Following Suit: Using Conversation Cards for Priority Setting in Pediatric Weight Management

Quality of life, burden of treatment, safety, and avoidance of future events (QBSAfe) protocol: a pilot study testing an intervention to shift the paradigm of diabetes care

Background

Diabetes care has been traditionally focused on targeting certain levels of glycemic control. This narrow emphasis may impose burdens on patients, including high treatment costs, illness-related work, or side effects from medications, while leaving other patient needs and goals under-addressed. The authors aim to shift the paradigm of care for people with diabetes, to focus on quality of life, burden of treatment, safety, and avoidance of future events: the QBSAfe domains.

Methods

We describe a single-arm pilot study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of using the QBSAfe agenda setting kit (ASK) during routine clinical visits. The set of 14 conversation aid cards was co-developed with patients, family caregivers, and clinicians. The ASK will be used in the context of a clinic visit, which will be recorded by members of the study team to identify patterns of clinician-patient conversations. Feasibility will be measured by the number of participants recruited, time to goal accrual, and completeness of data collection; acceptability will be assessed using post-visit surveys of patients and clinicians. A subgroup of patients will be invited to participate in post-visit qualitative semi-structured interviews for additional feedback. This study will be conducted across three medical centers in the Midwest and East Coast of the USA.

Discussion

Current healthcare infrastructure and associated demands and pressures on clinicians make changes in care difficult. However, this intervention has the potential to shift conversations during clinical encounters so they can address and directly respond to patient needs, symptoms, and capacity. As part of the QBSAfe ASK, the authors are also actively collaborating with a variety of stakeholders to create tools to help clinicians respond more effectively to patient concerns as they are raised during the clinical encounters. Additional insights about the use of the QBSAfe approach in the virtual space will be gathered during the process of our study due to restrictions imposed upon face to face visit during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04514523. Registered 17 August 2020—retrospectively registered.

Public health nurse referrals for paediatric weight management: A nested mixed-methods study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To (a) characterise and determine proportions of referred and enrolled children and (b) explore public health nurses' (PHNs) experiences, perspectives and recommendations regarding a new nurse-led referral pathway for paediatric weight management.

BACKGROUND

Children with obesity and their families in Canada access specialised services for obesity management through physician referral. Since this requirement can prevent timely access to health services, we established and tested a referral pathway whereby PHNs directly refer children to specialised care for obesity management.

DESIGN

Nested mixed-methods study reported using GRAMMS.

METHOD

Our research study included children (2-17 years of age; body mass index ≥85th percentile) referred by a PHN to the Pediatric Centre for Weight and Health (PCWH; Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) from April 2017-September 2018. We summarised referral and enrolment data using descriptive statistics and conducted one-on-one, semi-structured telephone interviews with PHNs; interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, managed using NVivo 12 and analysed by two independent reviewers using content analysis.

RESULTS

Our sample included 79 referred children (4.4 ± 1.8 years old; 3.4 ± 1.3 BMI z-score; 52.7% male), of which 47 (59.5%) enrolled in care. PHNs' (n = 11) experiences, perspectives and recommendations regarding the new referral pathway were grouped into four categories: (a) practicality of the referral pathway (e.g., simple and straightforward), (b) utility of the referral pathway (e.g., economic and timesaving), (c) uptake of the referral pathway (e.g., physician's influence) and (d) recommendations to improve the referral pathway (e.g., having electronic access to the referral form).

CONCLUSIONS

A PHN-specific referral pathway led most children and families to enrol in paediatric weight management and overall was perceived as acceptable and appropriate among PHNs.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Our results highlight the valuable role that PHNs can play in directly referring children to specialised services for weight management. This pathway has the potential to reduce wait times and enhance treatment enrolment.