Vitamin D3 signaling and breast cancer: Insights from transgenic mouse models

Pleiotropy of Progesterone Receptor Membrane Component 1 in Modulation of Cytochrome P450 Activity

Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) is one of few proteins that have been recently described as direct modulators of the activity of human cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP)s. These enzymes form a superfamily of membrane-bound hemoproteins that metabolize a wide variety of physiological, dietary, environmental, and pharmacological compounds. Modulation of CYP activity impacts the detoxification of xenobiotics as well as endogenous pathways such as steroid and fatty acid metabolism, thus playing a central role in homeostasis. This review is focused on nine main topics that include the most relevant aspects of past and current PGRMC1 research, focusing on its role in CYP-mediated drug metabolism. Firstly, a general overview of the main aspects of xenobiotic metabolism is presented (I), followed by an overview of the role of the CYP enzymatic complex (IIa), a section on human disorders associated with defects in CYP enzyme complex activity (IIb), and a brief account of cytochrome b5 (cyt b5)'s effect on CYP activity (IIc). Subsequently, we present a background overview of the history of the molecular characterization of PGRMC1 (III), regarding its structure, expression, and intracellular location (IIIa), and its heme-binding capability and dimerization (IIIb). The next section reflects the different effects PGRMC1 may have on CYP activity (IV), presenting a description of studies on the direct effects on CYP activity (IVa), and a summary of pathways in which PGRMC1's involvement may indirectly affect CYP activity (IVb). The last section of the review is focused on the current challenges of research on the effect of PGRMC1 on CYP activity (V), presenting some future perspectives of research in the field (VI).

Vitamin D and potential effects on cancers: a review

Cancer is characterized by the abnormal and uncontrollable division and growth of cells that can infiltrate tissues and alter normal physiological function, which will become crucial and life-threatening if left untreated. Cancer can be a result of genetics, such as mutations or environmental causes, including smoking, lack of physical activity, as well as nutritional imbalance in the body. Vitamin D is one of the foremost nutrients that play a crucial role in a variety of biochemical pathways, and it is an important key factor in several diseases. Vitamin D is an essential nutrient for preventing malignancies and a complementary treatment for cancer through direct and indirect biochemical pathways. In this article, we summarized the correlation between vitamin D and various cancers using an extensive search on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. This paper reviews the role of vitamin D in different types of cancer.

Negative Impact of Vitamin D Deficiency at Diagnosis on Breast Cancer Survival: A Prospective Cohort Study

Objective. We prospectively evaluated the association between vitamin D concentration at diagnosis and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in postmenopausal women treated for breast cancer. Methods. This study included 192 patients newly diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, aged ≥45 years, and serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25 (OH)D) concentration assessment at diagnosis. Patients were classified into groups according to 25 (OH)D concentrations: sufficient (≥30 ng/mL), insufficient (between 20 and 29 ng/mL), and deficient (<20 ng/mL). The primary outcome was OS, and the secondary outcomes were DFS and CSS. The Kaplan–Meier curve and Cox regression model were used to assess the association between 25 (OH)D concentrations and survival rates. Differences in survival were evaluated by hazard ratios (HRs). Results. The mean age was 61.3 ± 9.6 years, 25 (OH)D concentration was 26.9 ± 7.5 ng/mL (range 12.0–59.2 ng/mL), and the follow-up period was between 54 and 78 months. Sufficient 25 (OH)D was detected in 33.9% of patients, insufficient in 47.9%, and deficient in 18.2%. A total of 51 patients (26.6%) died during the study period, with a mean OS time of 54.4 ± 20.2 months (range 9–78 months). Patients with 25 (OH)D deficiency and insufficiency at diagnosis had a significantly lower OS, DFS, and CSS compared with patients with sufficient values ( $p<\text{0}.001$ ). After adjustment for clinical and tumoral prognostic factors, patients with 25 (OH)D concentrations considered deficient at diagnosis had a significantly higher risk of global death (HR, 4.65; 95% CI, 1.65–13.12), higher risk of disease recurrence (HR, 6.87; 95% CI, 2.35–21.18), and higher risk of death from the disease (HR, 5.91; 95% CI, 1.98–17.60) than the group with sufficient 25(OH)D concentrations. Conclusion. In postmenopausal women treated for breast cancer, vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency at diagnosis were independently associated with lower OS, DFS, and CSS compared with patients with sufficient 25(OH)D concentrations.

The effect of vitamin D supplementation on the risk of breast cancer: a trial sequential meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Observational studies suggest an inverse association between circulating vitamin D levels and risk of breast cancer. However, the potential benefits of vitamin D supplementation to reduce the risk of breast cancer remain controversial, based on the results of current randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of vitamin D supplementation on breast cancer prevention.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched from inception to February 2020. We performed a trial sequential meta-analysis of RCTs reporting the effect of vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium, on the risk of breast cancer. The effect was estimated using a relative risk reduction threshold of 30%.

RESULTS

Eight trials comprising 72,275 participants were included in this study, with a median follow-up period ranging from 1 to 11.9 years. The median dosage of vitamin D supplementation was 967 IU per day (range 400-3704 IU per day) across the trials. This study yielded a relative risk of 1.04 (95% CI 0.85-1.29, P = 0.68) for the effect of vitamin D supplementation (6 trials, 33,472 participants), and 0.99 (95% CI 0.91-1.07, P = 0.73) for co-administration of vitamin D and calcium (4 trials, 41,957 participants). The effect estimate for vitamin D with or without calcium on breast cancer risk lay within the futility boundary, indicating that vitamin D supplementation does not alter the relative risk by 30% or more.

CONCLUSION

Our analyses suggest that vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium, does not reduce breast cancer risk by 30% or more. Future trials with similar designs are unlikely to alter this finding.

A multicenter case control study of association of vitamin D with breast cancer among women in Karachi, Pakistan

Background

The prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy and breast cancer are both high among women living in Karachi, Pakistan.

Methods

A matched case control study was conducted in two hospitals of Karachi, Pakistan to evaluate the association of vitamin D (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D) concentrations, vitamin D supplementation and sun exposure with breast cancer among Pakistani women. A total of 411 newly diagnosed histologically confirmed primary breast cancer cases were enrolled and 784 controls, free of breast and any other cancers, were matched by age (year of birth ± 5 years), residence in the same geographic area and study site. Information was collected on sociodemographic history, history of vitamin D supplementation, past medical and obstetrical history, family history of breast cancer, sun exposure history, histopathology reports and anthropometric measurement and venous blood was collected to measure serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration.

Results

Compared to patients with sufficient serum vitamin D (>30 ng/ml), women with serum vitamin D deficiency (<20ng/ml), had a higher risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.65, 95%CI: 1.10, 2.50). Women with history of vitamin D supplementation one year prior to enrollment, had significant protective effect against breast cancer (OR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.43).

Conclusions and recommendation

Serum vitamin D deficiency was associated with increased risk of breast cancer, while vitamin D supplementation was associated with decreased risk of breast cancer. In Pakistani women, where vitamin D deficiency is common, raising and maintaining serum vitamin D at population level is a safe and affordable strategy. It may play a role in reducing the incidence of both vitamin D deficiency and breast cancer, particularly among poor women where the breast cancer mortality is highest due to limited resources for early detection, diagnosis, and treatment. The effects of vitamin D with regard to breast cancer risk in Karachi Pakistan should be further evaluated.

Vitamin D pathway related polymorphisms and vitamin D receptor expression in breast cancer

Vitamin D deficiency is an emerging risk factor for breast cancer suggesting its role in breast cancer pathogenesis. Recent evidence suggests vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression is a prognosis predictor in breast cancer. We set out to determine the status of VDR expression in histologically characterized breast cancers, and whether common genetic variants modify VDR expression in breast cancer. One-hundred and twenty Kuwaiti female breast cancer fixed tissues were assessed for VDR expression to identify the level and location of its expression by immunohistochemistry. VDR variants (rs731236, rs2228570), and vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) variants (rs4588, rs7041) genotypes were ascertained in breast cancer specimens using Taqman genotyping assays. VDR nuclear expression correlated with low grade tumors (p = 0.01), whereas cytoplasmic expression correlated with lymph node positive tumors (p = 0.03). Absence of VDR expression was a marker for high-grade dedifferentiated tumors (p = 0.01). VDBP rs7041 associated with breast cancer risk (OR 1.92, 95% CI: 1.34 - 2.73; p = 0.0004), and VDR rs2228570 correlated with increased VDR cytoplasmic expression (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, VDR expression is altered in breast cancer confirming its involvement in breast cancer progression. Genetic factors appear to play a role in breast cancer risk, and may modify tumor sensitization to vitamin D.

Mammary-specific ablation of Cyp24a1 inhibits development, reduces proliferation and increases sensitivity to vitamin D

Active vitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) has been shown to regulate numerous cell processes in mammary cells. Degradation of 1,25(OH)2D is initiated by the mitochondrial enzyme, 25-hydroxyvitamin D 24-hydroxylase (CYP24 A1), and provides local control of 1,25(OH)2D bioactivity. Several reports of the association between elevated CYP24 A1 activity and breast cancer incidence, suggest that CYP24 A1 may be a target for therapeutic intervention. Whether CYP24 A1 activity within the mammary epithelium regulates 1,25(OH)2D levels and mammary gland development is yet to shown. We have used a conditional knockout of the Cyp24a1 gene specifically in the mammary epithelium to demonstrate reduced terminal end bud number, ductal outgrowth and branching during puberty and alveologenesis at early pregnancy, by inhibiting proliferation but not apoptosis in both basal and luminal MECs. In vitro study showed increased sensitivity of luminal MECs to lower levels of 1,25(OH)2D with the ablation of Cyp24a1 activity. In summary, Cyp24a1 within MECs plays an important role in modulating postnatal and pregnancy-associated mammary gland development which provides support for inhibiting CYP24 A1 as a potential approach to activating the vitamin D pathway in breast cancer prevention and therapy.