Interventions for Actinic Keratosis in Nonscalp and Nonface Localizations: Results from a Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis

Tirbanibulin 1% Ointment for Actinic Keratosis: Results from a Real-Life Study

Background and Objectives: Tirbanibulin 1% ointment is a novel synthetic anti-proliferative agent that inhibits tubulin polymerization. It is approved for treating actinic keratosis (AK) on the face and scalp in adults. It has demonstrated good efficacy, an adequate safety profile and excellent patient adherence in the phase 3 clinical trials, however data about its real-life efficacy and safety are lacking. Here we report the experience of the dermatology unit of the University Hospital of Messina. Materials and Methods: We performed a spontaneous open-label, prospective non-randomized study to assess the effectiveness and safety of tirbanibulin 1% ointment for the treatment of 228 AKs in 38 consecutive patients-28 males (73%) and 10 females (26%)-aged between 52 and 92 years (mean age: 72 ± 8.92 years). Results: Total clearance was recorded in 51% of lesions, while partial clearance was recorded in 73% of lesions. An excellent tolerability profile and high compliance rate were observed, with no treatment discontinuation due to the onset of adverse events. Conclusion: Our real-life experience confirms the effectiveness and safety of tirbanibulin ointment for the treatment of AKs.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tirbanibulin for Actinic Keratosis of the Face and Scalp in Europe: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a chronic skin condition that may progress to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. We conducted a systematic review of efficacy and safety for key treatments for AK of the face and scalp, including the novel 5-day tirbanibulin 1% ointment. MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, clinical trial registries and regulatory body websites were searched. The review included 46 studies, of which 35 studies included interventions commonly used in Europe and were sufficiently homogenous to inform a Bayesian network meta-analysis of complete clearance against topical placebo or vehicle. The network meta-analysis revealed the following odds ratios and 95% credible intervals: cryosurgery 13.4 (6.2-30.3); diclofenac 3% 2.9 (1.9-4.3); fluorouracil 0.5% + salicylic acid 7.6 (4.6-13.5); fluorouracil 4% 30.3 (9.1-144.7); fluorouracil 5% 35.0 (10.2-164.4); imiquimod 3.75% 8.5 (3.5-22.4); imiquimod 5% 17.9 (9.1-36.6); ingenol mebutate 0.015% 12.5 (8.1-19.9); photodynamic therapy with aminolevulinic acid 24.1 (10.9-52.8); photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate 11.7 (6.0-21.9); tirbanibulin 1% 11.1 (6.2-20.9). Four sensitivity analyses, from studies assessing efficacy after one treatment cycle only, for ≤25 cm2 treatment area, after 8 weeks post-treatment, and with single placebo/vehicle node confirmed the findings from the base case. Safety outcomes were assessed qualitatively. These results suggest that tirbanibulin 1% offers a novel treatment for AK, with a single short treatment period, favourable safety profile and efficacy, in line with existing topical treatments available in Europe.

Topical Pharmacotherapy for Actinic Keratoses in Older Adults

Actinic keratosis is caused by excessive lifetime sun exposure. It must be treated, regardless of thickness, because it is the biologic precursor of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, a potentially deadly malignancy. Physical ablative techniques such as cryotherapy, lasers, and curettage are the most used treatments for isolated lesions. Multiple lesions are treated with topical drugs, chemical peelings, and physical techniques. Drug preparations containing diclofenac plus hyaluronate, aminolevulinic acid, and methyl aminolevulinate and different concentrations of imiquimod and 5-fluorouracil are approved for this clinical indication. All treatments have a good profile of efficacy and tolerability although there are relevant differences in the clearance rate, tolerability, and type and frequency of adverse effects. In addition, they have very different mechanisms of action and treatment protocols. No differences in the efficacy and tolerability were found in older patients compared with younger patients, therefore no dose adjustments are needed. That said, older patients often need to be motivated to treat actinic keratoses and a careful attention to expectations, needs, and preferences should be used to obtain the maximal adherence and prevent treatment failure. This goal can be achieved with a careful evaluation not only of published efficacy, toxicity, and tolerability data but also of practical topics such as the frequency of daily applications, the overall duration of therapy, and the need for a caregiver. Finally, particular attention must be paid in the case of frail patients and immunosuppressed patients.

Update aktinische Keratosen – Neuigkeiten und Relevanz für den Alltag

Ziel der Arbeit Die im März 2020 zuletzt überarbeitete Leitlinie „Aktinische Keratosen und Plattenepithelkarzinome der Haut“ hat aufgrund der Zunahme der klinischen Studien zum Thema aktinische Keratosen den höchsten Grad für Methodik (S3) erreicht, da diese nicht nur konsensbasiert sondern auch evidenzbasiert verfasst wurde. Diesen Entwicklungen gerecht zu werden und den klinisch relevanten Teil des aktuellen Stands des Wissens zu vermitteln, ist Ziel dieses Artikels.

Methodik Anhand der aktuellen epidemiologischen Lage wird der dramatisch wachsende Bedarf für das bessere Verständnis der Ätiologie aktinischer Keratosen deutlich. Ebenso gilt es, Patienten mit aktinischen Keratosen und therapiebedürftigen Ko-Morbiditäten vor einem therapiebedingten, erhöhten Risiko für die Entwicklung weiterer aktinischer Keratosen oder Plattenepithelkarzinomen zu bewahren. Die Möglichkeit der Spontanremission aktinischer Keratosen sollte ebenso wenig vernachlässigt werden wie eine mögliche Progredienz in ein Plattenepithelkarzinom. Die kontroverse Diskussion der fortwährend postulierten, sequenziellen Abfolge der histologischen Grade aktinischer Keratosen zum Plattenepithelkarzinom beinhaltet klinische und histologische Fallstricke. Diese sollten bei der Therapieentscheidung ebenso bedacht werden wie die Wünsche und Erwartungen der Patienten an ein Therapieregime. Eine bleibende Schwierigkeit ist die fehlende Standardisierung erhobener Daten zu den zahlreichen zur Verfügung stehenden Therapieoptionen. Das Potenzial dieses Forschungsgebietes für neue Therapiealternativen und präventive Maßnahmen lässt nach wie vor auf weitere, interessante Entwicklungen hoffen.

Ergebnisse Der gut etablierte kausale Zusammenhang zwischen kumulativer UV-Strahlung in der Entwicklung von Plattenepithelkarzinomen und aktinischer Keratosen hat zur Anerkennung berufsbedingter UV-Exposition als Berufserkrankung geführt, die auch die Anerkennung multipler aktinischer Keratosen als Berufserkrankung beinhaltet. Das therapeutische Handeln sollte durch die Gesamtanzahl der aktinischen Keratosen, das Ausmaß der betroffenen Fläche, die Dynamik des Krankheitsgeschehens und den Wunsch des Patienten bestimmt werden. Ein besonderes Augenmerk sollte auf den Patienten liegen, denen die Krankheitseinsicht fehlt oder die nur wenig motiviert zur Therapie sind. Es könnte der Schlüssel zur Verbesserung der Therapieadhärenz und Akzeptanz sein, diese Patienten zu erkennen und ihre Bedürfnisse in das Arzt-Patienten-Gespräch zu integrieren. Die Differenzierung zwischen lokalisierten aktinischen Keratosen und einer Feldkanzerisierung stellt ein wichtiges Entscheidungskriterium für die Wahl der empfohlenen Therapie dar. Die Rücknahme der Zulassung von Ingenolmebutat in der EU durch die EMA im Jahr 2020 hat das Spektrum der lokaltherapeutischen Optionen eingeschränkt. Der periinterventionelle Schmerz ist nach wie vor der limitierende Faktor für die konventionelle photodynamische Therapie, jedoch schreitet die Entwicklung für schmerzärmere Varianten weiter voran. Es ist zu erwarten, dass sich in den kommenden Jahren durch eine bessere Evidenzlage für weitere systemische oder lokaltherapeutische Optionen neue Behandlungsstrategien ergeben werden. Besonders im Fokus wird sicherlich nach wie vor die Präventionsforschung stehen, die v. a. den Erhalt einer erzielten Remission beinhaltet.

Schlussfolgerung Die aktuellen Forschungsergebnisse und -bestrebungen zur Thematik der aktinischen Keratosen sind aufgrund des zukünftig gesteigerten Bedarfes zum einen notwendig und zum anderen sehr ermutigend. Das Ende des therapeutischen Horizonts ist gegenwärtig noch nicht erreicht.

How to Assess the Efficacy of Interventions for Actinic Keratosis? A Review with a Focus on Long-Term Results

Actinic keratoses (AK) are common lesions of the skin caused by cumulative sun exposure. Since AK may progress to invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), guidelines uniformly recommend early and consequent treatment. A variety of interventions are available; however, most randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and guidelines focus on outcomes that are usually evaluated 8–12 weeks after the end of treatment. Importantly, these assessments can capture the short-term, transient outcomes, but do not allow any conclusions about long-term results to be drawn and do not reflect the probability of transition towards cSCC. Until now, few studies have assessed the long-term results of interventions for AK. Indeed, finding the most appropriate end-point and adjunct time point for determining the long-term results of interventions for AK remains a challenge. Here, we provide an overview of the different ways of measuring the efficacy of AK treatments, such as using recurrence rates or sustained clearance rates, and discuss methodological aspects. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of evidence from post-marketing surveillance trials for the detection of efficacy values and safety signals. Additionally, we emphasize that a follow-up period of 12 months might not be sufficient to reflect the long-term results and stress the urgent need for a longer follow-up period and regular risk-stratified surveillance.

Evaluation of Long-term Clearance Rates of Interventions for Actinic Keratosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Importance

Multiple interventions are available for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). However, most randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses focus on short-term efficacy outcomes.

Objective

To investigate and synthesize the long-term efficacy (≥12 months) of interventions for AK from parallel-arm randomized clinical trials.

Data Sources

Searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and Central were conducted from inception until April 6, 2020. The reference lists of the included studies and pertinent trial registers were hand searched. The study was completed February 27, 2021.

Study Selection

Two reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of 2741 records. Finally, 17 published reports (original studies and follow-up reports) referring to 15 independent randomized clinical trials with an overall sample size of 4252 patients were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two reviewers independently extracted data on study, patient, and intervention characteristics. Network meta-analysis (NMA) of each outcome was conducted with a frequentist approach. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidance for NMA was used to assess the certainty of evidence. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized clinical trials was used to evaluate the methodologic quality.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Participant complete clearance, participant partial clearance, and lesion-specific clearance were the outcomes, with each assessed at least 12 months after the end of treatment.

Results

Data from 15 independent randomized clinical trials including 4252 patients were extracted and synthesized. Ten studies were included in an NMA for the outcome of participant complete clearance, with photodynamic therapy with aminolevulinate (ALA-PDT) showing the most favorable risk ratio (RR) compared with placebo (RR, 8.06; 95% CI, 2.07-31.37; GRADE, moderate), followed by imiquimod, 5% (RR, 5.98; 95% CI, 2.26-15.84; GRADE, very low), photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL-PDT) (RR, 5.95; 95% CI, 1.21-29.41; GRADE, low), and cryosurgery (RR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.36-16.66; GRADE, very low). Similarly, ALA-PDT had the highest RR in the NMA for lesion-specific clearance (RR, 5.08; 95% CI, 2.49-10.33; GRADE, moderate). No NMA was possible for participant partial clearance owing to poor reporting of this outcome.

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review and network meta-analysis found that therapy including ALA-PDT, imiquimod, 5%, MAL-PDT, and cryosurgery was associated with significant long-term efficacy in the NMA. This study provides data for a possible use in an evidence-based framework for selecting interventions with sustained lesion clearance.

Treatment of Actinic Keratosis: Does Effectiveness Depend on the Location?

This is a comment on a network meta-analysis that evaluated the ranking of treatments for actinic keratosis outside the head and neck. The results of a limited number of heterogeneous studies contrast with the results of studies in the head and neck area. The extent to which these results can be generalized to larger treatment fields or areas with extensive field cancerization is uncertain.