Perioperative Pregabalin and Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion to Reduce Persistent Neuropathic Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Multicenter, Factorial, Randomized, Controlled Pilot Trial

Safety and Efficacy of Opioid-sparing Anesthesia Compared With Traditional Opioid Anesthesia: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

The rationale of adoption opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) is to achieve perioperative analgesia with a minimal amount of opioids combined with nonopioid adjuvants during and after surgery, namely multimodal anesthesia. The OSA approach was originally developed to overcome the known complications of opioid-based anesthesia (OA), and the present scoping review (ScR) aims at providing clinical evidence of the safety and efficacy of OSA with respect to OA.

METHODS

This ScR is mainly focused on studies presenting evidence on the safety and efficacy of OSA versus OA. PubMed and EMBASE databases were utilized to find relevant studies. The search strategy included the following keywords: "opioid sparing anesthesia complications, opioid sparing anesthesia efficacy, opioid sparing anesthesia safety." The findings from the 25 included studies were categorized into the following subsections: article characteristics, goals of the studies, OSA protocols, and surgical settings analyzed.

RESULTS

In the 25 reviewed studies, evidence related to the impact of OSA versus OA was considered. Intraoperative safety and efficacy end points include hemodynamic stability and anesthetic/analgesic requirements. Postoperative end points include early cognitive dysfunction, opioid-induced bowel disorder, the physical status of mothers and newborns after labor and emergency cesarean, systemic immune and inflammation modifications, postoperative recovery, in-hospital and long-term opioid requirement, early postoperative pain, and chronic postsurgical pain. The studies reported lower intraoperative mean arterial pressure and heart rate fluctuations when α 2 agonists were adopted, while no differences were recorded for other complication rates. Analysis of OSA approaches for the postoperative conditions includes α 2 agonists, NMDA receptor blocking agents, gabapentinoids, nefopam hydrochloride, and locoregional anesthesia techniques with a positive impact on most of the end points considered.

DISCUSSION

The clinical implementation of OSA encompasses the perioperative use of nonopioid drugs and locoregional anesthesia techniques. The reviewed studies reported OSA as a feasible approach to reduce opioid-related complications with no impact on patient safety.

Ferroptosis contributes to the progression of female-specific neoplasms, from breast cancer to gynecological malignancies in a manner regulated by non-coding RNAs: Mechanistic implications

Ferroptosis, a recently identified type of non-apoptotic cell death, triggers the elimination of cells in the presence of lipid peroxidation and in an iron-dependent manner. Indeed, ferroptosis-stimulating factors have the ability of suppressing antioxidant capacity, leading to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the subsequent oxidative death of the cells. Ferroptosis is involved in the pathophysiological basis of different maladies, such as multiple cancers, among which female-oriented malignancies have attracted much attention in recent years. In this context, it has also been unveiled that non-coding RNA transcripts, including microRNAs, long non-coding RNAs, and circular RNAs have regulatory interconnections with the ferroptotic flux, which controls the pathogenic development of diseases. Furthermore, the potential of employing these RNA transcripts as therapeutic targets during the onset of female-specific neoplasms to modulate ferroptosis has become a research hotspot; however, the molecular mechanisms and functional alterations of ferroptosis still require further investigation. The current review comprehensively highlights ferroptosis and its association with non-coding RNAs with a focus on how this crosstalk affects the pathogenesis of female-oriented malignancies, from breast cancer to ovarian, cervical, and endometrial neoplasms, suggesting novel therapeutic targets to decelerate and even block the expansion and development of these tumors.

Persistent Pain After Breast Cancer Treatment, an Underreported Burden for Breast Cancer Survivors

BACKGROUND

Many patients who have undergone surgery experience persistent pain after breast cancer treatment (PPBCT). These symptoms often remain unnoticed by treating physician(s), and the pathophysiology of PPBCT remains poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to determine prevalence of PPBCT and examine the association between PPBCT and various patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study enrolling patients with breast cancer treated at Máxima Medical Center between 2005 and 2016. PPBCT was defined as pain in the breast, anterior thorax, axilla, and/or medial upper arm that persists for at least 3 months after surgery. Tumor and treatment characteristics were derived from the Dutch Cancer Registry and electronic patient files.

RESULTS

Between February and March 2019, a questionnaire was sent to 2022 women, of whom 56.5% responded. Prevalence of PPBCT among the responders was 37.9%, with 50.8% reporting moderate to severe pain. Multivariable analyses showed that women with signs of anxiety, depression or a history of smoking had a higher risk of experiencing PPBCT. Women aged 70 years or older at diagnosis were significantly less likely to report PPBCT compared with younger women. No significant association was found between PPBCT and treatment characteristics, including type of axillary surgery and radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable percentage of patients with breast cancer experience PPBCT. Women with signs of anxiety or depression and women with a history of smoking are more likely to report PPBCT. Further research is required to understand the underlying etiology and to improve prevention and treatment strategies for PPBCT.

Prevention of persistent pain with lidocaine infusions in breast cancer surgery (PLAN): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Persistent pain is a common yet debilitating complication after breast cancer surgery. Given the pervasive effects of this pain disorder on the patient and healthcare system, post-mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is becoming a larger population health problem, especially as the prognosis and survivorship of breast cancer increases. Interventions that prevent persistent pain after breast surgery are needed to improve the quality of life of breast cancer survivors. An intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion has emerged as a potential intervention to decrease the incidence of PMPS. We aim to determine the definitive effects of this intervention in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.

METHODS

PLAN will be a multicenter, parallel-group, blinded, 1:1 randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 1,602 patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Adult patients scheduled for a lumpectomy or mastectomy will be randomized to receive an intravenous 2% lidocaine bolus of 1.5 mg/kg with induction of anesthesia, followed by a 2.0 mg/kg/h infusion until the end of surgery, or placebo solution (normal saline) at the same volume. The primary outcome will be the incidence of persistent pain at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of pain and opioid consumption at 1 h, 1-3 days, and 12 months after surgery, as well as emotional, physical, and functional parameters, and cost-effectiveness.

DISCUSSION

This trial aims to provide definitive evidence on an intervention that could potentially prevent persistent pain after breast cancer surgery. If this trial is successful, lidocaine infusion would be integrated as standard of care in breast cancer management. This inexpensive, widely available, and easily administered intervention has the potential to reduce pain and suffering in an already afflicted patient population, decrease the substantial costs of chronic pain management, potentially decrease opioid use, and improve the quality of life in patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04874038, Dr. James Khan. Date of registration: May 5, 2021).

Anesthesia and cancer recurrence: a narrative review

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. With the increasingly aging population, the number of emerging cancer cases is expected to increase markedly in the foreseeable future. Surgical resection with adjuvant therapy is the best available option for the potential cure of many solid tumors; thus, approximately 80% of patients with cancer undergo at least one surgical procedure during their disease. Agents used in general anesthesia can modulate cytokine release, transcription factors, and/or oncogenes. This can affect host immunity and the capability of cancer cells to survive and migrate, not only during surgery but for up to several weeks after surgery. However, it remains unknown whether exposure to anesthetic agents affects cancer recurrence or metastasis. This review explores the current literature to explain whether and how the choice of anesthetic and perioperative medication affect cancer surgery outcomes.

Information about missing patient-reported outcome data in breast cancer trials is frequently not documented: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

This review addresses the common problem of missing patient-reported outcome (PRO) data in clinical trials by assessing the current practice of their statistical handling as reported in publications of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with breast cancer.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We searched PubMed to identify RCTs evaluating biomedical treatments in breast cancer patients with at least one PRO endpoint published between January 2019 and February 2022. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility of the publications for this scoping review and extracted prespecified information on missing PRO data and related statistical practices.

RESULTS

Of 1,598 publications identified, 118 trials met the inclusion criteria. Eighty-eight (74.6%) trials reported the extent of missing data, with 11 (9.3%) not containing any missing PRO data. Twenty-one (19.6%) trials explicitly stated the statistical approach for handling missing data, with a preference for single imputation over multiple imputation approaches (57.2%/19.0%). Only six (5.6%) trials reported a sensitivity analysis to examine the extent to the results being affected by changes in assumptions made about missing PRO data.

CONCLUSION

International efforts to raise awareness of the importance of accurately reporting state-of-the-art handling of missing PRO data are not yet fully reflected in the current literature of breast cancer RCTs.

Perineural invasion: A potential driver of cancer-induced pain

Perineural invasion (PNI) is the process through which tumors invade and interact with nerves. The dynamic changes in the nerves caused by PNI may induce disturbing symptoms. PNI-related cancer pain in neuro-rich tumors has attracted much attention because the occurrence of tumor-induced pain is closely related to the invasion of nerves in the tumor microenvironment. PNI-related pain might indicate the occurrence of PNI, guide the improvement of treatment strategies, and predict the unresectability of tumors and the necessity of palliative care. Although many studies have investigated PNI, its relationship with tumor-induced pain and its common mechanisms have not been summarized thoroughly. Therefore, in this review, we evaluated the relationship between PNI and cancer-associated pain. We showed that PNI is a major cause of cancer-related pain and that this pain can predict the occurrence of PNI. We also elucidated the cellular and molecular mechanisms of PNI-induced pain. Finally, we analyzed the possible targets for alleviating PNI-related pain or combined antitumor and pain management. Our findings might provide new perspectives for improving the treatment of patients with malignant tumors.

Perioperative intravenous lidocaine for postoperative pain in patients undergoing breast surgery: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine infusion in managing acute and chronic pain following breast surgery has been a topic of debate. This meta-analysis aims to assess the impact of perioperative intravenous lidocaine on the relief of postoperative pain among patients undergoing breast surgery.

Methods

A systematic search of databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of intravenous lidocaine infusion with placebo or routine care in patients undergoing breast surgery. The primary outcome of interest was the occurrence of chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) at the longest follow-up. Meta-analyses, incorporating trial sequential analysis, were performed using a random-effects model to assess the overall effect.

Results

A total of twelve trials, involving 879 patients, were included in the analysis. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of CPSP at the longest follow-up (risk ratio [RR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.81; P = 0.0005; I2 = 6%). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) indicated that the cumulative z curve crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundary for benefit, providing sufficient and conclusive evidence. Furthermore, intravenous lidocaine was associated with decreased opioid consumption and a shorter length of hospital stay.

Conclusion

Perioperative intravenous lidocaine is effective in relieving acute and CPSP in patients undergoing breast surgery.

Systematic review registration

https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY2022100033.

Perioperative Administration of Pregabalin and Esketamine to Prevent Chronic Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Perioperative multimodal analgesia can prevent chronic pain after breast cancer surgery. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of combined perioperative oral pregabalin and postoperative esketamine in preventing chronic pain after breast cancer surgery.

Methods

Ninety patients undergoing elective breast cancer surgery were randomized into the combined pregabalin and esketamine group (EP group) and the general anesthesia alone group (Control group). The EP group received 150 mg of oral pregabalin 1 h before surgery and twice daily for seven days postoperatively, and a patient-controlled analgesia pump after surgery that delivered 100 μg sufentanil + 1.25 mg/kg esketamine + 4 mg tropisetron in 100 mL saline solution intravenously. The Control group received placebo capsules before and after the surgery and routine postoperative analgesia (100 μg sufentanil + 4 mg tropisetron in 100 mL saline solution). The primary outcome was the incidence of chronic pain three and six months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included acute postoperative pain, postoperative opioid consumption, and incidence of adverse events.

Results

The incidence of chronic pain in the EP group was significantly lower than in the Control group three (14.3% vs 46.3%, P = 0.005) and six (7.1% vs 31.7%, P = 0.009) months postoperatively. The rest numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores 1-3 days postoperatively and coughing NRS pain scores 1-7 days postoperatively in the EP group were significantly lower than in the Control group (all P ˂ 0.05). The cumulative sufentanil consumption in the EP group during postoperative 0-12, 12-24, and 24-48, 0-24, and 0-48 hours were significantly lower than in the Control group (all P ˂ 0.05).

Conclusion

Combined perioperative oral pregabalin and postoperative esketamine effectively prevented chronic pain after breast cancer surgery, improved acute postoperative pain, and reduced postoperative opioid consumption.

Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on pain and shoulder range of motion in post-mastectomy pain syndrome patients: a randomized-control trial

Background

Post-mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is a highly prevalent complication after surgical treatment for breast cancer, and it affects the patient’s quality of life in aspects of losing shoulder full range of motion, pain, and depression. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is non-invasive brain stimulation technique that was used in numerous clinical applications and in pain reduction in cancer patients. However, the effectiveness of tDCS on PMPS has never been evaluated in an experimental study.

Aim

To investigate the effect of bilateral anodal tDCS of motor cortex (M1) on pain, depression, and shoulder range of motion (ROM) in post-mastectomy pain syndrome.

Study design

Randomized controlled trial.

Methods

A total of 30 female patients with post-mastectomy neuropathic pain were randomized into two groups; the intervention group which received bilateral tDCS on motor cortex (M1) and the control group that received sham bilateral tDCS on M1. As pain affects shoulder range of motion (ROM), shoulder ROM was measured by electronic goniometer pre- and post-tDCS application. In addition, the levels of pain and depression have been measured pre and post treatment. Pain has been measured with visual analogue scale (VAS) and depression with Beck-Depression-Inventory-BDI questionnaire (BDI).

Results

A significant difference was noted in group A regarding pain, depression and shoulder ROM (p= 0.001, p= 0.003, and p= 0.003, respectively). Between group comparison revealed a significant difference of VAS scores and shoulder flexion ROM between groups, the study group and the control group (p=0.041 and 0.048, respectively). Pain decreased by 32% and Shoulder flexion increased by 4.8% post-treatment while there were no significant difference in group B (p=0.567 and p=0.866, respectively).

Conclusions

The application of tDCS decreases the severity of pain and improves shoulder range of motion suffered by breast cancer patients after total mastectomy surgery.

Long-term effect of anesthesia choice on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing open liver resection

Clinical and experimental evidence suggested that anesthesia choice can influence cancer progression and patients' outcomes by modulating tumor microenvironment and tumorigenic pathways. Curative resection is the mainstay of therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is an intractable disease due to high recurrence and poor prognosis. However, different anesthetics may play different roles in alleviating surgery-induced stress response and inflammatory cytokines release that are considered to be closely associated with proliferation, invasion and metastasis of tumor cells. Propofol, sevoflurane, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and local anesthetics have shown to exert anti-tumor effect on HCC mainly through regulating microRNAs or signaling pathways, while other inhalational agents, dexmedetomidine and opioids have the potential to promote tumor growth. In terms of anesthetic methods and analgesia strategies, propofol based total intravenous anesthesia and thoracic epidural analgesia could be preferred for HCC patients undergoing open liver resection rather than inhalational anesthesia. Local anesthesia techniques have great potential to attenuate perioperative stress response, hence they may contribute to more favorable outcomes. This review summarized the relations between different anesthesia choices and HCC patients' long-term outcomes as well as their underlying mechanisms. Due to the complexity of molecules interactions and signaling pathways, further studies are warranted to confirm these results so as to optimize anesthesia strategy for HCC patients.

Incidence, risk factors, prevention and treatment of postmastectomy pain syndrome in breast cancer: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is a common postoperative condition after breast cancer surgery.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence rate and risk factors of PMPS, and to propose prevention and treatment methods.

METHODS

The study included 1790 postoperative breast cancer patients from three hospitals from 2017 to 2021, of which 302 (13.0%) patients with PMPS were included in the study.

RESULTS

Age, breast surgery type, axillary surgery type and radiotherapy are the risk factors of PMPS. Age, radiotherapy and chemotherapy affect the pain degree of PMPS during movement.

CONCLUSIONS

For breast cancer patients with high risk factors, pain should be actively prevented during perioperative period. Oral pharmacological agents, multidisciplinary combination therapy, local anesthetics and regional anesthesia are the most common treatment of PMPS.

Influence of Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block on Chronic Pain at 3 Months After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Prospective, Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

In 2015, we evaluated our practices regarding pain after breast-conserving surgery. Thereafter, we have adapted our practices by performing a systematic deep serratus plane block before the surgical incision. In 2019, we assessed the impact of these changes in terms of chronic pain. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of chronic pain 3 months after this type of surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients treated with breast-conserving surgery as outpatients were included in this prospective study between April and July 2019. After inducing general anesthesia, 20 mL of ropivacaine 3.75 mg/mL were injected under the serratus muscle. Morphine titration was performed in the recovery room according to pain scores. A pain and quality of life questionnaire was sent 3 months after surgery. A backward logistic regression model was applied to calculate the adjusted odds ratios.

RESULTS

The final analysis involved 137 patients. Three months after surgery, 43 patients (31%) reported persistent pain related to the surgery. Maximum pain in the last 24 hours was moderate to severe in 60% of cases, 16 patients (35%) took painkillers. Morphine titration in the recovery room was required in 25 patients (18%). Younger age and the use of lidocaine to prevent after injection of propofol during general anesthesia induction appeared to be protective factors for the risk of pain at 3 months (secondary endpoints).

DISCUSSION

No persistent pain at 3 months was reported in 69% of cases. Furthermore, the use of a deep serratus anterior plane block before the surgical incision has limited the need for morphine titration in the recovery room to <1 patient in 5. These evaluations of professional practices should be encouraged.

Individualized multidisciplinary analgesia to prevent persistent postsurgical pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Persistent postsurgical pain as outcome of surgery has reached more attention in the past years. In the first place because of related disability, long-term use of (opioid)analgesics and impact on the quality of life of individual patients. In addition, the individual and societal socio-economic burden of PPSP is high and increasing in the light of increasing numbers of surgery world-wide.

RECENT FINDINGS

Actual studies identified risk factors for persistent postsurgical pain in relevant patient populations. Astonishingly, most of predicting factors seem unrelated to surgery.

SUMMARY

Future perioperative practice will have to focus on identifying patients at risk for PPSP before surgery and develop/offer suitable individually tailored preventive interventions.

Management of Postoperative Pain in Patients Following Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review

Perioperative pain management is a unique challenge in patients undergoing spine surgery due to the increased incidence of both pre-existing chronic pain conditions and chronic postsurgical pain. Peri-operative planning and counseling in spine surgery should involve an interdisciplinary approach that includes consideration of patient-level risk factors, as well as pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic pain management techniques. Consideration of psychological factors and patient focused education as an adjunct to these measures is paramount in developing a personalized perioperative pain management plan. Understanding the currently available body of knowledge surrounding perioperative opioid management, management of opioid use disorder, regional/neuraxial anesthetic techniques, ketamine/lidocaine infusions, non-opioid oral analgesics, and behavioral interventions can be useful in developing a comprehensive, multi-modal treatment plan among patients undergoing spine surgery. Although many of these techniques have proved efficacious in the immediate postoperative period, long-term follow-up is needed to define the impact of such approaches on persistent pain and opioid use. Future techniques involving the use of precision medicine may help identify phenotypic and physiologic characteristics that can identify patients that are most at risk of developing persistent postoperative pain after spine surgery.

Quality of meta-analyses of non-opioid, pharmacological, perioperative interventions for chronic postsurgical pain: a systematic review

Background

In an attempt to aggregate observations from clinical trials, several meta-analyses have been published examining the effectiveness of systemic, non-opioid, pharmacological interventions to reduce the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain.

Objective

To inform the design and reporting of future studies, the purpose of our study was to examine the quality of these meta-analyses.

Evidence review

We conducted an electronic literature search in Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Published meta-analyses, from the years 2010 to 2020, examining the effect of perioperative, systemic, non-opioid pharmacological treatments on the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain in adult patients were identified. Data extraction focused on methodological details. Meta-analysis quality was assessed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) critical appraisal tool.

Findings

Our search yielded 17 published studies conducting 58 meta-analyses for gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin), ketamine, lidocaine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and mexiletine. According to AMSTAR 2, 88.2% of studies (or 15/17) were low or critically low in quality. The most common critical element missing was an analysis of publication bias. Trends indicated an improvement in quality over time and association with journal impact factor.

Conclusions

With few individual trials adequately powered to detect treatment effects, meta-analyses play a crucial role in informing the perioperative management of chronic postsurgical pain. In light of this inherent value and despite a number of attempts, high-quality meta-analyses are still needed.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42021230941.

Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Reduce Post-operative Pain and Length of Hospital in Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective. It is debated wheter intravenous (IV) lidocaine improves post-operative pain and has other potential benefits in elderly patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the effect of perioperative continuous IV lidocaine in elderly patients undergoing surgery. Method. PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and CENTRAL databases (through OVID SP) were searched independently until October 10, 2020 by two authors. We included all randomized controlled trials that compared the effect of continuous IV lidocaine and any placebo or no treatment in elderly patients after surgery. Primary outcomes were length of hospital stay and post-operative pain score. Results. Eighteen studies (988 patients) were included. Meta-analysis suggested that IV lidocaine reduced the post-operative pain scores 2 hours (standardized mean difference [SMD]: −1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.03 to −1.13), 4 hours (SMD:−1.20, 95% CI: −2.02 to −.39), 8 hours (SMD:−.82, 95% CI: −1.51 to −.13), 12 hours (SMD:−.66, 95% CI: −1.28 to −.04), and 24 hours (SMD:−.42, 95% CI: −.72 to −.12) post-operatively. Moreover, those patients given IV lidocaine had a shorter length of hospital stay (MD: −.24, 95% CI: −.71 to −.23) and required fewer opioid drugs (SMD: −.31, 95% CI: −.31 to −.01). Conclusion. The evidence suggested that IV lidocaine significantly reduced post-operative pain intensity and opioid consumption and shortened the length of hospital stay in elderly patients. IV lidocaine decreased the incidence of post-operative nausea while it could not reduce the incidence of post-operative vomiting and accelerate the recovery of gastrointestinal function.

Perioperative Breast Analgesia: a Systematic Review of the Evidence for Perioperative Analgesic Medications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breast surgery is common and may result in significant acute as well as chronic pain. A wide range of pharmacologic interventions is available including opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, anticonvulsants, and other non-opioids with analgesic properties. We present a review of the evidence for these pharmacologic interventions. A literature search of the MEDLINE database was performed via PubMed with combined terms related to breast surgery, anesthesia, and analgesia. Articles were limited to randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, adult patients undergoing elective surgery on the breast (not including biopsy), and pharmacologic interventions only. Article titles and abstracts were screened, and risk of bias assessments were performed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The search strategy initially captured 7254 articles of which 60 articles met the full inclusion criteria. Articles were organized according to intervention: 6 opioid agonists, 14 NSAIDs and acetaminophen, 4 alpha-2 agonists, 7 NMDA receptor antagonists, 6 local anesthetics, 7 steroids, 15 anticonvulsants (one of which also discussed an NMDA antagonist), 1 antiarrhythmic, and 2 serotonin reuptake inhibitors (one of which also studied an anticonvulsant). A wide variety of medications is effective for perioperative breast analgesia, but results vary by agent and dose. The most efficacious are likely NSAIDs and anticonvulsants. Some agents may also decrease the incidence of chronic postoperative pain, including flurbiprofen, gabapentin, venlafaxine, and memantine. While many individual agents are well studied, optimal combinations of analgesic medications remain unclear.

Anesthesia and Cancer, Friend or Foe? A Narrative Review

Cancer remains the leading cause of death worldwide with close to 10 million deaths reported annually. Due to growth of the advanced age cohort in our population, it is predicted that the number of new cancer cases diagnosed between now until 2035 is to reach potentially 24 million individuals, a staggering increase in a relatively short time period. For many solid tumors, surgical resection along with chemotherapy is the best available approach to a potential cure which leads to almost 80% of cancer patients undergoing at least one surgical procedure during the course of their disease. During surgical intervention, the exposure to general anesthesia can be lengthy, complex and often involves various modalities resulting in an important question as to the role, if any, anesthesia may play in primary recurrence or metastatic conversion. Many components of the stress and inflammatory responses exhibited in the perioperative period can contribute to cancer growth and invasion. The agents used to induce and maintain general anesthesia have variable interactions with the immune and neuroendocrine systems and can influence the stress response during surgery. Thus, debating the best type of anesthesia that would help to attenuate sympathetic and/or pro-inflammatory responses while modulating cytokine release and transcription factors/oncogenes remains at the forefront. This may affect inducible cancer cell survival and migratory abilities not only intra-operatively, but also during the immediate post-operative phase of recovery. The ultimate question becomes how and whether the choice of anesthesia may influence the outcomes of cancer surgery with two major approaches being considered, i.e., regional and general anesthesia as well as the various hypnotics, analgesics and sympatholytics commonly used. In this review, we will address the latest information as to the role that anesthesia may play during cancer surgery with specific focus on primary recurrence and metastasis.

"Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Prevention Modalities"

Background

Post-mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is a surgical complication of breast surgery characterized by chronic neuropathic pain. The development of PMPS is multifactorial and research on its prevention is limited. The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize the existing evidence on interventions for lowering the incidence of persistent neuropathic pain after breast surgery.

Methods

Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we performed a comprehensive search of the electronic databases of MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov using a combination of database-specific controlled vocabulary and keyword searches. Two reviewers independently screened all unique records. Publications on chronic (>3-month duration) pain after breast cancer-related surgery were included. Studies were classified by modality.

Results

Our literature search yielded 7092 articles after deduplication. We identified 45 studies that met final inclusion criteria for analysis, including 37 randomized-controlled trials. These studies revealed seven major intervention modalities for prevention of PMPS: physical therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, oral medications, surgical intervention, anesthesia, nerve blocks, and topical medication therapy.

Conclusion

High-quality data on preventative techniques for PMPS are required to inform decisions for breast cancer survivors. We present a comprehensive assessment of the modalities available that can help guide breast and reconstructive surgeons employ effective strategies to lower the incidence and severity of PMPS. Our review supports the use of multimodal care involving both a peripherally targeted treatment and centrally acting medication to prevent the development of PMPS.

Postoperative analgesic effect of parecoxib sodium local anesthesia in patients with breast cancer through systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Postoperative pain can seriously affect a patient's recovery, and parecoxib sodium has a good analgesic effect. However, there is a lack of clinically systematic analyses of the effects of parecoxib sodium on postoperative pain in breast cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of parecoxib sodium local anesthesia in the treatment of postoperative pain in breast cancer patients.

Methods

Literature published from January 2010 to December 2020 was searched in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Wanfang database, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. Literature on randomized controlled trials of parecoxib sodium local anesthesia in patients with breast cancer was collected. Method of treatment was extracted and literature quality was assessed. Meta-analyses of included literature were performed using RevMan 5.3.

Results

A total of 17 randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 1,032 breast cancer surgery patients. The experimental group was treated with parecoxib sodium anesthesia, and the control group was treated with other anesthesia methods. The meta-analysis results showed that there were obvious differences among visual analogue scale (VAS) score of the experimental group and control group 2 h after surgery [mean difference (MD): -0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.29 to -0.29; P=0.002], 4 h (MD =-0.77; 95% CI: =-1.51 to -0.03; P=0.04), 6 h (MD: -1.10; 95% CI: -1.41 to -0.80; P<0.00001), 8 h (MD: -0.66; 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.33; P=0.0001), 12 h (MD: -0.92; 95% CI: -1.24 to -0.60; P<0.00001), 24 h (MD: -0.86; 95% CI: -1.15 to -0.58; P<0.00001), and 48 h (MD: -0.90; 95% CI: -1.47 to -0.33; P=0.002). Moreover, visual analog scale score and the postoperative controlled analgesia frequency of patients in the experimental group (MD: -2.08; 95% CI: -2.88 to -1.27; P<0.00001) and the incidence of adverse reactions (odds ratio: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.34-0.80; P=0.002) were significantly reduced.

Discussion

Parecoxib sodium local anesthesia for breast cancer patients has good postoperative analgesia and treatment safety.

The Effect of Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block on Chronic Postsurgical Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Introduction

The high incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) has been a major issue after breast cancer surgery (BCS). The impact of regional anesthesia (RA) techniques on CPSP remains conflicting. In this propensity score-matched cohort study, we aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative single-shot erector spinae plane block (ESPB) adding to general anesthesia (GA) on the incidence of CPSP at 1 year following BCS.

Methods

Data of adult female patients who underwent unilateral BCS between October 2019 and June 2020 were retrospectively collected. Patients were grouped to ESPB combined with GA (ESPB + GA) and GA alone, respectively. All patients were prospectively followed up at 1 year after surgery. CPSP and neuropathic pain (NP) were measured using the brief pain inventory–short form (BPI-SF) and ID Pain scale. Eleven confounding factors were managed by propensity score matching (PSM) to achieve between-group balance. The primary outcome was the incidence of CPSP at 1 year after BCS. The secondary outcomes include proportion of NP, severity, and interference of CPSP at 1 year after surgery, acute postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), hospital length of stay (LOS), and adverse events.

Results

After PSM, data for 194 patients were available for analysis (97 in each group). No significant difference in the incidence of CPSP (P = 1.000) nor percentage of patients with NP (P = 0.442) was found between the two groups. Both matched groups had similar intensity of CPSP (P = 0.547) measured by BPI-SF as well as the rates of moderate to severe CPSP (P = 1.000). A significant decrease in acute pain scores (P = 0.043) and rates of rescue analgesics demand (P = 0.042) were observed in the ESPB + GA group compared to the GA group. Multivariate logistic regression on the total study cohort showed that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (OR 3.541, 95% CI: 1.273–9.851, P = 0.015), radiotherapy (OR 1.918, 95% CI: 1.067–3.448, P = 0.029) and acute postoperative pain within 24 h (OR 2.109, 95% CI: 1.097–4.056, P = 0.036) were independent risk factors for the development of CPSP.

Conclusions

We found that preoperative single-shot ESPB was not associated with reduced incidence of CPSP at 1 year after BCS. ALND, radiotherapy, and acute postoperative pain within 24 h were independent risk factors for the development of CPSP after BCS.

Trial Registration

The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ID: ChiCTR2000038464, date of registration: September 23, 2020).

Local Anesthetic Lidocaine and Cancer: Insight Into Tumor Progression and Recurrence

Cancer is a leading contributor to deaths worldwide. Surgery is the primary treatment for resectable cancers. Nonetheless, it also results in inflammatory response, angiogenesis, and stimulated metastasis. Local anesthetic lidocaine can directly and indirectly effect different cancers. The direct mechanisms are inhibiting proliferation and inducing apoptosis via regulating PI3K/AKT/mTOR and caspase-dependent Bax/Bcl2 signaling pathways or repressing cytoskeleton formation. Repression invasion, migration, and angiogenesis through influencing the activation of TNFα-dependent, Src-induced AKT/NO/ICAM and VEGF/PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. Moreover, the indirect influences are immune regulation, anti-inflammation, and postoperative pain relief. This review summarizes the latest evidence that revealed potential clinical benefits of lidocaine in cancer treatment to explore the probable molecular mechanisms and the appropriate dose.

Pharmacotherapy for the Prevention of Chronic Pain after Surgery in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic postsurgical pain can severely impair patient health and quality of life. This systematic review update evaluated the effectiveness of systemic drugs to prevent chronic postsurgical pain.

METHODS

The authors included double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials including adults that evaluated perioperative systemic drugs. Studies that evaluated same drug(s) administered similarly were pooled. The primary outcome was the proportion reporting any pain at 3 or more months postsurgery.

RESULTS

The authors identified 70 new studies and 40 from 2013. Most evaluated ketamine, pregabalin, gabapentin, IV lidocaine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and corticosteroids. Some meta-analyses showed statistically significant-but of unclear clinical relevance-reductions in chronic postsurgical pain prevalence after treatment with pregabalin, IV lidocaine, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Meta-analyses with more than three studies and more than 500 participants showed no effect of ketamine on prevalence of any pain at 6 months when administered for 24 h or less (risk ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.36 to 1.07]; prevalence, 0 to 88% ketamine; 0 to 94% placebo) or more than 24 h (risk ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.74 to 1.12]; 6 to 71% ketamine; 5 to 78% placebo), no effect of pregabalin on prevalence of any pain at 3 months (risk ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.70 to 1.10]; 4 to 88% pregabalin; 3 to 80% placebo) or 6 months (risk ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.47 to 1.28]; 6 to 68% pregabalin; 4 to 69% placebo) when administered more than 24 h, and an effect of pregabalin on prevalence of moderate/severe pain at 3 months when administered more than 24 h (risk ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.68]; 0 to 20% pregabalin; 4 to 34% placebo). However, the results should be interpreted with caution given small study sizes, variable surgical types, dosages, timing and method of outcome measurements in relation to the acute pain trajectory in question, and preoperative pain status.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite agreement that chronic postsurgical pain is an important topic, extremely little progress has been made since 2013, likely due to study designs being insufficient to address the complexities of this multifactorial problem.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Lidocaine Promoted Ferroptosis by Targeting miR-382-5p /SLC7A11 Axis in Ovarian and Breast Cancer

Ovarian and breast cancer are prevalent female malignancies with increasing occurrence incidence and metastasis, significantly affecting the health and life quality of women globally. Anesthetic lidocaine has presented anti-tumor activities in the experimental conditions. However, the effect of lidocaine on ovarian and breast cancer remains elusive. We identified the important function of lidocaine in enhancing ferroptosis and repressing progression of ovarian and breast cancer. Our data showed that lidocaine further repressed erastin-inhibited ovarian and breast cancer cell viabilities. The treatment of lidocaine induced accumulation of Fe²⁺, iron and lipid reactive oxygen species (ROS) in ovarian and breast cancer cells. The ovarian and breast cancer cell proliferation was suppressed while cell apoptosis was induced by lidocaine in vitro. Lidocaine attenuated invasion and migration of ovarian and breast cancer cells as well. Regarding the mechanism, we found that lidocaine downregulated solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11) expression by enhancing microRNA-382-5p (miR-382-5p) in the cells. The inhibition of miR-382-5p blocked lidocaine-induced ferroptosis of ovarian and breast cancer cells. MiR-382-5p/SLC7A11 axis was involved in lidocaine-mediated inhibition of ovarian and breast cancer cell proliferation in vitro. The miR-382-5p expression was down-regulated but SLC7A11 expression was up-regulated in clinical ovarian and breast cancer samples. Furthermore, the treatment of lidocaine repressed tumor growth of ovarian cancer cells in vivo, in which the miR-382-5p expression was increased while SLC7A11 expression was decreased. Consequently, we concluded that the lidocaine promoted ferroptosis by miR-382-5p/SLC7A11 axis in ovarian and breast cancer cells. The clinical value of lidocaine in the treatment of ovarian and breast cancer deserves to be proved in detail.

Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine Can Accelerate Postoperative Early Recovery in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is defined by intermittent and recurrent episodes of partial or complete obstruction of the upper airway during sleep. Intermittent and recurrent hypoxia/reoxygenation is the main pathophysiological mechanism of OSA. Its consequences include systemic inflammation, activation of the sympathetic nervous system, and release of oxygen free radicals. Infusion of intravenous (IV) lidocaine has anti-inflammatory, antihyperalgesic, and analgesic properties, supporting its use as an anesthetic adjuvant. Lidocaine can reduce nociception and/or cardiovascular responses to surgical stress, as well as postoperative pain and/or analgesic requirements. Because of the high prevalence of OSA in obese patients, the use of opioids to manage postoperative pain in that population is often accompanied by the development of adverse respiratory events, such as hypoventilation and hypoxemia. IV infusion of lidocaine has been shown to enhance the quality of early recovery after laparoscopic bariatric and upper airway surgery. However, limited evidence exists regarding its use in patients undergoing surgery for OSA. In addition, whether IV infusion of lidocaine can improve postoperative early recovery in patients undergoing surgery for OSA remains unknown. Therefore, we hypothesized that IV infusion of lidocaine can improve postoperative early recovery in patients undergoing surgery for OSA. Perioperative infusion also may be a promising analgesic adjunct to enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.

Perioperative Pregabalin for Preventive Analgesia in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES

Pregabalin is a drug for neuropathic pain. Antipronociceptive properties of pregabalin have led to its recent use as an adjuvant to the multimodal postoperative pain regimen. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative pregabalin on acute and chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after breast cancer surgery.

METHODS

A meta-analysis including 8 randomized controlled trials searched from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted. Subgroup analysis was performed according to doses and timecourse of pregabalin administration. Review Manager 5.3 was selected to conduct the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Preoperative pregabalin in breast cancer surgery alleviated acute postoperative pain at rest 24 hours after surgery by 0.31 points on an 0 to 10 Numerical Rating Scale (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.57 to -0.05). Morphine consumption showed a decrease in postoperative use by 1.09 mg (95% CI: -1.61 to -0.57). The incidence of CPSP 3 months after surgery was reduced to 46% (95% CI: 0.25-0.85). Postoperative nausea and vomiting, dizziness, and sedation showed no overall significant reductions. However, a decrease in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and an increase in the incidence of dizziness were noted when patients received 300 mg of pregabalin before surgery.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated that pregabalin showed more efficacy on chronic pain than acute pain after a breast cancer surgery. Further study based on doses and treatment course of pregabalin should be conducted to establish stronger evidence of treatment effects.

[Perioperative measures for prevention of phantom pain: an evidence-based approach to risk reduction]

Prevention of phantom limb pain is one of the biggest and still largely unsolved challenges in perioperative medicine. Despite many study efforts and optimization of postoperative pain treatment over the last 30 years, a significant reduction in the incidence of phantom limb pain has not been achieved. Current studies have also shown that at least 50% of patients develop phantom pain after 6 months. A possible approach could be to combine multiple synergistic interventions and implement them as a perioperative phantom pain management strategy bundle. In addition to regional anesthesia, NMDA antagonists, gabapentinoids, antidepressants and systemic lidocaine could play a relevant role. The aim of this pharmacological intervention was the modification of the pathophysiological changes in peripheral nerves and in the central nervous system after amputation.

Intravenous infusion of lidocaine enhances the efficacy of conventional treatment of postherpetic neuralgia

BACKGROUND

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is one kind of severe neuropathic pain which currently cannot be effectively cured. Recent researches suggest that intravenous infusion of lidocaine has a therapeutic effect on neuropathic pain such as PHN; however, the optimal dose and frequency of lidocaine infusion and the effectiveness and safety of this treatment in PHN patients still needs more clinical research. The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of daily intravenous lidocaine infusion on the outcome of the routine treatment of PHN.

METHODS

Sixty PHN patients were randomly divided into two groups: 1) control group (Control), treated with conventional therapies, such as antiepileptic pills, analgesics, neurotrophic medicines, paravertebral spinal nerve block and physiotherapy; 2) lidocaine group (Lido) received daily infusion of lidocaine (4 mg/kg) besides the conventional treatments. If the pain is not controlled sufficiently, additional tramadol is given and the average consumption of tramadol is calculated. Pain intensity was assessed before and after each infusion, and the number of breakthrough pain in the last 24 hrs were recorded. The incidence of adverse reactions related to intravenous lidocaine infusion was recorded.

RESULTS

For five consecutive days, numeric rating scale (NRS) scores were significantly decreased after 1 hr of intravenous infusion of lidocaine. Compared with Control, the NRS scores and the frequency of breakthrough pain in the Lido were significantly reduced. In addition, the extra tramadol consumption in the Lido was significantly lower than that in the Control, and the average hospital stay of patients in Lido was decreased. However, anxiety and depression scores showed no difference between Lido and Control.

CONCLUSION

Daily intravenous lidocaine (4 mg/kg for 5 days) enhanced the outcome of PHN treatment, reduced the amount of analgesic medicine and shortened the length of hospital stay with no obvious adverse side effects.