Evaluation of metaquant microdialysis for measurement of absolute concentrations of amphetamine and dopamine in brain: A viable method for assessing pharmacokinetic profile of drugs in the brain

The Alkylamine Stimulant 1,3-Dimethylamylamine Exhibits Substrate-Like Regulation of Dopamine Transporter Function and Localization

The alkylamine stimulant 1,3-dimethylamylamine (DMAA) is used nonmedically as an appetite suppressant and exercise performance enhancer despite adverse cardiovascular effects that have limited its legal status. There is scant research describing the mechanism of action of DMAA, making it difficult to gauge risks or therapeutic potential. An important molecular target of structurally related phenethylamines, such as amphetamine, for regulating mood, cognition, movement, and the development of substance use disorder is the dopamine transporter, which limits the range and magnitude of dopamine signaling via reuptake from the extracellular space. The present studies were therefore initiated to characterize the effects of DMAA on dopamine transporter function. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that DMAA exhibits substrate-like effects on dopamine transporter function and trafficking. In transport assays in human embryonic kidney cells, DMAA inhibited dopamine uptake by the human dopamine transporter in a competitive manner. Docking analysis and molecular dynamics simulations supported these findings, revealing that DMAA binds to the S1 substrate binding site and induces a conformational change from outward-facing open to outward-facing closed states, similar to the known substrates. Further supporting substrate-like effects of DMAA, the drug stimulated dopamine transporter endocytosis in a heterologous expression system via cocaine- and protein kinase A-sensitive mechanisms, mirroring findings with amphetamine. Together, these data indicate that DMAA elicits neurologic effects by binding to and regulating function of the dopamine transporter. Furthermore, pharmacologic distinctions from amphetamine reveal structural determinants for regulating transporter conformation and add mechanistic insight for the regulation of dopamine transporter endocytosis. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The alkylamine stimulant 1,3-dimethylamylamine (DMAA) is used as an appetite suppressant and athletic performance enhancer and is structurally similar to amphetamine, but there is scant research describing its mechanism of action. Characterizing the effects of DMAA on dopamine transporter function supports evaluation of potential risks and therapeutic potential while also revealing mechanistic details of dynamic transporter-substrate interactions.

Development of a non-human primate model to support CNS translational research: Demonstration with D-amphetamine exposure and dopamine response

BACKGROUND

Challenges specific to the discovery and development of candidate CNS drugs have led to implementation of various in silico, in vitro and in vivo approaches to improve the odds for commercialization of novel treatments.

NEW METHOD

Advances in analytical methodology and microdialysis probe design have enabled development of a non-human primate model capable of measuring concentrations of drugs or endogenous chemicals in brain extracellular fluid (ECF) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Linking these to population modeling reduces animal numbers to support predictive translational sciences in primates. Application to measure D-amphetamine exposure and dopamine response in ECF and CSF demonstrate the approach.

RESULTS

Following a 0.1 mg/kg intravenous bolus dose of D-amphetamine, a population approach was used to build a plasma compartmental-based and brain physiologic-based pharmacokinetic (PK) model linking drug concentrations in plasma to brain ECF and CSF concentrations. Dopamine was also measured in brain ECF. The PK model was used to simulate the relationship between D-amphetamine exposure and dopamine response in ECF over a wide dose range.

COMPARISONS WITH EXISTING METHODS

Ability to co-sample and measure drug and endogenous substances in blood, brain ECF and/or CSF, coupled with population modeling, provides an in vivo approach to evaluate CNS drug penetration and effect in non-human primates.

CONCLUSIONS

A method to measure drug and endogenous neurochemicals in non-human primate brain fluids is demonstrated. Its basis in non-human primates merits improved confidence regarding predictions of drug exposure and target engagement in human CNS.

Development of a Semimechanistic Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model Describing Dextroamphetamine Exposure and Striatal Dopamine Response in Rats and Nonhuman Primates following a Single Dose of Dextroamphetamine

Acute central nervous system exposure to dextroamphetamine (d-amphetamine) elicits a multitude of effects, including dual action on the dopamine transporter (DAT) to increase extracellular dopamine, and induction of a negative feedback response to limit the dopamine increase. A semimechanistic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model with consideration of these multiple effects as a basis was developed. Integrated pharmacokinetics of d-amphetamine in plasma, brain extracellular fluid (ECF) via microdialysis, and cerebrospinal fluid were characterized using a population approach. This PK model was then linked to an indirect-response pharmacodynamic model using as a basis the measurement of extracellular striatal dopamine, also via microdialysis. In both rats and nonhuman primates (NHPs), d-amphetamine stimulation of dopamine outflow (reverse transport) through DAT was primarily responsible for the dose-linear increase in dopamine. As well, in both species a moderator function was needed to account for loss of the dopamine response in the presence of a relatively sustained d-amphetamine ECF exposure, presumptive of an acute tolerance response. PK/PD model structure was consistent between species; however, there was a 10-fold faster return to baseline dopamine in NHPs in response to an acute d-amphetamine challenge. These results suggest preservation from rodents to NHPs regarding the mechanism by which amphetamine increases extracellular dopamine, but a faster system response in NHPs to tolerate this increase. This microdialysis-based PK/PD model suggests greater value in directing preclinical discovery of novel approaches that modify reverse transport stimulation to treat amphetamine abuse. General value regarding insertion of an NHP model in paradigm rodent-to-human translational research is also suggested.

Enhancement of a visual reinforcer by D-amphetamine and nicotine in adult rats: relation to habituation and food restriction

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Nicotine and D-amphetamine can strengthen reinforcing effects of unconditioned visual stimuli. We investigated whether these reinforcement-enhancing effects reflect a slowing of stimulus habituation and depend on food restriction.

METHODS

Adult male rats pressed an active lever to illuminate a cue light during daily 60-min sessions. Depending on the experiment, rats were challenged with fixed or varying doses of D-amphetamine (0.25-2 mg/kg IP) and nicotine (0.025-0.2 mg/kg SC) or with the tobacco constituent norharman (0.03-10 μg/kg IV). Experiment 1 tested for possible reinforcement-enhancing effects of D-amphetamine and norharman. Experiment 2 investigated whether nicotine and amphetamine inhibited the spontaneous within-session decline in lever pressing. Experiment 3 assessed the effects of food restriction.

RESULTS

Amphetamine (0.25-1 mg/kg) and nicotine (0.1 mg/kg) increased active lever pressing specifically (two- to threefold increase). The highest doses of nicotine and amphetamine also affected inactive lever responding (increase and decrease, respectively). With the visual reinforcer omitted, responding was largely extinguished. Neither drug appeared to slow habituation, as assessed by the within-session decline in lever pressing, and reinforcement-enhancing effects still occurred if the drugs were given after this decline had occurred. Food restriction enhanced the reinforcement-enhancing effect of amphetamine but not that of nicotine.

CONCLUSIONS

Responding remained goal-directed after several weeks of testing. Low doses of D-amphetamine and nicotine produced reinforcement enhancement even in free-feeding subjects, independent of the spontaneous within-session decline in responding. Reinforcement enhancement by amphetamine, but not nicotine, was enhanced by concurrent subchronic food restriction.

Differing properties of putative fast-spiking interneurons in the striatum of two rat strains

Local circuits within the striatum of the basal ganglia include a small number of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic fast-spiking interneurons (FSI). The number of these cells is reduced in disorders of behavioral control, but it is unknown whether this is accompanied by altered electrophysiological properties. The genetically hypertensive (GH) rat strain exhibits impulsiveness and hyperactivity. We investigated if resting-state FSI activity is affected in this strain using extracellular recordings. We also examined the effect of systemic amphetamine (AMPH), a stimulant drug used in the treatment of these particular behavioral deficits. Putative FSI (pFSI) were encountered less often in GH rats compared to the Wistar control strain. pFSI in GH rats also exhibited a higher mean firing rate, higher intraburst firing rate, lower interburst interval, and shorter bursts compared to controls. AMPH increased the mean overall firing rate of Wistar rat pFSI but did not significantly alter the firing properties of this subtype in GH rats. These differences in the resting-state electrophysiological activity of pFSI in GH rats point to them as a cell type of particular interest in understanding striatal functioning across different strains.

Brain concentrations of mGluR5 negative allosteric modulator MTEP in relation to receptor occupancy--Comparison to MPEP

BACKGROUND

To verify relation between brain free levels, receptor occupancy in vivo and in vitro affinity at the target for mGluR5 negative allosteric modulator (NAM) MTEP.

METHODS

We evaluated plasma and brain extra-cellular fluid (ECF) concentration of MTEP at behaviourally active dose (5mg/kg) using in vivo microdialysis. These values were compared it to the affinity in vitro (receptor binding and FLIPR) and to receptor occupancy in vivo. Another, related substance, MPEP was used for comparison.

RESULTS

MTEP and MPEP respectively inhibited mGluR5 receptors function in vitro with an affinity of 25.4 and 12.3 nM respectively. Accordingly peak ECF (extracellular fluid) levels were 1.3 and 0.14 μM, and peak total plasma levels were 7-11 and 2.6 μM. The ED50 for in vivo receptor occupancy was for both agents in the range of 0.8-0.7 mg/kg.

CONCLUSIONS

At behaviourally active dose MTEP produced complete mGluR5 receptor occupancy but over 50 times higher ECF concentrations than affinity for mGluR5 receptor in vitro. This difference is seems lower for other mGluR5 NAM compounds such as MPEP. A possibly explanation could be different distribution in body compartments of both agents leading to errors of estimation with the microdialysis technique or different pharmacological activity at the receptor.

A review of microdialysis coupled to microchip electrophoresis for monitoring biological events

Microdialysis is a powerful sampling technique that enables monitoring of dynamic processes in vitro and in vivo. The combination of microdialysis with chromatographic or electrophoretic methods with selective detection yields a "separation-based sensor" capable of monitoring multiple analytes in near real time. For monitoring biological events, analysis of microdialysis samples often requires techniques that are fast (<1 min), have low volume requirements (nL-pL), and, ideally, can be employed on-line. Microchip electrophoresis fulfills these requirements and also permits the possibility of integrating sample preparation and manipulation with detection strategies directly on-chip. Microdialysis coupled to microchip electrophoresis has been employed for monitoring biological events in vivo and in vitro. This review discusses technical considerations for coupling microdialysis sampling and microchip electrophoresis, including various interface designs, and current applications in the field.

Imaging endogenous opioid peptide release with [11C]carfentanil and [3H]diprenorphine: influence of agonist-induced internalization

Understanding the cellular processes underpinning the changes in binding observed during positron emission tomography neurotransmitter release studies may aid translation of these methodologies to other neurotransmitter systems. We compared the sensitivities of opioid receptor radioligands, carfentanil, and diprenorphine, to amphetamine-induced endogenous opioid peptide (EOP) release and methadone administration in the rat. We also investigated whether agonist-induced internalization was involved in reductions in observed binding using subcellular fractionation and confocal microscopy. After radioligand administration, significant reductions in [(11)C]carfentanil, but not [(3)H]diprenorphine, uptake were observed after methadone and amphetamine pretreatment. Subcellular fractionation and in vitro radioligand binding studies showed that amphetamine pretreatment only decreased total [(11)C]carfentanil binding. In vitro saturation binding studies conducted in buffers representative of the internalization pathway suggested that μ-receptors are significantly less able to bind the radioligands in endosomal compared with extracellular compartments. Finally, a significant increase in μ-receptor-early endosome co-localization in the hypothalamus was observed after amphetamine and methadone treatment using double-labeling confocal microscopy, with no changes in δ- or κ-receptor co-localization. These data indicate carfentanil may be superior to diprenorphine when imaging EOP release in vivo, and that alterations in the ability to bind internalized receptors may be a predictor of ligand sensitivity to endogenous neurotransmitter release.

Effects of amphetamine on subcellular distribution of dopamine and DOPAC

Amphetamine effects on distribution of dopamine, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), and amphetamine in vesicular, cytosolic, and extracellular compartments associated with a striatal varicosity were estimated through use of a computer simulation model. In addition, contribution to overall effects of amphetamine by each of five actions--transport by dopamine transporter (DAT), transport by vesicular monoamine transporter, stimulation of reverse transport, inhibition of monoamine oxidase (MAO), and slowing of dopamine cell firing rate--were evaluated. Amphetamine enters a varicosity almost entirely by DAT and accumulates to very high levels within the varicosity. Both reverse transport by DAT and passive diffusion contribute to continual amphetamine egress across the plasma membrane. Amphetamine enters storage vesicles by both transport and diffusion. The transport portion competes with dopamine storage, resulting in redistribution of approximately half of dopamine from vesicles to cytosol. The high concentration of amphetamine in the cytosol inhibits MAO, protecting cytosolic dopamine. A very small fraction of cytosolic dopamine is moved to extracellular compartment via reverse transport by DAT. The amount of dopamine moved by reverse transport is limited because of competition by very high cytosolic levels of amphetamine. In the presence of amphetamine, rate of dopamine transfer to extracellular compartment is less than control; however, high levels of extracellular dopamine are maintained because amphetamine occupies the DAT, thus limiting dopamine reuptake. Simulation output from a model using exchange-diffusion mechanism of reverse transport does not match all published data that were simulated, suggesting that inward transport of a substrate is not required to initiate reverse transport.