Ceftriaxone versus tazobactam/piperacillin and carbapenems in the treatment of aspiration pneumonia: A propensity score matching analysis

Antibiotic therapy for bacterial pneumonia

Pneumonia is a common infection in patients of all ages. Determining its etiology and selecting antibiotic therapy are challenging for physicians in both private practice and hospitals. Moreover, the coronavirus disease pandemic revealed the importance of prevention and treatment of secondary bacterial pneumonia in patients hospitalized with viral respiratory infections. This review focuses on the types of bacteria that cause pneumonia and provides new insights into antibiotic therapy for bacterial pneumonia. Moreover, it also reviews the current state of knowledge regarding secondary bacterial pneumonia.

Anaerobic Antibiotic Coverage in Aspiration Pneumonia and the Associated Benefits and Harms: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics with extended anaerobic coverage are used commonly to treat aspiration pneumonia, which is not recommended by current guidelines.

RESEARCH QUESTION

In patients admitted to hospital for community-acquired aspiration pneumonia, does a difference exist between antibiotic therapy with limited anaerobic coverage (LAC) vs antibiotic therapy with extended anaerobic coverage (EAC) in terms of in-hospital mortality and risk of Clostridioides difficile colitis?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 18 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2022. Patients were included if the physician diagnosed aspiration pneumonia and prescribed guideline-concordant first-line community-acquired pneumonia parenteral antibiotic therapy to the patient within 48 h of admission. Patients then were categorized into the LAC group if they received ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, or levofloxacin. Patients were categorized into the EAC group if they received amoxicillin-clavulanate, moxifloxacin, or any of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, or levofloxacin in combination with clindamycin or metronidazole. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included incident C difficile colitis occurring after admission. Overlap weighting of propensity scores was used to balance baseline prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The LAC and EAC groups included 2,683 and 1,316 patients, respectively. In hospital, 814 patients (30.3%) and 422 patients (32.1%) in the LAC and EAC groups died, respectively. C difficile colitis occurred in five or fewer patients (≤ 0.2%) and 11 to 15 patients (0.8%-1.1%) in the LAC and EAC groups, respectively. After overlap weighting of propensity scores, the adjusted risk difference of EAC minus LAC was 1.6% (95% CI, -1.7% to 4.9%) for in-hospital mortality and 1.0% (95% CI, 0.3%-1.7%) for C difficile colitis.

INTERPRETATION

We found that extended anaerobic coverage likely is unnecessary in aspiration pneumonia because it was associated with no additional mortality benefit, only an increased risk of C difficile colitis.

Antibiotics for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in children with neurodisability: Systematic review

AIM

Determine the optimal antibiotic choice for lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in children with neurodisability.

METHODS

Embase, Ovid Emcare and MEDLINE were searched for studies from inception to January 2023. All studies, except case reports, focusing on the antibiotic treatment of LRTI in children, with neurodisabilities were included. Outcomes included length of stay, intensive care admission and mortality.

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria (5115 patients). All the studies were of low quality. The shortest length of stay was with anaerobic and gram-positive cover. Five studies used anaerobic, gram-positive and gram-negative cover (e.g., amoxicillin-clavulanic acid), which was frequently adequate. In one large study, it was better than gram-positive and gram-negative cover alone (e.g. ceftriaxone). Those unresponsive or more unwell at presentation improved faster on Pseudomonas aeruginosa cover (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam).

CONCLUSION

In this context, anaerobic, gram-positive and gram-negative cover is just as effective as P. aeruginosa cover, supporting empiric treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. If there is a failure to improve, broadening to include P. aeruginosa could be considered. This is consistent with a consensus statement on the treatment of LRTI in children with neurodisability. An accepted definition for what constitutes LRTI in this cohort is required before designing prospective randomised trials.

Comparative effectiveness of cefmetazole versus carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam as initial therapy for bacteremic acute cholangitis: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) are commonly used as the initial therapy to treat extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales in acute cholangitis. However, the overuse of these antibiotics contributes to the spread of antimicrobial resistance. Cefmetazole (CMZ) is stable to hydrolysis by ESBLs, so it may be an alternative to carbapenems and PIPC/TAZ. However, the effectiveness of CMZ compared with that of carbapenems and PIPC/TAZ as the initial therapy for acute cholangitis is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a university hospital between April 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022. Patients with bacteremic acute cholangitis who received CMZ, carbapenems, or PIPC/TAZ as the initial therapy were included. The patients were divided into a CMZ group and a carbapenems or PIPC/TAZ (CP) group to compare patient outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 99 patients (54 in the CMZ group and 45 in the CP group) were analyzed. The baseline characteristics of the patients were similar and 30-day mortality did not differ between groups (4% vs. 7%, P = 0.66). However, the CMZ group had a shorter length of stay (LOS) (8 days vs. 15 days, P < 0.001) and lower mean antibiotic cost (98.92 USD vs. 269.49 USD, P < 0.001) than the CP group.

CONCLUSIONS

In bacteremic acute cholangitis, initial therapy with CMZ may contribute to a shorter LOS and lower antibiotic costs than treatment with carbapenems and PIPC/TAZ, without worsening patient outcomes.

Silver(I)-Tazobactam Frameworks with Improved Antimicrobial Activity

Tazobactam (TazoH) is a penicillinate sulfone β-lactamase inhibitor with negligible antimicrobial activity, commonly used with other antibiotics to provide an effective combination against many susceptible organisms expressing β-lactamases. Two novel Ag(I)-tazobactam frameworks ([Ag(I)-Tazo] and [Ag(I)-Tazo2]) prepared by mechanochemistry are presented herein as alternative forms to improve the antimicrobial activity of tazobactam by exploring synergistic effects with silver, being the first crystal structures reported of tazobactam coordinating to a metal site. The topological analysis of the 3D ([Ag(I)-Tazo]) and 2D+1D ([Ag(I)-Tazo2]) frameworks revealed underlying nets with the cbs (CrB self-dual) and decorated sql topologies, respectively. These novel frameworks are stable and show an enhanced antimicrobial activity when compared to tazobactam alone. Amongst the tested microorganisms, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most sensitive to tazobactam and the new compounds. This study thus unveils novel facets of tazobactam chemistry and opens up its application as a multifunctional linker for the design of antibiotic coordination frameworks and related materials.

Efficacy and validity of guideline-concordant treatment according to the JRS guidelines for the managements of pneumonia in adults updated in 2017 for nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia. A propensity-matching score analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) commonly receive empiric antibiotic therapy according to the guideline's recommendation corresponding to the patient's deteriorated conditions. However, it is unclear whether guideline-concordant treatment (GCT) could be effective or not.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To evaluate the efficacy and validity of GCT according to the current guideline for pneumonia, we conducted this retrospective study. NHCAP patients who were admitted to our institute between 2014 and 2017 were enrolled. Based on the initial antibiotic treatment, these patients were divided into two groups, the GCT group (n = 83) and the non-GCT group (n = 146). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics and potential confounders between the two groups. After PSM, patients' characteristics, microbial profiles, and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Both groups were well-balanced after PSM, and 78 patients were selected from each group. There were no differences in patients' characteristics or microbial profiles between the two groups. As for outcomes, there were no differences in 30-day, in-hospital mortality rate, duration of antibiotic treatment, or admission. The severity of pneumonia was more severe in patients with the GCT group than those with the non-GCT group. Anti-pseudomonal agents as initial treatment were more frequently seen in patients with the GCT group than those in the non-GCT group.

CONCLUSION

Unlike previous studies, GCT's recommendation for management of pneumonia by the JRS in 2017 would appear to be valid and does not increase the mortality rate.