The effect of combined surgical-medical intervention on the progression of endometriosis in an adolescent and young adult population

Medical Management of Endometriosis in Adolescent and Young Adult Women: A Review of 91 Cases of Biopsy-Confirmed Endometriosis

OBJECTIVES

To characterise contemporary trends in the hormonal management of endometriosis in adolescent and young adult patients with biopsy-proven endometriosis.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of women aged 14-25 years who underwent laparoscopy for pelvic pain with biopsy-proven endometriosis between January 2011 and September 2020 at an academic tertiary hospital system. The final sample included 91 patients with biopsy-confirmed endometriosis.

RESULTS

Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) were the most common initial treatment (64% of patients). Progestin-only formulations (low- and high-dose norethindrone acetate) were offered to younger patients (age 15.9 ± 2.7 years) than those offered COCs (19.9 ± 3.3 years) and levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (LNG-IUDs) (21.9 ± 1.7 years). Current treatments varied widely and included COCs (32%), LNG-IUDs (18%), oral progestins (low- and high-dose norethindrone, medroxyprogesterone) (14%), elagolix (9%), and leuprolide (8%). Oral adjuncts to LNG-IUD were common: usually low- or high-dose norethindrone (37% of patients with an LNG-IUD), but also included progesterone, COCs, and elagolix.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral progestins, LNG-IUDs, and COCs were the mainstay of initial treatment. Subsequent treatments varied widely and included COCs, LNG-IUDs, oral progestins, elagolix, leuprolide, and combinations of these agents. We observed that most young women switched between therapies, suggesting that a personalised approach is often used to determine treatment plans among the wide range of options currently available. This study helps define the spectrum of treatment regimens for endometriosis in adolescent females.

Surgical Considerations in the Management of Adolescent Endometriosis-An Expert Commentary

Given the complexities and controversies that exist in diagnosing adult endometriosis, as well as optimizing medical and surgical management, it is not surprising that there is even more ambiguity and inconsistency in the optimal surgical care of endometriosis in the adolescent. This collaborative commentary aimed to provide evidence-based recommendations optimizing the role of surgical interventions for endometriosis in the adolescent patient with input from experts in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery, pediatric and adolescent gynecology, and infertility/reproductive medicine.

Plasma microRNA expression in adolescents and young adults with endometriosis: the importance of hormone use

Introduction

Prior studies have investigated the diagnostic potential of microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles for endometriosis. However, the vast majority of previous studies have only included adult women. Therefore, we sought to investigate differential expression of miRNAs among adolescents and young adults with endometriosis.

Methods

The Women's Health Study: from Adolescence to Adulthood (A2A) is an ongoing WERF EPHect compliant longitudinal cohort. Our analysis included 64 patients with surgically-confirmed endometriosis (96% rASRM stage I/II) and 118 females never diagnosed with endometriosis frequency matched on age (median = 21 years) and hormone use at blood draw. MicroRNA measurement was separated into discovery (10 cases and 10 controls) and internal replication (54 cases and 108 controls) phases. The levels of 754 plasma miRNAs were assayed in the discovery phase using PCR with rigorous internal control measures, with the relative expression of miRNA among cases vs. controls calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method. miRNAs that were significant in univariate analyses stratified by hormone use were included in the internal replication phase. The internal replication phase was split 2:1 into a training and testing set and utilized FirePlex miRNA assay to assess 63 miRNAs in neural network analyses. The testing set of the validation phase was utilized to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) of the best fit models from the training set including hormone use as a covariate.

Results

In the discovery phase, 49 miRNAs were differentially expressed between endometriosis cases and controls. The associations of the 49 miRNAs differed by hormone use at the time of blood draw. Neural network analysis in the testing set of the internal replication phase determined a final model comprising 5 miRNAs (miR-542-3p, let-7b-3p, miR-548i, miR-769-5p, miR-30c-1-3p), yielding AUC = 0.77 (95% CI: 0.67-0.87, p < 0.001). Sensitivity in the testing dataset improved (83.3% vs. 72.2%) while the specificity decreased (58.3% vs. 72.2%) compared to the training set.

Conclusion

The results suggest that miR-542-3p, let-7b-3p, miR-548i, miR-769-5p, miR-30c-1-3p may be dysregulated among adolescent and young adults with endometriosis. Hormone use was a significant modifier of miRNA dysregulation and should be considered rigorously in miRNA diagnostic studies.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of adjuvant gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) on pregnancy outcomes in women with endometriosis following conservative surgery

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis frequently results in pain and infertility. While conservative surgery offers some relief, it often falls short of ensuring satisfactory pregnancy outcomes. Adjuvant GnRH-a is administered post-surgery to mitigate recurrence; however, its impact on pregnancy outcomes remains debated. This study endeavors to assess the efficacy of adjuvant GnRH-a in enhancing pregnancy outcomes post-conservative surgery in endometriosis patients.

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Medline (Ovid), Web of Science, and Scopus were rigorously searched up to 02 August 2023, without linguistic constraints. Identified articles were screened using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Evaluated outcomes encompassed pregnancy rate, live birth rate, miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, mean postoperative pregnancy interval, recurrence rate, and adverse reaction rate. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Jadad score evaluated the included studies' quality. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis were implemented to analyze the pooled results. A meta-analysis model expressed results as standardized mean difference (SMD) and Risk ratio (RR).

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies about 2485 patients were assimilated. Meta-analysis revealed that post-surgery, the GnRH-a cohort experienced a marginally elevated pregnancy rate (RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.02-1.41; P = 0.03) and a reduced mean time to conceive (RR = -1.17, 95% CI = -1.70- -0.64; P < 0.0001). Contrarily, other evaluated outcomes did not exhibit notable statistical differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating adjuvant GnRH-a following conservative surgery may be deemed beneficial for women with endometriosis, especially before Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Nonetheless, owing to pronounced heterogeneity, subsequent research is warranted to substantiate these potential advantages conclusively.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023448280.

Trends in pelvic pain symptoms over 2 years of follow-up among adolescents and young adults with and without endometriosis

ABSTRACT

We described trends in pelvic pain characteristics over 2 years of follow-up among adolescents and adults with and without endometriosis participating in the longitudinal observational cohort of the Women's Health Study: From Adolescence to Adulthood, using data reported at baseline and at years 1 and 2 of follow-up. Participants completed a questionnaire at baseline (between November 2012 and May 2019) and annually thereafter that included validated measures of severity, frequency, and life interference of dysmenorrhea, acyclic pelvic pain, and dyspareunia. Our study population included 620 participants with surgically confirmed endometriosis (rASRM stage I/II = 95%) and 671 community-based and hospital-based controls, with median age = 19 and 24 years, respectively. The proportion reporting hormone use varied across the 3 years ranging from 88% to 92% for cases and 56% to 58% for controls. At baseline, endometriosis cases were more likely to report severe, frequent, and life-interfering dysmenorrhea, acyclic pelvic pain, and dyspareunia compared with controls. Among cases, frequency and severity of dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia were relatively static across 2 years. However, acyclic pelvic pain improved. Severe acyclic pain decreased from 69% at baseline to 46% at year 2. Daily pain decreased from 28% to 14%, and life interference from 68% to 38%. Trends among controls remained fairly stable across 2 years. Among endometriosis cases who completed the questionnaire at all 3 time points, 18% reported persistent, severe acyclic pelvic pain at all 3 time points. Over time, different trends were observed by pelvic pain type among endometriosis cases and controls, supporting the importance of assessing multidimensional features of pelvic pain.

ESHRE guideline: endometriosis

STUDY QUESTION

How should endometriosis be diagnosed and managed based on the best available evidence from published literature?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The current guideline provides 109 recommendations on diagnosis, treatments for pain and infertility, management of disease recurrence, asymptomatic or extrapelvic disease, endometriosis in adolescents and postmenopausal women, prevention and the association with cancer.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Endometriosis is a chronic condition with a plethora of presentations in terms of not only the occurrence of lesions, but also the presence of signs and symptoms. The most important symptoms include pain and infertility.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

The guideline was developed according to the structured methodology for development of ESHRE guidelines. After formulation of key questions by a group of experts, literature searches and assessments were performed. Papers published up to 1 December 2020 and written in English were included in the literature review.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

Based on the collected evidence, recommendations were formulated and discussed within specialist subgroups and then presented to the core guideline development group (GDG) until consensus was reached. A stakeholder review was organized after finalization of the draft. The final version was approved by the GDG and the ESHRE Executive Committee.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

This guideline aims to help clinicians to apply best care for women with endometriosis. Although studies mostly focus on women of reproductive age, the guideline also addresses endometriosis in adolescents and postmenopausal women. The guideline outlines the diagnostic process for endometriosis, which challenges laparoscopy and histology as gold standard diagnostic tests. The options for treatment of endometriosis-associated pain symptoms include analgesics, medical treatments and surgery. Non-pharmacological treatments are also discussed. For management of endometriosis-associated infertility, surgical treatment and/or medically assisted reproduction are feasible. While most of the more recent studies confirm previous ESHRE recommendations, there are five topics in which significant changes to recommendations were required and changes in clinical practice are to be expected.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The guideline describes different management options but, based on existing evidence, no firm recommendations could be formulated on the most appropriate treatments. Also, for specific clinical issues, such as asymptomatic endometriosis or extrapelvic endometriosis, the evidence is too scarce to make evidence-based recommendations.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The guideline provides clinicians with clear advice on best practice in endometriosis care, based on the best evidence currently available. In addition, a list of research recommendations is provided to stimulate further studies in endometriosis.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The guideline was developed and funded by ESHRE, covering expenses associated with the guideline meetings, with the literature searches and with the dissemination of the guideline. The guideline group members did not receive payments. C.M.B. reports grants from Bayer Healthcare and the European Commission; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with ObsEva (Data Safety Monitoring Group) and Myovant (Scientific Advisory Group). A.B. reports grants from FEMaLE executive board member and European Commission Horizon 2020 grant; consulting fees from Ethicon Endo Surgery, Medtronic; honoraria for lectures from Ethicon; and support for meeting attendance from Gedeon Richter; A.H. reports grants from MRC, NIHR, CSO, Roche Diagnostics, Astra Zeneca, Ferring; Consulting fees from Roche Diagnostics, Nordic Pharma, Chugai and Benevolent Al Bio Limited all paid to the institution; a pending patent on Serum endometriosis biomarker; he is also Chair of TSC for STOP-OHSS and CERM trials. O.H. reports consulting fees and speaker's fees from Gedeon Richter and Bayer AG; support for attending meetings from Gedeon-Richter, and leadership roles at the Finnish Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Nordic federation of the societies of obstetrics and gynecology. L.K. reports consulting fees from Gedeon Richter, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Dr KADE/Besins, Palleos Healthcare, Roche, Mithra; honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Dr KADE/Besins, Palleos Healthcare, Roche, Mithra; support for attending meetings from Gedeon Richter, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Dr KADE/Besins, Palleos Healthcare, Roche, Mithra; he also has a leadership role in the German Society of Gynecological Endocrinology (DGGEF). M.K. reports grants from French Foundation for Medical Research (FRM), Australian Ministry of Health, Medical Research Future Fund and French National Cancer Institute; support for meeting attendance from European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), European Congress on Endometriosis (EEC) and ESHRE; She is an advisory Board Member, FEMaLe Project (Finding Endometriosis Using Machine Learning), Scientific Committee Chair for the French Foundation for Research on Endometriosis and Scientific Committee Chair for the ComPaRe-Endometriosis cohort. A.N. reports grants from Merck SA and Ferring; speaker fees from Merck SA and Ferring; support for meeting attendance from Merck SA; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board with Nordic Pharma and Merck SA; she also is a board member of medical advisory board, Endometriosis Society, the Netherlands (patients advocacy group) and an executive board member of the World Endometriosis Society. E.S. reports grants from National Institute for Health Research UK, Rosetrees Trust, Barts and the London Charity; Royalties from De Gruyter (book editor); consulting fees from Hologic; speakers fees from Hologic, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Intuitive, Olympus and Karl Storz; Participation in the Medicines for Women's Health Expert Advisory Group with Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA); he is also Ambassador for the World Endometriosis Society. C.T. reports grants from Merck SA; Consulting fees from Gedeon Richter, Nordic Pharma and Merck SA; speaker fees from Merck SA, all paid to the institution; and support for meeting attendance from Ferring, Gedeon Richter and Merck SA. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

DISCLAIMER

This guideline represents the views of ESHRE, which were achieved after careful consideration of the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. In the absence of scientific evidence on certain aspects, a consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders has been obtained. Adherence to these clinical practice guidelines does not guarantee a successful or specific outcome, nor does it establish a standard of care. Clinical practice guidelines do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type. ESHRE makes no warranty, express or implied, regarding the clinical practice guidelines and specifically excludes any warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular use or purpose (Full disclaimer available at www.eshre.eu/guidelines.).

The Prevalence of Endometriosis in Adolescents with Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Endometriosis is a recognized cause of pelvic pain in adolescents with menstrual symptoms that significantly affect education, activity, and social interactions. We aim to provide an updated systematic review of the prevalence of endometriosis in adolescents with pelvic pain presenting for gynecological investigation.

DATA SOURCES

We searched Medline, Embase, and Cinahl from 2011 to July 2019.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We included cohort studies of adolescents with pelvic pain undergoing gynecological investigation. Two authors independently selected studies and extracted study characteristics and prevalence data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program for cohort studies.

RESULTS

This updated systematic review evaluated a total of 19 studies including 1243 symptomatic adolescents. In all, 648 of 1011 (64%) adolescents undergoing laparoscopy were found to have endometriosis. The prevalence ranged from 25% to 100%, with a mean prevalence of 64%. Thirteen studies including 381 participants categorized disease severity using the revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine classification. Among these, 53% of participants (201/381) had stage I, 28% (105/381) had stage II, 20% (76/381) had stage III, and 13% (49/381) had stage IV disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of endometriosis among adolescents with pelvic pain symptoms is high. Endometriosis is treatable, and prompt recognition will help to ensure that adolescents are signposted earlier to appropriate specialists. The management of adolescents with suspected endometriosis should be consistent with best practice guidance. Despite recommendations to increase the awareness and knowledge of endometriosis in adolescence, minimal research has followed.

Dysmenorrhea, Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain in Adolescents

Most adolescents will experience discomfort during menstruation. Due to normalization of dysmenorrhea, there is delay to diagnosis and treatment. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatories are a first line treatment. Adolescents can safely be offered menstrual suppression with combined hormonal contraception, and progestin-only options. When the above are ineffective, gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists with add back treatment can be considered. Transabdominal ultrasound is indicated when first line treatments do not improve symptoms. Endometriosis should be considered in adolescents who experience ongoing pain despite medical treatment. If laparoscopy is performed and endometriosis visualized, it should be treated with either excision or ablation. Women with endometriosis should be counselled on menstrual suppression until fertility is desired. Management of chronic pain requires the involvement of a multi-disciplinary team.

Endometriosis and pain in the adolescent- striking early to limit suffering: A narrative review

Endometriosis, a condition in which uterine tissue grows outside the uterus, is a debilitating disease, affecting millions of women and costing the United States approximately $78 billion annually in pain- related disability. It is also the leading cause of chronic pelvic pain (CPP), which is often unresponsive to existing treatments. Adolescent women with the disease are at particular risk as there are often significant diagnostic delays, which in turn can exacerbate pain. Research and treatment guidelines for adolescents with endometriosis are largely based on studies for adult women due to the limited number of studies focusing on adolescents. The current paper critically reviews the literature as it pertains to endometriosis pathophysiology, mechanisms contributing to CPP, and treatment implications and recommendations with a focus on gaps related to adolescents.

Surgical Management of Superficial Peritoneal Adolescent Endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Adolescent endometriosis typically presents as stage I with superficial peritoneal disease and less commonly as stage III or IV with deeply infiltrative disease. Endometriosis lesions can be destroyed (cautery or laser), cutting out the discrete lesion with excision and destroyed, or radically excised with removal of the lesion and surrounding tissue. It has been shown to be beneficial to excise deeply infiltrative disease to improve pain. Radical excision has been promoted by a subset of surgeons and involves removal of large areas of peritoneum with the promise/proposal of a cure and suggestion of no need for medical suppression of endometriosis. The best technique to manage superficial peritoneal disease has not yet been defined.

CASE

A 15-year-old young woman with a history of 2 previous laparoscopies for pain and an ovarian cyst who underwent removal of a mucinous cystadenoma, presented to a local gynecologist with chronic pelvic pain. She underwent a third laparoscopy and was found to have superficial peritoneal endometriosis and filmy adhesions believed to be due to the previous ovarian surgery. The endometriosis was surgically destroyed with the use of cautery and the filmy adhesions were lysed. Months later she had a return of pain and was advised to have a fourth laparoscopy with radical excision by an "excisionalist" gynecologist. She was found to have superficial peritoneal disease with ASRM-defined stage I endometriosis and underwent radical excision of the peritoneum of the anterior cul de sac, posterior cul de sac, and both pelvic side walls. She was informed that she had been cured of her endometriosis and was thus not treated with postoperative hormonal suppression. Her pain did not improve and in fact worsened after the radical excisional surgery. She self-referred for care. She started menstrual suppression treatment with continuous estrogen/progestin therapy for medical treatment of endometriosis but after 6 months she was still having severe pain without bleeding. Eight months after the radical excisional surgery she elected to have a fifth laparoscopy to address potential adhesions. At that time she was found to have extensive pelvic adhesions with the uterus adherent to the anterior cul de sac, and adhesions in the posterior cul de sac. In addition, both ovaries were involved with adhesions and adherent to the pelvic side walls. She was found to have clear and red lesions of superficial peritoneal endometriosis. She underwent a lysis of adhesions, and excision of lesions, and destruction of endometriosis. Her pain improved postoperatively; menstrual suppression was continued and she has remained with a continued excellent quality of life with over 2 years of follow-up.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

For this patient, radical excisional surgery resulted in increased pain and extensive adhesion formation. It was not curative because endometriosis was documented on follow-up surgery. In a previously published long-term follow-up report of adolescents with recurrent pain 2-10 years after destruction of superficial peritoneal disease, it was reported that there were no increased adhesions and no trend toward disease progression. Excisional gynecologists who perform this procedure should not suggest that radical excisional surgery is helpful and without increased risk, until studies have shown long-term benefit in the surgical management of superficial peritoneal endometriosis.

Endometriosis in adolescents

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current article addresses recent literature regarding the diagnosis and management of endometriosis in adolescents.

RECENT FINDINGS

An increasing body of literature suggests that advanced-stage endometriosis (revised scoring system of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Stage III or IV) and deeply invasive endometriosis are relatively common in adolescents. There remains limited data on the efficacy of postoperative hormonal management of endometriosis in the adolescent population.

SUMMARY

Strong consideration should be made for surgical diagnosis of endometriosis in adolescents with pelvic pain, including noncyclic pain, with a concurrent family history of endometriosis and personal history of atopic disease. More research is needed regarding the benefits of the routine use of hypoestrogenic and other hormonal agents in the prevention of disease progression and long-term sequela in adolescents with endometriosis.

A focus on the distinctions and current evidence of endometriosis in adolescents

Endometriosis (EM) occurring in adolescents presents distinct clinical and histologic characteristics compared to the disease in women. Because the symptoms of EM are nonspecific, often overlapping with those experienced in a range of gynecological and gastrointestinal conditions, the process of reaching a diagnosis of EM is often delayed. The diagnosis of EM is suspected depending on the history and the symptoms and signs, is corroborated by physical examination and imaging techniques, and is finally proved by histological examination of specimens collected during laparoscopy. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to make strong recommendations for management in adolescents who may have EM. This short report reviews some peculiarities of EM in adolescents and provides an update of recent knowledge of the diagnosis and treatment of EM. We hope that the present contribution may help to bring more attention to the clinical diagnosis of EM and consequently aid in decreasing diagnostic delay.

Peculiar Aspects of Endometriosis in Adolescents

Although documented rates of endometriosis in adolescent patients undergoing laparoscopy for chronic pelvic pain range from about 25% to 45%, adolescent endometriosis has received limited attention in terms of research activity and follow-up studies. In this manuscript, distinctive characteristics of adolescent and young endometriosis have been considered in order to define pathogenetic and scientific concepts that might be useful in clarifying some aspects of the adult disease as well. Some highlights relative to the cellular origin of the disease can be derived from reported cases before menarche, from the appearance of endometriotic lesions in teenagers (mostly stage I-II endometriosis), and from the relative infrequency of ovarian endometriotic cysts in this population. Adolescents and young patients might be also particularly useful for studying the natural course of the disease. To this end, clinical manifestations and recurrence patterns of the disease in adolescent patients need to be elucidated. Differences in clinical aspects of the disease between the adult and young populations are presented. Risk of recurrence and potential risk factors involved in the reappearance of the disease in teenagers are completely unknown. (Journal of Endometriosis 2010; 2: 19–25)

Trauma and endometriosis. A review. May we explain surgical phenotypes and natural history of the disease?

OBJECTIVE

The study was performed to evaluate whether trauma is an initial event of development of endometriosis.

METHOD

Using Medline database from January 1960 up to December 2014, a systematic review was made of all published studies using the keywords trauma, healing, injury, infection, hyperperistaltism, stretch and endometriosis, adenomyosis and trauma. Studies and review articles written in French and/or in English related to the topic were included and reviewed independently by two authors.

RESULTS

The role of trauma is well-established for endometriotic lesions diagnosed in surgical scars. Various traumas including delivery, uterine curettage or incision, intraperitoneal hemorrhage, or occult pelvic inflammatory diseases could be involved to explain other localizations of the disease. Many data suggested that the healing process, particularly growth factors and the associated estrogen production, may facilitate the implantation and the growth of ectopic endometrial cells. After the initial, a traumatic event, the phenotype of the disease would depend on the tissue in which the endometriotic lesion grows.

CONCLUSIONS

The present literature review may support a potential role of a trauma as an initial event of endometriosis.

Endometriosis in Adolescents: A Systematic Review

Introduction

The aim of this manuscript is to present a systematic review of characteristics and management of endometriosis in adolescents in order to gain some relevant insight into the most appropriate clinical management of the disease.

Methods

The literature review was done using electronic database PubMed focusing on the terms ‘adolescents’, ‘endometriosis’, ‘teenagers’, ‘pain’, ‘infertility’, ‘quality of life’, ‘medical’ and ‘surgical management’ from 1980 onward and was limited to articles in English. Articles were only included if they reported original relevant research.

Results

The 24 studies selected for review included 1148 adolescents with laparoscopic proven endometriosis. The diagnosis of endometriosis was histologically confirmed in 39.02% (448/1148) of cases. The results from trials have been tabulated and main results presented in a question and answer format.

Conclusions

The majority of adolescent girls with chronic pelvic pain not responding to conventional medical therapy have endometriosis (up to 80%). Laparoscopy with biopsy is the only way to diagnose endometriosis in the adolescent population, and depends on recognition of atypical manifestations of the disease. Surgical management (especially by an expert surgeon) has been shown to be beneficial in reducing pain, improving infertility, and preventing progression or recurrence of disease. Postoperative hormonal suppression helps reduce pain symptoms and recurrence of endometriomas, but it does not seem to prevent disease recurrence or progression of peritoneal endometriosis, and has not been shown to improve future fertility. Postoperative suppression until pregnancy is based on expert opinion only. There is a need for good quality properly randomized trials.

Current methods for the management of endometriosis in adolescent patients

Endometriosis is increasingly recognized as a challenging problem of both diagnosis and management in adolescent gynecology. Areas covered: This special report summarizes the current practices in the evaluation and management of endometriosis in adolescent patients. Expert commentary: We recommend prompt recognition and treatment of endometriosis whenever possible. Management should begin with empiric treatment with NSAIDS and hormonal therapy if complaints of pain interfering with daily activities are elicited. If a patient fails medical therapy after three to six months, surgical intervention is warranted by a clinician experienced in operating in this age range and familiar with the appearance of endometriosis in this age range.

Laparoscopic Outcomes for Pelvic Pathology in Children and Adolescents among Patients Presenting to the Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Service

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical indications, outcomes, and common pelvic pathologies presenting to the Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology service in premenarcheal (PMF) and menarcheal females (MF) undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review.

SETTING

An academic children's hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Females under 21 years of age, excluding pregnant patients, who underwent laparoscopic surgery for a gynecologic indication presenting to the Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology service at a single children's hospital between July 2007 and January 2012, identified by CPT codes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pertinent patient demographics, indication for surgery, anesthesia time, estimated blood loss, surgical instruments used, intra-operative findings, surgical pathology, complications, length of stay, and concerns at follow-up appointment. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses of data were performed using SAS 9.3.

RESULTS

Of 158 cases meeting inclusion criteria, 33 patients were PMF (mean age 8.6 ± 3.2 years) and 125 patients were MF (mean age 14.7 ± 2.3 years). Acute abdominal pain was the most common surgical indication in both groups, but was significantly more likely to be the surgical indication in the PMF group (62.7% vs. 52.8%, P = .006). Adnexal torsion was more likely to be present in the PMF group than in the MF group (66.7% vs. 27.2%, P < .0001). No complications were reported in the PMF group. Two minor complications were reported in the MF group.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive surgical techniques represent a safe and well-tolerated method for treating a wide variety of pelvic pathology in both younger children and older adolescent females. For physicians evaluating premenarcheal females with acute-onset abdominal pain, adnexal torsion should be prominent among the differential diagnoses.

The approach to chronic pelvic pain in the adolescent

Adolescents present to outpatient and acute care settings commonly for evaluation and treatment of chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Primary care providers, gynecologists, pediatric and general surgeons, emergency department providers, and other specialists should be familiar with both gynecologic and nongynecologic causes of CPP so as to avoid delayed diagnoses and potential adverse sequelae. Treatment may include medications, surgery, physical therapy, trigger-point injections, psychological counseling, and complementary/alternative medicine. Additional challenges arise in caring for this patient population because of issues of confidentiality, embarrassment surrounding the history or examination, and combined parent-child decision making.

Adolescent Endometriosis: Report of a Series of 55 Cases With a Focus on Clinical Presentation and Long-Term Issues

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To report the clinical presentation and long-term issues of adolescent endometriosis.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single private clinical center, Bordeaux, France.

PATIENTS

Adolescents with a confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis.

INTERVENTIONS

Surgical excision or ablation or lesions performed at laparoscopy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-five adolescents, ages from 12 to 19 years (mean age 17.8), who were diagnosed with endometriosis from March 1998 to April 2013 were included in the study. Pain of various types was the leading symptom in all patients, except 2. Twenty-three patients had an adnexal mass identified preoperatively, and 5 had an associated infertility issue at the time of diagnostic laparoscopy. Four patients had an associated genital malformation. Fifty-one percent of the patients had a history of appendectomy. A familial history of endometriosis was reported by 19 patients (34.5%), with a first-degree relative affected in 14 cases (25.45%), and 47.3% of patients were smoking at least 5 cigarettes a day. Superficial implants was encountered in 31 cases (56.4%), endometriomas in 18 cases (32.72%), and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) in 6 cases (10.90%). Sixty percent of patients were scored as stages I to II and 40% as stages III to IV. Five patients were lost to follow-up, and 37 had a follow-up ranging from 36 to 315 months (mean follow-up 125.5 months). Among the 50 patients not lost to follow-up, 13 (26%) had either no pain, or improved and had acceptable pain with medical treatment. Seventeen patients of the 50 adolescents not lost to follow-up (34%) underwent a repeat laparoscopy. A subsequent laparoscopic and/or magnetic resonance imaging scan was performed in 35 patients because of persistent pain. Among these, there was 12 endometriomas (7 recurrences) and 12 DIEs (3 recurrences), giving recurrence rates for endometriomas and DIEs of 36.84% and 50%, respectively. During the study, 18 patients wished to have a child. Thirteen had a delivery (72.2%), and 9 pregnancies occurred in patients who initially presented with stage I to II endometriosis. Of the 11 patients who had subfertility, 6 successfully conceived (54.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescent endometriosis is not a rare condition. In our study a familial history was reported in more than one-third of patients. Among those patients treated for DIE, there was a trend for higher rates of recurrences (symptoms or lesions) that required repeat laparoscopy. However, the impact on subsequent fertility appeared to have been limited.

Advanced stage endometriosis in adolescents and young women

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence and characteristics of advanced stage endometriosis in adolescents and young women treated in a tertiary referral center.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

86 adolescents and young women (≤22 y) who underwent surgery for endometriosis. The operative reports were reviewed for endometriosis stage, surgical findings, surgical procedures, and pathology.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Endometriosis stage reported according to the revised American Fertility Society classification.

RESULTS

Early stage endometriosis (stage I or II) was found in 66 (76%) and advanced stage endometriosis (stage III or IV) in 20 (23%). The surgical findings in the 20 patients with advanced stage endometriosis included ovarian endometriomas in 14 cases, rectovaginal nodule in 1 case, and diaphragmatic and pulmonary endometriosis in 1 case. Women with advanced stage endometriosis were found to be slightly older at time of diagnosis than those with early stage disease (mean age 20.4 ± 1.4 y vs 18.7 ± 2.2 y respectively, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In adolescents and young women with endometriosis, advanced stage disease is not uncommon. The main presentation of advanced stage endometriosis in this age group is ovarian endometriomas rather than extensive peritoneal or adhesive disease.

Endometriosis and the Enigmatic Question of Progression

Aims

The aim of this study was to identify whether endometriosis is a progressive disease with age, and to review the literature on this topic.

Material and methods

The incidence of endometriosis in a cohort of 500 women who underwent laparoscopy between 2003 and 2013 in the Greenville Health System, in South Carolina, United States, was reviewed. The search of the world literature on progression of endometriosis was limited to 1980 and beyond.

Results

The correlation between stage of endometriosis and age was found to be small (r = −0.04; 95% CI, −0.13 to 0.04; p = 0.3; n = 471). The literature search identified 16 studies on adults. Progression of endometriosis findings at laparoscopy occurred in 31% of the cases with follow-up (n = 162).

Conclusions

Endometriosis of minimal or mild American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) classification stage is equally likely to be present in women of all ages; similarly, endometriosis in its severe form is not age-dependent.

Systematic review of endometriosis pain assessment: how to choose a scale?

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies concerning endometriosis and pain have been reported. However, there is no consensus on the best method to evaluate pain in endometriosis and many scales have been used. Moreover, there are only a few descriptions of minimal clinically important differences after treatment (MCID) to evaluate variations in pain. In our study, we aim to identify pain scales used in endometriosis pain treatment, to address their strong and weak points and to define which would be the ideal scale to help clinicians and researchers to evaluate endometriosis-related pain.

METHODS

A search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was carried out for publications in English, French or Portuguese from 1980 to December 2012, for the words: endometriosis, treatment, pain. Studies were selected if they studied an endometriosis treatment and a pain scale was specified. A quantitative and a qualitative analysis of each scale was performed to define strong and weak points of each scale (systematic registration number: CRD42013005336).

RESULTS

A total of 736 publications were identified. After excluding duplications and applying inclusion criteria 258 studies remained. We found that the visual analog scale (VAS) is the most frequently used scale. Both VAS and the numerical rating scale (NRS) show a good balance between strong and weak points in comparison with others such as the Biberoglu and Behrman scale. Concerning MCID, only VAS, NRS and Brief Pain Inventory scales have reported MCID and, among these, only VAS MCID has been studied in endometriosis patients (VAS MCID = 10 mm). Adding the Clinical Global Impression score (CGI) to the pain scale allows calculation of the MCID.

CONCLUSIONS

When using pain scales their strengths and weaknesses must be known and included in the analysis. VAS is the most frequently used pain scale and, together with NRS, seems the best adapted for endometriosis pain measurement. The use of VAS or NRS for each type of typical pain related to endometriosis (dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia and non-menstrual chronic pelvic pain), combined with the CGI and a quality-of-life scale will provide both clinicians and researchers with tools to evaluate treatment response.

Adolescent Endometriosis: Review of Clinical Presentation and Long-Term Issues

Endometriosis may affect adolescent girls. The scientific literature on endometriosis in adolescents is limited, and many aspects are still uncertain despite a growing number of related reports. The prevalence of endometriosis in adolescents is unknown, but in selected groups of patients undergoing laparoscopy, it has been found to be higher than 50%. The physiopathology of adolescent endometriosis has not been specifically shown. However, the presence of a family history and associated genital malformations are more frequently identified in adolescents with endometriosis. The clinical presentation of the disease in adolescents has been assessed by numerous prospective and retrospective studies, and the risk factors for the development of endometriosis are well-known. The recommended diagnostic strategy is actually well-characterized, even if an early diagnosis is hardly ever made. The therapeutic management is also more consensual, but not definitive because of a lack of prospective studies evaluating either short- or long-term results and the impact on the natural history of the disease. Finally, the long-term sequelae are still a burden, and many questions are unanswered, despite new insights provided by a few recent reports evaluating the progression of the disease and its effects on subsequent fertility. Further studies are needed to better assess these issues.

The utility of transrectal ultrasound in adolescents when transabdominal or transvaginal ultrasound is not feasible

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To present the indications and diagnosis in adolescents undergoing transrectal ultrasound (RU).

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

PARTICIPANTS

Adolescents presenting to gynecology clinic between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2012.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Detection of RU, transvaginal, and transabdominal (AU) ultrasound indications, and final diagnosis.

RESULTS

The main indications for RU were menstrual abnormalities, pelvic pain-dysmenorrhea, and vulvovaginitis. When compared according to final diagnosis adolescents with vulvovaginitis (13.9%) and amenorrhea (8.3%) were evaluated more with RU.

CONCLUSION

RU is highly acceptable and it provides images superior to AU. It can be used in adolescents to visualize the pelvic organs and to exclude genital abnormalities and mass lesions.

Persistence of endometriosis after correction of an obstructed reproductive tract anomaly

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is commonly found in adolescents with an obstructed reproductive tract and has been reported to always regress after correction. This study highlights 5 patients who had persistent pain and a diagnosis of endometriosis following correction of their anomaly.

CASES

The cases include patients with agenesis of the lower vagina or an obstructed hemivagina. All had recurrence of pain 6 months to 5 years after their corrective surgery. Laparoscopy revealed Stage I, II, and IV endometriosis.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

This case series reveals that endometriosis does not always resolve following repair of an obstructive anomaly. This may result from prior/ongoing peritoneal seeding or other factors. Given possible disease progression and potential adverse effect on fertility, it important to consider laparoscopy and medical therapy if these patients have persistent pain.

Endometriosis for the primary care physician

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will empower the primary care provider (PCP) to evaluate, manage, and refer as needed adolescents with dysmenorrhea and/or chronic pelvic pain (CPP) who are suspected to have endometriosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endometriosis is a common cause of CPP in adolescents who do not respond to primary medical treatment. The presentation in adolescents is unique, causing high rates of misdiagnosis or delayed treatment. Endometriosis-related pain has a marked negative impact on social and mental health. Simple treatments that are available in the primary care setting can alleviate pain and improve quality of life for these young women if initiated in a timely fashion.

SUMMARY

Adolescents usually turn to their PCP for evaluation of dysmenorrhea and CPP. By maintaining a high index of suspicion, initiating treatment, and referring when needed, the PCP can have a tremendous effect on the patient's present and future quality of life.

Endometriosis in adolescents is a hidden, progressive and severe disease that deserves attention, not just compassion

Endometriosis in the adolescent has, in recent years, been discovered to be a challenging problem in gynaecology. Although the pain may start at a young age, even before the onset of menstruation, the diagnosis by laparoscopy is almost always postponed for several years, by which time destructive lesions have affected the tubo-ovarian structures and severely compromised fecundability. Several factors may play a role, but one important reason for this disease progression is likely to be the delay in diagnosis. Therefore, transvaginal ultrasounds and transvaginal access with a less invasive needle endoscopy are recommended for exploration of the pelvis, diagnosis of endometriosis and treatment at an early stage before severe lesions develop.

Endometriomas in adolescents and young women

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical aspects of endometriomas encountered in late adolescent females and young women and to review the issues specifically related to the disease in this age group.

DESIGN

Retrospective medical chart review study.

SETTING

Adolescent gynecology and infertility clinic of a tertiary care hospital with women's health focus.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-three late adolescent females and young women aged ≤ 24 years with endometrioma.

INTERVENTIONS

Operative laparoscopy for endometriomas.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Baseline clinical characteristics of the patients including age, marital status, body mass index, symptoms on admission, family history of endometriosis, past medical history, CA-125 levels, presence of a müllerian anomaly, endometriosis characteristics at the time of surgery, and correlation between ASRM scores and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

The mean age and body mass index of the patients were 22 ± 2 (range 17-24) years and 20.8 ± 2.6 (range 16.6-28.5) kg/m(2) respectively. Chronic pelvic pain was the most common symptom (44%). Two patients had a diagnosis of genital malformation. Forty-one (65%) patients had endometrioma on the right ovary, and 14 (22%) patients had bilateral endometriomas. Only one patient had posterior cul-de-sac completely obliterated. Fifty-five (87%) patients had score <16 points for adnexal adhesions calculated according to the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification.

CONCLUSION

Endometriomas, although rare, can be encountered in adolescents and young women. The disease in adolescent patient group offers particular importance since early intervention is essential in order to decrease pain, prevent progression of the disease and enhance future fertility.

Prevalence of endometriosis diagnosed by laparoscopy in adolescents with dysmenorrhea or chronic pelvic pain: a systematic review

BACKGROUND Endometriosis associated with pain symptoms in adolescents has been extensively reported, but the exact prevalence is unclear because pain symptoms may be atypical and endometriosis can only be diagnosed by laparoscopy. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the prevalence of endometriosis diagnosed by laparoscopy in adolescents. METHODS A systematic literature search was carried out for relevant articles published between 1980 and 2011 in the databases PUBMED and EMBASE, based on the keywords 'endometriosis', 'laparoscopy', 'adolescents' and 'chronic pelvic pain (CPP)'. In addition, the reference lists of the selected articles were examined. RESULTS Based on 15 selected studies, the overall prevalence of visually confirmed endometriosis was 62% (543/880; range 25-100%) in all adolescent girls undergoing laparoscopic investigation, 75% (237/314) in girls with CPP resistant to treatment, 70% (102/146) in girls with dysmenorrhea and 49% (204/420) in girls with CPP that is not necessarily resistant to treatment. Among the adolescent girls with endometriosis, the overall prevalence of American Society of Reproductive Medicine classified moderate-severe endometriosis was 32% (82/259) in all girls, 16% (17/108) in girls with CPP resistant to treatment, 29% (21/74) in girls with dysmenorrhea and 57% (44/77) in girls with CPP that is not necessarily resistant to treatment. Due to the quality of the included papers an overestimation of the prevalence and/or severity of endometriosis is possible. CONCLUSIONS About two-thirds of adolescent girls with CPP or dysmenorrhea have laparoscopic evidence of endometriosis. About one-third of these adolescents with endometriosis have moderate-severe disease. The value of early detection of endometriosis in symptomatic adolescents and the indications for laparoscopic investigation in adolescents require more research.

Laparoscopy in pregnancy and the pediatric patient

Minimally invasive surgery is now standard of care for many procedures in pediatric gynecology. Laparoscopy has been well documented to produce faster recovery,decreased postoperative pain, and because of smaller incisions, a better cosmetic result. These are important when considering an active pediatric patient. Although a laparoscopic approach to endometriosis, adnexal masses, and ovarian torsion are well supported in the literature in the pediatric patient, more data are needed with regard to SILS in younger patients. Laparoscopy seems to be a better approach to oopheropexy in children undergoing radiation, and in resection of certain mullerian anomalies; however, the numbers are low.Similarly in pregnant patients, laparoscopy provides for shorter recovery times,decrease analgesic use and shorter hospital stays. Concerns about poor fetal outcomes in surgery during pregnancy for non gynecologic problems have been brought to light; however, the evidence indicates that these outcomes can be attributed to the nature of the underlying disease and not the surgical approach. With regard to pneumoperitoneum the effect of CO2 insufflation on fetal physiology and long-term outcomes remains unclear, and will continue to be an issue of controversy until larger studies are published.With both the pediatric and pregnant populations, laparoscopic complications can be diminished when performed by skilled surgeons with strict adherence to good technical principles. The advantages of laparoscopy are great, and this approach should be considered in pediatric and pregnant patients.

Use of norethindrone acetate alone for postoperative suppression of endometriosis symptoms

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of norethindrone acetate (NA) as single-agent hormonal therapy for suppression of endometriosis symptoms in adolescents and young adults.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Two academic medical centers.

PARTICIPANTS

A keyword search using the query 'NA' was applied to the electronic medical records of all women treated by one gynecologist (M.R.L.) from 1992 to 2010. IRB-approved chart review was then conducted on the index records.

INTERVENTIONS

Continuous treatment with NA (5-15 mg daily).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative bleeding and pain scores; adverse effects.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-four patients with surgically diagnosed endometriosis initiated NA postoperatively during the study period. Median patient age was 18.9 years. 92.2% of patients had stage 1 or 2 disease, and distribution was similar among those excluded. Median pain scores decreased from 5 at NA initiation to 0 at follow-up (P = .0001) and bleeding scores from 2 to 0, respectively (P = .001) for all stages of endometriosis. Post-NA bleeding scores were improved regardless of prior hormonal regimen, and post-NA pain scores improved in all patients except for those previously prescribed GnRH-agonist plus add-back. Most patients (55.2%) did not report any side effects. The most common adverse effect was weight gain (16.1%), with a mean increase in BMI of 1.2 ± 1.6 kg/m(2) at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

NA alone is a well-tolerated, effective option to manage pain and bleeding for all stages of endometriosis. Among those on prior hormonal therapy, symptoms improved after NA initiation.

Ovarian endometrioma in an 11-year-old girl before menarche: a case study with literature review

BACKGROUND

To date, a limited number of endometriosis cases occurring before or around the time of menarche have been documented.

CASE

An 11-year-old adolescent underwent an emergency operation for left ovarian endometrioma. Her menarche occurred spontaneously 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

We discuss the above mentioned case and consider data published in the literature. Endometrioma should be considered even in premenarcheal girls with ovarian cysts, regardless of their size.

High rate of endometriosis recurrence in young women

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate rate and determinants of long-term recurrence of endometriosis in a population of young women.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University tertiary care referral center for women with benign gynecologic diseases.

PARTICIPANTS

Young women undergoing first-line conservative surgery for endometriosis were eligible for the study. Data on age at surgery, disease stage, anatomical characteristics of endometriotic lesions, and endometriosis-related symptoms were collected. After diagnosis, patients were treated according to the standard care of the center. The protocol required all women to be followed up 1 month after surgery, and every 6 months afterward, with an interview to investigate persistence of symptoms, a clinical examination, and an ultrasound pelvic assessment.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven women aged ≤ 21 (mean age at diagnosis ± SD: 19.0 ± 1.1 years) entered the study. During a 5-year follow-up, 32 (56%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 43%-68%) recurrences of endometriosis were diagnosed. A second laparoscopy to treat the recurrence was performed in 11 (34%) cases and confirmed the presence of the disease in all of them. In the remaining 21 (66%) cases, the recurrence was based on the reappearance of the symptoms or clinical or sonographic findings. The recurrence rate increased constantly with time from first surgery. No association emerged between recurrence rate and endometriosis-related symptoms, site/stage of the disease, type of surgery, and post-surgical medical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The recurrence rate of endometriosis in young women appears higher than in older women. Since no determinants for recurrence have been detected among the factors examined, a profile of women at increased risk cannot be drawn.

Treating endometriosis in adolescents: does it matter?

Endometriosis has major physical and psychosocial impacts on teens, as well as long-term implications for their health. The hidden suffering of millions of adolescents worldwide calls on the medical profession to respond, despite the challenges. Given the increasing understanding of adolescent endometriosis, treating adolescents with endometriosis can be a most rewarding experience. Moreover, diagnosing and treating the disease early could prevent more complicated disease later, as well as comorbidities. Helping these girls may save them, their families, and their communities much physical and emotional pain, as well as lessen the huge burden on our health care systems and society.

Markers of adult endometriosis detectable in adolescence

Endometriosis, a disease of young females that is possibly a devastating ailment requiring surgery, appears to be associated with certain features encountered in adolescence. First among these symptoms is the history of severe and lasting dysmenorrhea at the time of adolescence and the need to use oral contraceptives (OCs) for alleviating dysmenorrhea that failed to respond to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Further awareness about existing associations between certain symptoms experienced at adolescence and the later development of endometriosis is important. Indeed, the possibility of diagnosing endometriosis earlier when suggested by clinical history could lead to less extensive surgery and thus, less damage. Experimental verification of this insight, however, is needed before the concept that early diagnosis means lesser destructive surgery can be ascertained.

Scientific investigation of endometriosis among adolescents

The scientific literature on endometriosis specific to the adolescent population is limited, and the existing data are retrospective and descriptive in nature. It is possible that the disease has a different pathophysiology in adolescents, but little epidemiologic or molecular data exist to support or refute this speculation. In addition, the limited literature does not yet confirm that intervening in the adolescent population prevents long-term sequelae such as pain and infertility as adults. Case-control and cohort studies to identify risk factors, as well as prospective observational and intervention studies to assess treatment outcome, are required to further knowledge about endometriosis in the adolescent population. The scientific literature on endometriosis specific to the adolescent population is limited, and the existing data are retrospective and descriptive in nature. This review summarizes studies that have been done to date and suggests areas for future investigation.

Progression of endometriosis in non-medically managed adolescents: a case series

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is considered a progressive disease that can cause chronic pelvic pain and infertility. A combined medical-surgical approach is the best method to slow the progression of endometriosis. Adolescents who are not maintained on a medical regimen postoperatively may be at risk for disease progression.

CASES

This is a case series of three adolescent patients who presented at 13 to 16 years of age with complaint of severe pelvic pain and were diagnosed with stage 1 endometriosis at the time of laparoscopy. They were then prescribed menstrual suppressive therapy but did not remain compliant with their regimens.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Each patient returned to the operating room and underwent a second laparoscopy which revealed that each patient's disease had progressed to a higher stage. Without combined surgical-medical management, disease worsens, and places patients at risk for severe chronic pelvic pain as well as infertility.

Hormonal contraception and thrombotic risk: a multidisciplinary approach

Heightened publicity about hormonal contraception and thrombosis risk and the publication of new guidelines by the World Health Organization in 2009 and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2010 addressing this complex issue have led to multidisciplinary discussions on the special issues of adolescents cared for at our pediatric hospital. In this review of the literature and new guidelines, we have outlined our approach to the complex patients referred to our center. The relative risk of thrombosis on combined oral contraception is three- to fivefold, whereas the absolute risk for a healthy adolescent on this therapy is only 0.05% per year. This thrombotic risk is affected by estrogen dose, type of progestin, mechanism of delivery, and length of therapy. Oral progestin-only contraceptives and transdermal estradiol used for hormone replacement carry minimal or no thrombotic risk. Transdermal, vaginal, or intrauterine contraceptives and injectable progestins need further study. A personal history of thrombosis, persistent or inherited thrombophilia, and numerous lifestyle choices also influence thrombotic risk. In this summary of one hospital's approach to hormone therapies and thrombosis risk, we review relative-risk data and discuss the application of absolute risk to individual patient counseling. We outline our approach to challenging patients with a history of thrombosis, known thrombophilia, current anticoagulation, or family history of thrombosis or thrombophilia. Our multidisciplinary group has found that knowledge of the guidelines and individualized management plans have been particularly useful for informing discussions about hormonal and nonhormonal options across varied indications.