1
|
Pan H, Bakalov V, Cox L, Engle ML, Erickson SW, Feolo M, Guo Y, Huggins W, Hwang S, Kimura M, Krzyzanowski M, Levy J, Phillips M, Qin Y, Williams D, Ramos EM, Hamilton CM. Identifying Datasets for Cross-Study Analysis in dbGaP using PhenX. Sci Data 2022; 9:532. [PMID: 36050327 PMCID: PMC9434066 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01660-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Identifying relevant studies and harmonizing datasets are major hurdles for data reuse. Common Data Elements (CDEs) can help identify comparable study datasets and reduce the burden of retrospective data harmonization, but they have not been required, historically. The collaborative team at PhenX and dbGaP developed an approach to use PhenX variables as a set of CDEs to link phenotypic data and identify comparable studies in dbGaP. Variables were identified as either comparable or related, based on the data collection mode used to harmonize data across mapped datasets. We further added a CDE data field in the dbGaP data submission packet to indicate use of PhenX and annotate linkages in the future. Some 13,653 dbGaP variables from 521 studies were linked through PhenX variable mapping. These variable linkages have been made accessible for browsing and searching in the repository through dbGaP CDE-faceted search filter and the PhenX variable search tool. New features in dbGaP and PhenX enable investigators to identify variable linkages among dbGaP studies and reveal opportunities for cross-study analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huaqin Pan
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
| | | | - Lisa Cox
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Michael Feolo
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Yuelong Guo
- GeneCentric Therapeutics Inc., Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Masato Kimura
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Josh Levy
- Levy Informatics, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Ying Qin
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | - Erin M Ramos
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Durieux BN, Berrier A, Catzen HZ, Gray TF, Lakin JR, Cunningham R, Morris SE, Tulsky JA, Sanders JJ. " I think that she would have wanted. . .": Qualitative interviews with bereaved caregivers reveal complexity in measuring goal-concordant care at the end of life. Palliat Med 2022; 36:742-750. [PMID: 35164612 DOI: 10.1177/02692163221078472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Experts consider goal-concordant care an important healthcare outcome for individuals with serious illness. Despite their relationship to the patient and knowledge about the patient's wishes and values, little is known about bereaved family caregivers' perceptions of how end-of-life care aligns with patient goals and preferences. AIM To understand caregivers' perceptions about patients' care experiences, the extent to which care was perceived as goal-concordant, and the factors that contextualized the end-of-life care experience. DESIGN Qualitative interview study employing a semi-structured interview guide based on the National Health and Aging Trends Survey end-of-life planning module. Template analysis was used to identify themes. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Nineteen recently bereaved family caregivers of people with serious illness in two academic medical centers in the Northeastern United States. RESULTS Most caregivers reported goal-concordant care, though many also recalled experiences of goal discordance. Three themes characterized care perceptions and related to perceived quality: communication, relationships and humanistic care, and care transitions. Within communication, caregivers described the importance of clear communication, inadequate prognostic communication, and information gaps that undermined caregiver confidence in decision making. Patient-clinician relationships enriched care and were considered higher-quality when felt to be humanistic. Finally, care transitions impacted goal discordance when marked by logistical barriers, a need to establish relationships with new providers, inadequate information transfer, and poor care coordination. CONCLUSIONS Bereaved caregivers commonly rated care as goal-concordant while also identifying areas of disappointing and low-quality care. Communication, relationships and humanistic care, and care transitions are modifiable quality improvement targets for patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Berrier
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Gillings School of Global Public Health at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Tamryn F Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua R Lakin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rebecca Cunningham
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sue E Morris
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James A Tulsky
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Justin J Sanders
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gloeckler S, Krones T, Biller-Andorno N. Advance care planning evaluation: a scoping review of best research practice. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021:bmjspcare-2021-003193. [PMID: 34667065 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Various indicators have been used to evaluate advance care planning, including completion rates, type of care received, and satisfaction. Recent consensus suggests, though, that receiving care consistent with one's goals is the primary outcome of advance care planning and assessment should capture this metric. Goal concordant care is challenging to measure, and there is little clarity about how best to do so. The aim of this scoping review is to explore what methods have been used to measure goal concordant care in the evaluation of advance care planning. PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane were searched in September 2020 to identify studies that aimed to track whether advance care planning affected the likelihood of patients receiving care that matched their preferred care. 135 original studies were included for review. Studies used retrospective chart review (36%, n=49), questionnaire (36%, n=48) and interview (31%, n=42), focusing on both patients and proxies. Studies considered both actual care received (55%, n=74) and hypothetical scenarios anticipating possible future care (49%, n=66); some studies did both. While the reviewed studies demonstrate the possibility of working towards a solid methodology, there were significant weaknesses. Notably, studies often lacked enough reporting clarity to be reproducible and, relatedly, key concepts, such as end-of-life or preferred care, were left undefined. The recommendations that follow from these findings inform future research approaches, supporting the development of a strong evidence base to guide advance care planning implementation in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Gloeckler
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tanja Krones
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Clinical Ethics, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nikola Biller-Andorno
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Glass DP, Wang SE, Minardi PM, Kanter MH. Concordance of End-of-Life Care With End-of-Life Wishes in an Integrated Health Care System. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e213053. [PMID: 33822069 PMCID: PMC8025115 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE There is widespread consensus on the challenges to meeting the end-of-life wishes of decedents in the US. However, there is broad but not always recognized success in meeting wishes among decedents 65 years and older. OBJECTIVE To assess how well end-of-life wishes of decedents 65 years and older are met in the last year of life. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This quality improvement study involved 3 planned samples of family members or informants identified as the primary contact in the medical record of Kaiser Permanente Southern California decedents. The first sample was 715 decedents, 65 years or older, who died between April 1 and May 31, 2017. The second was a high-cost sample of 332 decedents, 65 years or older, who died between June 1, 2016, and May 31, 2017, and whose costs in the last year of life were in the top 10% of the costs of all decedents. The third was a lower-cost sample with 655 decedents whose costs were not in the top 10%. The survey was fielded between December 19, 2017, and February 8, 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Meeting end-of-life wishes, discussions with next of kin and physicians, types of discordant care, and perceptions of amount of care received. RESULTS Surveys were completed by 715 of the 2281 next of kin in the all-decedent sample (mean [SD] decedent age, 80.9 [8.9] years; 361 [50.5%] male) for a 31% response rate; in 332 of the 1339 next of kin in the high-cost sample (mean [SD] decedent age, 75.5 [7.1] years; 194 [48.4%] male) for a 25% response rate; and in 659 of 2058 in the lower-cost sample (mean [SD] decedent age, 81.6 [8.8] years) for a 32% response rate. Respondents noted that high percentages of decedents received treatment that was concordant with their desires: 601 (88.9%) had their wishes met, 39 (5.9%) received a treatment they did not want, and 554 (84.1%) filled out an advance directive. A total of 509 respondents (82.5%) believed the amount of care was the right amount. Those with the highest costs had their wishes met at lower rates than those with lower costs (250 [80.1%] vs 553 [89.6%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this Kaiser Permanente Southern California cohort, a large proportion of decedents 65 years and older had end-of-life discussions and documentation, had their wishes met, and received the amount of care they thought appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P. Glass
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California
- Department of Health Systems Science, Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California
| | - Susan E. Wang
- Life Care Planning and Serious Illness Care, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles
| | | | - Michael H. Kanter
- Department of Clinical Science, Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Modes ME, Heckbert SR, Engelberg RA, Nielsen EL, Curtis JR, Kross EK. Patient-Reported Receipt of Goal-Concordant Care Among Seriously Ill Outpatients-Prevalence and Associated Factors. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 60:765-773. [PMID: 32389606 PMCID: PMC7508896 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Goal-concordant care is an important indicator of high-quality care in serious illness. OBJECTIVES To estimate the prevalence of patient-reported receipt of goal-concordant care among seriously ill outpatients and identify factors associated with the absence of patient-reported goal concordance. METHODS Analysis of enrollment surveys from a multicenter cluster-randomized trial of outpatients with serious illness. Patients reported their prioritized health care goal and the focus of their current medical care; these items were matched to define receipt of goal-concordant care. RESULTS Of 405 patients with a prioritized health care goal, 58% reported receipt of goal-concordant care, 17% goal-discordant care, and 25% were uncertain of the focus of their care. Patient-reported receipt of goal concordance differed by patient goal. For patients who prioritized extending life, 86% reported goal-concordant care, 2% goal-discordant care, and 12% were uncertain of the focus of their care. For patients who prioritized relief of pain and discomfort, 51% reported goal-concordant care, 21% goal-discordant care, and 28% were uncertain of the focus of their care. Patients who prioritized a goal of relief of pain and discomfort were more likely to report goal-discordant care than patients who prioritized a goal of extending life (relative risk ratio 22.20; 95% CI 4.59, 107.38). CONCLUSION Seriously ill outpatients who prioritize a goal of relief of pain and discomfort are less likely to report receipt of goal-concordant care than patients who prioritize extending life. Future interventions designed to improve receipt of goal-concordant care should focus on identifying patients who prioritize relief of pain and discomfort and promoting care aligned with that goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew E Modes
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
| | - Susan R Heckbert
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ruth A Engelberg
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Nielsen
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - J Randall Curtis
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Erin K Kross
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Goals of care conversations are important but complex for clinicians caring for older adults. Although clinicians tend to focus on specific medical interventions, these conversations are more successful if they begin with gaining a shared understanding of the medical conditions and possible outcomes, followed by discussion of values and goals. Although training in the medical setting is incomplete, there are many published and online resources that can help clinicians gain these valuable skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber Comer
- School of Health and Human Sciences, Indiana University, 1050 Wishard Boulevard, RG 3034, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Lyle Fettig
- Division of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Palliative Care, Indiana University School of Medicine, Eskenazi Health, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Alexia M Torke
- Division of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Incorporated, 1101 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Comer AR, Hickman SE, Slaven JE, Monahan PO, Sachs GA, Wocial LD, Burke ES, Torke AM. Assessment of Discordance Between Surrogate Care Goals and Medical Treatment Provided to Older Adults With Serious Illness. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e205179. [PMID: 32427322 PMCID: PMC7237962 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE An important aspect of high-quality care is ensuring that treatments are in alignment with patient or surrogate decision-maker goals. Treatment discordant with patient goals has been shown to increase medical costs and prolong end-of-life difficulties. OBJECTIVES To evaluate discordance between surrogate decision-maker goals of care and medical orders and treatments provided to hospitalized, incapacitated older patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective cohort study included 363 patient-surrogate dyads. Patients were 65 years or older and faced at least 1 major medical decision in the medical and medical intensive care unit services in 3 tertiary care hospitals in an urban Midwestern area. Data were collected from April 27, 2012, through July 10, 2015, and analyzed from October 5, 2018, to December 5, 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Each surrogate's preferred goal of care was determined via interview during initial hospitalization and 6 to 8 weeks after discharge. Surrogates were asked to select the goal of care for the patient from 3 options: comfort-focused care, life-sustaining treatment, or an intermediate option. To assess discordance, the preferred goal of care as determined by the surrogate was compared with data from medical record review outlining the medical treatment received during the target hospitalization. RESULTS A total of 363 dyads consisting of patients (223 women [61.4%]; mean [SD] age, 81.8 [8.3] years) and their surrogates (257 women [70.8%]; mean [SD] age, 58.3 [11.2] years) were included in the analysis. One hundred sixty-nine patients (46.6%) received at least 1 medical treatment discordant from their surrogate's identified goals of care. The most common type of discordance involved full-code orders for patients with a goal of comfort (n = 41) or an intermediate option (n = 93). More frequent in-person contact between surrogate and patient (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.82), patient residence in an institution (AOR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23-0.82), and surrogate-rated quality of communication (AOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99) were associated with lower discordance. Surrogate marital status (AOR for single vs married, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.01-3.66), number of family members involved in decisions (AOR for ≥2 vs 0-1, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.05-3.21), and religious affiliation (AOR for none vs any, 4.87; 95% CI, 1.12-21.09) were associated with higher discordance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that discordance between surrogate goals of care and medical treatments for hospitalized, incapacitated patients was common. Communication quality is a modifiable factor associated with discordance that may be an avenue for future interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber R. Comer
- Department of Health Sciences, Indiana University School of Health and Human Sciences, Indianapolis
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis
- Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Susan E. Hickman
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis
- Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis
- Department of Community and Health Systems, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis
| | - James E. Slaven
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Patrick O. Monahan
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Greg A. Sachs
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis
- Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Lucia D. Wocial
- Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis
- Department of Community and Health Systems, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis
| | - Emily S. Burke
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis
| | - Alexia M. Torke
- Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis
- Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis
- Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Waller A, Sanson-Fisher R, Nair BR, Evans T. Preferences for End-of-Life Care and Decision Making Among Older and Seriously Ill Inpatients: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 59:187-196. [PMID: 31539600 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Older and seriously ill Australians are often admitted to hospital in the last year of their life. The extent to which these individuals have considered important aspects of end-of-life (EOL) care, including location in which care is provided, goals of care, and involvement of others in decision making, is unclear. OBJECTIVES To determine, in a sample of older and seriously ill Australian inpatients, preferences regarding location in which they receive EOL care and reasons for their choice; who is involved in EOL decisions; disclosure of life expectancy; goals of care; and voluntary-assisted dying. METHODS Cross-sectional face-to-face survey interviews conducted with 186 (80% consent) inpatients in a tertiary referral center aged 80 years and older; or aged 55 years and older with progressive chronic disease(s); or with physician-estimated life expectancy of less than 12 months. RESULTS Home care was preferred (69%), given the perceived availability of family/friends, familiarity of environment, and likelihood of having wishes respected. If unable to make decisions themselves, inpatients wanted family to decide care alone (31%) or with a doctor (49%). Of those who had not discussed life expectancy, 23% wished to. Most (76%) preferred care that maintained quality of life and relieved symptoms. There was some agreement for being sedated at the EOL (63%) and able to access medication to end life (43%). CONCLUSION Most inpatients would prefer EOL care that maintains quality and relieves suffering compared with life extension and to receive this care at home. Family involvement in resolution and documentation of EOL decisions should be prioritized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Waller
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Balakrishnan R Nair
- John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, and the University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tiffany Evans
- Clinical Research Design and Statistics Support Unit, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Waller A, Sanson-Fisher R, Nair BRK, Evans T. Are older and seriously ill inpatients planning ahead for future medical care? BMC Geriatr 2019; 19:212. [PMID: 31382893 PMCID: PMC6683455 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1211-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the perceived ethical, personal and health service benefits of advance care planning (ACP), the extent to which older and seriously ill Australian inpatients have considered future health decisions remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine in a sample of older and seriously ill inpatients, the proportion who had: 1) engaged in four advance care planning (ACP) activities; 2) not engaged in ACP activities but wanted to; and 3) reasons why they had not engaged. Methods Cross-sectional face-to-face standardised interview survey with inpatients in a tertiary referral centre who were either: aged 80+ years; aged 55+ years with progressive chronic disease(s); or judged by treating clinicians as having a life expectancy of less than 12 months. Patients indicated whether they had engaged in four ACP activities: (1) appointed medical substitute-decision-maker(s), (2) recorded end-of-life wishes in an advance directive or care plan; and talked about their end-of-life wishes with their: (3) support persons and/or (4) doctors. Patients who had not engaged in activities were asked whether they wished this to occur and reasons why. Results One hundred eighty-six inpatients consented to the study (80% of approached). Of these, 9% (n = 16) had engaged in four ACP activities; 27% (n = 50) had not engaged in any. Half (n = 94, 52%) had appointed a medical substitute-decision-maker, 27% (n = 50) had recorded wishes in an advance directive or care plan, 51% (n = 90) had talked about their end-of-life wishes with support persons and 27% (n = 48) had talked with their doctor. Patients who wanted to, but had not, engaged in the four ACP activities were unaware they could record wishes or appoint decision-makers, or indicated providers had not initiated conversations. Conclusion Relatively few inpatients had engaged in all four ACP activities. More inpatients had discussed end of life issues with family and appointed substitute decision makers, than completed written documents or talked with doctors. Community education and a more active role for community and hospital-based providers in supporting patients and families to collaboratively resolve end-of-life decisions may increase the probability wishes are known and followed. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-019-1211-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Waller
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. .,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Balakrishnan R Kichu Nair
- John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health (Medical Education and Professional Development), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Tiffany Evans
- Clinical Research Design and Statistics Support Unit, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lyon ME, Squires L, D'Angelo LJ, Benator D, Scott RK, Greenberg IH, Tanjutco P, Turner MM, Weixel TE, Cheng YI, Wang J. FAmily-CEntered (FACE) Advance Care Planning Among African-American and Non-African-American Adults Living With HIV in Washington, DC: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Documentation and Health Equity. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 57:607-616. [PMID: 30472318 PMCID: PMC6382515 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Revised: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT No prospective studies address disease-specific advance care planning (ACP) for adults living with HIV/AIDS. OBJECTIVE To examine the efficacy of FAmily-CEntered (FACE) ACP in increasing ACP and advance directive documentation in the medical record. METHODS Longitudinal, two-arm, randomized controlled trial with intent-to-treat design recruited from five hospital-based outpatient HIV clinics in Washington, DC. Adults living with HIV and their surrogate decision-makers (N = 233 dyads) were randomized to either an intensive facilitated two-session FACE ACP (Next Steps: Respecting Choices goals of care conversation and Five Wishes advance directive) or healthy living control (conversations about developmental/relationship history and nutrition). RESULTS Patients (n = 223) mean age: 51 years, 56% male, 86% African-American. One hundred ninety-nine dyads participated in the intervention. At baseline, only 13% of patients had an advance directive. Three months after intervention, this increased to 59% for the FACE ACP group versus 17% in the control group (P < 0.0001). Controlling for race, the odds of having an advance directive in the medical record in the FACE ACP group was approximately seven times greater than controls (adjusted odds ratio = 6.58, 95% CI: 3.21-13.51, P < 0.0001). Among African-Americans randomized to FACE, 58% had completed/documented advance directives versus 20% of controls (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The FACE ACP intervention significantly improved ACP completion and advance directive documentation in the medical record among both African-American and non-African-American adults living with HIV in Washington, DC, providing health equity in ACP, which can inform best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen E Lyon
- Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Children's National, Center for Translational Science/Children's Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA; George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
| | - Leah Squires
- Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Lawrence J D'Angelo
- Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Children's National, Center for Translational Science/Children's Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA; George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
| | - Debra Benator
- George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC; Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Rachel K Scott
- MedStar: Health Research Institute and Washington Hospital Center; George Washington University Milken School of Public Health, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Isabella H Greenberg
- Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Children's National, Center for Translational Science/Children's Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Patricia Tanjutco
- MedStar: Health Research Institute and Washington Hospital Center; George Washington University Milken School of Public Health, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Tara E Weixel
- Office of the Clinical Director, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Yao I Cheng
- Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Children's National, Center for Translational Science/Children's Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jichuan Wang
- Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Children's National, Center for Translational Science/Children's Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA; George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Haines L, Rahman OK, Sanders JJ, Johnson K, Kelley A. Factors That Impact Family Perception of Goal-Concordant Care at the End of Life. J Palliat Med 2019; 22:927-932. [PMID: 30758243 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Goal-concordant care (GCC)-care aligned with a patient's known goals and values-is a measure of the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care that can be assessed by surveying family members after a patient's death. It is unknown whether patient characteristics affect this measure. Objective: The objective of the article was to examine family report of GCC and its associations with patient characteristics. Methods: Using the Health and Retirement Study, which is a nationally representative, longitudinal cohort of adults over age 50, we sampled decedents whose family completed the 2014 postdeath interview. Families reported frequency of GCC at the EOL. A multivariable regression model assessed the associations between family report of GCC and decedent characteristics. Results: Of 1175 respondents, 76% reported that the decedent "usually" or "always" received GCC. Proxy report of GCC was independently associated with age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.03), having three or more chronic medical conditions (AOR 1.34, CI 1.02-1.77), the presence of written or verbal advance care planning (ACP) (AOR 1.38, CI 1.02-1.88), and an interaction term of race and ability to participate in EOL decision making (AOR 3.83, CI 1.02-14.40). African American race was not independently associated with GCC (AOR 0.73, CI 0.5-1.06). Conclusion: Family's report of GCC is associated with ACP, age, and multimorbidity. Being African American and perceived as able to participate in EOL decision making was significantly associated with report of GCC. Bringing the patient's voice into EOL care discussions through upstream ACP with likely surrogates may be particularly important to improving GCC for African Americans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Haines
- 1Department of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Omari-Khalid Rahman
- 2Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Justin J Sanders
- 3Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimberly Johnson
- 4Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.,5Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Amy Kelley
- 2Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,6James J Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cohen SM, Volandes AE, Shaffer ML, Hanson LC, Habtemariam D, Mitchell SL. Concordance Between Proxy Level of Care Preference and Advance Directives Among Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 57:37-46.e1. [PMID: 30273717 PMCID: PMC6310643 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Care consistent with goals is the desired outcome of advance care planning (ACP). OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to examine concordance between advance directives and proxy care preferences among nursing home residents with advanced dementia and to determine the impact of an ACP video on concordance. METHODS Data were from Educational Video to Improve Nursing home Care in End-stage dementia, a cluster randomized clinical trial conducted in 64 Boston-area facilities (32/arm) from 2013 to 2017. Participants included advanced dementia residents and their proxies (N = 328 dyads). At the baseline and quarterly (up to 12 months), proxies stated their preferred level of care for the resident (comfort, basic, or intensive) and advance directives for specific treatments (resuscitation, hospitalization, tube-feeding, intravenous hydration, antibiotics) were abstracted from the charts. At the baseline, proxies in intervention facilities viewed an ACP video. Their care preferences after viewing it were shared via a written communication with the primary care team. At each assessment, concordance between directives and proxy preferences was determined. RESULTS Among the residents (mean age, 86.6 years; 19.5% male), the most prevalent directive was DNR (89.3%) and foregoing antibiotics was least common (parenteral, 8.2%; any type, 4.0%). Concordance between directives and each level of care preference was as follows: comfort, 7%; basic, 49%; and intensive, 58%. When comfort care was preferred, concordance was higher in intervention versus control facilities (10.8% vs. 2.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.01-6.09). CONCLUSION Better alignment between preferences for comfort-focused care and advance directives is needed in advanced dementia. An ACP video may help achieve that goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon M Cohen
- Hebrew SeniorLife Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Angelo E Volandes
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michele L Shaffer
- Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Laura C Hanson
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel Habtemariam
- Hebrew SeniorLife Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan L Mitchell
- Hebrew SeniorLife Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
A randomised controlled trial of an advance care planning intervention for patients with incurable cancer. Br J Cancer 2018; 119:1182-1190. [PMID: 30369600 PMCID: PMC6251033 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0303-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Revised: 09/17/2018] [Accepted: 09/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We modified and evaluated an advance care planning (ACP) intervention, which had been shown to improve compliance with patient's end of life (EoL) wishes, in a different patient population. METHODS Patients with incurable cancer, and a Family Member (FM), were randomised one-to-one to usual care or usual care plus an ACP intervention, between April 2014 and January 2017. Oncologists and participants were non-blinded. ACP was based on the Respecting Patient Choices model, with an offer to provide individualised ranges for typical, best-case and worst-case scenarios for survival time. Seven facilitators (two oncology nurses, two nurses and three allied health professionals) delivered the intervention within 2 weeks of study enrolment. The primary outcome measure, assessed by interviewing the FM 3 months after patient death, was the FM perception that the patient's wishes were discussed, and met. RESULTS Six hundred and sixty-five patients from seven Australian metropolitan oncology centres were referred for consideration by their oncologists, 444 (67%) met the study inclusion criteria and were approached by a study researcher. Two hundred and eight patients (47%) and their FM entered the trial as dyads. Fifty-three (46%) dyads in the ACP group and 63 (54%) dyads in the usual-care group had complete primary outcome data (p = 0.16). Seventy-nine patients and 53 FMs attended an ACP discussion. Mean length of discussion was 57 min. FMs from 23 (43%) dyads allocated to ACP and 21 (33%) dyads allocated usual care reported the patient's EoL wishes were discussed and met (difference 10%, 95% CI: -2 to 8, p = 0.27). There were no differences in EoL care received, patient satisfaction with care; FM satisfaction with care or with death; or FM well being. Rates of palliative care referral were high in both groups (97% vs 96%). CONCLUSIONS A formal ACP intervention did not increase the likelihood that EoL care was consistent with patients' preferences.
Collapse
|
14
|
Sable-Smith A, Arnett KR, Nowels MA, Colborn K, Lum HD, Nowels D. Interactions with the healthcare system influence advance care planning activities: results from a representative survey in 11 developed countries. Fam Pract 2018; 35:307-311. [PMID: 29140508 PMCID: PMC5965096 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmx113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To identify factors associated with completion of Advance Care Planning (ACP) by patients seen in primary care in developed countries. We hypothesized that the quality of primary care is associated. METHOD We analysed respondent reported individual and healthcare utilization factors associated with the completion of ACP activities from the 2014 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey of Older Adults in 11 Countries. The primary outcome is the combined number of ACP activities completed. ACP activities included discussion of treatment preferences, documentation of healthcare wishes, or documentation of a surrogate decision maker. A quality of primary care index was calculated. RESULTS Respondents averaged 69 years old. Most were women, graduated high school, rated their income as average or higher, and rated their health as good or better. A minority reported multimorbidity, accessed the emergency department or hospital, or were informal caregivers. Out of 25530 survey respondents, 13409 (53%) reported completion of any ACP activity; 11579 (45%) had discussed treatment preferences. Generalized linear mixed model results suggest that hospitalization (rate ratio [RR] 1.18), multimorbidity (RR 1.16), informal caregiving (RR 1.13), higher education level (RR 1.14), income (RR 1.05), access to higher quality primary care (RR 1.04) and ED visits (RR 1.04) were associated with higher rates of ACP activities. Male gender (RR 0.85) and higher perceived health status (RR 0.96) were associated with lower rates. CONCLUSIONS In this international study, individuals with greater interaction with the healthcare system through hospitalization, multimorbidity, access to quality primary care and informal caregiving reported more ACP activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kelly R Arnett
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Molly A Nowels
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kathryn Colborn
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Hillary D Lum
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - David Nowels
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Correspondence to: David Nowels, Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th. Ave., Rm. 3501, Aurora, CO 80045–0508, USA; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|