The relationship between cervical lordosis and Nurick scores in patients undergoing circumferential vs. posterior alone cervical decompression, instrumentation and fusion for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Do cervical spine angles differ in patients with hypermobility who suffer from neck pain?

BACKROUND

There has been a noted increase in the number of patients experiencing chronic neck pain who exhibit diminished cervical lordosis upon radiographic examinations. While neck overuse contributes to this trend, early identification and treatment of predisposing factors such as hypermobility can potentially mitigate this increase.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the impact of hypermobility on cervical angles, neck disability and health quality in patients experiencing neck pain.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants aged between 20 and 40 years with neck pain persisting for more than three months were recruited. Patients were stratified based on hypermobility status. Lateral cervical radiographs were obtained to measure various cervical angles. Disability associated with neck pain and health-related quality of life were assessed. The influence of hypermobility on these parameters in neck pain patients was examined.

RESULTS

Hypermobile patients with neck pain exhibited significantly lower C0-2 Cobb angle (Cohen's d: 0.60), decreased C2-7 angle measured by Jackson physiological stress lines (Cohen's d: 0.42), increased cranial tilt (Cohen's d: 0.561), and greater C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (Cohen's d: 0.36) compared to non-hypermobile patients with neck pain. No significant differences were observed in neck disability or health-related quality of life between hypermobile and non-hypermobile neck pain patients. There was a weak association between a more physiologic cervical lordosis and a lower disability scores among hypermobile patients with neck pain.

CONCLUSION

Hypermobility may lead to alterations in cervical spinal angles in young adults with neck pain. Early detection and intervention could help maintain cervical angles and prevent lordosis reduction.

Meta-Analysis of Treatment for Adjacent Two-Segment Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Comparison Between Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) vs Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF) in treating adjacent two-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of ACDF compared to ACCF.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase up to December 2023. Studies included were prospective and observational involving ACDF or ACCF for adjacent two-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Data were analyzed using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Ten studies (nine case-control and one RCT) were included. ACDF showed a shorter hospital stay (SMD = -0.29, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.04, P < 0.05), better Cobb angle (SMD = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.74, P < 0.01), and improved T1S (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.80, P < 0.01). No significant differences were found in upper limb VAS, neck VAS, JOA scores, NDI, fusion rates, C2-7 SVA, total complications, blood loss, and operation time.

CONCLUSIONS

ACDF and ACCF are both effective for adjacent two-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy, with ACDF offering advantages in hospitalization duration and cervical curvature restoration, making it the preferred surgical approach. Further research is needed to validate these findings.

Cervical alignment and clinical outcome of open-door laminoplasty vs. laminectomy and instrumentation in kyphotic multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine whether the sagittal lordotic alignment, clinical outcomes and axial symptoms (AS) could be improved by kyphotic correction through the posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy (CDM) and to further analyze the changes of cervical spinal alignment parameters after correction of kyphosis. The hypothesis was that correction of kyphosis can improve the severity of AS and neurological recovery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 109 patients who suffered from multilevel CDM combined with kyphosis. The patients had undergone open-door laminoplasty (Group LP, 53 patients) and laminectomy with instrumentation (Group LI, 56 patients) between January 2014 and December 2018. Cervical spinal alignment parameters, including curvature index (CI), T1 slope, C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 SVA, were measured on the pre- and postoperative lateral radiographs. The recovery rate was calculated based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. AS severity was quantified using Neck Disability Index (NDI). A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

Analyses of postoperative follow-up data showed significant differences (P < 0.001) in CI, correction of CI, C2-7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, C2-7 SVA and NDI between Group LP and LI, but no significant differences in JOA score (P = 0.23) and recovery rate (P = 0.13). There were significant differences (P < 0.001) in CI, T1 slope, C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 SVA, JOA score, and NDI between pre- and postoperative follow-up in both groups. Correction of CI showed negative correlation with AS severity (r = -0.51, P < 0.001), and no association with recovery rate (r = 0.14, P = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfied neurological improvement was achieved by LP and LI for multilevel CDM combined with kyphosis. Cervical kyphotic correction produced significant improvement of AS and increase of T1 slope and C2-7 SVA. However, the kyphotic correction may not be associated with better neurological recovery in the short-term postoperative period.

Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine: radiographic analysis of 111 asymptomatic adolescents, a retrospective observational study

Purpose

To describe the cervical spine morphology and explore its relationship to global sagittal alignment parameters in the asymptomatic adolescent population. 

Methods

A total of 111 adolescent subjects were included. Sagittal alignment parameters, including C7 Slope, C2-C7 Cobb, C2-7 plumb line (PL), C2-S1 Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA), C7-S1 SVA, T5-12 Cobb, T10-L2 Cobb, L1-S1 Cobb, pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS), were obtained from lateral radiographs. 

Results

Forty-four males and sixty-seven females with a mean age of 16.12 ± 2.40 years were included in this study. The mean values of C7 Slope, C2-7 Cobb and C2-7PL were 20.45 ± 8.88°, -7.72 ± 12.10°, and 13.53 ± 11.63 mm, respectively. C2-7 Cobb, C7 Slope showed significant differences between the male and female groups. Correlation analysis showed that C7 slope was significantly correlated with C2-7 Cobb (r = -0.544, P < 0.001), C2-S1 SVA (r = 0.335, P < 0.001), and C7-S1 SVA (r = 0.310, P = 0.001), but not lumbosacral parameters(L5-S1 Cobb, PI, PT, SS). Using a modified method of Toyama to describe the cervical spine morphology, there were 37 cases (33.3%) in the Lordotic group, and C7 slope, C2-7 Cobb and C2-7PL showed significant differences between groups. According to C2-C7 Cobb, there were 80 Lordotic cases (72.1%). C7 slope and C2-7PL were significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusion

The cervical spine morphology of asymptomatic adolescents varies widely, from lordotic to kyphotic. Combining different classification methods provides a better understanding of the morphology of the cervical spine. C7 slope is an important predictor of global sagittal balance and C2-7PL is a key parameter for restoring cervical lordosis, which should be considered pre-operatively and for conservative treatment. Cervical regional sagittal alignment parameters are not correlated with lumbosacral parameters, and C2-7 Cobb, C7 Slope showed significant differences between males and females.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of posterior cervical decompression and fusion for severe cervical compressive-extension injury: A case series

BACKGROUND

Although severe cervical compressive-extension (CE) injuries are usually repaired using a combined anterior-posterior approach, the repair is possible using a posterior approach alone with reliable anchors. This study aimed to present the outcomes and imaging analysis results of posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) for severe CE injuries.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 16 patients who underwent PCDF surgery for severe CE injuries (>50% subluxation) between January 2012 and December 2018. All patients completed 1-year follow-up, and their mean age at the time of surgery was 63.5 years. American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade, kyphotic angle of lower vertebra (KALV), and anterior defect area of lower vertebra (ADLV) were assessed preoperatively.

RESULTS

Of 16 patients, nine patients improved at the final follow-up, and eight patients could walk with or without assistance. All patients achieved bone union postoperatively, but four patients showed progression of correction loss of ≥10°. Therefore, patients were divided into two groups: NL group with correction loss of <10°; L group with correction loss of ≥10°. All patients in L group showed KALV of ≥15°, while 10 of 12 patients in NL group showed KALV of <15°. Furthermore, all patients in L group showed ADLV of ≥50%, whereas all patients in NL group showed ADLV of <50%.

CONCLUSIONS

PCDF is feasible and a favorable procedure for severe CE injuries that require early reduction and cervical spinal stabilization. However, in the cases of advanced destruction of the anterior vertebra, loss of correction after PCDF might occur postoperatively.

CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY: IS A COMBINED APPROACH NECESSARY?

ABSTRACT Objective: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the main cause of spinal dysfunction in adults. The type of surgical approach to treatment is not well defined in the literature. The objective is to report the results obtained through isolated posterior decompression in patients with a previous indication of the combined approach for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Methods: This is a therapeutic study with level of evidence II, according to the Oxford classification table. Ten patients who underwent isolated posterior approach surgery for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy were evaluated through imaging and questionnaires (visual analog scale, mJOA-Br scale – Brazilian Portuguese version of the Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Scale, and Neck Disability Index (NDI)), comparing pre- and postoperative results. Results: Late evaluation of the 10 patients was performed in the period ranging from 24 to 36 months (mean of 30.3 months ± 7.25) following surgery. The comparison of the clinical and radiological parameters in all patients showed a statistical difference in relation to the preoperative scales applied and to the degree of cervical lordosis (p <0.05), evidencing improvement after decompression and posterior fixation of the cervical spine. Conclusions: The isolated posterior approach (decompression, fixation and arthrodesis) allowed the clinical and radiological improvement of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and who had an indication of the complementary anterior approach. Level of evidence II; Retrospective study.

Determining the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable and Nonexpandable Titanium Cages in Cervical Fusion Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Expandable cages have been increasingly used in cervical and lumbar reconstructions; however, there is a paucity in the literature on how they compare with traditional nonexpandable cages in the cervical spine. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis, comparing the clinical and radiologic outcomes of expandable versus nonexpandable corpectomy cage use in the cervical spine.

METHODS

A database search identified studies detailing the outcomes of expandable and nonexpandable titanium cage use in the cervical spine. These studies were screened using the PRISMA protocol. Fixed-effects and random-effects models were used with a 95% confidence interval. Two analyses were carried out for each outcome: one including all studies and the other including only studies reporting on exclusively 1-level and 2-level cases.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were included. The mean change in segmental lordosis was significantly greater in expandable cages (all, 6.72 vs. 3.69°, P < 0.001; 1-level and 2-level, 6.81° vs. 4.31°, P < 0.001). The mean change in cervical lordosis was also significantly greater in expandable cages (all, 5.71° vs. 3.11°, P = 0.027; 1-level and 2-level, 5.71° vs. 2.07°, P = 0.002). No significant difference was found between the complication rates (all, P = 0.43; 1-level and 2-level, P = 0.94); however, the proportion of revisions was significantly greater in expandable cages (all, 0.06 vs. 0.02, P = 0.03; 1-level and 2-level, 0.08 vs. 0.01, P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of expandable cages may carry a modest improvement in radiologic outcomes compared with nonexpandable cages in the cervical spine; however, they may also lead to a higher rate of revisions based on our analyses.

The importance of preoperative T1 slope for determining proper postoperative C2-7 Cobb's angle in patients undergoing cervical reconstruction

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the relationship among different cervical sagittal parameters in asymptomatic volunteers and the correlation between surgical efficacy and difference of presumed and actual postoperative C2-7 Cobbs's angle (C2-7COBB), which was calculated based on preoperative T1 slope (T1S) in patients undergoing cervical reconstruction.

METHODS

In total, 158 inpatients with cervical spondylosis and 274 asymptomatic volunteers were retrospectively reviewed. Cervical sagittal parameters, such as C2-7COBB, T1S, thoracic inlet angle (TIA), and neck tilt (NT), were compared. Then, the correlation among these parameters was analyzed in asymptomatic volunteers, and a regression equation between T1S and C2-7COBB was established and used to analyze the correlation among the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score improvement, the sagittal parameters, and the difference between presumed and actual postoperative C2-7COBB in patients after cervical reconstruction.

RESULTS

The mean T1S, C2-7COBB, and TIA were significantly decreased in patients (P < 0.01). T1S and NT had a strong correlation with TIA (P < 0.01). T1S demonstrated a moderate correlation with C2-7COBB in asymptomatic volunteers (r = 0.569, P < 0.01). A regression equation had been established as C2-7COBB = 0.742 × T1S - 0.866. The mean C2-7COBB and JOA score improved significantly (P < 0.05) postoperatively. Moreover, the JOA improvement rate showed a significant negative correlation with the difference in the presumed and actual postoperative C2-7COBB (r = - 0.696, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our study successfully established a regression equation for calculating postsurgical C2-7COBB based on the correlation between T1S and C2-7COBB in asymptomatic volunteers. The regression equation could be used for guiding surgeons to accomplish an ideal postsurgical C2-7COBB for patients with cervical spondylosis.

Effect of Titanium Miniplate Fixation on Hinge Fracture and Hinge Fracture Displacement Following Cervical Open-Door Laminoplasty

BACKGROUND

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is a neuromotor disorder responsible for functional limitations and decreased daily activities. Expansive open-door laminoplasty is the widely accepted procedure for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Among the various fixation procedures to secure the open lamina, miniplate fixation provides better clinical and radiological outcomes. However, the immediate effects on hinge fracture and hinge fracture displacement following miniplate fixation have not been proven until now. The purpose of our study was to elucidate the impact of cervical open-door angle on the status of spinal cord expansion and hinge fracture, hinge fracture displacement, and the role of implants used during surgery.

METHODS

For this retrospective study, 122 patients who had undergone surgery from September 2016 to November 2017 with preoperative and postoperative radiographs were enrolled. Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed before and after surgery.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in demographics, surgery time, blood loss, medical comorbidities, or perioperative and postoperative complications between 2 groups. The recovery rate and Nurick score before and at the follow-up show no statistical significance between the 2 groups, P value > .05 (P = .672) and P > .05 (P = .553), respectively. The statistical analysis shows that the mean hinge fracture in the miniplate group with a cervical open angle >30° was 2.42 ± 1.68 and with a <30° open angle, 0.05 ± 0.23; whereas, in the anchor group the mean hinge fracture in >30° cervical open angle was 2.227 ± 2.50 and in <30° was 0.409 ± 0.503. The results revealed statistical significance between 2 implant groups, P = .024 in the aspect of hinge fracture displacement and implant used.

CONCLUSION

Laminoplasty by titanium miniplate fixation holds the laminae securely, prevents hinge fracture displacement, and promotes spinal cord expansion better than suture anchor fixation.

Can C2-6 Cobb Angle Replace C2-7 Cobb Angle?: An Analysis of Cervical Kinetic Magnetic Resonance Images and X-rays

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of consecutive 113 cervical kinetic magnetic resonance images (kMRIs) and 57 radiographs.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the relationship between C2-6 or C2-7 Cobb angle and cervical sagittal alignment parameters using kMRI, and evaluate the visibility of C6 and C7 inferior endplates on cervical radiographs.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several studies have used C2-6 Cobb angle instead of C2-7 Cobb angle as C7 inferior endplate is not always visible because of overlying shadows. However, the relationship between C2-6 or C2-7 Cobb angle and cervical sagittal alignment parameters remains unclear. Moreover, visibility of C6 inferior endplate remains unknown.

METHODS

C2-6 Cobb angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, occiput-C2 angle, Atlas-dens interval (ADI), narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS), cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical tilt, cranial tilt, neck tilt, thoracic inlet angle (TIA), and T1 slope were measured using kMRI, and analyzed for their relationship with C2-6 or C2-7 Cobb angle. Visibility rates of C6 or C7 inferior endplates were evaluated using cervical radiographs.

RESULTS

Linear regression analysis showed high association between C2-6 and C2-7 Cobb angle (R = 0.696, P < 0.01). C2-6 Cobb angle was significantly correlated with occiput-C2 angle, TIA, T1 slope, neck tilt, cSVA, and cervical tilt; but not with nPAS, ADI, and cranial tilt. C2-7 Cobb angle resembled C2-6 Cobb angle regarding the relationships with other parameters. In our study, 94.7% C6 and 50.9% C7 inferior endplate were clearly visible; 1.8% C6 and 24.6% C7 inferior endplate were invisible. Chi-square test and residual analysis showed significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

C2-6 Cobb angle highly resembled C2-7 Cobb angle regarding its relationships with parameters of craniovertebral, cervical and thoracic inlet alignment. C2-6 Cobb angle could be an alternative to C2-7 Cobb angle because of its significantly higher visibility rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.