Should Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Be Offered? An International Survey

Race-Conscious Research Using Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Data: A Narrative Review

Race-conscious research identifies health disparities with 1) rigorous and responsible data collection, 2) intentionality and considered analyses, and 3) interpretation of results that advance health equity. Individual registries must overcome specific challenges to promote race-conscious research, and this paper describes ways to achieve this with a focus on the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry. This article reviews ELSO registry publications that studied race with outcomes to consider whether research outputs align with race-conscious concepts and describe the direction of associations reported. Studies were identified via secondary analysis of a comprehensive scoping review on ECMO disparities. Of 32 multicenter publications, two (6%) studied race as the primary objective. Statistical analyses, confounder adjustment, and inclusive, antibiased language were inconsistently used. Only two (6%) papers explicitly discussed mechanistic drivers of inequity such as structural racism, and five (16%) discussed race variable limitations or acknowledged unmeasured confounders. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry publications demonstrated more adverse ECMO outcomes for underrepresented/minoritized populations than non-ELSO studies. With the objective to promote race-conscious ELSO registry research outputs, we provide a comprehensive understanding of race variable limitations, suggest reasoned retrospective analytic approaches, offer ways to interpret results that advance health equity, and recommend practice modifications for data collection.

Admission Functional Status is Associated With Intensivists Perception of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Candidacy for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Failure

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between admission Functional Status Scale (FSS) category and perceived extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) candidacy for pediatric acute respiratory failure.

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Single-center, quaternary, and ECMO referral academic children's hospital between March 2021 and January 2022.

SUBJECTS

Pediatric intensivists directly caring for patients admitted with acute respiratory failure secondary to shock or respiratory disease.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Pediatric intensivists were surveyed about current patients within 72 hours of initiation or escalation of invasive mechanical ventilation on whether they would offer ECMO should their patient deteriorate. Baseline functional status was assessed using trichotomized admission FSS: 1) normal/mild dysfunction (6-9), 2) moderate dysfunction (10-15), and 3) severe dysfunction (> 16). Multivariable logistic regression clustered by physician was used to assess the association between admission FSS category with perceived ECMO candidacy. Thirty-seven intensivists participated with 76% (137/180) of survey responses by those with less than 10 years of experience. 81% of patients (146/180) were perceived as ECMO candidates and 19% of patients (34/180) were noncandidates. Noncandidates had worse admission FSS scores than candidates (15.5 vs. 9, p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, admission FSS category of severe dysfunction had lower odds of perceived ECMO candidacy compared with normal to mild dysfunction (odds ratio [OR] 0.18 [95% CI, 0.06-0.56], p < 0.003). Patients with an abnormal communication subscore domain had the lowest odds of being considered a candidate (unadjusted OR 0.44 [95% CI, 0.29-0.68], p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective, single-center, cross-sectional study, admission FSS category indicating worse baseline functional status impacted pediatric intensivists' perceptions of ECMO candidacy for patients with acute respiratory failure. Abnormal FSS subscores in the neurocognitive domains were the most important considerations. Future studies should better seek to define the decision-making priorities of both parents and medical specialists for the utilization of ECMO in children with acute respiratory failure.

Health Disparities in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Utilization and Outcomes: A Scoping Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature

OBJECTIVES

To map the scope, methodological rigor, quality, and direction of associations between social determinants of health (SDoH) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization or outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for citations from January 2000 to January 2023, examining socioeconomic status (SES), race, ethnicity, hospital and ECMO program characteristics, transport, and geographic location (context) with utilization and outcomes (concept) in ECMO patients (population).

STUDY SELECTION

Methodology followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses scoping review extension. Two reviewers independently evaluated abstracts and full text of identified publications. Exclusion criteria included non-English, unavailable, less than 40 patients, and periprocedural or mixed mechanical support.

DATA EXTRACTION

Content analysis used a standardized data extraction tool and inductive thematic analysis for author-proposed mediators of disparities. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 8,214 citations screened, 219 studies were identified. Primary analysis focuses on 148 (68%) including race/ethnicity/SES/payer variables including investigation of ECMO outcomes 114 (77%) and utilization 43 (29%). SDoH were the primary predictor in 15 (10%). Overall quality and methodologic rigor was poor with advanced statistics in 7%. Direction of associations between ECMO outcomes or utilization according to race, ethnicity, SES, or payer varied. In 38% adverse outcomes or lower use was reported in underrepresented, under-resourced or diverse populations, while improved outcomes or greater use were observed in these populations in 7%, and 55% had no statistically significant result. Only 26 studies (18%) discussed mechanistic drivers of disparities, primarily focusing on individual- and hospital-level rather than systemic/structural factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Associations between ECMO utilization and outcomes with SDoH are inconsistent, complicated by population heterogeneity and analytic shortcomings with limited consideration of systemic contributors. Findings and research gaps have implications for measuring, analyzing, and interpreting SDoH in ECMO research and healthcare.

International survey of neuromonitoring and neurodevelopmental outcome in children and adults supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in Europe

BACKGROUND

Adverse neurological events during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are common and may be associated with devastating consequences. Close monitoring, early identification and prompt intervention can mitigate early and late neurological morbidity. Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive/neurodevelopmental follow-up are critically important to optimize outcomes in both adults and children.

OBJECTIVE

To assess current practice of neuromonitoring during ECMO and neurocognitive/neurodevelopmental follow-up after ECMO across Europe and to inform the development of neuromonitoring and follow-up guidelines.

METHODS

The EuroELSO Neurological Monitoring and Outcome Working Group conducted an electronic, web-based, multi-institutional, multinational survey in Europe.

RESULTS

Of the 211 European ECMO centres (including non-ELSO centres) identified and approached in 23 countries, 133 (63%) responded. Of these, 43% reported routine neuromonitoring during ECMO for all patients, 35% indicated selective use, and 22% practiced bedside clinical examination alone. The reported neuromonitoring modalities were NIRS (n = 88, 66.2%), electroencephalography (n = 52, 39.1%), transcranial Doppler (n = 38, 28.5%) and brain injury biomarkers (n = 33, 24.8%). Paediatric centres (67%) reported using cranial ultrasound, though the frequency of monitoring varied widely. Before hospital discharge following ECMO, 50 (37.6%) reported routine neurological assessment and 22 (16.5%) routinely performed neuroimaging with more paediatric centres offering neurological assessment (65%) as compared to adult centres (20%). Only 15 (11.2%) had a structured longitudinal follow-up pathway (defined followup at regular intervals), while 99 (74.4%) had no follow-up programme. The majority (n = 96, 72.2%) agreed that there should be a longitudinal structured follow-up for ECMO survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey demonstrated significant variability in the use of different neuromonitoring modalities during and after ECMO. The perceived importance of neuromonitoring and follow-up was noted to be very high with agreement for a longitudinal structured follow-up programme, particularly in paediatric patients. Scientific society endorsed guidelines and minimum standards should be developed to inform local protocols.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Outcomes in Children With Preexisting Neurologic Disorders or Neurofunctional Disability

OBJECTIVE

Patient selection for pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support has broadened over the years to include children with pre-existing neurologic morbidities. We aimed to determine the prevalence and nature of pre-ECMO neurologic disorders or disability and investigate the association between pre-ECMO neurologic disorders or disability and mortality and unfavorable neurologic outcome.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Eight hospitals reporting to the Pediatric ECMO Outcomes Registry between October 2011 and June 2019.

PATIENTS

Children younger than 18 years supported with venoarterial or venovenous ECMO.

INTERVENTIONS

The primary exposure was presence of pre-ECMO neurologic disorders or moderate-to-severe disability, defined as Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) or Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) 3-5. The primary outcome was unfavorable outcome at hospital discharge, defined as in-hospital mortality or survival with moderate-to-severe disability (discharge PCPC 3-5 with deterioration from baseline).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 598 children included in the final cohort, 68 of 598 (11%) had a pre-ECMO neurologic disorder, 70 of 595 (12%) had a baseline PCPC 3-5, and 189 of 592 (32%) had a baseline POPC 3-5. The primary outcome of in-hospital mortality ( n = 267) or survival with PCPC 3-5 with deterioration from baseline ( n = 39) was observed in 306 of 598 (51%). Overall, one or more pre-ECMO neurologic disorders or disability were present in 226 of 598 children (38%) but, after adjustment for age, sex, diagnostic category, pre-ECMO cardiac arrest, and ECMO mode, were not independently associated with increased odds of unfavorable outcome (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.07-1.69; multivariable adjusted OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.92-1.82).

CONCLUSIONS

In this exploratory study using a multicenter pediatric ECMO registry, more than one third of children requiring ECMO support had pre-ECMO neurologic disorders or disability. However, pre-existing morbidities were not independently associated with mortality or unfavorable neurologic outcomes at hospital discharge after adjustment for diagnostic category and other covariates.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Candidacy Decisions: An Argument for a Process-Based Longitudinal Approach

Are all children extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) candidates? Navigating ECMO decisions represents an enormous challenge in pediatric critical care. ECMO cannulation should not be a default option as it will not confer benefit for "all" critically ill children; however, "all" children deserve well-considered decisions surrounding their ECMO candidacy. The complexity of the decision demands a systematic, "well-reasoned" and "dynamic" approach. Due to clinical urgency, this standard cannot always be met prior to initiation of ECMO. We challenge the paradigm of "candidacy" as a singular decision that must be defined prior to ECMO initiation. Rather, the determination as to whether ECMO is in the patient's best interest is applicable regardless of cannulation status. The priority should be on collaborative, interdisciplinary decision-making processes aligned with principles of transparency, relevant reasoning, accountability, review, and appeal. To ensure a robust process, it should not be temporally constrained by cannulation status. We advocate that this approach will decrease both the risk of not initiating ECMO in a patient who will benefit and the risk of prolonged, nonbeneficial support. We conclude that to ensure fair decisions are made in a patient's best interest, organizations should develop procedurally fair processes for ECMO decision-making that are not tied to a particular time point and are revisited along the management trajectory.

Discipline-Specific Perspectives on Caring for Babies with Trisomy 13 or 18 in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

Care offerings vary across medical settings and between families for babies with trisomy 13 or 18. The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore nurse, advanced practice practitioner, and neonatologist perspectives on care for babies with trisomy 13 or 18 in the intensive care unit.

STUDY DESIGN

Voice-recorded qualitative interviews occurred with 64 participants (41 bedside nurses, 14 advance practice practitioners, and 9 neonatologists) from two neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in the midwestern United States. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines were followed. Content analyses occurred utilizing MAXQDA (VERBI Software, 2020).

RESULTS

Over half of NICU staff perceived care for babies with trisomy 13 or 18 as different from care for other babies with critical chronic illness. Qualitative themes included internal conflict, variable presentation and prognosis, grappling with uncertainty, family experiences, and provision of meaningful care. Neonatologists emphasized the variability of presentation and prognosis, while nurses emphasized provision of meaningful care. Phrases "hard/difficult" were spoken 31 times; primarily describing the comorbidities, complexities, and prognostic uncertainty.

CONCLUSION

Care for babies with these genetic diagnoses reveals need for a shared dialogue not only with families but also across staff disciplines. While perspectives differ, participants depicted striving to offer compassionate, family-centered care while also balancing biomedical uncertainty about interventions for children with trisomy 13 and 18.

KEY POINTS

· Care for babies with trisomy 13 or 18 has been recognized as shifting.. · Controversy exists across the diverse and changing range of care models.. · This study describes perspectives of bedside neonatal nurses, advanced practitioners, and neonatologists.. · Differences in perspectives warrant attentiveness to insights and dialogue across disciplines..

Ethical Considerations in Ever-Expanding Utilization of ECLS: A Research Agenda

Technological advancements and rapid expansion in the clinical use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) across all age ranges in the last decade, including during the COVID-19 pandemic, has led to important ethical considerations. As a costly and resource intensive therapy, ECLS is used emergently under high stakes circumstances where there is often prognostic uncertainty and risk for serious complications. To develop a research agenda to further characterize and address these ethical dilemmas, a working group of specialists in ECLS, critical care, cardiothoracic surgery, palliative care, and bioethics convened at a single pediatric academic institution over the course of 18 months. Using an iterative consensus process, research questions were selected based on: (1) frequency, (2) uniqueness to ECLS, (3) urgency, (4) feasibility to study, and (5) potential to improve patient care. Questions were categorized into broad domains of societal decision-making, bedside decision-making, patient and family communication, medical team dynamics, and research design and implementation. A deeper exploration of these ethical dilemmas through formalized research and deliberation may improve equitable access and quality of ECLS-related medical care.

Decision-Making, Ethics, and End-of-Life Care in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

Pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We sought to summarize literature on communication and decision-making, end-of-life care, and ethical issues to identify recommended approaches and highlight knowledge gaps.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library.

STUDY SELECTION

We reviewed published articles (1972-2020) which examined three pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation domains: 1) decision-making or communication between clinicians and patients/families, 2) ethical issues, or 3) end-of-life care.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 2,581 publications screened, we identified one systematic review and 35 descriptive studies. No practical guides exist for communication and decision-making in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Conversation principles and parent/clinician perspectives are described. Ethical issues related to consent, initiation, discontinuation, resource allocation, and research. No patient-level synthesis of ethical issues or end-of-life care in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite numerous ethical issues reported surrounding pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, we found limited patient-level research and no practical guides for communicating with families or managing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation discontinuation.

Ethical factors determining ECMO allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

ECMO is a particularly scarce resource during the COVID-19 pandemic. Its allocation involves ethical considerations that may be different to usual times. There is limited pre-pandemic literature on the ethical factors that ECMO physicians consider during ECMO allocation. During the pandemic, there has been relatively little professional guidance specifically relating to ethics and ECMO allocation; although there has been active ethical debate about allocation of other critical care resources. We report the results of a small international exploratory survey of ECMO clinicians’ views on different patient factors in ECMO decision-making prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We then outline current ethical decision procedures and recommendations for rationing life-sustaining treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic, and examine the extent to which current guidelines for ECMO allocation (and reported practice) adhere to these ethical guidelines and recommendations.

Methods

An online survey was performed with responses recorded between mid May and mid August 2020. Participants (n = 48) were sourced from the ECMOCard study group—an international group of experts (n = 120) taking part in a prospective international study of ECMO and intensive care for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey compared the extent to which certain ethical factors involved in ECMO resource allocation were considered prior to and during the pandemic.

Results

When initiating ECMO during the pandemic, compared to usual times, participants reported giving more ethical weight to the benefit of ECMO to other patients not yet admitted as opposed to those already receiving ECMO, (p < 0.001). If a full unit were referred a good candidate for ECMO, participants were more likely during the pandemic to consider discontinuing ECMO from a current patient with low chance of survival (53% during pandemic vs. 33% prior p = 0.002). If the clinical team recommends that ECMO should cease, but family do not agree, the majority of participants indicated that they would continue treatment, both in usual circumstances (67%) and during the pandemic (56%).

Conclusions

We found differences during the COVID-19 pandemic in prioritisation of several ethical factors in the context of ECMO allocation. The ethical principles prioritised by survey participants were largely consistent with ECMO allocation guidelines, current ethical decision procedures and recommendations for allocation of life-sustaining treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00638-y.

Risk Factors for Mortality in Refractory Pediatric Septic Shock Supported with Extracorporeal Life Support

Risk factors for mortality in children with refractory pediatric septic shock who are supported with extracorporeal life support (ECLS) are largely unknown. Therefore, we performed univariable and multivariable analyses to determine risk factors for mortality among children (<19 years) who underwent an ECLS run between January 2012 and September 2014 at eight tertiary pediatric hospitals, and who had septic shock based on 2005 International Consensus Criteria. Of the 514 children treated with ECLS during the study period, 70 were identified with septic shock. The mortality rate was similar between those with (54.3%) and without septic shock (43.7%). Among those with septic shock, significant risk factors for mortality included cardiac failure or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) as indication for ECLS cannulation compared with respiratory failure (P = 0.003), having a new neurologic event following cannulation (P = 0.032), acquiring a new infection following cannulation (P = 0.005), inability to normalize pH in the 48 hours following ECLS cannulation (P = 0.010), and requiring higher daily volume of platelet transfusions (P = 0.005). These findings can be used to help guide clinical decision making for children with septic shock that is refractory to medical management.

Outcomes After Extracorporeal Life Support Cannulation in Pediatric Patients With Trisomy 13 and Trisomy 18

BACKGROUND

Indications for extracorporeal life support (ECLS) have evolved and expanded, yet its use in trisomy 13 (T13) and trisomy 18 (T18) patients remains controversial. We reviewed the experience of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization with ECLS in these patients to inform practice at our institution.

METHODS

The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry was queried for all patients younger than 18 y with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition/Tenth Edition code for T13 or T18 from 2000 to 2018. Basic demographics, ECLS details, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were identified (15 with T13; 13 with T18), representing 0.06% (28 of 46,901) of pediatric ECLS cannulations. The median weight was 3.5 kg (range, 1.4-13), and age at cannulation was 52 d (range, 0 d-6.8 y). Time on ECLS ranged from 13 to 478 h (median, 114). Cardiac defects were diagnosed in 19 (68%) patients, of which 13 (46%) underwent surgical repair. Median oxygenation index pre-ECLS was 45. Venoarterial cannulations accounted for 82% of patients, whereas 14% underwent venovenous cannulation. Overall survival to hospital discharge was 46% with 86% of patients experiencing one or more complications. There were no survivors when cannulation continued past 12 d.

CONCLUSIONS

Although complications are frequent, the mortality rate in patients with T13 and T18 remains within the reported range for the general pediatric population. T13 and T18 alone should not be viewed as absolute contraindications to ECLS within the pediatric population but rather considered during the evaluation of a patient's potential candidacy.

Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation in paediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: overrated or underutilized?

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a modified form of cardiopulmonary bypass which may provide support for severe cardiorespiratory failure including paediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). While ECMO was initially demonstrated to successfully support neonates with severe respiratory failure, the use of ECMO has expanded rapidly to support both paediatric and adult respiratory failure. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry data shows that the use of ECMO for paediatric respiratory failure has expanded rapidly over the past decades with increasing use of venovenous ECMO. Despite the increasing complexity of children supported by ECMO for ARDS, outcomes have remained consistent with survival to hospital discharge greater than 50%. ECMO complications are still common and potentially devastating, especially neurological complications. There is grade 1 evidence to support the use of ECMO in both neonatal and adult respiratory failure but evidence in paediatric respiratory failure is confined to case series and case-control studies. While there are no published guidelines for use of ECMO in PARDS, in particular no clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, current evidence suggests that children with severe ARDS may benefit from ECMO support, with survival to hospital discharge equivalent or better than conventional management in children with severe ARDS.

Controversies in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair using a Delphi approach: from the American Pediatric Surgical Association Critical Care Committee (APSA-CCC)

PURPOSE

Review current practices and expert opinions on contraindications to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and contraindications to repair of CDH following initiation of ECMO.

METHODS

Modified Delphi method was employed to achieve consensus among members of the American Pediatric Surgical Association Critical Care Committee (APSA-CCC).

RESULTS

Overall response rate was 81% including current and former members of the APSA-CCC. An average of 5-15 CDH repairs were reported annually per institution; 26-50% of patients required ECMO. 100% of respondents would not offer ECMO to a patient with a complex or unrepairable cardiac defects or lethal chromosomal abnormality; 94.1% would not in the setting of severe intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). 76.5% and 72.2% of respondents would not offer CDH repair to patients on ECMO with grade III-IV ICH or new diagnosis of lethal genetic or metabolic abnormalities, respectively. There was significant variability in whether or not to repair CDH if unable to wean from ECMO at 4-5 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variability in practice pattern and opinions exist regarding contraindications to ECMO and when to offer repair of CDH for patients on ECMO. Ongoing work to evaluate outcomes is needed to standardize management and minimize potentially futile interventions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V (expert opinion).

Creation of an empiric tool to predict ECMO deployment in pediatric respiratory or cardiac failure

PURPOSE

To create a real-time prediction tool to predict probability of ECMO deployment in children with cardiac or pulmonary failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients ≤18 years old admitted to an ICU that participated in the Virtual Pediatric Systems database (2009-2015) were included. Logistic regression models using adaptive lasso methodology were used to identify independent factors associated with ECMO use.

RESULTS

A total of 538,202 ICU patients from 140 ICUs qualified for inclusion. ECMO was deployed in 3484 patients (0.6%) with a mortality of 1450 patients (41.6%). The factors associated with increased probability of ECMO use included: younger age, pulmonary hypertension, congenital heart disease, high-complexity cardiac surgery, cardiomyopathy, acute lung injury, shock, renal failure, cardiac arrest, use of nitric oxide, use of either conventional mechanical ventilation or high frequency oscillatory ventilation, and higher annual ECMO center volume. The area under the receiver operating curve for this model was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93). This tool can be accessed at https://soipredictiontool.shinyapps.io/ECMORisk/.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we present a tool to predict ECMO deployment among critically ill children; this tool will help create real-time risk stratification among critically ill children, and it will help with benchmarking, family counseling, and research.

Eliciting Narratives to Inform Care for Infants With Trisomy 18

: media-1vid110.1542/5804913218001PEDS-VA_2018-0321Video Abstract.

Survey of the American Pediatric Surgical Association on cannulation practices in pediatric ECMO

AIMS

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a commonly used modality of life support for children with cardiopulmonary failure. Consensus on pediatric cannulation strategies and management does not currently exist. The goal of this study was to investigate individual surgeon approaches towards ECMO cannulations in children.

METHODS

A 21-question online survey was developed and disseminated to the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) membership. Participant responses were summarized as counts and percentages. Effect of ECMO volume and surgeon experience on responses was assessed.

RESULTS

There were 252 APSA members who participated in this study for a response rate of 21%, with 225 (89.3%) performing ECMO. Sixty respondents (28.3%) reported using neck vessels exclusively for cannulation regardless of age or weight of the patient. After neck decannulation, 13 (6.6%) repaired the carotid artery for all patients, and 21 (10.7%) repaired only for children older than 5years. Of those performing femoral cannulation, 56 (26.4%) would perform at 5years or older and 66 (31.1%) at 12years. The most common challenge for femoral cannulation was the need for distal perfusion (n=119; 59.8%). Assistance from vascular surgery was requested by 32 (16.4%) for distal perfusion catheter placement, and by 79 (40.5%) for decannulation. Regarding femoral cannulation, lack of training was more likely to be a challenge if performing <5 cannulations per year (25.2% vs 12.5%; p=0.03). Surgeons with <10years of experience were more likely to consult vascular surgery compared to those with >10years of experience (18.5% vs 8%; p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Considerable variation exists in individual surgeon cannulation practices in pediatric ECMO, in particular in the management of school age and adolescent VA ECMO. Mixed approaches across several ECMO management case study questions indicate that further work is needed to evaluate specific risks with cannulations in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in individuals with thoracic insufficiency

INTRODUCTION

Respiratory failure is the leading cause of mortality in individuals with congenital spine and rib deformities. We present a case report of a child with Jeune syndrome surviving respiratory failure using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We also summarize thoracic insufficiency syndrome cases reported in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry.

CASE REPORT

A two-year-old male with a chest circumference less than a third percentile for age was admitted with influenza pneumonia developing a peak oxygenation index of 103.5. The child survived to baseline pulmonary function after nine days of venous-arterial ECMO support.

DISCUSSION

The ELSO registry contained 27 individuals with a surrogate diagnosis of thoracic insufficiency (0.05%). There was no significant difference in survival to discharge for thoracic insufficiency patients (52%) compared to a previously healthy population supported with ECMO.

CONCLUSION

ECMO is safe and may be effective in supporting individuals with thoracic insufficiency.

Does Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Improve Survival in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Failure?

RATIONALE

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has supported gas exchange in children with severe respiratory failure for more than 40 years, without ECMO efficacy studies.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the mortality and functional status of children with severe acute respiratory failure supported with and without ECMO.

METHODS

This cohort study compared ECMO-supported children to pair-matched non-ECMO-supported control subjects with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Both individual case matching and propensity score matching were used. The study sample was selected from children enrolled in the cluster-randomized RESTORE (Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure) clinical trial. Detailed demographic and daily physiologic data were used to match patients. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital-free days, ventilator-free days, and change in functional status at hospital discharge.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 2,449 children in the RESTORE trial, 879 (35.9%) non-ECMO-supported patients with severe ARDS were eligible to match to 61 (2.5%) ECMO-supported children. When individual case matching was used (60 matched pairs), the in-hospital mortality rate at 90 days was 25% (15 of 60) for both the ECMO-supported and non-ECMO-supported children (P > 0.99). With propensity score matching (61 matched pairs), the ECMO-supported in-hospital mortality rate was 15 of 61 (25%), and the non-ECMO-supported hospital mortality rate was 18 of 61 (30%) (P = 0.70). There was no difference between ECMO-supported and non-ECMO-supported patients in any secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with severe ARDS, our results do not demonstrate that ECMO-supported children have superior outcomes compared with non-ECMO-supported children. Definitive answers will require a rigorous multisite randomized controlled trial.

Pediatric ECMO Research: The Case for Collaboration

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the pediatric age has increased considerably in the last decade, as has the complexity of cases and the variety of indications outside of the neonatal age. However, no randomized controlled trials have been attempted to date to test ECMO as an intervention in non-neonatal pediatric patients with critical illness. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the history of clinical research in pediatric ECMO and discuss methodological challenges including heterogeneity of ages and diagnoses in the pediatric ECMO population, rapid advances in technology and clinical practice related to ECMO, feasibility of enrolling critically ill children on ECMO in clinical research studies, and variability in ECMO management across institutions and countries. Lastly, we discuss opportunities and existing infrastructure for future multicenter, multi-network research collaborations for pediatric ECMO studies.