Longitudinally extensive optic neuritis as an MRI biomarker distinguishes neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis

Magnetic resonance imaging-based biomarkers of multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) are neuroinflammatory conditions with overlapping clinical and imaging features. Distinguishing between these diseases is crucial for appropriate diagnosis and management. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may have the potential to differentiate these disorders. Nonetheless, studies exhibit inconsistencies regarding which MRI measurements most effectively distinguish between these disorders. Hence, this review aimed to evaluate the differences in MRI volumetry between people with MS (PwMS) and people with NMOSD (PwNMOSD).

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science up to May 12, 2024, to identify studies assessing conventional and volumetric MRI in PwMS and PwNMOSD. The standard mean difference (SMD) of MRI measurements and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using R version 4.4.0 with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Forty-eight original studies that assessed conventional MRI measurements in 2592 PwMS and 1979 PwNMOSD were included. The meta-analysis revealed that PwMS had significantly higher T2 lesion volume (SMD = 1.51, 95% CI: 0.53 to 2.48, p = 0.002) and T1 lesion count (SMD = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.6, p < 0.001) than PwNMOSD. PwMS also exhibited significantly reduced thalamic volume (SMD = -1.26, 95% CI: -1.8 to -0.73, p < 0.001) and grey matter volume (GMV) (SMD = -0.65, 95% CI: -0.92 to -0.37, p < 0.001). Other MRI volumetry, such as the brain and putamen volumes, showed more pronounced atrophy in PwMS.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in MRI volumetry between MS and NMOSD highlight the potential of MRI as a critical diagnostic tool. These findings emphasize the need for standardized MRI protocols and advanced imaging techniques to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical management of these conditions.

Recent advances in neuro-ophthalmology

This review article represents a collaborative effort across continents, bringing together the latest developments in neuro-ophthalmology with a focus on innovative diagnostic and therapeutic modalities that are shaping the future of the field. Among the most significant advancements is the rise of optical coherence tomography (OCT), now recognized as an indispensable tool in neuro-ophthalmological research, providing unparalleled insights into optic nerve and central nervous system pathologies. Gene therapy, particularly for conditions such as Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy, marks a new frontier in personalized medicine, offering hope for previously untreatable conditions. The article also examines the transformative role of telemedicine and artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice, which are revolutionizing patient care and enhancing diagnostic precision. Furthermore, it highlights the impact of novel serological biomarkers on the understanding and management of immune-mediated optic neuritis, and discusses the introduction of new therapeutic agents like Tocilizumab and Teprotumumab, which are redefining treatment paradigms. Collectively, these advancements reflect the profound influence of modern medicine on neuro-ophthalmology, paving the way for improved patient outcomes and fostering new avenues for research and clinical practice.

Accuracy of Diagnosing Optic Neuritis Using DANTE T1-SPACE Imaging

Purpose

To evaluate the use of delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation-prepared T1-weighted turbo spin echo (DANTE T1-SPACE) imaging for diagnosing optic neuritis and to analyze its correlation with clinical findings before and after treatment.

Patients and Methods

Patients diagnosed with optic neuritis or non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NA-AION) were evaluated at the Ophthalmology Department of Kyoto University Hospital. All patients underwent magnetic resonance (MR) studies before treatment initiation and ophthalmic examinations before and after treatment. Three ophthalmologists independently reviewed the MR scans for abnormalities. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments included post-contrast DANTE T1-SPACE, post-contrast volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE), and short T1 inversion recovery (STIR) scans. The presence of abnormalities in each sequence was determined.

Results

Of 36 eyes from 30 patients, 21 eyes from 17 patients were diagnosed with optic neuritis, and 15 eyes from 13 patients were diagnosed with NA-AION. DANTE T1-SPACE sequences showed better sensitivity for detecting optic neuritis than STIR sequences (100% vs 67%, p = 0.009). VIBE images did not confirm enhancement of lesions in some cases with optic neuritis. No differences were observed among the sequences for NA-AION. Lesion length evaluated by DANTE T1-SPACE sequences was associated with circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness at the initial visit, eye pain, and the time interval from symptom onset to MRI scan.

Conclusion

Contrast-enhanced DANTE T1-SPACE was better than other sequences of MRI for diagnosing optic neuritis.

Classification of optic neuritis in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) on MRI using CNN with transfer learning and manipulation of pre-processing on augmentation

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), also known as Devic disease, is an autoimmune central nervous system disorder in humans that commonly causes inflammatory demyelination in the optic nerves and spinal cord. Inflammation in the optic nerves is termed optic neuritis (ON). ON is a common clinical presentation; however, it is not necessarily present in all NMOSD patients. ON in NMOSD can be relapsing and result in severe vision loss. To the best of our knowledge, no study utilises deep learning to classify ON changes on MRI among patients with NMOSD. Therefore, this study aims to deploy eight state-of-the-art CNN models (Inception-v3, Inception-ResNet-v2, ResNet-101, Xception, ShuffleNet, DenseNet-201, MobileNet-v2, and EfficientNet-B0) with transfer learning to classify NMOSD patients with and without chronic ON using optic nerve magnetic resonance imaging. This study also investigated the effects of data augmentation before and after dataset splitting on cropped and whole images. Both quantitative and qualitative assessments (with Grad-Cam) were used to evaluate the performances of the CNN models. The Inception-v3 was identified as the best CNN model for classifying ON among NMOSD patients, with accuracy of 99.5%, sensitivity of 98.9%, specificity of 93.0%, precision of 100%, NPV of 99.0%, and F1-score of 99.4%. This study also demonstrated that the application of augmentation after dataset splitting could avoid information leaking into the testing datasets, hence producing more realistic and reliable results.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: Exploring the diverse clinical manifestations and the need for further exploration

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by inflammatory assaults on the central nervous system (CNS), particularly on the optic nerves and spinal cord. In recent years, a wider range of clinical manifestations of this complex disease have been observed, emphasizing the importance of gaining a more profound understanding beyond optic neuritis (ON) and transverse myelitis (TM).

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE

This study explores the many clinical symptoms of NMOSD, including common and uncommon presentations. Distinctive aspects of ON, TM, and diencephalic/brainstem syndromes are examined, highlighting their unique characteristics in contrast to conditions such as multiple sclerosis. We also discuss extra-CNS involvement, such as unusual signs, including muscle involvement, retinal injury, auditory impairment, and rhinological symptoms.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Our study intends to highlight the wide range and complexity of NMOSD presentations, emphasizing the significance of identifying unusual symptoms for precise diagnosis and prompt management. The specific processes that contribute to the varied clinical presentation of NMOSD are not well understood despite existing information. This emphasizes the necessity for more study to clarify the mechanisms that cause different symptoms and discover new treatment targets for this complex autoimmune disorder.

CONCLUSION

It is essential to acknowledge the complex and varied clinical manifestations of NMOSD to enhance diagnosis, treatment, and patient results. By enhancing our comprehension of the fundamental processes and investigating innovative therapeutic approaches, we may aim to enhance the quality of life for persons impacted by this illness.

Uncovering the Diagnostic Challenge of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease: A Case Study of Acute Bilateral Vision Loss

We discuss a perplexing case of a 51-year-old female with a history of asthma and morbid obesity, presenting with acute bilateral vision loss of unknown etiology. The patient's clinical course was marked by a constellation of symptoms, including blurry vision, eyeball pain, photophobia, headache, nausea, and dizziness, prompting a multidisciplinary approach for diagnostic evaluation. Despite a comprehensive workup and a temporal artery biopsy ruling out large vessel arteritis, the etiology of vision loss remained elusive until myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody testing returned positive, implicating myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). High-dose corticosteroid therapy was initiated. However, the patient had worsening visual symptoms and was started on plasmapheresis and subsequent administration of Rituximab to prevent relapses, along with a long-term steroid taper regimen. This case underscores the diagnostic challenge of optic neuritis, particularly in MOGAD. It emphasizes the importance of a thorough evaluation and multidisciplinary collaboration.

Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Update and Clinically-Oriented Radiologic Reporting

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the nervous system. MR imaging findings play an integral part in establishing diagnostic hallmarks of the disease during initial diagnosis and evaluating disease status. Multiple iterations of diagnostic criteria and consensus guidelines are put forth by various expert groups incorporating imaging of the brain and spine, and efforts have been made to standardize imaging protocols for MS. Emerging ancillary imaging findings have also attracted increasing interests and should be sought for on radiologic examination. In this paper, the authors review the clinical guidelines and approach to imaging of MS and related disorders, focusing on clinically impactful image interpretation and MR imaging reporting.

Immune-Mediated Myelopathies

OBJECTIVE

Immune-mediated myelopathies are conditions in which the immune system attacks the spinal cord. This article describes the distinguishing characteristics of immune-mediated myelopathies and treatment strategies for patients affected by these disorders.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

New biomarkers, such as aquaporin 4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies, in the blood and spinal fluid have led to the identification of antigen-specific immune-mediated myelopathies and approved therapies to prevent disease progression.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

The first step in the diagnosis of an immune-mediated myelopathy is confirming that the immune system is the cause of the attack by excluding non-immune-mediated causes. The second step is to narrow the differential diagnosis based on objective biomarkers such as serology and MRI patterns. The third step is to treat the specific immune-mediated myelopathy by using evidence-based medicine.

Utility of the 2023 international MOGAD panel proposed criteria in clinical practice: An institutional cohort

BACKGROUND

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is a recently defined demyelinating disorder with a rapidly evolving clinical spectrum. Recently, consensus criteria have been proposed (Banwell et al., 2023) to help with disease diagnosis. However, validation of the proposed criteria in real-life MOGAD patients is lacking. In this study, we applied the proposed criteria to an institutional cohort of MOG antibody-positive patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary neuroimmunology clinic from 2018 to 2023. Patients who had at least one core clinical feature of MOGAD and positive serum MOG antibody by cell-based assay were included. Demographics and clinical data were recorded and analyzed. Cases were divided into definite MOGAD, questionable MOGAD, and false-positive MOG antibody as determined by the treating neuroimmunology and/or neuro-ophthalmology specialists prior to applying the new MOGAD criteria by an independent investigator. We then calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the new criteria compared to the treating physicians' assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients were included of which, 19 (70.4%) were female, the average age of the sample was 44 +/- 15 years. High titer MOG antibody (≥ 1:100) was found in 11 patients (40.7%); low titer (< 1: 100) in 13 (48.1%), and unreported titer in 3 patients. As determined by expert opinion; 18 (66.7%) were identified as definitive MOGAD, 6 (22.2%) as false-positive MOG antibody, and 3 (11.1%) as questionable MOGAD. All 18 patients identified by clinicians as definite MOGAD met the new 2023 criteria. Of the 9 patients with questionable MOGAD or false-positive MOG antibody, four patients met the 2023 MOGAD criteria. Those four patients had the following final diagnoses: CNS vasculitis, primary progressive MS with activity and progression, pseudotumor cerebri, and bevacizumab-induced anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in the setting of paraneoplastic retinopathy. Compared to clinician assessment, applying the 2023 MOGAD criteria to our institutional cohort yielded a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 55.5%, a positive predictive value of 81.5% and a negative predictive value of 100%.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the 2023 MOGAD criteria are highly sensitive for detection of definite MOGAD but has modest specificity. A number of MOGAD mimickers can resemble the core clinical events of MOGAD and share similar supportive clinical and MRI features. Clinicians should practice caution when evaluating patients with low titer MOG antibody even if they meet the additional supportive features proposed by the 2023 criteria. Further studies are needed to evaluate the 2023 criteria in larger cohorts and in the pediatric population.

Predicting the final clinical phenotype after the first attack of optic neuritis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the factors determining the final clinical phenotype after an initial isolated attack of optic neuritis (ON). ON could be an isolated event or the initial presentation of a chronic neuroimmunological condition.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients presenting to University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center for an initial, isolated attack of ON. Final clinical phenotypes were idiopathic ON, multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein associated disease (MOGAD), or secondary ON (e.g. neurosarcoidosis). Several potential predictors at the time of initial presentation were compared among the different phenotypes to determine early predictors. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson χ2 or Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables were compared using independent t-test.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients met criteria (average age 41.3 ± 13.3, 78.1% females). Average time to final diagnosis was 8.3 months, and average follow-up was 47 months. The final phenotypes were MS (22, 34%), idiopathic ON (14, 22%), MOGAD (11, 17%), NMOSD (10, 16%), and secondary ON (7, 11%). White race, unilateral ON, short segment hyperintensity on orbital MRI, classical demyelination on brain MRI, and not requiring PLEX were associated with MS. Older age, poor steroid responsiveness, and requiring PLEX were associated with NMOSD. African American race, bilateral ON, papillitis on fundoscopy, long segment hyperintensity on orbital MRI, and normal brain MRI were associated with MOGAD. Normal or thinned retinal nerve fiber layer on OCT, short segment hyperintensity on orbital MRI, and normal brain MRI were associated with idiopathic ON.

CONCLUSION

The final clinical phenotype may be predictable at the time of initial ON presentation. This requires a careful evaluation of patient demographics, treatment response, funduscopic findings, OCT, and orbital and brain MRIs. Utilizing early predictors in clinical practice could better inform prognosis and management decisions.

MRI pattern in acute optic neuritis: Comparing multiple sclerosis, NMO and MOGAD

BACKGROUND

Several MRI findings of optic neuritis (ON) have been described and correlated with specific underlying etiologies. Specifically, optic nerve enhancement is considered an accurate biomarker of acute ON.

OBJECTIVE

To identify differences in MRI patterns of optic nerve enhancement in certain demyelinating etiologies presenting with acute ON.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of enhancement patterns on fat-suppressed T1-weighted images from patients presenting clinical and radiological acute ON, treated at our institution between January 2014 and June 2022. Location and extension of enhancing optic nerve segments, as well as presence of perineural enhancement were evaluated in three predetermined demyelinating conditions. Fisher's exact test and chi2 were calculated.

RESULTS

Fifty-six subjects met eligibility criteria. Mean age was 31 years (range 6-79) and 70% were females. Thirty-four (61%) patients were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS), 8 (14%) with neuromyelitis optica (NMO), and 14 (25%) with anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein disease (MOGAD). Bilateral involvement was more frequent in MOGAD, compared to MS and NMO (43 vs 3% and 12.5% respectively, p = 0.002). MS patients showed shorter optic nerve involvement, whereas MOGAD showed more extensive lesions (p = 0.006). Site of involvement was intraorbital in 63% MS, 89% NMO, 90% MOGAD (p = 0.051) and canalicular in 43% MS, 33% NMO and 75% MOGAD (p = 0.039). Intracranial or chiasmatic involvement and presence of perineural enhancement were not statistically different between entities.

CONCLUSION

In the setting of acute ON, patients presenting MOGAD were more likely to show bilateral, longitudinally extended and anterior (intraorbital and canalicular) optic nerve involvement compared to patients with MS or NMO.

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: Clinical Perspectives, Molecular Mechanisms, and Treatments

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a rare autoimmune inflammatory disorder affecting the central nervous system (CNS), specifically the optic nerve and the spinal cord, with severe clinical manifestations, including optic neuritis (ON) and transverse myelitis. Initially, NMO was wrongly understood as a condition related to multiple sclerosis (MS), due to a few similar clinical and radiological features, until the discovery of the AQP4 antibody (NMO-IgG/AQP4-ab). Various etiological factors, such as genetic-environmental factors, medication, low levels of vitamins, and others, contribute to the initiation of NMO pathogenesis. The autoantibodies against AQP4 target the AQP4 channel at the blood–brain barrier (BBB) of the astrocyte end feet, which leads to high permeability or leakage of the BBB that causes more influx of AQP4-antibodies into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of NMO patients. The binding of AQP4-IgG onto the AQP4 extracellular epitopes initiates astrocyte damage through complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Thus, a membrane attack complex is formed due to complement cascade activation; the membrane attack complex targets the AQP4 channels in the astrocytes, leading to astrocyte cell damage, demyelination of neurons and oligodendrocytes, and neuroinflammation. The treatment of NMOSD could improve relapse symptoms, restore neurological functions, and alleviate immunosuppression. Corticosteroids, apheresis therapies, immunosuppressive drugs, and B cell inactivating and complement cascade blocking agents have been used to treat NMOSD. This review intends to provide all possible recent studies related to molecular mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and treatment methodologies of the disease, particularly focusing on recent developments in clinical criteria and therapeutic formulations.

Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelits optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part I: Diagnosis and differential diagnosis

The term 'neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders' (NMOSD) is used as an umbrella term that refers to aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG)-positive neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and its formes frustes and to a number of closely related clinical syndromes without AQP4-IgG. NMOSD were originally considered subvariants of multiple sclerosis (MS) but are now widely recognized as disorders in their own right that are distinct from MS with regard to immunopathogenesis, clinical presentation, optimum treatment, and prognosis. In part 1 of this two-part article series, which ties in with our 2014 recommendations, the neuromyelitis optica study group (NEMOS) gives updated recommendations on the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of NMOSD. A key focus is on differentiating NMOSD from MS and from myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM; also termed MOG antibody-associated disease, MOGAD), which shares significant similarity with NMOSD with regard to clinical and, partly, radiological presentation, but is a pathogenetically distinct disease. In part 2, we provide updated recommendations on the treatment of NMOSD, covering all newly approved drugs as well as established treatment options.

Evaluation of transorbital sonography measures of optic nerve diameter in the context of global and regional brain volume in multiple sclerosis

Transorbital sonography (TOS) could be a swift and convenient method to detect the atrophy of the optic nerve, possibly providing a marker that might reflect other quantitative structural markers of multiple sclerosis (MS). Here we evaluate the utility of TOS as a complementary tool for assessing optic nerve atrophy, and investigate how TOS-derived measures correspond to volumetric brain markers in MS. We recruited 25 healthy controls (HC) and 45 patients with relapsing-remitting MS and performed B-mode ultrasonographic examination of the optic nerve. Patients additionally underwent MRI scans to obtain T1-weighted, FLAIR and STIR images. Optic nerve diameters (OND) were compared between HC, MS patients with and without history of optic neuritis (non-ON) using a mixed-effects ANOVA model. The relationship between within-subject-average OND and global and regional brain volumetric measures was investigated using FSL SIENAX, voxel-based morphometry and FSL FIRST. OND was significantly different between HC-MS (HC = 3.2 ± 0.4 mm, MS = 3 ± 0.4 mm; p < 0.019) and we found significant correlation between average OND and normalised whole brain (β = 0.42, p < 0.005), grey matter (β = 0.33, p < 0.035), white matter (β = 0.38, p < 0.012) and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid volume (β = - 0.36, p < 0.021) in the MS group. History of ON had no impact on the association between OND and volumetric data. In conclusion, OND is a promising surrogate marker in MS, that can be simply and reliably measured using TOS, and its derived measures correspond to brain volumetric measures. It should be further explored in larger and longitudinal studies.

A 10-Year Single-Center Study of the Clinical Characteristics of Optic Neuritis-Related NMOSD, MS, and Double Seronegative Optic Neuritis, Together with Factors Predicting Visual Outcomes

The clinical characteristics of three types of optic neuritis (double seronegative optic neuritis; DN-ON, Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis; NMOSD-ON, and multiple sclerosis-related optic neuritis; MS-ON) were examined in order to identify factors that may affect good visual recovery in Thai patients. The study included patients diagnosed with three types of optic neuritis at Rajavithi Hospital between 2011 and 2020. Visual acuity at the end of 12 months was used as the treatment outcome. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate potential predictors of good visual recovery. Of the 76 patients, 61 had optic neuritis, with DN-ON as the most common subtype (52.6%). MS-ON patients were significantly younger (28.3 ± 6.6 years, p = 0.002) and there was a female predominance in all subgroups (p = 0.076). NMOSD-ON patients had a significantly higher proportion of poor baseline VA (p < 0.001). None of the NMOSD-ON patients achieved 0.3 logMAR visual recovery in the 12-month period (p = 0.022). A delay in treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) for more than 7 days increased the risk of failure to gain 0.3 logMAR visual recovery by five times (OR 5.29, 95% CI 1.359–20.616, p = 0.016), with NMOSD-ON as the strongest predictor (OR 10.47, 95% CI; 1.095–99.993, p = 0.041). Early treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone may be important for achieving at least 0.3 logMAR visual recovery in Thai patients with optic neuritis.

Brain and Spinal Cord MRI Findings in Thai Multiple Sclerosis Patients

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated different MRI characteristics in Asian and Western patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the number of studies performed on Thai patients is still limited. Furthermore, these studies were conducted before the revision of the McDonald criteria in 2017.

METHODS

A retrospective descriptive study was performed on Thai patients diagnosed with MS, according to the McDonald criteria (2017), in a tertiary care hospital in Thailand.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included (twenty-seven female and five male patients). The mean age was 37.8 years. Most (28 patients) had relapsing remitting MS. Brain MRIs were available for all 32 patients, all of which showed abnormalities. The most common locations were the periventricular regions (78.1%), juxtacortical regions (75%) and deep white matter (62.5%). Dawson's fingers were identified in 20 patients (62.5%). Tumefactive MS was noted in two patients. Gadolinium-enhancing brain lesions were noted in nine patients (28.1%). Optic nerve lesions were found in seven patients. Six of the seven patients showed short segmental lesions with predominant posterior-half involvement. Spinal MRIs were available for 26 patients, with abnormalities detected in 23. Most (11 patients) had lesions both in the cervical and in the thoracic spinal cord. In total, 22 patients (95.7%) showed lesions at the periphery, most commonly at the lateral column. Fifteen patients showed lesions shorter than three vertebral segments (65.2%). Enhancing spinal lesions were noted in 14 patients. Dissemination in space was fulfilled in 31 patients (96.9%).

CONCLUSION

Some of the MRI findings in our study were similar to those of previous studies in Thailand and Asia, emphasizing the difference between Asian and Western MS.

Optic neuritis and autoimmune optic neuropathies: advances in diagnosis and treatment

Optic neuritis is an inflammatory optic neuropathy that is commonly indicative of autoimmune neurological disorders including multiple sclerosis, myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease, and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Early clinical recognition of optic neuritis is important in determining the potential aetiology, which has bearing on prognosis and treatment. Regaining high-contrast visual acuity is common in people with idiopathic optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis-associated optic neuritis; however, residual deficits in contrast sensitivity, binocular vision, and motion perception might impair vision-specific quality-of-life metrics. In contrast, recovery of visual acuity can be poorer and optic nerve atrophy more severe in individuals who are seropositive for antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, AQP4, and CRMP5 than in individuals with typical optic neuritis from idiopathic or multiple-sclerosis associated optic neuritis. Key clinical, imaging, and laboratory findings differentiate these disorders, allowing clinicians to focus their diagnostic studies and optimise acute and preventive treatments. Guided by early and accurate diagnosis of optic neuritis subtypes, the timely use of high-dose corticosteroids and, in some instances, plasmapheresis could prevent loss of high-contrast vision, improve contrast sensitivity, and preserve colour vision and visual fields. Advancements in our knowledge, diagnosis, and treatment of optic neuritis will ultimately improve our understanding of autoimmune neurological disorders, improve clinical trial design, and spearhead therapeutic innovation.

Should Aquaporin-4 Antibody Test Be Performed in all Patients With Isolated Optic Neuritis?

BACKGROUND

Optic neuritis (ON) may be the initial manifestation of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4 Ab) is used to diagnose NMOSD. This has implications on prognosis and is important for optimal management. We aim to evaluate if clinical features can distinguish AQP4 Ab seropositive and seronegative ON patients.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with first episode of isolated ON from Tan Tock Seng Hospital and Singapore National Eye Centre who tested for AQP4 Ab from 2008 to 2017. Demographic and clinical data were compared between seropositive and seronegative patients.

RESULTS

Among 106 patients (120 eyes) with first episode of isolated ON, 23 (26 eyes; 22%) were AQP4 Ab positive and 83 (94 eyes; 78%) were AQP4 Ab negative. At presentation, AQP4 Ab positive patients had older mean onset age (47.9 ± 13.6 vs 36.8 ± 12.6 years, P < 0.001), worse nadir VA (OR 1.714; 95% CI, 1.36 to 2.16; P < 0.001), less optic disc swelling (OR 5.04; 95% CI, 1.682 to 15.073; p = 0.004), and higher proportions of concomitant anti-Ro antibody (17% vs 4%, p = 0.038) and anti-La antibody (17% vs 1%, p = 0.008). More AQP4 Ab positive patients received steroid-sparing immunosuppressants (74% vs 19%, p < 0.001) and plasma exchange (13% vs 0%, p = 0.009). AQP4 Ab positive patients had worse mean logMAR VA (visual acuity) at 12 months (0.70 ± 0.3 vs 0.29 ± 0.5, p = 0.051) and 36 months (0.37±0.4 vs 0.14 ± 0.2, p = 0.048) follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Other than older onset age and retrobulbar optic neuritis, clinical features are non-discriminatory for NMOSD. We propose a low threshold for AQP4 Ab serology testing in inflammatory ON patients, particularly in high NMOSD prevalence populations, to minimize diagnostic and treatment delays.

Optic neuritis with potential for poor outcome

The Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial previously reported that corticosteroids accelerated visual recovery in optic neuritis (ON) without improving outcome. This finding related largely to multiple sclerosis (MS), and subsequently neurologists tended to await spontaneous recovery in ON. Since then, non-MS cases of ON have been identified with antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4) or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG). These disorders can closely mimic multiple sclerosis-associated or idiopathic demyelinating optic neuritis (MS/IDON) initially but risk a worse visual outcome. Scrutinising the clinical features and neuroimaging often enables differentiation between MS/IDON and other causes of ON. Early treatment with high-dose corticosteroids is an important determinant of visual outcome in non-MS/IDON. Prompt use of plasma exchange may also save sight. In this review, we contrast the presentations of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein associated optic neuritis (MOG-ON) and aquaporin 4 associated optic neuritis (AQP4-ON) with MS/IDON and provide an approach to acute management while awaiting results of antibody testing.

Fractional anisotropy helps to differentiate the optic nerve impairment between neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the characteristics of optic nerve impairment between neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) patients by fractional anisotropy (FA).

METHODS

Thirty-one NMOSD patients, 25 MS patients, and 17 heathy controls (HC) who underwent optic nerve DTI were included. The optic nerves of the NMOSD and MS patients were divided into vision-impaired (VI) subgroups and normal-appearing (NA) subgroups according to visual status, respectively. FA values were measured in the anterior, middle, and posterior segments of each intraorbital optic nerve.

RESULTS

FA values in VI NMOSD were significantly decreased in the whole optic nerve, especially the posterior segment of the optic nerve (p < 0.001). FA values measured in the anterior and middle segments of the optic nerve in VI MS were significantly decreased as compared to those in the HC (p < 0.05). Between NMOSD and MS, FA values in the posterior segment of the optic nerve showed significant differences (VI NMOSD vs. VI MS, 0.458 ± 0.097 vs. 0.568 ± 0.098, p < 0.001; NA NMOSD vs. NA MS, 0.568 ± 0.098 vs. 0.600 ± 0.085, p = 0.041, respectively). The signal intensity ratio (SIR) in the posterior segment of the optic nerve was significantly increased in VI NMOSD as compared with VI MS (p = 0.002). The combination of SIR and FA for distinguishing VI NMOSD from VI MS resulted in sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 86.49%, 80.00%, 88.9%, and 76.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

FA could quantify the characteristics of NMOSD- and MS-related optic nerve impairment. DTI was a simple and effective imaging tool to differentiate between the two.

KEY POINTS

• NMOSD-related optic nerve impairment is extensive, often greater than half of the optic nerve, with the most significant involvement of the posterior segment of the optic nerve. • MS-related optic nerve impairment is more limited than NMOSD, and anterior and middle optic nerve involvement is common. • Optic nerve DTI is a convenient and effective imaging tool that can help characterize NMOSD and MS.

Acute optic neuritis: What do complementary tests add to diagnosis?

INTRODUCTION

Optic neuritis (ON) is the inflammation of the optic nerve due in many cases, to a pathological immune response. Since its symptoms can be subtle, diagnosis is sometimes challenging. The value of complementary tests for diagnosis and prognosis of ON was demonstrated in retrospective analysis, but their utility in the acute period of ON has been scarcely studied. The aim of this study is to determine the usefulness of clinical assessment, optical coherence tomography (OCT), visual evoked potentials (VEP) and orbit magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for making diagnosis and prognosis of acute ON (AON).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted including patients with ON within 90 days of symptom onset. A complete neuro-ophthalmological evaluation, OCT, VEP and MRI were carried out, determining in each case its sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in the diagnosis of ON and the assessment of its severity.

RESULTS

75 eyes of 34 patients with ON were included. Regarding diagnosis, low contrast visual acuity (LCVA) displayed the highest sensitivity (100%), being superior than the sensitivity of all complementary tools, always below 80%. Orbit MRI abnormal findings has a Specificity of 100% to confirm diagnosis. Regarding severity assessment and prognosis, Ganglion cell +inner plexiform layer (GCIP) thickness, but not retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL), correlates significantly with patients' visual acuity (VA) (p < 0.05). Furthermore, both P100latency and VEP's amplitude showed to be significantly associated with VA (p < 0.05) in the acute period. The combination of two predictors (measurement of RNFL and GCIP) are capable of explaining 60% of the variation of the patient's visual acuity, with statistical significance (p = 0.02) CONCLUSIONS: In depth neuro-ophthalmological assessment during the acute phase of ON, including contrast sensitivity measurement, proved to be superior to complementary tests for diagnosis, surpassing the performance of OCT and VEP. However, these tools can add to prognosis, as GCIP thickness and VEP's amplitude correlate with disease severity and its findings could encourage prompt aggressive treatments in AON.

Pediatric Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: Case Series and Literature Review

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) is a central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory demyelinating disease characterized by recurrent inflammatory events that primarily involve optic nerves and the spinal cord, but also affect other regions of the CNS, including hypothalamus, area postrema and periaqueductal gray matter. The aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-IgG) is specific for NMOSD. Recently, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-IgG) have been found in a group of AQP4-IgG negative patients. NMOSD is rare among children and adolescents, but early diagnosis is important to start adequate therapy. In this report, we present cases of seven pediatric patients with NMOSD and we review the clinical and neuroimaging characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of NMOSD in children.

Differences in the involved sites among different types of demyelinating optic neuritis in traditional MRI examination: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a significant role in assessing optic neuropathy and providing more detailed information about the lesion of the visual pathway to help differentiate optic neuritis from other visual disorders. This study aims to systematically review the literature and verify if there is a real difference in lesion location among different demyelinating optic neuritis (DON) subtypes.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted including 8 electronic databases and related resources from the establishment of the database to August 25th, 2020. We classified DON into 5 subtypes and divided the visual pathways into five segments mainly comparing the differences in the involved visual pathway sites of different subtypes.

Results

Fifty-five studies were included in the analysis, and the abnormal rate was as high as 92% during the acute phase (within 4 weeks of symptom onset). With respect to lesion location, the orbital segment of the optic nerve was the most frequently involved (87%), whereas optic tract involvement was very rare. Involvement of the orbital segment was more common in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-related optic neuritis (MOG-ON) (78%) and chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION) (81%), while the lesion was found to be located more posteriorly in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis (NMOSD-ON). With respect to lesion length, approximately 77% of MOG-ON patients had lesions involving more than half of the optic nerve length.

Conclusions

MRI examination is recommended for DON patients in the acute phase. In MOG-ON, anterior involvement is more common and the involved length is mostly more than 1/2 of the optic nerve length, whereas posterior involvement, intracranial segment, optic chiasm, or optic tract, is more common in NMOSD-ON.

Prospero registration number

CRD42020222430 (25-11-2020).

MRI Patterns Distinguish AQP4 Antibody Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder From Multiple Sclerosis

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) are inflammatory diseases of the CNS. Overlap in the clinical and MRI features of NMOSD and MS means that distinguishing these conditions can be difficult. With the aim of evaluating the diagnostic utility of MRI features in distinguishing NMOSD from MS, we have conducted a cross-sectional analysis of imaging data and developed predictive models to distinguish the two conditions. NMOSD and MS MRI lesions were identified and defined through a literature search. Aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody positive NMOSD cases and age- and sex-matched MS cases were collected. MRI of orbits, brain and spine were reported by at least two blinded reviewers. MRI brain or spine was available for 166/168 (99%) of cases. Longitudinally extensive (OR = 203), "bright spotty" (OR = 93.8), whole (axial; OR = 57.8) or gadolinium (Gd) enhancing (OR = 28.6) spinal cord lesions, bilateral (OR = 31.3) or Gd-enhancing (OR = 15.4) optic nerve lesions, and nucleus tractus solitarius (OR = 19.2), periaqueductal (OR = 16.8) or hypothalamic (OR = 7.2) brain lesions were associated with NMOSD. Ovoid (OR = 0.029), Dawson's fingers (OR = 0.031), pyramidal corpus callosum (OR = 0.058), periventricular (OR = 0.136), temporal lobe (OR = 0.137) and T1 black holes (OR = 0.154) brain lesions were associated with MS. A score-based algorithm and a decision tree determined by machine learning accurately predicted more than 85% of both diagnoses using first available imaging alone. We have confirmed NMOSD and MS specific MRI features and combined these in predictive models that can accurately identify more than 85% of cases as either AQP4 seropositive NMOSD or MS.

Retinal optical coherence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and MOG-antibody associated disorders: an updated review

INTRODUCTION

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein IgG antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD) comprise two groups of rare neuroinflammatory diseases that cause attack-related damage to the central nervous system (CNS). Clinical attacks are often characterized by optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, and to a lesser extent, brainstem encephalitis/area postrema syndrome. Retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive technique that allows for in vivo thickness quantification of the retinal layers. Apart from OCT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an increasingly important role in NMOSD and MOGAD diagnosis based on the current international diagnostic criteria. Retinal OCT and brain/spinal cord/optic nerve MRI can help to distinguish NMOSD and MOGAD from other neuroinflammatory diseases, particularly from multiple sclerosis, and to monitor disease-associated CNS-damage.

AREAS COVERED

This article summarizes the current status of imaging research in NMOSD and MOGAD, and reviews the clinical relevance of OCT, MRI and other relevant imaging techniques for differential diagnosis, screening and monitoring of the disease course.

EXPERT OPINION

Retinal OCT and MRI can visualize and quantify CNS damage in vivo, improving our understanding of NMOSD and MOGAD pathology. Further efforts on the standardization of these imaging techniques are essential for implementation into clinical practice and as outcome parameters in clinical trials.

At this Junction…

An 81-year-old woman developed painful vision loss to hand motions in the right eye over a several-day period. Dilated fundus examination revealed no acute pathology, but automated perimetry showed a superotemporal visual field defect in the asymptomatic left eye, suggestive of a junctional scotoma. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated enhancement of the right optic nerve extending to its junction with the optic chiasm. The patient's vision failed to improve with intravenous corticosteroids, but demonstrated significant improvement with therapeutic plasma exchange. She was subsequently found to be seropositive for aquaporin-4 autoantibodies, confirming the diagnosis of neuromyelitis optic spectrum disorder.

Magnetic resonance imaging in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) associated with antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4), which has distinct clinical, radiological and pathological features, but also has some overlap with multiple sclerosis and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody associated disease. Early recognition of NMOSD is important because of differing responses to both acute and preventive therapy. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has proved essential in this process. Key MR imaging clues to the diagnosis of NMOSD are longitudinally extensive lesions of the optic nerve (more than half the length) and spinal cord (three or more vertebral segments), bilateral optic nerve lesions and lesions of the optic chiasm, area postrema, floor of the IV ventricle, periaqueductal grey matter, hypothalamus and walls of the III ventricle. Other NMOSD-specific lesions are denoted by their unique morphology: heterogeneous lesions of the corpus callosum, 'cloud-like' gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing white matter lesions and 'bright spotty' lesions of the spinal cord. Other lesions described in NMOSD, including linear periventricular peri-ependymal lesions and patch subcortical white matter lesions, may be less specific. The use of advanced MR imaging techniques is yielding further useful information regarding focal degeneration of the thalamus and optic radiation in NMOSD and suggests that paramagnetic rim patterns and changes in normal appearing white matter are specific to MS. MR imaging is crucial in the early recognition of NMOSD and in directing testing for AQP4 antibodies and guiding immediate acute treatment decisions. Increasingly, MR imaging is playing a role in diagnosing seronegative cases of NMOSD.

Current understanding of the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of optic neuritis

Optic neuritis is an ocular disorder whose pathogenesis has not been fully determined, although autoimmune mechanisms have been suggested to be involved in its development. In recent years, anti-aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-Ab) and anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG-Ab) have been shown to play major roles in the development of optic neuritis. Because these two antibodies target different tissues, optic neuritis can be classified by the type of antibody. AQP4-Ab-positive optic neuritis responds poorly to steroid therapy and has a poor prognosis in terms of visual acuity. On the other hand, MOG-Ab-positive optic neuritis responds favorably to steroid therapy but is likely to recur when the dosage of steroids is reduced or discontinued. We first present the high incidence of idiopathic optic neuritis and discuss these relatively newer disease concepts of AQP4-Ab-positive optic neuritis and MOG-Ab-positive optic neuritis.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein associated disorder-optic neuritis: a comprehensive review of diagnosis and treatment

Optic neuritis (ON) is the most common cause of acute optic neuropathy in patients younger than 50 years of age and is most frequently idiopathic or associated with multiple sclerosis. However, the discovery of aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (IgG) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG as biomarkers for two separate central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating diseases has revealed that neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMSOD) and MOG-IgG-associated disease (MOGAD) are responsible for clinically distinct subsets of ON. NMOSD-ON and MOGAD-ON both demonstrate tendencies for bilateral optic nerve involvement and often exhibit a relapsing course with the potential for devastating long-term visual outcomes. Early and accurate diagnosis is therefore essential. This review will summarize the current understanding of the clinical spectra of NMOSD and MOGAD, the radiographic and serological findings which support their diagnoses, and the current evidence behind various acute and long-term therapeutic strategies for ON related to these conditions. A particular emphasis is placed on a number of recent multi-centre randomized placebo-controlled trials, which provide the first level I evidence for long-term treatment of NMOSD.

MRI Characteristics of NMO, MOG and MS Related Optic Neuritis

Acute isolated optic neuritis can be the initial presentation of demyelinating inflammatory central nervous system disease related to multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOG-AD). In addition to the well-characterized brain and spinal cord imaging features, important and characteristic differences in the radiologic appearance of the optic nerves in these disorders are being described, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the optic nerves is becoming an essential tool in the differential diagnosis of optic neuritis. Whereas typical demyelinating optic neuritis is a relatively mild and self-limited disease, atypical optic neuritis in NMO and MOG-AD is potentially much more vision-threatening and merits a different treatment approach. Thus, differentiation based on MRI features may be particularly important during the first attack of optic neuritis, when antibody status is not yet known. This review discusses the optic nerve imaging in the major demyelinating disorders with an emphasis on clinically relevant differences that can help clinicians assess and manage these important neuro-ophthalmic disorders. It also reviews the utility of optic nerve MRI as a prognostic indicator in acute optic neuritis.

Optical Coherence Tomography in Neuromyelitis Optica spectrum disorder and Multiple Sclerosis: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify and compare the characteristics of retinal nerve layers using spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and healthy controls (HCs).

METHODS

It is a cross-sectional population-based study in Isfahan, Iran. We enrolled 98 participants including 45 NMOSD patients (90 eyes), 35 RRMS patients (70 eyes) and 18 HCs (36 eyes). Evaluation criteria were thickness of different sectors in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and intra-retinal layers around the macula. History of previous optic neuritis (ON) was obtained through chart review and medical record.

RESULTS

Without considering ON, total macular, ganglion cell layer (GCL) and pRNFL were significantly thinner in both groups of patients compared to HCs. On macular examination, GCL and total macular thickness were significantly thinner than HCs in all NMOSD and RRMS eyes with and without history of ON. While there was no significant difference between MS-ON and MS without a history of ON in the macular measures, the reduction in total macular and GCL thickness was significantly greater in NMOSD-ON compared to NMOSD without a history of ON. Also in NMOSD-ON eyes, the RNFL, GCL, IPL and GCIPL layers were significantly thinner than that of MS-ON. On the other hand, the pRNFL study showed significant thinning of all quadrants in the RRMS and NMOSD groups relative to HCs. While the decrease of pRNFL thickness in the eyes of NMOSD-ON and MS with and without a previous history of ON was significantly greater than that of HCs, no difference was observed between NMOSD without ON and HCs. In addition, in NMOSD patients, pRNFL was significantly thinner in eyes with history of ON compared to non ON-eyes. Furthermore, in patients with a history of ON, reduction in all sectors of pRNFl (except in T) was significantly greater in NMOSD compared to MS patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that although macular and retinal damage occurred in both NMOSD and RRMS patients without significant differences, the severity of injury in eyes with history of ON was significantly higher in NMOSD compared to MS patients, that could be considered as a marker to distinguish them. In addition, our results confirmed the absence of subclinical optic nerve involvement in NMOSD unlike MS patients.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

The disease concept of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders(NMOSD) has undergone a significant change over the last two decades including the detection of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein(MOG) antibody in patients who are seronegative for aquaporin-4 antibody. Aquaporin-4 antibody positive NMOSD is now regarded as an immune astrocytopathy. Conversely, MOG antibody associated disease is known to target myelin rather than astrocytes, leading to an NMOSD syndrome with distinct clinical and radiological features. Incorporation of clinical features like area postrema syndrome, brainstem syndrome, diencephalic syndrome and cortical manifestations as core clinical characteristics into the revised diagnostic criteria has widened the clinical spectrum of NMOSD. With the development of these criteria, it is possible to make the diagnosis at an earlier stage so that effective immunosuppression can be instituted promptly for a better long-term prognosis. Newer therapeutic agents have been introduced for aquaporin-4 seropositive NMOSD disease; however, challenges remain in treating seronegative disease because of limited treatment options.

Etiologies of Acute Optic Neuritis in Thailand: An Observational Study of 171 Patients

Purpose

To analyze the demographic patterns, clinical characteristics and etiologies of acute optic neuritis (ON).

Methods

This retrospective observational study included patients with acute ON who presented to a university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, between January 2010 and March 2020. The demographic details, clinical characteristics and etiologies of acute ON were evaluated.

Results

A total of 171 patients were included in the study (78.4% [n=134] female; mean age 45 years [standard deviation 15.4 years]; 32.2% [n=55] bilateral involvement). The most common type of acute ON was idiopathic (51.5%), followed by neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD, 30.9%), other autoimmune disorders (9.9%), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disorder (MOGAD, 5.3%), multiple sclerosis (MS, 1.8%), and postinfection (0.6%). In the other autoimmune disorders group, 2 patients developed systemic lupus erythematosus (1.2%), 2 Sjogren’s syndrome (1.2%), 1 RA (0.6%), 1 anti-NMDAR (0.6%), 3 anti-Jo1 (1.8%), 2 c-ANCA (1.2%), 1 anti-centromere (0.6%), and 5 nonspecific autoimmune disorders (2.9%). In the idiopathic group, 38.6% developed single isolated ON, 1.8% relapsing isolated ON and 11.1% chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy.

Conclusion

The most common form of acute ON in this study, similar to other Asian countries, was idiopathic. Idiopathic-ON shared some phenotypes with NMOSD and MOGAD. We also reported patients with anti-NMDAR, anti-Jo1, c-ANCA and anti-centromere disorders. Improvements in antibody detection have widened the range of possible etiologies of acute ON. The study highlighted the important role of antibodies in creating effective treatments in the future.

Rapid Administration of High-Dose Intravenous Methylprednisolone Improves Visual Outcomes After Optic Neuritis in Patients With AQP4-IgG-Positive NMOSD

Objective: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the rapid impact of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy (1,000 mg/day for 3 days) on the eventual visual prognosis in patients with serum anti-aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG)–positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs) who had an attack of optic neuritis (ON).

Methods: Data from 32 consecutive NMOSD patients (1 male and 31 female) with at least one ON attack, involving a total of 36 ON-involved eyes, were evaluated. The following variables at ON onset were evaluated: sex, age at the first ON episode, visual acuity at nadir, visual acuity after 1 year, duration from ON onset to treatment for an acute ON attack, cycles of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy for the ON attack, and cycles of plasmapheresis for the ON attack. Among the 36 ON-involved eyes, 27 eyes were studied using orbital MRI with a short-T1 inversion recovery sequence and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1 imaging before starting treatment in the acute phase.

Results: In univariate analyses, a shorter duration from ON onset to the initiation of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy favorably affected the eventual visual prognosis 1 year later (Spearman's rho = 0.50, p = 0.0018). The lesion length on orbital MRI was also correlated with the eventual visual prognosis (rho = 0.68, p < 0.0001). Meanwhile, the days to steroid pulse therapy and lesion length on orbital MRI did not show a significant correlation. These findings suggest that the rapidness of steroid pulse therapy administration affects the eventual visual prognosis independent of the severity of ON. In multivariate analysis, a shorter time from ON onset to the start of acute treatment (p = 0.0004) and a younger age at onset (p = 0.0071) were significantly associated with better visual outcomes.

Conclusions: Rapid initiation of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy is essential to preserve the eventual visual acuity in patients with serum AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD. Once clinicians suspect acute ON with serum AQP4-IgG, swift administration of steroid pulse therapy before confirming the positivity of serum AQP4-IgG would be beneficial for preserving visual function.

Radiological characteristics of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in Kuwait

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system that predominantly targets optic nerves and spinal cord. Studies of NMOSD are scarce in the Middle East.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the MRI characteristics of NMOSD patients in Kuwait.

PATIENT AND METHODS

This is an observational, retrospective study on NMOSD patients who attended the MS clinic. Patients who fulfilled the 2015 diagnostic criteria of NMOSD were included. Patients` clinical, radiological and serological data were extracted from the medical records. The radiological variables were compared according to gender and AQP4 serostatus.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients fulfilling the NMOSD diagnostic criteria. The mean age and mean age of onset were 32.6 ± 11.4 and 28.9 ± 9.8 years respectively. Females represented 83.3 % of the cohort with female-to-male ratio of 5:1. Thirty-one patients (73.8 %) tested positive for AQP4 antibody. Nineteen patients (45.2 %) had bilateral optic nerve involvement, while chiasmal involvement was seen in 8 (19.0 %) patients. Spinal cord was involved in 36 (85.7 %) patients; of whom 27 (64.3 %) had LETM. The most common spinal segment involved was the cervical (72.2 %) followed by the dorsal (25.0 %) regions. The brain was involved in 39 (92.8 %) patients and the periventricular region around fourth and lateral ventricles was the most commonly involved site (n = 35; 83.3 %), along with periaqueductal (n = 25; 61.9 %) and corpus callosal (n = 24; 57.1 %) regions. Isolated area postrema involvement was observed in 9 (21.4 %) patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study describing the radiological characteristics of NMOSD in Kuwait. Although our data is comparable with the previous international studies, a higher percentage of bilateral optic nerve, brain, and callosal involvement was observed. Further multicenter studies with a larger cohort are needed to confirm our results.

Visualizing the Central Nervous System: Imaging Tools for Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are autoimmune central nervous system conditions with increasing incidence and prevalence. While MS is the most frequent inflammatory CNS disorder in young adults, NMOSD is a rare disease, that is pathogenetically distinct from MS, and accounts for approximately 1% of demyelinating disorders, with the relative proportion within the demyelinating CNS diseases varying widely among different races and regions. Most immunomodulatory drugs used in MS are inefficacious or even harmful in NMOSD, emphasizing the need for a timely and accurate diagnosis and distinction from MS. Despite distinct immunopathology and differences in disease course and severity there might be considerable overlap in clinical and imaging findings, posing a diagnostic challenge for managing neurologists. Differential diagnosis is facilitated by positive serology for AQP4-antibodies (AQP4-ab) in NMOSD, but might be difficult in seronegative cases. Imaging of the brain, optic nerve, retina and spinal cord is of paramount importance when managing patients with autoimmune CNS conditions. Once a diagnosis has been established, imaging techniques are often deployed at regular intervals over the disease course as surrogate measures for disease activity and progression and to surveil treatment effects. While the application of some imaging modalities for monitoring of disease course was established decades ago in MS, the situation is unclear in NMOSD where work on longitudinal imaging findings and their association with clinical disability is scant. Moreover, as long-term disability is mostly attack-related in NMOSD and does not stem from insidious progression as in MS, regular follow-up imaging might not be useful in the absence of clinical events. However, with accumulating evidence for covert tissue alteration in NMOSD and with the advent of approved immunotherapies the role of imaging in the management of NMOSD may be reconsidered. By contrast, MS management still faces the challenge of implementing imaging techniques that are capable of monitoring progressive tissue loss in clinical trials and cohort studies into treatment algorithms for individual patients. This article reviews the current status of imaging research in MS and NMOSD with an emphasis on emerging modalities that have the potential to be implemented in clinical practice.

Magnetic resonance imaging of intraocular optic nerve disorders: review article

The optic nerve is morphologically classified as a peripheral nerve, but histologically it shares characteristics with the central nerves. Diseases that affect vision and the optic nerve are many and varied: optic neuritis, demyelination (multiple sclerosis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-related disorders), drugs, collagen disease, vasculitis, infection, trauma, vascular abnormalities, tumours, and non-tumoural masses. In this review, we summarise the magnetic resonance imaging findings for various pathological conditions that cause deterioration in visual acuity.

Acute Management of Optic Neuritis: An Evolving Paradigm

The current management of acute optic neuritis (ON) is focused on expediting visual recovery through the use of high-dose intravenous corticosteroids. The recent identification of specific autoantibodies associated with central nervous system inflammatory disorders has provided novel insights into immune targets and mechanisms that impact the prognosis, treatment, and recurrence of ON. Therefore, neurologists and ophthalmologists need to be aware of clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings that may provide important clues to the etiology of ON and the potential need for aggressive management. Moving forward, rapid and accurate diagnosis of inflammatory ON will likely be critical for implementing clinical care that optimizes short-term and long-term therapeutic outcomes.

Optic Neuritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses the clinical presentation, evaluation, and management of the patient with optic neuritis. Initial emphasis is placed on clinical history, examination, diagnostic testing, and medical decision making, while subsequent focus is placed on examining specific inflammatory optic neuropathies. Clinical clues, examination findings, neuroimaging, and laboratory testing that differentiate autoimmune, granulomatous, demyelinating, infectious, and paraneoplastic causes of optic neuritis are assessed, and current treatments are evaluated.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in technology and immunology have enhanced our understanding of the pathologies driving inflammatory optic nerve injury. Clinicians are now able to interrogate optic nerve structure and function during inflammatory injury, rapidly identify disease-relevant autoimmune targets, and deliver timely therapeutics to improve visual outcomes.

SUMMARY

Optic neuritis is a common clinical manifestation of central nervous system inflammation. Depending on the etiology, visual prognosis and the risk for recurrent injury may vary. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of optic neuritis may be critical for limiting vision loss, future neurologic disability, and organ damage. This article will aid neurologists in formulating a systematic approach to patients with optic neuritis.

MRI differences between MOG antibody disease and AQP4 NMOSD

BACKGROUND

MOG antibody and AQP4 antibody seropositive diseases are immunologically distinct subtypes of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) with similar clinical presentations. MRI findings can be instrumental in distinguishing MOG antibody disease from AQP4 antibody NMOSD.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to characterize the neuroradiological differences between MOG antibody disease and AQP4 antibody NMOSD with the aim to distinguish between the two entities.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 26 MOG and 25 AQP4 seropositive patients in which MRI features of the brain, spinal cord, and orbit were compared.

RESULTS

The majority of the abnormal findings in the MOG cohort were located on orbital MRIs, while spinal cord magnetic resonance (MR) abnormalities were more common in the AQP4 cohort. Brain abnormalities showed some overlap, but cortical gray/juxtacortical white matter involvement was distinct to MOG patients, while area postrema involvement was a rare feature.

CONCLUSION

Cortical gray/juxtacortical white matter lesions on brain MRI might help distinguish MOG antibody disease from AQP4-positive NMOSD. These findings could be of value in distinguishing the two entities as early as the first presentation.

Pediatric NMOSD: A Review and Position Statement on Approach to Work-Up and Diagnosis

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) primarily affecting the optic nerves and spinal cord, but also involving other regions of the CNS including the area postrema, periaqueductal gray matter, and hypothalamus. Knowledge related to pediatric manifestations of NMOSD has grown in recent years, particularly in light of newer information regarding the importance of not only antibodies to aquaporin 4 (AQP4-IgG) but also myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) in children manifesting clinically with this syndrome. In this review, we describe the current state of the knowledge related to clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and chronic therapies for children with NMOSD, with emphasis on literature that has been published in the last 5 years. Following the review, we propose recommendations for the assessment/follow up clinical care, and treatment of this population.

[MOG encephalomyelitis: international recommendations on diagnosis and antibody testing]

Over the past few years, new-generation cell-based assays have demonstrated a robust association of autoantibodies to full-length human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) with (mostly recurrent) optic neuritis, myelitis and brainstem encephalitis, as well as with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like presentations. Most experts now consider MOG-IgG-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM) a disease entity in its own right, immunopathogenetically distinct from both classic multiple sclerosis (MS) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Owing to a substantial overlap in clinicoradiological presentation, MOG-EM was often unwittingly misdiagnosed as MS in the past. Accordingly, increasing numbers of patients with suspected or established MS are currently being tested for MOG-IgG. However, screening of large unselected cohorts for rare biomarkers can significantly reduce the positive predictive value of a test. To lessen the hazard of overdiagnosing MOG-EM, which may lead to inappropriate treatment, more selective criteria for MOG-IgG testing are urgently needed. In this paper, we propose indications for MOG-IgG testing based on expert consensus. In addition, we give a list of conditions atypical for MOG-EM ("red flags") that should prompt physicians to challenge a positive MOG-IgG test result. Finally, we provide recommendations regarding assay methodology, specimen sampling and data interpretation, and propose for the first time diagnostic criteria for MOG-EM.

Epidemiologic and Clinical Characteristics of Optic Neuritis in Japan

PURPOSE

To elucidate the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of optic neuritis in Japan.

DESIGN

Multicenter cross-sectional, observational cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 531 cases of unilateral or bilateral noninfectious optic neuritis identified in 33 institutions nationwide in Japan.

METHODS

Serum samples from patients with optic neuritis were tested for anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQP4-Abs) and anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Abs) using a cell-based assay and were correlated with the clinical findings.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Antibody positivity, clinical and radiologic characteristics, and visual outcome.

RESULTS

Among 531 cases of optic neuritis, 12% were AQP4-Ab positive, 10% were MOG-Ab positive, 77% were negative for both antibodies (double-negative), and 1 case was positive for both antibodies. Pretreatment visual acuity (VA) worsened to more than a median 1.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in all groups. After steroid pulse therapy (combined with plasmapheresis in 32% of patients in AQP4-Ab-positive group), median VA improved to 0.4 logMAR in the AQP4-Ab-positive group, 0 logMAR in the MOG-Ab-positive group, and 0.1 logMAR in the double-negative group. The AQP4-Ab-positive group showed a high proportion of females, exhibited diverse visual field abnormalities, and demonstrated concurrent spinal cord lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 22% of the patients. In the MOG-Ab-positive group, although posttreatment visual outcome was good, the rates of optic disc swelling and pain with eye movement were significantly higher than those in the AQP4-Ab-positive and double-negative groups. However, most cases showed isolated optic neuritis lesions on MRI. In the double-negative group, 4% of the patients had multiple sclerosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of all participants identified age and presence of antibodies (MOG-Ab and AQP4-Ab) as significant factors affecting visual outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The present large-scale cohort study revealed the clinicoepidemiologic features of noninfectious optic neuritis in Japan. Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive optic neuritis has poor visual outcome. In contrast, MOG-Ab positive cases manifested severe clinical findings of optic neuritis before treatment, but few showed concurrent lesions in sites other than the optic nerve and generally showed good treatment response with favorable visual outcome. These findings indicate that autoantibody measurement is useful for prompt diagnosis and proper management of optic neuritis that tends to become refractory.

Radiological characteristics of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease

BACKGROUND

MOG antibody disease is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by the presence of a serological antibody against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG). MRI is instrumental in distinguishing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) from multiple sclerosis (MS), but MRI features of MOG disease appear to overlap with NMOSD and MS.

OBJECTIVES

In this study we aim to characterize the radiological features of MOG antibody disease and compare the findings with those previously described.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 26 MOG positive patients. We aim to describe their brain, spinal and orbital MRI features and compare our findings with those previously reported in the literature.

RESULTS

The majority of the abnormal findings was located on orbital MRIs, with more involvement of the anterior structures and bilateral involvement of the optic nerves. Brain abnormalities were distinct from both NMOSD and MS lesions. Spinal cord was the least affected.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a dedicated radiological study aiming to characterize the features of MOG antibody disease which might aid in the proper investigation of cases presenting with acquired demyelinating disorders.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: Features of aquaporin-4, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and double-seronegative-mediated subtypes

The new diagnostic classification of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) in 2015 highlights the central role of biomarkers, such as antibodies against aquaporin-4 (AQP4-Ab), in diagnosis. Also, in approximately 20-25% of patients without AQP4-Ab (NMOSD^AQP4-) the presence of an antibody directed against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) characterizes a specific population of NMOSD patients (NMOSD^MOG+), according to their demographic and clinical data and prognoses. While double-seronegative cases (NMOSD^NEG) have not been fully described, they may correspond to the very first patients with opticospinal demyelination reported by Devic and Gault in 1894. The present report reviews the current knowledge of the pathophysiology and clinical features of NMOSD^AQP4+, NMOSD^MOG+ and NMOSD^NEG patients, and also discusses the relationship between the extended spectrum of MOG disease and NMOSD^MOG+. Finally, the current treatments for acute relapses and relapse prevention are described, with a focus on serological-based therapeutic responses and the promising new therapeutic targets.