Thrombolysis' benefits on early post-stroke language recovery in aphasia patients

Speech-language pathologists' perspectives of dysphagia following reperfusion therapies: An Australian mixed-methods study

PURPOSE

To investigate speech-language pathologists' (SLPs) perceptions and clinical experiences of dysphagia management following reperfusion therapies.

METHOD

A multi-staged mixed approach involving a two-phase cross-sectional design was used. Data generated during phase 1 (a purpose-built, online survey) guided the development of phase 2 (semi-structured interviews). Sixty-two SLPs participated in phase 1 and six SLPs participated in phase 2.

RESULT

SLPs in both phases reported perceived changes in dysphagia presentation according to the success of reperfusion therapy administered and had concerns regarding worsened dysphagia following unsuccessful procedures. Fluctuations in dysphagia were more frequently reported in the acute stage post-stroke. SLPs reported increased workload demands due to increased interhospital transfers between ECR/thrombolysis centres and referring facilities. The optimal timing for swallowing screening and assessment was not identified, with initial SLP involvement ranging from during the administration of thrombolysis to up to 24 hours post-reperfusion therapy.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary evidence suggests that SLPs perceive that the presentation of post-stroke dysphagia is changing, with increasing fluctuations and complexities in the acute stage of post-stroke care, within the context of increasing use of reperfusion therapies. There is a critical need for research investigating the trajectory of dysphagia in the acute stage to inform dysphagia management within this patient population.

Supporting Post-Stroke Language and Cognition with Pharmacotherapy: Tools for Each Phase of Care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is enormous enthusiasm for the possibility of pharmacotherapies to treat language deficits that can arise after stroke. Speech language therapy remains the most frequently utilized and most strongly evidenced treatment, but the numerous barriers to patients receiving the therapy necessary to recover have motivated the creation of a relatively modest, yet highly cited, body of evidence to support the use of pharmacotherapy to treat post-stroke aphasia directly or to augment traditional post-stroke aphasia treatment. In this review, we survey the use of pharmacotherapy to preserve and support language and cognition in the context of stroke across phases of care, discuss key ongoing clinical trials, and identify targets that may become emerging interventions in the future.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent trials have shifted focus from short periods of drug therapy supporting therapy in the chronic phase to longer terms approaching pharmacological maintenance beginning more acutely. Recent innovations in hyperacute stroke care, such as tenecteplase, and acute initiation of neuroprotective agents and serotonin reuptake inhibitors are important areas of ongoing research that complement the ongoing search for effective adjuvants to later therapy. Currently there are no drugs approved in the United States for the treatment of aphasia. Nevertheless, pharmacological intervention may provide a benefit to all phases of stroke care.

Evaluation of rTMS in patients with poststroke aphasia: a systematic review and focused meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Aphasia-acquired loss of the ability to understand or express language-is a common and debilitating neurological consequence of stroke. Evidence suggests that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can significantly improve language outcomes in patients with aphasia. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been reported to improve naming in chronic stroke patients with nonfluent aphasia since 2005.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses of TMS treatment studies in patients with aphasia. Eight electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Journals@Ovid, and clinicaltrials.gov) were searched for articles. Relevant studies were further evaluated, and studies that met inclusion criteria were reviewed. The searches were limited to human studies written in English and published between January 1960 and January 2020. In keeping with the main objective of this review, we included all studies that carried out treatment using rTMS in stroke patients with aphasia, regardless of the trial (or experimental) design of the study. Studies that implemented between-subject or randomized controlled (RCT) design, cross-over trials, and within-subject or pre-post trials were all included. Standard mean difference (SMD) for changes in picture naming accuracy was estimated.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 423 studies. Fifty articles were further evaluated to be included. Eleven met all inclusion criteria and were chosen for review. Eleven eligible studies involving 242 stroke patients were identified in this meta-analysis. Further analyses demonstrated prominent effects for the naming subtest (SMD = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.71, p = 0.01), with heterogeneity (I² = 69.101%). The meta-analysis continued to show that there was a statistically significant effect of rTMS compared with sham rTMS on the severity of aphasia. None of the patients from the 11 included articles reported adverse effects from rTMS.

CONCLUSIONS

There are some strong studies evaluating the efficacy of rTMS in stroke patients but further research is required to fully establish the usefulness of this treatment. This meta-analysis indicates a clinically positive effect of rTMS with or without speech and language therapy (SLT) for patients with aphasia following stroke in overall language function and expressive language, including naming, repetition, writing, and comprehension. Low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS over the unaffected hemisphere is effective and compatible with the concept of interhemispheric inhibition. Moreover, the treatment of 1 Hz rTMS for patients with aphasia after stroke was safe.

Study on Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Improves Speech Function and Mechanism in Patients With Non-fluent Aphasia After Stroke

Objective

To explore the therapeutic effect and mechanism of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the speech function of patients with non-fluent aphasia after stroke.

Methods

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 60 patients with post-stroke non-fluent aphasia were included and randomly divided into treatment group (rTMS group) and sham stimulation group (S-rTMS group). Patients in rTMS group were given low-frequency rTMS + ST training. Patients in the S-rTMS group were given sham low-frequency rTMS + ST training. Once a day, 5 days a week, for a total of 4 weeks. The Western Aphasia Battery and the short-form Token test were used to evaluate the language function of the patients in the two groups before and after treatment. Part of the enrolled patients were subjected to functional magnetic resonance imaging examination, and the morning fasting venous blood of the enrolled patients was drawn before and after treatment to determine the content of BDNF and TNF-α.

Results

In the comparison before and after treatment within the group, all dimensions of the WAB scale of the patients in the rTMS group increased significantly. Only two dimensions of the WAB scale of the patients in the S-rTMS group improved significantly after treatment. The results of the short-form Token test showed that patients in the rTMS group improved significantly before and after treatment. The resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging of the two groups of patients before and after treatment showed: the activation of multiple brain regions in the left hemisphere of the rTMS group increased compared with the control group. The serum BDNF content of the patients in the rTMS group was significantly higher than that of the patients in the S-rTMS group after treatment.

Conclusion

Low-frequency rTMS combined with conventional speech training can significantly improve the speech function of patients with non-fluent aphasia after stroke.

Stroke or No Stroke: A Case Report of Bilingual Aphasia

Introduction

Bilingual aphasia is an atypical stroke presentation in the multilingual patient where an isolated aphasia occurs in one language while the other remains unaffected.

Case Report

A multilingual male presented to the emergency department with expressive aphasia to English but who was still able to speak fluently in French. Receptive English was preserved. While his National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score was technically zero, his pure aphasia component qualified him as an exception. He regained some repetitive English, so fibrinolyitic therapy was not initiated.

Conclusion

Bilingual aphasia is an indication for fibrinolysis given the impact that a pure aphasic stroke has on quality of life.

Diagnosing and managing post-stroke aphasia

Introduction: Aphasia is a debilitating language disorder and even mild forms of aphasia can negatively affect functional outcomes, mood, quality of life, social participation, and the ability to return to work. Language deficits after post-stroke aphasia are heterogeneous. Areas covered: The first part of this manuscript reviews the traditional syndrome-based classification approach as well as recent advances in aphasia classification that incorporate automatic speech recognition for aphasia classification. The second part of this manuscript reviews the behavioral approaches to aphasia treatment and recent advances such as noninvasive brain stimulation techniques and pharmacotherapy options to augment the effectiveness of behavioral therapy. Expert opinion: Aphasia diagnosis has largely evolved beyond the traditional approach of classifying patients into specific syndromes and instead focuses on individualized patient profiles. In the future, there is a great need for more large scale randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of behavioral treatments, noninvasive brain stimulation, and medications to boost aphasia recovery.