Linkage to Primary Care for Persons First Receiving Injectable Naltrexone During Inpatient Opioid Detoxification

Integration of a Community Opioid Treatment Program Into a Federally Qualified Health Center

OBJECTIVES

With the increasing rates of opioid overdose deaths in the United States, barriers to treatment access for patients seeking medications for opioid use disorder (OUD), and challenges of initiating buprenorphine in patients who use fentanyl, it is essential to explore novel approaches to expanding access to methadone treatment. An opioid treatment program (OTP) and a federally qualified health center (FQHC) partnered to develop and implement an innovative integrated methadone and primary care treatment model. The process for integrating an OTP and FQHC to provide methadone treatment in the primary care setting will be discussed.

METHODS

An OTP methadone dispensing site was co-located in the FQHC, utilizing a staffing matrix built on the expertise of each stakeholder. The OTP managed DEA and state regulatory processes, whereas the FQHC physicians provided medical treatment, including methadone treatment protocols, treatment plans, and primary care. Patient demographics, medical history, and retention data for those who entered the program between January 2021 and February 2023 were collected through chart review and analyzed with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 288 OTP-FHQC patients were enrolled during the study. Retention rates in methadone treatment at 90 and 180 days were similar to partner clinics.

CONCLUSIONS

Collaboration between FQHCs and OTPs is operationally feasible and can be achieved utilizing the current staffing model of the FQHC and OTP. This model can increase access to treatment for OUD and primary care for an urban, underserved patient population.

Innovating for real-world care: A systematic review of interventions to improve post-detoxification outcomes for opioid use disorder

BACKGROUND

Inpatient detoxification is a common health care entry point for people with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD). However, many patients return to opioid use after discharge and also do not access OUD treatment. This systematic review reports on the features and findings of research on interventions developed specifically to improve substance use outcomes and treatment linkage after inpatient detoxification for OUD.

METHODS

Of 6419 articles, 64 met inclusion criteria for the current review. Articles were coded on key domains including sample characteristics, study methods and outcome measures, bias indicators, intervention type, and findings.

RESULTS

Many studies did not report sample characteristics, including demographics and co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders, which may impact postdetoxification OUD treatment outcomes and the generalizability of interventions. Slightly more than half of studies examined interventions that were primarily medical in nature, though only a third focused on initiating medication treatment beyond detoxification. Medical and combination interventions that focused on initiating medications for OUD generally performed well, as did psychological interventions with one or more reinforcement-based components.

CONCLUSIONS

Research efforts to improve post-detoxification outcomes would benefit from clearer reporting of sample characteristics that are associated with treatment and recovery outcomes, including diagnostic comorbidities. Findings also support the need to identify ways to introduce medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and other effective treatments including reinforcement-based interventions during detoxification or soon after.

Choice of extended release medication for OUD in young adults (buprenorphine or naltrexone): A pilot enhancement of the Youth Opioid Recovery Support (YORS) intervention

BACKGROUND

The Youth Opioid Recovery Support (YORS) intervention is a promising approach for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) in young adults that seeks to improve adherence to extended-release medications for OUD (XR-MOUD) and reduce opioid relapse through assertive outreach techniques. YORS was previously tested with individuals seeking extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX), but has not been tested on individuals pursuing extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP).

METHODS

This pilot study tested the YORS intervention among a group choosing either XR-MOUD compared to historical treatment as usual (H-TAU) and intervention conditions from a previous study. This study also tested feasibility of a stepped care approach using a protocol for transition to standard care. Twenty-two young adults (ages 18-26) with OUD intending to pursue outpatient treatment with XR-NTX (n = 11) or XR-BUP (n = 11) were recruited from inpatient treatment and received 12-24 weeks of the YORS intervention.

RESULTS

Participants in YORS compared to H-TAU received more outpatient doses at 12 weeks (1.91 vs. 0.40, p < .001) and 24 weeks (3.76 vs. 0.70, p < .001), had lower relapse rates at 12 weeks (36.4% vs.75.0%; p = .012) and 24 weeks(52.9% vs. 95.0%; p = .003), and had greater cumulative relapse-free survival over 24 weeks (HR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.17-6.02, p < .05). Rates of continuing MOUD in a standard care setting after the intervention ended were extremely poor. Outcomes did not differ by medication choice.

CONCLUSIONS

These results are consistent with previous findings and demonstrate feasibility and efficacy of YORS with patient choice of medication. The results highlight the need for innovative strategies to sustain positive outcomes and step-down care successfully in these vulnerable young adults.

A pilot randomized controlled trial of assertive treatment including family involvement and home delivery of medication for young adults with opioid use disorder

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although medications for opioid use disorder (OUD), including extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX), have demonstrated effectiveness, adherence is often low. We tested the preliminary efficacy of youth opioid recovery support (YORS), a multi-component intervention designed to improve engagement and medication adherence for young adults with OUD.

DESIGN

Single-site randomized controlled trial with 24-week follow-up.

SETTING

Community substance use disorder treatment program in Baltimore, MD, USA.

PARTICIPANTS

Young adults aged 18-26 years enrolled in inpatient/residential OUD treatment intending to pursue outpatient OUD treatment with XR-NTX. Twenty-one participants were randomized to YORS and 20 to treatment as usual (TAU). The analyzed sample was 65.8% male.

INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR

Components of YORS include: (1) home delivery of XR-NTX; (2) family engagement; (3) assertive outreach; and (4) contingency management for receipt of XR-NTX doses. The comparator was TAU, which consisted of a standard referral to outpatient care following an inpatient stay.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcomes were number of XR-NTX doses received over 24 weeks and relapse to opioid use (defined as ≥ 10 days of use within 28 days) at 24 weeks.

FINDINGS

Participants in the YORS condition received more XR-NTX doses [mean = 4.28; standard deviation (SD) = 2.3] compared with those in TAU (mean = 0.70; SD = 1.2), P < 0.01. Participants in the YORS group compared with TAU had lower rates of relapse (61 versus 95%; P < 0.01). Survival analyses revealed group differences on time to relapse with participants in TAU being more likely to relapse sooner compared with participants in the YORS condition [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.26-5.88, P < 0.01].

CONCLUSIONS

The youth opioid recovery support intervention for extended-release naltrexone adherence and opioid relapse prevention among young adults with opioid use disorder appeared to improve treatment and relapse outcomes compared with standard treatment.

Increasing Engagement in Post-Withdrawal Management Services Through a Practice Bundle and Checklist

Individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) who engage in post-withdrawal management (or detoxification) continuing care are more likely to remain drug free or sober and less likely to be incarcerated or die of overdose. Yet, just 21-35% of individuals receiving emergency withdrawal management services receive continuing care. This deficiency is occurring, while overdose rates are high, and limited evidence exists on how to improve this vital transition. To address this gap, withdrawal management service providers employed the LINK Care Transition Implementation System to improve withdrawal management to continuing care transition rates. This system integrates three evidence-based implementation science approaches: (a) practice bundle, (b) process checklist, and (c) standardized organizational change model. This integrated implementation approach improved withdrawal management to continuing care transition rates from 20 (baseline average) to 43% (post-intervention) in (n = 6) Wisconsin withdrawal management centers. This study provides insights into how to improve transitions to enhance SUD care and outcomes.

Extended-release injectable naltrexone for opioid use disorder: a systematic review

AIMS

To review systematically the published literature on extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX, Vivitrol^® ), marketed as a once-per-month injection product to treat opioid use disorder. We addressed the following questions: (1) how successful is induction on XR-NTX; (2) what are adherence rates to XR-NTX; and (3) does XR-NTX decrease opioid use? Factors associated with these outcomes as well as overdose rates were examined.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and used Google Scholar for forward citation searches of peer-reviewed papers from January 2006 to June 2017. Studies that included individuals seeking treatment for opioid use disorder who were offered XR-NTX were included.

RESULTS

We identified and included 34 studies. Pooled estimates showed that XR-NTX induction success was lower in studies that included individuals that required opioid detoxification [62.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 54.5-70.0%] compared with studies that included individuals already detoxified from opioids (85.0%, 95% CI = 78.0-90.1%); 44.2% (95% CI = 33.1-55.9%) of individuals took all scheduled injections of XR-NTX, which were usually six or fewer. Adherence was higher in prospective investigational studies (i.e. studies conducted in a research context according to a study protocol) compared to retrospective studies of medical records taken from routine care (6-month rates: 46.7%, 95% CI = 34.5-59.2% versus 10.5%, 95% CI = 4.6-22.4%, respectively). Compared with referral to treatment, XR-NTX reduced opioid use in adults under criminal justice supervision and when administered to inmates before release. XR-NTX reduced opioid use compared with placebo in Russian adults, but this effect was confounded by differential retention between study groups. XR-NTX showed similar efficacy to buprenorphine when randomization occurred after detoxification, but was inferior to buprenorphine when randomization occurred prior to detoxification.

CONCLUSIONS

Many individuals intending to start extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) do not and most who do start XR-NTX discontinue treatment prematurely, two factors that limit its clinical utility significantly. XR-NTX appears to decrease opioid use but there are few experimental demonstrations of this effect.

Effects of incentives for naltrexone adherence on opiate abstinence in heroin-dependent adults

AIM

To test whether an incentive-based intervention that increased adherence to naltrexone also increased opiate abstinence.

DESIGN

Post-hoc combined analysis of three earlier randomized controlled trials that showed individually that incentives for adherence to oral and to extended-release injection naltrexone dosing schedules increased naltrexone adherence, but not opiate abstinence.

SETTING

Out-patient therapeutic work-place in Baltimore, MD, USA.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and forty unemployed heroin-dependent adults participating from 2006 to 2010.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were hired in a model work-place for 26 weeks and randomized to a contingency (n = 72) or prescription (n = 68) group. Both groups were offered naltrexone. Contingency participants were required to take scheduled doses of naltrexone in order to work and earn wages. Prescription participants could earn wages independent of naltrexone adherence.

MEASURES

Thrice-weekly and monthly urine samples tested for opiates and cocaine and measures of naltrexone adherence (percentage of monthly urine samples positive for naltrexone or percentage of scheduled injections received). All analyses included pre-randomization attendance, opiate use and cocaine use as covariates. Additional analyses controlled for cocaine use and naltrexone adherence during the intervention.

FINDINGS

Contingency participants had more opiate abstinence than prescription participants (68.1 versus 52.9% opiate-negative thrice-weekly urine samples, respectively; and 71.9 versus 61.7% opiate-negative monthly urine samples, respectively) based on initial analyses [thrice-weekly samples, odds ratio (OR) = 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.7-6.5, P < 0.01; monthly samples, OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.0-7.1, P = 0.06] and on analyses that controlled for cocaine use (thrice-weekly samples, OR = 3.9, 95% CI = 3.3-4.5, P < 0.01; monthly samples, OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.1-11.1, P = 0.04), which was high and associated with opiate use. The difference in opiate abstinence rates between contingency and prescription participants was reduced when controlling for naltrexone adherence (monthly samples, OR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.7-1.7, P = 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Incentives for naltrexone adherence increase opiate abstinence in heroin-dependent adults, an effect that appears to be due to increased naltrexone adherence produced by the incentives.

Extended-release naltrexone for opioid use disorder started during or following incarceration

A western Massachusetts county jail began initiating extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) prior to release from incarceration and linking participants to community treatment providers upon release. Program barriers prevented the start of XR-NTX prior to release for a subset.

METHODS

This report consists of the initial 67 jail releasees with opioid dependence, 47 who received XR-NTX before release, and 20 after release. Utility of the program was assessed by determining medication addiction treatment (MAT) retention rates at 4, 8, and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-seven commenced XR-NTX approximately 7 days prior to release, and 20 were referred to commence XR-NTX at outpatient treatment centers. Rate of retention at week 4 was higher in group with treatment initiation prior to release as compared to those started in community: week 4: 55% (24 XR-NTX+2 agonist MAT out of 47) versus 25% (4 XR-NTX+1 agonist MAT out of 20) (p=0.03); week 8: 36% (13 XR-NTX+4 agonist) versus 25% (3 XR-NTX+2 agonist) (p=0.41); week 24: 21% (6 XR-NTX+4 agonist) versus 15% (1 XR-NTX+2 agonist) (p=0.74). Three patients died, all in the pre-release group, all from overdose at 3-5months after release and 2.5 or more months after stopping XR-NTX, compared to none of 20 in community group (p=0.55). Limitations include that cohorts were non-random and observational; substance use could not be consistently determined; and overdose deaths in MA occurred partly in clusters, limiting historical comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Receiving XR-NTX prior to jail release for opioid use disorder appears to increase the treatment retention rate as compared to commencing after release. The treatment attrition and striking rate of overdose deaths are concerning, and support expanded availability of opioid agonist treatments prior to release and other evidence-based supports and retention strategies in the community.