1
|
Evans AR, Bakhsheshian J, Graffeo CS, Smith ZA. Surgical management of spinal pathologies in the octogenarian: a narrative review. GeroScience 2024; 46:3555-3566. [PMID: 38285294 PMCID: PMC11226583 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-024-01083-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Optimal management paradigms of spinal pathologies in the octogenarian population are controversial given the higher incidence of comorbidities with concern for poor prognosis and fear of increased complications associated with surgical management. In this narrative review, we aim to detail the complex clinical considerations when approaching odontoid screw fixation/instrumented fusion, spinal decompression, and spinal fusion in the octogenarian. Literature review was conducted via Google Scholar and PubMed databases, with literature selected based on statistical power and clinical relevance to the following pathologies/surgical techniques: odontoid fracture, surgical decompression, and surgical fusion in the octogenarian. The aforementioned pathologies were selected based on prevalence in the advanced-age population in which surgical screening techniques and management remain nonuniform. Preoperative evaluation of the octogenarian patient increasingly includes frailty, sarcopenia, and osteopenia/osteoporosis assessments. In cases of odontoid fracture, conservative management appears to provide beneficial clinical outcomes with lower rates of complication compared to surgery; however, rates of radiographic odontoid fusion are far lower in conservatively managed patients. Regarding surgical decompression and fusion, the presence of comorbidities may be more predictive of outcome rather than age status, with the advent of minimally invasive techniques providing safety and efficacy in the surgical management of this age cohort. Age status may be less pertinent than previously thought in the decision to pursue spinal surgery for odontoid fracture, spinal decompression, or spinal fusion; however, each of these procedures has respective risks and benefits that must be considered within the context of each patient's comorbidity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander R Evans
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | | | - Zachary A Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ton A, Wishart D, Ball JR, Shah I, Murakami K, Ordon MP, Alluri RK, Hah R, Safaee MM. The Evolution of Risk Assessment in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review. World Neurosurg 2024; 188:1-14. [PMID: 38677646 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk assessment is critically important in elective and high-risk interventions, particularly spine surgery. This narrative review describes the evolution of risk assessment from the earliest instruments focused on general surgical risk stratification, to more accurate and spine-specific risk calculators that quantified risk, to the current era of big data. METHODS The PubMed and SCOPUS databases were queried on October 11, 2023 using search terms to identify risk assessment tools (RATs) in spine surgery. A total of 108 manuscripts were included after screening with full-text review using the following inclusion criteria: 1) study population of adult spine surgical patients, 2) studies describing validation and subsequent performance of preoperative RATs, and 3) studies published in English. RESULTS Early RATs provided stratified patients into broad categories and allowed for improved communication between physicians. Subsequent risk calculators attempted to quantify risk by estimating general outcomes such as mortality, but then evolved to estimate spine-specific surgical complications. The integration of novel concepts such as invasiveness, frailty, genetic biomarkers, and sarcopenia led to the development of more sophisticated predictive models that estimate the risk of spine-specific complications and long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS RATs have undergone a transformative shift from generalized risk stratification to quantitative predictive models. The next generation of tools will likely involve integration of radiographic and genetic biomarkers, machine learning, and artificial intelligence to improve the accuracy of these models and better inform patients, surgeons, and payers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy Ton
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Danielle Wishart
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jacob R Ball
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ishan Shah
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kiley Murakami
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Matthew P Ordon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - R Kiran Alluri
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Raymond Hah
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michael M Safaee
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hamrick FA, Sherrod BA, Cole K, Cox P, Croci DM, Bowers CA, Mazur MD, Dailey AT, Bisson EF. Using Frailty Measures to Predict Functional Outcomes and Mortality After Type II Odontoid Fracture in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Global Spine J 2024; 14:1552-1562. [PMID: 36626221 PMCID: PMC11394509 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221149394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Single-center retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES Type II odontoid fractures occur disproportionately among elderly populations and cause significant morbidity and mortality. It is a matter of debate whether these injuries are best managed surgically or conservatively. Our goal was to identify how treatment modalities and patient characteristics correlated with functional outcome and mortality. METHODS We identified adult patients (>60 years) with traumatic type II odontoid fractures. We used multivariate regression controlling for patient demographics, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, modified Frailty Index (mFI-5 and mFI-11), fracture displacement, and conservative vs operative treatment. RESULTS Of the 59 patients (mean age 77.9 years), 24 underwent surgical intervention and 35 underwent conservative management. Operatively managed patients were younger (73.4 vs 80.6 years, P < .001) and had higher degree of fracture displacement (3.5 vs 1.0 mm, P = .002) than conservatively managed patients but no other differences in baseline characteristics. Twenty-four patients (40.7%) died within the study period (median time to death: 376 days). There were no differences between treatment groups in functional outcomes (mRS or Frankel Grade) or mortality (33.3% in operative group vs 45.7%, P = .34). There was a statistically significant correlation between higher presentation mRS score and subsequent mortality on multivariate analysis (OR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.04-4.10, P = .039), whereas surgical intervention, age, GCS score, CCI, mFI-5, mFI-11, sex, and fracture displacement were not significantly correlated. CONCLUSIONS Mortality after type II odontoid fractures in elderly patients is common. mRS score at presentation may help predict mortality more accurately than other patient factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brandon A Sherrod
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kyril Cole
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Parker Cox
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Davide M Croci
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Christian A Bowers
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Marcus D Mazur
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Andrew T Dailey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Erica F Bisson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rohollahi F, Farahbakhsh F, Kankam SB, Mohammadi M, Mohammadi A, Korkorian R, Hobabi S, Moarrefdezfouli A, Molavi S, Davies BM, Zipser CM, Laufer I, Harrop J, Arnold PM, Martin AR, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Role of Frailty Status in Prediction of Clinical Outcomes of Traumatic Spinal Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Neurotrauma 2023; 40:2453-2468. [PMID: 37432902 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Although many frailty tools have been used to predict traumatic spinal injury (TSI) outcomes, identifying predictors of outcomes after TSI in the aged population is difficult. Frailty, age, and TSI association are interesting topics of discussion in geriatric literature. However, the association between these variables are yet to be clearly elucidated. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the association between frailty and TSI outcomes. The authors searched Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant studies. Studies with observational designs that assessed baseline frailty status in individuals suffering from TSI published from inception until 26th March 2023 were included. Length of hospital stay (LoS), adverse events (AEs), and mortality were the outcomes of interest. Of the 2425 citations, 16 studies involving 37,640 participants were included. The modified frailty index (mFI) was the most common tool used to assess frailty. Meta-analysis was employed only in studies that used mFI for measuring frailty. Frailty was significantly associated with increased in-hospital or 30-day mortality (pooled odds ratio [OR]: 1.93 [1.19; 3.11]), non-routine discharge (pooled OR: 2.44 [1.34; 4.44]), and AEs or complications (pooled OR: 2.00 [1.14; 3.50]). However, no significant relationship was found between frailty and LoS (pooled OR: 3.02 [0.86; 10.60]). Heterogeneity was observed across multiple factors, including age, injury level, frailty assessment tool, and spinal cord injury characteristics. In conclusion, although there is limited data concerning using frailty scales to predict short-term outcomes after TSI, the results showed that frailty status may be a predictor of in-hospital mortality, AEs, and unfavorable discharge destination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faramarz Rohollahi
- Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farzin Farahbakhsh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Samuel Berchi Kankam
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Aynaz Mohammadi
- School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Rojin Korkorian
- School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sepehr Hobabi
- School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Azin Moarrefdezfouli
- Department of Cardiology, Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shervin Molavi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Benjamin M Davies
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Carl M Zipser
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ilya Laufer
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - James Harrop
- Department of Neurosurgery, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - Paul M Arnold
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA
- Division of Spine and Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Departments of Neurological and Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Allan R Martin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, California, USA
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Castel X, Pelletier JB, Sulpis B, Charier D, Buhot B, Mihail G, Carlioz V, Barral-Clavel F, Sylvain G, Tetard MC, Vassal F. MFI-11 Predicts Post-Operative Serious Complications in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Odontoid Fractures. Global Spine J 2023:21925682231205103. [PMID: 37776203 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231205103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/02/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to analyze postoperative complications in different mFI-11 groups after surgery for odontoid fractures in a geriatric population. METHODS A single center retrospective review of odontoid fractures surgery (between 2013 and 2022) in patients aged 65 years and older was conducted. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a major complication (Calvien-Dindo ≥4) within 30 days post-surgery. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of a major complication within 3 months after surgery, and death within 1-month post-surgery. Survival curve, multi-variate analysis was performed and adjusted receiver operating characteristic curves were generated. RESULTS There were 92 patients included in this study, with a mean age of 80.5 years. Serious complication occurred for 16 patients (17%) during hospitalization. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an mFI 11 >.27 was strongly and independently associated with serious complications within 1-month post-surgery (OR = 16.7, 95% CI = 4.50-83), as well as serious complications within 3 months post-surgery (OR = 11.8, 95% CI = 3.48-49.1) and death within 1 month post-surgery (OR = 11.7; 95% CI = 3.02-60.4). The Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) curves for the three models all have an Area Under the Curve (AUC) value greater than 0.7. CONCLUSIONS The mFI-11 is a straightforward and validated tool that can be used during the preoperative period to identify the patient's level of frailty and assess their risk of postoperative complications. Patients with mFI-11 ≥.27 are at greater risk of serious complications within 1 and 3 months' post-surgery and death within 1 month post-surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Castel
- Neurosurgery Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Pelletier
- Neurosurgery Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Benoit Sulpis
- Neurosurgery Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - David Charier
- Neurosurgery Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Benjamin Buhot
- Neurosurgery Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Gurschi Mihail
- Neurosurgery Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Violette Carlioz
- Dermatology Department, Centre Hospitalier de Firminy, Firminy, France
| | - Fanelie Barral-Clavel
- Neurosurgery Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Granges Sylvain
- Radiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Marie-Charlotte Tetard
- Neurosurgery Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Francois Vassal
- Neurosurgery Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sunder A, Chhabra H, Aryal A. Geriatric spine fractures - Demography, changing trends, challenges and special considerations: A narrative review. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2023; 43:102190. [PMID: 37538298 PMCID: PMC10393813 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this manuscript was to summarize the demography and changing trends of geriatric spinal injuries and to enumerate the challenges and special considerations in the care of geriatric spinal injuries. PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases were searched for literature on geriatric spine fractures using MeSH terms 'aged', 'aged, 80 and over', 'elderly', 'spinal fracture/epidemiology', spinal fracture/therapy∗' and keywords pertaining to the same. The search results were screened for appropriate articles and reviewed. There is a high community prevalence of elderly vertebral fractures ranging from 18% to as high as 51%. The proportion of older patients among the spinal injured is rising as well. There is a higher chance of missing spinal injuries in the elderly and clinical guidelines may not be applicable to this patient group. Classification and surgical treatment are different from younger adult counterparts as the elderly osteoporotic spine behaves differently biomechanically. There is a high incidence of respiratory complications both for surgically and conservatively managed groups. Older age generally is associated with a higher complication rate including mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Sunder
- Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - H.S. Chhabra
- Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi, 110070, India
| | - Aayush Aryal
- Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi, 110070, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Osterhoff G, Scholz M, Disch AC, Katscher S, Spiegl UJA, Schnake KJ, Scheyerer MJ. Geriatric Odontoid Fractures: Treatment Algorithms of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Based on Expert Consensus and a Systematic Review. Global Spine J 2023; 13:13S-21S. [PMID: 37084350 PMCID: PMC10177304 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231157316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review/expert consensus. OBJECTIVES Fractures of the axis represent the most frequent injury of the spine in elderly patients. Both, operative and non-operative treatment are associated with a high rate of complications and mortality. The aim of this article was to summarize the current literature on the management of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients and to weigh it based on an expert consensus process. METHODS In a joint consensus process, members of the Spine Section of the German Orthopaedic and Trauma Society (DGOU) aimed to formulate recommendations for the diagnostic workup and treatment of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients. Based on the previously published recommendations, this article is an updated version with incorporating a systematic review of the recent literature. RESULTS Based on the new data available, the recommendations established in the initial consensus process were adapted. CONCLUSIONS Computed tomography represents the diagnostic standard for patients with suspected injuries of the upper cervical spine. Anderson/D'Alonzo odontoid fractures type 1, non-displaced type 2, and type 3 can be treated conservatively. Even non-unions do not necessarily result in poor clinical outcome. In Anderson/D'Alonzo type 2 fractures, surgical therapy offers the advantage of relatively safe osseous healing with no increased complication rate even in elderly patients and can thus be recommended. In very high aged patients, however, a case-by-case decision should be made. When surgical stabilization of osteoporotic odontoid fractures is indicated, posterior techniques are biomechanically advantageous and can be considered the standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Osterhoff
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Matti Scholz
- ATOS Orthopaedic Clinic Braunfels, Braunfels, Germany
| | - Alexander C Disch
- University Comprehensive Spine Center (UCSC), University Center for Orthopaedics, Traumatology & Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Germany
| | - Sebastian Katscher
- Interdisciplinary Center for Spine and Neurotrauma, Sana Klinikum Borna, Borna, Germany
| | - Ulrich J A Spiegl
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Klaus John Schnake
- Center for Spinal and Scoliosis Surgery, Waldkrankenhaus Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Private Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Max J Scheyerer
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Koln, Germany
| |
Collapse
|