End-of-Life Decisions 20 Years after EURONIC: Neonatologists' Self-Reported Practices, Attitudes, and Treatment Choices in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria

Severe generalized edema in a premature neonate: A case report and literature review

Key Clinical Message

With no family history, and an atypical phenotype, the clinical diagnosing of Noonan syndrome (NS) can be very difficult. The present case emphasized that generalized edema in neonates may be the potential first symptom of NS.

Abstract

Severe generalized edema is a rare pathological condition with high mortality in newborns, in particular the premature infants. It is characterized by the extensive subcutaneous tissue edema and the accumulation of fluid in neonatal body fluid compartments. The etiology and pathogenesis of hydrops in neonates are quite complex. Generally speaking, hydrops can be divided into immune hydrops and non-immune hydrops according to the etiology. It is still challenging in treating severe neonatal edema. In this study, we presented a preterm newborn with severe generalized edema after birth, which was finally diagnosed with Noonan syndrome (NS). The infant clinically manifested as severe generalized edema alone, without the involvement of multiple organ malformation. Generalized edema in neonates was probably the first symptom of NS. Therefore, differential diagnosis of NS is necessary for infants developing generalized edema.

Cause of death and making end-of-life decisions in preterm infants has not changed over time: A mortality follow-back survey

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate changes over time in cause of death and making end-of-life decisions in preterm infants.

METHODS

A follow-back survey was conducted of all preterm infants who died between September 2016 and December 2017 in Flanders and Brussels, Belgium. Cause of death was obtained from the death certificate and information on end-of-life decisions (ELDs) through an anonymous questionnaire of the certifying physician. Results were compared with a previous study performed between August 1999 and July 2000.

RESULTS

In the cohort 1999-2000 and 2016-2017, respectively, 150 and 135 deaths were included. A significantly higher proportion of infants born before 26 weeks of gestation was found in the 2016-2017 cohort (53% vs. 24% in 1999-2000, p < 0.001). Extreme immaturity (<26 weeks) remained the most prevalent cause with a significant increase in the 2016-2017 cohort (48% vs. 28% in 1999-2000, p < 0.001). The overall prevalence of ELDs was similar across study periods (61%). Non-treatment decisions remained the most common ELD (36% and 37%).

CONCLUSION

Infants born at the limits of viability have become more prevalent among infant deaths, possibly due to a change in attitude towards periviable births. Neither the process of making ELDs nor the cause of death has changed over time.

Social Determinants of Health and Redirection of Care for Infants Born Extremely Preterm

Importance

Redirection of care refers to withdrawal, withholding, or limiting escalation of treatment. Whether maternal social determinants of health are associated with redirection of care discussions merits understanding.

Objective

To examine associations between maternal social determinants of health and redirection of care discussions for infants born extremely preterm.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of infants born at less than 29 weeks' gestation between April 2011 and December 2020 at 19 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network centers in the US. Follow-up occurred between January 2013 and October 2023. Included infants received active treatment at birth and had mothers who identified as Black or White. Race was limited to Black and White based on service disparities between these groups and limited sample size for other races. Maternal social determinant of health exposures were education level (high school nongraduate or graduate), insurance type (public/none or private), race (Black or White), and ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was documented discussion about redirection of infant care. Secondary outcomes included subsequent redirection of care occurrence and, for those born at less than 27 weeks' gestation, death and neurodevelopmental impairment at 22 to 26 months' corrected age.

Results

Of the 15 629 infants (mean [SD] gestational age, 26 [2] weeks; 7961 [51%] male) from 13 643 mothers, 2324 (15%) had documented redirection of care discussions. In unadjusted comparisons, there was no significant difference in the percentage of infants with redirection of care discussions by race (Black, 1004/6793 [15%]; White, 1320/8836 [15%]) or ethnicity (Hispanic, 291/2105 [14%]; non-Hispanic, 2020/13 408 [15%]). However, after controlling for maternal and neonatal factors, infants whose mothers identified as Black or as Hispanic were less likely to have documented redirection of care discussions than infants whose mothers identified as White (Black vs White adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96) or as non-Hispanic (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic aOR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.87). Redirection of care discussion occurrence did not differ by maternal education level or insurance type.

Conclusions and Relevance

For infants born extremely preterm, redirection of care discussions occurred less often for Black and Hispanic infants than for White and non-Hispanic infants. It is important to explore the possible reasons underlying these differences.

Public Attitudes Toward Ethics and Practices in End-of-Life Decision-Making for Neonates

Importance

Attitudes toward end-of-life decision-making in neonatology have been studied in physicians and other health care professionals and are mostly shaped by their clinical education and work experiences. In contrast, attitudes among the general public have not yet been investigated.

Objective

To assess (1) attitudes in the general public toward euthanasia and withdrawal of life-prolonging treatment in neonates with severe life-limiting conditions, (2) knowledge of current German recommendations, and (3) values in the German society regarding ethical issues and proxy decisions at the beginning of life.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study was performed in Germany and used an exploratory design to analyze responses to an interview conducted by an independent, established commissioned polling institute in March and April 2022. Participants were 16 years or older, with German language fluency and comprehension and living in Germany.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Knowledge about recommendations for euthanasia and withdrawal of life-prolonging treatment as well as personal attitudes toward (1) euthanasia and withdrawal of life-prolonging treatment and (2) surrogate end-of-life decision-making for newborn infants were assessed.

Results

The study included 2116 participants (1077 females [50.9%]; mean [SD] age 52.1 [18.7] years). Of the participants, 16.8% (311 of 1851) reported knowing the German recommendations for euthanasia and withdrawal of life-prolonging treatment for neonates. Euthanasia and withdrawal of life-prolonging treatment were supported by 64.7% (1369 of 2116) and 77.9% (1649 of 2116) of respondents, respectively. Shared decision-making between parents and physicians for neonates in end-of-life situations was supported by 65.6% of participants (1388). In situations where shared decision-making was not possible, 73.4% of respondents (1019 of 1388) put the ultimate decision to the parents. The magnitude of the associations was low between sociodemographic factors and views on ethical issues and customary practices involved in end-of-life decisions for neonates.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this cross-sectional study suggested that most respondents were not aware of the national German recommendations for euthanasia and withdrawal of life-prolonging treatment for sick and extremely preterm newborns. When counseling parents of periviable newborns, clinicians may need to exert more effort in explaining the legal and ethical framework; a highly individualized approach is warranted.

German obstetrician's self-reported attitudes and handling in threatening preterm birth at the limits of viability

OBJECTIVES

Antenatal treatment and information influences the course of pregnancy and parental decision-making in cases of threatened prematurity on the borderline of viability. Numerous studies have shown significant interprofessional differences in assessing ethical boundary decisions; hence, this study aimed to evaluate obstetricians attitudes, practices and antenatal parental counseling regarding threatened preterm birth in Germany.

METHODS

An anonymous online questionnaire was administered to 543 obstetricians at tertiary perinatal centers and prenatal diagnostic centers in Germany. The survey contained questions on basic ethical issues assessed using the Likert scale and a case vignette regarding the practical procedures of an imminent extreme premature birth at 23 1/7 gestational weeks.

RESULTS

In the case of unstoppable preterm birth, 15 % of clinicians said they would carry out a cesarean section; however, specialists from centers with a high number of very low birth weight infants would do so significantly more often. Among respondents, 29.8 % did not take any therapeutic measures without discussing the child's treatment options with their parents, 19.9 % refused to offer actionable advice to the parents, and 57 % said they would advise parents to seek intensive care treatment for the child with the option of changing treatment destination in the event of serious complications. Moreover, 84 % said they would provide information together with neonatologists.

CONCLUSIONS

Joint counseling with neonatologists is widely accepted. The size of the perinatal center significantly influences the practical approach to threatened preterm births. Respect for parents' decision-making autonomy regarding the child's treatment options is central and influences therapy initiation.

Moral distress among neonatologists working in neonatal intensive care units in Greece: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Working as a neonatologist in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is stressful and involves ethically challenging situations. These situations may cause neonatologists to experience high levels of moral distress, especially in the context of caring for extremely premature infants (EPIs). In Greece, moral distress among neonatologists working in NICUs remains understudied and warrants further exploration.

METHODS

This prospective qualitative study was conducted from March to August 2022. A combination of purposive and snowball sampling was used and data were collected by semi-structured interviews with twenty neonatologists. Data were classified and analyzed by thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

A variety of distinct themes and subthemes emerged from the analysis of the interview data. Neonatologists face moral uncertainty. Furthermore, they prioritize their traditional (Hippocratic) role as healers. Importantly, neonatologists seek third-party support for their decisions to reduce their decision uncertainty. In addition, based on the analysis of the interview data, multiple predisposing factors that foster and facilitate neonatologists' moral distress emerged, as did multiple predisposing factors that are sometimes associated with neonatologists' constraint distress and sometimes associated with their uncertainty distress. The predisposing factors that foster and facilitate neonatologists' moral distress thus identified include the lack of previous experience on the part of neonatologists, the lack of clear and adequate clinical practice guidelines/recommendations/protocols, the scarcity of health care resources, the fact that in the context of neonatology, the infant's best interest and quality of life are difficult to identify, and the need to make decisions in a short time frame. NICU directors, neonatologists' colleagues working in the same NICU and parental wishes and attitudes were identified as predisposing factors that are sometimes associated with neonatologists' constraint distress and sometimes associated with their uncertainty distress. Ultimately, neonatologists become more resistant to moral distress over time.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that neonatologists' moral distress should be conceptualized in the broad sense of the term and is closely associated with multiple predisposing factors. Such distress is greatly affected by interpersonal relationships. A variety of distinct themes and subthemes were identified, which, for the most part, were consistent with the findings of previous research. However, we identified some nuances that are of practical importance. The results of this study may serve as a starting point for future research.

Initiating technology dependence to sustain a child's life: a systematic review of reasons

BACKGROUND

Decision-making in initiating life-sustaining health technology is complex and often conducted at time-critical junctures in clinical care. Many of these decisions have profound, often irreversible, consequences for the child and family, as well as potential benefits for functioning, health and quality of life. Yet little is known about what influences these decisions. A systematic review of reasoning identified the range of reasons clinicians give in the literature when initiating technology dependence in a child, and as a result helps determine the range of influences on these decisions.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Web of Science, ASSIA and Global Health Library databases were searched to identify all reasons given for the initiation of technology dependence in a child. Each reason was coded as a broad and narrow reason type, and whether it supported or rejected technology dependence.

RESULTS

53 relevant papers were retained from 1604 publications, containing 116 broad reason types and 383 narrow reason types. These were grouped into broad thematic categories: clinical factors, quality of life factors, moral imperatives and duty and personal values; and whether they supported, rejected or described the initiation of technology dependence. The majority were conceptual or discussion papers, less than a third were empirical studies. Most discussed neonates and focused on end-of-life care.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of empirical studies on this topic, scant knowledge about the experience of older children and their families in particular; and little written on choices made outside 'end-of-life' care. This review provides a sound basis for empirical research into the important influences on a child's potential technology dependence.

Postponed Withholding: Balanced Decision-Making at the Margins of Viability

Advances in neonatology have led to improved survival for periviable infants. Immaturity still carries a high risk of short- and long-term harms, and uncertainty turns provision of life support into an ethical dilemma. Shared decision-making with parents has gained ground. However, the need to start immediate life support and the ensuing difficulty of withdrawing treatment stands in tension with the possibility of a fair decision-making process. Both the parental "instinct of saving" and "withdrawal resistance" involved can preclude shared decision-making. To help health care personnel and empower parents, we propose a novel approach labeled "postponed withholding." In the absence of a prenatal advance directive, life support is started at birth, followed by planned redirection to palliative care after one week, unless parents, after a thorough counseling process, actively ask for continued life support. Despite the emotional challenges, this approach can facilitate ethically balanced decision-making processes in the gray zone.

Federal regulations and neonatologists' views on care of seriously ill infants: changes over time

BACKGROUND

The Baby Doe Regulations (BDR) regulate provision of life-sustaining treatment to seriously ill neonates. In 2020, the Trump administration expanded upon these through the Executive Order on Protecting Vulnerable Newborn and Infant Children (EO-PVNIC). Neonatologists were surveyed in 1988 to determine their opinions on the regulations. We sought to compare views of neonatologists from 1988 and 2021 in relation to three hypothetical cases and about the impact of the BDR and to evaluate perceptions of the EO-PVNIC.

METHODS

We modified and distributed the 1988 survey to members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal Perinatal Medicine. We used Chi-squared tests to compare responses in 1988 to responses in 2021.

RESULTS

We received 445 survey responses. Neonatologists today felt less compelled to provide aggressive care to the hypothetical patients, felt less constrained by the regulations, and were more likely to report that parental wishes would impact their actions.

CONCLUSIONS

There have been shifts in neonatologists' perceptions of the Baby Doe Regulations toward less aggressive medical treatment for seriously ill neonates and more shared decision-making. Further research is required to identify how practices have been impacted over these decades.

IMPACT

Neonatologists in the 1980s largely objected to the Baby Doe regulations, fearing the regulations would restrict their ability to provide optimal care to seriously ill neonates. Though still in place, current perceptions of these and newer regulations are unknown. Perspectives on the Baby Doe regulations have changed since their enactment and with the addition of newer, more restrictive regulations. Neonatologists today may favor less aggressive management in the face of poor prognosis. Neonatologists may also favor more shared decision-making now as compared to the past.

Neonatal Nurses' Perceptions and Needs of End-of-Life Care Practice: A Jordanian Qualitative Study

End-of-life (EOL) care for newborns is challenging and requires well-prepared nurses to provide the best care for the dying baby and to prepare and support parents during such a difficult experience. This study aimed to explore Jordanian neonatal intensive care unit nurses' perceptions and needs regarding the provision of EOL care. This study used an exploratory descriptive qualitative approach and was conducted among a sample of 12 Jordanian neonatal intensive care unit nurses. Semistructured interviews were conducted to allow the nurses to describe their personal experiences and express their needs related to the provision of EOL care. Two main themes and 6 subthemes emerged from the analysis process. Main themes were (1) the challenges related to the provision of EOL care, and (2) nurses' needs: what matters most. The findings of this study shed light on neonatal care unit nurses' experiences and needs related to the provision of EOL care. The results of this study may be used to develop EOL care guidelines, programs, and protocols to be applied in intensive care units.

End-of-life decisions in neonates and infants: a nationwide mortality follow-back survey

OBJECTIVES

Neonatology has undergone important clinical and legal changes; however, the implications for end-of-life decision-making in seriously ill neonates to date are unknown. Our aim was to examine changes in prevalence and characteristics of end-of-life decisions (ELDs) in neonatology.

METHODS

We performed a nationwide mortality follow-back survey in August 1999 to July 2000 and September 2016 to December 2017 in Flanders, Belgium. Data were linked to information from death certificates. For each death under the age of 1, physicians were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire about which ELDs were made preceding death.

RESULTS

The response rate was 87% in 1999-2000 (253/292) and 83% in 2016-2017 (229/276). The proportion of deaths of infants born before 26 weeks' gestation was increased (14% vs 34%, p=0.001). Prevalence of ELDs remained stable at 60%, with non-treatment decisions occurring in about 35% of all deaths. Use of medication with an explicit life-shortening intention was prevalent in 7%-10% of all deaths. In early neonatal death (<7 days old) medication with an explicit life-shortening intention decreased from 12% to 6%, in late neonatal death (7-27 days old), it increased from 0% to 26%, and in postneonatal death (>27 days old), it increased from 2% to 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

Over a timespan of 17 year, the prevalence of neonatal ELDs has remained stable. A substantial number of deaths was preceded by the intentionally hastening of death by administrating medication. While surveying solely the physician perspective in this paper, there is a need for an open multidisciplinary debate, including, for example, nursing staff and family members, based on clinical as well as ethical and jurisdictional reflections to discuss the need for international guidelines.

Nurses' involvement in end-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care units

BACKGROUND

End-of-life decision-making for terminally ill neonates raises important legal and ethical issues. In Greece, no recent data on nurses' attitudes and involvement in end-of-life decisions are available.

RESEARCH QUESTION/AIM

To investigate neonatal nurses' attitudes and involvement in end-of-life decisions and the relation to their socio-demographic and work-related background data.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A survey was carried out in 28 neonatal intensive care units between September 2018 and January 2019. A structured questionnaire was distributed by post.

PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT

The questionnaire was answered anonymously by 312 nurses (response rate, 71.1%) and returned to the investigators.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The study was approved by the Bioethics and Research Committee of Aretaieio Hospital in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

FINDINGS

Nurses more often reported involvement in various end-of-life decisions, such as continuation of treatment without adding further therapeutic interventions for terminally ill neonates, while less reported were mechanical ventilation withdrawal and drug administration to end life. Nurses with a high attitude score, reflecting a more quality-of-life approach, were more likely to be involved in setting limits to intensive care. α low score was consistent with life preservation. Nurses' religiousness (p = 0.097), parenthood (p = 0.093), involvement in daily practice (p = 0.03), and position on the existing legal framework (p < 0.002) influenced their attitude score.

DISCUSSION

The likelihood of nurses to support interventions in neonates with poor prognosis in neonatal intensive care units was related to their attitudes. After adjusting for potential confounders, the most important predictors for nurses' attitudes were parenthood, involvement in daily practice, and position supporting current legislation reform.

CONCLUSION

Variability in involvement in end-of-life decisions among nurses exists on a national level.

Impact of Dying Neonates on Doctors' and Nurses' Personhood: A Systematic Scoping Review

CONTEXT

Caring for dying neonates is distressing for healthcare professionals (HCP)s. Yet, the extent of these effects is poorly understood, compromising support of HCPs. To better understand and support HCPs, a systematic scoping review (SSR) of prevailing data is proposed.

OBJECTIVES

In mapping prevailing data on the impact of caring for dying neonates on HCPs, an SSR proffers new insights on changes to their beliefs, values, coping, actions, relationships and self-concepts of personhood.

METHODS

Krishna's Systematic Evidenced Based Approach (SEBA) supports a robust, reproducible review whilst its constructivist approach and relativist lens effectively contends with diverse data sources, facilitating a holistic study.

RESULTS

A total of 9826 abstracts were reviewed and 69 articles were included. Thematic and content analysis were used simultanously. The four categories drawn from the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) complements the four themes identified: Emotional and Physical Difficulties, Coping Mechanisms, Conflict and Recommendations.

CONCLUSION

In highlighting significant longitudinal effects upon all aspects of their lives, this SSR in SEBA reveals a critical need for timely, appropriate and personalized support. We recommend adapting the RToP as an assessment tool to identify and evaluate the needs of these HCPs. It may also be used to structure a holistic support mechanism. Future studies are required to validate its use and appraise other aspects of support available for HCPs.

Development of a small baby unit to improve outcomes for the extremely premature infant

Survival and outcomes for extremely premature (EP) infants have improved and even infants born at 23 and 24 weeks that were previously considered non-viable are now routinely surviving. This review describes our particular institution's basis for and process of creating and sustaining a small baby program for a quaternary, referral-based neonatal intensive care unit. Through multi-disciplinary collaboration, small baby guidelines were developed that established uniform care and optimized evidence-based practice for the care of this unique patient population. A focus on parent-centered care while removing noxious stimuli for the patient has improved neurodevelopmental outcomes. Data collection, quality improvement, and ongoing research are incorporated in the small baby program to establish and sustain best practices and outcomes for the EP patient. Through the establishment of a small baby unit, we have improved survival, decreased short-term morbidities, and improved neurodevelopmental outcomes for the EP infant in our region.

Approaches to the initiation of life-sustaining technology in children: A scoping review of changes over time

Little is understood about the dynamic circumstances within which the initiation of technology dependence takes place in children. The aim of this scoping review was to identify the influences on the initiation of technology dependence and the issues that require further exploration and consideration. Scientific literature that directly or indirectly discussed the initiation of technology dependence in children was identified. A three-stage screening process of title and abstract scrutiny, full-text scanning and in-depth full-text reading resulted in 63 relevant articles from 1133 initially reviewed. These were then subjected to descriptive and thematic analysis. Articles ranged from the 1970s to the present, reflecting the evolution of ethical debates around the approaches to clinical practice and changes in cultural and societal attitudes. Three themes emerged: how technology alters the meaning of futile care, dissonance in the perspectives of decision makers and increasing support for joint decision-making. Only articles in English and predominantly from the clinician's rather than the patient's perspective were included. Societal and cultural factors as well as the structural, financial and cultural environment influence the initiation of technology dependence in children. However, to what extent these overt and implicit influences guide decision-makers in this field remains largely unknown.

Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making: The Possible Behavior of Greek Physicians, Midwives, and Nurses in Clinical Scenarios

Background: This study investigates the acceptability, bioethical justification, and determinants of the provision of intensive care to extremely preterm or ill neonates among healthcare professionals serving in NICUs in Greek hospitals. Methods: Healthcare professionals (71 physicians, 98 midwives, and 82 nurses) employed full-time at all public Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) (n = 17) in Greece were asked to report their potential behavior in three clinical scenarios. Results: The majority of healthcare professionals would start and continue intensive care to (a) an extremely preterm neonate, (b) a full-term neonate with an unfavorable prognosis, and (c) a neonate with complete phocomelia. In cases (a) and (b), midwives and nurses compared to physicians (p = 0.009 and p = 0.004 in scenarios (a) and (b), respectively) and health professionals ascribing to the quality-of-life principle compared to those ascribing to the intrinsic value of life (p = 0.001 and p = 0.01 scenarios (a) and (b) respectively), tend towards withholding or withdrawing care. Religion plays an important role in all three scenarios (p = 0.005, p = 0.017 and p = 0.043, respectively). Conclusions: Understanding healthcare professionals’ therapeutic intensiveness in the face of NICU ethical dilemmas can improve NICU policies, support strategies, and, consequently, the quality of neonatal intensive care.

Neonatal end-of-life decisions and ethical perspectives

End-of-life decisions are usually required when a neonate is at high risk of disability or death, and such decisions involve many legal and ethical challenges. This article reviewed the processes of ethical decision-making for severely ill or terminal neonates, considering controversial issues including the followings: (i) identifying primary decision makers, (ii) the role of law and guidelines, and (iii) changes in treatment controversy, law and regulations over twenty years in several European countries such as Switzerland, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Spain. This review study conducted on accessible articles from PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Scopus databases. Based on two studies in 2016 and 1996, neonatologists reported that withholding intensive care, withdrawing mechanical ventilation or life-saving drugs, and involvement of parents in decision-makings have become more acceptable as time passes, indicative of trend change. Trend of physicians on how end the life of neonates, at risk of death, varies in different countries, and cultural factors, parents’ involvement in decisions and gestational age are factors considered in end-of-life decision-making. Future investigations continuously need to identify upcoming ethical aspects of proper decision-making.

Frühgeborene an der Grenze der Lebensfähigkeit (Entwicklungsstufe S2k, AWMF-Leitlinien-Register Nr. 024/019, Juni 2020)

Redaktionskomitee Federführende Fachgesellschaft

Withdrawal of treatment in a pediatric intensive care unit at a Children's Hospital in China: a 10-year retrospective study

Background

Published data and practice recommendations on end-of-life care generally reflect Western practice frameworks; there are limited data on withdrawal of treatment for children in China.

Methods

Withdrawal of treatment for children in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a regional children’s hospital in eastern China from 2006 to 2017 was studied retrospectively. Withdrawal of treatment was categorized as medical withdrawal or premature withdrawal. The guardian’s self-reported reasons for abandoning the child’s treatment were recorded from 2011.

Results

The incidence of withdrawal of treatment for children in the PICU decreased significantly; for premature withdrawal the 3-year average of 15.1% in 2006–2008 decreased to 1.9% in 2015–2017 (87.4% reduction). The overall incidence of withdrawal of care reduced over the time period, and withdrawal of therapy by guardians was the main contributor to the overall reduction. The median age of children for whom treatment was withdrawn increased from 14.5 months (interquartile range: 4.0–72.0) in 2006 to 40.5 months (interquartile range: 8.0–99.0) in 2017. Among the reasons given by guardians of children whose treatment was withdrawn in 2011–2017, “illness is too severe” ranked first, accounting for 66.3%, followed by “condition has been improved” (20.9%). Only a few guardians ascribed treatment withdrawal to economic reasons.

Conclusions

The frequency of withdrawal of medical therapy has changed over time in this children’s hospital PICU, and parental decision-making has been a large part of the change.

Survey shows marked variations in approaches to redirection of care for critically ill very preterm infants in 11 countries

AIM

We surveyed care practices for critically ill very preterm infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes in Neonates (iNeo) to identify differences relevant to outcome comparisons.

METHODS

We conducted an online survey on care practices for critically ill very preterm infants and infants with severe intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). The survey was distributed in 2015 to representatives of 390 NICUs in 11 countries. Survey replies were compared with network incidence of death and severe ICH for infants born between 23^0/7 and 28^6/7  weeks of gestation from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015.

RESULTS

Most units in Israel, Japan and Tuscany, Italy, favoured withholding care when care was considered futile, whereas most units in other networks favoured redirection of care. For infants with bilateral grade 4 ICH, redirection of care was very frequently (≥90% of cases) offered in the majority of units in Australia and New Zealand and Switzerland, but rarely in other networks. Networks where redirection of care was frequently offered for severe ICH had lower rates of survivors with severe ICH.

CONCLUSION

We identified marked inter-network differences in care approaches that need to be considered when comparing outcomes.

Limitation of life-sustaining treatment in NICU: Physicians' beliefs and attitudes in the Buenos Aires region

OBJECTIVE

To explore the ethical beliefs and attitudes of Argentinean neonatologists regarding limitation of life-sustaining treatment (LST) for very sick infants.

METHODS

We used an anonymous questionnaire including direct questions and hypothetical clinical cases (inevitable demise and anticipated survival with severe long-term disability). Multivariable analysis was carried out to assess the relation between type of clinical case and physicians' LST attitudes.

RESULTS

Overall, 315 neonatologists in 34 units in the Buenos Aires region participated (response rate 54%). Most responders would agree with decisions to start or continue LST. In both clinical cases, continuing current treatment with no therapeutic escalation was the only form of LST limitation acceptable to a substantial proportion (about 60%) of neonatologists. Agreement with LST limitation was slightly but significantly more likely when death was inevitable.

CONCLUSION

Argentinean neonatologists showed a conservative attitude regarding LST limitation. Patient prognosis and options of non-treatment decision significantly influenced their choices.

Clinicians' Self-Reported Practices Related to End-of-Life Care for Infants in NICUs in Jordan

OBJECTIVE

To examine how clinical decisions are made at the end of life for infants born with specific fatal and disabling conditions in NICUs in Jordan from the perspectives of neonatal health care providers.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey of neonatal nurses and physicians.

SETTING

Twenty-four NICUs in Jordan.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants included 213 nurses and 75 physicians who provided direct care for infants in NICUs.

METHODS

Using the EURONIC questionnaire, we asked participants to recall the last experiences of end-of-life decision making in which they were involved. The participants described factors and outcomes related to those experiences, and we used descriptive and inferential statistics to examine these factors.

RESULTS

In 83% of the recalled situations, the physicians in charge of the infants' care or who were on duty were the primary decision makers. Parents, nurses, ethics committees, and NICU heads were less involved. The infants' primary diagnoses were significantly associated with the nature of decisions regarding end-of-life care (p < .001). Age, importance of religion, having their own children, and involvement in research activities were factors that significantly predicted nurses' perceived levels of involvement in decision making (χ²[4] = 23.140, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest the need to improve clinical approaches to decision making regarding end-of-life care for infants in NICUs in Jordan to be more family focused and team based. This process should include parents, physicians, neonatal nurses, and ethics committees.