Genomics in newborn screening

Targeted gene sequencing and hearing follow-up in 7501 newborns reveals an improved strategy for newborn hearing screening

Hearing loss is a common congenital condition. Concurrent newborn hearing and limited genetic screening has been implemented in China for the last decade. However, the role of gene sequencing screening has not been evaluated. In this study, we enrolled 7501 newborns (52.7% male, 47.3% female) in our Newborn Screening with Targeted Sequencing (NESTS) program, and 90 common deafness genes were sequenced for them. Hearing status assessments were conducted via telephone from February 2021 to August 2022, for children aged 3 to 48 months. Of the universal newborn hearing screening, 126 (1.7%) newborns did not pass. Targeted sequencing identified 150 genetically positive newborns (2.0%), with 25 exhibiting dual-positive results in both screening. Following diagnostic audiometry revealed 18 hearing loss newborns and half of them had abnormal results in both screening. The positive predictive value for universal newborn hearing screening alone was merely 14.3% (18/126). However, when combined with targeted sequencing, this rate increased to 36.0% (9/25). Furthermore, limited genetic screening identified 316 carriers of hot-spot variants, but none exhibited biallelic variants. All 15 hot-spot carriers who failed physical screening demonstrated normal hearing during follow-up. In this cohort study of 7501 Newborns, Combining targeted sequencing with universal newborn hearing screening demonstrated technical feasibility and clinical utility of identifying individuals with hearing loss, especially when coupled with genetic counseling and closed-loop management. It is suggested to use this integrated method as an improved strategy instead of the current limited genetic screening program in some regions of China.

Next-generation sequencing based newborn screening and comparative analysis with MS/MS

BACKGROUND

Newborn screening (NBS), such as tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), may yield false positive/negative results. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has the potential to provide increased data output, efficiencies, and applications. This study aimed to analyze the types and distribution of pathogenic gene mutations in newborns in Huzhou, Zhejiang province, China and explore the applicability of NGS and MS/MS in NBS.

METHODS

Blood spot samples from 1263 newborns were collected. NGS was employed to screen for pathogenic variants in 542 disease-causing genes, and detected variants were validated using Sanger sequencing. Simultaneously, 26 inherited metabolic diseases (IMD) were screened using MS/MS. Positive or suspicious samples identified through MS/MS were cross-referenced with the results of NGS.

RESULTS

Among all newborns, 328 had no gene mutations detected. NGS revealed at least one gene mutation in 935 newborns, with a mutation rate of 74.0%. The top 5 genes were FLG, GJB2, UGT1A1, USH2A, and DUOX2. According to American College of Medical Genetics guidelines, gene mutations in 260 cases were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutation, with a positive rate of 20.6%. The top 5 genes were UGT1A1, FLG, GJB2, MEFV, and G6PD. MS/MS identified 18 positive or suspicious samples for IMD and 1245 negative samples. Verification of these cases by NGS results showed no pathogenic mutations, resulting in a false positive rate of 1.4% (18/1263).

CONCLUSION

NBS using NGS technology broadened the range of diseases screened, and enhanced the accuracy of diagnoses in comparison to MS/MS for screening IMD. Combining NGS and biochemical screening would improve the efficiency of current NBS.

A common benign intronic deletion masking a pathogenic deep intronic PCCB variant - genome sequencing and RNA studies to the rescue

Propionic acidemia (PA) is an autosomal recessive metabolic disorder caused by variants in PCCA or PCCB, both sub-units of the propionyl-CoA carboxylase (PCC) enzyme. PCC is required for the catabolism of certain amino acids and odd-chain fatty acids. In its absence, the accumulated toxic metabolites cause metabolic acidosis, neurologic symptoms, multi-organ dysfunction and possible death. The clinical presentation of PA is highly variable, with typical onset in the neonatal or early infantile period. We encountered two families, whose children were diagnosed with PA. Exome sequencing (ES) failed to identify a pathogenic variant, and we proceeded with genome sequencing (GS), demonstrating homozygosity to a deep intronic PCCB variant. RNA analysis established that this variant creates a pseudoexon with a premature stop codon. The parents are variant carriers, though three of them display pseudo-homozygosity due to a common large benign intronic deletion on the second allele. The parental presumed homozygosity merits special attention, as it masked the causative variant at first, which was resolved only by RNA studies. Arriving at a rapid diagnosis, whether biochemical or genetic, can be crucial in directing lifesaving care, concluding the diagnostic odyssey, and allowing the family prenatal testing in subsequent pregnancies. This study demonstrates the power of integrative genetic studies in reaching a diagnosis, utilizing GS and RNA analysis to overcome ES limitations and define pathogenicity. Importantly, it highlights that intronic deletions should be taken into consideration when analyzing genomic data, so that pseudo-homozygosity would not be misinterpreted as true homozygosity, and pathogenic variants will not be mislabeled as benign.

Newborn screening for genetic disorders: Current status and prospects for the future

Newborn screening (NBS) is a public health service aimed at identifying infants with severe genetic disorders, thus providing effective treatment early enough to prevent or ameliorate the onset of symptoms. Current NBS uses biochemical analysis of dried blood spots, predominately with time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay and tandem mass spectrometry, which produces some false positives and false negatives. The application of enzymatic activity-based testing technology provides a reliable screening method for some disorders. Genetic testing is now commonly used for secondary or confirmatory testing after a positive result in some NBS programs. Recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as a robust tool that enables large panels of genes to be scanned together rapidly. Rapid advances in NGS emphasize the potential for genomic sequencing to improve NBS programs. However, some challenges still remain and require solution before this is applied for population screening.

Les tests et le dépistage génétiques chez les enfants

Les tests génétiques, qui ont évolué rapidement depuis vingt ans, deviennent monnaie courante en pédiatrie. Le présent document de principes procure un aperçu des récents développements qui peuvent avoir des répercussions sur les tests génétiques chez les enfants. La génétique est un domaine en constante évolution, et le présent document de principes s'attarde tout particulièrement au dépistage néonatal élargi, au séquençage de nouvelle génération, aux découvertes fortuites, aux tests commercialisés directement auprès des consommateurs, aux tests d'histocompatibilité et aux tests génétiques dans le contexte de la recherche.

Genetic testing and screening in children

Genetic testing has progressed rapidly over the past two decades and is becoming common in paediatrics. This statement provides an overview of recent developments that may impact genetic testing in children. Genetics is a rapidly evolving field, and this statement focuses specifically on expanded newborn screening, next generation sequencing (NGS), incidental findings, direct-to-consumer testing, histocompatibility testing, and genetic testing in a research context.

Pregnant Latinas' views of adopting exome sequencing into newborn screening: A qualitative study

PURPOSE

There are, currently, conflicting opinions about the adoption of exome sequencing (ES) into the standard newborn screening program. This study aimed to explore the views of pregnant Latinas, a hard-to-reach, underserved, and understudied population, about pursuing ES for their newborns.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured interviews with 32 pregnant Latinas who predominately lived in rural areas and had low levels of income and education. An emergent coding approach was used to analyze the qualitative data collected.

RESULTS

Our entire sample believed that ES should be offered as a part of newborn screening, which could empower pregnant Latinas to better understand their children's health and take early treatment actions. Although some participants were concerned about potentially bad ES results and had questions about the accuracy of ES results, nearly all interviewees reported that they would be willing to have their newborns undergo ES. The main reasons given were to be informed of diseases that the baby may have, and the perception that ES is a procedure that involves minimal risk.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant Latinas in this study had favorable attitudes toward newborn ES. Their perspectives should be considered when decisions are made about incorporating ES into newborn screening.

Polygenic and Network-Based Studies in Risk Identification and Demystification of cancer

INTRODUCTION

Diseases were initially thought to be the consequence of a single gene mutation. Advances in DNA sequencing tools and our understanding of gene behavior have revealed that complex diseases, such as cancer, are the product of genes cooperating with each other and with their environment in orchestrated communication networks. Seeing that the function of individual genes is still used to analyze cancer, the shift to using functionally interacting groups of genes as a new unit of study holds promise for demystifying cancer.

AREAS COVERED

The literature search focused on three types of cancer, namely breast, lung, and prostate, but arguments from other cancers were also included. The aim was to prove that multigene analyses can accurately predict and prognosticate cancer risk, subtype cancer for more personalized and effective treatments, and discover anti-cancer therapies. Computational intelligence is being harnessed to analyze this type of data and is proving indispensable to scientific progress.

EXPERT OPINION

In the future, comprehensive profiling of all kinds of patient data (e.g., serum molecules, environmental exposures) can be used to build universal networks that should help us elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying diseases and provide appropriate preventive measures, ensuring lifelong health and longevity.

NeoSeq: a new method of genomic sequencing for newborn screening

Objective

To explore the clinical application of NeoSeq in newborn screening.

Methods

Based on the results obtained from traditional newborn screening (NBS) with tandem mass spectrometry (TMS), three cohorts were recruited into the present study: 36 true positive cases (TPC), 60 false-positive cases (FPC), and 100 negative cases. The dried blood spots of the infants were analyzed with NeoSeq, which is based on multiplex PCR amplicon sequencing.

Results

Overall, the sensitivity of NeoSeq was 55.6% (20/36) in the detection of TPC. NeoSeq detected disease-related genes in 20 of 36 TPC infants, while it could not identify these genes in eight children. Five cases (3.1%) with disease risk were additionally found in the FPC and NC cohorts. There was a significant difference in the diagnostic time between the two methods—10 days for NeoSeq vs. 43 days for traditional NBS.

Conclusions

NeoSeq is an economic genomic screening test for newborn screening. It can detect most inborn errors of metabolism, reduce the rate of false positive results, shorten the porting cycles, and reduce the screening cost. However, it is still necessary to further optimize the panel design and add more clinically relevant genomic variants to increase its sensitivity.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-021-02116-5.

The full spectrum of ethical issues in pediatric genome-wide sequencing: a systematic qualitative review

Background

The use of genome-wide sequencing in pediatric medicine and research is growing exponentially. While this has many potential benefits, the normative and empirical literature has highlighted various ethical issues. There have not been, however, any systematic reviews of these issues. The aim of this systematic review is to determine systematically the spectrum of ethical issues that is raised for stakeholders in in pediatric genome-wide sequencing.

Methods

A systematic review in PubMed and Google Books (publications in English or German between 2004 and 2021) was conducted. Further references were identified via reference screening. Data were analyzed and synthesized using qualitative content analysis. Ethical issues were defined as arising when a relevant normative principle is not adequately considered or when two principles come into conflict.

Results

Our literature search retrieved 3175 publications of which 143 were included in the analysis. Together these mentioned 106 ethical issues in pediatric genome-wide sequencing, categorized into five themes along the pediatric genome-wide sequencing lifecycle. Most ethical issues identified in relation to genome-wide sequencing typically reflect ethical issues that arise in general genetic testing, but they are often amplified by the increased quantity of data obtained, and associated uncertainties. The most frequently discussed ethical aspects concern the issue of unsolicited findings.

Conclusion

Concentration of the debate on unsolicited findings risks overlooking other ethical challenges. An overarching difficulty presents the terminological confusion: both with regard to both the test procedure/ the scope of analysis, as well as with the topic of unsolicited findings. It is important that the genetics and ethics communities together with other medical professions involved work jointly on specific case related guidelines to grant the maximum benefit for the care of the children, while preventing patient harm and disproportionate overload of clinicians and the healthcare system by the wealth of available options and economic incentives to increase testing.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-021-02830-w.

Newborn screening with targeted sequencing: a multicenter investigation and a pilot clinical study in China

Different newborn screening (NBS) programs have been practiced in many countries since the 1960s. It is of considerable interest whether next-generation sequencing is applicable in NBS. We have developed a panel of 465 causative genes for 596 early-onset, relatively high incidence, and potentially actionable severe inherited diseases in our Newborn Screening with Targeted Sequencing (NESTS) program to screen 11,484 babies in 8 Women and Children's hospitals nationwide in China retrospectively. The positive rate from preliminary screening of NESTS was 7.85% (902/11,484). With 45.89% (414/902) follow-up of preliminary positive cases, the overall clinically confirmative diagnosis rate of monogenic disorders was 12.07% (50/414), estimating an average of 0.95% (7.85% × 12.07%) clinical diagnosis rate, suggesting that monogenic disorders account for a considerable proportion of birth defects. The disease/gene spectrum varied in different regions of China. NESTS was implemented in a hospital by screening 3923 newborns to evaluate its clinical application. The turn-around time of a primary report, including the sequencing period of < 7 days, was within 11 days by our automatic interpretation pipeline. Our results suggest that NESTS is feasible and cost-effective as a first-tier NBS program, which will change the status of current clinical practice of NBS in China.

Principles of Genomic Newborn Screening Programs: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

Genomic newborn screening (gNBS) may optimize the health and well-being of children and families. Screening programs are required to be evidence based, acceptable, and beneficial.

OBJECTIVES

To identify what has been discovered following the reporting of the first gNBS pilot projects and to provide a summary of key points for the design of gNBS.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A systematic literature review was performed on April 14, 2021, identifying 36 articles that addressed the following questions: (1) what is the interest in and what would be the uptake of gNBS? (2) what diseases and genes should be included? (3) what is the validity and utility of gNBS? and (4) what are the ethical, legal, and social implications? Articles were only included if they generated new evidence; all opinion pieces were excluded.

FINDINGS

In the 36 articles included, there was high concordance, except for gene disease inclusion, which was highly variable. Key findings were the need for equitable access, appropriate educational materials, and informed and flexible consent. The process for selecting genes for testing should be transparent and reflect that parents value the certainty of prediction over actionability. Data should be analyzed in a way that minimizes uncertainty and incidental findings. The expansion of traditional newborn screening (tNBS) to identify more life-threatening and treatable diseases needs to be balanced against the complexity of consenting parents of newborns for genomic testing as well as the risk that overall uptake of tNBS may decline. The literature reflected that the right of a child to self-determination should be valued more than the possibility of the whole family benefiting from a newborn genomic test.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this systematic review suggest that implementing gNBS will require a nuanced approach. There are gaps in our knowledge, such as the views of diverse populations, the capabilities of health systems, and health economic implications. It will be essential to rigorously evaluate outcomes and ensure programs can evolve to maximize benefit.

Advancing precision public health using human genomics: examples from the field and future research opportunities

Precision public health is a relatively new field that integrates components of precision medicine, such as human genomics research, with public health concepts to help improve population health. Despite interest in advancing precision public health initiatives using human genomics research, current and future opportunities in this emerging field remain largely undescribed. To that end, we provide examples of promising opportunities and current applications of genomics research within precision public health and outline future directions within five major domains of public health: biostatistics, environmental health, epidemiology, health policy and health services, and social and behavioral science. To further extend applications of genomics within precision public health research, three key cross-cutting challenges will need to be addressed: developing policies that implement precision public health initiatives at multiple levels, improving data integration and developing more rigorous methodologies, and incorporating initiatives that address health equity. Realizing the potential to better integrate human genomics within precision public health will require transdisciplinary efforts that leverage the strengths of both precision medicine and public health.

Actionability of commercial laboratory sequencing panels for newborn screening and the importance of transparency for parental decision-making

BACKGROUND

Newborn screening aims to identify individual patients who could benefit from early management, treatment, and/or surveillance practices. As sequencing technologies have progressed and we move into the era of precision medicine, genomic sequencing has been introduced to this area with the hopes of detecting variants related to a vastly expanded number of conditions. Though implementation of genomic sequencing for newborn screening in public health and clinical settings is limited, commercial laboratories have begun to offer genomic screening panels for neonates.

METHODS

We examined genes listed on four commercial laboratory genomic screening panels for neonates and assessed their clinical actionability using an established age-based semi-quantitative metric to categorize them. We identified genes that were included on multiple panels or distinct between panels.

RESULTS

Three hundred and nine genes appeared on one or more commercial panels: 74 (23.9%) genes were included in all four commercial panels, 45 (14.6%) were on only three panels, 76 (24.6%) were on only two panels, and 114 (36.9%) genes were listed on only one of the four panels. Eighty-two genes (26.5%) listed on one or more panels were assessed by our method to be inappropriate for newborn screening and to require additional parental decision-making. Conversely, 249 genes that we previously identified as being highly actionable were not listed on any of the four commercial laboratory genomic screening panels.

CONCLUSIONS

Commercial neonatal genomic screening panels have heterogeneous content and may contain some conditions with lower actionability than would be expected for public health newborn screening; conversely, some conditions with higher actionability may be omitted from these panels. The lack of transparency about how conditions are selected suggests a need for greater detail about panel content in order for parents to make informed decisions. The nuanced activity of gene list selection for genomic screening should be iteratively refined with evidence-based approaches to provide maximal benefit and minimal harm to newborns.

Ethical and Psychosocial Implications of Genomic Newborn Screening

The potential for genomic screening of the newborn, specifically adding genomic screening to current newborn screening (NBS), raises very significant ethical issues. Regardless of whether NBS of this type would include entire genomes or only the coding region of the genome (exome screening) or even sequencing specific genes, the ethical issues raised would be enormous. These issues include the limitations of bioinformatic interpretation of identified variants in terms of pathogenicity and accurate prognosis, the potential for substantial uncertainty about appropriate diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up, the possibility of much anxiety among providers and parents, the potential for unnecessary treatment and "medicalizing" normal children, the possibility of adding large medical costs for otherwise unnecessary follow-up and testing, the potential for negatively impacting medical and life insurance, and the almost impossible task of obtaining truly-informed consent. Moreover, the potentially-negative consequences of adding genomic sequencing to NBS might jeopardize all of NBS which has been and continues to be so beneficial for thousands of children and their families throughout the world.

Next-generation sequencing of newborn screening genes: the accuracy of short-read mapping

Newborn screening programs are an integral part of public health systems aiming to save lives and improve the quality of life for infants with treatable disorders. Technological advancements have driven the expansion of newborn screening programs in the last two decades and the development of fast, accurate next-generation sequencing technology has opened the door to a range of possibilities in the field. However, technological challenges with short-read next-generation sequencing technologies remain significant in highly homologous genomic regions such as pseudogenes or paralogous genes and need to be considered when implemented in screening programs. Here, we simulate 50 genomes from populations around the world to test the extent to which high homology regions affect short-read mapping of genes related to newborn screening disorders and the impact of differential read lengths and ethnic backgrounds. We examine a 158 gene screening panel directly relevant to newborn screening and identify gene regions where read mapping is affected by homologous genomic regions at different read lengths. We also determine that the patient’s ethnic background does not have a widespread impact on mapping accuracy or coverage. Additionally, we identify newborn screening genes where alternative forms of sequencing or variant calling pipelines should be considered and demonstrate that alterations to standard variant calling can retrieve some formerly uncalled variants.

Screening for Rare Genetic Variants Associated with Atherosclerosis: Opportunity for Personalized Medicine

Atherosclerosis and its clinical manifestations is a leading cause of disease burden worldwide. Currently, most of the individuals carrying a strong predisposition to complications of atherosclerosis because of monogenic dyslipidaemias remain undiagnosed and consequently are not given an opportunity for prevention. Therefore, one of the main public health challenges remains the identification of individuals with significantly increased risk for atherosclerosis due to monogenic predisposition. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized genetic testing in symptomatic patients. Although new genomic technologies are still developing, and evidence on the use of this methodology for screening purposes is still lacking, genome testing might provide a powerful tool for the identification of individuals at risk. This may pave the way for the implementation of personalized medicine in the field of atherosclerosis prevention. In this review, we discuss the potential of genetic screening for atherosclerosis prevention and present the potential target of 17 genes responsible for monogenic dyslipidaemias associated with atherosclerosis.

Molecular based newborn screening in Germany: Follow-up for cystinosis

BACKGROUND

Newborn screening (NBS) programs for treatable metabolic disorders have been enormously successful, but molecular-based screening has not been broadly implemented so far.

METHODS

This prospective pilot study was performed within the German NBS framework. DNA, extracted from dried blood cards was collected as part of the regular NBS program. As cystinosis has a prevalence of only 1:100,000-1:200,000, a molecular genetic assay for detection of the SMN1 gene mutation with a higher prevalence was also included in the screening process, a genetic defect that leads to spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). First tier multiplex PCR was employed for both diseases. The cystinosis screening employed assays for the three most common CTNS mutations covering 75% of German patients; in case of heterozygosity for one of these mutations, samples were screened by next generation sequencing (NGS) of the CTNS exons for 101 CTNS mutations. A detection rate of 98.5% is predicted using this approach.

RESULTS

Between January 15, 2018 and May 31, 2019, 257,734 newborns were screened in Germany for cystinosis. One neonate was diagnosed with cystinosis, consistent with the known incidence of the disease. No false positive or false negatives were detected so far. Screening, communication of findings to parents, and confirmation of diagnosis were accomplished in a multi-disciplinary setting. This program was accomplished with the cooperation of hospitals, physicians, and parents. In the neonate diagnosed with cystinosis, oral cysteamine treatment began on day 18. After 16 months of treatment the child has no clinical signs of renal tubular Fanconi syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrates the efficacy of a molecular-based neonatal screening program for cystinosis using an existing national screening framework.

An Age-Based Framework for Evaluating Genome-Scale Sequencing Results in Newborn Screening

OBJECTIVE

To assess the performance of a standardized, age-based metric for scoring clinical actionability to evaluate conditions for inclusion in newborn screening and compare it with the results from other contemporary methods.

STUDY DESIGN

The North Carolina Newborn Exome Sequencing for Universal Screening study developed an age-based, semiquantitative metric to assess the clinical actionability of gene-disease pairs and classify them with respect to age of onset or timing of interventions. This categorization was compared with the gold standard Recommended Uniform Screening Panel and other methods to evaluate gene-disease pairs for newborn genomic sequencing.

RESULTS

We assessed 822 gene-disease pairs, enriched for pediatric onset of disease and suspected actionability. Of these, 466 were classified as having childhood onset and high actionability, analogous to conditions selected for the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel core panel. Another 245 were classified as having childhood onset and low to no actionability, 25 were classified as having adult onset and high actionability, 19 were classified as having adult onset and low to no actionability, and 67 were excluded due to controversial evidence and/or prenatal onset.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes a novel method to facilitate decisions about the potential use of genomic sequencing for newborn screening. These categories may assist parents and physicians in making informed decisions about the disclosure of results from voluntary genomic sequencing in children.

Updates in Newborn Screening

Newborn screening in the United States is an important public health measure to provide early detection for specified disorders when early treatment is both possible and beneficial. As technology improves, newborn screening can be offered for many more conditions. In the past 10 years, screening has expanded to include severe combined immunodeficiency, congenital heart disease, lysosomal storage disease, and X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. This article reviews the current state of newborn screening with updates on recent developments. [Pediatr Ann. 2018;47(5):e187-e190.].

Intersociety policy statement on the use of whole-exome sequencing in the critically ill newborn infant

The rapid advancement of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology and the decrease in costs for whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequening (WGS), has prompted its clinical application in several fields of medicine. Currently, there are no specific guidelines for the use of NGS in the field of neonatal medicine and in the diagnosis of genetic diseases in critically ill newborn infants. As a consequence, NGS may be underused with reduced diagnostic success rate, or overused, with increased costs for the healthcare system. Most genetic diseases may be already expressed during the neonatal age, but their identification may be complicated by nonspecific presentation, especially in the setting of critical clinical conditions. The differential diagnosis process in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) may be time-consuming, uncomfortable for the patient due to repeated sampling, and ineffective in reaching a molecular diagnosis during NICU stay. Serial gene sequencing (Sanger sequencing) may be successful only for conditions for which the clinical phenotype strongly suggests a diagnostic hypothesis and for genetically homogeneous diseases. Newborn screenings with Guthrie cards, which vary from country to country, are designed to only test for a few dozen genetic diseases out of the more than 6000 diseases for which a genetic characterization is available. The use of WES in selected cases in the NICU may overcome these issues. We present an intersociety document that aims to define the best indications for the use of WES in different clinical scenarios in the NICU. We propose that WES is used in the NICU for critically ill newborn infants when an early diagnosis is desirable to guide the clinical management during NICU stay, when a strong hypothesis cannot be formulated based on the clinical phenotype or the disease is genetically heterogeneous, and when specific non-genetic laboratory tests are not available. The use of WES may reduce the time for diagnosis in infants during NICU stay and may eventually result in cost-effectiveness.

Next generation sequencing as a follow-up test in an expanded newborn screening programme

OBJECTIVES

Contrary to many western European countries, most south-eastern European countries do not have an expanded newborn screening (NBS) program using tandem mass spectrometry. This study would represent one of the first expanded NBS studies in south-eastern Europe and will enable the estimation of the incidences of IEM in Slovenia. We proposed an expanded NBS approach including next-generation sequencing (NGS) as a confirmational analysis.

DESIGN & METHODS

We conducted a pilot study of expanded NBS for selected inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) in Slovenia including 10,048 NBS cards. We used an approach including tandem mass spectrometry followed by second tier tests including NGS. Based on the NBS results, 85 children were evaluated at a metabolic follow-up; 80 of them were analyzed using NGS.

RESULTS

Altogether, glutaric acidemia type 1 was confirmed in one patient who was a compound heterozygote for two known causative GCDH variants. A patient with suspected very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency had negative metabolic follow-up tests, but had two heterozygous ACADVL variants; one known disease-causing variant and one indel, namely c.205-8_205-7delinsGC, that is predicted to be causative. Nine participants had elevated metabolites characteristic of 3-methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase deficiency, 2 of them had known causative homozygous variants in MCCC1. The other seven were heterozygous; two had a novel genetic variant c.149_151dupCCA (p.Thr50dup). Cumulative incidences of IEM in Slovenia were similar to other European countries.

CONCLUSIONS

NGS proved to be valuable in explaining the abnormal metabolite concentrations in NBS as it enabled the differentiation between affected patients and mere heterozygotes, and it improved the turnaround time of genetic analysis. The results of this study will be instrumental in the routine implementation of expanded NBS in Slovenia.

Prevalence of Rare Genetic Variations and Their Implications in NGS-data Interpretation

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has improved enough to discover mutations associated with genetic diseases. Our study evaluated the feasibility of targeted NGS as a primary screening tool to detect causal variants and subsequently predict genetic diseases. We performed parallel computations on 3.7-megabase-targeted regions to detect disease-causing mutations in 103 participants consisting of 81 patients and 22 controls. Data analysis of the participants took about 6 hours using local databases and 200 nodes of a supercomputer. All variants in the selected genes led on average to 3.6 putative diseases for each patient while variants restricted to disease-causing genes identified the correct disease. Notably, only 12% of predicted causal variants were recorded as causal mutations in public databases: 88% had no or insufficient records. In this study, most genetic diseases were caused by rare mutations and public records were inadequate. Most rare variants, however, were not associated with genetic diseases. These data implied that novel, rare variants should not be ignored but interpreted in conjunction with additional clinical data. This step is needed so appropriate advice can be given to primary doctors and parents, thus fulfilling the purpose of this method as a primary screen for rare genetic diseases.

Whole-Exome Sequencing for Diagnosis of Turner Syndrome: Toward Next-Generation Sequencing and Newborn Screening

CONTEXT

Turner syndrome (TS) is due to a complete or partial loss of an X chromosome in female patients and is not currently part of newborn screening (NBS). Diagnosis is often delayed, resulting in missed crucial diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine if whole-exome sequencing (WES) as part of a potential NBS program could be used to diagnose TS.

DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS

Karyotype, chromosomal microarray, and WES were performed on blood samples from women with TS (n = 27) enrolled in the Personalized Genomic Research study at the National Institutes of Health. Female control subjects (n = 37) and male subjects (n = 27) also underwent WES. Copy number variation was evaluated using EXCAVATOR2 and B allele frequency was calculated from informative single nucleotide polymorphisms. Simulated WES data were generated for detection of low-level mosaicism and complex structural chromosome abnormalities.

RESULTS

We detected monosomy for chromosome X in all 27 TS samples, including 1 mosaic for 45,X/46,XX and another with previously unreported material on chromosome Y. Sensitivity and specificity were both 100% for the diagnosis of TS with no false-positive or false-negative results. Using simulated WES data, we detected isochromosome Xq and low-level mosaicism as low as 5%.

CONCLUSION

We present an accurate method of diagnosing TS using WES, including cases with low-level mosaicism, isochromosome Xq, and cryptic Y-chromosome material. Given the potential use of next-generation sequencing for NBS in many different diseases and syndromes, we propose WES can be used as a screening test for TS in newborns.

Long-term outcome of expanded newborn screening at Boston children's hospital: benefits and challenges in defining true disease

INTRODUCTION

There is no universal consensus of the disorders included in newborn screening programs. Few studies so far, mostly short-term, have compared the outcome of disorders detected by expanded newborn screening (ENBS) to the outcome of the same disorders detected clinically.

METHODS

We compared the clinical and neurodevelopmental outcomes in patients with metabolic disorders detected by ENBS, including biotinidase testing, with those detected clinically and followed at the Metabolism Clinic at Boston Children's Hospital.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-nine patients came to attention from ENBS and 142 were clinically diagnosed. 3-methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase, biotinidase, and carnitine deficiencies were exclusively identified by ENBS and medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCADD) and very long chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiencies (VLCADD) were predominantly identified by ENBS whereas the organic acid disorders more often came to attention clinically. Only 2% of the ENBS-detected cases had clinically severe outcomes compared to 42% of those clinically detected. The mean IQ score was 103 + 17 for the ENBS-detected cases and 77 + 24 for those clinically detected. Those newly included disorders that seem to derive the greatest benefit from ENBS include the fatty acid oxidation disorders, profound biotinidase deficiency, tyrosinemia type 1, and perhaps carnitine deficiency.

CONCLUSION

Although the NBS-identified and clinically-identified cohorts were not completely comparable, this long-term study shows likely substantial improvement overall in the outcome of these metabolic disorders in the NBS infants. Infants with mild disorders and benign variants may represent a significant number of infants identified by ENBS. The future challenge will be to unequivocally differentiate the disorders most benefitting from ENBS and adjust programs accordingly.

Genomic newborn screening: public health policy considerations and recommendations

BACKGROUND

The use of genome-wide (whole genome or exome) sequencing for population-based newborn screening presents an opportunity to detect and treat or prevent many more serious early-onset health conditions than is possible today.

METHODS

The Paediatric Task Team of the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health's Regulatory and Ethics Working Group reviewed current understanding and concerns regarding the use of genomic technologies for population-based newborn screening and developed, by consensus, eight recommendations for clinicians, clinical laboratory scientists, and policy makers.

RESULTS

Before genome-wide sequencing can be implemented in newborn screening programs, its clinical utility and cost-effectiveness must be demonstrated, and the ability to distinguish disease-causing and benign variants of all genes screened must be established. In addition, each jurisdiction needs to resolve ethical and policy issues regarding the disclosure of incidental or secondary findings to families and ownership, appropriate storage and sharing of genomic data.

CONCLUSION

The best interests of children should be the basis for all decisions regarding the implementation of genomic newborn screening.

Challenges for Worldwide Harmonization of Newborn Screening Programs

BACKGROUND

Inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs) are caused by a defect in a metabolic pathway, leading to malfunctioning metabolism and/or the accumulation of toxic intermediate metabolites. To date, hundreds of IMDs have been identified. Many of these diseases are potentially fatal conditions that are not apparent at birth. Newborn screening (NBS) programs involve the clinical and laboratory examination of neonates who exhibit no health problems, with the aim of discovering those infants who are, in fact, suffering from a treatable condition.

CONTENT

In recent years, the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry has allowed the expansion of screening programs. However, this expansion has brought a high degree of heterogeneity in the IMDs tested among different NBS programs. An attempt to harmonize the metabolic conditions recommended to be screened has been carried out. Two uniform screening panels have been proposed in the US and European Union, by knowledgeable organizations. Here, we review current evidence-based processes to assess and expand NBS programs. We also discuss the IMDs that have recently been introduced in some screening programs, such as severe combined immunodeficiencies, lysosomal storage disorders, and adrenoleukodystrophy.

SUMMARY

NBS programs have been an established public health function for more than 50 years to efficiently and cost-effectively identify neonates with severe conditions. However, NBS is not yet optimal. This review is intended to elucidate the current degree of harmonization of NBS programs worldwide as well as to describe the major controversial points and discuss the multiple challenges that must be confronted in expanded NBS strategies.

Parental Views on Expanded Newborn Screening Using Whole-Genome Sequencing

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The potential application of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to state-mandated standard newborn screening (NBS) challenges the traditional public health approach to NBS and raises ethical, policy, and clinical practice issues. This article examines the perspectives and values of diverse healthy pregnant women and parents of children diagnosed with a primary immunodeficiency disorder about traditional NBS and expanded NBS with the use of WGS.

METHODS

We conducted 4 focus groups (3 in English and 1 in Spanish) with socioeconomically and ethnically diverse pregnant women (n = 26), and a comparison group with parents of children diagnosed with a primary immunodeficiency disorder (n = 5).

RESULTS

Pediatric policy-relevant themes that emerged from our analysis of the focus group data are presented within 4 categories: (1) perspectives on traditional NBS, (2) informed consent, (3) return of results, and (4) storage and retrieval of results. Analyses indicate that study participants desired greater inclusion in the NBS process. Despite an optimistic orientation to the potential benefits and limited harms likely to result from genomic applications of NBS, parents voiced concerns about privacy and control over test results. Limited trust in the medical system and the state-run NBS program informed these concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Expanded NBS with WGS for pediatricians may require management of more genetic conditions, including mutations that convey risk to both the child and parents for adult-onset disorders, and an informed-consent process to manage the genomic data and storage of blood spots. Attention to how these technologies are understood in diverse populations is needed for effective implementation.

Whole-Genome Screening of Newborns? The Constitutional Boundaries of State Newborn Screening Programs

State newborn screening (NBS) programs routinely screen nearly all of the 4 million newborns in the United States each year for ∼30 primary conditions and a number of secondary conditions. NBS could be on the cusp of an unprecedented expansion as a result of advances in whole-genome sequencing (WGS). As WGS becomes cheaper and easier and as our knowledge and understanding of human genetics expand, the question of whether WGS has a role to play in state NBS programs becomes increasingly relevant and complex. As geneticists and state public health officials begin to contemplate the technical and procedural details of whether WGS could benefit existing NBS programs, this is an opportune time to revisit the legal framework of state NBS programs. In this article, we examine the constitutional underpinnings of state-mandated NBS and explore the range of current state statutes and regulations that govern the programs. We consider the legal refinements that will be needed to keep state NBS programs within constitutional bounds, focusing on 2 areas of concern: consent procedures and the criteria used to select new conditions for NBS panels. We conclude by providing options for states to consider when contemplating the use of WGS for NBS.

Addressing Benefits, Risks and Consent in Next Generation Sequencing Studies

The sequencing of the human genome and technological advances in DNA sequencing have led to a revolution with respect to DNA sequencing and its potential to diagnose genetic disorders. However, requests for open access to genomic data must be balanced against the guiding principles of the Common Rule for human subject research. Unfortunately, the risks to patients involved in genomic studies are still evolving and as such may not be clear to learned and well-intentioned scientists. Central to this issue are the strategies that enable human participants in such studies to remain anonymous, or de-identified. The wealth of genomic data on the Internet in genomic data repositories and other databases has enabled de-identified data to be broken and research subjects to be identified. The security of de-identification neglects the fact that DNA itself is an identifying element. Therefore, it is questionable whether data security standards can ever truly protect the identity of a patient, under the current conditions or in the future. As Big Data methodologies advance, additional sources of data may enable the re-identification of patients enrolled in next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies. As such, it is time to re-evaluate the risks of sharing genomic data and establish new guidelines for good practices. In this commentary, I address the challenges facing federally funded investigators who need to strike a balance between compliance with federal (US) rules for human subjects and the recent requirement for open access/sharing of data from National Institute for Health (NIH)-funded studies involving human subjects.

Can we afford to sequence every newborn baby's genome?

Whole-exome sequencing and whole-genome sequencing are gradually entering into the clinical arena. Drops in sequencing prices have led some to suggest that these analyses could be extended to the screening of whole populations or subsets thereof. Herein, we argue that this optimism is presently still unfounded. While cost estimates take into account the generation of sequence data, they fail to properly evaluate both the price of accurate and efficient interpretation and of the proper return of genomic information to the consulting individuals. Thus, short of inventing new, cost-effective ways of achieving these goals, the latter are likely to ruin our healthcare systems. We posit that due to lack of available resources, generalization of this practice remains, for the time being, unrealistic.

Challenges of using next generation sequencing in newborn screening

Whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing for clinical applications is now an integral part of medical genetics practice. The term newborn screening refers to public health programs designed to screen newborns for various treatable metabolic conditions, by measuring levels of circulating blood metabolites. The availability and significant decrease in sequencing costs has raised the question of whether metabolic newborn screening should be replaced by whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing. While newborn genome sequencing can potentially increase the number of disorders identified by newborn screening, the generalization of its practice raises a number of important ethical issues. This short article argues that there are medical, psychological, ethical and economic reasons why widespread dissemination of newborn screening is still premature.

Biotinidase deficiency: Spectrum of molecular, enzymatic and clinical information from newborn screening Ontario, Canada (2007-2014)

Untreated profound biotinidase deficiency results in a wide range of clinical features, including optic atrophy, cutaneous abnormalities, hearing loss and developmental delay. Ontario, Canada incorporated this treatable deficiency in newborn screening over the past 8years. This study elucidates the molecular, biochemical, and clinical findings from the pilot project. Information from initial screens, serum biotinidase activity level assays, molecular testing, and family history for 246 positive newborns screens were analyzed. A mutation spectrum was created for the province of Ontario, including common mutations such as D444H, D444H/A171T, Q456H, C33fs, and R157H. Individuals with partial deficiency were separated into 3 groups: D444H homozygotes (Group 1); compound heterozygotes for D444H with another profound allele (Group 2); compound heterozygotes with two non-D444H alleles (Group 3). Biochemical phenotype-genotype associations in partial deficiency showed a significant difference in serum biotinidase activity in between any given two groups. Three children with partial deficiency discontinued biotin for varied lengths of time. Two of whom became symptomatic with abnormal gait, alopecia, skin rashes and developmental delay. A need for more congruency in diagnostic, treatment and educational practices was highlighted across the province. Heterogeneity and variation in clinical presentations and management was observed in patients with the partial deficiency.

Utility of whole-genome sequencing for detection of newborn screening disorders in a population cohort of 1,696 neonates

PURPOSE

To assess the potential of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to replicate and augment results from conventional blood-based newborn screening (NBS).

METHODS

Research-generated WGS data from an ancestrally diverse cohort of 1,696 infants and both parents of each infant were analyzed for variants in 163 genes involved in disorders included or under discussion for inclusion in US NBS programs. WGS results were compared with results from state NBS and related follow-up testing.

RESULTS

NBS genes are generally well covered by WGS. There is a median of one (range: 0-6) database-annotated pathogenic variant in the NBS genes per infant. Results of WGS and NBS in detecting 28 state-screened disorders and four hemoglobin traits were concordant for 88.6% of true positives (n = 35) and 98.9% of true negatives (n = 45,757). Of the five infants affected with a state-screened disorder, WGS identified two whereas NBS detected four. WGS yielded fewer false positives than NBS (0.037 vs. 0.17%) but more results of uncertain significance (0.90 vs. 0.013%).

CONCLUSION

WGS may help rule in and rule out NBS disorders, pinpoint molecular diagnoses, and detect conditions not amenable to current NBS assays.

Defining "mutation" and "polymorphism" in the era of personal genomics

BACKGROUND

The growing advances in DNA sequencing tools have made analyzing the human genome cheaper and faster. While such analyses are intended to identify complex variants, related to disease susceptibility and efficacy of drug responses, they have blurred the definitions of mutation and polymorphism.

DISCUSSION

In the era of personal genomics, it is critical to establish clear guidelines regarding the use of a reference genome. Nowadays DNA variants are called as differences in comparison to a reference. In a sequencing project Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and DNA mutations are defined as DNA variants detectable in >1 % or <1 % of the population, respectively. The alternative use of the two terms mutation or polymorphism for the same event (a difference as compared with a reference) can lead to problems of classification. These problems can impact the accuracy of the interpretation and the functional relationship between a disease state and a genomic sequence. We propose to solve this nomenclature dilemma by defining mutations as DNA variants obtained in a paired sequencing project including the germline DNA of the same individual as a reference. Moreover, the term mutation should be accompanied by a qualifying prefix indicating whether the mutation occurs only in somatic cells (somatic mutation) or also in the germline (germline mutation). We believe this distinction in definition will help avoid confusion among researchers and support the practice of sequencing the germline and somatic tissues in parallel to classify the DNA variants thus defined as mutations.

Development of DNA confirmatory and high-risk diagnostic testing for newborns using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing

PURPOSE

Genetic testing is routinely used for second-tier confirmation of newborn sequencing results to rule out false positives and to confirm diagnoses in newborns undergoing inpatient and outpatient care. We developed a targeted next-generation sequencing panel coupled with a variant processing pipeline and demonstrated utility and performance benchmarks across multiple newborn disease presentations in a retrospective clinical study.

METHODS

The test utilizes an in silico gene filter that focuses directly on 126 genes related to newborn screening diseases and is applied to the exome or a next-generation sequencing panel called NBDx. NBDx targets the 126 genes and additional newborn-specific disorders. It integrates DNA isolation from minimally invasive biological specimens, targeted next-generation screening, and rapid characterization of genetic variation.

RESULTS

We report a rapid parallel processing of 8 to 20 cases within 105 hours with high coverage on our NBDx panel. Analytical sensitivity of 99.8% was observed across known mutation hotspots. Concordance calls with or without clinical summaries were 94% and 75%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Rapid, automated targeted next-generation sequencing and analysis are practical in newborns for second-tier confirmation and neonatal intensive care unit diagnoses, laying a foundation for future primary DNA-based molecular screening of additional disorders and improving existing molecular testing options for newborns.

Parents are interested in newborn genomic testing during the early postpartum period

PURPOSE

We surveyed parents to ascertain interest in newborn genomic testing and determine whether these queries would provoke refusal of conventional state-mandated newborn screening.

METHODS

After a brief genetics orientation, parents rated their interest in receiving genomic testing for their healthy newborn on a 5-point Likert scale and answered questions about demographics and health history. We used logistic regression to explore factors associated with interest in genomic testing and tracked any subsequent rejection of newborn screening.

RESULTS

We queried 514 parents within 48 hours after birth while still in hospital (mean age (SD) 32.7 (6.4) years, 65.2% female, 61.2% white, 79.3% married). Parents reported being not at all (6.4%), a little (10.9%), somewhat (36.6%), very (28.0%), or extremely (18.1%) interested in genomic testing for their newborns. None refused state-mandated newborn screening. Married participants and those with health concerns about their infant were less interested in newborn genomic testing (P = 0.012 and P = 0.030, respectively). Degree of interest for mothers and fathers was discordant (at least two categories different) for 24.4% of couples.

CONCLUSION

Interest in newborn genomic testing was high among parents of healthy newborns, and the majority of couples had similar levels of interest. Surveying parents about genomic sequencing did not prompt rejection of newborn screening.Genet Med 17 6, 501-504.

Genetics professionals' opinions of whole-genome sequencing in the newborn period

Newborn screening (NBS) programs have been successful in identifying infants with rare, treatable, congenital conditions. While current programs rely largely on biochemical analysis, some predict that in the future, genome sequencing may be used as an adjunct. The purpose of this exploratory pilot study was to begin to characterize genetics professionals' opinions of the use of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in NBS. We surveyed members of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) via an electronic survey distributed through email. The survey included questions about results disclosure, the current NBS paradigm, and the current criteria for adding a condition to the screening panel. The response rate was 7.3 % (n = 113/1549). The majority of respondents (85 %, n = 96/113) felt that WGS should not be currently used in NBS, and that if it were used, it should not be mandatory (86.5 %, n = 96/111). However, 75.7 % (n = 84/111) foresee it as a future use of WGS. Respondents felt that accurate interpretation of results (86.5 %, n = 83/96), a more extensive consent process (72.6 %, n = 69/95), pre- (79.2 %, n = 76/96) and post-test (91.6 %, n = 87/95) counseling, and comparable costs (70.8 %, n = 68/96) and turn-around-times (64.6 %, n = 62/96) to current NBS would be important for using WGS in NBS. Participants were in favor of disclosing most types of results at some point in the lifetime. However, the majority (87.3 %, n = 96/110) also indicated that parents should be able to choose what results are disclosed. Overall, respondents foresee NBS as a future use of WGS, but indicated that WGS should not occur within the framework of traditional NBS. They agreed with the current criteria for including a condition on the recommended uniform screening panel (RUSP). Further discussion about these criteria is needed in order to better understand how they could be utilized if WGS is incorporated into NBS.

Hyperhomocysteinemia: related genetic diseases and congenital defects, abnormal DNA methylation and newborn screening issues

Homocysteine, a sulfur-containing amino acid derived from the methionine metabolism, is located at the branch point of two pathways of the methionine cycle, i.e. remethylation and transsulfuration. Gene abnormalities in the enzymes catalyzing reactions in both pathways lead to hyperhomocysteinemia. Hyperhomocysteinemia is associated with increased risk for congenital disorders, including neural tube closure defects, heart defects, cleft lip/palate, Down syndrome, and multi-system abnormalities in adults. Since hyperhomocysteinemia is known to affect the extent of DNA methylation, it is likely that abnormal DNA methylation during embryogenesis, may be a pathogenic factor for these congenital disorders. In this review we highlight the importance of homocysteinemia by describing the genes encoding for enzymes of homocysteine metabolism relevant to the clinical practice, especially cystathionine-β-synthase and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutations, and the impairment of related metabolites levels. Moreover, a possible correlation between hyperhomocysteine and congenital disorders through the involvement of abnormal DNA methylation during embryogenesis is discussed. Finally, the relevance of present and future diagnostic tools such as tandem mass spectrometry and next generation sequencing in newborn screening is highlighted.

Molecular genetics and diagnosis of phenylketonuria: state of the art

Detection of individuals with phenylketonuria (PKU), an autosomal recessively inherited disorder in phenylalanine degradation, is straightforward and efficient due to newborn screening programs. A recent introduction of the pharmacological treatment option emerged rapid development of molecular testing. However, variants responsible for PKU do not all suppress enzyme activity to the same extent. A spectrum of over 850 variants, gives rise to a continuum of hyperphenylalaninemia from very mild, requiring no intervention, to severe classical PKU, requiring urgent intervention. Locus-specific and genotypes database are today an invaluable resource of information for more efficient classification and management of patients. The high-tech molecular methods allow patients' genotype to be obtained in a few days, especially if each laboratory develops a panel for the most frequent variants in the corresponding population.

Stakeholder consultation insights on the future of genomics at the clinical-public health interface

In summer 2011, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office of Public Health Genomics conducted a stakeholder consultation, administered by the University of Michigan Center for Public Health and Community Genomics, and Genetic Alliance, to recommend priorities for public health genomics from 2012 through 2017. Sixty-two responses from health professionals, administrators, and members of the public were pooled with 2 sets of key informant interviews and 3 discussion groups. NVivo 9 and manual methods were used to organize themes. This review offers an interim analysis of progress with respect to the final recommendations, which demonstrated a strong interest in moving genomic discoveries toward implementation and comparative effectiveness (T3/T4) translational research. A translational research continuum exists with familial breast and ovarian cancer at one end and prostate cancer at the other. Cascade screening for inherited arrhythmia syndromes and hypercholesterolemia lags stakeholder recommendations in the United States but not in Europe; implementation of health service-based screening for Lynch syndrome, and integration into electronic health information systems, is on pace with the recommended timeline. A number of options exist to address deficits in the funding of translational research, particularly for oncogenomic gene expression profiling. The goal of personalized risk assessment necessitates both research progress (eg, in whole genome sequencing, as well as provider education in the differentiation of low- vs high-risk status. The public health approach supports an emphasis on genetic test validation while endorsing clinical translation research inclusion of an environmental and population-based perspective.