1
|
Roos-Hesselink JW, Pelosi C, Brida M, De Backer J, Ernst S, Budts W, Baumgartner H, Oechslin E, Tobler D, Kovacs AH, Di Salvo G, Kluin J, Gatzoulis MA, Diller GP. Surveillance of adults with congenital heart disease: Current guidelines and actual clinical practice. Int J Cardiol 2024; 407:132022. [PMID: 38636602 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect with prevalence of 0.8%. Thanks to tremendous progress in medical and surgical practice, nowadays, >90% of children survive into adulthood. Recently European Society of Cardiology (ESC), American College of Cardiology (ACC)/ American Heart Association (AHA) issued guidelines which offer diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations for the different defect categories. However, the type of technical exams and their frequency of follow-up may vary largely between clinicians and centres. We aimed to present an overview of available diagnostic modalities and describe current surveillance practices by cardiologists taking care of adults with CHD (ACHD). METHODS AND RESULTS A questionnaire was used to assess the frequency cardiologists treating ACHD for at least one year administrated the most common diagnostic tests for ACHD. The most frequently employed diagnostic modalities were ECG and echocardiography for both mild and moderate/severe CHD. Sixty-seven percent of respondents reported that they routinely address psychosocial well-being. CONCLUSION Differences exist between reported current clinical practice and published guidelines. This is particularly true for the care of patients with mild lesions. In addition, some differences exist between ESC and American guidelines, with more frequent surveillance suggested by the Americans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolien W Roos-Hesselink
- Department of Adult Congenital Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam 3000 CA, The Netherlands.
| | - Chiara Pelosi
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margarita Brida
- Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Medical Faculty, University of Rijeka, Croatia; Adult Congenital Heart Centre and National Centre for Pulmonary Hypertension, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Guys & St Thomas's NHS Trust, London, UK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Julie De Backer
- Department of Cardiology and Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Sabine Ernst
- Adult Congenital Heart Centre and National Centre for Pulmonary Hypertension, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Guys & St Thomas's NHS Trust, London, UK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Werner Budts
- Department Cardiovascular Sciences (KU Leuven), Congenital and Structural Cardiology (CSC UZ Leuven), Herestraat 49, Leuven B-3000, Belgium
| | - Helmut Baumgartner
- Department of Cardiology III - Adult Congenital and Valvular Heart Disease, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, Muenster, Germany
| | - Erwin Oechslin
- Toronto Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, University Health Network, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Tobler
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Giovanni Di Salvo
- Adult Congenital Heart Centre and National Centre for Pulmonary Hypertension, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Guys & St Thomas's NHS Trust, London, UK; Paediatric Cardiology and CHD, University Hospital of Padua, Italy
| | - Jolanda Kluin
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael A Gatzoulis
- Adult Congenital Heart Centre and National Centre for Pulmonary Hypertension, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Guys & St Thomas's NHS Trust, London, UK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK; Aristotle University Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Gerhard P Diller
- Adult Congenital Heart Centre and National Centre for Pulmonary Hypertension, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Guys & St Thomas's NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Cardiology III - Adult Congenital and Valvular Heart Disease, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, Muenster, Germany; School of Cardiovascular Medicine & Sciences, Kings College, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Braund TA, Baker STE, Subotic-Kerry M, Tillman G, Evans NJ, Mackinnon A, Christensen H, O'Dea B. Potential mental health-related harms associated with the universal screening of anxiety and depressive symptoms in Australian secondary schools. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2024; 18:46. [PMID: 38566202 PMCID: PMC10985850 DOI: 10.1186/s13034-024-00734-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anxiety and depressive disorders typically emerge in adolescence and can be chronic and disabling if not identified and treated early. School-based universal mental health screening may identify young people in need of mental health support and facilitate access to treatment. However, few studies have assessed the potential harms of this approach. This paper examines some of the potential mental health-related harms associated with the universal screening of anxiety and depression administered in Australian secondary schools. METHODS A total of 1802 adolescent students from 22 secondary schools in New South Wales, Australia, were cluster randomised (at the school level) to receive either an intensive screening procedure (intervention) or a light touch screening procedure (control). Participants in the intensive screening condition received supervised self-report web-based screening questionnaires for anxiety, depression and suicidality with the follow-up care matched to their symptom severity. Participants in the light touch condition received unsupervised web-based screening for anxiety and depression only, followed by generalised advice on help-seeking. No other care was provided in this condition. Study outcomes included the increased risk of anxiety, depression, psychological distress, decreased risk of help-seeking, increased risk of mental health stigma, determined from measures assessed at baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline, and 12 weeks post-baseline. Differences between groups were analysed using mixed effect models. RESULTS Participants in the intensive screening group were not adversely affected when compared to the light touch screening condition across a range of potential harms. Rather, participants in the intensive screening group were found to have a decreased risk of inhibited help-seeking behaviour compared to the light touch screening condition. CONCLUSIONS The intensive screening procedure did not appear to adversely impact adolescents' mental health relative to the light touch procedure. Future studies should examine other school-based approaches that may be more effective and efficient than universal screening for reducing mental health burden among students. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001539224) https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=375821 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor A Braund
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | | | - Mirjana Subotic-Kerry
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Gabriel Tillman
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - Nathan J Evans
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Andrew Mackinnon
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Helen Christensen
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bridianne O'Dea
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Limenih G, MacDougall A, Wedlake M, Nouvet E. Depression and Global Mental Health in the Global South: A Critical Analysis of Policy and Discourse. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH SERVICES 2024; 54:95-107. [PMID: 38105446 PMCID: PMC10955781 DOI: 10.1177/27551938231220230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Over the past two decades, depression has become a prominent global public health concern, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Movement for Global Mental Health have developed international guidelines to improve mental health services globally, prioritizing LMICs. These efforts hold promise for advancing care and treatment for depression and other mental, neurological, and substance abuse disorders in LMICs. The intervention guides, such as the WHO's mhGAP-Intervention Guides, are evidence-based tools and guidelines to help detect, diagnose, and manage the most common mental disorders. Using the Global South as an empirical site, this article draws on Foucauldian critical discourse and document analysis methods to explore how these international intervention guides operate as part of knowledge-power processes that inscribe and materialize in the world in some forms rather than others. It is proposed that these international guidelines shape the global discourse about depression through their (re)production of biopolitical assumptions and impacts, governmentality, and "conditions of possibility." The article uses empirical data to show nuance, complexity, and multi-dimensionality where binary thinking sometimes dominates, and to make links across arguments for and against global mental health. The article concludes by identifying several resistive discourses and suggesting reconceptualizing the treatment gap for common mental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gojjam Limenih
- School of Health Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Arlene MacDougall
- Department of Pyschiatry, Western University Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, ON, Canada
| | - Marnie Wedlake
- School of Health Studies, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Elysee Nouvet
- School of Health Studies, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beck A, Dryburgh N, Bennett A, Shaver N, Esmaeilisaraji L, Skidmore B, Patten S, Bragg H, Colman I, Goldfield GS, Nicholls SG, Pajer K, Meeder R, Vasa P, Shea BJ, Brouwers M, Little J, Moher D. Screening for depression in children and adolescents in primary care or non-mental health settings: a systematic review update. Syst Rev 2024; 13:48. [PMID: 38291528 PMCID: PMC10829174 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02447-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The transition from childhood to adolescence is associated with an increase in rates of some psychiatric disorders, including major depressive disorder, a debilitating mood disorder. The aim of this systematic review is to update the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for depression in primary care and non-mental health clinic settings among children and adolescents. METHODS This review is an update of a previous systematic review, for which the last search was conducted in 2017. We searched Ovid MEDLINE® ALL, Embase Classic+Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL on November 4, 2019, and updated on February 19, 2021. If no randomized controlled trials were found, we planned to conduct an additional search for non-randomized trials with a comparator group. For non-randomized trials, we applied a non-randomized controlled trial filter and searched the same databases except for Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 2015 to February 2021. We also conducted a targeted search of the gray literature for unpublished documents. Title and abstract, and full-text screening were completed independently by pairs of reviewers. RESULTS In this review update, we were unable to find any randomized controlled studies that satisfied our eligibility criteria and evaluated the potential benefits and harms of screening for depression in children and adolescents. Additionally, a search for non-randomized trials yielded no studies that met the inclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this review indicate a lack of available evidence regarding the potential benefits and harms of screening for depression in children and adolescents. This absence of evidence emphasizes the necessity for well-conducted clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of depression screening among children and adolescents in primary care and non-mental health clinic settings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020150373 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Beck
- Knowledge Synthesis and Application Unit, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Knowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicole Dryburgh
- Knowledge Synthesis and Application Unit, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Alexandria Bennett
- Knowledge Synthesis and Application Unit, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Nicole Shaver
- Knowledge Synthesis and Application Unit, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leila Esmaeilisaraji
- Knowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Becky Skidmore
- Independent Information Specialist, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scott Patten
- Department of Community Health Services and Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Heather Bragg
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Out-Patient Mental Health, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ian Colman
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gary S Goldfield
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kathleen Pajer
- Department of Psychiatry, uOttawa Faculty of Medicine Ottawa, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert Meeder
- Department of Pediatrics, Orillia Soldiers Memorial Hospital, Orillia, Ontario, Canada
| | - Priya Vasa
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beverley J Shea
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melissa Brouwers
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julian Little
- Knowledge Synthesis and Application Unit, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Moher
- Knowledge Synthesis and Application Unit, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cosgrove L, Patterson EH, Bursztajn HJ. Industry influence on mental health research: depression as a case example. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 10:1320304. [PMID: 38322498 PMCID: PMC10845136 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1320304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Emotional distress has been rising since before the COVID-19 pandemic and the public is told that depression is a major public health problem. For example, in 2017 depressive disorders were ranked as the third leading cause of "years lost to disability" and the World Health Organization now ranks depression as the single largest contributor to global disability. Although critical appraisals of the epidemiological data raise questions about the accuracy of population-based depression estimates, the dominance of the medical model and the marketing of psychotropics as "magic bullets," have contributed to a dramatic rise in the prescription of psychiatric drugs. Unfortunately, the pharmaceutical industry's influence on psychiatric research and practice has resulted in over-estimates of the effectiveness of psychotropic medications and an under-reporting of harms. This is because the principles that govern commercial entities are incongruent with the principles that guide public health research and interventions. In order to conduct mental health research and develop interventions that are in the public's best interest, we need non-reductionist epistemological and empirical approaches that incorporate a biopsychosocial perspective. Taking depression as a case example, we argue that the socio-political factors associated with emotional distress must be identified and addressed. We describe the harms of industry influence on mental health research and show how the emphasis on "scaling up" the diagnosis and treatment of depression is an insufficient response from a public health perspective. Solutions for reform are offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Cosgrove
- Department of Counseling & School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Elissa H. Patterson
- Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beck A, LeBlanc JC, Morissette K, Hamel C, Skidmore B, Colquhoun H, Lang E, Moore A, Riva JJ, Thombs BD, Patten S, Bragg H, Colman I, Goldfield GS, Nicholls SG, Pajer K, Potter BK, Meeder R, Vasa P, Hutton B, Shea BJ, Graham E, Little J, Moher D, Stevens A. Screening for depression in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review update. Syst Rev 2021; 10:24. [PMID: 33436094 PMCID: PMC7802305 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01568-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major depressive disorder is common, debilitating, and affects feelings, thoughts, mood, and behaviors. Childhood and adolescence are critical periods for the development of depression and adolescence is marked by an increased incidence of mental health disorders. This protocol outlines the planned scope and methods for a systematic review update that will evaluate the benefits and harms of screening for depression in children and adolescents. METHODS This review will update a previously published systematic review by Roseman and colleagues. Eligible studies are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing formal screening in primary care to identify children or adolescents not already self-reporting symptoms of, diagnosed with, or treated for depression. If no or only a single RCT is available, we will consider controlled studies without random assignment. Studies of participants with characteristics associated with an elevated risk of depression will be analyzed separately. Outcomes of interest are symptoms of depression, classification of major depressive disorder based on a validated diagnostic interview, suicidality, health-related quality of life, social function, impact on lifestyle behavior (e.g., substance use, school performance, lost time at work, or school), false-positive results, overdiagnosis, overtreatment, labeling, and other harms such as those arising from treatment. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature sources. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts using the liberal accelerated method. Full-text screening will be performed independently by two reviewers using pre-specified eligibility criteria. Data extraction and risk of bias assessments will be performed independently by two reviewers. Pre-planned analyses, including subgroup and sensitivity analyses, are detailed within this protocol. Two independent reviewers will assess and finalize through consensus the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and prepare GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables for each outcome of interest. DISCUSSION The systematic review will provide a current state of the evidence of benefits and harms of depression screening in children and adolescents. These findings will be used by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care to inform the development of recommendations on depression screening. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020150373.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Beck
- Knowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Centre for Practice-Changing Research, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6 Canada
| | - John C. LeBlanc
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada
| | | | - Candyce Hamel
- Knowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Centre for Practice-Changing Research, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6 Canada
| | - Becky Skidmore
- Knowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Centre for Practice-Changing Research, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6 Canada
| | - Heather Colquhoun
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Eddy Lang
- University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Ainsley Moore
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, ON Canada
| | - John J. Riva
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, ON Canada
| | - Brett D. Thombs
- Lady Davis Institute of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Scott Patten
- Department of Community Health Services and Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Heather Bragg
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Ian Colman
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Gary S. Goldfield
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | | | - Kathleen Pajer
- Department of Psychiatry, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Beth K. Potter
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Robert Meeder
- Waypoint Centre For Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, ON Canada
| | - Priya Vasa
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Knowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Centre for Practice-Changing Research, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6 Canada
| | - Beverley J. Shea
- Knowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Centre for Practice-Changing Research, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6 Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Eva Graham
- Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Julian Little
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - David Moher
- Knowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Centre for Practice-Changing Research, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6 Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Adrienne Stevens
- Knowledge Synthesis Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Centre for Practice-Changing Research, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kovacs AH, Bellinger DC. Neurocognitive and psychosocial outcomes in adult congenital heart disease: a lifespan approach. Heart 2020; 107:159-167. [PMID: 32887738 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Adrienne H Kovacs
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - David C Bellinger
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cosgrove L, Morrill Z, Yusif M, Vaswani A, Cathcart S, Troeger R, Karter JM. Drivers of and Solutions for the Overuse of Antidepressant Medication in Pediatric Populations. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11:17. [PMID: 32116838 PMCID: PMC7034322 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Children in the United States and internationally are increasingly being diagnosed with depression and related psychiatric conditions and a recent study found that antidepressant (ADM) use in children and adolescents rose substantially in youth cohorts in five Western countries from 2005 to 2012. However, there has been ongoing controversy over the effectiveness and safety of ADM use in children, including concerns about ADM increasing suicidality and self-harm. In addition to the increase in the diagnosis of depression, commercially driven off-label prescriptions have been cited as a significant reason for high rates of pediatric ADM prescribing. In this commentary, we discuss two drivers of the overuse of ADM, both of which are products of an increasingly medicalized approach to mental health: 1) the demand for mental health and depression screening in youth, despite the lack of evidence to support it, and 2) the renewed momentum of the Global Mental Health Movement and concomitant calls to "scale up" the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness. Using the lens of institutional corruption, we identify the ways in which both guild and financial conflicts of interest create obstacles to rational prescribing practices in pediatric populations and offer suggestions for reform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Justin M. Karter
- Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cosgrove L, Karter JM. The poison in the cure: Neoliberalism and contemporary movements in mental health. THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/0959354318796307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Neoliberalism reaches beyond economic policy and material conditions and reformulates the subject and psychological life and therefore is best understood as an attitude toward science, knowledge making, and subjectivity. In a neoliberal climate, markets give us truth and individuals are encouraged to be self-concerned agents rather than members of a polis. Thus, at the very moment that neoliberal policies transfer responsibility to individuals, there is a simultaneous increase in surveillance in order to reinstall certain patterns of human behavior. Mental health research and practice risk becoming commodities dedicated to enforcing this logic. In this article, we explore medical neoliberalism in some of its recent manifestations: global mental health interventions, routine depression screening, and the monitoring of social media to assess mental health. We also consider the ways in which popular reforms in the mental health field are founded on neoliberal assumptions and may be abetting these ideological aims.
Collapse
|