Functional malcentering of the humeral head and asymmetric long-term stress on the glenoid: potential reasons for glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty

B2 and B3 glenoid osteoarthirtis: outcomes of corrective and concentric (C2) reaming of the glenoid combined with pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Posterior humeral subluxation (PHS) in B2 and B3 glenoid is a cause of asymmetric long-term stress on the glenoid and the potential reason for glenoid loosening in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and painful glenoid erosion in hemiarthroplasty with metallic heads. We hypothesized that corrective and concentric (C2) reaming of the glenoid associated with pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty (HA-PYC) could improve the centering of the humeral head and decrease the risk of persistent painful glenoid erosion in young and active patients with B2 and B3 glenoid.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2020, 41shoulders (in 35 patients, mean age of 57.9 years) underwent HA-PYC combined with C2 reaming for B2 (n = 30) or B3 (n = 11) osteoarthritis. Patients were prospectively followed with computed tomography (CT) scans performed preoperatively, immediate postoperatively, and at last follow-up (>2 years). The primary outcomes were 3D-corrected CT scan measurements of glenoid version, PHS, and progression of glenoid erosion. Secondary outcomes included functional outcome scores, return to activities, and revision rate and complications.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (2-9.5 years), the prosthesis survival was 95% (39 of 41). No patient has been reoperated for painful glenoid erosion. The mean glenoid retroversion decreased from 17.1° ± 7.5° preoperatively to 8.3° ± 8.2° at last follow-up (P = .001), and the mean PHS from 74% to 56.5% (P = .001) based on the scapular plane and from 59.9% to 50.3% based on the glenoid plane. The humeral head was recentered in 97% according to the glenoid surface and 71% according to the scapular plane. Correction of PHS in the scapular plane was highly correlated to correction of glenoid retroversion (P < .001). CT scan measurements showed that the average total medialization was 3.7 ± 3.2 mm (2.0 ± 1.8 mm due to reaming and only 1.7 ± 2.4 mm due to erosion). The adjusted Constant Score increased from 43% ± 13% to 97% ± 16% and the Subjective Shoulder Value from 38% ± 14% to 84% ± 12% (P < .001). Overall, 84% of active patients returned to work, and all patients returned to sports.

CONCLUSION

In B2 and B3 glenoid arthritis, corrective, concentric glenoid reaming combined with HA-PYC improves centering of the humeral head and shows a low risk of painful glenoid erosion at midterm follow-up. The combined procedure results in excellent functional outcomes and high prosthesis survivorship at midterm follow-up. HA-PYC and C2 reaming of the glenoid is an alternative shoulder arthroplasty for young/active patients with type B glenoid osteoarthritis who want to return to work or sports practice.

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for posteriorly eccentric and concentric osteoarthritis: a comparison at a minimum 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

In patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis and posteriorly eccentric wear patterns, the early to midterm results of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) using conservative glenoid reaming with no attempt at version correction have been favorable at early follow-up. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of TSA using this technique for patients with and without eccentric wear patterns at a minimum 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

Patients who underwent TSA with minimum 5-year follow-up were identified from an institutional registry. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were used to determine humeroglenoid alignment (HGA-AP), humeroscapular alignment (HSA-AP), version, Walch classification, and glenoid component seating. The outcome measures were the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), glenoid component radiolucencies, and the occurrence of complications or revisions.

RESULTS

Two hundred ten patients were included in the study, of which 98 (47%) had posteriorly decentered humeral heads and 108 (51%) had centered humeral heads. There were 77 shoulders with Walch type A glenoids and 122 with Walch type B glenoids. At a mean 8-year follow-up, the final SST score, change in SST score, and percentage of maximal improvement was not correlated with pre- and postoperative humeral head centering, Walch classification, or glenoid version. There were no preoperative predictors of a low final SST score. Two patients (1%) underwent open reoperations during the study period. In patients with Walch B1 and B2 glenoids (n = 110), there were no differences in outcome measures between patients with postoperative retroversion of more and less than 15°. Although 15 of 51 patients (29%) with minimum 5-year radiographs had glenoid radioluciences, these radiographic findings were not associated with inferior clinical outcomes. On multivariable analysis, glenoid component radiolucencies were most strongly associated with incomplete component seating (OR 3.3, P = .082).

CONCLUSION

The results of TSA with conservative glenoid reaming without attempt at version correction are favorable at a minimum 5-year, and mean 8-year, follow-up. There were no differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients with eccentric and concentric wear patterns. Incomplete glenoid component seating was the greatest predictor of glenoid component radiolucency, but these radiolucencies were not associated with inferior clinical outcomes.

Implant Sizing and Positioning in Anatomical Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Rotator Cuff-Sparing Postero-Inferior Approach

Background: The goal of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a rotator cuff-sparing postero-inferior (PI) approach with subdeltoidal access to the traditional subscapularis-takedown deltopectoral approach, in terms of implant sizing and positioning in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). Methods: This study involved 18 human cadaveric shoulders with intact rotator cuffs and no evidence of head deforming osteoarthritis. An Eclipse stemless aTSA (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) was implanted in nine randomly selected specimens using a standard subscapularis-tenotomy deltopectoral approach, and in the other nine specimens using the cuff-sparing PI approach. Pre- and postoperative antero-posterior (AP) and axillary fluoroscopic radiographs were analyzed by two independent, blinded raters for the following parameters: (1) anatomic and prosthetic neck-shaft angle (NSA); (2) the shift between the anatomic and prosthetic center of rotation (COR); (3) anatomical size matching of the prosthetic humeral head; (4) the calculated Anatomic Reconstruction Score (ARS); (5) glenoid positioning; as well as (6) glenoid inclination and version. Results: While the COR was slightly but significantly positioned (p = 0.031) to be more medial in the PI approach group (3.7 ± 3.4%, range: −2.3% to 8.7%) than in the deltopectoral approach group (−0.2 ± 3.6%, range: −6.9% to 4.1%), on average, none of the remaining measured radiographic parameters significantly differed between both groups (PI approach group vs. deltopectoral group: NSA 130° vs. 127°, p = 0.57; COR supero-inferior, 2.6% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.35; COR antero-posterior, 0.9% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.57; head size supero-inferior, 97.3% vs. 98.5%, p = 0.15; head size antero-posterior, 101.1% vs. 100.6%, p = 0.54; ARS, 8.4 vs. 9.3, p = 0.13; glenoid positioning supero-inferior, 49.1% vs. 51.1%, p = 0.33; glenoid positioning antero-posterior, 49.3% vs. 50.4%, p = 0.23; glenoid inclination, 86° vs. 88°, p = 0.27; and glenoid retroversion, 91° vs. 89°, p = 0.27). Conclusions: A PI approach allows for sufficient exposure and orientation to perform rotator-cuff sparing aTSA with acceptable implant sizing and positioning in cadaveric specimens.

A finite element model of the shoulder: application to the changes of biomechanical environment induced by postoperative malrotation of humeral shaft fracture

Objectives

The humerus fracture is one of the most commonly occurring fractures. In this research, we attempted to evaluate and compare the extent of malrotation and biomechanical environment after surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures.

Methods

A finite element (FE) model of the shoulder was built based on Computed Tomography (CT) data of a patient with a humeral shaft fracture. The muscle group around the shoulder joint was simulated by spring elements. The changes of shoulder stresses under rotation were analyzed. The biomechanics of the normal shoulder and postoperative malrotation of the humeral shaft was analyzed and compared.

Results

During rotations, the maximum stress was centered in the posterosuperior part of the glenoid for the normal shoulder. The von Mises shear stresses were 4.40 MPa and 4.89 MPa at 40° of internal and external rotations, respectively. For internal rotation deformity, the shear contact forces were 7–9 times higher for the shoulder internally rotated 40° than for the normal one. For external rotation deformity, the shear contact forces were about 3–5 times higher for the shoulder with 40° external rotation than the normal one.

Conclusion

Postoperative malrotation of humeral shaft fracture induced the changes of the biomechanical environment of the shoulders. The peak degree of malrotation was correlated with increased stresses of shoulders, which could be paid attention to in humeral shaft fracture treatment. We hoped to provide information about the biomechanical environment of humeral malrotation.

CT-based and morphological comparison of glenoid inclination and version angles and mineralisation distribution in human body donors

Background

For optimal prosthetic anchoring in omarthritis surgery, a differentiated knowledge on the mineralisation distribution of the glenoid is important. However, database on the mineralisation of diseased joints and potential relations with glenoid angles is limited.

Methods

Shoulder specimens from ten female and nine male body donors with an average age of 81.5 years were investigated. Using 3D-CT-multiplanar reconstruction, glenoid inclination and retroversion angles were measured, and osteoarthritis signs graded. Computed Tomography-Osteoabsorptiometry (CT-OAM) is an established method to determine the subchondral bone plate mineralisation, which has been demonstrated to serve as marker for the long-term loading history of joints. Based on mineralisation distribution mappings of healthy shoulder specimens, physiological and different CT-OAM patterns were compared with glenoid angles.

Results

Osteoarthritis grades were 0-I in 52.6% of the 3D-CT-scans, grades II-III in 34.3%, and grade IV in 13.2%, with in females twice as frequently (45%) higher grades (III, IV) than in males (22%, III). The average inclination angle was 8.4°. In glenoids with inclination ≤10°, mineralisation was predominantly centrally distributed and tended to shift more cranially when the inclination raised to > 10°. The average retroversion angle was − 5.2°. A dorsally enhanced mineralisation distribution was found in glenoids with versions from − 15.9° to + 1.7°. A predominantly centrally distributed mineralisation was accompanied by a narrower range of retroversion angles between − 10° to − 0.4°.

Conclusions

This study is one of the first to combine CT-based analyses of glenoid angles and mineralisation distribution in an elderly population. The data set is limited to 19 individuals, however, indicates that superior inclination between 0° and 10°-15°, and dorsal version ranging between − 9° to − 3° may be predominantly associated with anterior and central mineralisation patterns previously classified as physiological for the shoulder joint. The current basic research findings may serve as basic data set for future studies addressing the glenoid geometry for treatment planning in omarthritis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04660-4.

Subluxation in the Arthritic Shoulder

»

The term "subluxation" means partial separation of the joint surfaces. In the arthritic shoulder, "arthritic glenohumeral subluxation" refers to displacement of the humeral head on the surface of the glenoid.

»

The degree of arthritic glenohumeral subluxation can be measured using radiography with standardized axillary views or computed tomography (CT).

»

Shoulders with a type-B1 or B2 glenoid may show more posterior subluxation on an axillary radiograph that is made with the arm in an elevated position than on a CT scan that is made with the arm at the side.

»

The degree of arthritic glenohumeral subluxation is not closely related to glenoid retroversion.

»

The position of the humeral head with respect to the plane of the scapula is related to glenoid retroversion and is not a measure of glenohumeral subluxation.

»

Studies measuring glenohumeral subluxation before and after arthroplasty should clarify its importance to the clinical outcomes of shoulder reconstruction.

Relationship Between Glenoid Component Shift and Osteolysis After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate glenoid component position and radiolucency following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) using sequential 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) analysis.

METHODS

In a series of 152 patients (42 Walch A1, 16 A2, 7 B1, 49 B2, 29 B3, 3 C1, 3 C2, and 3 D glenoids) undergoing anatomic TSA with a polyethylene glenoid component, sequential 3D CT analysis was performed preoperatively (CT1), early postoperatively (CT2), and at a minimum 2-year follow-up (CT3). Glenoid component shift was defined as a change in component version or inclination of ≥3° from CT2 to CT3. Glenoid component central anchor peg osteolysis (CPO) was assessed at CT3. Factors associated with glenoid component shift and CPO were evaluated.

RESULTS

Glenoid component shift occurred from CT2 to CT3 in 78 (51%) of the 152 patients. CPO was seen at CT3 in 19 (13%) of the 152 patients, including 15 (19%) of the 78 with component shift. Walch B2 glenoids with a standard component and glenoids with higher preoperative retroversion were associated with a higher rate of shift, but not of CPO. B3 glenoids with an augmented component and glenoids with greater preoperative joint-line medialization were associated with CPO, but not with shift. More glenoid component joint-line medialization from CT2 to CT3 was associated with higher rates of shift and CPO. A greater absolute change in glenoid component inclination from CT2 to CT3 and a combined absolute glenoid component version and inclination change from CT2 to CT3 were associated with CPO. Neither glenoid component shift nor CPO was associated with worse clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative 3D CT analysis demonstrated that glenoid component shift commonly occurs following anatomic TSA, with increased inclination the most common direction. Most (81%) of the patients with glenoid component shift did not develop CPO. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the relationships of glenoid component shift and CPO with loosening over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

3D preoperative planning for humeral head selection in total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Recreation of glenohumeral biomechanics and humeral anatomy has been shown to improve outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty. Recent research has focused on utilizing simulation software and intraoperative instrumentation to improve glenoid implant selection and positioning, but no study had evaluated the reliability of new features in 3D preoperative planning software for humeral planning in total shoulder arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative plans were created for 26 patients using three different simulation software programs: an independent preoperative planning simulation (IPPS) software (OrthoVis) and two automated manufacturers preoperative simulation systems: ArthrexVIP™ (AMPS I) and Tornier Blueprint™ 3D Planning (AMPS II). Preoperative plans were compared for reliability and consistency among different software systems based on available variables including humeral head diameter (HD) and head height (HH).

RESULTS

The measured HD was consistent between the three systems with a maximum mean difference of 0.2 mm for HD among IPPS, AMPS I, and AMPS II (p = 0.964). There was a significant difference in measured humeral HH with 1.7 mm difference between IPPS and AMPS II (p ≤ 0.001). The strongest correlation when comparing humeral head measurements (diameter or height) obtained from all systems was seen between IPPS and AMPS I for humeral HD (r = 0.8; p ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There was a high level of consistency between independent and manufacturer preoperative planning software for humeral head measurements. These preoperative planning systems can improve efficiency and workflow during surgery by guiding surgeons on implant size selection to optimally reconstruct the glenohumeral kinematics, in order to improve patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, study of nonconsecutive patients and without a universally applied "gold" standard study of diagnostic test.

Different acromial roof morphology in concentric and eccentric osteoarthritis of the shoulder: a multiplane reconstruction analysis of 105 shoulder computed tomography scans

BACKGROUND

The pathomechanisms of eccentric osteoarthritis of the shoulder remain unclear. Although there is increasing evidence of bony differences between shoulders with rotator cuff tears and osteoarthritis, analogous differences have not been identified for primary concentric and eccentric osteoarthritis. This study examined the shape and orientation of the acromial roof as a potential risk factor for the development of posterior glenoid wear.

METHODS

We analyzed computed tomography images of 105 shoulders with primary osteoarthritis. Based on the classification of Walch, 45 shoulders had concentric osteoarthritis (Walch A) and 60 shoulders were affected by eccentric osteoarthritis (Walch B; EOA). A comparison of acromial morphology was performed in a multiplanar reconstruction analysis of computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

Acromial shape: Acromial length, width, and area were not significantly different. Acromial roof orientation: The acromial roof in EOA was an average of 5° flatter (sagittal tilt; P < .01) and 5° more downward tilted (coronal tilt; P < .01). There was no difference in axial rotation (axial tilt; P = .47). Anteroposterior glenoid coverage: The glenoid in EOA was covered an average of 4° less posteriorly (P = .01) and 4° more anteriorly (P = .04). No differences were shown for overall glenoid coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

The acromial roof could play a role in the pathogenesis of EOA. Less posterior support due to a flatter acromion with less posterior glenoid coverage could contribute to static posterior subluxation of the humeral head and posterior glenoid wear. Further biomechanical investigations are needed to confirm these findings.

Subscapularis Insufficiency: What’s All the Fuss About?

There has been increase attention to the surgical treatment of the subscapularis (SSC) tendon with risk of postoperative dysfunction and early failures following shoulder arthroplasty. Studies investigating the clinical results after shoulder arthroplasty indicate that SSC tendon detachment or incision techniques and rehabilitation concepts may impair SSC recovery and consequently the postoperative function. In response to these results, technical modifications have been proposed and evaluated anatomically, biomechanically, and clinically. The aim of this article is to give an overview of current SSC take-down approaches, subsequent repair techniques, and postoperative rehabilitation protocols as well as to present the diagnostic algorithm and clinical impacts of the increasingly acknowledged condition of SSC insufficiency following shoulder arthroplasty procedures.

Sequential 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis of implant position following total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Detection of postoperative component position and implant shift following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) can be challenging using routine imaging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate glenoid component position over time using 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) analysis with minimum 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

Twenty patients underwent primary TSA with sequential CT scanning of the shoulder: a preoperative study, an immediate postoperative study within 2 weeks of surgery, and a postoperative study performed at minimum 2-year follow-up (CT3). Postoperative glenoid component position and central peg osteolysis were assessed across the immediate postoperative CT scan and CT3. Glenoids with evidence of component shift and/or grade 1 central peg osteolysis on CT3 were considered at risk of loosening.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 7 (35%) showed evidence of glenoid components at risk of loosening on CT3, 6 with component shift (3 with increased inclination alone, 1 with increased retroversion alone, and 2 with both increased inclination and retroversion). Significantly more patients with glenoid component shift had grade 1 central peg osteolysis on CT3 compared with those without shift (83% vs 7%, P = .002). One clinical failure occurred, with the patient undergoing revision to reverse TSA for rotator cuff deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional CT imaging analysis following TSA identified changes in glenoid component position over time, with inclination being the most common direction of shift and grade 1 central peg osteolysis commonly associated with shift. These findings raise concern for glenoids at risk of loosening, but further follow-up is needed to determine the long-term clinical impact of these findings.

Walch B0 glenoid: pre-osteoarthritic posterior subluxation of the humeral head

The management of primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder has been well investigated. However, the etiology and management of posterior humeral head subluxation in the context of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis remain controversial. The finding of static posterior subluxation of the humeral head before the development of posterior bone erosion of the glenoid in young men with radiographic findings of primary osteoarthritis has been described as arthrogenic posterior subluxation of the humeral head. It demonstrates the earliest form of the osteoarthritic evolution, and an excessive glenoid retroversion is the only probable cause of this static subluxation, although this is controversial. The clinical relevance of these findings is important in allowing the identification of patients at risk for development of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and in developing an early treatment for the subluxation to try to alter the natural course of this disease. The aim of our summary paper was to review the current literature on this matter in an attempt to better understand the pathophysiologic mechanism of this condition, which we named pre-osteoarthritic posterior subluxation of the humeral head, or Walch B-zero (B0) glenoid. It appears that Walch B0 glenoid is a pathologic condition (initially dynamic, eventually evolving into a static condition) that may lead to posterior erosion of the glenoid, taking place once there is asymmetric increased posterior glenohumeral contact forces and possibly associated with increased glenoid retroversion.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of the Ream-and-Run Procedure for Primary Glenohumeral Arthritis

BACKGROUND

The ream-and-run procedure can provide improvement in shoulder function and comfort for selected patients with primary glenohumeral arthritis who wish to avoid a prosthetic glenoid component. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors associated with medialization of the humeral head after this procedure as well as the relationship of medialization to the clinical outcome.

METHODS

We collected patient, shoulder, and procedure characteristics along with Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores before surgery and at the time of follow-up. Medialization was determined by comparing the position of the humeral head prosthesis in relation to the scapula on postoperative baseline radiographs made within 6 weeks after surgery with that on comparable follow-up radiographs made ≥18 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Two-year clinical outcomes were available for 101 patients (95% were male). Comparable radiographs at postoperative baseline and follow-up evaluations were available for 50 shoulders. For all patients, the mean SST score (and standard deviation) increased from 4.9 ± 2.8 preoperatively to 10.3 ± 2.4 at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Significant clinical improvement was observed for glenoid types A2 and B2. Shoulders with a type-A2 glenoid morphology, with larger preoperative scapular body-glenoid angles, and with lower preoperative SST scores, were associated with the greatest clinical improvement. Clinical outcome was not significantly associated with the amount of medialization.

CONCLUSIONS

The ream-and-run procedure can be an effective treatment for advanced primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in active patients. Further study will be necessary to determine whether medialization affects the clinical outcome with follow-up of >2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Glenoid morphology in light of anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a dissection- and 3D-CT-based study in male and female body donors

Background

Placement of the glenoid baseplate is of paramount importance for the outcome of anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. However, the database around glenoid size is poor, particularly regarding small scapulae, for example, in women and smaller individuals, and is derived from different methodological approaches. In this multimodality cadaver study, we systematically examined the glenoid using morphological and 3D-CT measurements.

Methods

Measurements of the glenoid and drill hole tunnel length for superior baseplate screw placement were recorded to define size of the glenoid and the distance to the scapular notch on cadaveric specimens. Glenoid angles were determined on both, 3D-CT-scans of the thoraxes using the Friedman method and on subsequently isolated scapulae from 18 male and female donors (average 84 years, range 60–98 years).

Results

Mean glenoid height was 36.6 mm ± 3.6, and width 27.8 mm ± 3.1 with a significant sex dimorphism (p ≤ 0.001): in males, glenoid height 39.5 mm ± 3.5, and width 30.3 mm ± 3.3, and in females, glenoid height 34.8 mm ± 2.2, and width 26.2 mm ± 1.6. The average distance from the superior screw entry to its exit in the scapular notch measured by calliper was 27.2 mm ± 6.0 with a sex difference: in males, 29.4 mm ± 5.7, and in females, 25.8 mm ± 5.9 mm with a minimum recorded distance of 15 mm. Measured by CT, the mean inclination angle for male and female donors combined was 13.0° ± 7.0, and the ante-/retroversion angle −1.0° ± 4.0°.

Conclusion

This study is one of the first to combine dissection, including drill holes, with anatomical measurements and radiological data. In some women and smaller individuals, smaller baseplates should be selected. The published safe zone of 20 mm is generally feasible for superior screw placement, however, in small patients this distance may be substantially shorter than expected and start as of 13 and 15 mm, respectively. No correlation between glenoid height or width with the length of our drilling canal towards the scapular notch was found. Preoperative CT-based treatment planning to determine version and inclination angles is recommended.

Management of intraoperative posterior decentering in shoulder arthroplasty using anteriorly eccentric humeral head components

BACKGROUND

Posterior humeral decentering presents a challenge in glenohumeral arthroplasty. Soft tissue releases and osteophyte resection can lead to intraoperative decentering not evident preoperatively. Inferior outcomes result if decentering is not addressed as a part of the arthroplasty. When there is >50% posterior subluxation of the humeral head on passive elevation of the arm at surgery, we have used an anteriorly eccentric humeral head component to improve centering of the humeral articular surface on the glenoid.

METHODS

We reviewed the 2-year outcomes for 33 shoulder arthroplasties in which anteriorly eccentric humeral heads were used to manage posterior decentering identified at surgery. Rotator interval plication was performed in 16 cases as an adjunctive stabilizing procedure. Shoulders were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with the Simple Shoulder Test (SST). Radiographic centering was characterized before surgery and at follow-up on standardized axillary radiographs with the arm held in a position of functional elevation.

RESULTS

With the anteriorly eccentric head component, preoperative radiographic humeral decentering was reduced from 10.4% ± 7.9% to 0.9% ± 2.3% postoperatively (P < .001). SST scores improved from 4.8 ± 2.3 to 10.0 ± 2.3 (P < .001). Preoperative posterior humeral head decentering did not correlate with preoperative glenoid version. Glenoid retroversion was 19.8° ± 8.9° preoperatively and 15.5° ± 7.5° postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior decentering identified at surgery when standard trial components are in place can be addressed by replacing the anatomic humeral head with an anteriorly eccentric humeral head component.

What Factors are Predictive of Patient-reported Outcomes? A Prospective Study of 337 Shoulder Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Although shoulder arthroplasties generally are effective in improving patients' comfort and function, the results are variable for reasons that are not well understood.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We posed two questions: (1) What factors are associated with better 2-year outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty? (2) What are the sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of a multivariate predictive model for better outcome?

METHODS

Three hundred thirty-nine patients having a shoulder arthroplasty (hemiarthroplasty, arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy, ream and run arthroplasty, total shoulder or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty) between August 24, 2010 and December 31, 2012 consented to participate in this prospective study. Two patients were excluded because they were missing baseline variables. Forty-three patients were missing 2-year data. Univariate and multivariate analyses determined the relationship of baseline patient, shoulder, and surgical characteristics to a "better" outcome, defined as an improvement of at least 30% of the maximal possible improvement in the Simple Shoulder Test. The results were used to develop a predictive model, the accuracy of which was tested using a 10-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

After controlling for potentially relevant confounding variables, the multivariate analysis showed that the factors significantly associated with better outcomes were American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I (odds ratio [OR], 1.94; 95% CI, 1.03-3.65; p = 0.041), shoulder problem not related to work (OR, 5.36; 95% CI, 2.15-13.37; p < 0.001), lower baseline Simple Shoulder Test score (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.23-1.42; p < 0.001), no prior shoulder surgery (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.18-2.70; p = 0.006), humeral head not superiorly displaced on the AP radiograph (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.15-4.02; p = 0.017), and glenoid type other than A1 (OR, 4.47; 95% CI, 2.24-8.94; p < 0.001). Neither preoperative glenoid version nor posterior decentering of the humeral head on the glenoid were associated with the outcomes. The model predictive of a better result was driven mainly by the six factors listed above. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve generated from the cross-validated enhanced predictive model was 0.79 (generally values of 0.7 to 0.8 are considered fair and values of 0.8 to 0.9 are considered good). The false-positive fraction and the true-positive fraction depended on the cutoff probability selected (ie, the selected probability above which the prediction would be classified as a better outcome). A cutoff probability of 0.68 yielded the best performance of the model with cross-validation predictions of better outcomes for 236 patients (80%) and worse outcomes for 58 patients (20%); sensitivity of 91% (95% CI, 88%-95%); specificity of 65% (95% CI, 53%-77%); positive predictive value of 92% (95% CI, 88%-95%); and negative predictive value of 64% (95% CI, 51%-76%).

CONCLUSIONS

We found six easy-to-determine preoperative patient and shoulder factors that were significantly associated with better outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty. A model based on these characteristics had good predictive properties for identifying patients likely to have a better outcome from shoulder arthroplasty. Future research could refine this model with larger patient populations from multiple practices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

Can the ream and run procedure improve glenohumeral relationships and function for shoulders with the arthritic triad?

BACKGROUND

The arthritic triad of glenoid biconcavity, glenoid retroversion, and posterior displacement of the humeral head on the glenoid is associated with an increased risk of failure of total shoulder joint replacement. Although a number of glenohumeral arthroplasty techniques are being used to manage this complex pathology, problems with glenoid component failure remain. In that the ream and run procedure manages arthritic pathoanatomy without a glenoid component, we sought evidence that this procedure can be effective in improving the centering of the humeral head contact on the glenoid and in improving the comfort and function of shoulders with the arthritic triad without the risk of glenoid component failure.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked, for shoulders with the arthritic triad, whether the ream and run procedure could improve glenohumeral relationships as measured on standardized axillary radiographs and patient-reported shoulder comfort and function as recorded by the Simple Shoulder Test.

METHODS

Between January 1, 2006 and December 14, 2011, we performed 531 primary anatomic glenohumeral arthroplasties for arthritis, of which 221 (42%) were ream and run procedures. Of these, 30 shoulders in 30 patients had the ream and run procedure for the arthritic triad and had two years of clinical and radiographic follow-up. These 30 shoulders formed the basis for this case series. The average age of the patients was 56 ± 8 years; all but one were male. Two of the 30 patients requested revision to total shoulder arthroplasty within the first year after their ream and run procedure because of their dissatisfaction with their rehabilitation progress. For the 28 shoulders not having had a revision, we determined on the standardized axillary views before and after surgery the glenoid type, glenoid version (90° minus the angle between the plane of the glenoid face and the plane of the body of the scapula), and location of the humeral contact point with respect to the anteroposterio dimension of the glenoid (the ratio of the distance from the anterior glenoid lip to the contact point divided by the distance between the anterior and posterior glenoid lips). We also recorded the patient's self-assessed shoulder comfort and function before and after surgery using the 12 questions of the Simple Shoulder Test.

RESULTS

For the 28 unrevised shoulders the mean followup was 3.0 years (range, 2-9.2 years). In these patients, the ream and run procedure resulted in improved centering of the humeral head on the face of the glenoid (preoperative: 75% ± 7% posterior; postoperative: 59% ± 10% posterior; mean difference 16% [95% CI, 13%-19%]; p < 0.001), notably this improved centering was achieved without a significant change in the glenoid version. Patient-reported function was improved (preoperative Simple Shoulder Test: 5 ± 3, postoperative Simple Shoulder Test: 10 ± 4, mean difference 5 [95% CI, 4-6], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For shoulders with the arthritic triad, the ream and run procedure can provide improvement in humeral centering on the glenoid and in patient-reported shoulder comfort and function without the risk of glenoid component failure. In that ream and run is a new procedure, substantial additional clinical research with long-term follow-up is needed to define specifically the shoulder characteristics, the patient characteristics and the technical details that are most likely to lead to durable improvements in the comfort and function of shoulders with the challenging pathology known as the arthritic triad.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Total shoulder arthroplasty using a subscapularis-sparing approach: a radiographic analysis

BACKGROUND

Traditional total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) involves releasing the subscapularis tendon for exposure. This can potentially lead to subscapularis insufficiency, compromised function, and dissatisfaction. A novel TSA technique preserves the subscapularis tendon by performing the procedure entirely through the rotator interval, allowing accelerated rehabilitation. However, early reports on this approach have noted malpositioning of the humeral component and residual osteophytes. In a randomized trial, we examined the incidence of humeral head malpositioning, incorrect sizing, and residual osteophytes on postoperative radiographs after subscapularis-sparing TSA compared with the traditional approach.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively randomized to undergo TSA performed through the traditional or subscapularis-sparing approach. The operating surgeon was blinded to the randomization until the day of surgery. Anatomic reconstruction measurements included humeral head height, humeral head centering, humeral head medial offset, humeral head diameter (HHD), and head-neck angle. Two independent reviewers analyzed the postoperative radiographs to determine anatomic restoration of the humeral head and the presence of residual osteophytes.

RESULTS

We randomized 96 patients to undergo either the standard approach (n = 50) or the subscapularis-sparing approach (n = 46). There were no significant differences in humeral head height, humeral head centering, humeral head medial offset, HHD, head-neck angle, and anatomic reconstruction index between the 2 groups. However, significantly more postoperative osteophytes (P = .0001) were noted in the subscapularis-sparing TSA group. Although the overall mean was not statistically different, further analysis of HHD showed that more patients in the subscapularis-sparing TSA group were outliers (mismatch >4 mm) than in the traditional TSA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although anatomic restoration of the shoulder can be accomplished using subscapularis-sparing TSA, retained osteophytes and significant mismatch of the HHD raise concerns regarding long-term outcomes.

Accuracy of the glenohumeral subluxation index in nonpathologic shoulders

BACKGROUND

Correction of posterior humeral subluxation, measured by the humeral subluxation index (HSI) according to Walch, is necessary in total shoulder arthroplasty to prevent early loosening. The 3-dimensional (3D) measurement of the shoulder is becoming well accepted and common practice as it overcomes positional errors to which 2-dimensional (2D) glenohumeral measurements are prone. The first objective was to describe the HSI in a nonpathologic population with the 2D HSI according to Walch and a newly described 3D HSI method. The second objective was to compare both measuring methods with each other.

METHODS

In 151 nonpathologic shoulders, the 2D HSI was measured on the midaxial computed tomography scan cut of the scapula. The 3D HSI, based on the native glenoid plane, was defined as [formula in text], in which X is the projection of the center of the humeral head to the anteroposterior axis of the glenoid fossa and R is the radius of the humeral head. Both measuring methods were compared with each other. Correlation was determined. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the 3D HSI was measured.

RESULTS

The mean 3D HSI (51.5% ± 2.7%) was significantly (P < .001) more posterior than the mean 2D HSI (48.7% ± 5.2%), with a mean difference of 2.9% ± 5.6%. No correlation was found between the 2D and 3D HSI. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability was excellent.

CONCLUSION

The 2D HSI seems to underestimate the humeral subluxation compared with a 3D reliable equivalent.

Glenoid subchondral bone density distribution in male total shoulder arthroplasty subjects with eccentric and concentric wear

BACKGROUND

Glenoid component loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty may be prevented by component placement on a congruent and adequate bony surface. Glenoid subchondral bone density (SBD) variability may be correlated with this concept. This study analyzed the 3-dimensional distribution of glenoid SBD in total shoulder arthroplasty patients with osteoarthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry (CT-OAM) was performed in 42 men (21 with eccentric and 21 with concentric wear patterns) with glenohumeral arthritis. Glenoid SBD was measured from the joint surface based on 5 clinically relevant topographic zones. The correlation of the wear pattern with the SBD distribution was investigated.

RESULTS

The glenoid subarticular layers could be separated into distinct regions: calcified cartilage (≤ 1.5 mm), subchondral plate (2-4.5 mm) and cancellous bone (≥ 5 mm). There were significant differences in SBD among these layers within and between patients with concentric and eccentric wear patterns. In concentric glenoids, the SBD distribution was homogeneous, with greater mineralization in the central zone, 1,749.1 ± 162.3 Hounsfield units (HU) (at 2.5 mm), compared with the posterior, anterior, and superior zones (P < .001). In the eccentric group, the SBD distribution was inhomogeneous. Mineralization was greatest in the posterior zone, 1,739.0 ± 172.6 HU (at 2.5 mm), followed by the inferior zone, 1,722.1 ± 186.6 HU (at 3 mm).

CONCLUSION

This study represents the first study using CT-OAM to evaluate the 3-dimensional SBD distribution of the glenoid vault for different arthritic wear patterns. The study findings indicate that the SBD distribution is dependent on (1) depth from the articular surface, (2) topographic zone, and (3) wear pattern. CT-OAM may be an effective tool to assist in preoperative planning for shoulder arthroplasty.

3D CT assessment of the relationship between humeral head alignment and glenoid retroversion in glenohumeral osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Glenoid bone loss associated with advanced glenohumeral arthritis is frequently accompanied by subluxation of the humeral head with subsequent inferior outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesized that the relationship between the center of the humeral head and the perpendicular to the glenoid fossa plane differs from, and is independent of, the relationship between the center of the humeral head and the plane of the scapula.

METHODS

Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) imaging was performed on sixty patients with advanced osteoarthritis and fifteen controls with no osteoarthritis to define the baseline relationship between the center of the humeral head and the perpendicular to the glenoid fossa plane and the plane of the scapula. Correlations between these variables and the amount of bone loss and glenoid version were assessed.

RESULTS

There was a strong linear relationship (p &lt; 0.001) between glenoid retroversion and the center of the humeral head in relation to the center line of the scapula (humeral-scapular alignment). Humeral head alignment in relation to the glenoid plane (humeral-glenoid alignment) was variable and not strongly correlated with the amount of glenoid retroversion. The average glenoid retroversion for the normal shoulders was -3.5°, and the average humeral-scapular alignment offset percentage was -2.3%. The average humeral-glenoid alignment offset for the normal shoulders was 0.5 mm with an average humeral-glenoid alignment offset percentage of 0.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The location of the humeral head in relation to the glenoid can be defined as displacement from the plane of the scapula and from the perpendicular of the glenoid plane. These two measures are independent of one another. The data suggest that each measurement may represent a different effect on glenoid loading.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The importance of this study is that it presents quantitative data and clear guidelines to define two measurements of glenohumeral alignment as separate and important variables. The clinical relevance of these methods will be further defined when they are correlated with clinical outcomes.

Glenohumeral relationships: subchondral mineralization patterns, thickness of cartilage, and radii of curvature

Subchondral mineralization represents the loading history of a joint and can be measured in vivo using computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry. Different mineralization patterns in the glenohumeral joint have been explained by the principle of physiologic incongruence. We sought to support this explanation by measurement of mineralization, radii, and cartilage thickness in 18 fresh shoulder specimens. We found three mineralization patterns: bicentric, monocentric anterior, and monocentric central. Mean radii of the glenoids were 27.4 mm for bicentric glenoids, 27.3 mm for monocentric anterior, and 24.8 mm for monocentric central glenoids. Cartilage thickness measurement revealed the highest values in anterior parts; the thinnest cartilage was found centrally. Our findings support the principle of a physiologic incongruence in the glenohumeral joint. Bicentric mineralization patterns exist in joints consisting of more flat glenoids compared to the corresponding humeral head. Monocentric distribution with a central maximum was found in specimens with glenoids being more curved, indicating higher degrees of congruence, which might represent an early stage of degenerative disease. The obtained information might also be important for implant fixation in resurfacing procedures or to achieve the best possible fit of an osteochondral allograft in the repair of cartilage defects.

Development and validation of a new method of 3-dimensional assessment of glenoid and humeral component position after total shoulder arthroplasty

HYPOTHESIS

This study evaluates the intrarater and inter-rater reliability of 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) measurements of component position and alignment after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two patients and one whole-body cadaver with anatomic TSA implants underwent CT scans of the shoulder with a 0.6-mm slice thickness in two different arm positions (supine arm down or lateral decubitus arm up) on the same day. Test-retest reliability of component measurements within and between 5 observers was determined, as were any differences in measurements based on arm position. Precision and 95% confidence intervals were determined for the following measurements: glenoid component position (anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, and medial-lateral), glenoid component orientation (version, inclination, and roll), and humeral-glenoid alignment (HGA). HGA was defined in the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior dimensions.

RESULTS

The range of precision for measurement of the position of the glenoid implant across observers was between 0.2 and 0.5 mm, and for orientation, it was between 1.2° and 1.5°. The range of precision for measurement of HGA across observers was between 0.7 and 1.2 mm. There was no significant difference in the precision of measurements between the two imaged arm positions.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The described method of 3-dimensional CT imaging can provide very precise and reproducible assessment of component position after TSA. Ultimately, correlation of these measurements with clinical outcome, anatomic factors, prosthetic design, and surgical factors will allow for better understanding of the causes of implant failure.

Accuracy and reliability of postoperative radiographic measurements of glenoid anatomy and relationships in patients with total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Radiographic imaging is the follow-up imaging modality most widely used for patients who have undergone total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, its accuracy of measurement of component position has not been validated against a gold standard in a clinical series.

METHODS

Thirty-two x-ray images and computed tomography scans were taken within 1 month of each other in patients who had undergone TSA with an all-polyethylene glenoid component. The humeral glenoid alignment in the coronal superior-inferior (SI) plane (HGA-SI), humeral glenoid alignment in the axial anterior-posterior (AP) plane (HGA-AP), and humeral scapular alignment in the axial plane (HSA-AP) were measured with 21 pairs of images, and glenoid component retroversion was measured with all 32 pairs. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for HGA-SI, HGA-AP, HSA-AP, and version, and accuracy analysis criteria of the radiographs were assessed using predetermined criterion.

RESULTS

We found fair-moderate agreement between x-ray images and CT scans for HGA-SI (ICC = 0.42) and version (ICC = 0.69), but poor agreement for HGA-AP (ICC = 0.04) and HSA-AP (ICC = 0.38). An average difference of overestimating HGA-SI by 0.06% ± 7.7%, with a precision 95% confidence interval of 7.6%, and overestimating version by -4.2° ± 5.1°, with a precision 95% confidence interval of 9.9°, was found.

CONCLUSION

This validation study has defined the ability and limitation for these measurements using high-quality axillary and AP radiographs.

Computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry for assessing the density distribution of subchondral bone as a measure of long-term mechanical stress in the "rugby shoulder"

BACKGROUND

Rugby is a collision sport with a high risk of shoulder injury. Although traumatic anterior shoulder instability is common, the long-term effects of rugby and joint instability on the shoulder have not been described; thus, this study assessed the effects of rugby itself, and joint instability, on the glenoid cavity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both sides of the shoulders from 25 rugby players and 17 control patients with unilateral shoulder instability were prospectively evaluated by means of computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry, which represents the distribution of mineralization in subchondral bone plate (DMSB) as a marker of the long-term loading history of a joint. For the quantitative analysis, intergroup differences of maximum Hounsfield unit (HU) values in 7 areas on the glenoid were assessed in the uninjured intact shoulder to characterize the influence of rugby. Side-to-side differences of the HUs in each area were assessed in each participant to characterize the effects of shoulder instability. For the qualitative analysis, associations between the patterns of each DMSB and each group were assessed by means of correspondence analysis.

RESULTS

All examined areas on the glenoid had a significantly higher HUs in rugby players. Shoulder instability affected the HUs in both groups. A qualitative analysis demonstrated that the maximum HU tended to be shifted more inferiorly in rugby players and in the unstable shoulders.

CONCLUSIONS

Rugby affects the shoulder joint, regardless of any history of instability, suggesting that "rugby shoulder" tends to involve degenerative changes, such as osteoarthritis or labral tears.

Incidence of early radiolucent lines after glenoid component insertion for total shoulder arthroplasty: a radiographic study comparing pressurized and unpressurized cementing techniques

BACKGROUND

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is commonly performed for arthritic conditions of the shoulder. The outcome after TSA is generally good, but there are several modes of failure, with one of the more common reasons being glenoid loosening. One possible cause for glenoid loosening is inadequate cementation technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of lucent lines on the first postoperative radiograph using 2 different cementation techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients had a pegged glenoid placed with 1 of 2 different cementation techniques. In 26 consecutive patients, the pegged glenoid component was cemented with a traditional minimal manual pressurization technique, whereas 74 underwent a contemporary 3-step pressurization cementation technique before implant insertion. The first postoperative radiograph was evaluated using the system of Lazarus et al, looking at the frequency of lucent lines. The radiographs were deidentified and were randomized and evaluated by 2 independent observers on 3 separate occasions.

RESULTS

The Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences between grades of radiolucent lines for pressurized versus unpressurized cementation techniques. There were significantly (P < .05) fewer lucent lines identified in the group that underwent contemporary 3-step pressurization as opposed to the group that underwent minimal manual pressurization. Intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability with Cronbach α coefficients were good.

CONCLUSION

The 3-step pressurized cementation technique resulted in a low incidence of radiolucent lines around the glenoid implant in patients undergoing TSA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, Prospective Cohort, Treatment Study.

The early migration of a partially cemented fluted pegged glenoid component using radiostereometric analysis

BACKGROUND

Radiostereometric analysis measures the position of rigid bodies in 3 dimensions with very high precision and can be used to measure early micromotion of glenoid implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiostereometric analysis was used to measure migration of 11 partially cemented fluted pegged glenoid components in patients with osteoarthritis who underwent shoulder arthroplasty during a 2-year period. Patients were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant scores and by a computed tomography (CT) scan at the 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Migration patterns could be classified into 2 groups: The first group showed little if any migration, the second group rotated by 4° or more as early as 3 months after operation. The maximum total point motion reached up to 2 mm by the 6-month follow-up. At 12 months, the 2 groups could be identified by the presence or absence of focal lucency around the central peg. At the end of 2 years, CT scans were able to classify the same 2 migration patterns by the presence or absence of osseointegration around the cementless central peg of the glenoid implant. The clinical effect of the absence of osseointegration in this novel glenoid component is unknown because both groups had similar clinical results at 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Rapid early migration associated with focal lucency and absence of osseointegration was observed in 6 of 11 components. We postulate that lack of initial fixation leads to early movement of the glenoid component and failure of osseointegration.

Correlation between mineralization and mechanical strength of the subchondral bone plate of the humeral head

BACKGROUND

One of the main problems in shoulder arthroplasty is the fixation of the prosthesis, where the subchondral bone plate plays an important role. Subchondral mineralization patterns represent the loading history of a joint and give information about the individual biomechanical situation. The objective of this study was to determine if a correlation between subchondral mineralization and mechanical strength in the humeral head exists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subchondral mineralization of 32 shoulder specimens was investigated by use of computed tomography (CT) osteoabsorptiometry. The previously dissected specimens were scanned axially in a CT scanner, and the obtained data sets were transferred into an image analyzing system. Maximum intensity projection was used to evaluate the density distribution of the subchondral bone plate. To get information about mechanical strength of the subchondral bone, each specimen was investigated at 29 predefined points by means of an indentation-testing machine.

RESULTS

The maximum strength was mostly detected in the center (monocentric pattern) or in anterior and posterior areas of the articular surface (bicentric pattern). The distribution of mineralization showed the same 2 reproducible patterns. The coefficient of correlation between mechanical strength and mineralization shown on CT was between 0.59 and 0.96. The obtained information was statistically significant (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Mechanical strength and subchondral mineralization in the humeral head are significantly associated (P < .01). As a consequence of these findings, CT osteoabsorptiometry can be indirectly used to give information about bone quality in vivo. Our findings could be useful for the development of new fixation methods in shoulder surgery (eg, humeral resurfacing arthroplasty).

Joint mechanics measurement using magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging-based methods for measuring the mechanics of human joints have been successfully applied to quantitatively evaluate biomechanics in a wide variety of joints, pathologies, and interventions. The objective of this review was to provide a detailed overview of methods in the literature for measuring joint kinematics, meniscal and ligament movement, and cartilage strain using MRI.

A radiographic classification of massive rotator cuff tear arthritis

BACKGROUND

In 1990, Hamada et al. radiographically classified massive rotator cuff tears into five grades. Walch et al. subsequently subdivided Grade 4 to reflect the presence/absence of subacromial arthritis and emphasize glenohumeral arthritis as a characteristic of Grade 4.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore determined (1) whether patient characteristics and MRI findings differed between the grades at initial examination and final followup; (2) which factors affected progression to a higher grade; (3) whether the retear rate of repaired tendons differed among the grades; and (4) whether the radiographic grades at final followup differed from those at initial examination among patients treated operatively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 75 patients with massive rotator cuff tears. Thirty-four patients were treated nonoperatively and 41 operatively.

RESULTS

Patients with Grade 3, 4, or 5 tears had a higher incidence of fatty muscle degeneration of the subscapularis muscle than patients with Grade 1 or 2 tears. In 26 patients with Grade 1 or 2 tears at initial examination, duration of followup was longer in patients who remained at Grade 1 or 2 than in those who progressed to Grade 3, 4, or 5 at final followup. The retear rate of repaired supraspinatus tendon was more frequent in Grade 2 than Grade 1 tears. In operated cases, radiographic grades at final followup did not develop to Grades 3 to 5.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe cuff repair should be performed before acromiohumeral interval narrowing. Our observations are consistent with the temporal concepts of massive cuff tear pathomechanics proposed by Burkhart and Hansen et al.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A quantitative method for determining medial migration of the humeral head after shoulder arthroplasty: preliminary results in assessing glenoid wear at a minimum of two years after hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming

HYPOTHESIS

Glenoid erosion and medial migration of the humeral head prosthesis have been observed after most types of shoulder arthroplasty. A method of measuring the change in humeral head position with time after shoulder prosthetic arthroplasty was applied it to 14 shoulders that underwent humeral hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming. We hypothesized that the measurement technique would be reproducible and that the rate of wear would be small in the series of shoulders studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Standardized anteroposterior and axillary radiographs were obtained after surgery. Two examiners measured the position of the humeral head center in relation to scapular reference coordinates for the anteroposterior and axillary projections and plotted these values against time after surgery. The change in position was characterized as the slope of this plot. Shoulders were included if there were at least 3 sets of postoperative films, the last being at least 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

The slopes measured by the 2 examiners agreed within 0.5 mm/y for the anteroposterior and the axillary projections. For the series of shoulder arthroplasties, the rate of movement of the head center toward the scapula was less than 0.4 mm/y for either examiner in either projection.

DISCUSSION

Medial migration is a concern after any type of shoulder arthroplasty, whether a hemiarthroplasty, a biological interpositional arthroplasty, or a total shoulder arthroplasty. Quantifying the rate of medial migration over time after shoulder arthroplasty is an important element of clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This is an inexpensive, practical, and reproducible method that can be used to determine the rate of medial migration of the humeral head on plain radiographs after shoulder arthroplasty. The average rate of medial migration in the shoulders in this study was small.

Total shoulder replacement in rheumatoid disease

We describe the longer term clinical and radiological findings in a prospectively followed series of 49 rheumatoid patients (58 shoulders) who had undergone Neer II total shoulder replacement. The early and intermediate results have been published previously.

At a mean follow-up of 19.8 years (16.5 to 23.8) 14 shoulders survived. Proximal migration of the humeral component was associated with progressive loosening of the glenoid and humeral components, but was independent of the state of the rotator cuff at the time of operation. Despite these changes the range of movement was preserved. Most patients had little or no pain in the shoulder, could sleep undisturbed and could attend to personal hygiene and grooming.