Integrating rapid diagnostics and antimicrobial stewardship improves outcomes in patients with antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia

Early Diagnosis of Sepsis: The Role of Biomarkers and Rapid Microbiological Tests

Sepsis is a medical emergency resulting from a dysregulated response to an infection, causing preventable deaths and a high burden of morbidity. Protocolized and accurate interventions in sepsis are time-critical. Therefore, earlier recognition of cases allows for preventive interventions, early treatment, and improved outcomes. Clinical diagnosis of sepsis by clinical scores cannot be considered an early diagnosis, given that underlying molecular pathophysiological mechanisms have been activated in the preceding hour or days. There is a lack of a widely available tool enhancing preclinical diagnosis of sepsis. Sophisticated technologies for sepsis prediction have several limitations, including high costs. Novel technologies for fast molecular and microbiological diagnosis are focusing on bedside point-of-care combined testing to reach most settings where sepsis represents a challenge.

Time Is of the Essence: Achieving Prompt and Effective Antimicrobial Therapy of Bloodstream Infection With Advanced Hospital Information Systems

The early administration of appropriate antibiotic therapy is crucial for the survival of patients with bacteremia. Current research focuses on improving analytical times through technology, whereas there have been very few efforts to improve postanalytical times even though they represent 40% of the time between blood taking and appropriate treatment administration. One of the clues is the efficiency and appropriateness of the result communication system. Here, we review all delays in the entire process with the aim of improving time to appropriate treatment administration. We discuss causes for long times to adjust treatment once microbiological results are released. We argue that the pervasive health information system in this organization serves as both a bottleneck and a rigid framework. Finally, we explore how next-generation hospital information systems should be designed to effectively assist the doctors in treating patients with bacteremia.

Diagnostic and antibiotic use practices among COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients in the Indonesian National Referral Hospital

BACKGROUND

Little is known about diagnostic and antibiotic use practices in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) before and during COVID-19 pandemic. This information is crucial for monitoring and evaluation of diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardships in healthcare facilities.

METHODS

We linked and analyzed routine databases of hospital admission, microbiology laboratory and drug dispensing of Indonesian National Referral Hospital from 2019 to 2020. Patients were classified as COVID-19 cases if their SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR result were positive. Blood culture (BC) practices and time to discontinuation of parenteral antibiotics among inpatients who received a parenteral antibiotic for at least four consecutive days were used to assess diagnostic and antibiotic use practices, respectively. Fine and Grey subdistribution hazard model was used.

RESULTS

Of 1,311 COVID-19 and 58,917 non-COVID-19 inpatients, 333 (25.4%) and 18,837 (32.0%) received a parenteral antibiotic for at least four consecutive days. Proportion of patients having BC taken within ±1 calendar day of parenteral antibiotics being started was higher in COVID-19 than in non-COVID-19 patients (21.0% [70/333] vs. 18.7% [3,529/18,837]; p<0.001). Cumulative incidence of having a BC taken within 28 days was higher in COVID-19 than in non-COVID-19 patients (44.7% [149/333] vs. 33.2% [6,254/18,837]; adjusted subdistribution-hazard ratio [aSHR] 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-1.99, p<0.001). The median time to discontinuation of parenteral antibiotics was longer in COVID-19 than in non-COVID-19 patients (13 days vs. 8 days; aSHR 0.73, 95%Cl 0.65-0.83, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine electronic data could be used to inform diagnostic and antibiotic use practices in LMICs. In Indonesia, the proportion of timely blood culture is low in both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients, and duration of parenteral antibiotics is longer in COVID-19 patients. Improving diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship is critically needed.

Impact of financial incentives for infection prevention and management on antibiotic use: A Korea National Health Insurance cohort study

BACKGROUND

The Korean government implemented financial incentives to enhance infection prevention and management within general hospital settings. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of infection control compensation on antibiotic usage using a controlled interrupted time series analysis.

METHODS

The main unit of analysis was 270,901 inpatient episodes extracted from the Korean National Health Insurance Service Cohort Database from 2013 to 2019. The 96-month period was examined before and after the intervention, which was set to September 1, 2017, by applying a 1-year lag time after the incentive was introduced. Segmented regression was used to estimate the effects of interventions in a controlled interrupted time series. Hospitals that received nationwide financial incentives for infection prevention and management were included in the analysis. The study's primary outcome was the use of antibiotics based on the WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) classification of antibiotics, and the secondary outcome was the number of days of antibiotic use as days of therapy (DOTs) per patient day (PD).

RESULTS

The probability of overall antibiotic use decreased between incentivized and unincentivized hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 0.922; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.859-1.000). The difference in level change in the use of third-generation cephalosporins (OR,0.894; 95% CI, 0.817-0.977) and carbapenem (OR,0.790; 95% CI, 0.630-0.992) was significantly reduced between incentivized and unincentivized hospitals. The difference in slope change on DOTs/PD of glycopeptides was - 0.005 DOT/PDs, and that of carbapenem was - 0.003 between incentivized and unincentivized hospitals.

CONCLUSION

We observed that incentives for infection prevention and management have had a positive impact on some aspects of antibiotic usage. A partial decrease was observed in antibiotic use, accompanied by a modest reduction in DOTs/PD, particularly for antibiotics aimed at addressing multidrug-resistant pathogens. Further investigation is necessary to establish evidence for extending these incentives.

Multicenter evaluation of the Selux Next-Generation Phenotyping antimicrobial susceptibility testing system

The Selux Next-Generation Phenotyping (NGP) system (Charlestown, MA) is a new antimicrobial susceptibility testing system that utilizes two sequential assays performed on all wells of doubling dilution series to determine MICs. A multicenter evaluation of the performance of the Selux NGP system compared with reference broth microdilution was conducted following FDA recommendations and using FDA-defined breakpoints. A total of 2,488 clinical and challenge isolates were included; gram-negative isolates were tested against 24 antimicrobials, and gram-positive isolates were tested against 15 antimicrobials. Data is provided for all organism-antimicrobial combinations evaluated, including those that did and did not meet FDA performance requirements. Overall very major error and major error rates were less than 1% (31/3,805 and 107/15,606, respectively), essential agreement and categorical agreement were >95%, reproducibility was ≥95%, and the average time-to-result (from time of assay start to time of MIC result) was 5.65 hours.

The Rapid Phenotypic Susceptibility Testing in Real-Life Experience: How the MIC Values Impact on Sepsis Fast Diagnostic Workflow

The MIC value definition faithfully reflects antimicrobial sensitivity, profoundly impacting the infection's clinical outcome. Our study aimed to evaluate the Accelerate PhenoTM System in defining the importance of fast phenotypic susceptibility data. A number of 270 monomicrobial samples simultaneously underwent standard procedures and fast protocols after a contemporary Gram stain. Finally, we provided Turn-around Time (TAT) and statistical evaluations. The fast technology required a medium value of 7 h to complete ID and AST profiles. Although there were some spectrum limitations, it revealed an optimal success rate in microbial identification directly from positive blood cultures. The Gram-negative AST reached a 98.9% agreement between the Accelerate Pheno™ System and the standard method. In addition, the Gram-positive AST gathered a 98.7% agreement comparing the same systems. The chance to rapidly provide precise MIC values is one of the last frontiers in clinical microbiology, especially in high-prevalence antimicrobial resistance areas.

State of the Management of Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms

In the past decade, the prevalence of multidrug-resistant gram-negative (MDR-GN) bacterial infections has increased significantly, leading to higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Treating these infections poses numerous challenges, particularly when selecting appropriate empiric therapy for critically ill patients for whom the margin for error is low. Fortunately, the availability of new therapies has improved the treatment landscape, offering safer and more effective options. However, there remains a need to establish and implement optimal clinical and therapeutic approaches for managing these infections. Here, we review strategies for identifying patients at risk for MDR-GN infections, propose a framework for the choice of empiric and definitive treatment, and explore effective multidisciplinary approaches to managing patients in the hospital while ensuring a safe transition to outpatient settings.

Bacteria-driven cancer therapy: Exploring advancements and challenges

Cancer, a serious fatal disease caused by the uncontrolled growth of cells, is the biggest challenge flagging around medicine and health fields. Conventionally, various treatments-based strategies such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and alternative cancer therapies possess drugs that cannot reach the cancerous tissues and make them toxic to noncancerous cells. Cancer immunotherapy has made outstanding achievements in reducing the chances of cancer. Our considerable attention towards cancer-directed immune responses and the mechanisms behind which immune cells kill cancer cells have progressively been helpful in the advancement of new therapies. Among them, bacteria-based cancer immunotherapy has achieved much more attention due to smart and robust mechanisms in activating the host anti-tumor response. Moreover, bacterial-based therapy can be utilized as a single monotherapy or in combination with multiple anticancer immunotherapies to accelerate productive clinical results. Herein, we comprehensively reviewed recent advancements, challenges, and future perspectives in developing bacterial-based cancer immunotherapies.

Antimicrobial Multidrug Resistance: Clinical Implications for Infection Management in Critically Ill Patients

The increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) worldwide represents a serious threat in the management of sepsis. Due to resistance to the most common antimicrobials prescribed, multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens have been associated with delays in adequate antimicrobial therapy leading to significant increases in mortality, along with prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) and increases in healthcare costs. In response to MDR infections and the delay of microbiological results, broad-spectrum antibiotics are frequently used in empirical antimicrobial therapy. This can contribute to the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, further promoting the development of resistance. Multiple measures have been suggested to combat AMR. This review will focus on describing the epidemiology and trends concerning MDR pathogens. Additionally, it will explore the crucial aspects of identifying patients susceptible to MDR infections and optimizing antimicrobial drug dosing, which are both pivotal considerations in the fight against AMR. Expert commentary: The increasing AMR in ICUs worldwide makes the empirical antibiotic therapy challenging in septic patients. An AMR surveillance program together with improvements in MDR identification based on patient risk stratification and molecular rapid diagnostic tools may further help tailoring antimicrobial therapies and avoid unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotics. Continuous infusions of antibiotics, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-based dosing regimens and combination therapy may contribute to optimizing antimicrobial therapy and limiting the emergence of resistance.

Priorities and Progress in Diagnostic Research by the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group

The advancement of infectious disease diagnostics, along with studies devoted to infections caused by gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, is a top scientific priority of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG). Diagnostic tests for infectious diseases are rapidly evolving and improving. However, the availability of rapid tests designed to determine antibacterial resistance or susceptibility directly in clinical specimens remains limited, especially for gram-negative organisms. Additionally, the clinical impact of many new tests, including an understanding of how best to use them to inform optimal antibiotic prescribing, remains to be defined. This review summarizes the recent work of the ARLG toward addressing these unmet needs in the diagnostics field and describes future directions for clinical research aimed at curbing the threat of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections.

Evaluation of the feasibility of EUCAST RAST using antimicrobial disks available in Japan

BACKGROUND

In November 2018, the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) established rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST), which could be performed directly on positive blood culture samples. Although concentrations of antimicrobial agents in several antimicrobial disks available in Japan are different from those recommended by the EUCAST, the feasibility of EUCAST RAST using antimicrobial disks available in Japan remains to be evaluated.

METHODS

Blood culture bottles spiked with 127 clinical isolates (65 Escherichia coli and 62 Klebsiella pneumoniae) were tested by RAST for cefotaxime (CTX), ceftazidime (CAZ), meropenem, and ciprofloxacin using antimicrobial disks available in Japan, and compared with a reference AST method using automated AST instrument (VITEK®2).

RESULTS

The overall category agreement (CA) for RAST using antimicrobial disks available in Japan was 96.3%, 96.8%, and 95.6% after 4, 6, and 8 h of incubations, respectively. However, the CAZ RAST for E. coli showed major error of 8.2% (8 h incubation) for the Sensi disk, 14.3% (6 h incubation), and 24.5% (8 h incubation) for the KB disk. The CTX RAST for K. pneumoniae showed 25% (4 h incubation) and 31.3% (4 h incubation) of very major error for the Sensi and KB disks, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The EUCAST RAST results for E. coli and K. pneumoniae using antimicrobial disks available in Japan suggest their usefulness, although modified RAST breakpoints are required for several antimicrobial agents.

From bottle to bedside: Implementation considerations and antimicrobial stewardship considerations for bloodstream infection rapid diagnostic testing

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs have been quick to adopt novel molecular rapid diagnostic technologies (mRDTs) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) to improve antimicrobial management. As such, most of the literature demonstrating the clinical and economic benefits of mRDTs for BSI is in the presence of active AMS intervention. Leveraging mRDTs to improve antimicrobial therapy for BSI is increasingly integral to AMS program activities. This narrative review discusses available and future mRDTs, the relationship between the clinical microbiology laboratory and AMS programs, and practical considerations for optimizing the use of these tools within a health system. Antimicrobial stewardship programs must work closely with their clinical microbiology laboratories to ensure that mRDTs are used to their fullest benefit while remaining cognizant of their limitations. As more mRDT instruments and panels become available and AMS programs continue to expand, future efforts must consider the expansion beyond traditional settings of large academic medical centers and how combinations of tools can further improve patient care.

Appropriateness of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy in Hospitalized Patients with Bacterial Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

The incidence of inappropriate and excessive empirical antibiotic therapy is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of different empirical antibiotic therapy prescriptions, related factors, and outcomes in hospitalized patients with bacterial infection.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed and patients with bacterial infection who were admitted between October 1, 2019, and September 30, 2020, were included. Multivariable analysis was performed by the logistic regression model.

Results

A total of 536 (42.6%) of the 1257 included patients received inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (IEAT), and 368 (29.3%) patients received appropriate but unnecessarily broad-spectrum empirical antibiotic therapy (AUEAT). MDRO (adjusted OR 2.932 [95% CI 2.201~3.905]; p < 0.001) and fever on admission (adjusted OR 0.592 [95% CI 0.415~0.844]; p = 0.004) were correlates of IEAT; sepsis (adjusted OR 2.342 [95% CI 1.371~3.999]; p = 0.002), age (adjusted OR 1.019 [95% CI 1.008~1.030]; p < 0.001), MDRO (adjusted OR 0.664 [95% CI 0.469~0.941]; p = 0.021), and urinary tract infection (adjusted OR 0.352 [95% CI 0.203~0.611]; p < 0.001) were correlates of AUEAT. Patients who received AUEAT were more likely to have a poor prognosis (63 [17.8%] vs 101 [27.4%]; p = 0.002). Both IEAT (median [IQR], 24,971 [13,135-70,155] vs 31,489 [14,894-101,082] CNY; p = 0.007) and AUEAT (median [IQR], 24,971 [13,135-70,155] vs 30,960 [16,475-90,881] CNY; p = 0.002) increased hospital costs. 45.3% (570/1257) of patients were infected with MDRO and 62.9% of them received IEAT.

Conclusion

Inappropriate and excessive empirical antibiotic use was widely prevalent among hospitalized patients. Either inappropriate or excessive use of antibiotics may increase the burden of healthcare costs, the latter of which may be associated with poor prognosis. Clinicians need to be more judicious in choosing antibiotic(s). The MDRO epidemic was severe, especially in patients who received IEAT. It is imperative to take effective measures to improve the current situation of antibiotic abuse and antimicrobial resistance.

Trends in mortality from infection among patients with hematologic malignancies: differences according to hematologic malignancy subtype

Background

Infection is the most important cause of non-relapse mortality in hematologic malignancy patients, leading to increased costs and prolonged hospitalization times. However, comprehensive and comparable reports on infection-specific mortality (ISM) trends in hematologic malignancy patients are lacking.

Objectives

We aimed to provide updated ISM trends and factors associated with ISM among hematologic malignancy patients.

Design

This is a retrospective study.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with the five most common hematologic malignancies from 1983 to 2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were included. Joinpoint regression was used to analyze mortality trends.

Results

ISM decreased beginning in 1983, 1988, and 1994, with yearly decreases of -2.1% for acute leukemia (AL), -1.3% for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and -14.3% for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). In contrast, ISM in patients with chronic leukemia (CL) and multiple myeloma (MM) increased dramatically beginning in 2000, with yearly increases of 2.8% and 3.3%, respectively. ISM rates were higher in males than in females across all hematologic malignancy subtypes. The mortality trends significantly differed according to race, age, sex, and stage, which could help in further etiological investigations. Moreover, male sex, older age at diagnosis, black race, and unmarried status were poor prognostic factors for ISM across all hematologic malignancy subtypes.

Conclusion

A promising downward trend in ISM in recent years occurred in patients with AL, HL, and NHL; however, ISM increased dramatically in patients with CL and MM. Our data suggest that risk assessment and careful infection monitoring are recommended for hematologic malignancy patients, particularly those with CL and MM.

Rapid Diagnostic Test Value and Implementation in Antimicrobial Stewardship Across Low-to-Middle and High-Income Countries: A Mixed-Methods Review

Despite technological advancements in infectious disease rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and use to direct therapy at the per-patient level, RDT utilisation in antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) is variable across low-to-middle income and high-income countries. Key insights from a panel of seven infectious disease experts from Colombia, Japan, Nigeria, Thailand, the UK, and the USA, combined with evidence from a literature review, were used to assess the value of RDTs in ASPs. From this, a value framework is proposed which aims to define the benefits of RDT use in ASPs, separate from per-patient benefits. Expert insights highlight that, to realise the value of RDTs within ASPs, effective implementation is key; actionable advice for choosing an RDT is proposed. Experts advocate the inclusion of RDTs in the World Health Organization Model List of essential in vitro diagnostics and in iterative development of national action plans.

Effects of antibiotic interaction on antimicrobial resistance development in wastewater

While wastewater is understood to be a critically important reservoir of antimicrobial resistance due to the presence of multiple antibiotic residues from industrial and agricultural runoff, there is little known about the effects of antibiotic interactions in the wastewater on the development of resistance. We worked to fill this gap in quantitative understanding of antibiotic interaction in constant flow environments by experimentally monitoring E. coli populations under subinhibitory concentrations of combinations of antibiotics with synergistic, antagonistic, and additive interactions. We then used these results to expand our previously developed computational model to account for the effects of antibiotic interaction. We found that populations grown under synergistic and antagonistic antibiotic conditions exhibited significant differences from predicted behavior. E. coli populations grown with synergistically interacting antibiotics developed less resistance than predicted, indicating that synergistic antibiotics may have a suppressive effect on resistance development. Furthermore E. coli populations grown with antagonistically interacting antibiotics showed an antibiotic ratio-dependent development of resistance, suggesting that not only antibiotic interaction, but relative concentration is important in predicting resistance development. These results provide critical insight for quantitatively understanding the effects of antibiotic interactions in wastewater and provide a basis for future studies in modelling resistance in these environments.

Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing in patients with bacteraemia due to Enterobacterales: an implementation study

AIMS OF THE STUDY

The goal of this descriptive study was to assess the performance as well as the extent of the clinical impact of rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing in patients with bacteraemia due to Enterobacterales. We also aimed to analyse how rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing influences clinical decision-making.

METHODS

This single-centre study conducted at the University Hospital of Zurich included data from all consecutive patients with Enterobacterales bacteraemia from November 2019 to October 2020. There was no control group. The primary outcome was the effect of rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing on antibiotic therapy (no adjustment, escalation to a broader-spectrum antibiotic or de-escalation to a narrower-spectrum antibiotic). Rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing results were further compared to susceptibility tests using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) standard methods and erroneous results were noted. Additionally, we investigated turnaround times for rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing and routine diagnostic testing.

RESULTS

We analysed 106 patients with 116 episodes of bacteraemia due to Enterobacterales, with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae being the most frequent isolates. Almost 8% of pathogens were multidrug resistant. Rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed category agreement in 98.4% of all interpretable cases. A significant reduction of more than 20 h in turnaround times could be achieved with rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing compared to the routine diagnostic workflow. In the majority of cases, rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing had no effect, given that the empirical therapy was already correct or circumstances did not allow for de-escalation. In 38.8% of cases, antimicrobial therapy was adjusted, whereas eight cases were de-escalated based on rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing may be a valuable and safe way to accelerate diagnosis. In particular, time to suitable therapy can be shortened in cases of incorrect therapy. However, physicians are reluctant to de-escalate antibiotic therapy based on rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing alone, limiting its impact in everyday clinics. To further explore the potential of rapid automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing, a stringent/compulsory antibiotic stewardship programme would be a valuable next step.

Large-Scale Clinical Evaluation of Rapid Blood Culture Identification Panels for Bloodstream Infections at a Tertiary Hospital

The prompt implementation of optimal antibacterial therapy through the rapid identification of the causative organisms is essential for improving outcomes for critically ill patients with bloodstream infections. We evaluated the clinical performance of the FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel for rapidly identifying causative pathogens in the bloodstream using large-scale clinical samples. We analyzed the results of identification using a BCID panel performed on 2005 positive blood culture bottles from September 2019 to June 2022. Pathogen detection efficiency and interval from Gram staining to identification using the BCID panel were compared to those of conventional identification systems—VITEK MS MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometer and Vitek2—and antibiotic susceptibility testing—Vitek2. We detected 2167 isolates from 2005 positive blood culture bottles. In these isolates, the BCID panel showed 93% full agreement—both organisms and antimicrobial resistance genes were matched, and no off-target organisms were detected. Species-level discordance was found in 0.6% of tests. Sixty-five isolates (3.0%) were only detected by BCID, whereas 22 isolates (1.0%) from the on-target panel were not detected by BCID. This large-scale study demonstrated that the BCID panel was a reliable and rapid identification method for directly identifying bloodstream pathogens in a positive blood culture.

Effects of Antibiotic Interaction on Antimicrobial Resistance Development in Wastewater

While wastewater is understood to be a critically important reservoir of antimicrobial resistance due to the presence of multiple antibiotic residues from industrial and agricultural runoff, there is little known about the effects of antibiotic interactions in the wastewater on the development of resistance. We worked to fill this gap in quantitative understanding of antibiotic interaction in constant flow environments by experimentally monitoring E. coli populations under subinhibitory concentrations of combinations of antibiotics with synergistic, antagonistic, and additive interactions. We then used these results to expand our previously developed computational model to account for the complex effects of antibiotic interaction. We found that while E. coli populations grown in additively interacting antibiotic combinations grew predictably according to the previously developed model, those populations grown under synergistic and antagonistic antibiotic conditions exhibited significant differences from predicted behavior. E. coli populations grown in the condition with synergistically interacting antibiotics developed less resistance than predicted, indicating that synergistic antibiotics may have a suppressive effect on antimicrobial resistance development. Furthermore E. coli populations grown in the condition with antagonistically interacting antibiotics showed an antibiotic ratio-dependent development of resistance, suggesting that not only antibiotic interaction, but relative concentration is important in predicting resistance development. These results provide critical insight for quantitatively understanding the effects of antibiotic interactions in wastewater and provide a basis for future studies in modelling resistance in these environments.

Importance

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global threat to public health expected to impact 10 million people by 2050, driving mortality rates globally and with a disproportionate effect on low- and middle-income countries. Communities in proximity to wastewater settings and environmentally contaminated surroundings are at particular risk due to resistance stemming from antibiotic residues from industrial and agricultural runoff. Currently, there is a limited quantitative and mechanistic understanding of the evolution of AMR in response to multiple interacting antibiotic residues in constant flow environments. Using an integrated computational and experimental methods, we find that interactions between antibiotic residues significantly affect the development of resistant bacterial populations.

Bacterial Infections and Cancer: Exploring This Association And Its Implications for Cancer Patients

Bacterial infections are common in the etiology of human diseases owing to the ubiquity of bacteria. Such infections promote the development of periodontal disease, bacterial pneumonia, typhoid, acute gastroenteritis, and diarrhea in susceptible hosts. These diseases may be resolved using antibiotics/antimicrobial therapy in some hosts. However, other hosts may be unable to eliminate the bacteria, allowing them to persist for long durations and significantly increasing the carrier's risk of developing cancer over time. Indeed, infectious pathogens are modifiable cancer risk factors, and through this comprehensive review, we highlight the complex relationship between bacterial infections and the development of several cancer types. For this review, searches were performed on the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases encompassing the entirety of 2022. Based on our investigation, we found several critical associations, of which some are causative: Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum are associated with periodontal disease, Salmonella spp., Clostridium perfringens, Escherichia coli, Campylobacter spp., and Shigella are associated with gastroenteritis. Helicobacter pylori infection is implicated in the etiology of gastric cancer, and persistent Chlamydia infections present a risk factor for the development of cervical carcinoma, especially in patients with the human papillomavirus (HPV) coinfection. Salmonella typhi infections are linked with gallbladder cancer, and Chlamydia pneumoniae infection is implicated in lung cancer, etc. This knowledge helps identify the adaptation strategies used by bacteria to evade antibiotic/antimicrobial therapy. The article also sheds light on the role of antibiotics in cancer treatment, the consequences of their use, and strategies for limiting antibiotic resistance. Finally, the dual role of bacteria in cancer development as well as in cancer therapy is briefly discussed, as this is an area that may help to facilitate the development of novel microbe-based therapeutics as a means of securing improved outcomes.

24/7 workflow for bloodstream infection diagnostics in microbiology laboratories: the first step to improve clinical management

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the impact of an uninterrupted workflow regarding blood cultures on turnaround time and antibiotic prescription.

METHODS

Monomicrobial episodes of bacteremia were retrospectively evaluated before and after a continuous 24/7 workflow was implemented in our clinical microbiology laboratory (pre- and post-intervention periods; PREIP and POSTIP). Primary outcome was the time from specimen collection to the first change in antibiotic therapy. Secondary outcomes included the time from specimen collection to effective antibiotic therapy and to antibiotic susceptibility testing results (or turnaround time), as well as hospital length of stay and all-cause mortality at 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 548 episodes of bacteremia were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in PREIP and POSTIP regarding patient characteristics and causative bacteria. In POSTIP, the mean time to the first change in antibiotic therapy was reduced by 10.4 h (p<0.001). The time to effective antibiotic therapy and the turnaround time were respectively reduced by 4.8 h (p<0.001) and 5.1 h (p=0.006) in POSTIP. There was no difference in mean hospital length of stay or mortality between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Around the clock processing of blood cultures allows for a reduction in turnaround time, which in turn reduces the delay until effective antibiotic therapy prescription.

Rapid Detection of Carbapenemase and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria Directly from Positive Blood Cultures Using a Novel Protocol

BACKGROUND

Early and adequate antibiotic treatment is the cornerstone of improving clinical outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections (BSI). Delays in appropriate antimicrobial therapy have catastrophic consequences for patients with BSI. Microbiological characterization of multi-drug resistant pathogens (MDRP) allows clinicians to provide appropriate treatments. Current microbiologic techniques may take up to 96 h to identify causative pathogens and their resistant patterns. Therefore, there is an important need to develop rapid diagnostic strategies for MDRP. We tested a modified protocol to detect carbapenemase and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) from positive blood cultures.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with bacteremia. We developed a modified protocol using the HB&L^® system to detect MDRP. The operational characteristics were analyzed for each test (HB&L-ESBL/AmpC^® and HB&L-Carbapenemase^® kits). The kappa coefficient, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), likelihood ratios (LR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and reduction in identification time of this novel method were calculated.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients with BSI were included in the study. A total of 161 positive blood cultures were analyzed. Escherichia coli (50%, 81/161) was the most frequently identified pathogen, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (15%, 24/161) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8%, 13/161). Thirty-three percent of isolations had usual resistance patterns. However, 34/161 (21%) of identified pathogens were producers of carbapenemases and 21/161 (13%) of extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Concordance between our HB&L^® modified protocol and the traditional method was 99% (159/161). Finally, identification times were significantly shorter using our HB&L^®-modified protocol than traditional methods: median (IQR) 19 h (18, 22) vs. 61 h (60, 64), p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we provide novel evidence that using our HB&L^®-modified protocol is an effective strategy to reduce the time to detect MDRP producers of carbapenemases or extended-spectrum β-lactamases, with an excellent concordance rate when compared to the gold standard. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to determine whether this method may improve clinical outcomes.

Pattern of Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Antimicrobial Treatment of Neonates Admitted with Suspected Sepsis in a Teaching Hospital in Ghana, 2021

Neonatal sepsis is a life-threatening emergency, and empirical antimicrobial prescription is common. In this cross-sectional study of neonates admitted with suspected sepsis in a teaching hospital in Ghana from January-December 2021, we described antimicrobial prescription patterns, compliance with national standard treatment guidelines (STG), blood culture testing, antimicrobial resistance patterns and treatment outcomes. Of the 549 neonates admitted with suspected sepsis, 283 (52%) were males. Overall, 529 (96%) received empirical antimicrobials. Most neonates (n = 407, 76.9%) were treated empirically with cefuroxime + gentamicin, while cefotaxime was started as a modified treatment in the majority of neonates (46/68, 67.6%). Only one prescription complied with national STGs. Samples of 257 (47%) neonates underwent blood culture testing, of which 70 (27%) were positive. Isolates were predominantly Gram-positive bacteria, with coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Staphylococcus aureus accounting for 79% of the isolates. Isolates showed high resistance to most penicillins, while resistance to aminoglycosides and quinolones was relatively low. The majority of neonates (n = 497, 90.5%) were discharged after successfully completing treatment, while 50 (9%) neonates died during treatment. Strengthening of antimicrobial stewardship programmes, periodic review of STGs and increased uptake of culture and sensitivity testing are needed to improve management of sepsis.

In vitro antibacterial effect of probiotics against Carbapenamase-producing multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates, Cairo, Egypt

Background

Searching for a non-antibiotic therapeutic option such as probiotics is gaining momentum nowadays. We aimed to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial ability of cell-free supernatant (CFS) of selected Lactobacillus strains (with probiotic properties) against clinical isolates of OXA-48-producing multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae separately and in combination with cefoperazone antibiotic.

Methods

Over a period of 8 months, a cross-sectional experimental study involving 590 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates was done. Our study took place at The Specialized Pediatric Teaching Hospital of Cairo University. Of the 590 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates collected from blood cultures, pus, endotracheal aspirates, and pleural fluid, only 50 unrepeated clinical isolates of MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae-producing OXA-48-like detected by CHROMID® OXA-48 (bioMérieux, France) were selected for our study. After determining the minimal inhibitory concentration of CFS of ten Lactobacillus strains and cefoperazone each, the synergistic effect of both was tested.

Results

Among ten tested Lactobacillus spp., a significant increase in the mean value of inhibition zone diameter with CFS of L. helveticus (14.32 mm) and L. rhamnosus (13.3 mm) was detected separately. On the contrary, an antagonistic activity against all tested isolates was detected upon combination of Lactobacilli with cefoperazone (512 μg/ml). The mean value of inhibition zone diameter of L. helveticus CFS+ cefoperazone was (11.0 mm) and for L. rhamnosus CFS+ cefoperazone was (10.88 mm) (p value <0.001).

Conclusion

The antimicrobial efficiency of using CFS of Lactobacillus species separately indicates that these therapies may be a substitute treatment strategy against MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Intervention Associated with the Rapid Identification of Microorganisms by MALDI-TOF and Detection of Resistance Genes in ICU Patients with Gram-Negative Bacteremia

Combination of strategies for rapid diagnostics tests (RDT) with real-time intervention could improve patient outcomes. We aimed to assess the impact on clinical outcomes, antimicrobial consumption, and costs in patients with gram-negative bacteremia. We designed a quasi-experimental study among 216 episodes of gram-negative bacteremia using RDT (MALDI-TOF and detection of resistance genes) directly from blood culture bottles combined with real-time communication of results. Our study did not demonstrate impact on 30-day mortality (25% vs. 35%; p = 0.115). Hospital and ICU length of stay were significantly lower in the intervention period ((44 days vs. 39 days; p = 0.005) and (17 days vs. 13 days; p = 0.033)), respectively. The antimicrobial consumption was 1381 DOT/1000 days in the pre-intervention period compared to 1262 DOT/1000 days in the intervention period (p = 0.032). Antimicrobials against gram-positive and carbapenems had a significantly reduced consumption in the intervention period. Our intervention showed no impact on 30 days-mortality, but demonstrated an impact on hospital and ICU length of stay, as well as antimicrobials consumption and costs. Knowledge of resistance genes adds value and information for safe decision making that can result in direct and indirect benefits related to the economic burden of antibiotic overuse and bacterial resistance.

Early appropriate diagnostics and treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections

The term difficult-to-treat resistance has been recently coined to identify Gram-negative bacteria exhibiting resistance to all fluoroquinolones and all β-lactam categories, including carbapenems. Such bacteria are posing serious challenges to clinicians trying to identify the best therapeutic option for any given patient. Delayed appropriate therapy has been associated with worse outcomes including increase in length of stay, increase in total in-hospital costs and ∼20% increase in the risk of in-hospital mortality. In addition, time to appropriate antibiotic therapy has been shown to be an independent predictor of 30 day mortality in patients with resistant organisms. Improving and anticipating aetiological diagnosis through optimizing not only the identification of phenotypic resistance to antibiotic classes/agents, but also the identification of specific resistance mechanisms, would have a major impact on reducing the frequency and duration of inappropriate early antibiotic therapy. In light of these considerations, the present paper reviews the increasing need for rapid diagnosis of bacterial infections and efficient laboratory workflows to confirm diagnoses and facilitate prompt de-escalation to targeted therapy, in line with antimicrobial stewardship principles. Rapid diagnostic tests currently available and future perspectives for their use are discussed. Early appropriate diagnostics and treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections require a multidisciplinary approach that includes multiple different diagnostic methods and further consensus of algorithms, protocols and guidelines to select the optimal antibiotic therapy.

Transmission of gram-negative antibiotic-resistant bacteria following differing exposure to antibiotic-resistance reservoirs in a rural community: a modelling study for bloodstream infections

Exposure to community reservoirs of gram-negative antibiotic-resistant bacteria (GN-ARB) genes poses substantial health risks to individuals, complicating potential infections. Transmission networks and population dynamics remain unclear, particularly in resource-poor communities. We use a dynamic compartment model to assess GN-ARB transmission quantitatively, including the susceptible, colonised, infected, and removed populations at the community-hospital interface. We used two side streams to distinguish between individuals at high- and low-risk exposure to community ARB reservoirs. The model was calibrated using data from a cross-sectional cohort study (N = 357) in Chile and supplemented by existing literature. Most individuals acquired ARB from the community reservoirs (98%) rather than the hospital. High exposure to GN-ARB reservoirs was associated with 17% and 16% greater prevalence for GN-ARB carriage in the hospital and community settings, respectively. The higher exposure has led to 16% more infections and attributed mortality. Our results highlight the need for early-stage identification and testing capability of bloodstream infections caused by GN-ARB through a faster response at the community level, where most GN-ARB are likely to be acquired. Increasing treatment rates for individuals colonised or infected by GN-ARB and controlling the exposure to antibiotic consumption and GN-ARB reservoirs, is crucial to curve GN-ABR transmission.

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry rapid pathogen identification and outcomes of patients with bloodstream infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

There was inconsistent evidence regarding the use of matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (MALDI‐TOF MS) for microorganism identification with/without antibiotic stewardship team (AST) and the clinical outcome of patients with bloodstream infections (BSI). In a systematic review and meta‐analysis, we evaluated the effectiveness of rapid microbial identification by MALDI‐TOF MS with and without AST on clinical outcomes. We searched PubMed and EMBASE databases from inception to 1 February 2022 to identify pre–post and parallel comparative studies that evaluated the use of MALDI‐TOF MS for microorganism identification. Pooled effect estimates were derived using the random‐effects model. Twenty‐one studies with 14,515 patients were meta‐analysed. Compared with conventional phenotypic methods, MALDI‐TOF MS was associated with a 23% reduction in mortality (RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.66; 0.90; I² = 35.9%; 13 studies); 5.07‐h reduction in time to effective antibiotic therapy (95% CI: −5.83; −4.31; I² = 95.7%); 22.86‐h reduction in time to identify microorganisms (95% CI: −23.99; −21.74; I² = 91.6%); 0.73‐day reduction in hospital stay (95% CI: −1.30; −0.16; I² = 53.1%); and US$4140 saving in direct hospitalization cost (95% CI: $‐8166.75; $‐113.60; I² = 66.1%). No significant heterogeneity sources were found, and no statistical evidence for publication bias was found. Rapid pathogen identification by MALDI‐TOF MS with or without AST was associated with reduced mortality and improved outcomes of BSI, and may be cost‐effective among patients with BSI.

Impact of a laboratory developed phenotypic rapid susceptibility test directly from positive blood cultures on time to narrowest effective therapy in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia: a prospective randomized trial

Background

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is often needed prior to antimicrobial optimization for patients with gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSIs). Rapid AST (rAST) in combination with antimicrobial stewardship (AS) may decrease time to administration of narrower antibiotics.

Methods

This was a prospective, nonblinded, randomized trial evaluating the impact of a phenotypic rAST method vs conventional AST (cAST) in hospitalized patients with GN-BSI and source control. The primary outcome was time to narrowest effective therapy.

Results

Two hundred seventy-four patients were randomized and 205 underwent analysis (97 cAST, 108 rAST). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to susceptibility results was 23 hours shorter in the rAST group (cAST: 62 [59–67] hours vs rAST: 39 [IQR, 35–46] hours; P < .001). Median (IQR) time to narrowest effective therapy was similar between groups (cAST: 73 [44–138] hours vs rAST: 64 [42–92] hours; P = .10). Median (IQR) time to narrowest effective therapy was significantly shorter in a prespecified subgroup of patients not initially on narrowest therapy and during AS working hours (cAST: 93 [56–154] hours vs rAST: 62 [43–164] hours; P = .004). Significant decreases were observed in median (IQR) time to oral therapy (cAST: 126 [76–209] hours vs rAST: 91 [66–154] hours; P = .02) and median (IQR) length of hospital stay (cAST: 7 [4–13] days vs rAST: 5 [4–8] days; P = .04).

Conclusions

In patients with GN-BSI, rAST did not significantly decrease time to narrowest effective therapy but did decrease time to oral antibiotics and length of hospital stay. Rapid AST using existing microbiology platforms has potential to optimize patient outcomes.

Conceptual framework of antibiotic stewardship programs in reducing ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Today, the phenomenon of antibiotic resistance has become one of the main concerns of health system around the world. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are considered as the most important strategy in optimizing antibiotic consumption, which in turn reduce the emergence of multidrug/extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) microorganisms, as well as reducing mortality and healthcare costs. However, the effectiveness of APSs in controlling the spread of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae has not been investigated. The pooled odds ratio for the effectiveness of ASPs in reducing ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70-0.98; P value: 0.03); our results showed that in group with implemented ASPs, the prevalence of infection associated with these bacteria had been reduced by 11.8%. Overall, antimicrobial stewardship strategies are significantly effective in reducing ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections. The present study concluded that a comprehensive stewardship program will certainly reduce the mortality rate, as well as hospitalization stay and treatment costs. In general, our findings strongly support the performance of ASPs in healthcare centers.

Diagnosis and management of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria: guideline endorsed by the Italian Society of Infection and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT), the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA), the Italian Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (GISA), the Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists (AMCLI) and the Italian Society of Microbiology (SIM)

Management of patients with infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach to achieve successful clinical outcomes. The aim of this paper is to provide recommendations for the diagnosis and optimal management of these infections, with a focus on targeted antibiotic therapy. The document was produced by a panel of experts nominated by the five endorsing Italian societies, namely the Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists (AMCLI), the Italian Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (GISA), the Italian Society of Microbiology (SIM), the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT) and the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA). Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) questions about microbiological diagnosis, pharmacological strategies and targeted antibiotic therapy were addressed for the following pathogens: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. A systematic review of the literature published from January 2011 to November 2020 was guided by the PICO strategy. As data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were expected to be limited, observational studies were also reviewed. The certainty of evidence was classified using the GRADE approach. Recommendations were classified as strong or conditional. Detailed recommendations were formulated for each pathogen. The majority of available RCTs have serious risk of bias, and many observational studies have several limitations, including small sample size, retrospective design and presence of confounders. Thus, some recommendations are based on low or very-low certainty of evidence. Importantly, these recommendations should be continually updated to reflect emerging evidence from clinical studies and real-world experience.

Microbiology of bile aspirates obtained at ERCP in patients with suspected acute cholangitis

BACKGROUND

The cornerstone of treatment for acute cholangitis is source control with biliary drainage and early antibiotics. The primary aim of this study was to describe the microbiology of bile aspirate pathogens obtained at the time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients suspected of having acute cholangitis.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, patients were included if a bile aspirate was collected at ERCP for suspicion of acute cholangitis, from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2016.

RESULTS

There were 721 ERCP procedures for suspected acute cholangitis with bile culture results, with 662 positive bile cultures (91.8 %). Pathogens included: Enterococcus species (spp.) 448 (67.7 %); Klebsiella spp. 295 (44.6 %); Escherichia coli 269 (40.6 %); Pseudomonas spp. 52 (7.9 %); and anaerobes 64 (9.7 %). Susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae and E.coli isolates to ciprofloxacin was 88 % and 64 %, respectively. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and carbapenem resistance were found in 7.9 % and 3.6 % of Enterobacteriaceae, respectively. There were 437 concurrent blood cultures, of which 174 were positive (39.8 % of cultures drawn). Prior biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) was evident in 459 ERCP cases (63.7 %), and was associated with increased frequency of Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp., and Enterococcus spp. Prior biliary ES significantly increased the probability of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE).

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of bile cultures (91.8 %) were positive. The susceptibilities of E.coli and K.pneumoniae to ciprofloxacin are lower than historically noted. A notable portion of cultures contained pathogenic drug-resistant organisms. Prior biliary ES is associated with a higher frequency of certain organisms and higher frequency of VRE.

Metabolic preference assay for rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) cause >500,000 infections and >80,000 deaths per year in North America. The length of time between the onset of symptoms and administration of appropriate antimicrobials is directly linked to mortality rates. It currently takes 2–5 days to identify BSI pathogens and measure their susceptibility to antimicrobials – a timeline that directly contributes to preventable deaths. To address this, we demonstrate a rapid metabolic preference assay (MPA) that uses the pattern of metabolic fluxes observed in ex-vivo microbial cultures to identify common pathogens and determine their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. In a head-to-head race with a leading platform (VITEK 2, BioMérieux) used in diagnostic laboratories, MPA decreases testing timelines from 40 hours to under 20. If put into practice, this assay could reduce septic shock mortality and reduce the use of broad spectrum antibiotics.

It is currently slow to identify bloodstream infection pathogens. Here the authors report a rapid metabolic preference assay that uses the pattern of metabolic fluxes observed in ex-vivo microbial cultures to identify common pathogens and determine their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles.

Faster infection diagnostics for intensive care unit (ICU) patients

INTRODUCTION

: The patient admitted to intensive care units (ICU) is critically ill, to some extent immunosuppressed, with a high risk of infection, sometimes by multidrug-resistant microorganisms. In this context, the intensivist expects from the microbiology service quick and understandable information so that appropriate antimicrobial treatment for that particular patient and infection can be initiated.

AREAS COVERED

: In this review of recent literature (2015-2021), we identified diagnostic methods for the most prevalent infections in these patients through a search of the databases Pubmed, evidence-based medicine online, York University reviewers group, Cochrane, MBE-Trip, and Sumsearch using the terms: adult, clinical laboratory techniques, critical care, early diagnosis, microbiology, molecular diagnostic techniques, spectrometry and metagenomics.

EXPERT OPINION

: There has been an exponential surge in diagnostic systems used directly on blood and other samples to expedite microbial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of pathogens. Few studies have thus far assessed their clinical impact; final outcomes will also depend on preanalytical and post-analytical factors. Besides, many of the resistance mechanisms cannot yet be detected with molecular techniques, which impairs the prediction of the actual resistance phenotype.

Nonetheless, this is an exciting field with much yet to explore.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Gram positive cocci towards vancomycin using scanning electron microscopy

•

SEM-based method can be applied for rapid phenotypic AST on Gram-positive cocci towards 2 vancomycin based on morphological changes 3.

•

The ratio of septa as a marker of bacterial division and size of grape-like clusters enabled the 4 profiling of E. faecalis, E. faecium and S. aureus after brief incubation with vancomycin 5.

•

SEM-AST strategy showed the feasibility of detecting antibiotic susceptibility or 6 resistance on Gram-positive cocci within one hour of exposition to vancomycin 7.

The rapid detection of resistant bacteria has become a challenge for microbiologists worldwide. Numerous pathogens that cause nosocomial infections are still being treated empirically and have developed resistance mechanisms against key antibiotics. Thus, one of the challenges for researchers has been to develop rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) to detect resistant isolates, ensuring better antibiotic stewardship. In this study, we established a proof-of-concept for a new strategy of phenotypic AST on Gram-positive cocci towards vancomycin using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Our study evaluated the profiling of Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium and Staphylococcus aureus after brief incubation with vancomycin. Sixteen isolates were analysed aiming to detect ultrastructural modifications at set timepoints, comparing bacteria with and without vancomycin. After optimising slides preparation and micrographs acquisition, two analytical strategies were used. The high magnification micrographs served to analyse the division of cocci based on the ratio of septa, along with the bacterial size. Susceptible strains with vancomycin showed a reduced septa percentage and the average surface area was consequently double that of the controls. The resistant bacteria revealed multiple septa occurring at advanced timepoints. Low magnification micrographs made it possible to quantify the pixels at different timepoints, confirming the profiling of cocci towards vancomycin. This new phenotypic AST strategy proved to be a promising tool to discriminate between resistant and susceptible cocci within an hour of contact with vancomycin. The analysis strategies applied here would potentially allow the creation of artificial intelligence algorithms for septa detection and bacterial quantification, subsequently creating a rapid automated SEM-AST assay.

Impact of rapid susceptibility testing on antimicrobial therapy and clinical outcomes in Gram-negative bloodstream infections

Background

Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (rAST) has the potential to improve care of bloodstream infections.

Objectives

The aim of this service evaluation was to assess the impact of rAST on antimicrobial therapy and clinical outcomes in patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection.

Methods

A prospective service evaluation was conducted from March 2018 to December 2018. A rAST system (Alfred 60AST) was run Monday–Friday before midday and results were communicated to clinicians on the same day as positive blood culture, with subsequent conventional AST performed. Times to antibiotic therapy and clinical outcomes were compared between rAST and conventional AST.

Results

One hundred and ninety-one patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia were included (93 in the rapid group and 98 in the conventional group). Aminoglycoside combination therapy was stopped earlier in the rapid group [32 h (0–795) versus 54 h (4–216), P = 0.002]. The median time to optimal antibiotic based on AST results was significantly shorter than that in the conventional group [50 h (10–339) versus 69.5 h (20–872), P = 0.034]. In the subgroup of patients on ineffective empirical antibiotic, time to effective antibiotic was shorter in the rapid group [39.5 h (32–97) versus 57 h (49–83), P = 0.036]. No differences were found in 28 day mortality or length of stay.

Conclusions

Rapid susceptibility testing resulted in faster discontinuation of aminoglycosides and a shorter time to starting effective and optimal antibiotic when compared with conventional AST results. rAST has potential clinical benefits and points to the need for larger future studies in areas of high antibiotic resistance.

Impact of early antimicrobial stewardship intervention in patients with positive blood cultures: results from a randomized comparative study: Impact of stewardship on BSI outcomes

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship intervention (ASI) appears necessary to realize the full benefits of rapid diagnostic technologies in clinical practice. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between early ASI paired with MALDI-TOF compared to MALDI-TOF with standard of care (SOC) reporting in patients with positive blood cultures.

METHODS

Adult patients with positive blood cultures and organism speciation via MALDI-TOF admitted between 2/2015 and 9/2015 were randomized to ASI or SOC in a 1:1 fashion. Patients admitted for at least 48 hours following positive culture were included in analyses. ASI was defined as a clinical assessment by a stewardship team member with non-binding treatment recommendations offered to the primary team. The primary outcome was time to definitive therapy. Secondary outcomes included post-culture length of stay (LOS), time to first change in antibiotics, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were included in analyses (76 in the ASI group and 73 in the SOC group). ASI and SOC arms did not differ according to age, sex, comorbidities, or severity of illness. Gram-positive organisms were common in both SOC and ASI arms (74.0 vs 61.8%, p=0.11). Time-to-definitive therapy was reduced, on average, by 30.3 hours in the ASI group (71.6 vs. 41.3 hours, p=0.01). Hospital LOS following the first positive blood culture was significantly shorter in the ASI group (8.7 vs. 11.2 days, p=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

ASI combined with MALDI-TOF reduced the time to definitive therapy, time to first change in antibiotics, and was associated with a shorter post-culture LOS.

Impact of Direct From Blood Culture Identification of Pathogens Paired With Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in a Pediatric Hospital

OBJECTIVE

Identification of organisms directly from positive blood culture by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has the potential for improved clinical outcomes through earlier organism identification and shorter time to appropriate clinical intervention. The uses of this technology in pediatric patients and its impact in this patient population have not been well described.

METHODS

Direct from positive blood culture organism identification via MALDI-TOF was implemented in September 2019. A quality improvement project was performed to assess its impact on admissions for contaminant blood cultures and time to effective and optimal antimicrobials and clinical decision-making. A pre- and post-implementation retrospective review for consecutive September through February time periods, was conducted on patients with positive monomicrobial blood cultures. Statistics were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U and χ² tests.

RESULTS

One hundred nineteen patients with 131 unique blood cultures (65 in pre- and 66 in post-implementation) were identified. Time to identification was shorter, median 35.4 hours (IQR, 22.7-54.3) versus 42.3 hours (IQR, 36.5-49) in post- and pre-groups, respectively (p = 0.02). Patients were less likely to be admitted for a contaminated blood culture in the post-implementation, 26% versus 11% in the pre-implementation (p = 0.03) group. In patients treated for bacteremia, there was a shorter time to optimal therapy from Gram stain reporting in the post-implementation (median 42.7 hours [IQR, 27.2-72]) versus pre-implementation (median 60.8 hours [IQR, 42.9-80.6]) (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Direct from positive blood culture identification by MALDI-TOF decreased time to effective and optimal antimicrobials and decreased unnecessary admission in pediatric patients for contaminated blood cultures.

Mathematical model of the cost-effectiveness of the BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel molecular rapid diagnostic test compared with conventional methods for identification of Escherichia coli bloodstream infections

BACKGROUND

Gram-negative pathogens, such as Escherichia coli, are common causes of bloodstream infections (BSIs) and increasingly demonstrate antimicrobial resistance. Molecular rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) offer faster pathogen identification and susceptibility results, but higher costs compared with conventional methods. We determined the cost-effectiveness of the BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel, as a type of mRDT, compared with conventional methods in the identification of E. coli BSIs.

METHODS

We constructed a decision analytic model comparing BCID with conventional methods in the identification and susceptibility testing of hospitalized patients with E. coli BSIs from the perspective of the public healthcare payer. Model inputs were obtained from published literature. Cost-effectiveness was calculated by determining the per-patient admission cost, the QALYs garnered and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) where applicable. Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analyses and one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the model. All costs reflect 2019 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

The Monte Carlo probabilistic analyses resulted in cost savings ($27 070.83 versus $35 649.81) and improved QALYs (8.65 versus 7.10) in favour of BCID. At a willingness to pay up to $100 000, BCID had a 72.6%-83.8% chance of being cost-effective. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed length of stay and cost per day of hospitalization to have the most substantial impact on costs and QALYs.

CONCLUSIONS

BCID was found to be cost-saving when used to diagnose E. coli BSI compared with conventional testing. Cost savings were most influenced by length of stay and cost per day of hospitalization.

Real-World Impact of the Accelerate PhenoTest ® BC Kit on patients with bloodstream infections in IOAS (Improving Outcomes and Antimicrobial Stewardship): A Quasi-Experimental Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. The IOAS (Improving Outcomes and Antimicrobial Stewardship) study seeks to evaluate the impact of the Accelerate PhenoTest® BC Kit (AXDX) on antimicrobial use and clinical outcomes in BSIs.

METHODS

This multicenter, quasi-experimental study compared clinical and antimicrobial stewardship metrics, prior to and after implementation of AXDX testing, to evaluate the impact this technology has on patients with BSI. Laboratory and clinical data from hospitalized patients with BSI (excluding contaminants) were compared between two arms, one that underwent testing on AXDX (post-AXDX) and one that underwent alternative organism identification and susceptibility testing (pre-AXDX). The primary outcomes were time to optimal therapy (TTOT) within 96 hours of blood culture positivity and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 854 patients with BSI (435 pre-AXDX, 419 post-AXDX) were included. Median TTOT was 17.2 hours shorter in the post-AXDX arm (23.7 hours) compared to the pre-AXDX arm (40.9 hours; P<0.0001). Compared with pre-AXDX, median time to first antimicrobial modification (24.2 versus 13.9 hours; P<0.0001) and first antimicrobial de-escalation (36.0 versus 27.2 hours; P=0.0004) were shorter in the post-AXDX arm. Mortality (8.7% pre-AXDX versus 6.0% post-AXDX), length of stay (7.0 pre-AXDX versus 6.5 days post-AXDX), and adverse drug events were not significantly different between arms. Length of stay was shorter in the post-AXDX arm (5.4 versus 6.4 days; P=0.03) among patients with Gram-negative bacteremia.

CONCLUSIONS

For BSIs, use of AXDX was associated with significant decreases in TTOT, first antimicrobial modification, and time to antimicrobial de-escalation.

Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinical Impact of RAPid IDentification and Susceptibility Testing for Gram-negative Bacteremia: RAPIDS-GN

BACKGROUND

Rapid blood culture diagnostics are of unclear benefit for patients with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing outcomes of patients with GNB BSIs who had blood culture testing with standard-of-care (SOC) culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) vs rapid organism identification (ID) and phenotypic AST using the Accelerate Pheno System (RAPID).

METHODS

Patients with positive blood cultures with Gram stains showing GNB were randomized to SOC testing with antimicrobial stewardship (AS) review or RAPID with AS. The primary outcome was time to first antibiotic modification within 72 hours of randomization.

RESULTS

Of 500 randomized patients, 448 were included (226 SOC, 222 RAPID). Mean (standard deviation) time to results was faster for RAPID than SOC for organism ID (2.7 [1.2] vs 11.7 [10.5] hours; P < .001) and AST (13.5 [56] vs 44.9 [12.1] hours; P < .001). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to first antibiotic modification was faster in the RAPID arm vs the SOC arm for overall antibiotics (8.6 [2.6-27.6] vs 14.9 [3.3-41.1] hours; P = .02) and gram-negative antibiotics (17.3 [4.9-72] vs 42.1 [10.1-72] hours; P < .001). Median (IQR) time to antibiotic escalation was faster in the RAPID arm vs the SOC arm for antimicrobial-resistant BSIs (18.4 [5.8-72] vs 61.7 [30.4-72] hours; P = .01). There were no differences between the arms in patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid organism ID and phenotypic AST led to faster changes in antibiotic therapy for gram-negative BSIs.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT03218397.

Direct detection of ESKAPEc pathogens from whole blood using the T2Bacteria Panel allows early antimicrobial stewardship intervention in patients with sepsis

In the microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI), blood culture (BC) is considered the gold standard test despite its limitations such as low sensitivity and slow turnaround time. A new FDA-cleared and CE-marked platform utilizing magnetic resonance to detect amplified DNA of the six most common and/or problematic BSI pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli; referred to as ESKAPEc) is available and may shorten the time to diagnosis and potentially improve antimicrobial utilization. Whole blood samples from hospitalized patients with clinical signs of sepsis were analyzed using the T2Bacteria Panel (T2Biosystems) and compared to simultaneously collected BC. Discrepant results were evaluated based on clinical infection criteria, combining supporting culture results and the opinion of treating physicians. A total of 55 samples from 53 patients were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of the T2Bacteria panel was 94% (16 out of 17 detections of T2Bacteria-targeted organisms) and 100%, respectively, with 36.4% (8 of 22) causes of BSI detected only by this method. The T2Bacteria Panel detected pathogens on average 55 hours faster than standard BC. In our study, 9 of 15 patients with positive T2Bacteria Panel results received early-targeted antibiotic therapy and/or modification of antimicrobial treatment based on T2Bacteria Panel findings. Given the high reliability, faster time to detection, and easy workflow, the technique qualifies as a point-of-care testing approach.

Impact of Sepsis Flow Chip, a novelty fast microbiology method, in the treatment of bacteremia caused by Gram-negative bacilli

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the information provided by the new Sepsis Chip Flow system (SFC) and other fast microbiological techniques on the selection of the appropriate antimicrobial treatment by the clinical researchers of an antimicrobial stewardship team.

Methods

Two experienced clinical researchers performed the theoretical exercise of independently selecting the treatment for patients diagnosed by bacteremia due to bacilli gram negative (BGN). At first, the clinicians had only available the clinical characteristics of 74 real patients. Sequentially, information regarding the Gram stain, MALDI-TOF, and SFC from Vitro were provided. Initially, the researchers prescribed an antimicrobial therapy based on the clinical data, later these data were complementing with information from microbiological techniques, and the clinicians made their decisions again.

Results

The data provided by the Gram stain reduced the number of patients prescribed with combined treatments (for clinician 1, from 23 to 7, and for clinician 2, from 28 to 12), but the use of carbapenems remained constant. In line with this, the data obtained by the MALDI-TOF also decreased the combined treatment, and the use of carbapenems remained unchanged. By contrast, the data on antimicrobial resistance provided by the SFC reduced the carbapenems treatment.

Conclusions

From the theoretical model the Gram stain and the MALDI-TOF results achieved a reduction in the combined treatment. However, the new system tested (SFC), due to the resistance mechanism data provided, not only reduced the combined treatment, it also decreased the prescription of the carbapenems.

Improving outcomes and antibiotic stewardship (IOAS) for patients with Gram-positive bloodstream infections through use of rapid testing: a quasi-experimental multicentre study of the Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC Kit

BACKGROUND

Data from the Improving Outcomes and Antibiotic Stewardship for Patients with Bloodstream Infections: Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC Kit (AXDX) Registry Study were analysed to determine the impact of rapid organism identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for Gram-positive bacteraemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicentre, quasi-experimental study evaluated clinical and antimicrobial stewardship metrics following the implementation of AXDX. Data from hospitalized patients with bacteraemia were compared between groups, one that underwent testing on AXDX (post-AXDX) and one that underwent traditional identification and AST (pre-AXDX). An analysis of patients with Gram-positive bacteraemia was performed. The primary outcome was time to optimal therapy (TTOT). Secondary outcomes included time to first antibiotic modification (overall and Gram-positive), duration of unnecessary MRSA coverage, incidence of adverse events, length of stay and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 219 (109 pre-AXDX, 110 post-AXDX) patients with Gram-positive bacteraemia were included. Median TTOT was 36.3 h (IQR, 16.9-56.7) in the pre-AXDX group and 20.4 h (IQR, 7.5-36.7) in the post-AXDX group (P = 0.01). Compared with pre-AXDX, median time to first antibiotic modification (29.1 versus 15.9 h; P = 0.002), time to first Gram-positive antibiotic modification (33.2 versus 17.2 h; P = 0.003) and median duration of unnecessary MRSA coverage (58.4 versus 29.7 h; P = 0.04) were reduced post-AXDX. A trend towards decreased acute kidney injury (24% versus 13%; P = 0.06) was observed in the post-AXDX group. Groups did not differ in other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of AXDX testing for patients with Gram-positive bacteraemia shortened the TTOT and reduced unnecessary antibiotic exposure due to faster antibiotic modifications.

Impact of Accelerate Pheno and BacT/Alert Virtuo on Clinical Processes and Outcomes in Patients with Sepsis and Concurrent Gram-Negative Bacteremia

The Accelerate Pheno and BacT/Alert Virtuo systems may improve bacteremia management. Here, we evaluated the impact of both devices on outcomes in patients with sepsis and concurrent Gram-negative bacteremia. This quasiexperimental study included a retrospective preimplementation and a prospective postimplementation group. Patients ≥18 years old with Gram-negative bacteremia were included. Patients with neutropenia, pregnant patients, those who were transferred from an outside hospital with active bloodstream infections, and those with polymicrobial bacteremia were excluded. Blood culture incubation in the BacT/Alert 3D device and microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing from culture plate growth were used prior to implementation of the BacT/Alert Virtuo and Accelerate Pheno systems. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) identification directly from blood culture was used pre- and postimplementation. Time to Gram stain results, identification, susceptibility reporting, initiation of narrow-spectrum Gram-negative therapy at 72 h, 30-day inpatient mortality, sepsis resolution, and length of hospital stay were evaluated. A total of 116 patients were included (63 preimplementation, 53 postimplementation). Median times to Gram stain and susceptibility results were significantly shorter postimplementation (P < 0.001). The postimplementation group had an improved hazard ratio for narrow-spectrum Gram-negative therapy at 72 h (hazard ratio [HR], 2.685 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.348 to 5.349]), a reduced hazard ratio for 30-day inpatient mortality (adjusted HR [aHR], 0.150 [95% CI, 0.026 to 0.846]), and improved sepsis resolution (92.5% versus 77.8% [P = 0.030]). The length of hospital stay was unchanged after implementation. We conclude that implementation of the BacT/Alert Virtuo and Accelerate Pheno systems improved microbiology laboratory processes, antibiotic utilization processes, and clinical outcomes. These data support the use of rapid diagnostics in sepsis with concurrent Gram-negative bacteremia.

Rapid detection of NDM and VIM carbapenemase encoding genes by recombinase polymerase amplification and lateral flow-based detection

Carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) pose a serious clinical threat and rapid detection tools are essential to aid in patient management. We developed rapid and simple molecular tests to detect bla_NDM-type and bla_VIM-type carbapenemase genes using recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) combined with a lateral flow detection. The tests could provide results in approximately 15 min when using DNA extracts, with limits of detection of 9.2 copies/μl for the bla_NDM-type assay and 7.5 copies/μl for bla_VIM-type assay, and successfully detected all isolates harbouring the carbapenemase encoding genes in a panel of 57 isolates. These RPA tests may be suitable for use in low-resource settings to tailor rapid implementation of infection control precautions and antibiotic stewardship.

Early prediction models for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli infection in emergency department: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis

BACKGROUND

Resistance in gram-negative bacteria has gained great importance in recent decades and one reason is the rapid increase of extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria as a growing problem worldwide. The increasing proportion of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) infections acquired in the emergency community is a new feature of ESBLs epidemiology. Early recognition of patients with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli infection is important in the emergency department. To mitigate the burden on the healthcare system, while also providing the best possible care for patients, early recognition of the infection is needed.

METHODS

For the acquisition of required data of eligible prospective/retrospective cohort study or randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we will search for publications from PubMed, Web of science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google scholar. Two independent reviewers will read the full English text of the articles, screened and selected carefully, removing duplication. Then we evaluate the quality and analyses data by Review Manager (V.5.4). Results data will be pooled and meta-analysis will be conducted if there's 2 eligible studies considered.

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate the value of the early prediction models for Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing E coli infection in emergency department.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis will provide clinical evidence for predicting Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing E coli infection in emergency department, inform our understanding of the value of the predictive model in predicting Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing E coli infection in emergency department in the early stage. The conclusions drawn from this study may be beneficial to patients, clinicians, and health-related policy makers.

STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202130049.

Day at the Races: Comparing BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture ID Panels to Verigene Blood Culture in Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections using DOOR-MAT Analysis

Three rapid diagnostic test panels (Verigene BC-GN, BioFire BCID, and BCID 2 [RUO]) were compared using the Desirability of Outcome Ranking Management of Antimicrobial Therapy (DOOR-MAT) to evaluate potential downstream antimicrobial prescribing decisions resulting from the panels’ different organism and resistance detection. BioFire BCID 2 (RUO) had the best mean DOOR-MAT scores.