Buccal fat pad lifting: an alternative open technique for malar augmentation

Buccal Fat Advancement-Transposition Flap for Reconstruction of Midface Volume Defects

Background: The buccal fat pad (BFP) has previously been utilized for repair of various defects of the head and neck. Objectives: We explore the utility of a pedicled buccal fat advancement-transposition (BFAT) flap in various forms of midface reconstruction through a variety of surgical approaches and characterize its volume and axial reach in human anatomic specimens. Methods: Ten adult full-head human anatomic specimens were dissected, and a single surgical case demonstrating the use of a BFAT flap is described. Results: Nasolabial, subciliary, and deep plane facelift incisions all provided access to the BFP for use as a BFAT flap. The mean volume of mobilizable fat contained within a BFAT flap accessible through external incision was 7.1 cm3. Once fully mobilized, the externalized BFAT flap had a mean axial reach of 6.9 cm without tension. We also present a case illustrating the successful use of a BFAT flap for volumization of a large midface defect secondary to Mohs micrographic surgical resection of a cutaneous malignancy. Discussion: The BFAT flap, which exhibited substantial volume and reach in this study, can be harvested through multiple dissection windows or pre-existing defects and be used to reconstruct a variety of midface defects.

Computer guided maxillo-malar piezoelectric osteotomies for midface augmentation

PURPOSE

Despite maxillo-malar osteotomies having been discarded in the most recent literature, in the setting of orthognathic surgery they provide several advantages for middle third augmentation. This paper reintroduces maxillo-malar osteotomies as an effective method to increase volume of midfacial region in combination with contemporary technology, including piezosurgery, virtual surgical planning, and navigation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with midface hypoplasia were included in this study and underwent orthognathic surgery with maxillo-malar osteotomies. All patients underwent the same workflow: virtual design of maxillo-malar osteotomies, surgery with navigation-assisted piezoelectric osteotomies, and computerized morphometric analysis.

RESULTS

Simulated maxillo-malar osteotomies were successfully replicated in the operating room, as shown by accuracy evaluation performed using three-dimensional analysis. In long-term follow-up period, no permanent complications were assessed. Superimposition between postoperative and preoperative CBCTs revealed that the soft tissue area influenced by the underlying skeletal movement was comparable for all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual surgical planning, navigation, and piezosurgery are today indispensable tools to perform maxillo-malar osteotomies safely and accurately. We suggest incorporating such osteotomies in the surgeon's armamentarium for patients with severe midfacial hypoplasia as they offer an integrated solution to restore functionality and aesthetics.

Use of buccal fat pad-derived stem cells cultured on bioceramics for repair of critical-sized mandibular defects in healthy and osteoporotic rats

OBJECTIVE

To compare new bone formation in mandibular symphysis critical-sized bone defects (CSBDs) in healthy and osteoporotic rats filled with bioceramics (BCs) with or without buccal fat pad mesenchymal stem cells (BFPSCs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two adult female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to two groups (n = 16 per group): group 1 healthy and group 2 osteoporotic (with bilateral ovariectomy). The central portion of the rat mandibular symphysis was used as a physiological CSBD. In each group, eight defects were filled with BC (hydroxyapatite 60% and β-tricalcium phosphate 40%) alone and eight with BFPSCs cultured on BC. The animals were sacrificed at 4 and 8 weeks, and the mandibles were processed for micro-computed tomography to analyze radiological union and bone mineral density (BMD); histological analysis of the bone union; and immunohistochemical analysis, which included immunoreactivity of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2).

RESULTS

In both groups, CSBDs filled with BC + BFPSCs showed greater radiological bone union, BMD and histological bone union, and more VEGF and BMP-2 positivity, compared with CSBDs treated with BC alone at 4 and 8 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of BFPSCs cultured on BCs improves bone regeneration in CSBDs compared with BCs alone in healthy and osteoporotic rats.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our results may aid bone regeneration of maxillofacial CSBDs of both healthy and osteoporotic patients, but further studies are necessary.

Buccal fat pad excision for cheek refinement: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Buccal Fat Pad (BFP) excision has become an aesthetic surgical procedure. Although this procedure is quite common, it is important to bear in mind that the scientific evidence supporting the efficacy of this treatment is scarce and of low quality. The purpose of this systematic review was to analyse all relevant data to assess the efficacy and safety of BFP excision for improving midface aesthetics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A thorough search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. The PICO approach was used where healthy patients seeking cheek slimming and facial silhouette refining undergo BFP excision and were compared before and after surgery in terms of BFP volume reduction, adverse effects and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Of the 1,413 references identified, 4 were included in the qualitative synthesis. Only one study reported BFP volume reduction, which was 3.10 mL (95%CI: 2.38 to 3.80; P < 0.001), and the mean volume of the excised tissue was 2.74 ± 0.69 mL (range, 1.8-4.9 mL). 84.6% of the patients stated that their facial contour was much better and the remaining 15.4% noticed that the appearance of their cheeks following BFP excision was better. Seven complications were reported in the 134 cheek refinement procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

BFP removal has an initially favorable outcome for facial aesthetics and a low postoperative complication rate, however, there are many procedures being performed with poor quality methodology and there is also a lack of published data on its long-term follow-up results.

Buccal Fat Pad Excision: Hydrodissection Technique

BACKGROUND

Buccal fat pad (BFP) excision is a procedure in which the fat pad is extracted in order to achieve a more youthful appearance.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe an alternative technique that utilizes hydrodissection to extract the BFP.

METHODS

This is a controlled, prospective, randomized clinical study involving 2 groups. Group A (n = 27) underwent BFP excision with hydrodissection, during which 15 mL of a vasoconstricting anesthetic solution was injected into the BFP. Group B (n = 27) underwent BFP excision, during which 3 mL of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine was injected. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. Variables analyzed were surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative pain directly following surgery 2 hours after the procedure, as well as maximum pain within 72 hours of surgery and complications. Postoperative care was standardized, and patient follow-up extended over a 6-month period.

RESULTS

Pain scores for 54 patients were recorded on a visual analog scale (0-10). Mean ± standard deviation transoperative pain scores were 0.5 ± 0.8 for Group A and 1.3 ± 1.3 for Group B (P = 0.01); 2 hours postoperation the scores were 1.2 ± 0.7 for Group A and 2.6 ± 1 for Group B (P < 0.0001). Maximum pain occurred within 72 hours, and scored 1.6 ± 0.6 for Group A and 3.1 ± 1 for Group B (P < 0.0001). Mean operative time was 8:18 ± 0:47 minutes for Group A and 14:08 ± 2:28 minutes for Group B (P < 0.0001). There was a positive correlation between operative time and pain. Overall, 5.5% of patients suffered postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

BFP excision by hydrodissection is an effective procedure that decreases surgical times by facilitating extraction of the BFP with less manipulation, thereby resulting in decreased postoperative pain and a more tolerable recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2