t(3;8)(q26.2;q24) Often Leads to MECOM/MYC Rearrangement and Is Commonly Associated with Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasms and/or Disease Progression

Modelling and drug targeting of a myeloid neoplasm with atypical 3q26/MECOM rearrangement using patient-specific iPSCs

Structural variations involving enhancer hijacking induce aberrant oncogene expression and cause tumorigenesis. A rare translocation, t(3;8)(q26.2;q24), is associated with MECOM and MYC rearrangement, causing myeloid neoplasms with a dismal prognosis. The most recent World Health Organization classification recognises myeloid neoplasms with MECOM rearrangement as acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with defining genetic abnormalities. Recently, the increasing use of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology has helped elucidate the pathogenic processes of haematological malignancies. However, its utility for investigating enhancer hijacking in myeloid neoplasms remains unclear. In this study, we generated iPSC lines from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) harbouring t(3;8)(q26.2;q24) and differentiated them into haematopoietic progenitor cells to model the pathophysiology of MDS with t(3;8)(q26.2;q24). Our iPSC model reproduced the primary patient's MECOM expression changes and histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac) patterns in the MECOM promoter and MYC blood enhancer cluster (BENC). Furthermore, we revealed the apoptotic effects of the bromodomain and extra-terminal motif (BET) inhibitor on iPSC-derived MDS cells by suppressing activated MECOM. Our study demonstrates the usefulness of iPSC models for uncovering the precise mechanism of enhancer hijacking due to chromosomal structural changes and discovering potential therapeutic drug candidates for cancer treatment.

3q26.2/MECOM Rearrangements by Pericentric Inv(3): Diagnostic Challenges and Clinicopathologic Features

MECOM rearrangement (MECOM-R) resulting from 3q26.2 aberrations is often associated with myeloid neoplasms and inferior prognosis in affected patients. Uncommonly, certain 3q26.2/MECOM-R can be subtle/cryptic and consequently overlooked by karyotyping. We identified 17 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (male/female: 13/4 with a median age of 67 years, range 42 to 85 years) with a pericentric inv(3) leading to MECOM-R, with breakpoints at 3p23 (n = 11), 3p25 (n = 3), 3p21 (n = 2) and 3p13 (n = 1) on 3p and 3q26.2 on 3q. These pericentric inv(3)s were overlooked by karyotyping initially in 16 of 17 cases and later detected by metaphase FISH analysis. Similar to the patients with classic/paracentric inv(3)(q21q26.2), patients with pericentric inv(3) exhibited frequent cytopenia, morphological dysplasia (especially megakaryocytes), -7/del(7q), frequent NRAS (n = 6), RUNX1 (n = 5) and FLT-3 (n = 4) mutations and dismal outcomes (median overall survival: 14 months). However, patients with pericentric inv(3) more frequently had AML with thrombocytopenia (n = 15, 88%), relative monocytosis in peripheral blood (n = 15, 88%), decreased megakaryocytes (n = 11, 65%), and lower SF3B1 mutation. We conclude that AML with pericentric inv(3) shares some similarities with AML associated with classic/paracentric inv(3)/GATA2::MECOM but also shows certain unique features. Pericentric inv(3)s are often subtle/cryptic by chromosomal analysis. A reflex FISH analysis for MECOM-R is recommended in myeloid neoplasms showing -7/del(7q).

Flow cytometry immunophenotypic features of pure erythroid leukemia and the distinction from reactive erythroid precursors

BACKGROUND

The immunophenotype of pure erythroid leukemia (PEL) as determined by flow cytometry immunophenotypic analysis is not well characterized. The immunophenotypic difference between PEL and reactive conditions is under-explored.

METHODS

We assessed and compared the immunophenotype of 24 PEL cases and 28 reactive cases containing early erythroid precursors by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The neoplastic erythroid cells in all PEL cases were positive for CD36 and CD71. CD45 was also positive in all cases, but the expression level was often dimmer than granulocytes. CD117 expression ranged from partial to uniform, and CD235a was often only positive in the CD117-dim to negative cells, corresponding to more differentiated subset. PEL cases frequently (87%) showed decreased or negative CD38 expression, contrasting to reactive early erythroid precursors that showed bright CD38 (p < 0.0001). CD7 (25%) and CD13 (29%) aberrant expressions were only observed in PEL but not in the reactive erythroid cells. Normal early erythroid precursors in all reactive bone marrows showed partial expression of CD4; In contrast, aberrant CD4 expression was detected in 71% PEL cases, either uniformly positive (50%) or completely negative (21%). While normal/reactive bone marrows almost always contained a small subset of CD34-positive early erythroid precursors, the neoplastic pronormoblasts in all PEL cases were CD34 negative. Although not increased in number, CD34-positive myeloblasts were frequently detected in PEL and demonstrated an aberrant immunophenotype in 90% PEL cases.

CONCLUSIONS

PEL shows a distinctive immunophenotype which can be distinguished from reactive erythroid precursors by flow cytometry immunophenotyping.

Comparison of myeloid neoplasms with nonclassic 3q26.2/MECOM versus classic inv(3)/t(3;3) rearrangements reveals diverse clinicopathologic features, genetic profiles, and molecular mechanisms of MECOM activation

MECOM rearrangements are recurrent in myeloid neoplasms and associated with poor prognosis. However, only inv(3)(q21q26.2) and t(3;3)(q21;q26.2), the classic MECOM rearrangements resulting in RPN1-MECOM rearrangement with Mecom overexpression and GATA2 haploinsufficiency, define the distinct subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and serve as presumptive evidence for myelodysplastic syndrome based on the current World Health Organization classification. Myeloid neoplasms with nonclassic 3q26.2/MECOM rearrangements have been found to be clinically aggressive, but comparative analysis of clinicopathologic and genomic features is limited. We retrospectively studied cohorts of myeloid neoplasms with classic and nonclassic MECOM rearrangements. Cases with classic rearrangements consisted predominantly of AML, often with inv(3) or t(3;3) as the sole chromosome abnormality, whereas the group of nonclassic rearrangements included a variety of myeloid neoplasms, often with complex karyotype without TP53 mutations and similarly dismal overall survival. Immunohistochemistry revealed Mecom protein overexpression in both groups, but overexpression in cases with nonclassic rearrangements was mediated through a mechanism other than GATA2 distal enhancer involvement typical for classic rearrangement. Our results demonstrated that myeloid neoplasms with nonclassic 3q26.2/MECOM rearrangements encompass a diverse group of diseases with poor clinical outcome, overexpression of Mecom protein as a result of the nonclassic mechanism of MECOM activation.

Value and pitfalls of assessing bone marrow morphologic findings to predict response in patients with myelofibrosis who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a curative option for patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Bone marrow (BM) morphologic evaluation of myelofibrosis following allo-HSCT is known to be challenging in this context because resolution of morphologic changes is a gradual process.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We compared BM samples of patients with myelofibrosis who underwent first allo-HSCT and achieved molecular remission by day 100 with BM samples of patients who continued to have persistent molecular evidence of disease following allo-HSCT.

RESULTS

The study group included 29 patients: 17 primary MF, 7 post-polycythemia vera (PV) MF, and 5 post-essential thrombocythemia (ET) MF. In this cohort there were 18 JAK2 p.V617F, 8 CALR; 1 MPL, and 2 patients had concurrent JAK2 p.V617F and MPL mutations. The control group included 5 patients with primary MF, one with post-PV MF, one with post-ET MF (5 JAK2 p.V617F; 2 CALR). Following allo-HSCT, both groups showed reduction in BM cellularity and number of megakaryocytes. The study cohort also less commonly had dense megakaryocyte clusters and endosteal located megakaryocytes and showed less fibrosis. There was no statistical difference in BM cellularity, presence of erythroid islands, degree of osteosclerosis, or megakaryocyte number, size, nuclear lobation, presence of clusters or intrasinusoidal location.

CONCLUSIONS

Following allo-HSCT at 100 days, morphologic evaluation of BM in patients with MF cannot reliably predict persistence versus clearance of molecular evidence of MF. Disappearance of BM MF, dense megakaryocyte clusters, and endosteal localization of megakaryocytes are suggestive of disease response.

Wouters B, Bindels E, Smeenk L, Delwel R. The leukemic oncogene EVI1 hijacks a MYC super-enhancer by CTCF-facilitated loops

Chromosomal rearrangements are a frequent cause of oncogene deregulation in human malignancies. Overexpression of EVI1 is found in a subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 3q26 chromosomal rearrangements, which is often therapy resistant. In AMLs harboring a t(3;8)(q26;q24), we observed the translocation of a MYC super-enhancer (MYC SE) to the EVI1 locus. We generated an in vitro model mimicking a patient-based t(3;8)(q26;q24) using CRISPR-Cas9 technology and demonstrated hyperactivation of EVI1 by the hijacked MYC SE. This MYC SE contains multiple enhancer modules, of which only one recruits transcription factors active in early hematopoiesis. This enhancer module is critical for EVI1 overexpression as well as enhancer-promoter interaction. Multiple CTCF binding regions in the MYC SE facilitate this enhancer-promoter interaction, which also involves a CTCF binding site upstream of the EVI1 promoter. We hypothesize that this CTCF site acts as an enhancer-docking site in t(3;8) AML. Genomic analyses of other 3q26-rearranged AML patient cells point to a common mechanism by which EVI1 uses this docking site to hijack enhancers active in early hematopoiesis.

MYC: a multipurpose oncogene with prognostic and therapeutic implications in blood malignancies

MYC oncogene is a transcription factor with a wide array of functions affecting cellular activities such as cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA damage response, and hematopoiesis. Due to the multi-functionality of MYC, its expression is regulated at multiple levels. Deregulation of this oncogene can give rise to a variety of cancers. In this review, MYC regulation and the mechanisms by which MYC adjusts cellular functions and its implication in hematologic malignancies are summarized. Further, we also discuss potential inhibitors of MYC that could be beneficial for treating hematologic malignancies.

Clinicopathologic Features of Myelodysplastic Syndromes Involving Lymph Nodes

Lymph nodes (LNs) involved by a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are rare and uncommonly biopsied. In this study, we report 6 MDS patients who underwent an LN biopsy that showed MDS, and we summarize the clinicopathologic features of this cohort. All patients presented with lymphadenopathy (generalized in 5), 5 patients had splenomegaly, and 3 patients had hepatomegaly. Histologically, the LN architecture was distorted without complete effacement. MDS cells, mostly of the myeloid lineage, produced interfollicular expansion. These myeloid cells exhibited a spectrum of maturation, and immature and atypical forms were common, including eosinophils. Scattered megakaryocytes and nucleated erythroid cells were often present. Concurrent bone marrow aspirate and biopsy specimens in these patients showed persistent/resistant MDS. Following the diagnosis of LN involvement, patients did not respond well to therapy and all died by the time of the last follow-up, with a median survival of 6.7 months (range, 4.5 to 21.6 mo). In summary, patients with MDS uncommonly develop clinically evident lymphadenopathy prompting biopsy as a result of infiltration by MDS. MDS in LNs can be subtle, showing incomplete and sometimes mild distortion of the architecture, and ancillary studies including immunohistochemical and flow cytometric immunophenotypic analysis are often needed to establish the diagnosis. These data also suggest that the emergence of lymphadenopathy attributable to MDS is associated with poor treatment response and prognosis in MDS patients and that aggressive therapy or alternative treatment regimens need to be explored in this context.

DNA methylation profiling to predict recurrence risk in stage Ι lung adenocarcinoma: Development and validation of a nomogram to clinical management

Increasing evidence suggested DNA methylation may serve as potential prognostic biomarkers; however, few related DNA methylation signatures have been established for prediction of lung cancer prognosis. We aimed at developing DNA methylation signature to improve prognosis prediction of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). A total of 268 stage I LUAD patients from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were included. These patients were separated into training and internal validation datasets. GSE39279 was used as an external validation set. A 13‐DNA methylation signature was identified to be crucially relevant to the relapse‐free survival (RFS) of patients with stage I LUAD by the univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis in the training dataset. The Kaplan‐Meier analysis indicated that the 13‐DNA methylation signature could significantly distinguish the high‐ and low‐risk patients in entire TCGA dataset, internal validation and external validation datasets. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis further verified that the 13‐DNA methylation signature had a better value to predict the RFS of stage I LUAD patients in internal validation, external validation and entire TCGA datasets. In addition, a nomogram combining methylomic risk scores with other clinicopathological factors was performed and the result suggested the good predictive value of the nomogram. In conclusion, we successfully built a DNA methylation‐associated nomogram, enabling prediction of the RFS of patients with stage I LUAD.

MECOM rearrangement involving the MYC locus: Two additional patients with the rare translocation, t(3;8)(q26.2;q24), and molecular review

A relatively small subset of myeloid neoplasms involve rearrangements of cytoband 3q26.2. Such rearrangements are often in response to therapy and carry a poor prognosis. The ectopic expression of MECOM is the result of such translocations. To date, thirty-three t(3;8)(q26.2;q24) cases have been reported; we contribute two patients with confirmed MECOM and MYC rearrangements. Both patients presented with pancytopenia and were diagnosed with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative disorders. In addition to translocation t(3;8), Patient 1 possessed a derivative chromosome 5, while Patient 2 possessed monosomy 7; neither patient's clonal abnormalities resolved in follow-up studies. Of the previous 33 cases, one exhibited 5q loss, while monosomy 7 was found in fifteen. These findings contribute to the small number of reported cases with t(3;8) translocations. We also speculate about the molecular mechanisms associated with this translocation.

Cytogenetics of Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm: Chromosomal Rearrangements and DNA Copy-Number Alterations

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a skin-tropic hematopoietic malignancy. Approximately 60% of cases with analyzable karyotyping results show complex karyotypes. Losses are more frequently found than copy-number gains. Recurrently deleted regions include tumor suppressor genes. No specific chromosomal abnormalities have been demonstrated in BPDCN, but genomic rearrangements involving the MYB family genes and MYC were identified. One-third of cases of BPDCN harbor the 8q24 rearrangement, most frequently with 6p21 harboring RUNX2, which is associated with immunoblastoid cytomorphology and MYC expression. MYB rearrangement is detected in 20% of patients with BPDCN. We review copy-number alterations and chromosomal rearrangements.

t(11;16)(q23;p13)/KMT2A-CREBBP in hematologic malignancies: presumptive evidence of myelodysplasia or therapy-related neoplasm?

Fusion partners of KMT2A affect disease phenotype and influence the current World Health Organization classification of hematologic neoplasms. The t(11;16)(q23;p13)/KMT2A-CREBBP is considered presumptive evidence of a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and a MDS-related cytogenetic abnormality in the classification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here, we report 18 cases of hematologic neoplasms with t(11;16). There were 8 males and 10 females with a median age of 51.9 years at time of detection of t(11;16). Of 17 patients with enough clinical information and pathological materials for review, 16 had a history of cytotoxic therapies for various malignancies including 12/15 patients who received topoisomerase II inhibitors, and 15 were classified as having therapy-related neoplasms. The median interval from the diagnosis of primary malignancy to the detection of t(11;16) was 23.2 months. Dysplasia, usually mild, was observed in 7/17 patients. Blasts demonstrated monocytic differentiation in 8/8 patients who developed AML at the time or following detection of t(11;16). t(11;16) was observed as the sole chromosomal abnormality in 10/18 patients. KMT2A rearrangement was confirmed in 11/11 patients. The median survival from the detection of t(11;16) was 15.4 months. In summary, t(11;16)(q23;p13) is rare and overwhelmingly associated with prior exposure of cytotoxic therapy. Instead of being considered presumptive evidence of myelodysplasia, we suggest that the detection of t(11;16) should automatically prompt a search for a history of malignancy and cytotoxic therapy so that proper risk stratification and clinical management are made accordingly. The dismal outcome of patients with t(11;16) is in keeping with that of therapy-related neoplasms.

Lenalidomide Plus Hypomethylating Agent as a Treatment Option in Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Recurrent Genetic Abnormalities-AML With inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2); GATA2, MECOM

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous clonal hematopoietic neoplasm. The cytogenetic changes associated with AML affect the response rate and survival and are one of the most important independent prognostic factors. AML with inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2); GATA2, MECOM accounts for 1% to 2% of all forms of AML and has been associated with a younger age at diagnosis, a poor response to standard induction chemotherapy, and very poor long-term prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study comparing the outcomes with hypomethylating agent (HMA) plus lenalidomide to those with standard intensive induction therapies for newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory AML with inv(3).

RESULTS

Of the 15 patients, 4 (26.7%) had received lenalidomide and HMA as primary therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) was 100% for the 4 patients who had received lenalidomide with HMA as first-line induction therapy. The ORR was 27.3% (3 of 11) for the patients who had received other induction regimens (P = .0256). The duration of response for first induction therapy was an average of 7.4 months after lenalidomide plus an HMA and a mean of 1.5 months after induction with other chemotherapy regimen (P = .057). The ORR for induction and reinduction therapy was also assessed, with an ORR of 21.4% (6 of 28) for alternative chemotherapy regimens and an ORR of 75% (6 of 8) for induction and reinduction with lenalidomide plus HMA (P = .0046).

CONCLUSIONS

The high ORR and reasonable duration of response could allow for potentially curative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for these patients with high-risk AML. Our initial data suggest that lenalidomide plus HMA is a promising approach for patients with AML with inv(3).

Data on MECOM rearrangement-driven chromosomal aberrations in myeloid malignancies

Data in this article presents the results of conventional cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses in 129 patients with confirmed MECOM rearrangement (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2019.03.002) [1]. Generally, the MECOM rearrangement has arisen through translocation, inversion, and insertion and/or unknown mechanism. In addition to the typical chromosomal aberrations, inv(3)(q21q26.2) and t(3; 3)(q21; q26.6) [2–4], over 50% of cases presented here exhibit a wide spectrum of MECOM rearrangement-driven, atypical chromosomal aberrations, including inv(3) with breakpoint other than 3q21; t(1; 3); t(2; 3); t(3; 6); t(3; 8); t(3; 12); t(3; 17); t(3; 21) as well as an insertion of 3q26.2 into different chromosomes. These cases are thoroughly characterized by karyotyping, interphase-, metaphase-, map-back FISH and whole chromosomal painting (WCP) analyses.