1
|
Kasiri N, Banegas M, Nodora J, Martinez ME, Strong D, Doran N, McDaniels-Davidson C, Parada Jr H. Cancer stage and consideration of cannabis use among adult cancer survivors in Southern California. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2024; 2024:282-289. [PMID: 39108235 PMCID: PMC11303857 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of cannabis in symptom management among cancer survivors are widely acknowledged; however, patterns of cannabis use by cancer stage at diagnosis are unknown. METHODS Here, we examined the association between cancer stage at diagnosis and consideration of cannabis use since diagnosis. We analyzed cross-sectional survey data from 954 cancer survivors, weighted to be representative of a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center's patient population. We used survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between cancer stage at diagnosis (advanced [III/IV] versus non-advanced [I/II]) and consideration of cannabis use (yes versus no) since diagnosis. RESULTS Sixty percent of the population was diagnosed with non-advanced stages of cancer, and 42% had considered using cannabis since diagnosis. The odds of consideration of cannabis use were 63% higher (odds ratio = 1.63, 95% confidence interval = 1.06 to 2.49) among cancer survivors diagnosed at stages III/IV than among those diagnosed at stages I/II. CONCLUSION Cancer stage may be a predictor of consideration of cannabis use after diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasim Kasiri
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Banegas
- Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jesse Nodora
- Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Maria Elena Martinez
- Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - David Strong
- Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Neal Doran
- Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Psychology Service, Jennifer Moreno VA Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Corinne McDaniels-Davidson
- Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Humberto Parada Jr
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
- Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Islam JY, Nguyen OT, Turner K, Martinez YC, Rodriguez OG, Rodriguez DI, Rajasekhara S, Chang YD, Gonzalez BD, Jim HSL, Egan KM. Concurrent substance use among cancer patients with and without a history of cannabis use since cancer diagnosis at an NCI-Designated Cancer Center in Florida. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2024; 2024:224-233. [PMID: 39108241 PMCID: PMC11303859 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although substance use may have adverse impacts on cancer outcomes, little is known regarding patterns of concurrent substance use with cannabis among cancer patients. Our objective was to examine predictors of concurrent substance use with cannabis among cancer patients since their cancer diagnosis and explore perceptions of cannabis among these patients. METHODS Patients treated at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center were invited to participate in an electronic survey regarding medical cannabis from August to November 2021. Survey data were linked to internal data resources including electronic health records and patient intake forms to obtain history of substance use (defined as within at least 3 months of cancer diagnosis) of cigarettes, injection drugs, high levels of alcohol, or clinically unsupervised prescription drugs (total n = 1094). Concurrent substance users were defined as those with any reported substance use and cannabis use at the time of cancer diagnosis. We used descriptive statistics (χ2 or exact tests) to compare groups and estimated adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to identify predictors of substance use among users and nonusers of cannabis. RESULTS Approximately 45% (n = 489) of the sample reported cannabis use since their cancer diagnosis. Of patients who reported using cannabis, 20% self-reported concurrent polysubstance use, while 8% of cannabis nonusers reported substance use (P < .001). Among patients who use cannabis, those who reported 2 or more self-reported treatment-related symptoms (eg, pain, fatigue) were more likely to have self-reported concurrent substance use (AOR = 3.15, 95% CI = 1.07 to 9.27) compared with those without any symptoms. Among nonusers, those with lower educational background were more likely to have a history of concurrent substance use (AOR = 3.74, 95% CI = 1.57 to 8.92). Patients who use cannabis with concurrent substance use were more likely to report improved sleep (P = .04), increased appetite (P = .03), and treatment of additional medical conditions (P = .04) as perceived benefits of cannabis use. CONCLUSIONS High symptom burden may be associated with concurrent substance use with cannabis among cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Y Islam
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Oliver T Nguyen
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kea Turner
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Yessica C Martinez
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Omar Garcia Rodriguez
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Sahana Rajasekhara
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Young D Chang
- Department of Supportive Care Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Brian D Gonzalez
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Heather S L Jim
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kathleen M Egan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vidot DC, Baral A, Hernandez-Ortega N, Diggs BNA, Islam JY, Camacho-Rivera M, Martinez C, Penedo F. Ethnic differences in the patterns, sources, and reasons for cannabis use among cancer patients at an NCI-Designated Cancer Center. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2024; 2024:252-258. [PMID: 39108231 PMCID: PMC11303863 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to describe patterns, sources, and reasons for cannabis use among cancer patients by ethnic group. METHODS Data are from a cross-sectional study of 416 surveys collected via RedCap anonymously from adult cancer patients seen at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center within the last 5 years. A harmonized survey was created with 11 other National Cancer Institute centers to assess cannabis use patterns, sources, and reasons for use. Sociodemographics and cancer details were also collected via self-report. Descriptive statistics by ethnic group were compared using χ2 and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS Among the sample (age mean = 50.4 [15.7] years; 53% male; 8.3% lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer; 46.7% Hispanic and Latinx individuals), 69.6% reported lifetime use of cannabis, 33.7% began cannabis use after cancer diagnosis, 48.1% of those consuming cannabis did not have a prescription for cannabis, and 29.4% of cannabis users consumed daily. The frequency of cannabis use (P = .04) and reasons for cannabis use (P = .02) varied by ethnic group. Sleep and pain were the most prevalent reasons for use among the Hispanics and Latinx populations; pain, mental health management, and neuropathy were the most prevalent reasons for cannabis use among non-Hispanic White individuals. CONCLUSIONS Patterns and reasons for cannabis use differed among cancer patients by ethnic group in this exploratory cross-sectional study aimed to provide data for more rigorous study. Understanding these distinctions are pivotal in conducting more rigorous studies that address the unique needs of diverse populations utilizing cannabis for managing cancer-related symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise C Vidot
- University of Miami
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Amrit Baral
- University of Miami
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Frank Penedo
- University of Miami
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sherry DR, Patell R, Han HJ, Dodge LE, Braun IM, Buss MK. Palliative Medicine Fellows' Discussions, Perceptions, and Training Regarding Medical Cannabis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 67:471-477.e6. [PMID: 38417464 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.02.562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Medical cannabis is increasingly considered for palliation of pain, nausea/vomiting, anorexia, and other symptoms. OBJECTIVES We aimed to determine whether training in hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) adequately prepares fellows to counsel patients about medical cannabis. METHODS A previously validated questionnaire was adapted for HPM fellows. Domains included fellows' practices recommending cannabis and their knowledge of its effectiveness and risks compared with standard treatments. U.S. HPM fellowships were sent surveys in 2022 and 2023. RESULTS Forty six programs participated, 123 fellows responded (response rate of 42%) including 69% female; 55% White, and 28% Asian. Of respondents, 65% reported receiving formal training regarding medical cannabis; 57% reported discussing medical cannabis with over five patients; 23% recommended medical cannabis to more than five patients in the preceding year. Only 19%, however, felt sufficiently informed to issue cannabis-related recommendations. HPM fellows with prior training were not more likely to feel sufficiently informed to discuss cannabis (RR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.82-1.66) or to recommend cannabis to patients (RR: 2.05, 95% CI: 0.89-4.71). Fellows rate cannabis as equally or more effective than conventional treatments for the following symptoms: anorexia/cachexia (63%), nausea/vomiting (43%), pain (25%), and neuropathic pain (21%). CONCLUSION Most HPM fellows report formal training in the use of medical cannabis. Over half of trainees reported discussing medical cannabis with patients, but few considered themselves sufficiently informed to make cannabis-related clinical recommendations. These results suggest both a need for expanded high-quality evidence for medical cannabis in palliative care and for improved formal education for HPM fellows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan R Sherry
- Fox Chase Cancer Center (D.R.S.), Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Rushad Patell
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (R.P., H.J.H., L.E.D.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Harry J Han
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (R.P., H.J.H., L.E.D.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Laura E Dodge
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (R.P., H.J.H., L.E.D.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ilana M Braun
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School (I.M.B.), Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mary K Buss
- Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine (M.K.B.), Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Roberts M, Brown MRD, Moreno-Sanz G. NHS-Reimbursed Cannabis Flowers for Cancer Palliative Care and the Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: An Autobiographical Case Report. Cureus 2024; 16:e61791. [PMID: 38975420 PMCID: PMC11227119 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a debilitating side effect of cancer treatment, affecting many patients. Cannabinoid agonists, such as nabilone and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive component of Cannabis sativa L., have shown efficacy as antiemetics. Here, we report the case of Michael Roberts (MR), who we believe is the first British patient reimbursed by the National Health Service (NHS) England for the cost of medicinal cannabis flowers to manage CINV. Medical data were obtained from NHS records and individual funding request (IFR) forms. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected using validated questionnaires as part of the standard of care at the specialized private clinics where the prescription of medicinal cannabis was initiated. The patient presented with rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma with lung metastases. He received FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan) chemotherapy and underwent an emergency Hartmann's procedure with subsequent second-line FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy and lung ablation. MR reported severe nausea and vomiting associated with the initial FOLFIRI treatment. Antiemetics metoclopramide and aprepitant demonstrated moderated efficacy. Antiemetics ondansetron, levomepromazine, and nabilone were associated with intolerable side effects. Inhalation of THC-predominant cannabis flowers in association with standard medication improved CINV, anxiety, sleep quality, appetite, overall mood, and quality of life. Our results add to the available evidence suggesting that medicinal cannabis flowers may offer valuable support in cancer palliative care integrated with standard-of-care oncology treatment. The successful individual funding request in this case demonstrates a pathway for other patients to gain access to these treatments, advocating for broader awareness and integration of cannabis-based medicinal products in national healthcare services.
Collapse
|
6
|
Gurgenci T, Hardy J, Huggett G, Foster K, Pelecanos A, Greer R, Philip J, Haywood A, Mendis R, Yates P, Good P. Medicinal Cannabis (MedCan 3): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess THC/CBD (1:20) to relieve symptom burden in patients with cancer-a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2024; 25:293. [PMID: 38693590 PMCID: PMC11064296 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08091-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Distressing symptoms are common in advanced cancer. Medicinal cannabinoids are commonly prescribed for a variety of symptoms. There is little evidence to support their use for most indications in palliative care. This study aims to assess a 1:20 delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol/cannabidiol (THC/CBD) cannabinoid preparation in the management of symptom distress in patients with advanced cancer undergoing palliative care. METHODS AND DESIGN One hundred and fifty participants will be recruited across multiple sites in Queensland, Australia. A teletrial model will facilitate the recruitment of patients outside of major metropolitan areas. The study is a pragmatic, multicenter, randomised, placebo-controlled, two-arm trial of escalating doses of an oral 1:20 THC/CBD medicinal cannabinoid preparation (10 mg THC:200 mg CBD/mL). It will compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of a titrated dose range of 2.5 mg THC/50mgCBD to 30 mg THC/600 mg CBD per day against a placebo. There is a 2-week patient-determined titration phase, to reach a dose that achieves symptom relief or intolerable side effects, with a further 2 weeks of assessment on the final dose. The primary objective is to assess the effect of escalating doses of a 1:20 THC/CBD medicinal cannabinoid preparation against placebo on change in total symptom distress score, with secondary objectives including establishing a patient-determined effective dose, the effect on sleep quality and overall quality of life. Some patients will be enrolled in a sub-study which will more rigorously evaluate the effect on sleep. DISCUSSION MedCan-3 is a high-quality, adequately powered, placebo-controlled trial which will help demonstrate the utility of a THC:CBD 1:20 oral medicinal cannabis product in reducing total symptom distress in this population. Secondary outcomes may lead to new hypotheses regarding medicinal cannabis' role in particular symptoms or in particular cancers. The sleep sub-study will test the feasibility of using actigraphy and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) in this cohort. This will be the first large-scale palliative care randomised clinical trial to utilise the teletrial model in Australia. If successful, this will have significant implications for trial access for rural and remote patients in Australia and internationally. TRIAL REGISTRATION ANZCTR ACTRN12622000083796 . Protocol number 001/20. Registered on 21 January 2022. Recruitment started on 8 August 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylan Gurgenci
- Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
- Department of Supportive and Palliative Care, Mater Health, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Janet Hardy
- Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Georgie Huggett
- Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Karyn Foster
- Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Anita Pelecanos
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Patsy Yates
- Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Phillip Good
- Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Palliative Care, St Vincent's Private Hospital Brisbane, Kangaroo Point, Australia
- Department of Supportive and Palliative Care, Mater Health, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gurgenci T, Hardy J, Good C, Good P. Preliminary Results from a Phase IV Surveillance Study of Medical Cannabis Use in Australian Patients With Advanced Cancer Receiving Palliative Care. J Palliat Med 2024; 27:663-666. [PMID: 38608233 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Our research group is conducting three large randomized placebo-controlled trials of medicinal cannabis for cancer symptoms. All participants are invited to take part in a posttrial surveillance study. Methods: Participants were given the manufacturers dosing instructions and liberty to titrate to effect. Data were collected on symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS] score), perceived benefits, adverse effects, satisfaction with the product, and dose/frequency. Results: Twenty-six percent of eligible participants consented to take part in the surveillance study. Most participants changed their self-titrated dose at least once. Pain, sleep, and mood were the most frequently cited symptoms which improved. Fatigue, nausea, and cognitive impairment were the most frequently mentioned adverse effects. Conclusion: Participants felt confident making changes to their medicinal cannabis dose within the limits suggested by the manufacturer of each product. A number of benefits and adverse effects were ascribed to the product. Benefits were similar to those described in previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylan Gurgenci
- Department of Palliative Care, Cancer Services, Mater Adults Hospital Brisbane, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Janet Hardy
- Department of Palliative Care, Cancer Services, Mater Adults Hospital Brisbane, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Christopher Good
- Department of Palliative Care, Cancer Services, Mater Adults Hospital Brisbane, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Phillip Good
- Department of Palliative Care, Cancer Services, Mater Adults Hospital Brisbane, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Braun IM, Bohlke K, Abrams DI, Anderson H, Balneaves LG, Bar-Sela G, Bowles DW, Chai PR, Damani A, Gupta A, Hallmeyer S, Subbiah IM, Twelves C, Wallace MS, Roeland EJ. Cannabis and Cannabinoids in Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1575-1593. [PMID: 38478773 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To guide clinicians, adults with cancer, caregivers, researchers, and oncology institutions on the medical use of cannabis and cannabinoids, including synthetic cannabinoids and herbal cannabis derivatives; single, purified cannabinoids; combinations of cannabis ingredients; and full-spectrum cannabis. METHODS A systematic literature review identified systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and cohort studies on the efficacy and safety of cannabis and cannabinoids when used by adults with cancer. Outcomes of interest included antineoplastic effects, cancer treatment toxicity, symptoms, and quality of life. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to January 27, 2023. ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations. RESULTS The evidence base consisted of 13 systematic reviews and five additional primary studies (four RCTs and one cohort study). The certainty of evidence for most outcomes was low or very low. RECOMMENDATIONS Cannabis and/or cannabinoid access and use by adults with cancer has outpaced the science supporting their clinical use. This guideline provides strategies for open, nonjudgmental communication between clinicians and adults with cancer about the use of cannabis and/or cannabinoids. Clinicians should recommend against using cannabis or cannabinoids as a cancer-directed treatment unless within the context of a clinical trial. Cannabis and/or cannabinoids may improve refractory, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting when added to guideline-concordant antiemetic regimens. Whether cannabis and/or cannabinoids can improve other supportive care outcomes remains uncertain. This guideline also highlights the critical need for more cannabis and/or cannabinoid research.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilana M Braun
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kari Bohlke
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Donald I Abrams
- University of California San Francisco Osher Center for Integrative Health, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anuja Damani
- Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | | | | | | | - Chris Twelves
- University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Eric J Roeland
- Oregon Health and Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tradounsky GE. Gastro-Intestinal Symptoms in Palliative Care Patients. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:2341-2352. [PMID: 38668077 PMCID: PMC11049445 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31040174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
This review of the palliation of various gastro-intestinal (GI) symptoms encountered in cancer patients is by no means exhaustive. Frequent symptoms such as constipation, nausea and vomiting, bowel obstructions, ascites and bleeds will be discussed, focusing on their assessment and most importantly, how to control the associated symptoms. All of these symptoms and GI complications can significantly impact patients' quality of life (QOL) and should be treated as quickly and aggressively as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Golda Elisa Tradounsky
- Palliative Care Services, Mount Sinai Hospital, CIUSSS West Central of the Island of Montreal, 5690 Cavendish Blvd, Côte Saint-Luc, QC H4W 1S7, Canada;
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3S 1Z1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bęben D, Siwiela O, Szyjka A, Graczyk M, Rzepka D, Barg E, Moreira H. Phytocannabinoids CBD, CBG, and their Derivatives CBD-HQ and CBG-A Induced In Vitro Cytotoxicity in 2D and 3D Colon Cancer Cell Models. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2024; 46:3626-3639. [PMID: 38666957 PMCID: PMC11048930 DOI: 10.3390/cimb46040227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Phytocannabinoids, compounds found in Cannabis sativa L., are used in oncology and palliative care to reduce the adverse reactions of standard therapies. Cancer patients use formulations of Cannabis sativa L. to manage the anxiety, pain, and nausea associated with cancer treatment, and there is growing evidence that some of them may exhibit anticancer properties. In this study, we tested the anticancer potential of selected cannabinoids CBD (cannabidiol) and its quinone derivative CBD-HQ (cannabidiol hydroquinone), CBG (cannabigerol) and its acid derivative CBG-A (cannabigerolic acid), as well as a combination of CBD+CBG on the colon cancer cell line SW-620. The MTT assay was used to determine the cannabinoids' ability to induce colon cancer cell death. All cannabinoids were cytotoxic at the lowest concentration (3 μg/mL). The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) ranged from 3.90 to 8.24 μg/mL, depending on the substance. Cytotoxicity was confirmed in a 3D spheroidal cell culture with calcein and propidium iodide staining. The amount of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) was examined using a DCF-DA assay. CBG showed the lowest antioxidant activity of all the cannabinoids tested. The level of intracellular ROS decreased only by 0.7-18%. However, CBG-A induced the strongest reduction in ROS level by 31-39%. Our results suggest that cannabinoids represent an interesting research direction with great implementation potential. These preliminary results represent the beginning of research into the potential of these substances for anticancer treatment and underscore the potential for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorota Bęben
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska Street 211, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland; (D.B.); (O.S.)
| | - Oliwia Siwiela
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska Street 211, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland; (D.B.); (O.S.)
| | - Anna Szyjka
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska Street 211, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland; (A.S.); (H.M.)
| | - Michał Graczyk
- Department of Palliative Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Torun, Poland;
| | | | - Ewa Barg
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska Street 211, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland; (A.S.); (H.M.)
| | - Helena Moreira
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska Street 211, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland; (A.S.); (H.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wardill HR, Wooley LT, Bellas OM, Cao K, Cross CB, van Dyk M, Kichenadasse G, Bowen JM, Zannettino ACW, Shakib S, Crawford GB, Boublik J, Davis MM, Smid SD, Price TJ. Supporting gut health with medicinal cannabis in people with advanced cancer: potential benefits and challenges. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:19-30. [PMID: 37884682 PMCID: PMC10781684 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02466-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The side effects of cancer therapy continue to cause significant health and cost burden to the patient, their friends and family, and governments. A major barrier in the way in which these side effects are managed is the highly siloed mentality that results in a fragmented approach to symptom control. Increasingly, it is appreciated that many symptoms are manifestations of common underlying pathobiology, with changes in the gastrointestinal environment a key driver for many symptom sequelae. Breakdown of the mucosal barrier (mucositis) is a common and early side effect of many anti-cancer agents, known to contribute (in part) to a range of highly burdensome symptoms such as diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, infection, malnutrition, fatigue, depression, and insomnia. Here, we outline a rationale for how, based on its already documented effects on the gastrointestinal microenvironment, medicinal cannabis could be used to control mucositis and prevent the constellation of symptoms with which it is associated. We will provide a brief update on the current state of evidence on medicinal cannabis in cancer care and outline the potential benefits (and challenges) of using medicinal cannabis during active cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah R Wardill
- The School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- Supportive Oncology Research Group, Precision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Luke T Wooley
- The School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Olivia M Bellas
- The School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Supportive Oncology Research Group, Precision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Katrina Cao
- Supportive Oncology Research Group, Precision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Courtney B Cross
- The School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Supportive Oncology Research Group, Precision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Madele van Dyk
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders Medical Centre/Flinders University, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ganessan Kichenadasse
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders Medical Centre/Flinders University, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Northern Adelaide Local Health Network South Australia, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Joanne M Bowen
- The School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Andrew C W Zannettino
- The School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Sepehr Shakib
- The School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Gregory B Crawford
- Northern Adelaide Local Health Network South Australia, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - Mellar M Davis
- The Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA
| | - Scott D Smid
- The School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Timothy J Price
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bell BK, Liu R, Cheng S, Marchand L. Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Integrative Palliative Care. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:1719-1727. [PMID: 38060315 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Integrative medicine (IM) use is widespread among individuals living with serious illness. There is a natural alignment between the fields of IM and palliative care (PC) rooted in their shared core values. Integrative palliative care (IPC) is an emerging focus within the field of PC that aims to broaden the healing toolkit available to patients with serious illness by combining standard-of-care biomedical treatments with evidence-informed integrative and complementary medicine practices with the goal of enhancing quality of life at every stage of a person's health journey. This article is an evidence-based guide to incorporating IPC practices into the care of seriously ill individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brieze K Bell
- Divisions of Palliative Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Divisions of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Rhianon Liu
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA
| | - Stephanie Cheng
- Divisions of Palliative Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lucille Marchand
- Section of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Azizoddin DR, Cohn AM, Ulahannan SV, Henson CE, Alexander AC, Moore KN, Holman LL, Boozary LK, Sifat MS, Kendzor DE. Cannabis use among adults undergoing cancer treatment. Cancer 2023; 129:3498-3508. [PMID: 37354093 PMCID: PMC11070130 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the risks and benefits of cannabis use in the context of cancer care. This study characterized the prevalence, reasons for use, and perceived benefits of cannabis and compared symptoms and perceived risks between those who reported past 30-day cannabis use and those who did not. METHODS Adults undergoing cancer treatment at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center completed measures of sociodemographic characteristics, cannabis use, use modalities, reasons for use, perceived harms/benefits of use, physical and psychological symptoms, and other substance/medication use. Analyses compared patients who used or did not use cannabis in the past 30 days. RESULTS Participants (N = 267) were 58 years old on average, primarily female (70%), and predominantly White (88%). Over a quarter of respondents (26%) reported past 30-day cannabis use, and among those, 4.5% screened positive for cannabis use disorder. Participants who used cannabis most often used edibles (65%) or smoked cannabis (51%), and they were younger and more likely to be male, Black, and disabled, and to have lower income and Medicaid insurance than participants who did not use cannabis. Those who used cannabis reported more severe symptoms and perceived cannabis as less harmful than those who did not use cannabis. The most common medical reasons for cannabis use were pain, cancer, sleep problems, anxiety, nausea/vomiting, and poor appetite. Participants reported the greatest cannabis-related symptom relief from sleep problems, nausea/vomiting, headaches, pain, muscle spasms, and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS Patients with cancer who used cannabis perceived benefits for many symptoms, although they showed worse overall symptomatology. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Among adults undergoing cancer treatment, 26% reported cannabis use in the past 30 days. Those who used cannabis were more likely to be male and disabled and to have lower income and Medicaid insurance than those who did not use cannabis. Participants most commonly reported using cannabis for pain, cancer, sleep, anxiety, and nausea/vomiting and reported the greatest perceived benefits for sleep, nausea/vomiting, headaches, pain, muscle spasms, and anxiety, yet participants who used cannabis also reported feeling worse physically and psychologically compared to those who did not use cannabis. Participants who used cannabis were more likely to report that cannabis was less risky to their health than alcohol, smoking, and opioids than those who did not use cannabis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desiree R. Azizoddin
- Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Amy M. Cohn
- Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Susanna V. Ulahannan
- Hematology‐Oncology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Christina E. Henson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Adam C. Alexander
- Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Kathleen N. Moore
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Laura L. Holman
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Laili Kharazi Boozary
- Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
- Cellular and Behavioral Neurobiology, Department of Psychology, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Munjireen S. Sifat
- Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Darla E. Kendzor
- Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cohen T, Ezra MB, Yanai S, Oren-Azulay T, Wein S, Hamama-Raz Y. Use of Medical Cannabis by Patients With Cancer: Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practice. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023; 66:203-211.e1. [PMID: 37244526 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Demand for medical cannabis (MC) is growing among Israeli patients with cancer. OBJECTIVES The study sought to assess factors contributing to the demand for MC among patients with cancer. METHODS Patients applying for a permit to receive MC at a pain and palliative clinic of a university-affiliated cancer center in Israel in 2020-2021 were asked to complete self-report questionnaires assessing attitudes, knowledge, and expectations regarding MC use. Findings were compared between first-time and repeat applicants. Repeat applicants were asked to report their indications for requesting MC, patterns of use, and treatment effect. RESULTS The cohort included 146 patients: 63 first-time applicants and 83 repeat applicants. First-time applicants were more likely to consult sources other than their oncologist for MC-related information (P < 0.01) and expressed more concern about addiction (P < 0.001) and side effects (P < 0.05). They often erroneously assumed the treatment was subsidized (P < 0.001). Repeat applicants were younger (P < 0.05) and included more smokers (P < 0.05) and recreational cannabis users (P < 0.05); 56.6% were cancer survivors and 78% used high-potency MC. Most patients believed to some degree that MC is more effective than conventional medications for symptom control, and over half thought that MC helps to cure cancer. CONCLUSION Misconceptions regarding the effectiveness of MC for symptom management and treatment may explain the motivation of patients with cancer to apply for a permit. There seems to be an association of young age, cigarette smoking, and recreational cannabis use with ongoing use of MC among cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tzeela Cohen
- Palliative Care Service (T.C., S.Y., T.O.A., S.W.), Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel.
| | | | - Shirly Yanai
- Palliative Care Service (T.C., S.Y., T.O.A., S.W.), Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Tal Oren-Azulay
- Palliative Care Service (T.C., S.Y., T.O.A., S.W.), Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Simon Wein
- Palliative Care Service (T.C., S.Y., T.O.A., S.W.), Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Yaira Hamama-Raz
- School of Social Work (M.B.E., Y.H.R.), Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Salz T, Meza AM, Chino F, Mao JJ, Raghunathan NJ, Jinna S, Brens J, Furberg H, Korenstein D. Cannabis use among recently treated cancer patients: perceptions and experiences. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:545. [PMID: 37650961 PMCID: PMC10585595 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07994-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize cannabis use among cancer patients, we aimed to describe 1) patterns of cannabis use across multiple cancer sites; 2) perceived goals, benefits, harms of cannabis; and 3) communication about cannabis. METHODS Patients with 9 different cancers treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between March and August 2021 completed an online or phone survey eliciting cannabis use, attitudes, and communication about cannabis. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the association of cancer type and cannabis use, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and prior cannabis use. RESULTS Among 1258 respondents, 31% used cannabis after diagnosis, ranging from 25% for lung cancer to 59% for testicular cancer. Characteristics associated with cannabis use included younger age, lower education level, and cancer type. In multivariable analysis, compared to lung cancer patients, gastrointestinal cancer patients were more likely to use cannabis (odds ratio [OR] 2.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-5.43). Cannabis use in the year prior to diagnosis was strongly associated with cannabis use after diagnosis (OR 19.13, 95% CI 11.92-30.72). Among users, reasons for use included difficulty sleeping (48%); stress, anxiety, or depression (46%); and pain (42%). Among respondents who used cannabis to improve symptoms, 70-90% reported improvement; < 5% reported that any symptom worsened. Only 25% discussed cannabis with healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS Almost a third of cancer patients use cannabis, largely for symptom management. Oncologists may not know about their patients' cannabis use. To improve decision making about cannabis use during cancer care, research is needed to determine benefits and harms of cannabis use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talya Salz
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Akriti Mishra Meza
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jun J Mao
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nirupa J Raghunathan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sankeerth Jinna
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Jessica Brens
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Helena Furberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Deborah Korenstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Daoui O, Mali SN, Elkhattabi K, Elkhattabi S, Chtita S. Repositioning Cannabinoids and Terpenes as Novel EGFR-TKIs Candidates for Targeted Therapy Against Cancer: A virtual screening model using CADD and biophysical simulations. Heliyon 2023; 9:e15545. [PMID: 37128337 PMCID: PMC10148140 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023] Open
Abstract
This study examines the potential of Cannabis sativa L. plants to be repurposed as therapeutic agents for cancer treatment through designing of hybrid Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). A set of 50 phytochemicals was taken from Cannabinoids and Terpenes and subjected for screening using Semi-flexible and Flexible Molecular Docking methods, MM-GBSA free binding energy computations, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (ADME-Tox) predictions. Nine promising phytochemicals, Cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), Cannabidiol (CBD), Tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), Dronabinol (Δ-9-THC), Delta-8-Tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ-8-THC), Cannabicyclol (CBL), Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA), Beta-Caryophyllene (BCP), and Gamma-Elemene (γ-Ele) were identified as potential EGFR-TKIs natural product candidates for cancer therapy. To further validate these findings, a set of Molecular Dynamics simulations were conducted over a 200 ns trajectory. This hybrid early drug discovery screening strategy has the potential to yield a new generation of EGFR-TKIs based on natural cannabis products, suitable for cancer therapy. In addition, the application of this computational strategy in the virtual screening of both natural and synthetic chemical libraries could support the discovery of a wide range of lead drug agents to address numerous diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ossama Daoui
- Laboratory of Engineering, Systems and Applications, National School of Applied Sciences, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah-Fez University, P.O. Box 72, Fez, Morocco
- Corresponding author.
| | - Suraj N. Mali
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, India, 835215
| | - Kaouakeb Elkhattabi
- Department of Fundamental Sciences, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco
| | - Souad Elkhattabi
- Laboratory of Engineering, Systems and Applications, National School of Applied Sciences, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah-Fez University, P.O. Box 72, Fez, Morocco
| | - Samir Chtita
- Laboratory of Analytical and Molecular Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences Ben M'Sik, Hassan II University of Casablanca, P.O. Box 7955, Casablanca, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Grotenhermen F. Case in Context: Hyperhidrosis. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 2023; 8:115-118. [PMID: 36595028 DOI: 10.1089/can.2022.0265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
|