A Cohort Comparison of Buprenorphine versus Methadone Treatment for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome

The effects of buprenorphine and morphine during pregnancy: Impact of exposure length on maternal brain, behavior, and offspring neurodevelopment

The escalating incidence of opioid-related issues among pregnant women in the United States underscores the critical necessity to understand the effects of opioid use and Medication for Opioid Use Disorders (MOUDs) during pregnancy. This research employed a translational rodent model to examine the impact of gestational exposure to buprenorphine (BUP) or morphine on maternal behaviors and offspring well-being. Female rats received BUP or morphine before conception, representing established use, with exposure continuing until postnatal day 2 or discontinued on gestational day 19 to mimic treatment cessation before birth. Maternal behaviors - including care, pup retrieval, and preference - as well as hunting behaviors and brain neurotransmitter levels were assessed. Offspring were evaluated for mortality, weight, length, milk bands, surface righting latency, withdrawal symptoms, and brain neurotransmitter levels. Our results reveal that regardless of exposure length (i.e., continued or discontinued), BUP resulted in reduced maternal care in contrast to morphine-exposed and control dams. Opioid exposure altered brain monoamine levels in the dams and offspring, and was associated with increased neonatal mortality, reduced offspring weight, and elevated withdrawal symptoms compared to controls. These findings underscore BUP's potential disruption of maternal care, contributing to increased pup mortality and altered neurodevelopmental outcomes in the offspring. This study calls for more comprehensive research into prenatal BUP exposure effects on the maternal brain and infant development with the aim to mitigate adverse outcomes in humans exposed to opioids during pregnancy.

Buprenorphine vs. morphine: impact on neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) outcomes in a single center retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical outcomes for infants with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) treated with buprenorphine or morphine.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of infants born ≥35 weeks' gestation and admitted to the NICU for NOWS treatment between 2011 and 2022. Length of treatment, length of stay in the hospital, and the need for secondary medications were compared between buprenorphine and morphine treated neonates. Multiple regression analysis was performed, adjusting for baseline differences and confounders.

RESULTS

417 neonates were treated with morphine and 232 with buprenorphine. The buprenorphine group had shorter treatment days [-10.8 days; 95% CI: -8.08 to -13.53] and shorter hospital stay [-11.8 days; 95% CI: -8.83 to -14.78]. The buprenorphine group was no more likely to receive phenobarbital or clonidine (26% vs. 29%).

CONCLUSION

In this large single-center study, buprenorphine was associated with shorter lengths of treatment and hospital stay in the treatment of NOWS compared to morphine.

Advances in animal models of prenatal opioid exposure

Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) is a growing public health concern. The complexity of in utero opioid exposure in clinical studies makes it difficult to investigate underlying mechanisms that could ultimately inform early diagnosis and treatments. Clinical studies are unable to dissociate the influence of maternal polypharmacy or the environment from direct effects of in utero opioid exposure, highlighting the need for effective animal models. Early animal models of prenatal opioid exposure primarily used the prototypical opioid, morphine, and opioid exposure that was often limited to a narrow period during gestation. In recent years, the number of preclinical studies has grown rapidly. Newer models utilize both prescription and nonprescription opioids and vary the onset and duration of opioid exposure. In this review, we summarize novel prenatal opioid exposure models developed in recent years and attempt to reconcile results between studies while critically identifying gaps within the current literature.

Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome in Infants with Prenatal Exposure to Methadone versus Buprenorphine

Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) has been of increasing concern. Studies suggest that prenatal exposure to buprenorphine may be preferred to methadone in regard to neonatal withdrawal. Our aim was to determine whether the incidence and severity of NAS are different between babies prenatally exposed to methadone or buprenorphine in pregnancy. This retrospective analysis of infants ≥ 35-weeks-old exposed to methadone/buprenorphine alone or in conjunction with other substances in utero. They were divided into four groups: 1-methadone alone (Met), 2-buprenorphine alone (Bup), 3 and 4-those exposed to methadone and buprenorphine, respectively, in conjunction with other drugs (Met+ and Bup+). The frequency of NAS treatment, duration of treatment (LOT) and length of stay (LOS) were compared between groups. Of the 290 mothers, 59% were in the Met group, 18% in the Bup group, 14% in the Met or Bup and another opiate group, and 9% took methadone or buprenorphine plus various other substances. Infants born to Met/Met+ mothers had a four-times higher likelihood of developing NAS (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the LOS (p = 0.08) or LOT (p = 0.11) between groups. The buprenorphine treatment in pregnancy decreased the risk of babies developing NAS. However, once the NAS required pharmacological treatment, the type of maternal prenatal exposure did not affect the LOS or LOT.

Gestational buprenorphine exposure disrupts dopamine neuron activity and related behaviors in adulthood

Opioid misuse among pregnant women is rapidly increasing in the United States. The number of maternal opioid-related diagnoses increased by 131% in the last ten years, resulting in an increased number of infants exposed to opioids in utero and a subsequent increase in infants developing neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). The most prescribed treatment to combat maternal opioid use disorder is buprenorphine, a partial μ-opioid receptor agonist and κ-opioid receptor antagonist. Buprenorphine treatment effectively reduces NAS but has been associated with disrupted cortical development and neurodevelopmental consequences in childhood. Less is known about the long-term neurodevelopmental consequences following buprenorphine exposure in utero Previous research has shown that gestational buprenorphine exposure can induce anxiety- and depressive-like phenotypes in adult rats, suggesting that exposure to buprenorphine in utero may render individuals more susceptible to psychiatric illness in adulthood. A common pathology observed across multiple psychiatric illnesses is dopamine system dysfunction. Here, we administered the highly-abused opioid, oxycodone (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or a therapeutic used to treat opioid use disorder, buprenorphine (1 mg/kg, i.p) to pregnant Sprague Dawley rats from gestational day 11 through 21, then examined neurophysiological alterations in the mesolimbic dopamine system and dopamine-dependent behaviors in adult offspring. We found that gestational exposure to buprenorphine or oxycodone increases dopamine neuron activity in adulthood. Moreover, prenatal buprenorphine exposure disrupts the afferent regulation of dopamine neuron activity in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Taken together, we posit that gestational buprenorphine or oxycodone exposure can have profound effects on the mesolimbic dopamine system in adulthood.Significance StatementThe opioid epidemic in the United States is a growing problem that affects people from all demographics, including pregnant women. In 2017, nearly 21,000 pregnant women reported misusing opioids during pregnancy, which can lead to many physiological and neurodevelopmental complications in infants. To combat illicit opioid use during pregnancy, buprenorphine is the priority treatment option, as it reduces illicit opioid use and alleviates symptoms of neonatal abstinence syndrome in infants. However, less is known about the long-term neurophysiological consequences of in utero opioid or buprenorphine exposure. Here, we demonstrate that both oxycodone and buprenorphine exposure, in utero, can result in aberrant dopamine system function in adult rats. These results provide evidence of potential long-lasting effects of opioid exposure during development.

Morphine versus methadone for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome: a randomized controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND

Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome (NOWS) is a significant public health issue and while millions of neonates are affected each year, an optimal pharmacologic weaning protocol has yet to be demonstrated. In this study, we compare hospital length of stay (LOS) and length of treatment (LOT) for treatment of neonatal opioid withdrawal (NOWS) with morphine versus methadone.

METHODS

This was a single-site, open-label, randomized controlled pilot study conducted from October 2016-September 2018. Infants were eligible if their primary in-utero drug exposure was heroin, oral opioids, or methadone and they were born at greater than or equal to 34 weeks gestation. Infants were excluded for serious medical comorbidities and primary in-utero exposure to buprenorphine.

RESULTS

Sixty-one infants were enrolled; 30 were randomized to methadone treatment, and 31 to morphine treatment. Overall 46% of infants required treatment for NOWS. LOS and LOT for infants treated with morphine was 17.9 days and 14.7 days respectively, compared to 16.1 days and 12.8 days for babies treated with methadone (p = 0.5, p = 0.54). Infants treated with morphine received lower total morphine equivalents than those treated with methadone (9.7 vs. 33, p < 0.01). Three treated infants in the methadone group required transfer to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, versus no infants in the morphine group.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants treated with morphine versus methadone had no significant differences in LOS or LOT in this pilot study. Infants treated with methadone received up to 3 times the opioid based on morphine equivalents as infants treated with morphine and had more transfers to the NICU for over sedation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Morphine Versus Methadone for Opiate Exposed Infants With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome NCT02851303 , initiated 01/08/2016.

Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome: a review of the science and a look toward the use of buprenorphine for affected infants

Neonates born to mothers taking opioids during pregnancy are at risk for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), for which there is no recognized standard approach to care. Nonpharmacologic treatment is typically used as a first-line approach for management, and pharmacologic treatment is added when clinical signs are not responding to nonpharmacologic measures alone. Although morphine and methadone are the most commonly used pharmacotherapies for NOWS, buprenorphine has emerged as a treatment option based on its pharmacologic profile and results from initial single site clinical trials. The objective of this report is to provide an overview of NOWS including a summary of ongoing work in the field and to review the state of the science, knowledge gaps, and practical considerations specific to the use of buprenorphine for the treatment of NOWS as discussed by a panel of experts during a virtual workshop hosted by the National Institutes of Health.

Opioid treatment for opioid withdrawal in newborn infants

BACKGROUND

Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) due to opioid withdrawal may result in disruption of the mother-infant relationship, sleep-wake abnormalities, feeding difficulties, weight loss, seizures and neurodevelopmental problems.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of using an opioid for treatment of NAS due to withdrawal from opioids in newborn infants.

SEARCH METHODS

We ran an updated search on 17 September 2020 in CENTRAL via Cochrane Register of Studies Web and MEDLINE via Ovid. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings and the reference lists of retrieved articles for eligible trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi- and cluster-RCTs which enrolled infants born to mothers with opioid dependence and who were experiencing NAS requiring treatment with an opioid.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias, and independently extracted data. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 trials (1110 infants) with NAS secondary to maternal opioid use in pregnancy. Seven studies at low risk of bias were included in sensitivity analysis. Opioid versus no treatment / usual care: a single trial (80 infants) of morphine and supportive care versus supportive care alone reported no difference in treatment failure (risk ratio (RR) 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41 to 4.07; very low certainty evidence). No infant had a seizure. The trial did not report mortality, neurodevelopmental disability and adverse events. Morphine increased days hospitalisation (mean difference (MD) 15.00, 95% CI 8.86 to 21.14; very low certainty evidence) and treatment (MD 12.50, 95% CI 7.52 to 17.48; very low certainty evidence), but decreased days to regain birthweight (MD -2.80, 95% CI -5.33 to -0.27) and duration (minutes) of supportive care each day (MD -197.20, 95% CI -274.15 to -120.25). Morphine versus methadone: there was no difference in treatment failure (RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.67; 2 studies, 147 infants; low certainty evidence). Seizures, neonatal or infant mortality and neurodevelopmental disability were not reported. A single study reported no difference in days hospitalisation (MD 1.40, 95% CI -3.08 to 5.88; 116 infants; low certainty evidence), whereas data from two studies found an increase in days treatment (MD 2.71, 95% CI 0.22 to 5.21; 147 infants; low certainty) for infants treated with morphine. A single study reported no difference in breastfeeding, adverse events, or out of home placement. Morphine versus sublingual buprenorphine: there was no difference in treatment failure (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.74; 3 studies, 113 infants; very low certainty evidence). Neonatal or infant mortality and neurodevelopmental disability were not reported. There was moderate certainty evidence of an increase in days hospitalisation (MD 11.45, 95% CI 5.89 to 17.01; 3 studies, 113 infants), and days treatment (MD 12.79, 95% CI 7.57 to 18.00; 3 studies, 112 infants) for infants treated with morphine. A single adverse event (seizure) was reported in infants exposed to buprenorphine. Morphine versus diluted tincture of opium (DTO): a single study (33 infants) reported no difference in days hospitalisation, days treatment or weight gain (low certainty evidence). Opioid versus clonidine: a single study (31 infants) reported no infant with treatment failure in either group. This study did not report seizures, neonatal or infant mortality and neurodevelopmental disability. There was low certainty evidence for no difference in days hospitalisation or days treatment. This study did not report adverse events. Opioid versus diazepam: there was a reduction in treatment failure from use of an opioid (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.80; 2 studies, 86 infants; low certainty evidence). Seizures, neonatal or infant mortality and neurodevelopmental disability were not reported. A single study of 34 infants comparing methadone versus diazepam reported no difference in days hospitalisation or days treatment (very low certainty evidence). Adverse events were not reported. Opioid versus phenobarbital: there was a reduction in treatment failure from use of an opioid (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.74; 6 studies, 458 infants; moderate certainty evidence). Subgroup analysis found a reduction in treatment failure in trials titrating morphine to ≧ 0.5 mg/kg/day (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.45; 3 studies, 230 infants), whereas a single study using morphine < 0.5 mg/kg/day reported no difference compared to use of phenobarbital (subgroup difference P = 0.05). Neonatal or infant mortality and neurodevelopmental disability were not reported. A single study (111 infants) of paregoric versus phenobarbital reported seven infants with seizures in the phenobarbital group, whereas no seizures were reported in two studies (170 infants) comparing morphine to phenobarbital. There was no difference in days hospitalisation or days treatment. A single study (96 infants) reported no adverse events in either group. Opioid versus chlorpromazine: there was a reduction in treatment failure from use of morphine versus chlorpromazine (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.62; 1 study, 90 infants; moderate certainty evidence). No seizures were reported in either group. There was low certainty evidence for no difference in days treatment. This trial reported no adverse events in either group. None of the included studies reported time to control of NAS. Data for duration and severity of NAS were limited, and we were unable to use these data in quantitative synthesis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to supportive care alone, the addition of an opioid may increase duration of hospitalisation and treatment, but may reduce days to regain birthweight and the duration of supportive care each day. Use of an opioid may reduce treatment failure compared to phenobarbital, diazepam or chlorpromazine. Use of an opioid may have little or no effect on duration of hospitalisation or treatment compared to use of phenobarbital, diazepam or chlorpromazine. The type of opioid used may have little or no effect on the treatment failure rate. Use of buprenorphine probably reduces duration of hospitalisation and treatment compared to morphine, but there are no data for time to control NAS with buprenorphine, and insufficient evidence to determine safety. There is insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness and safety of clonidine.

Using buprenorphine to treat neonatal abstinence syndrome: a quality improvement study

OBJECTIVE

To assess if treating neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) with sublingual buprenorphine (SLB) would decrease the mean duration of therapy (DOT) and length of birth hospital stay (LOS).

STUDY DESIGN

Conducted at a tertiary hospital with >6000 annual deliveries and a 2% incidence of NAS, a quality improvement study using plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were utilized. Outcomes were measured using statistical process control (SPC) charts.

RESULTS

All NAS patients were treated with SLB, no adverse reactions were reported and the need for an adjunctive agent was static. SPC charts demonstrated decreased variability and special cause variation indicating a reduction in both DOT (from 14.5 to 8.5 days) and LOS (from 18.5 to 13 days).

Clinical care of neonates undergoing opioid withdrawal in the immediate postpartum period

As the opioid epidemic escalates in westernized countries around the world, chronic opioid use during pregnancy has become a growing public health issue. There are increasing concerns that chronic maternal opioid use might adversely affect the developing fetal brain. Furthermore, the sudden discontinuation of the trans-placental opioid supply at birth puts newborns at acute risk for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). NOWS is a multi-system disorder that has been identified in approximately 50-80% of neonates exposed to opioids due to chronic maternal use. Clinically, NOWS affects the central and autonomic nervous systems as well as the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts. The clinical features of NOWS include hyperirritability, high-pitched crying, restlessness, tremors, poor sleep, agitation, seizures, sweating, fever, poor feeding, regurgitation, diarrhea, and tachypnea. NOWS is currently diagnosed using a clinical scoring tool followed by toxicological confirmation of the presence of opioids in meconium or tissue specimens. The first-line treatments for NOWS are non-pharmacologic comfort measures. If these measures fail, neonates may be treated with opioids and/or sedatives. Since the severity of NOWS can be highly variable, it is quite difficult to predict which opioid-exposed neonates will require pharmacotherapy and prolonged hospitalization. Factors associated with maternal polysubstance use, including the use of illicit substances and tobacco, have been associated with the increased severity and duration of NOWS. Since neonates with NOWS are at increased risk for long-term adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, ongoing monitoring beyond the neonatal period is essential.

Choosing wisely for the other 80%: What we need to know about the more mature newborn and NICU care

Although neonatal intensive unit (NICU) care is envisioned as the care of very immature infants, more than 95% of births and 80% of NICU admissions are of more mature newborns-infants born at 34 or more weeks' gestation. In spite of the size of this population there are important gaps in the understanding of their needs and optimal management as reflected by remarkably large unexplained variation in their care. The goal of this article is to describe what is known about the more mature, higher birth weight newborn population's use of NICU care and highlight important gaps in knowledge and obstacles to research. Research priorities are identified: including (1) the need for birth population based rather than NICU based studies, and (2) population specific data elements. Summary: More mature newborns-infants of 34 or more weeks' gestation-account for most NICU admissions. There are large gaps in the understanding of their needs and optimal management as reflected by large unexplained variation in their care. We enumerate these gaps in current knowledge and suggest research priorities to address them.

Opioid use during pregnancy can impair maternal behavior and the Maternal Brain Network: A literature review

Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is a global epidemic also affecting women of reproductive age. A standard form of pharmacological treatment for OUD is Opioid Maintenance Therapy (OMT) and buprenorphine has emerged as the preferred treatment for pregnant women with OUD relative to methadone. However, the consequences of BUP exposure on the developing Maternal Brain Network and mother-infant dyad are not well understood. The maternal-infant bond is dependent on the Maternal Brain Network, which is responsible for the dynamic transition from a "nulliparous brain" to a "maternal brain". The Maternal Brain Network consists of regions implicated in maternal care (e.g., medial preoptic area, nucleus accumbens, ventral pallidum, ventral tegmentum area) and maternal defense (e.g., periaqueductal gray). The endogenous opioid system modulates many of the neurochemical changes in these areas during the transition to motherhood. Thus, it is not surprising that exogenous opioid exposure during pregnancy can be disruptive to the Maternal Brain Network. Though less drastic than misused opioids, OMTs may not be without risk of disrupting the neural and molecular structures of the Maternal Brain Network. This review describes the Maternal Brain Network as a framework for understanding how pharmacological differences in exogenous opioid exposure can disrupt the onset and maintenance of the maternal brain and summarizes opioid and OMT (in particular buprenorphine) use in the context of pregnancy and maternal behavior. This review also highlights future directions for evaluating exogenous opioid effects on the Maternal Brain Network in the hopes of raising awareness for the impact of the opioid crisis not only on exposed infants, but also on mothers and subsequent mother-infant bonds.

Clinical pharmacology and dosing regimen optimization of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome treatments

In this paper, we review the management of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) and clinical pharmacology of primary treatment agents in NOWS, including morphine, methadone, buprenorphine, clonidine, and phenobarbital. Pharmacologic treatment strategies in NOWS have been mostly empirical, and heterogeneity in dosing regimens adds to the difficulty of extrapolating study results to broader patient populations. As population pharmacokinetics (PKs) of pharmacologic agents in NOWS become more well‐defined and knowledge of patient‐specific factors affecting treatment outcomes continue to accumulate, PK/pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation will be powerful tools to aid the design of optimal dosing regimens at the patient level. Although there is an increasing number of clinical trials on the comparative efficacy of treatment agents in NOWS, here, we also draw attention to the importance of optimizing the dosing regimen, which can be arguably equally important at identifying the optimal treatment agent.

Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome (NOWS): A Transgenerational Echo of the Opioid Crisis

The incidence of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) has increased substantially in the setting of the opioid epidemic, a major public health problem in the United States. At present, NOWS has commonly used assessment and treatment protocols, but new protocols have questioned old practices. However, because of limited access to opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment and socioeconomic factors, many pregnant (and postpartum) women with OUD do not receive treatment. The pathophysiology of NOWS is not completely understood, although limited research studies have been conducted in humans and animals to better understand its etiology. Moreover, there is evidence that epigenetic and genetic factors play a role in the development of NOWS, but further study is needed. Animal models have suggested that there are deleterious effects of in utero opioid exposure later in life. Clinical research has revealed the harmful long-term sequelae of NOWS, with respect to cognitive function and childhood development. Many psychiatric disorders begin during adolescence, so as infants born with NOWS approach adolescence, additional clinical and molecular studies are warranted to identify biologic and psychosocial risk factors and long-term effects of NOWS. Additionally, access to specialized OUD treatment for pregnant women must be more readily available in the United States, especially in rural areas.

Opioid Treatment for Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome: Current Challenges and Future Approaches

Chronic intrauterine exposure to psychoactive drugs often results in neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). When nonpharmacologic measures are insufficient in controlling NOWS, morphine, methadone, and buprenorphine are first-line medications commonly used to treat infants with NOWS because of in utero exposure to opioids. Research suggests that buprenorphine may be the leading drug therapy used to treat NOWS when compared with morphine and methadone. Currently, there are no consensus or standardized treatment guidelines for medications prescribed for NOWS. Opioids used to treat NOWS exhibit large interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) response in neonates. Organ systems undergo rapid maturation after birth that may alter drug disposition and exposure for any given dose during development. Data regarding the PK and PD of opioids in neonates are sparse. Pharmacometric methods such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic and population pharmacokinetic modeling can be used to explore factors predictive of some of the variability associated with the PK/PD of opioids in newborns. This review discusses the utility of pharmacometric techniques for enhancing precision dosing in infants requiring opioid treatment for NOWS. Applying these approaches may contribute to optimizing the outcome by reducing cumulative drug exposure, mitigating adverse drug effects, and reducing the burden of NOWS in neonates.

Eat, Sleep, Console and Adjunctive Buprenorphine Improved Outcomes in Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome

BACKGROUND

The worsening opioid crisis has increased the number of infants exposed to maternal opioids. Standard treatment of newborns exposed to opioids prenatally often requires prolonged hospitalization and separation of the mother-infant dyad. These practices can potentially increase severity of withdrawal symptoms, interrupt breastfeeding, and disturb mother-infant bonding. Use of the Eat, Sleep, Console (ESC) model may ameliorate symptoms, decrease mother-infant separation, and decrease hospital length of stay.

PURPOSE

To manage opioid exposed infants in a more holistic manner to decrease neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, reduce the need for pharmacotherapy, and evaluate response and total length of treatment after a unit protocol change from morphine to buprenorphine.

METHODS

Implemented ESC model, optimized nonpharmacologic bundle, and prescribed buprenorphine therapy instead of morphine as needed for adjunctive therapy.

RESULTS

Admissions of opioid-exposed infants from the Mother-Baby Unit (MBU) to the NICU decreased by 22%, and the number of infants who required pharmacotherapy was reduced by 50%. The average length of pharmacotherapy fell from 14 to 6.5 days.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The successful implementation of the ESC model helped keep the mother-infant dyad together, reduced admissions to the NICU, and lessened the need for pharmacotherapy. The change to buprenorphine further reduced our average length of treatment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Investigation of monotherapy with buprenorphine needs to be evaluated as a valid treatment option. The buprenorphine dosing and weaning chart will need to be revised and modified if indicated.

Outcome reporting in neonates experiencing withdrawal following opioid exposure in pregnancy: a systematic review

Background

Neonatal withdrawal secondary to in utero opioid exposure is a growing global concern stressing the psychosocial well-being of affected families and scarce hospital resources. In the ongoing search for the most effective treatment, randomized controlled trials are indispensable. Consistent outcome selection and measurement across randomized controlled trials enables synthesis of results, fostering the translation of research into practice. Currently, there is no core outcome set to standardize outcome selection, definition and reporting. This study identifies the outcomes currently reported in the literature for neonates experiencing withdrawal following opioid exposure during pregnancy.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central was conducted to identify all primary research studies (randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, case-controlled studies, uncontrolled trials, observational cohort studies, clinical practice guidelines and case reports) reporting outcomes for interventions used to manage neonatal abstinence syndrome between July 2007 and July 2017. All “primary” and “secondary” neonatal outcomes were extracted by two independent reviewers and were assigned to one of OMERACT’s core areas of “pathophysiological manifestation”, “life impact”, “resource use”, “adverse events”, or “death”.

Results

Forty-seven primary research articles reporting 107 “primary” and 127 “secondary” outcomes were included. The most frequently reported outcomes were “duration of pharmacotherapy” (68% of studies, N = 32), “duration of hospital stay” (66% of studies, N = 31) and “withdrawal symptoms” (51% of studies, N = 24). The discrepancy between the number of times an outcome was reported and the number of articles was secondary to the use of composite outcomes. Frequently reported outcomes had heterogeneous definitions or were not defined by the study and were measured at different times. Outcomes reported in the literature to date were mainly assigned to the core areas “pathophysiologic manifestations” or “resource use”. No articles reported included parent or former patient involvement in outcome selections.

Conclusions

Inconsistent selection and definition of primary and secondary outcomes exists in the present literature of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions for managing opioid withdrawal in neonates. No studies involved parents in the process of outcome selection. These findings hinder evidence synthesis to generate clinically meaningful practice guidelines. The development of a specific core outcome set is imperative.

Emerging therapies for the treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome

Objective: To examine the evidence for emerging treatment options, buprenorphine or clonidine, as monotherapy for the treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) against standards of care, morphine or methadone.Data sources: A PubMed literature search from 1946 to 2019 was performed using the terms NAS, neonatal withdrawal, buprenorphine and NAS, clonidine and NAS, morphine and NAS, methadone and NAS, opioids and pregnancy, opioids and NAS, prenatal exposure and opioids.Study selection and data extraction: Study evaluation was limited to English-language studies conducted in humans. Articles were eliminated if subjects did not have a formal diagnosis of NAS. Additionally, studies were eliminated if neonates received diluted tincture of opium. Additional references were identified from a manual citation review.Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: Eight articles were evaluated. Five articles compared buprenorphine to either morphine or methadone. Buprenorphine was found to decrease length of NAS treatment an average of 9.2 days and decrease hospital length of stay (LOS) an average of 8.2 days. Three articles evaluated the use of clonidine for NAS, two as an adjunct to morphine and one as monotherapy. Adjunctive clonidine plus morphine versus phenobarbital plus morphine both significantly reduced the total morphine treatment duration; however, patients remained on adjunctive phenobarbital significantly longer than clonidine. As monotherapy, clonidine was found to decrease NAS treatment an average of 11 days and decrease overall LOS an average of six days compared to morphine treatment.Conclusion: Treatment with buprenorphine or clonidine has shown favorable effects by reducing length of NAS treatment and LOS. These emerging therapies may be as effective as morphine or methadone for NAS, in combination with nonpharmacologic strategies. Long-term follow-up is needed.

Well-Child Care Adherence After Intrauterine Opioid Exposure

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

For children with intrauterine opioid exposure (IOE), well-child care (WCC) provides an important opportunity to address medical, developmental, and psychosocial needs. We evaluated WCC adherence for this population.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we used PEDSnet data from a pediatric primary care network spanning 3 states from 2011 to 2016. IOE was ascertained by using physician diagnosis codes. WCC adherence in the first year was defined as a postnatal or 1-month visit and completed 2-, 4-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month visits. WCC adherence in the second year was defined as completed 15- and 18-month visits. Gaps in WCC, defined as ≥2 missed consecutive WCC visits, were also evaluated. We used multivariable regression to test the independent effect of IOE status.

RESULTS

Among 11 334 children, 236 (2.1%) had a diagnosis of IOE. Children with IOE had a median of 6 WCC visits (interquartile range 5-7), vs 8 (interquartile range 6-8) among children who were not exposed (P < .001). IOE was associated with decreased WCC adherence over the first and second years of life (adjusted relative risk 0.54 [P < .001] and 0.74 [P < .001]). WCC gaps were more likely in this population (adjusted relative risk 1.43; P < .001). There were no significant adjusted differences in nonroutine primary care visits, immunizations by age 2, or lead screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Children <2 years of age with IOE are less likely to adhere to recommended WCC, despite receiving on-time immunizations and lead screening. Further research should be focused on the role of WCC visits to support the complex needs of this population.

Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Review of Epidemiology, Care Models, and Current Understanding of Outcomes

The incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome owing to prenatal opioid exposure has grown rapidly in recent decades and it disproportionately affects rural, non-white, and public insurance-dependent populations. Treatment consists of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions with wide variability in approaches across the United States. Standardizing clinical assessment, minimizing unnecessary interruptions, and prioritizing nonpharmacologic and family-centered care seems to improve hospital outcomes. Neonatal abstinence syndrome may have long-term developmental and biological effects, but understanding is limited owing in part confounding biosocial factors. Early intervention and longitudinal support of the infant and family promote better outcomes.

Pharmacologic Management of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Using a Protocol

BACKGROUND

The opioid epidemic in the United States has reached unprecedented proportions with far-reaching impacts on the most vulnerable population. The number of neonates born addicted to opioids has grown exponentially over the last several decades, leading to increased neonatal intensive care unit admissions and rising healthcare costs. Recent studies have yielded mixed results regarding which medication is most effective at relieving the symptoms of opioid withdrawal and reducing the weaning timeframe for babies with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS).

PURPOSE

To explore and compare the effectiveness of morphine versus methadone in the treatment for NAS using a standardized protocol.

METHOD

A literature search of PubMed and CINAHL was performed. The search yielded 10 quantitative studies that were analyzed for potential practice changes.

CONCLUSION

Based on current literature, following a standardized, stringent weaning protocol is more beneficial than the pharmacologic agent used. Studies reveal shorter weaning times and hospital stays in almost every group that followed rigid guidelines.

IMPLICATION FOR RESEARCH

Although current studies are promising for the desired outcome, more research is needed to develop appropriate protocol-based weaning regimens for management of NAS.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

As the occurrence of NAS continues to rise, its management must vigorously meet the challenges of the diagnosis. Institutions should reevaluate their current protocols based on reassuring data showing that stringent guidelines using morphine or methadone can improve clinical outcomes, reduce hospital length, and lower healthcare costs.

Research and policy priorities for addressing prenatal exposure to opioids in Alaska

The current opioid crisis in Alaska and the USA will negatively affect the health and wellbeing of future generations. The increasing number of infants born with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) has had a profound impact on families, health care providers and the child welfare system. This manuscript summarises the main themes of a Symposium held in Anchorage, Alaska with health care providers, researchers, elders and public health officials that focused on identifying emerging challenges, trends and potential solutions to address the increasing number of infants and children affected by maternal opioid use. Five areas of importance for research and policy development that would direct improvement in the care of infants with NOWS in Alaska are outlined with the goal of supporting a research agenda on opioid misuse and child health across the circumpolar north. Abbreviations: NOWS - neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome; NAS - neonatal abstinence syndrome; MAT - medication-assisted treatment; NICU - neonatal intensive care unit; OATs - opioid agonist treatments; OCS - office of children's services; ANTHC - Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium; OUD - opioid use disorder; SBIRT - screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment; ISPCTN - IDeA States Pediatric Clinical Trials Network; NIH - National Institutes of Health; ANMC - Alaska Native Medical Center; DHSS - Department of Health and Social Services; AAPP - All Alaska Pediatric Partnership.

Comparative effectiveness of opioid replacement agents for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE(S)

To compare short-term treatment outcomes of opioid pharmacotherapy for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS).

STUDY DESIGN

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and The Cochrane Library were searched from inception through September 30, 2018. Primary outcome was treatment duration (LOT). Secondary outcomes included hospitalization duration (LOS) and rate of adjunct drug needed (RAD).

RESULTS

Of 753 publications, 11 studies met inclusion criteria. There was no difference in LOT (WMD -1.39 [-5.79 to -3.01] days, I² 82%) or LOS (WMD -1.48 [-5.75 to -2.79] days, I² 92%) between morphine and methadone. RAD with morphine was higher (RR 1.51 [1.35-1.69], I² 0%). Buprenorphine was associated with shorter LOT (WMD 7.70 [0.88-14.53] days, I² 76%) and LOS (WMD 5.61 [-0.01 to -11.24] days, I² 60%) compared with morphine, in addition to methadone according to two cohort studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Methadone had superior primary treatment success compared with morphine. Buprenorphine was associated with the shortest overall durations of treatment and hospitalization.

Early postpartum resting-state functional connectivity for mothers receiving buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder: A pilot study

Between 1999 and 2014, the prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) among pregnant women quadrupled in the USA. The standard treatment for peripartum women with OUD is buprenorphine. However, the maternal behavior neurocircuit that regulates maternal behavior and mother-infant bonding has not been previously studied for human mothers receiving buprenorphine treatment for OUD (BT). Rodent research shows opioid effects on reciprocal inhibition between maternal care and defence maternal brain subsystems: the hypothalamus and periaqueductal gray, respectively. We conducted a longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) pilot study in humans to specifically examine resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) between the periaqueductal gray and hypothalamus, as well as to explore associations with maternal bonding for BT. We studied 32 mothers who completed fMRI scans at 1 month (T1) and 4 months postpartum (T2), including seven mothers receiving buprenorphine for OUD and 25 non-OUD mothers as a comparison group (CG). The participants underwent a 6-minute resting-state fMRI scan at each time point. We measured potential bonding impairments using the Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire to explore how rs-FC with periaqueductal gray is associated with bonding impairments. Compared to CG, BT mothers differed in periaqueductal gray-dependent rs-FC with the hypothalamus, amygdala, insular cortex and other brain regions at T1, with many of these differences disappearing at T2, suggesting potential therapeutic effects of continuing buprenorphine treatment. In contrast, the "rejection and pathological anger" subscale of the Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire at T1 and T2 was associated with the T1-to-T2 increases in periaqueductal gray-dependent rs-FC with the hypothalamus and amygdala. Preliminary evidence links maternal bonding problems for mothers with OUD early in the postpartum to connectivity between specific care and defence maternal brain circuits, which may be mitigated by buprenorphine treatment. This exploratory study supports a potential mechanism for investigating both the therapeutic benefits and risks of opioids for maternal care and bonding with infants.

Interventions for the Treatment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome

The growing incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) among newborns is a public health crisis that is a sequela of the national opioid crisis. When fetuses are exposed to opioids in utero, whether through prescription pain medication, illicit substances, or supervised medication-assisted opioid treatment, neonates can experience withdrawal symptoms shortly after birth. Opioid withdrawal manifests with symptoms of central nervous system and autonomic nervous system dysfunction. Treatment of NAS begins with nonpharmacologic interventions, and if a neonate requires more intensive treatment, care will escalate to include pharmacologic treatments, including morphine, methadone, and buprenorphine. When pharmacologic therapy begins, nonpharmacologic intervention is not ceased; rather, the two are used in conjunction in an attempt to reduce the amount of medication required for successful treatment. Herein we review nonpharmacologic nursing interventions, discuss the most common pharmacologic treatments for NAS, and present practice implications for nurses who work with childbearing families.

Effects of opioids on the parental brain in health and disease

The epidemic of opioid use disorder (OUD) directly affects millions of women of child-bearing age. Unfortunately, parenting behaviors - among the most important processes for human survival - are vulnerable to the effects of OUD. The standard of care for pregnant women with OUD is opioid maintenance therapy (OMT), of which the primary objective is to mitigate addiction-related stress. The aim of this review is to synthesize current information specific to pregnancy and parenting that may be affected by OUD. We first summarize a model of the parental brain supported by animal research and human neuroimaging. We then review animal models of exogenous opioid effects on parental brain and behavior. We also present preliminary data for a unifying hypothesis that may link different effects of exogenous opioids on parenting across species and in the context of OMT. Finally, we discuss future directions that may inform research and clinical decision making for peripartum women with OUD.

Analgesia, Opioids, and Other Drug Use During Pregnancy and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome

When opioid misuse rises in the United States, pregnant women and their neonates are affected. This article summarizes the use of Food and Drug Administration-approved products, including methadone, buprenorphine, and the combination formulation of buprenorphine and naloxone to treat adult opioid use disorder during the perinatal period. All labels include pregnancy, neonatal, and lactation information and note the accepted use of these medications during the perinatal period if the benefits outweigh the risks. A summary of the neonatal abstinence syndrome definition, its assessment tools, treatment approaches, and future genetic directions are provided.

Models of care for neonatal abstinence syndrome: What works?

Opioid use disorders and the prescription of long-acting medications for their treatment have increased dramatically over the last decade among pregnant women. Newborns who experience prolonged in utero opioid exposure may develop neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). Until recently, much of the focus on improving care for NAS has been on pharmacologically-based care models. Recent studies have illustrated the benefits of rooming-in and parental presence on NAS outcomes. Single center Quality Improvement (QI) initiatives demonstrate the benefits of non-pharmacologic care bundles and symptom prioritization in decreasing the proportion of infants pharmacologically treated and length of hospital stay. Little remains known about the impact of these varied cared models on maternal-infant attachment and mental health. In this review article, we will propose an optimal model of care to improve short- and long-term outcomes for newborns, their mothers and families, and perinatal care systems.

Neonatal abstinence syndrome

Neonates exposed prenatally to opioids will often develop a collection of withdrawal signs known as neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). The incidence of NAS has substantially increased in recent years placing an increasing burden on the healthcare system. Traditional approaches to assessment and management have relied on symptom-based scoring tools and utilization of slowly decreasing doses of medication, though newer models of care focused on non-pharmacologic interventions and rooming-in have demonstrated promise in reducing length of hospital stay and medication usage. Data on long-term outcomes for both traditional and newer approaches to care of infants with NAS is limited and an important area of future research. This review will examine the history, incidence and pathophysiology of NAS. We will also review diagnostic screening approaches, scoring tools, differing management approaches and conclude with recommendations for continued work to improve the care of infants with NAS.

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for the Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS)

Neonatal abstinence syndrome is defined by signs and symptoms of withdrawal that infants develop after intrauterine maternal drug exposure. All infants with documented in utero opioid exposure, or a high pre-test probability of exposure should have monitoring with a standard assessment instrument such as a Finnegan Score. A Finnegan score of >8 is suggestive of opioid exposure, even in the absence of declared use during pregnancy. At least half of infants in most locales can be treated without the use of pharmacologic means. For this reason, symptom scores will drive the decision for pharmacologic therapy. Nevertheless, all infants, regardless of initial manifestations, should be first be managed with non-pharmacologic approaches which in turn, should not be considered as the sole alternative to drug therapy, but rather, as the base upon which all patients are treated. Those who continue to have symptoms despite supportive care should be pharmacologically treated, which in the most severe cases, is life-saving.

Opioid Use in Pregnant Women and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome-A Review of the Literature

Opiate use during pregnancy has been an increasing problem over the last two decades, making it an important social and health concern. The use of such substances may have serious negative outcomes in the newborn, and clinical and cognitive conditions have been reported, including neonatal abstinence syndrome, developmental problems, and lower cognitive performance. These conditions are common when opiates are used during pregnancy, making the prescription of these kinds of drugs problematic. Moreover, the mother may develop opiate addiction, thus, increasing the likelihood of the infant being born with any of those conditions. This paper reviews the use of opiates during pregnancy and focuses mainly on the neonatal abstinence syndrome. First, the commonly prescribed opiates will be identified, namely those usually involved in cases of addiction and/or neonatal abstinence syndrome. Second, published approaches to deal with those problems will be presented and discussed, including the treatment of both the mother and the infant. Finally, we will outline the treatments that are safest and most efficient, and will define future goals, approaches, and research directions for the scientific community regarding this problem.

Developmental Disorders and Medical Complications Among Infants with Subclinical Intrauterine Opioid Exposures

The objective was to compare diagnosis rates representing developmental outcomes and medical complications between infants with intrauterine opioid exposures who did not receive pharmacologic treatment for neonatal abstinence syndrome at the time of birth and infants for whom no exposure to substances of abuse were detected. This retrospective, descriptive study included approximately 95% of Hamilton County, Ohio resident births in 2014 and 2015. Universal maternal drug test results, performed at the time of birth, were documented and linked to electronic health records representing pediatric primary and subspecialty follow-up care as well as urgent care, emergency care, and inpatient services provided by Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center through 2017, when all children were at least 24 months old. Diagnosis rates were compared between drug exposure groups using chi-square tests. Among infants born at >34 weeks gestation and without other complex clinical conditions, infants with subclinical opioid exposures (N = 473) were more likely than infants with no drug exposures (N = 14,933) to be diagnosed with behavioral or emotional disorders (3.0% vs 1.1%, P = 0.0008), developmental delay (15.6% vs 7.6%, P < 0.0001), speech disorder (10.1% vs 6.5%, P = 0.001), or strabismus (3.4% vs 1.0%, P < 0.0001), and more likely to be exposed to the hepatitis C virus (6.8% vs 0.1%, P < 0.0001). Increased diagnosis rates among all opioid exposed infants, regardless of withdrawal severity, may warrant the additional allocation of resources for screening and follow-up. Awareness of the increased risk for certain developmental delays and medical conditions is critical to early intervention and treatment supporting improved outcomes.

Early life opioid exposure and potential long-term effects

The long-term consequences of perinatal opioid exposure and subsequent development of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome is largely unknown and likely dependent on a multitude of factors, including co-morbid drug use, pre- and post-natal care, and individual factors including the maternal-infant relationship and home environment. This review summarizes the current literature from clinical and preclinical studies on perinatal opioid exposure, focusing on the consequences in the offspring. Although a large number of preclinical studies have been conducted examining the impact of prenatal opioid exposure, the models employed are not necessarily representative of clinical use patterns, making it challenging to translate these results to the impacted population. Use of more clinically-relevant models of perinatal opioid exposure are requisite for the development of improved pharmacological and behavioral treatment strategies to improve quality of life for this vulnerable population.

Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome

Objective: To summarize the available data for using buprenorphine in neonatal abstinence syndrome and discuss these data in context of the current standard of care therapies, oral morphine and oral methadone. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted using PubMed (1949-May 2018) and EMBASE (1980-May 2018). Combinations of the search terms “buprenorphine,” “neonatal,” and “neonatal abstinence syndrome” were used. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All full-length, English-language studies were included in this review. Data Synthesis: A total of 4 studies were included in this review including 1 retrospective cohort study, 2 prospective single-center open-label randomized trials, and 1 prospective single-center, double-blind study. Oral morphine was the comparator in 3 studies, and oral methadone was the comparator in one. Buprenorphine was associated with a significant reduction in duration of treatment in 3 of the 4 studies and was associated with a significant reduction in duration of hospital stay in 3 of the 4 studies. In the randomized, double-blinded trial, buprenorphine had a significantly reduced duration of treatment (15 vs 28 days, P < .001) and duration of hospital stay (21 vs 33 days, P < .001). The requirement of adjunct treatment was similar between groups in all 4 studies, and buprenorphine did not have any significant adverse reactions in comparison with morphine and methadone. Conclusions: Buprenorphine appears to be a safe option for treating neonatal abstinence syndrome that is potentially superior to the current standard of care therapies with respect to duration of treatment and hospital length of stay.

Retrospective review of neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants treated for neonatal abstinence syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about developmental outcomes in neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). We hypothesized that children treated for NAS would score lower than the normative sample on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 3rd edition.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 87 infants treated for NAS and evaluated at 2 years of age.

RESULTS

Children treated for NAS scored significantly lower than the norm (mean 100) on all 3 subscales (cognitive mean 96.5, language mean 93.8, motor mean 94.0, all p < 0.03). Children who lived with foster/adoptive families at follow up had higher cognitive scores (median 100 vs. 95, p = 0.03) than those who lived with biological relatives, and were less likely to have motor scores <85 (p = 0.02). Eight percent of children required treatment for strabismus.

CONCLUSIONS

Children treated for NAS are at risk for lower developmental scores and higher rates of strabismus at age 2 than the general population.

The Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Buprenorphine in Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome

Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a condition affecting newborns that are exposed to an opioid in utero. In a randomized, controlled trial assessing the efficacy of buprenorphine and morphine in NAS, blood samples were analyzed from a subset of patients receiving buprenorphine along with NAS scores. The data were used to validate and adapt an existing model of buprenorphine in neonates and to identify relationships between buprenorphine or norbuprenorphine pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy or safety. The time to NAS stabilization was found to decrease with increasing buprenorphine exposure. This pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationship was able to be quantified and adequately described with a mathematical model. The findings confirm a previous PK model of buprenorphine and extend the model to describe the PK of norbuprenorphine and to identify a novel PK-PD relationship of buprenorphine in NAS. This model will allow optimization of dosing strategies in future clinical trials.

Buprenorphine in Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome

Infants exposed in utero to opioids will demonstrate a withdrawal syndrome known as neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). Buprenorphine is a long-acting opioid with therapeutic use in medication-assisted treatment of opioid dependency in adults and adolescents. Emerging data from clinical trials and treatment cohorts demonstrate the efficacy and safety of sublingual buprenorphine for those infants with NAS who require pharmacologic treatment. Pharmacometric modeling will assist in defining the exposure-response relationships and facilitate dose optimization.