Barriers to use of semen analysis in the adolescent with a varicocele: Survey of patient, parental, and practitioner attitudes

Size matters: Total testicular volume predicts sperm count in Tanner V varicocele patients

INTRODUCTION

It is known the prevalence of varicoceles in adolescent men is 14-29% but there is debate surrounding implications on fertility. As obtaining a semen analysis (SA) may be challenging, there is need for objective tests as measures of fecundity. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between testicular volume differential (TVD), varicocele grade, and total testicular volume (TTV) on seminal parameters including total motile sperm count (TMSC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-center chart review over 14 years of 486 Tanner V adolescent males. Three hundred and four met inclusion of palpable, non-operated left-sided varicocele who underwent at least one SA and ultrasound. Abnormal TMSC was defined by World Health Organization 2010 criteria for minimal reference ranges. Multivariate logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic analysis with Youden J-statistic and descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

Three hundred and four Tanner V adolescents with median age of 18.0 years (18.0-19.0), median TTV of 34.5 cc (28.9, 40.2) and median TMSC of 62.5 million/ejaculate (25.4, 123.4) were evaluated. TTV cutoff of 29.5 cc was found to predict TMSC of <9 million/ejaculate with negative predictive value of 96.2% and odds ratio of 6.08 ([2.13-17.42], p < 0.001). TVD greater than 20% did not reach statistical significance with an odds ratio of 1.66 ([0.41-6.62], p = 0.50).

DISCUSSION

In clinical practice, each patient will need to have an individualized plan. Based on our data, for older adolescents (17 or 18 years) with varicocele and an abnormal TTV, clinicians may have a lower threshold for advising SA, and if unable to obtain, surgical intervention and/or closer surveillance should be stressed. Patients should be informed of their six-fold increase in abnormal SA. Patients with normal TTV should be advised they are at lower risk of having abnormal SA. Younger patients with varicocele and an initial TVD>20%, should be followed closely but intervention delayed until 17 or 18 to better assess TTV. The importance of trending patient data should be emphasized as a single measurement has low predictive value for developing adolescents. Limitations of our study include a retrospective design and the lack of uniform correlation between adolescent SA and paternity.

CONCLUSIONS

Total testicular volume less than 29.5 cc increased odds of abnormal semen analysis by over six times and had a negative predictive value of 96.2%. Ultrasound results may be useful for risk stratification and counselling on appropriateness of surgical intervention.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of internal spermatic artery ligation during laparoscopic varicocelectomy in children and adolescents: Is it safe?

INTRODUCTION

Challenges in identifying small testicular arteries and lack of microscopic experience have led to a rising trend in the use of laparoscopic technique for pediatric and adolescent varicocele. The controversy over artery ligation (AL) and artery preservation (AP) during laparoscopic varicocelectomy (LV) is still debatable. This study investigates the effectiveness of AL and AP during LV in pediatric and adolescent varicocele cases.

METHODS

The systematic searches based on PRISMA guideline were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and ProQuest databases with pre-defined keywords. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed to assess catch-up growth, persistence, recurrence, hydrocele, operative time, post-operative testicular volume, and sperm analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1512 patients from 9 eligible studies were included. There were no significant differences in catch up growth (OR 0.89; 95%CI 0.53, 1.51; p = 0.68) or hydrocele incidence (OR 0.59; 95%CI 0.28, 1.24; p = 0.16). The recurrence rate and persistence rate in AP group is significantly higher compared to AL group (OR 2.95; 95%CI 1.53, 5.68; p = 0.001 and OR 5.13; 95% CI 2.04, 12.88; p = 0.0005, respectively). The mean operative time during laparoscopic varicocelectomy is significantly longer when arteries are preserved as opposed to when they are ligated (OR 5.33; 95%CI 2.05, 8.60; p = 0.001). AL and AP both improved testicular volume and post-operative sperm analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

AL showed higher efficacy and comparable safety to AP. We recommend using AL with lymphatic sparing to minimize hydrocele complications.

Does Varicocele Treatment in Adolescence Improve Fertility Outcomes in Adulthood?

Many questions on diagnosis of varicocele in adolescent patients have yet to be adequately answered, particularly regarding paternity outcomes after treated in comparison to conservative monitoring. There have been some promising outcomes after surgical treatment, particularly microsurgical varicocelectomy, but the results are mixed and may not be comparable because of differing variables. Future studies with robust methodologies are needed to identify which adolescents require treatment and when treatment should be initiated to avoid any detrimental effects on future fertility.

Risk factors on testicular function in adolescents

PURPOSE

Adolescence represents an important window for gonadal development. The aim of this review is to carry out a critical excursus of the most recent literature on endogenous and exogenous risk factors related to testicular function, focusing the research on adolescence period.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search within PubMed was performed to provide a summary of currently available evidence regarding the impact on adolescence of varicocele, cryptorchidism, cancer, diabetes, lifestyle factors, endocrine disruptors, obesity and sexually transmitted diseases. We focused on human studies that evaluated a possible impact of these factors on puberty timing and their effects on andrological health.

RESULTS

Evidence collected seems to suggest that andrological health in adolescence may be impaired by several factors, as varicocele, cryptorchidism, and childhood cancer. Despite an early diagnosis and treatment, many adolescents might still have symptoms and sign of a testicular dysfunction in their adult life and at the current time it is not possible to predict which of them will experience andrological problems. Lifestyle factors might have a role in these discrepancies. Most studies point out towards a correlation between obesity, insulin resistance, alcohol, smoking, use of illegal drugs and testicular function in pubertal boys. Also, endocrine disruptors and sexually transmitted diseases might contribute to impair reproductive health, but more studies in adolescents are needed.

CONCLUSION

According to currently available evidence, there is an emerging global adverse trend of high-risk and unhealthy behaviors in male adolescents. A significant proportion of young men with unsuspected and undiagnosed andrological disorders engage in behaviors that could impair testicular development and function, with an increased risk for later male infertility and/or hypogonadism during the adult life. Therefore, adolescence should be considered a key time for intervention and prevention of later andrological diseases.

Peak retrograde flow a potential objective management tool to identify young adults with varicocele 'at risk' for a high sperm DNA fragmentation

INTRODUCTION

Determining which patients are negatively affected by varicocele would enable clinicians to better select those men who would benefit most from surgery. Since conventional semen parameters, have been limited in their ability to evaluate the negative effects of varicocele on fertility, specialized laboratory tests have emerged.

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinical and ultrasound parameters (including PRF) which would negatively influence standard and functional semen variables in young adults with a varicocele.

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional observational study.

SETTING

Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium.

PATIENT(S)

Young volunteers between 16 and 26 years, Tanner 5, were recruited.

INTERVENTION(S)

Every participant had a scrotal ultrasound to calculate testicular volumes. If a varicocele was present, the grade, vein diameter, peak retrograde flow (PRF) in supine position and spontaneous reflux in standing position were measured. All participants provided a semen sample. Standard semen parameters were analyzed and sperm DNA fragmentation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Of all clinical and ultrasound parameters tested, PRF was an objective tool identifying young adults with a varicocele. PRF was highlighted by the prevalence of SDF, both in the total and vital fractions of the spermatozoa, providing opportunities to manage such 'at-risk' adolescents/young adults.

RESULT(S)

Total SDF was significantly increased in grade 3 varicocele compared to grade 1 and 2 but no significant difference with vital SDF or standard descriptive semen parameters was seen. Total and vital SDF on the other hand were significantly increased when PRF was above 38.4 cm/s. Standard semen analysis showed no difference with PRF as an independent predictor. Testicular atrophy index, varicocele vein diameter and spontaneous reflux revealed no significant differences in both the descriptive and functional semen variables.

DISCUSSION

Descriptive semen parameters showed no significant difference between the non-varicocele controls and the varicocele group with low and high PRF. Increased PRF negatively influenced sperm quality via increased DNA fragmentation both in the total as in the vital fractions of the semen.

CONCLUSION(S)

Of all clinical and ultrasound parameters tested, PRF was an objective non-invasive tool to identify varicocele patients at risk for a high SDF.

Management and Treatment of Varicocele in Children and Adolescents: An Endocrinologic Perspective

Pediatric varicocele has an overall prevalence of 15%, being more frequent as puberty begins. It can damage testicular function, interfering with Sertoli cell proliferation and hormone secretion, testicular growth and spermatogenesis. Proper management has a pivotal role for future fertility preservation. The aim of this review was to discuss the diagnosis, management and treatment of childhood and adolescent varicocele from an endocrinologic perspective, illustrating the current evidence of the European Society of Pediatric Urology (ESPU), the European Association of Urology (EAU), the American Urological Association (AUA) and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) scientific societies. According to the ASRM/ESPU/AUA practice committee, the treatment of adolescent varicocele is indicated in the case of decreased testicular volume or sperm abnormalities, while it is contraindicated in subclinical varicocele. The recent EAS/ESPU meta-analysis reports that moderate evidence exists on the benefits of varicocele treatment in children and adolescents in terms of testicular volume and sperm concentration increase. No specific phenotype in terms of testicular volume cut-off or peak retrograde flow (PRF) is indicated. Based on current evidence, we suggest that conservative management may be suggested in patients with PRF < 30 cm/s, testicular asymmetry < 10% and no evidence of sperm and hormonal abnormalities. In patients with 10-20% testicular volume asymmetry or 30 < PRF ≤ 38 cm/s or sperm abnormalities, careful follow-up may ensue. In the case of absent catch-up growth or sperm recovery, varicocele repair should be suggested. Finally, treatment can be proposed at the initial consultation in painful varicocele, testicular volume asymmetry ≥ 20%, PRF > 38 cm/s, infertility and failure of testicular development.

Distribution of Semen Parameters Among Adolescent Males Undergoing Fertility Preservation in a Multicenter International Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To determine the distribution of semen parameters among adolescent and adult males presenting for fertility preservation.

METHODS

A retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study of adolescent males age 11-19 who underwent semen analysis for fertility preservation at 3 centers in 2 countries with a comparison cohort of adult men presenting for fertility preservation. Prevalence of azoospermia and distribution of semen parameters was compared across groups.

RESULTS

A total of 197 adolescents and 95 adults underwent semen analysis for fertility preservation. Azoospermia was present in 17 (8.6%) adolescents and 3 (3.2%) adults. There was decline in the prevalence of azoospermia with increasing age. After exclusion of patients with azoospermia, the adolescent and adult cohorts were comprised of 180 and 92 patients, respectively. Median age at presentation among adolescents vs adults was 16.5years (interquartile range [IQR] 15.2-17.6) and 30.8years (IQR 22.7-43.8), respectively. Median semen volume was 1.0mL (IQR 0.5-2.0) vs 2.5mL (IQR 1.5-3.5), P <.001. Median sperm concentration was 30million/mL (IQR 10-57) vs 39million/mL (IQR 14-57), P = .2. Median sperm motility was 39% (IQR 20-55) vs 45% (IQR 35-55), P = .01. Median total motile sperm count was 11million (IQR 1.4-33) for adolescents vs 29million (IQR 13-69) for adults, P <.001.

CONCLUSION

Young adolescent males had higher prevalence of azoospermia and lower semen parameters compared to adults. In conjunction with physical examination, Tanner stage, and specific clinical context, these data can help to inform patients and their families about potential for fertility preservation, even in very young adolescent patients.

Fertility Issues in Pediatric Urology

Improved understanding of the pathogenesis and natural history of many urologic disorders, as well as advances in fertility preservation techniques, has increased the awareness of and options for management of fertility threats in pediatric patients. In children, fertility may be altered by oncologic conditions, by differences in sexual differentiation, by gonadotoxic drugs and other side effects of treatment for nonurologic disorders, and by urologic conditions, such as varicocele and cryptorchidism. Although fertility concerns are best addressed in a multidisciplinary setting, pediatric urologists should be aware of the underlying pathophysiology and management options to properly counsel and advocate for patients.

Does total testicular volume predict testicular volume difference in adolescent males with varicocele?

Introduction:

We evaluated the relationship between total testicular volume (TTV) and testicular volume differential (TVD) in adolescent males with varicocele. Both low TTV and high TVD have been independently associated with higher incidences of infertility later in life, but a predictive relationship between TTV and TVD directly has yet to be described.

Materials and Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed a database of Tanner 5 boys ages 16-21 who presented with varicocele at a single institution between 2009 and 2017. All patients had a scrotal sonogram prior to surgical intervention. TTV and TVD were calculated for each individual and four non-exclusive groupings of patients were created for statistical analysis. We chose 30 cc as a cut off value for low TTV based on prior studies.

Results:

209 patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 18.3 years (16–21, SD 1.7) with a mean total testicular volume of 36 cc (13.5-78.2, SD 11.1). Cut off points of TVD of 20% and TTV of 30 cc were used to separate patients. There were 65 boys (31%) with TTV < 30 cc and 58 boys (28%) with TVD ≥ 20%. Among males with TTV < 30 cc, 23 (35%) had a TVD ≥ 20%. Among males with TTV ≥ 30 cc, 35 (24%) had a TVD ≥ 20%. The relationship between TVD and TTV was found to be non-significant (p > 0.05).

Discussion:

Adolescent varicoceles continue to pose a challenge to pediatric urologists. The dilemma of over-aggressive treatment has proven difficult to balance with the risk of infertility. We hoped that elucidating the relationship between TTV and TVD could be useful in identifying patients who are at greater risk for infertility while decreasing the need for more intrusive testing, such as semen analysis, in an adolescent population. We looked at the direct relationship between low TTV and high TVD. In our population, there was a non-significant relationship between TTV < 30 cc and TVD ≥ 20% (p > 0.05) indicating that in adolescents with varicocele, TTV and TVD are independent variables. Our study limitations include the inherent user dependent bias of ultrasound measurements and data collection at a single institution with high ethnic diversity, possibly not comparable to all patient populations.

Conclusions:

Low TTV (< 30 cc) itself is not predictive of high TVD (≥ 20%) in adolescent boys with varicocele, despite their reported independent associations with impaired fertility in other studies.

Best practice in the diagnosis and treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents

A varicocele is an abnormal dilation of the pampiniform plexus of veins in the scrotum which begins at puberty in approximately 15% of males. Although common in the general population and often asymptomatic, varicoceles are associated with gonadal dysfunction including testicular atrophy, infertility, and hypogonadism in a subset of men diagnosed later in life. Because of the high prevalence and uncertain pathogenesis, definitive management guidelines for varicoceles diagnosed in the pediatric and adolescent population remain poorly defined. The varicocele is the most common etiology of male factor infertility, and treatment in the pediatric and adolescent population may improve semen quality and improve fecundity in adulthood. Evaluation of the pediatric and adolescent varicocele should include history, physical exam, and measurement of testicular volume with orchidometer or ultrasound. Testicular volume differentials and peak retrograde flow on Doppler ultrasonography are important factors in risk stratification of the pediatric varicocele population. Semen analysis and reproductive endocrine assessment should also be considered as part of the workup for adolescent patients. A variety of treatment approaches exist for varicocele, and while the microsurgical subinguinal approach is the gold standard for the adult population, it has yet to be confirmed as superior for the adolescent population. Referral to an andrologist for the adolescent patient with varicocele should be considered in equivocal cases. While active treatment of varicocele in the pediatric and adolescent population is controversial, it is clear that some untreated patients will suffer symptoms later in life, while overtreatment remains a concern for this large, vulnerable population. Therefore, surveillance strategies and improved accuracy in diagnosis of clinically important pediatric varicoceles prompting treatment are needed in the future.

Varicocele

N/A

The Dilemma of Adolescent Varicoceles: Do They Really Have to Be Repaired?

The primary indication for varicocele repair in adults, that of failed paternity, must be substituted in the adolescent population with surrogate parameters of testicular size differential and semen analysis. Making recommendations based on these two parameters is incredibly difficult because studies often have contradictory findings, different patient populations, and lack of long-term follow up of the key endpoint, paternity. Therefore, it is not a surprise that recommendations for adolescent varicocele repair are general (with some exceptions) and necessarily so because of limitations in quality of evidence. Apart from pain, all indications for varicocele repair in adolescence remain controversial. This highlights the most important task for future studies: to prevent pediatric urologists from allowing a potentially damaging process to go untreated, while at the same time avoiding unnecessary intervention on a highly prevalent condition.

The natural history of semen parameters in untreated asymptomatic adolescent varicocele patients: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Adolescent males with varicoceles present a dilemma for surveillance and treatment. Testicular volumetrics have not been shown to predict SA outcomes. Serial SAs are thus recommended in asymptomatic adolescent males with varicoceles and normal testicular development, but the natural history of semen parameters is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the natural history of semen parameters in adolescent boys with a left varicocele under active surveillance.

STUDY DESIGN

Adolescents with an asymptomatic unilateral left varicocele, Tanner V development, normal testicular volumes, and an initial SA were retrospectively reviewed in a single-institution prospectively followed cohort. Total motile count (TMC) was calculated. A cutoff of TMC Z 20 million was used to dichotomize SA results into "normal" or "poor." Those with poor SA were offered repeat SA. Cumulative probabilities of normal TMC over successive rounds of SA were calculated. Bivariate models were used to explore associations of a second consecutive poor TMC with age and varicocele grade.

RESULTS

A total of 216 patients provided an initial SA between 1992 and 2015. We excluded 17 for a history of cryptorchidism or incomplete SA data for a final cohort of 199 patients with median follow-up of 3.3 years (interquartile range 1.5-5.6 years). The mean age at initial SA was 17.9 years (range 14.8-21.8 years). One hundred and nine out of 199 had an initial normal TMC. Of the 90 out of 199 with an initially poor TMC, 51 had repeat SA and 24 of the 51 patients improved to normal TMC. Of the 27 patients with two consecutive poor TMCs, 15 had a third SA and five out of 15 improved to normal TMC. Thus, cumulatively, 55%, 67%, and 69% of all patients had a normal TMC after an initial, second, and third SA, respectively. However, fewer patients in each round of SA normalized their TMC (Figure). Neither age nor varicocele grade was associated with a second consecutive poor TMC.

DISCUSSION

Two-thirds of Tanner V boys with an uncorrected varicocele and normal testicular volumes achieve a normal TMC regardless of varicocele grade or age. Despite Tanner V development, 47% with an initial "poor" SA will improve to normal status without surgery. However, a small subgroup of patients will have persistently poor TMC and thus should be targeted in future research for timely intervention.

CONCLUSION

Semen parameters improve over time. SA should be followed and repeated at least once in symptomatic Tanner V boys with varicoceles.

Does varicocelectomy improve semen analysis outcomes in adolescents without testicular asymmetry?

PURPOSE

The main indications for adolescent varicocelectomy are testicular hypotrophy or pain. However, we have previously shown that both serial total testicular volume and volume differential are weakly associated with semen quality. The ultimate patient goal is paternity, but semen analysis is critical to appropriate management of varicocele. We hypothesize that varicocelectomy improves total motile count (TMC) among patients who only have abnormal semen analysis (SA) parameters, but not among those with potential hormonal dysfunction such as Klinefelter syndrome or cryptorchidism.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our registry of adolescent males followed with a clinical left varicocele. For this study, subjects without sustained testicular asymmetry, who were Tanner V, and gave at least one preoperative SA were included. Subjects were excluded if they had embolization for their varicocele or no postoperative SA. Primary outcome was change in TMC before and after surgery, compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test after stratifying by surgical indication. Secondary outcomes included rates of improved TMC and normalized TMC (>20 million) after surgery, compared across covariates using the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients met the eligibility criteria, 11 of whom underwent repair for only abnormal preoperative TMC. Overall, median age (interquartile range [IQR]) at first preoperative SA was 17.6 (15.9-17.9) years. The median preoperative TMC across all SA was 2.8 (0.7-7.4) million. The median age at surgery was 18.2 (16.8-18.9) years. Postoperatively, the median TMC across all SA increased to 18.2 (3.6-18.2) million (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p < 0.01; see Figure). The improvement in TMC occurred primarily in the group who only had abnormal preoperative TMC (82% improved, 55% normalized); lack of improvement was seen in patients who had a history of Klinefelter or orchiopexy for cryptorchidism.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescent varicocele patients should undergo SA after development of Tanner V. Varicocelectomy has a high success rate for improving TMC in adolescent or young adult males who only have abnormal TMC and no history of cryptorchidism.

The Varicocele: Clinical Presentation, Evaluation, and Surgical Management

A varicocele is an abnormal dilatation and tortuosity of the veins of the spermatic cord. Although varicoceles are common in the general population and are frequently found on routine physical examinations, they represent the most common correctable cause of male factor infertility. Varicoceles are also often incidental findings on imaging studies, particularly scrotal ultrasound. Importantly, not all varicoceles should be treated equally (or at all), and basic guidelines on the evaluation and indications for treatment of adult varicoceles should be reviewed before counseling and treatment. A semen analysis should be obtained for any male patient of reproductive age considering intervention. The adolescent varicocele is managed much differently than the adult varicocele and remains a source of controversy. This review describes the clinical presentation and the evaluation of adult and pediatric varicoceles, and provides guidance on their diagnosis and workup. It also describes options for surgical repair and the success and complication rates associated with each surgical approach, ultimately supporting microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair as the current surgical standard.

Transitional Urology for Male Adolescents: What Adult Urologists Should Know

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in transitional urology, or how to best prepare patients with major congenital urologic diseases, such as bladder exstrophy and neuropathic bladder, to manage their own health care with adult urologists. However, common pediatric urologic conditions may be encountered by the adult urologist with more regularity. This review focuses on three relatively common conditions which may be identified in childhood, the consequences from which a patient may seek help from an adult urologist: cryptorchidism, varicocele, and Klinefelter syndrome.