Laboratory trend in vitamin D status in Ireland: Dual concerns about low and high 25OHD

Vitamin D: determinants of status, indications for testing and knowledge in a convenience sample of Irish adults

Vitamin D deficiency is common in Irish adults, though there is limited research on its determinants, knowledge of vitamin D or indications for testing. We aimed to explore the determinants of vitamin D status in adults and examine knowledge and reasons for testing. The study population comprised adults who had serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D tested by general practitioners request at a Dublin Hospital in 2020. Questionnaires detailing dietary intake, sun exposure, ethnicity, biophysical factors and vitamin D knowledge were sent to a sample stratified by age, sex and vitamin D status. In total, there were 383 participants, mean age 56·0 (sd 16·6) years. Wintertime deficiency disproportionally affected non-white v. white (60 % v. 24 %, P < 0·001). The greatest predictors of deficiency were low vitamin D intake (< 10 μg/d) (P < 0·001) and non-white ethnicity (P = 0·006), followed by sun avoidance (P = 0·022). It was also more prevalent in those with lower body exposure when outdoors. The majority (86 %) identified vitamin D as important for bone health. However, 40 % were tested for non-clinical indications and half were not aware of the recommended daily allowance (RDA). Low vitamin D intake was the most important determinant of deficiency, but ethnicity and sun exposure habits were also significant predictors. The majority had no clear indication for testing and were not aware of the RDA. Public health policies to improve knowledge and vitamin D intake, especially for those of non-white ethnicity and with reduced sun exposure, should be considered.

Evaluation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study and trend analysis involving 86,772 samples

BACKGROUND

The aim of this paper was to evaluate the change in 25-hidroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

In this retrospective, cross-sectional and methodological study included 86,772 patients (18-75 years) samples who were admitted to the Izmir Dokuz Eylul University Hospital (latitude and longitude (Turkey): 27 E 09; 38 N 25, respectively) for various reasons and whose 25(OH)D levels were measured in the biochemistry unit between 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 (before and during the COVID-19 outbreak). A time series analysis of monthly averages for 25(OH)D was performed. For the purpose of seasonal study, the mean levels of 25(OH)D are grouped by years. Data were modeled in terms of 25(OH)D levels using the MATLAB Curve Fitting Toolbox.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the sexes according to 25(OH)D levels (p>0.05). 25(OH)D levels were significantly higher in the summer months and lower in the winter months (p<0.001). When comparing the spring months, 25(OH)D levels in 2020 (18 ± 10) were found to be significantly lower than in 2019 (22 ± 12) (p<0.001); on the contrary, when examined based on the summer, autumn, and winter months, it was determined that 25(OH)D levels increased in 2020 (summer: 25 ± 13, autumn: 25 ± 14, and winter: 19 ± 10) compared to 2019 (summer: 23 ± 11, autumn: 22 ± 10, and winter: 19 ± 11) (p<0.001). In the estimates curve obtained with an error margin of 11% in the time series analysis, it was estimated that the 25(OH)D averages after the pandemic would be similar to those before the pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Restrictions, partial or complete closures, and curfews can significantly affect individuals' 25(OH)D levels during the COVID-19 outbreak. There is a need for multicenter studies with larger populations covering different regions to strengthen and support our results.

COVID-19 pandemic and vitamin D: rising trends in status and in daily amounts of vitamin D provided by supplements

OBJECTIVES

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, there have been plausible suggestions about the need to augment vitamin D intake by supplementation in order to prevent SARS-CoV2 infection and reduce mortality. Some groups have advocated supplementation for all adults, but governmental agencies have advocated targeted supplementation. We sought to explore the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on both vitamin D status and on the dose of new-to-market vitamin D supplements.

SETTING

University hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

PARTICIPANTS

Laboratory-based samples of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) (n=100 505).

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes: comparing yearly average 25OHD prior to the pandemic (April 2019 to March 2020) with during the pandemic (April 2020 to March 2021) and comparing the dose of new-to-market vitamin D supplements between 2017 and 2021 (n=2689).

SECONDARY OUTCOME

comparing prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D excess during the two time periods.

RESULTS

The average yearly serum 25OHD measurement increased by 2.8 nmol/L (61.4, 95% CI 61.5 to 61.7 vs 58.6, 95% CI 58.4 to 58.9, p<0.001), which was almost threefold higher than two similar trend analyses that we conducted between 1993 and 2016. There was a lower prevalence of low 25OHD and a higher prevalence of high 25OHD. The dose of new-to-market vitamin D supplements was higher in the years 2020-2021 compared with the years 2017-2019 (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We showed significant increases in serum 25OHD and in the dose of new-to-market vitamin D supplements. The frequency of low vitamin D status reduced indicating benefit, but the frequency of vitamin D excess increased indicating risk of harm. Rather than a blanket recommendation about vitamin D supplementation for all adults, we recommend a targeted approach of supplementation within current governmental guidelines to at-risk groups and cautioning consumers about adverse effects of high dose supplements on the market.

Vitamin D retesting by general practitioners: a factor and cost analysis

OBJECTIVES

Vitamin D testing by Primary Care doctors is increasing, placing greater workloads on healthcare systems. There is little data though on vitamin D retesting in Ireland. This study aims to investigate the factors associated with vitamin D retesting by Irish General Practitioners (GPs) and examine the resulting costs.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis over 5 years (2014-2018) of GP requested 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) results in 36,458 patients at a major city hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Those with one test were compared with individuals who were retested and samples categorised to determine changes in status between tests.

RESULTS

Nearly one in four patients (n=8,305) were retested. Positive predictors of retesting were female (p<0.001), age (60-69 years, p<0.001), location (Co. Kildare, p<0.001) and initial deficiency (<30 nmol/L, p<0.001) or insufficiency (30-49.9 nmol/L, p<0.001). Vitamin D status improved on retesting, with deficiency halving on first retest (9 vs. 18%, p<0.001) and dropping to 6% on further retests. About 12.2% of retests were done within 3 months and 29% had ≥2 retests within 1 year. 57% of retests were in those initially vitamin D replete (>50 nmol/L). The annual cost of inappropriate testing was €61,976.

CONCLUSIONS

One in four patients were retested and this varied by age, gender and patient location. Over 10% of retests were inappropriately early (<3 months), a third too frequent and over half were in replete individuals incurring significant costs. Clear guidance for GPs on minimum retesting intervals is needed, as well as laboratory ordering systems to limit requests using pre-defined criteria.

Geomapping Vitamin D Status in a Large City and Surrounding Population-Exploring the Impact of Location and Demographics

Vitamin D status was assessed in a large urban area to compare differences in deficiency and to geomap the results. In total, 36,466 participants from 28 geographical areas were identified in this cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of general practitioner (GP)-requested 25(OH)D tests at St James's Hospital, Dublin between 2014 and 2018. The population were community-dwelling adults, median age 50.7 (18-109 years) with 15% of participants deficient (<30 nmol/L), rising to 23% in the winter. Deficiency was greatest in younger (18-39 years) and oldest (80+ years) adults, and in males versus females (18% vs. 11%, p < 0.001). Season was the biggest predictor of deficiency (OR 4.44, winter versus summer, p < 0.001), followed by location (west Dublin OR 2.17, north Dublin 1.54, south Dublin 1.42 versus rest of Ireland, p < 0.001) where several urban areas with an increased prevalence of deficiency were identified. There was no improvement in 25(OH)D over the 5-year period despite increased levels of testing. One in four adults were vitamin D deficient in the winter, with significant variations across locations and demographics. Overall this study identifies key groups at risk of 25(OH)D deficiency and insufficiency, thus providing important public health information for the targeting of interventions to optimise 25(OH)D. Mandatory fortification may be necessary to address this widespread inadequacy.