1
|
Buccilli B. Exploring new horizons: Emerging therapeutic strategies for pediatric stroke. Exp Neurol 2024; 374:114701. [PMID: 38278205 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2024.114701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
Pediatric stroke presents unique challenges, and optimizing treatment strategies is essential for improving outcomes in this vulnerable population. This review aims to provide an overview of new, innovative, and potential treatments for pediatric stroke, with a primary objective to stimulate further research in this field. Our review highlights several promising approaches in the realm of pediatric stroke management, including but not limited to stem cell therapy and robotic rehabilitation. These innovative interventions offer new avenues for enhancing functional recovery, reducing long-term disability, and tailoring treatments to individual patient needs. The findings of this review underscore the importance of ongoing research and development of innovative treatments in pediatric stroke. These advancements hold significant clinical relevance, offering the potential to improve the lives of children affected by stroke by enhancing the precision, efficacy, and accessibility of therapeutic interventions. Embracing these innovations is essential in our pursuit of better outcomes and a brighter future for pediatric stroke care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Buccilli
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Neurosurgery, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Y, Vora I, Huynh BP, Picard-Fraser M, Daneshzand M, Nummenmaa A, Kimberley TJ. Coils are not created equal: Effects on TMS thresholding. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:1-3. [PMID: 38056826 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yuchao Wang
- Department of Rehabilitation Science, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Isha Vora
- Department of Rehabilitation Science, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Baothy P Huynh
- Department of Rehabilitation Science, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew Picard-Fraser
- Department of Rehabilitation Science, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mohammad Daneshzand
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Aapo Nummenmaa
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Teresa J Kimberley
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Y, Jiang Y, Zhang Z, Li Z, Zhu C. Transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping of the motor cortex: comparison of five estimation algorithms. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1301075. [PMID: 38130697 PMCID: PMC10733534 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1301075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There are currently five different kinds of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor mapping algorithms available, from ordinary point-based algorithms to advanced field-based algorithms. However, there have been only a limited number of comparison studies conducted, and they have not yet examined all of the currently available algorithms. This deficiency impedes the judicious selection of algorithms for application in both clinical and basic neuroscience, and hinders the potential promotion of a potential superior algorithm. Considering the influence of algorithm complexity, further investigation is needed to examine the differences between fMRI peaks and TMS cortical hotspots that were identified previously. Methods Twelve healthy participants underwent TMS motor mapping and a finger-tapping task during fMRI. The motor cortex TMS mapping results were estimated by five algorithms, and fMRI activation results were obtained. For each algorithm, the prediction error was defined as the distance between the measured scalp hotspot and optimized coil position, which was determined by the maximum electric field strength in the estimated motor cortex. Additionally, the study identified the minimum number of stimuli required for stable mapping. Finally, the location difference between the TMS mapping cortical hotspot and the fMRI activation peak was analyzed. Results The projection yielded the lowest prediction error (5.27 ± 4.24 mm) among the point-based algorithms and the association algorithm yielded the lowest (6.66 ± 3.48 mm) among field-based estimation algorithms. The projection algorithm required fewer stimuli, possibly resulting from its suitability for the grid-based mapping data collection method. The TMS cortical hotspots from all algorithms consistently deviated from the fMRI activation peak (20.52 ± 8.46 mm for five algorithms). Conclusion The association algorithm might be a superior choice for clinical applications and basic neuroscience research, due to its lower prediction error and higher estimation sensitivity in the deep cortical structure, especially for the sulcus. It also has potential applicability in various other TMS domains, including language area mapping and more. Otherwise, our results provide further evidence that TMS motor mapping intrinsically differs from fMRI motor mapping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanyuan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Yihan Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
- Center for the Cognitive Science of Language, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing, China
| | - Zong Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng Li
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
- Center for Cognition and Neuroergonomics, State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University Zhuhai, Zhuhai, China
| | - Chaozhe Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
- Center for Collaboration and Innovation in Brain and Learning Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim HC, Lee W, Weisholtz DS, Yoo SS. Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation of cortical and thalamic somatosensory areas in human. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0288654. [PMID: 37478086 PMCID: PMC10361523 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The effects of transcranial focused ultrasound (FUS) stimulation of the primary somatosensory cortex and its thalamic projection (i.e., ventral posterolateral nucleus) on the generation of electroencephalographic (EEG) responses were evaluated in healthy human volunteers. Stimulation of the unilateral somatosensory circuits corresponding to the non-dominant hand generated EEG evoked potentials across all participants; however, not all perceived stimulation-mediated tactile sensations of the hand. These FUS-evoked EEG potentials (FEP) were observed from both brain hemispheres and shared similarities with somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) from median nerve stimulation. Use of a 0.5 ms pulse duration (PD) sonication given at 70% duty cycle, compared to the use of 1 and 2 ms PD, elicited more distinctive FEP peak features from the hemisphere ipsilateral to sonication. Although several participants reported hearing tones associated with FUS stimulation, the observed FEP were not likely to be confounded by the auditory sensation based on a separate measurement of auditory evoked potentials (AEP) to tonal stimulation (mimicking the same repetition frequency as the FUS stimulation). Off-line changes in resting-state functional connectivity (FC) associated with thalamic stimulation revealed that the FUS stimulation enhanced connectivity in a network of sensorimotor and sensory integration areas, which lasted for at least more than an hour. Clinical neurological evaluations, EEG, and neuroanatomical MRI did not reveal any adverse or unintended effects of sonication, attesting its safety. These results suggest that FUS stimulation may induce long-term neuroplasticity in humans, indicating its neurotherapeutic potential for various neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun-Chul Kim
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Wonhye Lee
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Daniel S Weisholtz
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Seung-Schik Yoo
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kahl CK, Giuffre A, Wrightson JG, Zewdie E, Condliffe EG, MacMaster FP, Kirton A. Reliability of active robotic neuro-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation motor maps. Exp Brain Res 2023; 241:355-364. [PMID: 36525072 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06523-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor mapping is a safe, non-invasive method used to study corticomotor organization and intervention-induced plasticity. Reliability of resting maps is well established, but understudied for active maps and unestablished for active maps obtained using robotic TMS techniques. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability of robotic neuro-navigated TMS motor map measures during active muscle contraction. We hypothesized that map area and volume would show excellent short- and medium-term reliability. Twenty healthy adults were tested on 3 days. Active maps of the first dorsal interosseous muscle were created using a 12 × 12 grid (7 mm spacing). Short- (24 h) and medium-term (3-5 weeks) relative (intra-class correlation coefficient) and absolute (minimal detectable change (MDC); standard error of measure) reliabilities were evaluated for map area, volume, center of gravity (CoG), and hotspot magnitude (peak-to-peak MEP amplitude at the hotspot), along with active motor threshold (AMT) and maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). This study found that AMT and MVC had good-to-excellent short- and medium-term reliability. Map CoG (x and y) were the most reliable map measures across sessions with excellent short- and medium-term reliability (p < 0.001). Map area, hotspot magnitude, and map volume followed with better reliability medium-term than short-term, with a change of 28%, 62%, and 78% needed to detect a true medium-term change, respectively. Therefore, robot-guided neuro-navigated TMS active mapping is relatively reliable but varies across measures. This, and MDC, should be considered in interventional study designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia K Kahl
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adrianna Giuffre
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - James G Wrightson
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ephrem Zewdie
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Elizabeth G Condliffe
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Frank P MacMaster
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Addictions and Mental Health Strategic Clinical Network, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. .,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada. .,Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. .,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. .,Alberta Children's Hospital, 28 Oki Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T3B 6A8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
3D-mapping of TMS effects with automatic robotic placement improved reliability and the risk of spurious correlation. J Neurosci Methods 2022; 381:109689. [PMID: 35987214 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
7
|
Hehl M, Swinnen SP, Van Malderen S, Cuypers K. No evidence for a difference in lateralization and distinctiveness level of transcranial magnetic stimulation-derived cortical motor representations over the adult lifespan. Front Aging Neurosci 2022; 14:971858. [PMID: 36313026 PMCID: PMC9608504 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.971858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the presence and patterns of age-related differences in TMS-based measures of lateralization and distinctiveness of the cortical motor representations of two different hand muscles. In a sample of seventy-three right-handed healthy participants over the adult lifespan, the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) cortical motor representations of both hemispheres were acquired using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). In addition, dexterity and maximum force levels were measured. Lateralization quotients were calculated for homolog behavioral and TMS measures, whereas the distinctiveness between the FDI and ADM representation within one hemisphere was quantified by the center of gravity (CoG) distance and cosine similarity. The presence and patterns of age-related changes were examined using linear, polynomial, and piecewise linear regression. No age-related differences could be identified for the lateralization quotient of behavior or cortical motor representations of both intrinsic hand muscles. Furthermore, no evidence for a change in the distinctiveness of the FDI and ADM representation with advancing age was found. In conclusion this work showed that lateralization and distinctiveness of cortical motor representations, as determined by means of TMS-based measures, remain stable over the adult lifespan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melina Hehl
- Movement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium
- Neuroplasticity and Movement Control Research Group, Rehabilitation Research Institute (REVAL), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Stephan P. Swinnen
- Movement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium
- Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Shanti Van Malderen
- Movement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium
- Neuroplasticity and Movement Control Research Group, Rehabilitation Research Institute (REVAL), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Koen Cuypers
- Movement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium
- Neuroplasticity and Movement Control Research Group, Rehabilitation Research Institute (REVAL), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
- Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Koen Cuypers,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kahl CK, Swansburg R, Hai T, Wrightson JG, Bell T, Lemay JF, Kirton A, MacMaster FP. Differences in neurometabolites and transcranial magnetic stimulation motor maps in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2022; 47:E239-E249. [PMID: 35793906 PMCID: PMC9262400 DOI: 10.1503/jpn.210186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although much is known about cognitive dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), few studies have examined the pathophysiology of disordered motor circuitry. We explored differences in neurometabolite levels and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-derived corticomotor representations among children with ADHD and typically developing children. METHODS We used magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) protocols to measure excitatory (glutamate + glutamine [Glx]) and inhibitory (γ-aminobutyric acid [GABA]) neurometabolite levels in the dominant primary motor cortex (M1) and the supplementary motor area (SMA) in children with ADHD and typically developing children. We used robotic neuronavigated TMS to measure corticospinal excitability and create corticomotor maps. RESULTS We collected data from 26 medication-free children with ADHD (aged 7-16 years) and 25 typically developing children (11-16 years). Children with ADHD had lower M1 Glx (p = 0.044, d = 0.6); their mean resting motor threshold was lower (p = 0.029, d = 0.8); their map area was smaller (p = 0.044, d = 0.7); and their hotspot density was higher (p = 0.008, d = 0.9). M1 GABA levels were associated with motor map area (p = 0.036).Limitations: Some TMS data were lost because the threshold of some children exceeded 100% of the machine output. The relatively large MRS voxel required to obtain sufficient signal-to-noise ratio and reliably measure GABA levels encompassed tissue beyond the M1, making this measure less anatomically specific. CONCLUSION The neurochemistry and neurophysiology of key nodes in the motor network may be altered in children with ADHD, and the differences appear to be related to each other. These findings suggest potentially novel neuropharmacological and neuromodulatory targets for ADHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia K Kahl
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, MacMaster); the Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, Lemay, Kirton, MacMaster); the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Wrightson, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Hai); the Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Bell); the Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kirton); and the Strategic Clinical Network for Addictions and Mental Health, Calgary, Alta. (MacMaster)
| | - Rose Swansburg
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, MacMaster); the Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, Lemay, Kirton, MacMaster); the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Wrightson, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Hai); the Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Bell); the Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kirton); and the Strategic Clinical Network for Addictions and Mental Health, Calgary, Alta. (MacMaster)
| | - Tasmia Hai
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, MacMaster); the Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, Lemay, Kirton, MacMaster); the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Wrightson, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Hai); the Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Bell); the Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kirton); and the Strategic Clinical Network for Addictions and Mental Health, Calgary, Alta. (MacMaster)
| | - James G Wrightson
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, MacMaster); the Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, Lemay, Kirton, MacMaster); the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Wrightson, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Hai); the Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Bell); the Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kirton); and the Strategic Clinical Network for Addictions and Mental Health, Calgary, Alta. (MacMaster)
| | - Tiffany Bell
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, MacMaster); the Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, Lemay, Kirton, MacMaster); the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Wrightson, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Hai); the Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Bell); the Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kirton); and the Strategic Clinical Network for Addictions and Mental Health, Calgary, Alta. (MacMaster)
| | - Jean-François Lemay
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, MacMaster); the Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, Lemay, Kirton, MacMaster); the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Wrightson, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Hai); the Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Bell); the Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kirton); and the Strategic Clinical Network for Addictions and Mental Health, Calgary, Alta. (MacMaster)
| | - Adam Kirton
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, MacMaster); the Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, Lemay, Kirton, MacMaster); the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Wrightson, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Hai); the Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Bell); the Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kirton); and the Strategic Clinical Network for Addictions and Mental Health, Calgary, Alta. (MacMaster)
| | - Frank P MacMaster
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, MacMaster); the Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Swansburg, Lemay, Kirton, MacMaster); the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Wrightson, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kahl, Bell, Kirton, MacMaster); the Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. (Hai); the Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Bell); the Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Kirton); and the Strategic Clinical Network for Addictions and Mental Health, Calgary, Alta. (MacMaster)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kahl CK, Giuffre A, Wrightson JG, Kirton A, Condliffe EG, MacMaster FP, Zewdie E. Active versus resting neuro-navigated robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation motor mapping. Physiol Rep 2022; 10:e15346. [PMID: 35748041 PMCID: PMC9226845 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.15346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor mapping is a safe, non-invasive method that can be used to study corticomotor organization. Motor maps are typically acquired at rest, and comparisons to maps obtained during muscle activation have been both limited and contradictory. Understanding the relationship between functional activation of the corticomotor system as recorded by motor mapping is crucial for their use clinically and in research. The present study utilized robotic TMS paired with personalized neuro-navigation to examine the relationship between resting and active motor map measures and their relationship with motor performance. Twenty healthy right-handed participants underwent resting and active robotic TMS motor mapping of the first dorsal interosseous to 10% maximum voluntary contraction. Motor map parameters including map area, volume, and measures of map centrality were compared between techniques using paired sample tests of difference and Bland-Altman plots and analysis. Map area, volume, and hotspot magnitude were larger in the active motor maps, while map center of gravity and hotspot locations remained consistent between both maps. No associations were observed between motor maps and motor performance as measured by the Purdue Pegboard Test. Our findings support previous suggestions that maps scale with muscle contraction. Differences in mapping outcomes suggest rest and active motor maps may reflect functionally different corticomotor representations. Advanced analysis methods may better characterize the underlying neurophysiology of both types of motor mapping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia K. Kahl
- Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Adrianna Giuffre
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - James G. Wrightson
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Elizabeth G. Condliffe
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Frank P. MacMaster
- Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
- Strategic Clinical Network for Neuroscience, Vision, and RehabilitationCalgaryAlbertaCanada
- Strategic Clinical Network for Addictions and Mental HealthCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Ephrem Zewdie
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kuo HC, Zewdie E, Giuffre A, Gan LS, Carlson HL, Wrightson J, Kirton A. Robotic mapping of motor cortex in children with perinatal stroke and hemiparesis. Hum Brain Mapp 2022; 43:3745-3758. [PMID: 35451540 PMCID: PMC9294290 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain stimulation combined with intensive therapy may improve hand function in children with perinatal stroke‐induced unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP). However, response to therapy varies and underlying neuroplasticity mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we aimed to characterize robotic motor mapping outcomes in children with UCP. Twenty‐nine children with perinatal stroke and UCP (median age 11 ± 2 years) were compared to 24 typically developing controls (TDC). Robotic, neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation was employed to define bilateral motor maps including area, volume, and peak motor evoked potential (MEP). Map outcomes were compared to the primary clinical outcome of the Jebsen–Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTT). Maps were reliably obtained in the contralesional motor cortex (24/29) but challenging in the lesioned hemisphere (5/29). Within the contralesional M1 of participants with UCP, area and peak MEP amplitude of the unaffected map were larger than the affected map. When comparing bilateral maps within the contralesional M1 in children with UCP to that of TDC, only peak MEP amplitudes were different, being smaller for the affected hand as compared to TDC. We observed correlations between the unaffected map when stimulating the contralesional M1 and function of the unaffected hand. Robotic motor mapping can characterize motor cortex neurophysiology in children with perinatal stroke. Map area and peak MEP amplitude may represent discrete biomarkers of developmental plasticity in the contralesional M1. Correlations between map metrics and hand function suggest clinical relevance and utility in studies of interventional plasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsing-Ching Kuo
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute (HBI), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Ephrem Zewdie
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute (HBI), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adrianna Giuffre
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute (HBI), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Liu Shi Gan
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute (HBI), Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Helen L Carlson
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute (HBI), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - James Wrightson
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute (HBI), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute (HBI), Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jadidi AF, Stevenson AJT, Zarei AA, Jensen W, Lontis R. Effect of Modulated TENS on Corticospinal Excitability in Healthy Subjects. Neuroscience 2022; 485:53-64. [PMID: 35031397 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been reported to effectively alleviate chronic pain, including phantom limb pain (PLP). Recently, literature has focused on modulated TENS patterns, such as pulse width modulation (PWM) and burst modulation (BM), as alternatives to conventional, non-modulated (NM) sensory neurostimulation to increase the efficiency of rehabilitation. However, there is still limited knowledge of how these modulated TENS patterns affect corticospinal (CS) and motor cortex activity. Therefore, our aim was to first investigate the effect of modulated TENS patterns on CS activity and corticomotor map in healthy subjects. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were recorded from three muscles before and after the application of TENS interventions. Four different TENS patterns (PWM, BM, NM 40 Hz, and NM 100 Hz) were applied. The results revealed significant facilitation of CS excitability following the PWM intervention. We also found an increase in the volume of the motor cortical map following the application of the PWM and NM (40 Hz). Although PLP alleviation has been reported to be associated with an enhancement of corticospinal excitability, the efficiency of the PWM intervention to induce pain alleviation should be validated in a future clinical study in amputees with PLP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armita Faghani Jadidi
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP) Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark.
| | | | - Ali Asghar Zarei
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP) Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark
| | - Winnie Jensen
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP) Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark
| | - Romulus Lontis
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP) Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kahl CK, Swansburg R, Kirton A, Pringsheim T, Wilcox G, Zewdie E, Harris A, Croarkin PE, Nettel-Aguirre A, Chenji S, MacMaster FP. Targeted Interventions in Tourette's using Advanced Neuroimaging and Stimulation (TITANS): study protocol for a double-blind, randomised controlled trial of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the supplementary motor area in children with Tourette's syndrome. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e053156. [PMID: 34952879 PMCID: PMC8712978 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tourette's syndrome (TS) affects approximately 1% of children. This study will determine the efficacy and safety of paired comprehensive behavioural intervention for tics (CBIT) plus repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment in children with Tourette's syndrome. We hypothesise that CBIT and active rTMS to the supplementary motor area (SMA) will (1) decrease tic severity, and (2) be associated with changes indicative of enhanced neuroplasticity (eg, changes in in vivo metabolite concentrations and TMS neurophysiology measures). METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study will recruit 50 youth with TS, aged 6-18 for a phase II, double-blind, block randomised, sham-controlled trial comparing active rTMS plus CBIT to sham rTMS plus CBIT in a 1:1 ratio. The CBIT protocol is eight sessions over 10 weeks, once a week for 6 weeks and then biweekly. The rTMS protocol is 20 sessions of functional MRI-guided, low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS targeted to the bilateral SMA over 5 weeks (weeks 2-6). MRI, clinical and motor assessments and neurophysiological evaluations including motor mapping will be performed 1 week before CBIT start, 1 week after rTMS treatment and 1 week after CBIT completion. The primary outcome measure is Tourette's symptom change from baseline to post-CBIT treatment, as measured by the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale. Secondary outcomes include changes in imaging, neurophysiological and behavioural markers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval by the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (REB18-0220). The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, on ClinicalTrials.gov and shared with the Tourette and OCD Alberta Network. The results will also be disseminated through the Alberta Addictions and Mental Health Research Hub. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03844919.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia K Kahl
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Rose Swansburg
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tamara Pringsheim
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gabrielle Wilcox
- School and Applied Child Psychology, Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ephrem Zewdie
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ashley Harris
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Paul E Croarkin
- Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Alberto Nettel-Aguirre
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sneha Chenji
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Frank P MacMaster
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Provincial Addictions and Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Giuffre A, Zewdie E, Wrightson JG, Cole L, Carlson HL, Kuo HC, Babwani A, Kirton A. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhanced Motor Learning on Robotic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Maps in Children. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:747840. [PMID: 34690726 PMCID: PMC8526891 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.747840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Conventional transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) may improve motor learning in children. Mechanisms are not understood. Neuronavigated robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can produce individualised maps of primary motor cortex (M1) topography. We aimed to determine the effects of tDCS- and HD-tDCS-enhanced motor learning on motor maps. Methods: Typically developing children aged 12-18 years were randomised to right M1 anodal tDCS, HD-tDCS, or Sham during training of their left-hand on the Purdue Pegboard Task (PPT) over 5 days. Bilateral motor mapping was performed at baseline (pre), day 5 (post), and 6-weeks retention time (RT). Primary muscle was the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) with secondary muscles of abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and adductor digiti minimi (ADM). Primary mapping outcomes were volume (mm2/mV) and area (mm2). Secondary outcomes were centre of gravity (COG, mm) and hotspot magnitude (mV). Linear mixed-effects modelling was employed to investigate effects of time and stimulation type (tDCS, HD-tDCS, Sham) on motor map characteristics. Results: Twenty-four right-handed participants (median age 15.5 years, 52% female) completed the study with no serious adverse events or dropouts. Quality maps could not be obtained in two participants. No effect of time or group were observed on map area or volume. LFDI COG (mm) differed in the medial-lateral plane (x-axis) between tDCS and Sham (p = 0.038) from pre-to-post mapping sessions. Shifts in map COG were also observed for secondary left-hand muscles. Map metrics did not correlate with behavioural changes. Conclusion: Robotic TMS mapping can safely assess motor cortex neurophysiology in children undergoing motor learning and neuromodulation interventions. Large effects on map area and volume were not observed while changes in COG may occur. Larger controlled studies are required to understand the role of motor maps in interventional neuroplasticity in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrianna Giuffre
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ephrem Zewdie
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - James G Wrightson
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Lauran Cole
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Helen L Carlson
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Hsing-Ching Kuo
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Ali Babwani
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sondergaard RE, Martino D, Kiss ZHT, Condliffe EG. TMS Motor Mapping Methodology and Reliability: A Structured Review. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:709368. [PMID: 34489629 PMCID: PMC8417420 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.709368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Motor cortical representation can be probed non-invasively using a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) technique known as motor mapping. The mapping technique can influence features of the maps because of several controllable elements. Here we review the literature on six key motor mapping parameters, as well as their influence on outcome measures and discuss factors impacting their selection. 132 of 1,587 distinct records were examined in detail and synthesized to form the basis of our review. A summary of mapping parameters, their impact on outcome measures and feasibility considerations are reported to support the design and interpretation of TMS mapping studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel E. Sondergaard
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Davide Martino
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Zelma H. T. Kiss
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Elizabeth G. Condliffe
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhang SY, Jeffers MS, Lagace DC, Kirton A, Silasi G. Developmental and Interventional Plasticity of Motor Maps after Perinatal Stroke. J Neurosci 2021; 41:6157-6172. [PMID: 34083257 PMCID: PMC8276736 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3185-20.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Within the perinatal stroke field, there is a need to establish preclinical models where putative biomarkers for motor function can be examined. In a mouse model of perinatal stroke, we evaluated motor map size and movement latency following optogenetic cortical stimulation against three factors of post-stroke biomarker utility: (1) correlation to chronic impairment on a behavioral test battery; (2) amenability to change using a skilled motor training paradigm; and (3) ability to distinguish individuals with potential to respond well to training. Thy1-ChR2-YFP mice received a photothrombotic stroke at postnatal day 7 and were evaluated on a battery of motor tests between days 59 and 70. Following a cranial window implant, mice underwent longitudinal optogenetic motor mapping both before and after 3 weeks of skilled forelimb training. Map size and movement latency of both hemispheres were positively correlated with impaired spontaneous forelimb use, whereas only ipsilesional hemisphere map size was correlated with performance in skilled reaching. Map size and movement latency did not show groupwise changes with training; however, mice with the smallest pretraining map sizes and worst impairments demonstrated the greatest expansion of map size in response to skilled forelimb training. Overall, motor map size showed utility as a potential biomarker for impairment and training-induced modulation in specific individuals. Future assessment of the predictive capacity of post-stroke motor representations for behavioral outcome in animal models opens the possibility of dissecting how plasticity mechanisms contribute to recovery following perinatal stroke.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We investigated the utility of two cortical motor representation measures (motor map size and movement onset latency) as potential biomarkers for post-stroke motor recovery in a mouse model of perinatal stroke. Both motor map size and movement latency were associated with functional recovery after perinatal stroke, with map size showing an additional association between training responsiveness and severity of impairment. Overall, both motor map size and movement onset latency show potential as neurophysiological correlates of recovery. As such, future studies of perinatal stroke rehabilitation and neuromodulation should include these measures to help explain neurophysiological changes that might be occurring in response to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Y Zhang
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5
| | - Matthew S Jeffers
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5
| | - Diane C Lagace
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Neuroscience Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8L6
- Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5
| | - Adam Kirton
- Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Calgary, Alberta, Canada K1H 8M5
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1
| | - Gergely Silasi
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5
- Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kahl CK, Kirton A, Pringsheim T, Croarkin PE, Zewdie E, Swansburg R, Wrightson J, Langevin LM, Macmaster FP. Bilateral transcranial magnetic stimulation of the supplementary motor area in children with Tourette syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol 2021; 63:808-815. [PMID: 33634500 DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM To explore the feasibility and possible effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered to the supplementary motor area (SMA) on tic severity and motor system neurophysiology in children with Tourette syndrome. METHOD Ten children with Tourette syndrome (eight males, two females; 9-15y) participated in this open-label, phase 1 clinical trial. Treatment consisted of 1800 low-frequency (1Hz) neuronavigated robotic rTMS (100% resting motor threshold) to the SMA, bilaterally for 15 sessions. The primary outcome was a change in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) total score from baseline to posttreatment. Secondary outcome measures included changes in magnetic resonance spectroscopy metabolite concentrations, TMS neurophysiology measures, TMS motor maps, and clinical assessments (anxiety, depression) from baseline to the end of treatment. RESULTS The YGTSS score decreased from baseline after treatment (p<0.001; Cohen's d=2.9). All procedures were well-tolerated. INTERPRETATION Robot-driven, neuronavigated bilateral rTMS of the SMA is feasible in children with Tourette syndrome and appears to reduce tic severity. What this paper adds Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is feasible to use in children with Tourette syndrome. rTMS is tolerated by children with Tourette syndrome. Precise targeting of the supplementary motor area using functional magnetic resonance imaging is also feasible in these children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia K Kahl
- Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tamara Pringsheim
- Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Paul E Croarkin
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ephrem Zewdie
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Rose Swansburg
- Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - James Wrightson
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lisa Marie Langevin
- Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Strategic Clinical Network for Neuroscience, Vision, and Rehabilitation, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Frank P Macmaster
- Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Strategic Clinical Network for Addictions and Mental Health, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Perinatal stroke: mapping and modulating developmental plasticity. Nat Rev Neurol 2021; 17:415-432. [PMID: 34127850 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-021-00503-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Most cases of hemiparetic cerebral palsy are caused by perinatal stroke, resulting in lifelong disability for millions of people. However, our understanding of how the motor system develops following such early unilateral brain injury is increasing. Tools such as neuroimaging and brain stimulation are generating informed maps of the unique motor networks that emerge following perinatal stroke. As a focal injury of defined timing in an otherwise healthy brain, perinatal stroke represents an ideal human model of developmental plasticity. Here, we provide an introduction to perinatal stroke epidemiology and outcomes, before reviewing models of developmental plasticity after perinatal stroke. We then examine existing therapeutic approaches, including constraint, bimanual and other occupational therapies, and their potential synergy with non-invasive neurostimulation. We end by discussing the promise of exciting new therapies, including novel neurostimulation, brain-computer interfaces and robotics, all focused on improving outcomes after perinatal stroke.
Collapse
|
18
|
Nazarova M, Novikov P, Ivanina E, Kozlova K, Dobrynina L, Nikulin VV. Mapping of multiple muscles with transcranial magnetic stimulation: absolute and relative test-retest reliability. Hum Brain Mapp 2021; 42:2508-2528. [PMID: 33682975 PMCID: PMC8090785 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The spatial accuracy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may be as small as a few millimeters. Despite such great potential, navigated TMS (nTMS) mapping is still underused for the assessment of motor plasticity, particularly in clinical settings. Here, we investigate the within-limb somatotopy gradient as well as absolute and relative reliability of three hand muscle cortical representations (MCRs) using a comprehensive grid-based sulcus-informed nTMS motor mapping. We enrolled 22 young healthy male volunteers. Two nTMS mapping sessions were separated by 5-10 days. Motor evoked potentials were obtained from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi, and extensor digitorum communis. In addition to individual MRI-based analysis, we studied normalized MNI MCRs. For the reliability assessment, we calculated intraclass correlation and the smallest detectable change. Our results revealed a somatotopy gradient reflected by APB MCR having the most lateral location. Reliability analysis showed that the commonly used metrics of MCRs, such as areas, volumes, centers of gravity (COGs), and hotspots had a high relative and low absolute reliability for all three muscles. For within-limb TMS somatotopy, the most common metrics such as the shifts between MCR COGs and hotspots had poor relative reliability. However, overlaps between different muscle MCRs were highly reliable. We, thus, provide novel evidence that inter-muscle MCR interaction can be reliably traced using MCR overlaps while shifts between the COGs and hotspots of different MCRs are not suitable for this purpose. Our results have implications for the interpretation of nTMS motor mapping results in healthy subjects and patients with neurological conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Nazarova
- Center for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation
- Federal State Budgetary Institution «Federal center of brain research and neurotechnologies» of the Federal Medical Biological AgencyMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Pavel Novikov
- Center for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Ekaterina Ivanina
- Center for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation
| | - Ksenia Kozlova
- Center for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation
| | | | - Vadim V. Nikulin
- Center for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation
- Department of NeurologyMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain SciencesLeipzigGermany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Giuffre A, Zewdie E, Carlson HL, Wrightson JG, Kuo HC, Cole L, Kirton A. Robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation motor maps and hand function in adolescents. Physiol Rep 2021; 9:e14801. [PMID: 33817998 PMCID: PMC8020044 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor mapping can characterize the neurophysiology of the motor system. Limitations including human error and the challenges of pediatric populations may be overcome by emerging robotic systems. We aimed to show that neuronavigated robotic motor mapping in adolescents could efficiently produce discrete maps of individual upper extremity muscles, the characteristics of which would correlate with motor behavior. Methods Typically developing adolescents (TDA) underwent neuronavigated robotic TMS mapping of bilateral motor cortex. Representative maps of first dorsal interosseous (FDI), abductor pollicis brevis (APB), and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles in each hand were created. Map features including area (primary), volume, and center of gravity were analyzed across different excitability regions (R100%, R75%, R50%, R25%). Correlations between map metrics and validated tests of hand motor function (Purdue Pegboard Test as primary) were explored. Results Twenty‐four right‐handed participants (range 12–18 years, median 15.5 years, 52% female) completed bilateral mapping and motor assessments with no serious adverse events or dropouts. Gender and age were associated with hand function and motor map characteristics. Full motor maps (R100%) for FDI did not correlate with motor function in either hand. Smaller excitability subset regions demonstrated reduced variance and dose‐dependent correlations between primary map variables and motor function in the dominant hemisphere. Conclusions Hand function in TDA correlates with smaller subset excitability regions of robotic TMS motor map outcomes. Refined motor maps may have less variance and greater potential to quantify interventional neuroplasticity. Robotic TMS mapping is safe and feasible in adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrianna Giuffre
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ephrem Zewdie
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Helen L Carlson
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - James G Wrightson
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Hsing-Ching Kuo
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Lauran Cole
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rossi S, Antal A, Bestmann S, Bikson M, Brewer C, Brockmöller J, Carpenter LL, Cincotta M, Chen R, Daskalakis JD, Di Lazzaro V, Fox MD, George MS, Gilbert D, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Ilmoniemi RJ, Lefaucheur JP, Leocani L, Lisanby SH, Miniussi C, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Peterchev AV, Quartarone A, Rotenberg A, Rothwell J, Rossini PM, Santarnecchi E, Shafi MM, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wassermann EM, Zangen A, Ziemann U, Hallett M. Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 132:269-306. [PMID: 33243615 PMCID: PMC9094636 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 536] [Impact Index Per Article: 178.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
This article is based on a consensus conference, promoted and supported by the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN), which took place in Siena (Italy) in October 2018. The meeting intended to update the ten-year-old safety guidelines for the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in research and clinical settings (Rossi et al., 2009). Therefore, only emerging and new issues are covered in detail, leaving still valid the 2009 recommendations regarding the description of conventional or patterned TMS protocols, the screening of subjects/patients, the need of neurophysiological monitoring for new protocols, the utilization of reference thresholds of stimulation, the managing of seizures and the list of minor side effects. New issues discussed in detail from the meeting up to April 2020 are safety issues of recently developed stimulation devices and pulse configurations; duties and responsibility of device makers; novel scenarios of TMS applications such as in the neuroimaging context or imaging-guided and robot-guided TMS; TMS interleaved with transcranial electrical stimulation; safety during paired associative stimulation interventions; and risks of using TMS to induce therapeutic seizures (magnetic seizure therapy). An update on the possible induction of seizures, theoretically the most serious risk of TMS, is provided. It has become apparent that such a risk is low, even in patients taking drugs acting on the central nervous system, at least with the use of traditional stimulation parameters and focal coils for which large data sets are available. Finally, new operational guidelines are provided for safety in planning future trials based on traditional and patterned TMS protocols, as well as a summary of the minimal training requirements for operators, and a note on ethics of neuroenhancement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Rossi
- Department of Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Neuroscienze, Unit of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Brain Investigation and Neuromodulation Lab (SI-BIN Lab), University of Siena, Italy.
| | - Andrea Antal
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University of Goettingen, Germany; Institue of Medical Psychology, Otto-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Sven Bestmann
- Department of Movement and Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK and Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carmen Brewer
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jürgen Brockmöller
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University of Goettingen, Germany
| | - Linda L Carpenter
- Butler Hospital, Brown University Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Massimo Cincotta
- Unit of Neurology of Florence - Central Tuscany Local Health Authority, Florence, Italy
| | - Robert Chen
- Krembil Research Institute and Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeff D Daskalakis
- Center for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
| | - Michael D Fox
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Donald Gilbert
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Vasilios K Kimiskidis
- Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Greece
| | | | - Risto J Ilmoniemi
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering (NBE), Aalto University School of Science, Aalto, Finland
| | - Jean Pascal Lefaucheur
- EA 4391, ENT Team, Faculty of Medicine, Paris Est Creteil University (UPEC), Créteil, France; Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, (APHP), Créteil, France
| | - Letizia Leocani
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), IRCCS-San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
| | - Sarah H Lisanby
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Carlo Miniussi
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Frank Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alvaro Pascual-Leone
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research and Center for Memory Health, Hebrew SeniorLife, USA; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Guttmann Brain Health Institut, Institut Guttmann, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Spain
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University of Goettingen, Germany
| | - Angel V Peterchev
- Departments of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical & Computer Engineering, and Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Angelo Quartarone
- Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Alexander Rotenberg
- Department of Neurology, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John Rothwell
- Department of Movement and Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK and Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Paolo M Rossini
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, IRCCS San Raffaele-Pisana, Roma, Italy
| | - Emiliano Santarnecchi
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mouhsin M Shafi
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hartwig R Siebner
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yoshikatzu Ugawa
- Department of Human Neurophysiology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Eric M Wassermann
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Abraham Zangen
- Zlotowski Center of Neuroscience, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mark Hallett
- Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Säisänen L, Könönen M, Niskanen E, Lakka T, Lintu N, Vanninen R, Julkunen P, Määttä S. Primary hand motor representation areas in healthy children, preadolescents, adolescents, and adults. Neuroimage 2020; 228:117702. [PMID: 33385558 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of the organization of the motor representation areas in children and adolescents is not well-known. This cross-sectional study aimed to provide an understanding for the development of the functional motor areas of the upper extremity muscles by studying healthy right-handed children (6-9 years, n = 10), preadolescents (10-12 years, n = 13), adolescents (15-17 years, n = 12), and adults (22-34 years, n = 12). The optimal representation site and resting motor threshold (rMT) for the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) were assessed in both hemispheres using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS). Motor mapping was performed at 110% of the rMT while recording the EMG of six upper limb muscles in the hand and forearm. The association between the motor map and manual dexterity (box and block test, BBT) was examined. The mapping was well-tolerated and feasible in all but the youngest participant whose rMT exceeded the maximum stimulator output. The centers-of-gravity (CoG) for individual muscles were scattered to the greatest extent in the group of preadolescents and centered and became more focused with age. In preadolescents, the CoGs in the left hemisphere were located more laterally, and they shifted medially with age. The proportion of hand compared to arm representation increased with age (p = 0.001); in the right hemisphere, this was associated with greater fine motor ability. Similarly, there was less overlap between hand and forearm muscles representations in children compared to adults (p<0.001). There was a posterior-anterior shift in the APB hotspot coordinate with age, and the APB coordinate in the left hemisphere exhibited a lateral to medial shift with age from adolescence to adulthood (p = 0.006). Our results contribute to the elucidation of the developmental course in the organization of the motor cortex and its associations with fine motor skills. It was shown that nTMS motor mapping in relaxed muscles is feasible in developmental studies in children older than seven years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Säisänen
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, 70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Finland; Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
| | - Mervi Könönen
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, 70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland; Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland; Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Eini Niskanen
- Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Timo Lakka
- Institute of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Finland; Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Niina Lintu
- Institute of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Finland
| | - Ritva Vanninen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Finland; Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Petro Julkunen
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, 70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland; Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sara Määttä
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, 70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Giuffre A, Kahl CK, Zewdie E, Wrightson JG, Bourgeois A, Condliffe EG, Kirton A. Reliability of robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation motor mapping. J Neurophysiol 2020; 125:74-85. [PMID: 33146067 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00527.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive and safe tool that produces cortical motor maps using neuronavigational and neuroanatomical images. Motor maps are individualized representations of the primary motor cortex (M1) topography that may reflect developmental and interventional plasticity. Results of TMS motor map reliability testing have been variable, and robotic measures are undefined. We aimed to determine the short- and long-term reliability of robotic TMS motor maps. Twenty healthy participants underwent motor mapping at baseline, 24 h, and 4 wk. A 12 × 12 grid (7-mm spacing) was placed over the left M1, centered over the hand knob area. Four suprathreshold stimulations were delivered at each grid point. First dorsal interosseous (FDI) motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were analyzed offline to generate map characteristics of area, volume, center of gravity (COG), and hotspot magnitude. Subsets of each outcome corresponding to 75%, 50%, and 25% of each map were determined. Reliability measures including intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), minimal detectable change (MDC), and standard error of measure (SEM) were calculated. Map volume, COG, and hotspot magnitude were the most reliable measures (good-to-excellent) over both short- and long-term sessions. Map area reliability was poor-to-moderate for short- and long-term sessions. Smaller map percentile subsets showed decreased variability but only minimal improvements in reliability. MDC for most outcomes was >50%. Procedures were well tolerated with no serious adverse events. Robotic TMS motor mapping is relatively reliable over time, but careful consideration of specific outcomes is required for this method to interrogate plasticity in the human motor system.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive and safe tool that produces cortical motor maps-individualized representations of the primary motor cortex (M1) topography-that may reflect developmental and interventional plasticity. This study is the first to evaluate short- and long-term relative and absolute reliability of TMS mapping outcomes at various M1 excitability levels using novel robotic neuronavigated TMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrianna Giuffre
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Cynthia K Kahl
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ephrem Zewdie
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - James G Wrightson
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Anna Bourgeois
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Elizabeth G Condliffe
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Developmental Remodelling of the Motor Cortex in Hemiparetic Children With Perinatal Stroke. Pediatr Neurol 2020; 112:34-43. [PMID: 32911261 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perinatal stroke often leads to lifelong motor impairment. Two common subtypes differ in timing, location, and mechanism of injury: periventricular venous infarcts (PVI) are fetal white matter lesions while most arterial ischemic strokes (AIS) are cortical injuries acquired near term birth. Both alter motor system development and primary motor cortex (M1) plasticity, often with retained ipsilateral corticospinal fibers from the non-lesioned motor cortex (M1'). METHODS Task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to define patterns of motor cortex activity during paretic and unaffected hand movement. Peak coordinates of M1, M1', and the supplementary motor area in the lesioned and intact hemispheres were compared to age-matched controls. Correlations between displacements and clinical motor function were explored. RESULTS Forty-nine participants included 14 PVI (12.59 ± 3.7 years), 13 AIS (14.91 ± 3.9 years), and 22 controls (13.91 ± 3.4 years). AIS displayed the greatest M1 displacement from controls in the lesioned hemisphere while PVI locations approximated controls. Peak M1' activations were displaced from the canonical hand knob in both PVI and AIS. Extent of M1 and M1' displacement were correlated (r = 0.50, P = 0.025) but were not associated with motor function. Supplementary motor area activity elicited by paretic tapping was displaced in AIS compared to controls (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION Motor network components may be displaced in both hemispheres after perinatal stroke, particularly in AIS and those with ipsilateral control of the affected limb. Modest correlations with clinical function may support that more complex models of developmental plasticity are needed to inform targets for individualized neuromodulatory therapies in children with perinatal stroke.
Collapse
|
24
|
Strzalkowski NDJ, Sondergaard RE, Gan LS, Kiss ZHT. Case studies in neuroscience: deep brain stimulation changes upper limb cortical motor maps in dystonia. J Neurophysiol 2020; 124:268-273. [PMID: 32579422 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00159.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus pars interna (GPi-DBS) is an effective treatment for primary dystonia; however, its therapeutic mechanism is poorly understood. Because improvement is gradual, GPi-DBS treatment likely involves short- and long-term mechanisms. Abnormal plasticity resulting in somatotopic reorganization is involved in the development of dystonia and has been proposed as a possible mechanism for this gradual improvement, yet it has not been directly investigated. We hypothesized that GPi-DBS will lead to progressive changes in the cortical representations (motor maps) of upper limb muscles. Neuronavigated robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to map the cortical representation of five upper limb muscles in six healthy controls and a 45-yr-old female cervical dystonia patient before (Pre) and at four time points (Post5 to Post314), 5 to 314 days after GPi-DBS. Motor map area and volume decreased in all muscles following GPi-DBS, while changes in overlap and center of gravity distance between muscles were variable. Despite these motor map changes, only dystonic tremor improved after a year of DBS; neck position worsened slightly. These preliminary findings suggest that GPi-DBS may reduce the cortical representation and excitability of upper limb muscles in dystonia and that these changes can occur without clinical improvement.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Neuronavigated robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to investigate changes in upper limb muscle representation in a cervical dystonia patient before and at four time points up to 314 days after globus pallidus pars interna deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS). GPi-DBS altered excitability and motor cortical representation of upper limb muscles; however, these changes were not associated with clinical improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas D J Strzalkowski
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Departments of Biology and General Education, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Rachel E Sondergaard
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Liu Shi Gan
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Zelma H T Kiss
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Li WQ, Lin T, Li X, Jing YH, Wu C, Li MN, Ding Q, Lan Y, Xu GQ. TMS brain mapping of the pharyngeal cortical representation in healthy subjects. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:891-899. [PMID: 32289722 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2019] [Revised: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain mapping is fundamental to understanding brain organization and function. However, a major drawback to the traditional Brodmann parcellation technique is the reliance on the use of postmortem specimens. It has therefore historically been difficult to make any comparison regarding functional data from different regions or hemispheres within the same individual. Moreover, this method has been significant limited by subjective boundaries and classification criteria and therefore suffer from reproducibility issues. The development of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) offers an alternative approach to brain mapping, specifically the motor cortical regions by eliciting quantifiable functional reactions. OBJECTIVE To precisely describe the motor cortical topographic representation of pharyngeal constrictor musculature using TMS and to further map the brain for use as a tool to study brain plasticity. METHODS 51 healthy subjects (20 male/31 female, 19-26 years old) were tested using single-pulse TMS combined with intraluminal catheter-guided high-resolution manometry and a standardized grid cap. We investigated various parameters of the motor-evoked potential (MEP) that include the motor map area, amplitude, latency, center of gravity (CoG) and asymmetry index. RESULTS Cortically evoked response latencies were similar for the left and right hemispheres at 6.79 ± 0.22 and 7.24 ± 0.27 ms, respectively. The average scalp positions (relative to the vertex) of the pharyngeal motor cortical representation were 10.40 ± 0.19 (SE) cm medio-lateral and 3.20 ± 0.20 (SE) cm antero-posterior in the left hemisphere and 9.65 ± 0.24 (SE) cm medio-lateral and 3.18 ± 0.23 (SE) cm antero-posterior in the right hemisphere. The mean motor map area of the pharynx in the left and right hemispheres were 9.22 ± 0.85(SE) cm2and 10.12 ± 1.24(SE) cm2, respectively. The amplitudes of the MEPs were 35.94 ± 1.81(SE)uV in the left hemisphere and 34.49 ± 1.95(SE)uV in the right hemisphere. By comparison, subtle but consistent differences in the degree of the bilateral hemispheric representation were also apparent both between and within individuals. CONCLUSION The swallowing musculature has a bilateral motor cortical representation across individuals, but is largely asymmetric within single subjects. These results suggest that TMS mapping using a guided intra-pharyngeal EMG catheter combined with a standardized gridded cap might be a useful tool to localize brain function/dysfunction by linking brain activation to the corresponding physical reaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wan-Qi Li
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Tuo Lin
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Xue Li
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Ying-Hua Jing
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Cheng Wu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Meng-Ni Li
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qian Ding
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yue Lan
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Guang-Qing Xu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zewdie E, Ciechanski P, Kuo HC, Giuffre A, Kahl C, King R, Cole L, Godfrey H, Seeger T, Swansburg R, Damji O, Rajapakse T, Hodge J, Nelson S, Selby B, Gan L, Jadavji Z, Larson JR, MacMaster F, Yang JF, Barlow K, Gorassini M, Brunton K, Kirton A. Safety and tolerability of transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation in children: Prospective single center evidence from 3.5 million stimulations. Brain Stimul 2019; 13:565-575. [PMID: 32289678 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Revised: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-invasive brain stimulation is being increasingly used to interrogate neurophysiology and modulate brain function. Despite the high scientific and therapeutic potential of non-invasive brain stimulation, experience in the developing brain has been limited. OBJECTIVE To determine the safety and tolerability of non-invasive neurostimulation in children across diverse modalities of stimulation and pediatric populations. METHODS A non-invasive brain stimulation program was established in 2008 at our pediatric, academic institution. Multi-disciplinary neurophysiological studies included single- and paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) methods. Motor mapping employed robotic TMS. Interventional trials included repetitive TMS (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Standardized safety and tolerability measures were completed prospectively by all participants. RESULTS Over 10 years, 384 children underwent brain stimulation (median 13 years, range 0.8-18.0). Populations included typical development (n = 118), perinatal stroke/cerebral palsy (n = 101), mild traumatic brain injury (n = 121) neuropsychiatric disorders (n = 37), and other (n = 7). No serious adverse events occurred. Drop-outs were rare (<1%). No seizures were reported despite >100 participants having brain injuries and/or epilepsy. Tolerability between single and paired-pulse TMS (542340 stimulations) and rTMS (3.0 million stimulations) was comparable and favourable. TMS-related headache was more common in perinatal stroke (40%) than healthy participants (13%) but was mild and self-limiting. Tolerability improved over time with side-effect frequency decreasing by >50%. Robotic TMS motor mapping was well-tolerated though neck pain was more common than with manual TMS (33% vs 3%). Across 612 tDCS sessions including 92 children, tolerability was favourable with mild itching/tingling reported in 37%. CONCLUSIONS Standard non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms are safe and well-tolerated in children and should be considered minimal risk. Advancement of applications in the developing brain are warranted. A new and improved pediatric NIBS safety and tolerability form is included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Zewdie
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - P Ciechanski
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - H C Kuo
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - A Giuffre
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - C Kahl
- Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - R King
- Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - L Cole
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - H Godfrey
- Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - T Seeger
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - R Swansburg
- Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - O Damji
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - T Rajapakse
- Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - J Hodge
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - S Nelson
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - B Selby
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - L Gan
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Z Jadavji
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - J R Larson
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - F MacMaster
- Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - J F Yang
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - K Barlow
- Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - M Gorassini
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - K Brunton
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - A Kirton
- Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|