption to estimate facility emissions.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients had bilateral oCTR surgery performed in both settings. Open CTR performed in the operating room generated 3.7 kg more solid waste than when performed in the PR. In total, emissions from oCTR performed in the operating room generated 32.4 kg CO2, whereas oCTR in the PR emitted 13.0 kg CO2 per surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing a common hand procedure (oCTR) is more environmentally sustainable in the PR than in the operating room, with a 60% reduction in carbon footprint.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Greater effort should be made to perform surgery in the PR instead of the operating room in appropriately indicated patients. Surgical sets should be evaluated for the necessity of included equipment and unnecessary waste.

Intraosseous Treatment of Bone Marrow Lesions in the Knee: Surgical Technique

Intraosseous injections of bone marrow aspirate concentrate have shown promise in the treatment of bone marrow lesions (BMLs) in the knee. With the wide-awake limited anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique, intraosseous injections can be performed with the patient under local anesthesia in the procedure room or operating room setting. This article describes 2 techniques to access the BML of interest. The "decompression route" involves drilling through the nearest cortex, and the "biologic route" involves drilling through healthy bone to promote bleeding and the introduction of healthy biologic tissue to the BML.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in the Wake of the Eid al-Adha: A Single-Center, Five-Year Investigation

(1) Background: The Festival of Sacrifice, commonly known as Eid al-Adha, has a profound religious and cultural impact on nations with a Muslim majority. This festival is celebrated every year in Muslim countries; however, it is a time in which patients present to the emergency department with serious injuries. In our study, we examined current injuries occurring during Eid al-Adha in one of the largest hospitals in Türkiye, providing the largest patient population to date. This included mapping tendon and maxillofacial injuries, a first in the literature. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest case series of injuries sustained during Eid al-Adha. The significance of this study lies in its potential to significantly benefit patients and healthcare systems by providing reference data. (2) Methods: Patients admitted to Ankara City Hospital during Eid al-Adha between 2019 and 2023 were examined. The demographic characteristics, injury patterns, and injury sites of patients admitted on the four days of Eid al-Adha were collected and analyzed. Maxillofacial traumas during the festival were analyzed. Tendon injuries on the left hand, which is the most commonly injured body part in the literature, were mapped into a figure. To compare the change in the number of patients, a comparison was made with the number of patients in our hospital for four consecutive days 2 weeks before Eid. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. (3) Results: A total of 610 patients, including 101 female and 509 male patients, were included in this study. A statistically significant increase (p < 0.001 for all years) in hospital admission due to injury was observed. Individuals between the ages of 30 and 40 years were the most frequently admitted patients (n = 182, 29.8%). Knife injuries were significantly more common in all patients (p < 0.001). When the total number of patients was evaluated in terms of injured areas where patients present to the emergency department, left-hand injuries were found to be significantly more common than injuries in other areas (p < 0.001 for all). The extensor pollicus longus tendon was the most commonly injured tendon among all extensor and flexor tendon injuries (n = 104). The most commonly injured tendon was the flexor tendon in zone 2 of the first finger (n = 45). This study showed that injuries to the extensor tendon in zone 1 of the fifth finger, the flexor tendon in zone 4 of the first finger, and the flexor tendon in zone 1 of the fifth finger were never seen. Twenty-five patients with maxillofacial injuries were admitted to the hospital. Orbital floor fractures were the most common type of maxillofacial injury. The anesthesia technique we preferred for all patients was local anesthesia (n = 267). Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) was the second most preferred anesthetic technique. The number of patients who were selected in a random 4-day period for each year were compared with the number of patients who came during Eid al-Adha. The Mann-Whitney U tests revealed a significant increase in injuries on the first day of Eid al-Adha compared to non-festival days (p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed on the subsequent days or in the overall injury counts during the festival period (p = 0.841 for day 2, p = 0.151 for day 3, p = 0.310 for day 4). (4) Conclusions: According to this study, which is the largest known case series in the literature, the number of patients admitted to the hospital increased annually. In our study, we observed a significant increase in injuries only on the first day of Eid al-Adha compared to a randomly selected 4-day period of the same year. Left-hand extensor tendon injuries from a knife were the most common injuries in middle-aged men. The extensor pollicis longus tendon was the most commonly injured extensor tendon, with zones 3 and 4 being the most commonly affected. The flexor pollicis longus tendon was the most commonly injured flexor tendon in zone 2. During this period, patients may not only need hand surgery but also maxillofacial plastic surgery. We recommend, in addition to the indications I,n the literature that during Eid al-Adha, the WALANT technique should be widely adopted in patients where local anesthesia will be insufficient. We also recommend utilizing a diagram to manage the patient load during Eid al-Adha and prevent overburdening the healthcare system.

Current Trends in Use of Epinephrine in Hand Surgery

BACKGROUND

Epinephrine use during hand surgery has been stigmatized due to a fear of digital necrosis. Clinical experience in the past 2 decades has shown epinephrine in local anesthetic to be safe. We sought to analyze the use of epinephrine among hand surgeons and identify variables associated with it.

METHODS

A deidentified 21-question survey was distributed via email to the 914 and 415 members of the American Association for Hand Surgery and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand, respectively. Questions included residency type, years of practice, practice setup/ownership, practice leadership, usage of epinephrine, availability of reversal agents, and reasons for or against usage.

RESULTS

Of 188 responders, 170 (90%) used epinephrine in local anesthetic for hand surgery procedures. By nationality, 100% (43) of Canadian surgeons and 89% (108) of US surgeons use epinephrine (P = .01). Among surgeons with practice ownership, 88% (102) used epinephrine compared with 93% (85) of those surgeons that we employed (P = .28). Comparing surgeons with teaching responsibilities versus those without training responsibilities showed that surgeons who did not teach used epinephrine at a higher rate (87% vs 98%, P = .04). In addition, plastic surgery-trained surgeons (111) used epinephrine in 97.2% of cases while orthopedic surgery-trained surgeons (57) used epinephrine in 80.2% of cases (P = .0003). No difference was found when examining the use of epinephrine and surgeon age (P = .28).

CONCLUSIONS

Most respondents believe that epinephrine is safe. Training background, location, and practice setup are significant factors in the use of epinephrine, whereas practice ownership and physician age are not major factors.

Trigger Finger Release Using Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet Versus Local Anesthesia With a Tourniquet: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Trigger finger release (TFR) is a common hand surgery, historically performed using a tourniquet. Recently, wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) has gained popularity due to ostensible advantages such as improved patient pain, satisfaction, lower rate of complications, and decreased cost. This systematic review compares outcomes of WALANT for TFR with local anesthesia with a tourniquet (LAWT). MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. All English-language peer-reviewed randomized and observational studies assessing TFR in adults were included. Quality of evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Eleven studies (4 randomized controlled trials, 7 observational) including 1233 patients were identified. In the WALANT group, pain on injection was statistically nonsignificantly lower (mean difference [MD]: -1.69 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -4.14 to 0.76, P = .18) and postoperative pain was statistically lower in 2 studies. Patient and physician satisfaction were higher and analgesic use was lower in WALANT. There were no significant differences between groups for functional outcomes or rates of adverse events. Preoperative time was longer (MD: 26.43 minutes, 95% CI = 15.36 to 37.51, P < .01), operative time similar (MD: -0.59 minutes, 95% CI = -2.37 to 1.20, P = .52), postoperative time shorter (MD: -27.72 minutes, 95% CI = -36.95 to -18.48, P < .01), and cost lower (MD: -52.2%, 95% CI = -79.9% to -24.5%) in WALANT versus LAWT. The GRADE certainty of evidence of these results ranges from very low to low. This systematic review does not confirm superiority of WALANT over LAWT for TFR due to moderate to high risk of bias of included studies; further robust trials must be conducted.

Intraoperative Challenges in Hand Surgery

A wide array of intraoperative issues can arise during surgery involving the hand and upper extremity. An understanding of the common pitfalls within hand surgery may help practicing hand surgeons circumvent such issues. Within this manuscript, we first identify problems with the increasingly popular technique of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT). Achieving appropriate hemostasis and anesthetic can be bothersome, especially for procedures proximal to the distal palmar crease. We discuss our local anesthetic timing and concentrations to help mitigate such issues, as well as other problems that may arise in WALANT procedures. There also lies a barrier in connecting the traumatized patient to care in the outpatient/ambulatory setting. Additionally, the polytraumatized patient increases the complexity of care coordination for not just the hand surgeon, but all surgical providers involved. The order in which multidisciplinary surgical procedures are performed is influenced by both the complexity of the patient's case as well as the institution's current protocol. All academic institutions are faced with challenges in providing optimal intraoperative education to trainees. We acknowledge that there should be a balance between the attending surgeon executing key portions of the procedure and the trainee gaining the appropriate hands-on experience. This manuscript elaborates on the issues of intraoperative education provided to residents and anecdotal methods that may help overcome such challenges. Resources within hand surgery can often be limited and become particularly problematic in the operative setting. Specific examples include but are not limited to the lack of dedicated teams, inability to obtain appropriate intraoperative imaging, access to appropriate hardware, and intraoperative complications in an ambulatory surgery center setting.

WALANT for hand wound exploration in isolated conditions: Feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Military doctors usually deal with hand wound management. Their practice sometimes takes them far from any specialized surgical center. The WALANT could be a powerful tool for doctors operating in nuclear submarines or as part of special forces. This is a comparative, prospective and multicenter study. The hypothesis was that the management of hand wounds by military doctors specifically trained in WALANT and in the surgical exploration of hand wounds allowed a diagnosis as effective as in the FESUM center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Military doctors, usually operating in isolated conditions, were trained at WALANT. Then, this method was used for the exploration of hand wounds in the emergency room, in a center outside FESUM. At the end, two different questionnaires were completed respectively by the patient and the operator. They aimed to assess various criteria such as the overall satisfaction of the patient and the operator, the level of pain felt or the ability of the operator to establish a precise lesion assessment. The results were compared with those obtained under the same conditions by hand surgeons in the FESUM centre.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the two centers in terms of diagnostic capacity, satisfaction, comfort and perceived pain intensity.

DISCUSSION

Under cover of prior training, the WALANT is effective for the exploration of hand wounds by submariner doctors and members of the special forces. Its use makes it possible to establish a precise injury report and this in material and human conditions approaching as closely as possible those of the armed forces on mission. The comfort of the patient remains preserved.

CONCLUSION

The WALANT represents an effective tool for the exploration and lesion assessment of hand wounds outside the FESUM centre. Since emergency conditions are similar to those encountered in operational conditions, its use is also possible in situations specific to military doctors: nuclear submarines, special forces on mission.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; comparative study, retrospective, multicentre.

Effects of fixation of clavicle fracture using wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique on intra-operative bleeding volume, surgical duration, and post-operatively visual analog scale (VAS); A case series study

Clavicle fractures are common fractures with a rate of 2-5 percent among fractures. Mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle are more common than the other sites of the clavicle. Traditionally, surgical fixation of clavicle fractures has been performed under General Anesthesia (GA). The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of WALANT on intraoperative bleeding, pain control during and after surgery, postoperative complications and patients' function. In the current study, 30 patients with clavicle fractures were surgically fixed using the WALANT technique. The obtained results showed that it could be an effective technique for pain control during the operation and also early postoperative period. Moreover, the WALANT technique could be considered safe in patients who are at risk for GA because of medical comorbidities, cervical spine injuries, or other factors that make intubation difficult.

Out-of-Pocket and Total Costs for Common Hand Procedures From 2008 to 2016: A Nationwide Claims Database Analysis

PURPOSE

Rising patient out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and financial distress have been associated with reduced access to and delays in care. We evaluated whether OOP and total costs for common hand procedures have increased from 2008 to 2016 and identified key drivers of these costs.

METHODS

Using the IBM MarketScan Research Databases, we identified patients who underwent trigger finger release, open carpal tunnel release, thumb carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty, cubital tunnel release, or open treatment of distal radius fracture in the outpatient setting between 2008 and 2016. Patient OOP costs included copayment, coinsurance, and deductible payments. Costs not directly related to medical care, such as transportation and childcare costs, were not included. The overall cost was defined as the sum of the patient OOP cost and insurer reimbursements. We calculated changes in OOP and total overall costs over the study period. We also performed multivariable linear regressions to evaluate the associations between costs and procedure type, insurance type, region, and site of service.

RESULTS

The mean patient OOP cost increased by 55% to 71% and the total overall cost increased by 20% to 45%, depending on the procedure, between 2008 and 2016. Facility overall costs increased by 38%, whereas professional overall costs increased by 9%. Procedures performed in an office-based setting were associated with the lowest patient OOP and total overall costs, whereas high-deductible health plans were associated with the highest OOP costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient OOP and total overall costs increased for the most common hand procedures between 2008 and 2016, driven by a substantial increase in facility costs. Office-based procedures were associated with the lowest costs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

To alleviate the rising patient cost burden, hand surgeons could incorporate OOP cost considerations into shared decision-making tools, identify patients who may benefit from financial counseling, and shift procedures to an office-based setting.

Prevalence, Burden, and Sources of Out-of-Network Billing in Elective Hand Surgery: A National Claims Database Analysis

PURPOSE

Surprise out-of-network (OON) bills can represent a considerable cost burden on patients. However, OON billing remains underexplored in elective, outpatient surgery procedures, which have greater latitude for patient choice. We aimed to answer the following questions: (1) What is the prevalence and magnitude of OON charges in hand surgery? (2) What are the sources of OON charges? and (3) What factors are associated with OON charges?

METHODS

We analyzed patient-level data from the Clinformatics Data Mart database. We identified patients undergoing carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, wrist ganglion removal, de Quervain release, limited palmar fasciectomy, or thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty at in-network facilities with an in-network primary surgeon. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgical episodes with at least 1 OON charge. Secondary outcomes included the magnitude of potential balance bills (portion of OON bill exclusive of the standardized payment and expected patient cost-sharing), sources of OON charges, and factors associated with OON charges.

RESULTS

Of 112,211 elective hand surgery episodes, 8% (9,158) had at least 1 OON charge. OON charges ranged from $1,154 (95% confidence interval, $1,018-$1,289) for wrist ganglion removal to $3,162 (95% confidence interval, $2,902-$3,423) for thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty. In episodes with OON charges, the major sources of OON charges were anesthesiologists (75% of episodes), durable medical equipment (10% of episodes), and pathologists (9% of episodes). Site of service, geographic region, and health exchange-purchased plans were highly associated with OON charges.

CONCLUSIONS

Out-of-network billing can represent a substantial cost burden to patients and should be considered in perioperative decision-making in elective hand surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding the potential costs related to OON services during a surgical episode, and its drivers, allows surgeons to consider detailed cost discussions during perioperative decision making.

WALANT: A Discussion of Indications, Impact, and Educational Requirements

Wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet (WALANT) is a technique that removes the requirement for operations to be performed with a tourniquet, general/regional anesthesia, sedation or an anesthetist. We reviewed the WALANT literature with respect to the diverse indications and impact of WALANT to discuss the importance of future surgical curriculum integration. With appropriate patient selection, WALANT may be used effectively in upper and lower limb surgery; it is also a useful option for patients who are unsuitable for general/regional anesthesia. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the use of WALANT in more complex operations in both upper and lower limb surgery. WALANT is a safe, effective, and simple technique associated with equivalent or superior patient pain scores among other numerous clinical and cost benefits. Cost benefits derive from reduced requirements for theater/anesthetic personnel, space, equipment, time, and inpatient stay. The lack of a requirement for general anesthesia reduces aerosol generating procedures, for example, intubation/high-flow oxygen, hence patients and staff also benefit from the reduced potential for infection transmission. WALANT provides a relatively, but not entirely, bloodless surgical field. Training requirements include the surgical indications, volume calculations, infiltration technique, appropriate perioperative patient/team member communication, and specifics of each operation that need to be considered, for example, checking of active tendon glide versus venting of flexor tendon pulleys. WALANT offers significant clinical, economic, and operative safety advantages when compared with general/regional anesthesia. Key challenges include careful patient selection and the comprehensive training of future surgeons to perform the technique safely.

Are We Working Harder for Less Pay? A Survey of Medicare Reimbursement for Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery

BACKGROUND

Ongoing concern for declining Medicare payment to surgeons may incentivize surgeons to perform more cases to maintain productivity goals. The authors evaluated trends in physician payment, patient charges, and reimbursement ratios for the most common hand and upper extremity surgical procedures.

METHODS

The authors examined Medicare surgeon payment, patient charges, and surgical volume from 2012 to 2017 for 83 common surgical procedures, incorporating the year-to-year Consumer Price Index to adjust for inflation. The reimbursement ratio was calculated by dividing payment by charge. Weighted (by surgery type and volume) averages were calculated.

RESULTS

Total Medicare surgeon payment increased 5.6 percent to $272 million for the studied procedures. Patient charges were seven times greater than payment, growing 24 percent to $1.9 billion. Despite growth of total payment, the average overall weighted payment for a single surgery decreased 3.5 percent. The average weighted patient charge increased 8 percent, whereas the reimbursement ratio decreased 13 percent. A hand surgeon would need to perform three more cases per 100 in 2017 to maintain the same reimbursement received in 2012. After categorizing these 83 surgical procedures, distal radius fixation (>3 parts, 21 percent increase; >2-part intra-articular, extra-articular, and percutaneous pinning, 17 percent increase), bony trauma proximal to the distal radius (10 percent increase), and upper extremity flap (5 percent increase) were subject to the greatest increases in payment. Payment for forearm fasciotomy (39 percent decrease), endoscopic carpal tunnel release (30 percent decrease), and mass excisions proximal to the wrist (18 percent decrease) decreased the most.

CONCLUSIONS

From 2012 to 2017, despite a disproportionate increase in procedure charges, Medicare surgeon payment has not decreased substantially; however, total reimbursement is multifactorial and involves multiple sources of revenue and cost.

WALANT technique versus locoregional anesthesia in the surgical management of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures: Lessons from the Covid-19 crisis

Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) is an anesthetic method which uses a local injection of anesthetic and epinephrine, avoiding use of a tourniquet. During the COVID-19 pandemic, human and logistic resources had to be reorganized, and WALANT ensured resilience in our department to maintain access to surgical care. The objective of the present study was to compare hand function recovery 3 months after surgery for unstable metacarpal or phalangeal fracture under regional anesthesia versus WALANT. From November 2020 to May 2021, 36 patients presenting a metacarpal or phalangeal fracture requiring surgical treatment were included in a single-center study in a university hospital center. Nineteen patients underwent surgery under locoregional anesthesia with tourniquet, and 17 under WALANT. The main endpoint was functional recovery at 3 months on QuickDASH score. Need for complementary anesthesia, surgery duration, analgesic consumption, reintervention rate, and patient satisfaction were also assessed. There was no significant difference between groups in functional recovery at 3 months or on the secondary endpoints. In the COVID-19 context, WALANT proved to be a safe and effective method in hand fracture surgery, ensuring access to surgical care. It should be included in surgical training to optimize day-to-day surgical care and face future crises.