Outcomes of middle fossa craniotomy for the repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence

Symptomatology in Unilateral Versus Bilateral Superior Canal Dehiscence Patients Undergoing Unilateral Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To compare symptomatology in patients with unilateral versus bilateral superior semicircular canal dehiscence who underwent unilateral surgical repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single surgeon series at tertiary academic medical center from 2002 to 2021.

METHODS

Patients were administered a standardized questionnaire regarding the presence or absence of 16 symptoms (11 auditory and 8 vestibular) pre- and postoperatively. Symptom rates were compared between patients with unilateral and bilateral dehiscence, and paired statistical testing was used to analyze symptom improvement with surgery.

RESULTS

Our final cohort included 125 patients, 93 (74%) with unilateral superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) and 32 (26%) with bilateral SCDS. Bilateral patients had an increased burden of auditory and vestibular symptoms compared to unilateral patients before surgery (7.6 vs 6.2, P = .03) and after surgery (3.1 vs 1.9, P = .02). Both groups experienced a significant reduction of symptoms following repair (P < .01 for both).

CONCLUSION

Our study has 2 key findings: First, patients with bilateral dehiscence seem to be more symptomatic, reporting more auditory and vestibular symptoms both before and after surgery. Second, bilateral patients still seem to benefit from unilateral repair, demonstrating a significant reduction in the number of symptoms with surgery. Our findings may help inform the management of the sizable proportion of SCDS patients with bilateral defects.

Unveiling the importance of the endoscope in the sealing of the superior canal dehiscence syndrome, how we do it

The superior canal dehiscence syndrome is a pathology that affects the arcuate eminence creating a "third window" between the inner ear and the middle fossa. This condition can lead to symptoms such as hearing loss, autophony, or sound-induced vertigo. Traditionally, surgical treatment has been performed by microscope-assisted temporal craniotomy, but when the dehiscence is in the medial part of the arcuate eminence the bone defect may not be seen. We present case series treated at our institution diagnosed of superior canal dehiscence syndrome involving the medial slope of the arcuate eminence. During surgery, the bone defect could not be visible with traditional microscopic techniques. Nonetheless, by introducing the endoscope with the 0º and 30º optics, the dehiscence could be clearly observed and treated correctly. Our results show a clinical improvement without side effects or complications in the patients undergoing this technique. Endoscope-assisted surgery is a safe procedure and provides a better visualization of medial defects.

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence postoperative outcomes: a case series of 350 repairs

BACKGROUND

Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence (SSCD) is a dehiscence of the otic capsule which normally lies over the superior semicircular canal. This database constitutes the largest series of SSCD patients to date.

OBJECTIVE

To determine what preoperative factors, if any, contribute to postoperative outcomes and evaluate symptom resolution in a large SSCD patient cohort.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective chart review collected patient demographics, intraoperative findings, and pre-and postoperative symptoms. Fisher's exact t-test was performed for unpaired categorical variables, with a significance level of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

350 SSCD repairs were performed. The median age was 52 years (range: 17-86 years, ± 6.4 years), and the median follow-up duration was 4.6 months (range: 0.03-59.5 months, ± 6.8 months). Preoperative hearing loss was significantly associated with female sex (p = 0.0028). The most reported preoperative symptoms were tinnitus (77.4%), dizziness (74.0%), autophony (66.3%), amplification (63.7%), and disequilibrium (62.6%). Between patients who received unilateral versus bilateral SSCD repair, the greatest postoperative symptomatic resolution was seen in autophony (74.9%, p < 0.001), amplification (77.3%, p = 0.00027), hyperacusis (77.4%, p = 0.023), hearing (62.9%, p = 0.0063), and dizziness (54.6%, p < 0.001) for patients with unilateral SSCD repair.

CONCLUSION

Surgical repair via the middle cranial fossa approach can significantly resolve auditory, vestibular, and neurological symptoms of patients with SSCD. Although this is one of the largest single-institution SSCD studies to date, future multi-institutional, prospective studies would be beneficial to validate these results.

Predictors of non-primary auditory and vestibular symptom persistence following surgical repair of superior canal dehiscence syndrome

Objective

Patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) can present with a plethora of auditory and/or vestibular symptoms associated with a bony defect of the superior semicircular canal. While surgical repair is a reasonable option for patients with significant localizing symptoms, the degree of clinical improvement will vary among patients and poses challenges in outcome prediction. This study aims to assess the relationship between preoperative and postoperative symptoms and identify predictors of symptom persistence following repair.

Study design

Retrospective chart review.

Setting

Tertiary neurotology single-institution care center.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was to determine the proportion of resolved and persistent primary (most bothersome) and non-primary audiologic and vestibular symptoms following SCD repair. Secondary outcomes included comparison of patient, operative and radiologic characteristics between patients with resolved vs. persistent symptoms. Standardized patient questionnaires including 11 auditory and 8 vestibular symptoms were administered to patients at their preoperative and follow-up visits. Patient pre- vs. postoperative survey results, demographic and clinical characteristics, operative characteristics, audiometric data and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds were compared via univariate χ2 and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses between those patients reporting full postoperative resolution of symptoms and persistence of one or more symptoms. Radiologic computed tomography (CT) measurements of superior canal dehiscence (SCD) defect size, location, and laterality were also compared between these two groups.

Results

Of 126 patients (132 ears) included in our study, 119 patients (90.2%) reported postoperative resolution (n = 82, 62.1%) or improvement (n = 37, 28.0%) of primary (most bothersome) symptoms, while 13 patients (9.8%) reported persistence of primary symptoms. The median (interquartile range) and range between surgery and questionnaire completion were 9 (4-28), 1-124 months, respectively. Analyzing all symptoms (primary and non-primary) 69 (52.3%) and 68 (51.1%) patients reported complete postoperative auditory and vestibular symptom resolution, respectively. The most likely persistent symptoms included imbalance (33/65/67, 50.8%), positional dizziness (7/20, 35.0%) and oscillopsia (44/15, 26.7%). Factors associated with persistent auditory symptoms included history of seizures (0% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.023), auditory chief complaint (50.0% vs. 70.5%), higher PTA (mean 19.6 vs. 25.1 dB, p = 0.043) and higher cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds at 1000 Hz (mean 66.5 vs. 71.4, p = 0.033). A migraine diagnosis (14.0% vs. 41.9% p < 0.010), bilateral radiologic SCD (17.5% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.034) and revision cases (0.0% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.002) were associated with persistent vestibular symptoms. Neither SCD defect size nor location were significantly associated with symptom persistence (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Surgical repair for SCDS offers meaningful reduction in the majority of auditory and vestibular symptoms. However, the persistence of certain, mostly non-primary, symptoms and the identification of potential associated factors including migraines, PTA thresholds, cVEMP threshold, bilateral SCD, and revision cases emphasize the importance of individualized patient counseling and management strategies.

Auditory and Vestibular Symptom Improvement With Surgery for Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

(1) To measure the change in auditory and vestibular symptoms following superior canal dehiscence (SCD) surgery, and (2) to determine differences in clinical features and surgical outcomes between superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) patients with primarily auditory or vestibular complaints.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single surgeon series at the tertiary academic medical center from 2002 to 2021.

METHODS

Retrospective review of SCDS patients who underwent surgical repair. (1) Patients were administered a standardized symptom questionnaire at preoperative and follow-up visits, and results were compared with paired statistical testing. (2) Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on either auditory or vestibular chief complaint and differences in demographic, clinical, and outcome variables were examined.

RESULTS

Our study included 113 patients with 118 operated ears. Twenty-seven patients (24%) had radiographic bilateral dehiscence. 10/11 auditory symptoms (91%) and 5/8 vestibular symptoms (63%) solicited on the questionnaire improved significantly with surgery, except for nonpulsatile tinnitus, sense of imbalance, positional dizziness, and oscillopsia. Analyses stratified by chief complaint (auditory vs vestibular) revealed overall similar characteristics and surgical outcomes. Patients with chief vestibular complaints underwent surgery at an earlier age (45.5 vs 53.9 years, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SCD surgery alleviates a wide range of auditory and vestibular symptoms. Overall, we did not find significant differences between patients with chief auditory versus vestibular complaints, and both groups benefited from surgery. Symptoms are not directly linked to third-window physiology and certain vestibular symptoms may be more likely to persist. Bilateral dehiscence may play an important role in persistent symptoms as well.

Computed tomography approximated superior semicircular canal dehiscence size and location and their association with clinical presentation

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the relationship of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) size and location with patient symptomatology and audiometry.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed SSCD cases presented to a tertiary institution between 2011 and 2022. Dehiscence length and width measured on high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography imaging were used to calculate an approximate dehiscence area (ADA). Dehiscence location was classified employing a six-grade system. Multivariable regression analyses were performed with symptomatology and audiogram metrics as outcome variables and ADA and dehiscence location as the primary covariates of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 402 SSCD were included in the analysis. Controlling for patient age, sex, dehiscence laterality, and location, greater ADA was independently associated higher rates of autophony (aOR 1.39; 95% C.I. 1.14-1.71; P = 0.004) and hyper-amplification (aOR 1.39; 1.14-1.70; P = 0.004). Additionally, dehiscences with greater ADA exhibited significantly lower bone conduction threshold at 500 Hz (adjusted β -1.75, P = 0.006) and 1000 Hz (adjusted β -1.61, P = 0.018) and significantly wider air-bone gap at 500 Hz (adjusted β 2.22, P < 0.001) and 1000 Hz (adjusted β 1.00, P = 0.039). Dehiscence location was not independently associated with any outcome variable examined when accounting for dehiscence size.

CONCLUSION

The size of dehiscence is more independently related to clinical presentations than the anatomical location of the dehiscence in the superior semicircular canal. Greater dehiscence size is associated with symptomatology and audiometry consistent with more severe bone conduction hyperacusis.

Postoperative Pneumolabyrinth Following the Middle Cranial Fossa Approach for Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Repair, 2014-2020

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigates risk factors and clinical outcomes of postoperative pneumolabyrinth following the middle cranial fossa approach for superior semicircular canal dehiscence repair, a complication that has not been documented previously.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary/quaternary care referral center.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 332 middle cranial fossa procedures from 2014 to 2020 at a tertiary/quaternary care institution. Upon identifying pneumolabyrinth cases from postoperative computed tomography temporal bone scans, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis to explore demographic and clinical factors that were independently linked to this complication. We also compared the rates of postoperative symptoms among patients with different grades of pneumolabyrinth.

RESULTS

We identified 41 (12.3%) pneumolabyrinth cases. Patients with older age, higher preoperative pure tone average, and frank dehiscence were at higher risk for pneumolabyrinth. Furthermore, patients with pneumolabyrinth reported significantly higher rates of postoperative dizziness and exhibited significantly greater pure tone average and air-bone gap postoperatively as compared with patients without pneumolabyrinth. Finally, higher-grade pneumolabyrinth was associated with increased rates of postoperative hearing loss, and grade III pneumolabyrinth was associated with higher rates of postoperative tinnitus vs grade I and II cases.

CONCLUSION

Pneumolabyrinth following the middle cranial fossa approach was associated with poor clinical outcomes, including dizziness and auditory impairment. Old age, high preoperative pure tone average, and frank dehiscence were risk factors for this complication. The highlighted parameters may be important to note when considering this approach as a treatment option and while monitoring postoperative recovery.

Postoperative Outcomes of Patients with Thin Bone Overlying the Superior Semicircular Canal: A Single Institution's Experience

BACKGROUND

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is defined by a bony defect overlying the superior semicircular canal (SSC) in the middle cranial fossa floor, causing a myriad of vestibular and auditory symptoms. Patients with thin bone without full dehiscence overlying the SSC also present with similar symptoms. There are currently no guidelines for surgical management of patients with thin bone. The authors offer their experience with thin bone patients to characterize their symptomatology and explore whether these patients benefit from surgical intervention typically offered to SSCD patients.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty-six patients evaluated for SSCD from 2011 to 2019 were reviewed. High-resolution coronal computed tomography scans with 0.6-mm slice thickness of the temporal bones were assessed to determine whether the patient had a true dehiscence or a thin bone covering overlying the SSC. Bone that was ≤0.5 mm was considered to be "thin bone." Parameters of interest included patient demographics as well as preoperative and postoperative symptomatology. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients met inclusion criteria of having "thin bone." The mean age was 48.13 ± 12.03 years, and 65.5% of patients were female. Of the preoperative symptoms evaluated, the greatest postoperative symptomatic resolution was noted in hearing loss (92.3%), vertigo (94.4%), and oscillopsia (100%). Dizziness (56.5%) had the lowest symptomatic resolution rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical management of thin bone patients via middle fossa craniotomy, a similar technique to SSCD repair, provides significant symptomatic resolution. Therefore, surgery should be considered in thin bone patients with debilitating symptoms, albeit not having a true dehiscence.

Endoscopic-Assisted Keyhole Middle Cranial Fossa Approach for Small Vestibular Schwannomas

The classical middle cranial fossa approach (MCFA) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) removal often requires a large incision and craniotomy, excessive temporal lobe manipulation, and a longer recovery. We describe a keyhole MCFA (KMCFA) with endoscopic assistance that allows for adequate access with minimal temporal lobe manipulation, resulting in a fast recovery and an invisible scar. Eight sides of four cadaveric heads were dissected through the endoscopic-assisted KMCFA to access the internal auditory canal (IAC). Furthermore, five patients with intracanalicular VS underwent tumor removal with the endoscopic-assisted KMCFA. During the endoscopic-assisted KMCFA with fine instruments, a 3-cm supra-auricular incision and a 2-cm diameter keyhole craniotomy achieved exposure of the entire length of the IAC in all cadaveric dissections without unintended violation of the cochlea, semicircular canal, and facial nerve. The gross tumor was totally removed in five patients with no major postoperative complications. The surgical time was reduced, the hearing outcomes were similar to those of the classical MCFA, and the scar was invisible 1 month after the surgery. The endoscopic-assisted KMCFA permits intracanalicular VS removal in a safe, efficient, and cosmetic way. For small intracanalicular VSs, this approach can replace the classical MCFA when indicated.

Selective scalp block decreases short term post-operative pain scores and opioid use after craniotomy: A case series

There is no consensus on the management of post-craniotomy pain. Several randomized controlled trials have examined the use of a regional scalp block for post-craniotomy pain. We aim to investigate whether scalp block affected short or long-term pain levels and opioid use after craniotomy. This study prospectively administered selective scalp blocks (lesser occipital, preauricular nerve block + pin site block) in 20 consecutive patients undergoing craniotomy for semicircular canal dehiscence. Anesthesia, pain, and opioid outcomes in these patients were compared to 40 consecutive historic controls. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the two groups and no complications related to selective scalp block. The time between the end of procedure and end of anesthesia decreased in the scalp block group (16 vs 21 min, P = 0.047). Pain scores were significantly less in the scalp block group for the first 4 h, after which there was no statistically significant difference. Time to opioid rescue was longer in the scalp block group (3.6 vs 1.8 h, HR 0.487, P = 0.0361) and opioid use in the first 7 h was significantly less in the scalp block group. Total opioid use, outpatient opioid use, and length of stay did not differ. Selective scalp block is a safe and effective tool for short-term management of postoperative pain after craniotomy and decreases the medication requirement during emergence and recovery. Selective scalp block can speed up OR turnover but is not efficacious in the treatment of postoperative pain beyond this point.

Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Revision Surgery Outcomes: A Single Institution's Experience

BACKGROUND

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is an abnormality of the otic capsule, which normally overlies the superior semicircular canal. Surgical management is indicated in patients with persistent and debilitating symptoms. Given the complexity of the disease, there are patients who experience less favorable surgical outcomes and require revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to report to the rate of postoperative symptomatic improvement in patients who required revision surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing SSCD surgical repair at a single institution was performed. Information on patient demographics, primary and secondary surgical approaches, surgical outcomes, and follow-up length was collected.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients underwent 20 revision surgeries. There were eleven (65%) females and six (35%) males. Mean age of the cohorts was 50 years (range 30-68 years), and mean follow-up length was 6.8 months (range 0.1-31.1 months). Cerebrospinal fluid leak was noted in 67% of cases. The greatest postoperative symptomatic resolution was reported in oscillopsia (100%), headache (100%), and internal sound amplification (71%), while the least postoperative symptomatic resolution was reported in tinnitus (42%), aural fullness (40%), and dizziness (29%).

CONCLUSIONS

Revision surgery can provide symptomatic improvement in select SSCD patients; however, patients should be cautioned about the possibility of less favorable outcomes than in index surgery. Revision surgeries are associated with a considerably higher rate of perioperative cerebrospinal fluid leak.

Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Outcomes in a Consecutive Series of 229 Surgical Repairs With Middle Cranial Fossa Craniotomy

BACKGROUND

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is the appearance of a third mobile window between the middle fossa and the superior semicircular canal. Surgical management is indicated in patients with persistent and debilitating symptoms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between preoperative variables that may impact postoperative symptomatic resolution.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective analysis was performed on patients who were surgically treated for SSCD. Patients were divided to different cohorts based on unilateral or bilateral nature of the disease. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 229 surgical repairs were analyzed. Mean age was 51 years (± 7.8 years), and 55.9% of patients were female. All cohorts were similar with respect to baseline demographics. The most commonly reported preoperative symptoms were tinnitus, dizziness, and autophony. The greatest symptomatic resolution was seen in autophony, internal sound amplification, hyperacusis, and oscillopsia. The unilateral SSCD cohort had significantly higher improvement of autophony (P = 0.003), aural fullness (P = 0.05), tinnitus (P = 0.006), hearing loss (P = 0.02), dizziness (P = 0.006), and headache (P = 0.007), compared with the bilateral SSCD cohorts. Among patients with bilateral disease, those with unilateral surgery reported greater symptomatic resolution with respect to hyperacusis (P = 0.03), hearing loss (P = 0.02), dizziness (P = 0.03), and disequilibrium (P < 0.001), than those with bilateral operations.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical management of SSCD leads to high rates of postoperative symptomatic improvement. Patients with unilateral SSCD benefit greater symptomatic resolution compared to those with bilateral pathology.

Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

Patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) can present with a range of auditory and/or vestibular signs and symptoms that are associated with a bony defect of the superior semicircular canal (SSC). Over the past two decades, advances in diagnostic techniques have raised the awareness of SCDS and treatment approaches have been refined to improve patient outcomes. However, a number of challenges remain. First, there is currently no standardized clinical testing algorithm for quantifying the effects of superior canal dehiscence (SCD). SCDS mimics a number of common otologic disorders and established metrics such as supranormal bone conduction thresholds and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) measurements; although useful in certain cases, have diagnostic limitations. Second, while high-resolution computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the detection of SCD, a bony defect does not always result in signs and symptoms. Third, even when SCD repair is indicated, there is a lack of consensus about nomenclature to describe the SCD, ideal surgical approach, specific repair techniques, and type of materials used. Finally, there is no established algorithm in evaluation of SCDS patients who fail primary repair and may be candidates for revision surgery. Herein, we will discuss both contemporary and emerging diagnostic approaches for patients with SCDS and highlight challenges and controversies in the management of this unique patient cohort.

Concurrent superior semicircular canal dehiscence and endolymphatic hydrops: A novel case series

INTRODUCTION

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is characterized by CT-confirmed bony erosion over the superior semicircular canal, creating vestibular and auditory symptoms. Endolymphatic hydrops (EH) is characterized by an MRI-confirmed excess of endolymph within the scala media that distorts the membranous labyrinth. While there is overlap in symptoms, the two diseases result from different pathophysiologies and require different interventions.

PRESENTATION OF CASES

A retrospective chart review was conducted at the University of California, Los Angeles on a database of 270 adult SSCD patients, gathered between March 2011 and February 2020. A review of clinical notes, post-operative findings, and imaging was performed for 16 patients who had both CT-confirmed SSCD and an MRI of the internal auditory canal (IAC). Three cases of concurrent SSCD and EH were identified. Medical and surgical history, symptom progression pre- and post-operatively, and treatment outcomes were gathered. One patient's symptoms were resolved via mycophenolate mofetil, another's via hydrochlorothiazide, and the third's via hydrochlorothiazide and bilateral hearing aids.

DISCUSSION

Post-surgical persistence of SSCD symptoms that are mutually shared with EH is the strongest indicator that a physician should investigate for concurrent EH. VEMP and audiogram testing in these cases can be misleading and should not be relied on as rule-in or rule-out tests.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent SSCD and EH is a rare but treatable entity. Physicians should consider ordering an MRI of the IAC if SSCD patients' symptoms persist or recur after a successful surgery.

Analysis of temporal bone thickness outside of the petrous temporal bone between superior semicircular canal dehiscence and normal patients

BACKGROUND

SSCD is a rare inner ear disorder. This study aims to compare the thickness of the temporal bone beyond the petrous portion between healthy subjects and those with SSCD to determine whether the etiopathology of SSCD is localized to the petrous temporal bone or generalized to other parts of the temporal bone.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of electronic medical records from September 2011 to February 2018 was conducted at a single-institution study at the University of California, Los Angeles. Participants were divided into two groups: Group 1 had a confirmed diagnosis of SSCD, while Group 2 had no known ear or temporal bone pathology. Participants' high-resolution coronal and axial temporal bone computed tomography scans were analyzed. Regions within the temporal bone were measured and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 262 scans were included. Group 1 consisted of 103 scans, while Group 2 consisted of 159 scans. There was no statistically significant difference in the thickness of temporal bones between patients diagnosed with SSCD and patients without otologic disease.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the etiology of SSCD is limited to the petrous portion of the temporal bone. SSCD may be unrelated to a larger process of global temporal bone degeneration. Additional clinical screening for regions outside the petrous temporal bone is not warranted unless SSCD patients present with symptoms characteristic of other temporal bone pathologies.

Sealing of superior semicircular canal dehiscence is associated with improved balance outcomes postoperatively versus plugging of the canal in middle fossa craniotomy repairs: a case series

OBJECTIVE

The authors compared postoperative symptoms between patients with sealed and those with plugged semicircular canal dehiscence repairs.

METHODS

In total, 136 ears from 118 patients who underwent surgical repair for semicircular canal dehiscence were identified via chart review. Data from postoperative MRI scans showing preservation or loss of semicircular canal fluid signal and postoperative reports of autophony, amplification, aural fullness, tinnitus, hyperacusis, hearing loss, vertigo, dizziness, disequilibrium, oscillopsia, and headache were amalgamated and analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with preservation of fluid signal were far less likely to have dizziness postoperatively (p = 0.007, OR 0.158, 95% CI 0.041-0.611). In addition, these patients were more likely to have tinnitus postoperatively (p = 0.028, OR 3.515, 95% CI 1.145-10.787).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found that superior semicircular canal dehiscence patients who undergo sealing without plugging have improved balance outcomes but show more tinnitus postoperatively than patients who undergo plugging.

A Basis for Standardizing Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Management

OBJECTIVES

(1) To determine how otologic/neurotologic surgeons counsel patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD). (2) To understand the plethora of presenting symptoms associated with SSCD and appropriate management. (3) To suggest appropriate management; oftentimes avoiding surgery.

METHODS

This was a survey study of both community and academic physicians. A 23-question survey was distributed to all members of the American Neurotological (ANS) and American Otologic Societies (AOS) via email in the Fall of 2018. A total of 54 responses were received from a possible pool of 279 for a response rate of 19.4%. Inferences were made about the population through sample proportions and confidence intervals.

RESULTS

All respondents use computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing SSCD and 11.1% use CT exclusively. Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP; 77.8%) are used more often than ocular VEMPs (38.9%). Magnetic resonance imaging (7.4%) is used infrequently; 96.3% of surgeons surveyed have seen patients with SSCD on imaging that are asymptomatic. Following surgical treatment, respondents reported balance issues and mild-to-moderate high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (88.4%); 32.6% reported that the majority (>50%) of their patients needed further intervention after surgery, typically aggressive vestibular rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a discrepancy in the systematic approach to SSCD between both the surgeons and the published literature. Patients with SSCD on ultra-high-resolution CT may have myriad symptoms while others are asymptomatic, and surgery may lead to additional complications. We will present a methodical recommendation to assist in the management of patients with SSCD depending upon their symptoms. This may improve patient selection, counseling, and outcomes.

Thinning or dehiscence of bone in structures of the middle cranial fossa floor in superior semicircular canal dehiscence

BACKGROUND

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is a rare inner ear disorder; currently, it is unknown whether the etiopathology underlying this structural irregularity affects neighboring structures. The goal is to investigate the prevalence of bone thinning in areas of the middle cranial fossa (MCF) floor in SSCD and non-SSCD patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 100 patients from March 2011 to June 2017 at a tertiary referral center. 100 patients undergoing 118 SSCD repair surgeries (18 bilateral) were identified. 12 SSCD ears were excluded due to lack of pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans or history of prior SSCD repair at an outside facility. Non-SSCD ears were identified from routinely-obtained CT scans for temporal bone fracture (fractured sides excluded) for a total of 101 ears; 26 non-SSCD ears were excluded due to lack of high-resolution imaging.

RESULTS

Univariate analyses reveal that SSCD diagnosis is associated with higher rates of geniculate ganglion (GG) dehiscence compared with non-SSCD controls (42.7 vs. 24%; χ²(1) = 9.69,P = 0.008). Individuals with SSCD depicted significantly thinner bone overlying the geniculate ganglion (GG) (0.23 ± 1.2 mm) compared to controls (0.28 ± 1.8 mm, (t(1 6 4)) = 2.1, P = 0.04). SSCD patients presented thinner bone overlying the internal auditory canal (IAC) (0.33 ± 1.3 mm) compared to patients without SSCD (0.46 ± 1.6 mm, (t(2 5 7) = 6.4, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The increased prevalence of dehiscence of the MCF in this cohort of SSCD patients compared to non-SSCD patients suggests that the etiology underlying SSCD affects surrounding structures.

Comparison of Transmastoid and Middle Fossa Approaches for Superior Canal Dehiscence Repair: A Multi-institutional Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes for patients undergoing a transmastoid approach versus a middle fossa craniotomy approach with plugging and/or resurfacing for repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Outcome measures include symptom resolution, hearing, operative time, hospital stay, complications, and revision rates.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective comparative cohort study.

SETTINGS

Three tertiary neurotology centers.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

All adult patients undergoing repair for superior canal dehiscence between 2006 and 2017 at 3 neurotology centers were included. Demographics and otologic history collected by chart review. Imaging, audiometric data, and vestibular evoked myogenic potential measurements were also collected for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients (74 ears) were included in the study. Twenty-one patients underwent middle fossa craniotomy repair (mean age, 47.9 years), and 47 underwent transmastoid repair (mean age, 48.0 years). There were no significant differences in age or sex distribution between the groups. The transmastoid group experienced a significantly shorter duration of hospitalization and lower recurrence rate as compared with the middle fossa craniotomy group (3.8% vs 33%). Both groups experienced improvement in noise-induced vertigo, autophony, pulsatile tinnitus, and nonspecific vertigo. There was no significant difference among symptom resolution between groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in audiometric outcomes between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Both the transmastoid approach and the middle fossa craniotomy approach for repair of superior canal dehiscence offer symptom resolution with minimal risk. The transmastoid approach was associated with shorter hospital stays and lower recurrence rate as compared with the middle fossa craniotomy approach.

Clinical Assessment of Patients with Bilateral Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

OBJECTIVE

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is caused by a deformity in the arcuate eminence, leading to various vestibular and auditory symptoms that can manifest unilaterally or bilaterally. The aim of the present study was to distinguish the differences in symptoms, treatment options, and outcomes between patients with unilateral and bilateral SSCD.

METHODS

A retrospective medical record analysis was conducted to identify patients with SSCD treated at a tertiary care center from March 2011 to May 2017. The patient demographic data, preoperative symptom presentation, and postoperative outcomes were extracted. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics. Fisher's exact tests were computed to investigate the relationships between binary variables, with a significance level of P < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 99 patients with SSCD had been treated at our institution from March 2011 to May 2017. Of these 99 patients, 41 (41.4%) had a diagnosis of bilateral SSCD. Of the 41 patients with bilateral SSCD, 27 (65.9%) were women, and the mean age was 53.6 ± 10.9 years (range, 31.7-73.9). The most common presenting symptom was tinnitus (n = 33; 80.4%) and dizziness (n = 33; 80.4%). Previous trauma to the head correlated with a bilateral SSCD presentation (P = 0.04). Trends were reported between female sex and bilateral SSCD [r(35) = 0.32379; P = 0.0506]. Postoperatively, trends were also found, with greater rates of dizziness in patients with bilateral SSCD compared with those with unilateral SSCD (odds ratio, 3.81; P = 0.0659), and less improvement in dizziness (odds ratio, 0.186; P = 0.0627). No other significant differences were found between the symptoms or clinical outcomes and improvements between the bilateral and unilateral cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral SSCD might result in different clinical symptoms that are more prevalent compared with unilateral SSCD. The findings from the present series of patients with bilateral SSCD suggest that patient symptoms and history are important in the diagnosis of bilateral SSCD and deciding whether 1 or both dehiscences requires surgical intervention.

Superior Canal Dehiscence: A Comparative Postmortem Multislice Computed Tomography Study

OBJECTIVE

Superior canal dehiscence is defined by missing bony coverage of the superior canal against the middle cranial fossa. The gold standard in diagnosis is high-resolution computed tomography (CT). A false-positive CT scan, identifying a dehiscence when one is not present, could lead to unnecessary surgical therapy. This study aims to compare postmortem CT scans with autopsy findings with regard to superior canal dehiscence.

STUDY DESIGN

Postmortem study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two nontraumatic death cases within a 3-month period (January to March 2017) were included with 44 temporal bones. Each body underwent postmortem head CT prior to medicolegal autopsy. The middle fossa floor was exposed, and if present, the superior semicircular canal dehiscence was identified and measured. In each case, 3 comparable photographs were taken during the autopsy (left temporal bone, right temporal bone, overview).

RESULTS

Autopsy findings revealed bony dehiscences in 11% of the temporal bones, whereas CT scan revealed bony dehiscences in 16%. The length of the dehiscences were longer when measured by CT imaging.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence syndrome requires high-resolution CT with clinical symptoms and physiologic evidence of a third mobile window. Our study underlines a mismatch between multislice CT imaging in the coronal plane and the presence of a dehiscence on autopsy.

Middle cranial fossa approach for the repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence is associated with greater symptom resolution compared to transmastoid approach

BACKGROUND

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is a disorder of the skull base that is gaining increasing recognition among neurosurgeons. Traditionally, the middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach has been used for the surgical repair of SSCD. However, the transmastoid (TM) approach is an alternative strategy that has demonstrated promising results.

METHODS

We performed independent searches of a popular database to identify studies that described outcomes following the surgical repair of SSCD through MCF and TM approaches. The primary outcome was symptom resolution.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 24 studies that described 230 patients that underwent either an MCF (n = 148, 64%) approach or a TM (n = 82, 36%) approach for primary surgical repair of SSCD. A greater percentage of patients in the MCF group experienced resolution of auditory symptoms (72% vs 59%, p = 0.012), aural fullness (83% vs 55%, p = 0.049), hearing loss (57% vs 31%, p = 0.026), and disequilibrium (75% vs 44%, p = 0.001) when compared to the TM group. The MCF approach was also associated with higher odds of symptom resolution for auditory symptoms (odds ratio [OR] 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-2.82), aural fullness (OR 4.02, 95% CI 1.04-15.53), hearing loss (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.14-7.42), and disequilibrium (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.78-8.73). The mean follow-up was 9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature suggests that the MCF approach for the repair of SSCD is associated with greater symptom resolution when compared to the TM approach. This information could help facilitate patient discussions.

Bone Metabolic Markers in the Clinical Assessment of Patients with Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

BACKGROUND

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is a bony defect in the osseous shell of the petrous temporal bone. The pathophysiological association between osteoporosis and SSCD remains poorly understood. We investigated the relationship between bone metabolic markers and symptoms in patients with SSCD.

METHODS

We collected patient demographics and clinical parameters for adult patients diagnosed with SSCD on high-resolution computed tomography scans. We used point-biserial correlation analysis to investigate the relationship between bone metabolic markers and symptoms in patients with SSCD. We compared clinical symptoms before and after surgical repair of SSCD through a middle fossa craniotomy using McNemar's test for paired comparisons of binary measures.

RESULTS

We included a total of 99 patients (64 females and 35 males; average age 52 years; 118 surgeries). The level of serum calcium correlated with the need for a second surgery (r_pb = -0.35, P = 0.001). Postoperative calcium supplementation negatively correlated with improvement in dizziness (r_pb = -0.36, P = 0.01). The level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D correlated with preoperative hyperacusis (r_pb = -0.98, P = 0.02) and postoperative autophony (r_pb = 0.96, P = 0.04). Postoperative vitamin D supplementation positively correlated with hearing decline (r_pb = 0.04, P = 0.04) The level of thyroid stimulating hormone correlated with preoperative autophony, amplification, and tinnitus (r_pb = -0.71, r_pb = -0.75, r_pb = -0.70, all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Bone metabolic markers could be important in the clinical assessment of SSCD patients and could be potential targets for symptom management.