Complex formation and functional interaction between adenosine A1 receptor and type-1 metabotropic glutamate receptor

Development of Putative Bivalent Dicovalent Ligands for the Adenosine A1 Receptor

Accumulating evidence suggests that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can exist and function in homodimer and heterodimer forms. The adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) has been shown to form both homodimers and heterodimers, but there is a lack of chemical tools to study these dimeric receptor populations. This work describes the synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a novel class of bivalent GPCR chemical tools, where each ligand moiety of the bivalent compound contains a sulfonyl fluoride covalent warhead designed to be capable of simultaneously reacting with each A1R of an A1R homodimer. The novel compounds were characterised using radioligand binding assays, including washout assays, and functionally in cAMP assays. The bivalent dicovalent compounds were competitive A1R antagonists and showed evidence of covalent binding and simultaneous binding across an A1R homodimer. Greater selectivity for A1R over the adenosine A3 receptor was observed for bivalent dicovalent over the equivalent monovalent compounds, indicating subtype selectivity can be achieved with dual occupation by a bivalent dicovalent ligand.

Activation of adenosine A1 receptor potentiates metabotropic glutamate receptor 1-mediated Ca2+ mobilization in the rat hippocampal marginal zone

Two subtypes of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), mGluR1 and mGluR5, participate in the regulation of cell excitability and synaptic plasticity in the central nervous system. They couple to the Gq/11 protein and release Ca2+ from the intracellular stores. In the marginal zone of the neonatal hippocampus, Cajal-Retzius (CR) cells, which control radial migration of neurons, express the subtype mGluR1. The adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) is also G-protein coupled and is extensively expressed in the central nervous system. The interactions among G-protein-coupled receptors have been predicted previously, however, there is insufficient evidence of functional interactions between naturally occurring receptors. In this study, potentiation of the mGluR1-mediated response by A1R activation was demonstrated in hippocampal CR cells. Fluorescence imaging revealed that the application of A1R agonists intensified mGluR1-induced elevation of intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i). Activation of A1R did not change [Ca2+]i. The potentiated responses were independent of extracellular Ca2+ and prevented by the Gi inhibitor. The potentiation of mGluR1-induced [Ca2+]i. elevation was also enhanced by mGluR2/3 activation. These results suggest that mGluR1 and A1R cooperatively influence postnatal hippocampal development by facilitating Ca2+ mobilization in CR cells.

Class A and C GPCR Dimers in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Neurodegenerative diseases affect over 30 million people worldwide with an ascending trend. Most individuals suffering from these irreversible brain damages belong to the elderly population, with onset between 50 and 60 years. Although the pathophysiology of such diseases is partially known, it remains unclear upon which point a disease turns degenerative. Moreover, current therapeutics can treat some of the symptoms but often have severe side effects and become less effective in long-term treatment. For many neurodegenerative diseases, the involvement of G proteincoupled receptors (GPCRs), which are key players of neuronal transmission and plasticity, has become clearer and holds great promise in elucidating their biological mechanism. With this review, we introduce and summarize class A and class C GPCRs, known to form heterodimers or oligomers to increase their signalling repertoire. Additionally, the examples discussed here were shown to display relevant alterations in brain signalling and had already been associated with the pathophysiology of certain neurodegenerative diseases. Lastly, we classified the heterodimers into two categories of crosstalk, positive or negative, for which there is known evidence.

The Pathophysiology and Treatment of Essential Tremor: The Role of Adenosine and Dopamine Receptors in Animal Models

Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common neurological disorders that often affects people in the prime of their lives, leading to a significant reduction in their quality of life, gradually making them unable to independently perform the simplest activities. Here we show that current ET pharmacotherapy often does not sufficiently alleviate disease symptoms and is completely ineffective in more than 30% of patients. At present, deep brain stimulation of the motor thalamus is the most effective ET treatment. However, like any brain surgery, it can cause many undesirable side effects; thus, it is only performed in patients with an advanced disease who are not responsive to drugs. Therefore, it seems extremely important to look for new strategies for treating ET. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on the pathomechanism of ET based on studies in animal models of the disease, as well as to present and discuss the results of research available to date on various substances affecting dopamine (mainly D3) or adenosine A1 receptors, which, due to their ability to modulate harmaline-induced tremor, may provide the basis for the development of new potential therapies for ET in the future.

G Protein-Coupled Glutamate and GABA Receptors Form Complexes and Mutually Modulate Their Signals

Molecular networks containing various proteins mediate many types of cellular processes. Elucidation of how the proteins interact will improve our understanding of the molecular integration and physiological and pharmacological propensities of the network. One of the most complicated and unexplained interactions between proteins is the inter-G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) interaction. Recently, many studies have suggested that an interaction between neurotransmitter GPCRs may mediate diverse modalities of neural responses. The B-type gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor (GBR) and type-1 metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR1) are GPCRs for GABA and glutamate, respectively, and each plays distinct roles in controlling neurotransmission. We have previously reported the possibility of their functional interaction in central neurons. Here, we examined the interaction of these GPCRs using stable cell lines and rat cerebella. Cell-surface imaging and coimmunoprecipitation analysis revealed that these GPCRs interact on the cell surface. Furthermore, fluorometry revealed that these GPCRs mutually modulate signal transduction. These findings provide solid evidence that mGluR1 and GBR have intrinsic abilities to form complexes and to mutually modulate signaling. These findings indicate that synaptic plasticity relies on a network of proteins far more complex than previously assumed.

Oligomeric Receptor Complexes and Their Allosteric Receptor-Receptor Interactions in the Plasma Membrane Represent a New Biological Principle for Integration of Signals in the CNS

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) not only exist as monomers but also as homomers and heteromers in which allosteric receptor-receptor interactions take place, modulating the functions of the participating GPCR protomers. GPCRs can also form heteroreceptor complexes with ionotropic receptors and receptor tyrosine kinases modulating their function. Furthermore, adaptor proteins interact with receptor protomers and modulate their interactions. The state of the art is that the allosteric receptor-receptor interactions are reciprocal, highly dynamic and substantially alter the signaling, trafficking, recognition and pharmacology of the participating protomers. The pattern of changes appears to be unique for each heteromer and can favor antagonistic or facilitatory interactions or switch the G protein coupling from e.g., Gi/o to Gq or to beta-arrestin signaling. It lends a new dimension to molecular integration in the nervous system. Future direction should be aimed at determining the receptor interface involving building models of selected heterodimers. This will make design of interface-interfering peptides that specifically disrupt the heterodimer possible. This will help to determine the functional role of the allosteric receptor-receptor interactions as well as the integration of signals at the plasma membrane by the heteroreceptor complexes, vs. integration of the intracellular signaling pathways. Integration of signals also at the plasma membrane seems crucial in view of the hypothesis that learning and memory at a molecular level takes place by reorganization of homo and heteroreceptor complexes in the postsynaptic membrane. Homo and heteroreceptor complexes are in balance with each other, and their disbalance is linked to disease. Targeting heteroreceptor complexes represents a novel strategy for the treatment of brain disorders.

Functional Cross-Talk between Adenosine and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors

Abstract: G-protein coupled receptors are transmembrane proteins widely expressed in cells and their transduction pathways are mediated by controlling second messenger levels through different G-protein interactions. Many of these receptors have been described as involved in the physiopathology of neurodegenerative diseases and even considered as potential targets for the design of novel therapeutic strategies. Endogenous and synthetic allosteric and orthosteric selective ligands are able to modulate GPCRs at both gene and protein expression levels and can also modify their physiological function. GPCRs that coexist in the same cells can homo- and heteromerize, therefore, modulating their function. Adenosine receptors are GPCRs which stimulate or inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity through Gi/Gs protein and are involved in the control of neurotransmitter release as glutamate. In turn, metabotropic glutamate receptors are also GPCRs which inhibit adenylyl cyclase or stimulate phospholipase C activities through Gi or Gq proteins, respectively. In recent years, evidence of crosstalk mechanisms be-tween different GPCRs have been described. The aim of the present review was to summarize the described mechanisms of interaction and crosstalking between adenosine and metabotropic glutamate receptors, mainly of group I, in both in vitro and in vivo systems, and their possible use for the design of novel ligands for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Glutamate heteroreceptor complexes in the brain

The existence of mGluR, NMDAR, AMPAR and putative KAR heteroreceptor complexes in synaptic and extrasynaptic regions of brain glutamate synapses represents a major integrative mechanism. Our aim in the current article is to analyze if the formation of the different types glutamate hetereceptor complexes involves the contribution of triplet amino acid homologies (protriplets) in a postulated receptor interface based on the triplet puzzle theory. Seven main sets (lists) of receptor pairs in databases were used containing various sets (lists) of human receptor heteromers and nonheteromers obtained from the available scientific publications including the publically available GPCR-hetnet database. Brain mGluR1-mGluR5 and mGluR2-mGluR4 isoreceptor complexes were demonstrated with a predominant extrasynaptic localization at a post- and prejunctional localization. The existence of putative mGluR4-mGluR7 heteroreceptor complexes in the basal ganglia is proposed. Metabotropic glutamate receptor subtypes also participated in the formation of a large number of heteroreceptor complexes like mGluR1-A1R, mGluR5-A2AR, mGluR5-D2R and D2R-A2AR-mGluR5, located in relation to glutamate synapses, especially in the basal ganglia. A putative mGluR1-GABAB1/2 heterocomplex may also exist. NMDAR heteroreceptor complexes were also demonstrated as a fundamental integrative mechanism in the glutamate synapse and its extrasynaptic membranes. It represented fundamental work on inter alia NMDAR-mGluR5, NMDAR-D1R and NMDAR-D2R heteroreceptor complexes involving both antagonistic and facilitatory allosteric receptor-receptor interactions. As to AMPA receptors, a heterocomplex was found for the interaction between IFNgR1 and the AMPAR mediated via the subunit GluA1 which may be of relevance for neuroinflammation. AMPAR-D2R heteroreceptor complexes were also demonstrated. Besides glutamate heteroreceptor complexes and their allosteric receptor-receptor interactions, a significant mechanism for the functional crosstalk can also be phosphorylation and/or reorganization of adapter proteins with dynamic binding to the two receptors modulating the allosteric receptor mechanism.

L-DOPA sensitizes vasomotor tone by modulating the vascular alpha1-adrenergic receptor

Blood pressure is regulated by extrinsic factors including noradrenaline, the sympathetic neurotransmitter that controls cardiovascular functions through adrenergic receptors. However, the fine-tuning system of noradrenaline signaling is relatively unknown. We here show that l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), a precursor of catecholamines, sensitizes the vascular adrenergic receptor alpha1 (ADRA1) through activation of L-DOPA receptor GPR143. In WT mice, intravenous infusion of the ADRA1 agonist phenylephrine induced a transient elevation of blood pressure. This response was attenuated in Gpr143 gene-deficient (Gpr143-/y) mice. Specific knockout of Gpr143 in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) also showed a similar phenotype, indicating that L-DOPA directly modulates ADRA1 signaling in the VSMCs. L-DOPA at nanomolar concentrations alone produced no effect on the VSMCs, but it enhanced phenylephrine-induced vasoconstriction and intracellular Ca2+ responses. Phenylephrine also augmented the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases in cultured VSMCs from WT but not Gpr143-/y mice. In WT mice, blood pressure increased during the transition from light-rest to dark-active phases. This elevation was not observed in Gpr143-/y mice. Taken together, our findings provide evidence for L-DOPA/GPR143 signaling that exerts precursor control of sympathetic neurotransmission through sensitizing vascular ADRA1.

Cardiac mGluR1 metabotropic receptors in cardioprotection

AIMS

In a previous study using a genome-wide microarray strategy, we identified metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) as a putative cardioprotective candidate in ischaemic postconditioning (PostC). In the present study, we investigated the role of cardiac mGluR1 receptors during cardioprotection against myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury in the mouse myocardium.

METHODS AND RESULTS

mGluR1 activation by glutamate administered 5 min before reperfusion in C57Bl/6 mice subjected to a myocardial ischaemia protocol strongly decreased both infarct size and DNA fragmentation measured at 24 h reperfusion. This cardioprotective effect was mimicked by the mGluR1 agonist, DHPG (10 μM), and abolished when glutamate was coinjected with the mGluR1 antagonist YM298198 (100 nM). Wortmannin (100 nM), an inhibitor of PI3-kinase, was able to prevent glutamate-induced cardioprotection. A glutamate bolus at the onset of reperfusion failed to protect the heart of mGluR1 knockout mice subjected to a myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion protocol, although PostC still protected the mGluR1 KO mice. Glutamate-treatment improved post-infarction functional recovery as evidenced by an echocardiographic study performed 15 days after treatment and by a histological evaluation of fibrosis 21 days post-treatment. Interestingly, restoration of functional mGluR1s by a PostC stimulus was evidenced at the transcriptional level. Since mGluR1s were localized at the surface membrane of cardiomyocytes, they might contribute to the cardioprotective effect of ischaemic PostC as other Gq-coupled receptors.

CONCLUSION

This study provides the first demonstration that mGluR1 activation at the onset of reperfusion induces cardioprotection and might represent a putative strategy to prevent ischaemia-reperfusion injury.

Application of surface plasmon resonance imaging to monitoring G protein-coupled receptor signaling and its modulation in a heterologous expression system

Background

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are ubiquitous surface proteins mediating various biological responses and thus, important targets for therapeutic drugs. GPCRs individually produce their own signaling as well as modulate the signaling of other GPCRs. Real-time observation of GPCR signaling and modulation in living cells is key to molecular study of biological responses and pharmaceutical development. However, fluorescence imaging, the technique widely used for this purpose, requires a fluorescent dye which may inhibit biological responses or a fluorescent-tagged target protein created through time-consuming genetic manipulation. In this study, we applied two-dimensional surface plasmon resonance (SPR) imaging to monitoring the translocation of protein kinase C (PKC), a major GPCR-coupled signaling molecule in the widely used HEK293 cell lines and examined whether the signaling of, and, modulation between heterologously expressed GPCRs can be measured without fluorescent labeling.

Results

We cultured HEK293 cells on the gold-plated slide glass and evoked SPR at the interface between the cell’s plasma membrane and the gold surface with incident light. The translocation of activated native PKC to the plasma membrane is expected to alter the incident angle-SPR extent relation, and this could be detected as a change in the intensity of light reflection from the specimen illuminated at a fixed incident angle. Direct activation of PKC with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate increased the reflection intensity. This increase indeed reported PKC translocation because it was reduced by a pre-treatment with bisindolylmaleimide-1, a PKC inhibitor. We further applied this technique to a stable HEK293 cell line heterologously expressing the GPCRs type-1 metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR1) and adenosine A1 receptor (A1R). (RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine, a mGluR1 agonist, increased the reflection intensity, and the PKC inhibitor reduced this increase. A pre-treatment with (R)-N⁶-phenylisopropyladenosine, an A1R-selective agonist suppressed mGluR1-mediated reflection increase. These results suggest that our technique can detect PKC translocation initiated by ligand binding to mGluR1 and its modulation by A1R.

Conclusions

SPR imaging turned out to be utilizable for monitoring GPCR-mediated PKC translocation and its modulation by a different GPCR in a heterologous expression system. This technique provides a powerful yet easy-to-use tool for molecular study of biological responses and pharmaceutical development.