Dentoalveolar Procedures for the Anticoagulated Patient: Literature Recommendations Versus Current Practice

Controversies in Stoppage of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Medications Prior to Oral Surgery

Dental procedures can pose a risk of bleeding, and it is not uncommon for dentists to consult prescribing physicians regarding a mutual patient's antiplatelet and anticoagulant medication to prevent excessive bleeding during or after an upcoming procedure. However, there has been a growing controversy in the dental community surrounding the stoppage of these medications prior to dental procedures. Some believe that stopping these medications prior to dental procedures is necessary to reduce the risk of bleeding complications, while others argue that stopping them can increase the risk of stroke or other thromboembolic events. The debate has left many dentists and specialists unsure about the best course of action when it comes to managing bleeding risk during dental procedures.In this article, we will review the antithrombotic medications, indications, mechanism of action, and its effects on the coagulation pathway, laboratory testing and reversal agents. Also, we will explore the controversy surrounding the stoppage of novel anitplatelets (eg,: prasurgrel and ticagrelor), dual-antiplatelets, triple-antiplatelet, vitamin K antagonists (eg,: wafarin, coumadin), and direct oral anticoagulants (eg,: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, xarelto and endoxaban) in dentistry and examine the current evidence and guidelines for managing dental patients undergoing oral surgery.

The Dilemma of Peri-Procedural Warfarin Management: A Narrative Review

Periprocedural vitamin K antagonist management is a complex process and inherently entails multiple clinical issues. Marked variations have been reported in different aspects of this process. These differences were noted at the clinician and institutional levels owing to the lack of evidence-based data leading to many discrepancies in decision-making. This review aims to address the gap of vitamin K antagonist periprocedural management acknowledged by previously published prescribers’ questionnaires. One of the components of this process is “bridging,” which aims to provide minimal interruption of the anticoagulation period through the use of heparin products. Recent studies showed that bridging is increasing bleeding risk. Secondly, interruption decision relies on the classification of thromboembolism risk which depends on trials that did not include patients with atrial fibrillation. Thirdly, the interruption duration is different among different International normalization ratio levels, which strengthens the difference in the clinical practice of preoperative vitamin K antagonist management. Lastly, the resumption of a vitamin-K antagonist after surgery has many scenarios according to the procedure and patient risk of bleeding. Vitamin-K antagonist periprocedural management is complicated due to individual practice and the lack of strictly implemented institutional standardized protocols to guide, manage and evaluate the process.

Risk of postoperative bleeding following dental extractions in patients on antithrombotic treatment

Introduction

The risk of bleeding after dental extractions in patients taking antithrombotic medication is not well known. This study aims to investigate the incidence of postoperative bleeding following dental extractions in adult patients taking antithrombotic medication in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

This retrospective study included 539 patients aged 18–93 years who attended 840 appointments for dental extractions from January 2012 to June 2016 at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Patients who returned with a complaint of bleeding were treated with local hemostatic measures as outpatients.

Results and Conclusion: Only 1.7% of extraction appointments were associated with postoperative bleeding. The highest risk of bleeding was noted in patients receiving warfarin (3.88%), whereas those on clopidogrel had no significant risk of bleeding. Women were found to have the highest rate of bleeding, particularly those on newer oral anticoagulant medications.

Dental extractions can be safely done in adults receiving antithrombotic treatment, provided established guidelines are followed; therefore, dental professionals must exercise caution when planning invasive dental treatment for patients on continued antithrombotic therapy.

The Dentoalveolar Surgical Patient: Perioperative Principles Based on Contemporary Controversies

Dentoalveolar surgery comprises more than 50% of the practice of oral and maxillofacial surgeons worldwide and is the most commonly performed category of surgical procedure. Optimal strategies for management of many medical problems, however, remain unclear. Remaining current on medical and surgical perioperative strategies is a standard for best practice. This article provides contemporary approaches for the perioperative management of patients presenting for dentoalveolar surgery. Attention will be directed to the perioperative management of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and obesity. These diseases are chosen owing to controversies with respect to good scientific evidence that supports a standard of perioperative care.

International normalized ratio (INR) values in patients receiving oral vitamin K antagonists and undergoing oral surgery: A clinical audit

INTRODUCTION

Dental extractions can be safely carried out on patients under vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) therapy, without stopping or changing the dosage, but the international normalized ratio (INR) needs to be monitored on the day of the intervention, showing adequate rates before proceeding.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims at evaluating INR values, measured before oral surgery procedures, to assess the rate of patients, under VKAs therapy, outside the therapeutic range.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A clinical audit was carried out involving patients under VKAs, who needed minor oral surgery procedures, over a period of 18 months. The patient was instructed to not modify or suspend VKAs prior to the intervention. Before surgery, each patient fulfilled a questionnaire on dietary and oral hygiene habits, and a blood sample was collected for INR assessment (cut-off value for surgical procedure ≤3.5).

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled: 69 (56.6%) had an INR value within the established therapeutic range, 53 (43.4%) were out of range. No intra- or postsurgical major bleeding was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

INR, measured on the same day of oral surgery, has the potential to prevent bleeding complications by the identification of those patients out of range, who may require adjusting the drug therapeutic dosage.

Treatment of the Dental Patient with Bleeding Dyscrasias: Etiologies and Management Options for Surgical Success in Practice

The oral health care provider sees a significant number of patients in his or her practice who suffer from systemic diseases affecting the ability to clot. These medical issues can be acquired or inherited bleeding dyscrasias requiring pharmacologic therapy during the perioperative period. Patients with inherited or acquired bleeding disorders require careful attention with respect to the assessment of bleeding risk. This article develops algorithms to manage acquired and inherited bleeding dyscrasias. These approaches include a discussion of the epidemiology of bleeding disorders in surgical patients, mechanism of hemostasis, and strategies for patient management based on the etiology of bleeding disorder.

Anticoagulation Use prior to Common Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review

Currently, the number of patients on oral anticoagulation is increasing. There is a paucity of data regarding maintaining oral anticoagulation (especially novel oral anticoagulants) around the time of specific dental procedures. A dentist has three options: either to stop anticoagulation, to continue it, or to bridge with heparin. A systematic review of 10 clinical trials was conducted to address this issue. It was found that continuing anticoagulation during dental procedures did not increase the risk of bleeding in most trials. Although none of the studies reported a thromboembolic event after interruption of anticoagulation, the follow-up periods were short and inconsistent, and the heightened thromboembolic risk when stopping anticoagulation is well known in the literature. Heparin bridging was associated with an increased bleeding incidence. We recommend maintaining oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists and novel oral anticoagulants for the vast majority of dental procedures along with the use of local hemostatic agents.

Perioperative Management in Patients With Undergoing Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Oral Surgery - A Multicentric Questionnaire Survey

AIM

The purpose of this study was to survey the current opinions of hospitals and medical practices concerning the perioperative management of patients undergoing direct oral anticoagulant therapy (DOAC) and discuss recommendations for the clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire with 13 topics and multiple ordinal-polytomous subitems was designed and sent to 120 Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Austria, Switzerland and Germany, as well as to 85 oral and maxillofacial/oral surgeons in medical offices in Hamburg, Germany. The data were statistically evaluated by Chi-square, Fisher's exact and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests.

RESULTS

The rate of response was 42%. Thirty-seven percent of respondents reported treating over 50 patients per year with undergoing DOAC therapy and only 18% assess a high bleeding risk [33% for vitamin K antagonists (VKA)]. In contrast to that, 62% of respondents would interrupt the DOAC therapy for extraction of one tooth, while 94% would continue VKA therapy. Significantly more clinicians apply suture than those in a medical office. The use of additional hemostatic measures varied between clinic and medical practice. There was a clear request for more detailed guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The study shows the current opinion for perioperative management of patients undergoing DOAC therapy. Multi-centric studies under controlled conditions are needed for a safer treatment of anticoagulated patients as therapy strategies differ greatly between institutions and therefore a complication analysis is hardly possible.

Prevention of post-operative bleeding in hemostatic compromised patients using native porcine collagen fleeces-retrospective study of a consecutive case series

INTRODUCTION

Various anticoagulant therapy regimes bear the risk of postsurgical bleeding events after dental extractions. Local hemostyptic measures, e.g., collagen fleeces, are applied by surgeons to prevent such bleedings. No standard protocol in prevention of bleeding events has met general acceptance among surgeons yet.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine if post-operative bleeding can be prevented by suturing native collagen fleeces into extraction wounds immediately after teeth removal, regardless what anticoagulant regime is performed.

METHODS

A total of 741 extraction units were removed from 200 consecutive in-ward patients with or without alternation of different anticoagulant therapy regimes. Anti-vitamin K agents were the most prescribed drugs (n = 104, 52 %), followed by Acetylsalicylate (ASS) (n = 78, 39 %). Nineteen (9.5 %) patients received a dual anti-platelet therapy. Out of 104 patients receiving an anti-vitamin K agent (phenprocoumon), 84 patients were bridged, 20 patients continued to their anticoagulant therapy without alterations. Following careful tooth extraction, extraction sockets were filled using a native type I and III porcine collagen sponge (Collacone, Botiss Biomaterials, Berlin), supported by single and mattress sutures for local hemostasis. Post-operative bleeding events were rated according to their clinical relevance.

RESULTS

In the post-operative phase, 8 out of 200 consecutively treated patients experienced a post-operative bleeding event. All of them had been designated for a long-term anti-vitamin K therapy (p ≤ 0.05), and extractions were performed under a heparin bridging regime (n = 6) or an uninterrupted anti-vitamin K agent therapy (n = 2). No bleeding events occurred in patients with ASS 100 therapy or low-dose LMWH therapy (p ≤ 0.05), or in patients with dual anti-platelet therapy (0 out of 24). None of the bleeding events put patients' health at risk or required systemic intervention.

CONCLUSION

Sufficiently performed local hemostyptic measures, like the application of collagen fleeces in combination with atraumatic surgery, bears a great potential for preventing heavy bleeding events in hemostatic compromised patients, regardless of their anticoagulant therapy.

Management of anticoagulated patients in implant therapy: a clinical comparative study

OBJECTIVES

This prospective clinical comparative study aimed to analyze the postoperative bleeding risk of patients continuing their anticoagulation therapy (AT) and undergoing implant surgery and bone grafting procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The treatments ranged from the insertion of single or multiple dental implants over implant exposures to sinus floor augmentation and vertical and/or lateral bone grafting with autologous bone grafts. The patients of the test groups (AT groups) were treated with platelet aggregation inhibitors (PAIs), Vitamin-K inhibitors, Vitamin-K inhibitor withdrawal bridged with heparin (LMWH), or new/direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs/DOACs). Patients of the control group were non-anticoagulated (non-AT group). Surgical procedures were performed in the same manner in all groups. Pre, intra, and postoperative data concerning the treatment, extent of the surgery and bleedings was recorded and statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

There were seven postoperative bleedings in 564 patients (1.2%), four in the AT groups (3.4%), and three in the non-AT group (0.6%). No thromboembolic complication occurred in the whole observation period. The invasiveness of the surgical procedure had no statistically significant effect on bleeding frequencies. Patients taking Vitamin-K inhibitors had a significantly higher risk of a postoperative bleeding compared to patients without any AT (P = 0.038). Two patients were hospitalized due to the severity of the bleeding as a precautionary measure (one in the non-AT and one in the PAI group). All bleedings were easily controllable with local hemostatic measures. There was no postoperative bleeding recorded for patients taking DOACs.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation therapy should be continued in patients undergoing implant surgery and bone grafting procedures avoiding thromboembolic complications. Surgeons should always apply the most minimally invasive approach to reduce postoperative risks and be able to apply local hemostatic measures in terms of a bleeding complication.

Assessment of bleeding during minor oral surgical procedures and extraction in patients on anticoagulant therapy

Introduction:

The risk of postoperative hemorrhage from oral surgical procedures has been a concern in the treatment of patients who are receiving long-term anticoagulation therapy. A study undertaken in our institution to address questions about the amount and severity of bleeding associated with minor outpatient oral surgery procedures by assessing bleeding in patients who did not alter their anticoagulant regimen.

Subjects and Methods:

Eighty-three patients receiving long-term anticoagulant therapy visited Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery from May 2010 to October 2011 for extractions and minor oral surgical procedures. Each patient was required to undergo preoperative assessment of prothrombin time (PT) and measurement of the international normalized ratio. Fifty-six patients with preoperative PT values within the therapeutic range 3–4 were included in the study. The patients’ age ranged between 30 and 75 years. Application of surgispon was done following the procedure. Extraction of teeth performed with minimal trauma to the surrounding tissues, the socket margins sutured, and sutures removed after 5 days.

Results:

There was no significant incidence of prolonged or excessive hemorrhage and wound infection and the healing process was normal.

[Retrospective study on bleeding and thromboembolic complications related to tooth extraction, in 93 patients usually treated by antithrombotic therapy]

INTRODUCTION

Tooth extraction for patients treated by AVK and/or platelet aggregation inhibitor is performed according to local habits rather than to a consensus. We had for objective to assess hemorrhagic and thromboembolic risks for patients for whom treatment with AVK and/or platelet aggregation inhibitor was modified before tooth extraction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-three patient files were examined retrospectively. The following data was collected: epidemiological data, ASA score, nature and changes of antithrombotic therapy, preoperative INR, number teeth extracted, postoperative complications (bleeding and thromboembolic events).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were treated with oral anticoagulants, 41 by a platelet aggregation inhibitor, 10 by double platelet aggregation inhibitor therapy, and 5 by an AVK-platelet aggregation inhibitor combination. At D0, the mean INR was decreased to 1.4, 4 patients with high thromboembolic risk had received heparin relay treatment; the treatment was stopped for 9 of the 56 patients on monotherapy with antiplatelet therapy, 4 were switched from clopidogrel to lysine acetylate; clopidogrel was stopped for 7 patients under combination therapy. Seven hundred and twenty-six avulsions (mean 8.1 per patient) were performed, 41 patients presented with mild/moderate bleeding, easily resolved. A patient presented with delayed hemorrhage at D6 (AVK overdose). No thromboembolic complication was reported.

DISCUSSION

The modification of antithrombotic treatment, as for surgery at high risk of bleeding, seems to limit the risk of bleeding without increasing thromboembolic risk.

Oral surgery during therapy with anticoagulants-a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) with vitamin K inhibitors protects the patients from thromboembolic events. It may however lead to excessive hemorrhage during and after an oral surgery procedure. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the justifications to reduce, withdraw, or alter OATs prior to minor oral surgery procedures to manage bleeding events.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic MEDLINE search was conducted for clinical studies in English or German language from 1994 to 2014 comparing patients treated with OAT, without OAT, as well as patients with altered OAT for oral surgery purposes. Relevant outcome parameters were: postoperative local hemostasis, bleeding episodes, occurrence of thromboembolic events, and other complications due to the anticoagulation medication. A hand search for references cited in the identified publications completed the review.

RESULTS

After screening of 1755 abstracts, 16 clinical studies were identified according to the selection criteria. Due to the heterogeneity of the obtained data, aggregation and synthesis were not possible. There was no significant difference in bleeding events comparing patients under continued OAT to those with reduced, altered, and/or discontinued OAT medications. Minor bleeding events in the test and control groups were successfully stopped with local measures. However, no superiority of a single hemostatic measure could be identified. Neither the international normalized ratio (INR), within the therapeutic range (2-4), nor the extent of the minor oral surgery procedure had an influence on postoperative bleeding episodes.

DISCUSSION

There is strong evidence that OAT patients undergoing minor oral surgery should not discontinue their medication in order to prevent thromboembolic complications.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Nonetheless, INR should be less than 4, local hemostatic measures are of high importance and patients need to be instructed and closely monitored as minor bleedings might occur more often in OAT patients.

Safety and cost-effectiveness of bridge therapies for invasive dental procedures in patients with mechanical heart valves

PURPOSE

Bridge anticoagulation therapy is mostly utilized in patients with mechanical heart valves (MHV) receiving warfarin therapy during invasive dental procedures because of the risk of excessive bleeding related to highly vascular supporting dental structures. Bridge therapy using low molecular weight heparin may be an attractive option for invasive dental procedures; however, its safety and cost-effectiveness compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) is uncertain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study investigated the safety and cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin in comparison to UFH for bridge therapy in 165 consecutive patients (57±11 years, 35% men) with MHV who underwent invasive dental procedures.

RESULTS

This study included 75 patients treated with UFH-based bridge therapy (45%) and 90 patients treated with enoxaparin-based bridge therapy (55%). The bleeding risk of dental procedures and the incidence of clinical adverse outcomes were not significantly different between the UFH group and the enoxaparin group. However, total medical costs were significantly lower in the enoxaparin group than in the UFH group (p<0.001). After multivariate adjustment, old age (≥65 years) was significantly associated with an increased risk of total bleeding independent of bridging methods (odds ratio, 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-5.48; p=0.022). Enoxaparin-based bridge therapy (β=-0.694, p<0.001) and major bleeding (β=0.296, p=0.045) were significantly associated with the medical costs within 30 days after dental procedures.

CONCLUSION

Considering the benefit of enoxaparin in cost-effectiveness, enoxaparin may be more efficient than UFH for bridge therapy in patients with MHV who required invasive dental procedures.

Oral surgery for patients on anticoagulant therapy: current thoughts on patient management

Minor oral surgical procedures make up a significant part of the daily practice of dentistry. With the increased sophistication of medical technology and medications there is increased likelihood of performing surgery on patients who are being treated for conditions that require some type of anticoagulant therapy. These patients are at an increased risk for perioperative bleeding or thrombotic complications if anticoagulation is discontinued or the dosage is adjusted. Therefore, a fine balance needs to be obtained and adequate preparation of these patients is the key to establishing this balance. This article reviews suggested approaches to the management of such patients.

A retrospective review of clinical international normalized ratio results and their implications

BACKGROUND

Warfarin is a key element in therapy for atrial fibrillation, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), stroke (cerebrovascular accident) and cardiac valve replacement. Often, patients' warfarin blood levels are not tightly controlled with regard to accepted therapeutic ranges, by virtue of the drug's unpredictable nature.

METHODS

The authors searched 16,017 active clinical charts for active patients of record from the three campuses of the School of Dentistry, Marquette University (MU), Milwaukee, for the years 2009 and 2010. Dental records of 315 patients contained entries including "INR," the abbreviation for the term "international normalized ratio." Only 247 of those records contained an indication of whether the patient's INR values were within therapeutic range. The authors found that 1.96 percent of the total MU dental clinic patient population had a history of warfarin use.

RESULTS

When the authors compared the INR values for patients with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, DVT, stroke and cardiac valve replacement, they found that INR values for 107 of the 247 patients (43.3 percent) were not within therapeutic range for the respective diagnoses. For example, only 50 percent of the patients being treated for atrial fibrillation presented themselves for surgical dental treatment while their INR values were in tight control.

CONCLUSION

The INR values for a significant number of dental patients are not within the therapeutic range for their medical conditions. These patients need to seek follow-up care from their medical care providers.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Screening for INR in the dental office-especially before invasive dental treatment such as periodontal surgery, tooth extraction and dental implant placement-can help prevent postoperative complications. It also can aid the clinician in evaluating whether a patient's INR is within therapeutic range and, subsequently, whether the patient's physician needs to adjust the warfarin dosage.

Bleeding incidence after oral surgery with continued oral anticoagulation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the incidence of postoperative hemorrhage in patients treated with coumarins without interruption of the anticoagulant treatment undergoing oral surgical procedures, mostly osteotomies for tooth removal, when compared with patients who had never been anticoagulated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Six hundred thirty-seven patients underwent 934 oral surgical procedures on an outpatient basis. The INR was measured preoperatively being 2.44 in the mean SD 0.61. Local hemostasis was carried out routinely (80%) with collagen fleece, local flap, and acrylic splint.

RESULTS

Of these 637 patients, 47 presented with a postoperative hemorrhage (7.4%), 15 of these 47 cases had to be treated in hospital (2.4%). All patients showed up finally with a good wound healing, no administration of blood was necessary, and local measures revealed to be sufficient in all cases except for two patients, where the preoperative anticoagulant treatment had to be changed for 6 days. The bleeding incidence in 285 patients with comparable oral surgical procedures, who had never been anticoagulated, was 0.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that oral surgical procedures can be performed safely without alteration of the oral anticoagulant treatment. CINICAL RELEVANCE: Local hemostasis with collagen fleece, local flap, and acrylic splint seems to be sufficient to prevent postoperative bleeding.

Guideline-Discordant Periprocedural Interruptions in Warfarin Therapy

Background—

Periprocedural interruptions in warfarin therapy increase thromboembolic risks to patients and are not indicated for all procedures. We sought to determine the frequency and guideline concordance of periprocedural warfarin interruptions to inform a future educational intervention.

Methods and Results—

In October and November of 2009, an anonymous postal survey was sent to all patients followed for more than 1 year by the University of Michigan Anticoagulation service. Patients were asked how many times in the prior year they were requested to interrupt warfarin therapy for a medical or dental procedure or test and the specific indication for the requested interruption in warfarin therapy. A total of 1686 of 2133 (79%) subjects responded. The mean age of respondents was 69 years (SD=14 years). The majority were men (56%) and white (93%). Atrial fibrillation was the most common indication for warfarin therapy (n=966, 57%). At least 1 request to interrupt warfarin therapy in the prior year was given by 819 of 1648 (50%) respondents, including 481 of the 947 (51%) respondents taking warfarin for atrial fibrillation. Forty-eight percent of requests to interrupt warfarin among all respondents and 50% of requests to interrupt warfarin among those taking warfarin, specifically for atrial fibrillation, were for indications not supported by guideline statements.

Conclusions—

Periprocedural requests to interrupt warfarin therapy are common and are often discordant with current guidelines. Educational interventions may decrease risk of periprocedural thromboembolic complications.

Systemic thrombolysis in ischemic stroke after recent oral surgery and management of oral cavity bleeding

Thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke carries a long list of contraindications. One of these is recent surgery, but the extent of complications after minor surgeries such as dental extraction or oral surgical procedures is unclear. Here, we report the management of 2 cases with accidental bleeding from the oral cavity during systemic thrombolysis in ischemic stroke because of recent unreported oral surgery. Bleeding at the operation site occurred early and was stopped by prompt discontinuation of the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator infusion and local compressive therapy. Patients and relatives may not be aware that surgical procedures within the oral cavity are regarded as minor surgery and should be explicitly asked during the evaluation of ischemic stroke within the period for thrombolysis.

Safety of local anaesthesia in dental patients taking oral anticoagulants: is it still controversial?

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of local infiltration techniques and the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in dental patients taking oral anticoagulants. A total of 352 patients were given a total of 560 injections of local anaesthetic (119 IANB and 441 others). The study group comprised 279 patients with therapeutic international normalised ratios (INRs), and the control group 73 patients who were taking oral anticoagulants but had subtherapeutic INR on the day of operation. Blood was aspirated 7 times (7.3%) during the IANB in the study group. However, there were no clinical signs of prolonged haemorrhage into the medial pterygoid muscle or pterygomandibular space after 96 IANB, including those from whom blood had been aspirated. Only two minor haematomas developed after multiple infiltrations in the lingual sulci. The results suggest that bleeding as a result of the use of local anaesthesia in patients with therapeutic INR is unlikely, provided that the IANB is done correctly.

The dental patient on oral anticoagulant medication: a literature review

Specific diseases and medications may considerably influence the delivery of oral care and the course of dental therapy. The purpose of this literature review is to examine the relationship between oral anticoagulant medication and dental treatment. Electronic and manual searches were conducted for clinical studies in the English literature for the years 1988-2010. The review process provided a total of 110 pertinent literature references, out of which 38 studies dealt with oral anticoagulants and dental treatment. Different treatment strategies relative to dental periprocedural anticoagulation regimens have been identified, and their accompanying thromboembolic and bleeding risks are being presented and discussed. Regarding to what extent a safe and successful dental treatment in patients on anticoagulant medication is feasible, the level of evidence is lacking. Until high-level data are provided, an individualised treatment approach after consultation with the physician of the patient is highly recommended.