The impact of COVID-19 on hand therapy practice

Adaptive Approaches to Physical Pain Treatment Modalities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis

Background and Purpose: Despite the lack of proven efficacy, opioids historically have been used for the treatment of noncancer back pain. A variety of other effective therapeutic options for pain management are becoming more available over time. In 2016, Oregon implemented a unique and novel policy to improve evidence-based back pain care and promote safer and more effective opioid prescribing through the state's Medicaid program, the Oregon Health Plan. This article examines the ways providers adapted to providing care for patients with back pain in the context of COVID-19 and to better understand the challenges faced by and adaptations made by providers. Methods: We conducted focus groups with clinicians and physical pain treatment modality practitioners (PPTMPs). In total, 129 providers participated in one of six focus groups, including 74 clinicians (54%) and 55 PPTMPs (42%). Reflexive thematic analysis was used to construct themes or units of meaning across data. Results: Focus groups revealed concerns about PPE shortages, telemedicine challenges, communication barriers, and profession-specific responses to COVID-19, which hindered patient care and referrals. Focus groups also highlighted some advantages related to increased insight into patients' lives, which enhanced treatment. Care during COVID-19 has resulted in continued patient interest in telehealth and telemedicine. Conclusion: Optimizing use of these technologies for health conditions, such as back pain, adds to treatment options for patients and gives providers a more holistic understanding of patients' lives, the challenges they may face, and how that impacts their treatment.

Investigation of the barriers to and functional outcomes of telerehabilitation in patients with hand injury

BACKGROUND

Telerehabilitation is an approach that is growing in importance and rapidly becoming more prevalent. However, the potential barriers to this approach and its effectiveness relative to face-to-face treatment still need to be determined.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the technology and access barriers, implementation and organizational challenges, and communication barriers faced by patients undergoing postoperative telerehabilitation after hand tendon repair surgery. It also aimed to investigate the effect of telerehabilitation on pain, kinesiophobia, and functional outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, nonrandomized comparative clinical study.

METHODS

The study was conducted with 44 patients who underwent tendon repair surgery due to tendon injuries of the extrinsic muscles of the hand. Participants were divided into two groups (face-to-face group and telerehabilitation group). All participants received three physiotherapy sessions per week for 8 weeks from their surgery (via video conference using mobile phones to the telerehabilitation group). An early passive motion protocol was applied for flexor tendon and zone 5-7 extensor tendon repairs. Mallet finger rehabilitation was performed for zone 2 extensor tendon repairs, while an early active short arc approach was used for zone 3-4 repairs. The telerehabilitation and face-to-face groups received the same treatment protocols three times a week. In the eighth week of treatment (in the 24th session), the Turkish version of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Injury Questionnaire (DASH-T) and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia were administered to all patients. The telerehabilitation group also underwent a barrier questionnaire. A pretreatment assessment could not be conducted. The independent-sample t-test was used for DASH-T data, and the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia to compare groups.

RESULTS

In the study, there were 24 participants (age: 31.58 ± 12.02 years) in the face-to-face group and 20 participants (age: 39.25 ± 12.72 years) in the telerehabilitation group. The two groups were similar in terms of DASH-T and pain (p = 0.103, effect size = 0.647, and p = 0.086, effect size = 0.652, respectively) in the 8 weeks. However, the telerehabilitation group had a higher fear of movement (p = 0.017, effect size = 3.265). The most common barriers to telerehabilitation practices were the fear of damaging the tendon repair and the need for help during the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined that face-to-face treatment in acute physiotherapy for patients who have undergone tendon repair may be more effective compared to telerehabilitation, as it appears to be less likely to induce kinesiophobia. However, in situations where face-to-face treatment is not possible (such as lockdown), telerehabilitation can also be preferred after at least one in-person session to teach and perform exercises.

Reliability and clinical utility of a novel telehealth-based goniometry approach to measure range of motion of the digits of the hand

BACKGROUND

Range of motion (ROM) is an outcome measure commonly used when treating acute and chronic hand injuries and conditions. Increased adoption of telehealth service provision in hand therapy practice, influenced by the advent of COVID-19, has led to the need for a valid and reliable approach to measure the range of motion of the digits of the hand when providing hand therapy services using telehealth.

PURPOSE

To determine if performing manual goniometry during a livestream teleconsultation is reliable and clinically useful to measure the range of motion of the fifth digit when providing hand therapy services using telehealth.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical measurement, repeated-measures study.

METHODS

According to a measurement protocol, 12 independent raters (who currently provide hand therapy services) each obtained several screen-based goniometric range of motion measurements of the fifth digit at 2-time points. Raters were surveyed on the clinical utility of the telehealth-based goniometry approach. Measures of relative and absolute reliability were calculated to evaluate test-retest and inter-rater reliability. Free-text responses were analyzed using content analysis.

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability was excellent for all flexion and extension measures (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥ 0.89) but poor for the arc of motion (ICC ≤ 0.67). Test-retest reliability was poor (ICC ≤ 0.43). No statistically significant differences between test and retest measurements were observed (P ≥ 0.24). The overall coefficient of variation indicated good precision (14.69%). Measurement error (≤6.07º) and limits of agreement (≤6.33) had acceptable levels to support clinical use. Content analysis revealed several practical considerations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that performing manual goniometry during a livestream teleconsultation is unreliable for measuring the range of motion of the fifth digit. However, when combined with patient-reported and functional outcomes, this approach may be suitable to facilitate a range of motion assessment for certain functions of telehealth service provision in hand therapy practice.

Patient satisfaction with telehealth vs in-person hand therapy: A retrospective review of results of an online satisfaction survey

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a shift from in-person to telehealth visits in many outpatient rehabilitation facilities.

PURPOSE

To determine whether patients reported similar levels of satisfaction receivingtelehealth hand therapy as when receiving in-person hand therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of patient satisfaction surveys.

METHODS

Satisfaction surveys were reviewed retrospectively among patients who participated in in-person hand therapy between April 21 and October 21, 2019, or after participating in telehealth hand therapy between April 21 and October 21, 2020. Information on gender, age, insurance provider, postoperative status and comments were also collected. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare survey scores between groups. Chi -squared tests were used to compare categorical patient characteristics between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 288 surveys were included: 121 surveys for in-person evaluations, 53 surveys for in-person follow-up visits, 55 surveys for telehealth evaluations and 59 surveys for telehealth follow-up visits. No significant differences in satisfaction were observed between in-person and telehealth visits of either type or when patients were stratified by age (p = 0.78), gender (p = 0.41), insurance payer group (p = 0.099) or postoperative status (p = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Similar rates of satisfaction were observed with both in-person visits and telehealth hand therapy visits. Questions that related to registration and scheduling tended to score lower across all groups, while questions related to technology scored lower in the telehealth groups. Future studies are needed to explore the efficacy and viability of a telehealth platform for hand therapy services.

The use of telephone and video consultations in upper limb musculoskeletal rehabilitation: A scoping review

Introduction

In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic caused a rapid uptake of virtual consultations (VCs) to minimise disease transmission and for this reason, research into telerehabilitation has been expanding. This review aimed to map and synthesize evidence on the use of VCs in upper limb musculoskeletal rehabilitation, describe key characteristics, and identify gaps in the research.

Methods

This scoping review investigated synchronous rehabilitation consultations performed over VC. All asynchronous, wearable or pre-recorded technology was excluded. CINAHL Complete, Medline, PEDro, Google Scholar and grey literature sources were searched. Screening and data extraction were done by a single researcher. Frequency counts were used to analyse the data.

Results

Nineteen studies were identified, with patients with shoulder injury/pain most frequently studied. Most sources (n = 9) used bespoke video programmes. Range of motion (ROM) was the most common assessment (n = 10) and exercise prescription (n = 7) was the most common treatment. Benefits included time and cost savings, maintaining therapeutic relationships and increasing patient independence. Most diagnostic assessments, except joint and nerve tension tests, were found to be reliable and valid. Studies noted increased function in activities, decreased pain and increased ROM after VCs. Limitations included restricted 'hands-on' treatment, resource and training concerns and limiting patient factors.

Conclusions

This review mapped available evidence and identified several gaps in the literature. Further robust research into VCs for hand/wrist disorders, ROM assessment and cost-effectiveness is needed.

Exploring the patient experience of telehealth hand therapy services during the COVID-19 pandemic

STUDY DESIGN

Electronic Survey.

INTRODUCTION

Internationally the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented shift from face-to-face therapy to telehealth services.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This paper explores the patient experience and satisfaction with telehealth hand therapy in a metropolitan setting during a period (March 1 to May 31, 2021) of 'moderate' COVID-19 risk when there was minimal community transmission of COVID-19.

METHODS

Patients attending telehealth services were invited to participate in an English language online survey at the conclusion of their therapy session via a pop-up invitation.

RESULTS

During the recruitment period there were 123 survey responses (29% response rate; 98% completion rate). Half of the respondents (n = 78, 53%) reported saving between 10 and 29 minutes of travel time (each way) by attending a telehealth appointment, while 36% (n = 44) saved more than 30 minutes (each way). Almost all respondents (n = 117, 95%) noted telehealth should be used in the future. The main benefit for telehealth was more easily fitting appointments around other commitments, followed by reducing stress and costs surrounding hospital attendance. Most participants (n = 97, 79%) reported no challenges using telehealth. The most cited challenges included the therapist not being able to provide hands on treatment (n = 14, 11%) and for seven respondents getting the technology to work (6%).

DISCUSSION

The elevated level of participant satisfaction of attending telehealth sessions informs us that this mode of therapy delivery could benefit patients in a post-pandemic environment.

CONCLUSIONS

Metropolitan funding models prior to the pandemic did not allow for this mode of therapy and hence consideration for an ongoing hybrid funding model of both face-to-face and telehealth should be considered by policy makers, insurance and government funding bodies.

Remote Delivery of Service: A Survey of Occupational Therapists’ Perceptions

Background:

Telehealth has been declared an accepted method of occupational therapy (OT) service delivery and has been shown to be effective. However, studies done before the outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) show that most occupational therapists didn’t use it.

Aim:

The aim of this exploratory study was to examine the perceptions of occupational therapists regarding remote delivery of service following the COVID-19 outbreak.

Material and methods:

An online survey, including 11-item five-point Likert scale, and 2 open-ended questions were distributed to occupational therapists.

Results:

Responses were received from 245 Israeli occupational therapists. The majority of the participants (60%) strongly agreed that remote delivery allows an ecological and effective intervention, while 76% strongly agreed that an ideal treatment is one that would combine telehealth with in-person intervention. Qualitative findings indicated that the most significant advantage was providing care in the natural environment and improving accessibility to the service. The most salient barriers were limitations of the therapeutic relationship and threats on clinical reasoning.

Conclusion:

The study results highlight the complexity of telehealth. Findings indicate that overall occupational therapists perceive remote care as an effective and legitimate service delivery method that cannot be used as an alternative to in-person treatment. These findings can help in developing intervention programs for remote treatment, and their implementation.

A follow up survey on the impact of COVID-19 on hand therapy practice

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus-19 pandemic continues to influence on the hand therapy community. It is important to understand how therapists are currently affected and how things have changed since the onset of the pandemic.

PURPOSE

Follow-up on a previous survey and investigate the current status of hand therapy practice 10 months into the pandemic.

STUDY DESIGN

Web-based survey.

METHODS

A 38-item survey was electronically delivered to American Society of Hand Therapists members between December 9, 2020 and January 6, 2021. Stress, safety measures, changes in practice patterns and telehealth were focus areas in the survey. Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient was used to analyze nonparametric correlations, Chi-Square analysis examined relationships between categorical values and unpaired t-tests were utilized for the comparison of means.

RESULTS

Of the 378 respondents, 85% reported higher stress levels compared to pre-pandemic times. Younger therapists expressed more stress over childcare concerns (r_s = 0.38;P = .000) and job security (r_s = 0.21; P = .000), while older therapists expressed more stress over eldercare concerns (r_s= -.13;P = .018). Descriptively, hours spent on direct clinical care were near prepandemic levels. Telehealth is currently used by 29% of respondents and did not correlate to age or years of practice. Postoperative cases (t(423) = 4.18;P = .0001) and people age 50-64-years (t(423) = 3.01;P = .002) were most frequently seen for in person visits. Nontraumatic, nonoperative cases (t(423) = 4.52;P = .0001) as well as those 65 years and older (t(423) = 3.71; P = .0002) were more likely to be seen via telehealth.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand therapists are adapting as reflected by the return to near normal work hours and less utilization of telehealth. Respondents still report higher levels of stress compared to prior to the pandemic, and this stress appears to be multifactorial in nature. Weariness with the precautionary measures such as mask wearing, social distancing and sanitizing was expressed through open-ended responses.