Glenoid morphology rather than version predicts humeral subluxation: a different perspective on the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty

Three-dimensional evaluation of the transverse rotator cuff muscle's resultant force angle in relation to scapulohumeral subluxation and glenoid vault morphology in nonpathological shoulders

BACKGROUND

Static posterior subluxation of the humeral head (SPSH) results in glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Treatment strategies for SPSH with or without resulting osteoarthritis remain challenging. There is growing interest in evaluating the rotator cuff muscle volume, fatty infiltration, or forces in osteoarthritic shoulders with SPSH, mainly due to a possible transverse force imbalance. In nonpathological shoulders, the transverse angle of the rotator cuff muscle's resultant force may be associated with scapulohumeral alignment and glenoid vault morphology, despite an assumed transverse force balance. The purpose of this study was to assess the transverse rotator cuff muscle's resultant force angle (TRFA) and its relationship with the scapulohumeral subluxation index (SHSI) and selected glenoid vault parameters using computer modeling.

METHODS

Computed tomography scans of 55 trauma patients (age 31 ± 13 years, 36 males) with nonpathological shoulders were analyzed and all measurements performed in 3-dimension. We placed landmarks manually to determine the humeral head center and the rotator cuff tendon footprints. The contours of the rotator cuff muscle cross-sectional areas were automatically predicted in a plane perpendicular to the scapula. Each rotator cuff muscle was divided into virtual vector fibers with homogeneous density. The resultant force vector direction for each muscle, corresponding to the rotator cuff action line, was calculated by vectorially summing the normalized fiber vectors for each muscle, weighted by the muscle trophic ratio. The resultant force vector was projected on the axial plane, and its angle with the mediolateral scapular axis was used to determine TRFA. The SHSI according to Walch, glenoid version angle (GVA), glenoid anteroposterior offset angle (GOA), glenoid depth, glenoid width, and glenoid radius were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean values for TRFA, SHSI, GVA, GOA, glenoid depth, glenoid width, and glenoid radius were 7.4 ± 4.5°, 54.3 ± 4.8%, -4.1 ± 4.4°, 5.1 ± 10.8°, 3.3 ± 0.6 mm, 20 ± 2 mm, and 33.6 ± 4.6 mm, respectively. The TRFA correlated strongly with SHSI (R = 0.731, P < .001) and GVA (R = 0.716, P < .001) and moderately with GOA (R = 0.663, P < .001). The SHSI was strongly negatively correlated with GVA (R = -0.813, P < .001) and moderately with GOA (R = -0.552, P < .001). The GVA correlated strongly with GOA (R = 0.768, P < .001). In contrast, TRFA, SHSI, GVA, and GOA did not correlate with glenoid depth, width, or radius.

CONCLUSION

Despite an assumed balance in the transverse volume of the rotator cuff muscles in nonpathological shoulders, variations exist regarding the transverse resultant force depending on the SHSI, GVA, and GOA. In healthy/nonosteoarthritic shoulders, an increased glenoid retroversion is associated with a decreased anterior glenoid offset.

Differences in Osseous Shoulder Morphology, Scapulothoracic Orientation, and Muscle Volume in Patients With Constitutional Static Posterior Shoulder Instability (Type C1) Compared With Healthy Controls

BACKGROUND

Constitutional static posterior humeral decentering (type C1 according to ABC Classification) has been recognized as a pre-osteoarthritic deformity that may lead to early-onset posterior decentering osteoarthritis at a young age. Therefore, it is important to identify possible associations of this pathologic shoulder condition to find more effective treatment options.

PURPOSE

To perform a comprehensive analysis of all parameters reported to be associated with a C1 shoulder-including the osseous shoulder morphology, scapulothoracic orientation, and the muscle volume of the shoulder girdle in a single patient cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective, comparative study was conducted analyzing 17 C1 shoulders in 10 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the complete depiction of the trunk from the base of the skull to the iliac crest, including both humeri. The mean age of the patients was 33.5 years, and all patients were men. To measure and compare the osseous shoulder morphology (glenoid version, glenoid offset, humeral torsion, anterior acromial coverage, posterior acromial coverage, posterior acromial height, and posterior acromial tilt) and scapulothoracic orientation (scapular protraction, scapular internal rotation, scapular upward rotation, scapular translation, scapular tilt, and thoracic kyphosis), these patients were matched 1 to 4 according their age, sex, and affected side with shoulder-healthy patients who had received positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography. To measure and compare the muscle volume of the shoulder girdle (subscapularis, infraspinatus/teres minor, supraspinatus, trapezius, deltoid, latissimus dorsi/teres major, pectoralis major, and pectoralis minor), patients were matched 1 to 2 with patients who had received PET-MRI. Patients with visible pathologies of the upper extremities were excluded.

RESULTS

The C1 group had a significantly higher glenoid retroversion, increased anterior glenoid offset, reduced humeral retrotorsion, increased anterior acromial coverage, reduced posterior acromial coverage, increased posterior acromial height, and increased posterior acromial tilt compared with controls (P < .05). Decreased humeral retrotorsion showed significant correlation with higher glenoid retroversion (r = -0.742; P < .001) and higher anterior glenoid offset (r = -0.757; P < .001). Significant differences were found regarding less scapular upward rotation, less scapular tilt, and less thoracic kyphosis in the C1 group (P < .05). The muscle volume of the trapezius and deltoid was significantly higher in the C1 group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with C1 shoulders differ from healthy controls regarding osseous scapular and humeral morphology, scapulothoracic orientation, and shoulder girdle muscle distribution. These differences may be crucial in understanding the delicate balance of glenohumeral centering.

Hemiarthroplasty versus total shoulder arthroplasty in B2 glenoids with an intact rotator cuff: a long-term matched cohort analysis

Background

Walch B2 glenoids present unique challenges to the shoulder arthroplasty surgeon, particularly in young, active patients who may wish to avoid the restrictions typically associated with an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Long-term data are limited when comparing hemiarthroplasty (HA) and TSA for patients with an intact rotator cuff. The purpose of our study was to compare the long-term outcomes of HA vs. TSA in a matched analysis of patients with B2 glenoids, primary osteoarthritis (OA), and an intact rotator cuff.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent HA or TSA between January 2000 and December 2011 at a single institution. Inclusion criteria were primary OA, Walch B2 glenoid morphology, an intact rotator cuff intraoperatively, at least 2 years of clinical follow-up, or revision within 2 years of surgery. Fifteen HAs met inclusion criteria and were matched 1:2 with 30 TSAs using age, sex, body mass index, and implant selection. Clinical outcomes including range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, subjective shoulder value score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, complications, and revisions were recorded. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed to assess for stem loosening, humeral head subluxation, glenoid loosening, and glenoid erosion.

Results

A total of 15 HAs and 30 TSAs met inclusion criteria at a mean follow-up of 9.3 years. The mean age at the time of surgery was 60.2 years for HA and 65.4 years for TSA (P = .08). Both cohorts had significant improvements in ROM, subjective shoulder value, and VAS pain scores (P < .001). TSA had higher postoperative ASES scores compared to HA (P = .03) and lower postoperative VAS pain scores (P = .03), although the decrease in pain from preoperatively to final follow-up was not significantly different between HA and TSA (P = .11). HAs were more likely to have posterior humeral subluxation (P < .001) and stem lucencies (P = .02). Revisions occurred in 11.1% of the cohort with no difference for HA and TSA (P = .73).

Conclusions

At nearly 10 years of follow-up, HA and TSA both showed significant improvements in ROM and pain when performed for primary glenohumeral OA in B2 glenoids with intact rotator cuffs. Compared to HA, TSAs had less posterior humeral subluxation, less stem lucencies, higher ASES scores, and lower postoperative VAS pain scores. However, our study failed to demonstrate a difference in ROM, complication, or revision rates between HA and TSA.

The role of the anterior shoulder joint capsule in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis

The pathogenesis of primary glenohumeral arthritis (GHOA) is mediated by a complex interaction between osseous anatomy and the surrounding soft tissues. Recently, there has been growing interest in characterizing the association between the anterior shoulder joint capsule and primary GHOA because of the potential for targeted treatment interventions. Emerging evidence has shown substantial synovitis, fibrosis, and mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate in the anterior capsule of osteoarthritic shoulders. In addition, increased thickening of the anterior shoulder joint capsule has been associated with greater posterior glenoid wear and humeral head subluxation. While these findings suggest that anterior capsular disease may play a causative role in the etiology and progression of eccentric GHOA, further studies are needed to support this association. The purpose of this article is to review the pathogenesis of primary GHOA, contextualize current hypotheses regarding the role of the anterior capsule in the disease process, and provide directions for future research.

Quantitative statistical shape model-based analysis of humeral head migration, Part 2: Shoulder osteoarthritis

We wanted to investigate the quantitative characteristics of humeral head migration (HHM) in shoulder osteoarthritis (OA) and their possible associations with scapular morphology. We quantified CT-scan-based-HHM in 122 patients with a combination of automated 3D scapulohumeral migration (=HHM with respect to the scapula) and glenohumeral migration (=HHM with respect to the glenoid) measurements. We divided OA patients in Group 1 (without HHM), Group 2a (anterior HHM) and Group 2b (posterior HHM). We reconstructed and measured the prearthropathy scapular anatomy with a statistical shape model technique. HHM primarily occurs in the axial plane in shoulder OA. We found "not-perfect" correlation between subluxation distance AP and scapulohumeral migration values (r_s  = 0.8, p < 0.001). Group 2b patients had a more expressed prearthropathy glenoid retroversion (13° vs. 7°, p < 0.001) and posterior glenoid translation (4 mm vs. 6 mm, p = 0.003) in comparison to Group 1. Binary logistic regression analysis indicated prearthropathy glenoid version as a significant predictor of HHM (χ² = 27, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the pathologic version could explain 56% of subluxation distance-AP variance and 75% of the scapulohumeral migration variance (all p < 0.001). Herewith, every degree increase in pathologic glenoid retroversion was associated with an increase of 1% subluxation distance-AP, and scapulohumeral migration. The occurrence of posterior HHM is associated with prearthropathy glenoid retroversion and more posterior glenoid translation. The reported regression values of HHM in the function of the pathologic glenoid version could form a basis toward a more patient-specific correction of HHM.

Patient-specific risk profile associated with early-onset primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder: is it really primary?

INTRODUCTION

Although age is considered to be the major risk factor of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GOA), younger population may suffer from degenerative changes of the shoulder joint without evidence of any leading cause. The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk profile in young patients suffering from presumably primary GOA.

METHODS

A consecutive group of 47 patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty for early-onset GOA below the age of 60 years at time of surgery was retrospectively identified and prospectively evaluated. Patients with identifiable cause for GOA (secondary GOA) were excluded. The resulting 32 patients (mean age 52 ± 7 years; 17 male, 15 female) with primary GOA were matched by age (± 3 years) and gender to 32 healthy controls (mean age 53 ± 7 years; 17 male, 15 female). Demographic data and patient-related risk factors were assessed and compared among both groups to identify extrinsic risk factors for primary GOA. Patients were further subdivided into a group with concentric GOA (group A) and a group with eccentric GOA (group B) to perform a subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Patients had a significantly higher BMI (p = 0.017), were more likely to be smokers (p < 0.001) and to have systematic diseases such as hypertension (p = 0.007) and polyarthritis (p < 0.001) and a higher Shoulder Activity Level (SAL) (p < 0.001) when compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, group B had a significantly higher SAL not only compared to healthy controls but also to group A, including activities such as combat sport (p = 0.048) and weightlifting (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Several patient-specific risk factors are associated with primary GOA in the young population, as well as highly shoulder demanding activities in the development of eccentric GOA. Consequently, a subset of young patients with eccentric primary GOA could in reality be secondary due to a muscular imbalance between internal and external rotators caused by improper weight training.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Case-Control study.

Radiologic midterm results of cemented and uncemented glenoid components in primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder: a matched pair analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components are considered the gold standard in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. New designs of cementless metal backed glenoid components showed promising early and midterm results. The aim of this matched-pair analysis was to compare the radiologic results of two cemented glenoid components and a cementless glenoid component in patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Sixty shoulders were clinically and radiologically evaluated after a mean follow-up of 59 months. Mean patient age was 70.4 years at surgery. Based on the design of the glenoid component (keel, peg, MB), 3 groups with, respectively, 20 shoulders were formed according to the matching criteria time of follow-up, patient age and gender. RLL and osteolysis in anteroposterior and axillary X-ray images were quantified and combined in a radiologic score (R-Score). Higher scores expressed worse radiologic outcomes. Further radiological parameters such as lateral glenohumeral offset (LGHO) and subluxation index were measured according to Walch. The functional results were documented using the age and gender normalized Constant-Murley score.

RESULTS

Postoperative R-Score was highest in pegged components (peg: 5.7, keel: 2.4, MB: 1.6; p < 0.001) when combining both radiographs and after separate analysis of anteroposterior radiographs. MB glenoids had the lowest R-score in axillary radiographs (peg: 2.2, keel: 1.4, MB: 0.6; MB vs. keel: p = 0.004, MB vs peg: p < 0.001). RLL were more common (p = 0.004) and severe (p = 0.005) in pegged glenoids (RLL incidence: 77.8%, RLL-score: 2.5) than in MB glenoids (RLL incidence: 30%, RLL-score 0.7) and tended (p = 0.084) to have a higher RLL-score than keeled glenoids (RLL incidence: 63.2%, RLL-score:1.4). Both the osteolysis score (keel vs. peg: p < 0.001, MB vs. peg p < 0.001) and the incidence of osteolysis (keel vs. peg: p = 0.008, MB vs peg: p = 0.003) were significant higher in pegged glenoids (peg: osteolysis score: 3.2, osteolysis incidence: 100%; keel: osteolysis score: 1.0, osteolysis incidence: 63.2%, MB: osteolysis score: 0.9, osteolysis incidence: 60%), while the osteolysis score in axillary images was lowest for MB glenoids (peg: 1.2, keel: 0.9, MB: 0.4; peg vs. MB: p = 0.009, keel vs. MB: p = 0.047). Osteolysis in the central axillary zone was least common in MB glenoids (peg: 50%, keel: 47.4%, MB: 15%; peg vs. MB p = 0.035, keel vs. MB p = 0.041). LGHO was highest in MB glenoids (peg: 54.1, keel: 54.5, MB: 57.8; p < 0.001) but did not increase radiographic loosening (r = 0.007; p = 0.958). Preoperative posterior humeral head subluxation seemed to affect incidence of RLL negatively (pre-op posterior decentered 64.3%, pre-op centered 31.9%; p = 0.201) but did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Pegged glenoid components had a concerning rate of RLL and osteolysis. MB glenoid components had a better outcome in axillary radiographs concerning RLL and osteolysis. Increased LGHO did not increase radiographic loosening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comperative treatment study Level III.

Walch B2 glenoids. 2D vs 3D comparison of humeral head subluxation and glenoid retroversion

Background

The posterior subluxation and glenoid version in Walch B2 glenoids are routinely assessed by 2-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT). Different methods of calculation are used to analyze these parameters. Alternatively, the rising use of 3-dimensional (3D) planification tools in arthroplasty requires the clarification if the 3D measurements are equivalent to 2D. The aim of this study was to compare B2 glenoids characteristics between 2D CT assessment method and 3D automated software method.

Methods

CT scans from patients who underwent a shoulder arthroplasty were identified. In the 2D method, measurement of glenoid version was determined. Measurement of the humeral head subluxation (HHS) (scapula axis method) was determined by the percentage of the humeral head posterior to the Friedman line (scapula axis). Three-dimensional analysis allowed an automated segmentation of the humerus and scapula, definition of scapular planes, and determination of glenoid version and HHS.

Results

Fifty-one CT scans met inclusion criteria. The intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the 2D retroversion (RV) and 2D HHS intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient>0.9).The median RV was 16° [12-20] in 2D and 19° [16-23] in 3D (P < .0001). The median subluxation was 71% [66-75] in 2D and 81% [78-86] in 3D (P < .0001). Linear regression analysis demonstrated low positive correlation between RV and subluxation in 2D and 3D (R² = 0.31 and R² = 0.23, respectively).

Discussion/Conclusion

The assessment of version and HHS in Walch B2 glenoids between 2D CT and a 3D planification were significantly different. Low correlation between RV and HHS was observed (2D and 3D assessment).

Long-term results after posterior open glenoid wedge osteotomy for posterior shoulder instability associated with excessive glenoid retroversion

BACKGROUND

Treatment of posterior shoulder instability (PSI) associated with excessive glenoid retroversion is a rare, challenging problem in shoulder surgery. One proposed technique is posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy to correct excessive glenoid retroversion as described by Scott. However, this operation is rarely performed, and limited long-term outcomes using this approach are available. The goal of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes of posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy for PSI associated with excessive glenoid retroversion.

METHODS

Six consecutive patients (7 shoulders) with a mean age of 24 years (range 19-34) were treated with posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy for PSI associated with a glenoid retroversion greater than 15° and followed up clinically and radiographically at a mean age of 15 years (range 10-19).

RESULTS

Recurrent, symptomatic PSI was observed in 6 of 7 shoulders (86%). One necessitated revision with a posterior (iliac crest) bone block procedure and was rated as a failure and excluded from functional analysis. One patient rated his result as excellent, 3 as good, 1 as fair, and 1 as unsatisfactory. Mean relative Constant Score (CS%) was unchanged from preoperation to final follow-up (CS% = 72%) and pain did not significantly decrease (Constant Score = 7-10 points; P = .969). The mean Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) improved postoperatively, but with 6 patients the improvement did not reach statistical significance (SSV = 42%-67%, P = .053) and the total Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index averaged 30% at the final follow-up. Mean glenoid retroversion of all 7 shoulders was corrected from 20° (range 16°-26°) to 3° (range -3° to +8°) (P = .018). In the 5 shoulders with preoperative static posterior subluxation of the humeral head, the humeral head was not recentered. All 7 shoulders showed progression of glenoid arthritic changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior open wedge glenoid osteotomy for PSI associated with excessive glenoid retroversion neither reliably restored shoulder stability nor recentered the joint or prevent progression of osteoarthritis. Alternative treatments for PSI associated with excessive glenoid retroversion have to be developed and evaluated.

Subluxation in the Arthritic Shoulder

»

The term "subluxation" means partial separation of the joint surfaces. In the arthritic shoulder, "arthritic glenohumeral subluxation" refers to displacement of the humeral head on the surface of the glenoid.

»

The degree of arthritic glenohumeral subluxation can be measured using radiography with standardized axillary views or computed tomography (CT).

»

Shoulders with a type-B1 or B2 glenoid may show more posterior subluxation on an axillary radiograph that is made with the arm in an elevated position than on a CT scan that is made with the arm at the side.

»

The degree of arthritic glenohumeral subluxation is not closely related to glenoid retroversion.

»

The position of the humeral head with respect to the plane of the scapula is related to glenoid retroversion and is not a measure of glenohumeral subluxation.

»

Studies measuring glenohumeral subluxation before and after arthroplasty should clarify its importance to the clinical outcomes of shoulder reconstruction.

Glenoid vault and humeral head alignment in relation to the scapular blade axis in young patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head

BACKGROUND

Static posterior subluxation of the humeral head is a pre-osteoarthritic deformity preceding posterior erosion in young patients. Its etiology remains unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in scapular morphology between young patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head and healthy controls with a centered humeral head.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head who were treated in our institution between January 2018 and November 2019. Fourteen shoulders in 12 patients were included in this study and then matched according their age, sex, and affected side with controls. Computed tomography images of both groups were compared in the standardized axial imaging plane for differences in scapular morphology. The following parameters were measured: glenoid version relative to the Friedman line and scapular blade axis, scapulohumeral and glenohumeral subluxation index, and neck angle, as well as glenoid and humeral offset.

RESULTS

The patients in the subluxation group showed significantly higher scapulohumeral and glenohumeral subluxation indexes than controls (0.76 vs. 0.55 [P < .0001] and 0.58 vs. 0.51 [P = .016], respectively). The mean measurements of glenoid version according to the Friedman line and relative to the scapular blade axis were significantly higher in the subluxation group than in controls (19° vs. 4° [P < .0001]and 14° vs. 2° [P = .0002], respectively). The glenoid vault was significantly more anteriorly positioned with respect to the scapular blade axis in the subluxation group than in controls (neck angle, 166° vs. 173° [P = .0003]; glenoid offset, 9.2 mm vs. 4.6 mm [P = .0005]). The midpoint of the humeral head showed a posterior offset with respect to the scapular blade axis in the subluxation group, whereas controls had an anteriorly placed midpoint of the humeral head (-2 mm vs. 3.1 mm, P = .01). A higher scapulohumeral subluxation index showed significant correlations with an increased anterior offset of the glenoid vault (increased glenoid offset: r = 0.493, P = .008 and decreased neck angle: r = -0.554, P = .002), a posterior humeral offset (r = -0.775, P < .0001), and excessive glenoid retroversion measured by both methods (Friedman line: r = 0.852, P < .0001; scapular blade axis: r = 0.803, P < .0001). A higher glenohumeral subluxation index also correlated significantly with an increased anterior offset of the glenoid vault (increased glenoid offset: r = 0.403, P = .034; decreased neck angle: r = -0.406, P = .032) and posterior humeral offset (r = -0.502, P = .006).

CONCLUSION

Young patients with pre-osteoarthritic static posterior subluxation of the humeral head have significant constitutional differences in scapular morphology in terms of an increased anterior glenoid offset, excessive glenoid retroversion, and increased posterior humeral offset in relation to the scapular blade compared with healthy matched controls.

Three-Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of Penetrative Depth and Size of Nonarthritic and Degenerative Arthritic Glenoids: Implications for Glenoid Replacement in Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background

Shoulder arthroplasty is technically demanding and relies heavily on the precision of surgical techniques. Proper glenoid component sizing plays a crucial role in successful shoulder arthroplasty. We measured the size and penetrative depth of the glenoid for peg or screw fixation in nonarthritic and degenerative arthritic shoulders by using three-dimensional computed tomography to determine the reference dimensions of the glenoid in nonarthritic and degenerative arthritic shoulders.

Methods

From January 2010 to January 2011, data on two groups of patients were collected and reviewed. Group 1 comprised 38 patients who underwent surgical treatment due to fracture of the proximal humerus and who had no evidence of a pathological glenoid. Group 2 comprised 14 patients who underwent surgical treatment due to osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint. The height (maximal superoinferior diameter) of the glenoid was measured, and the width (anteroposterior [AP] diameter) of the glenoid was measured at five different levels (H1–H5). Axial images were taken at H1–H5 levels, the AP glenoid diameter of each was divided into eight areas, and division points were labeled as W1–W7. The penetrative depths between the near cortex and far cortex of the glenoid (thickness) at each point (W1–W7) were measured.

Results

The overall mean glenoid height was 37.67 ± 4.09 mm in nonarthritic glenoids and 39.42 ± 3.54 mm in degenerative arthritic glenoids. The nonarthritic glenoid was significantly thicker than the degenerative arthritic glenoid at the H1W3, H1W4, H1W5, H2W7, H3W1, H3W6, H3W7, H4W5, H4W6, H4W7, H5W4, H5W5, H5W6, and H5W7 points. The posteroinferior quadrant had the smallest penetrative depth in both nonarthritic and degenerative arthritic glenoids. Also, the degenerative arthritic glenoids were significantly thinner than the nonarthritic glenoids along the posterior and inferior parts of the glenoid.

Conclusions

The posterior and inferior parts of the degenerative arthritic glenoid appears thinner than the nonarthritic glenoid. Thus, caution has to be taken when drilling the screw hole or inserting screws into the posteroinferior parts, where the glenoid is thinner than 15 mm on average, to avoid penetration of the far cortex.

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of glenoid bone stock and glenoid version: inter-reader analysis and correlation with rotator cuff tendinopathy and atrophy in patients with shoulder osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

Glenoid bone stock and morphology and rotator cuff muscle quality and tendon integrity affect the outcome of total shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesized that glenoid bone loss correlates with rotator cuff muscle fatty infiltration (FI), tendinopathy, and atrophy.

DESIGN

Forty-three 3D CT scans and MRIs of 43 patients (mean age 62 years; SD 13 years; range 22-77 years) referred for primary shoulder pain were evaluated. Measurements of glenoid bone stock, version, and posterior humeral subluxation index (HSI) were assessed on an axial CT image reconstructed in the true scapular plane. Measurements utilized the Friedman line to approximate the pre-pathologic surface. Glenoid morphology was assigned by modified Walch classification. Rotator cuff FI, atrophy, and tendon integrity were assessed on corresponding MRIs.

RESULTS

There was a very strong negative correlation between increasing glenoid version and HSI (r = - 0.908; p < 0.0001). There was a moderately negative correlation between anterior bone loss and HSI (r = - 0.562; p < 0.0001) and a moderately positive correlation between posterior bone loss and HSI (r = 0.555; p < 0.0001). Subscapularis muscle FI correlated moderately with increased anterior and central bone loss and increased humeral head medialization (r = 0.512, p = 0.0294; r = 0.479, p = 0.033; r = 0.494, p = 0.0294; respectively). Inter-observer reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] and kappa) was good to excellent for all measurements and grading.

CONCLUSION

Glenoid anteversion and anterior and posterior bone loss are associated with varying HSI. Subscapularis muscle FI, not tendon integrity, correlates to anterior and central glenoid erosion. The study adds evidence that neither rotator cuff tendinopathy nor muscle atrophy exhibits a significant relationship to HSI.

Correction to: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of glenoid bone stock and glenoid version: inter-reader analysis and correlation with rotator cuff tendinopathy and atrophy in patients with shoulder osteoarthritis

Purpose Glenoid bone stock and morphology and rotator cuff muscle quality and tendon integrity affect the outcome of total shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesized that glenoid bone loss correlates with rotator cuff muscle fatty infiltration (FI), tendinopathy, and atrophy.Design Forty-three 3-D CT scans and MRIs of 43 patients (mean age 62 years; SD 13 years; range 22-77 years) referred for primary shoulder pain were evaluated. Measurements of glenoid bone stock, version, and posterior humeral subluxation index (HSI) were assessed on an axial CT image reconstructed in the true scapular plane. Measurements utilized the Friedman line to approximate the pre-pathologic surface. Glenoid morphology was assigned by modified Walch classification. Rotator cuff FI, atrophy, and tendon integrity were assessed on corresponding MRIs.Results There was a very strong negative correlation between increasing glenoid version and HSI (r = - 0.908; p < 0.0001). There was a moderately negative correlation between anterior bone loss and HSI (r = - 0.562; p < 0.0001) and a moderately positive correlation between posterior bone loss and HSI (r = 0.555; p < 0.0001). Subscapularis muscle FI correlated moderately with increased anterior and central bone loss and increased humeral head medialization (r = 0.512, p = 0.0294; r = 0.479, p = 0.033; r = 0.494, p = 0.0294, respectively). Inter-observer reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] and kappa) was good to excellent for all measurements and grading.Conclusion Glenoid anteversion and anterior and posterior bone loss are associated with varying HSI. Subscapularis muscle FI, not tendon integrity, correlates to anterior and central glenoid erosion. The study adds evidence that neither rotator cuff tendinopathy nor muscle atrophy exhibits a significant relationship to HSI.

Association Between Rotator Cuff Muscle Size and Glenoid Deformity in Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Although glenoid morphology has been associated with fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff in arthritic shoulders, the association of rotator cuff muscle area with specific patterns of glenoid wear has not been studied. The purpose of our study was to assess the associations of glenoid deformity in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis and rotator cuff muscle area.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 370 computed tomographic (CT) scans of osteoarthritic shoulders was performed. Glenoid deformity according to the modified Walch classification was determined, and retroversion, inclination, and humeral-head subluxation were calculated using automated 3-dimensional software. Rotator cuff muscle area was measured on sagittal CT scan reconstructions. A ratio of the area of the posterior rotator cuff muscles to the subscapularis was calculated to approximate axial plane potential force imbalance. Univariate and multivariate analyses to determine associations with glenoid bone deformity and rotator cuff measurements were performed.

RESULTS

Patient age and sex were significantly related to cuff muscle area across glenoid types. Multivariate analysis did not find significant differences in individual rotator cuff cross-sectional areas across glenoid types, with the exception of a larger supraspinatus area in Type-B2 glenoids compared with Type-A glenoids (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; p = 0.04). An increased ratio of the posterior cuff area to the subscapularis area was associated with increased odds of a Type-B2 deformity (OR, 1.3; p = 0.002). Similarly, an increase in this ratio was significantly associated with increased glenoid retroversion (beta = 0.92; p = 0.01) and humeral-head subluxation (beta = 1.48; p = 0.001). Within the Type-B glenoids, only posterior humeral subluxation was related to the ratio of the posterior cuff to the subscapularis (beta = 1.15; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Age and sex are significantly associated with cuff muscle area in arthritic shoulders. Asymmetric glenoid wear and humeral-head subluxation in osteoarthritis are associated with asymmetric atrophy within the rotator cuff transverse plane. Increased posterior rotator cuff muscle area compared with anterior rotator cuff muscle area is associated with greater posterior glenoid wear and subluxation. It is unclear if the results are causative or associative; further research is required to clarify the relationship.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Management of the B2 Glenoid in Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

The Walch B2 glenoid is characterized by a biconcave glenoid deformity, acquired glenoid retroversion, and posterior humeral head subluxation. Surgical reconstruction of the B2 glenoid remains a challenge. Surgical management options include arthroscopic debridement, hemiarthroplasty, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with eccentric reaming, bone grafting or augmented glenoid implants, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Multiple factors dictate the optimal surgical management strategy.. This article describes each of these techniques and presents the current available literature in an effort to guide evidence-based decisions in the surgical management of the B2 glenoid deformity.

The Walch type B humerus: glenoid retroversion is associated with torsional differences in the humerus

BACKGROUND

The Walch type B glenoid has the hallmark features of retroversion, joint subluxation, and bony erosion. Although the type B glenoid has been well described, the morphology of the corresponding type B humerus is poorly understood. As such, the aim of this imaging-based anthropometric study was to investigate humeral torsion in Walch type B shoulders.

METHODS

Three-dimensional models of the full-length humerus were generated from computed tomography data for the Walch type B group (n = 59) and for a control group of normal nonarthritic shoulders (n = 59). An anatomic humeral head-neck plane was created and used to determine humeral torsion relative to the epicondylar axis. Measurements were repeated, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated.

RESULTS

The type B humeri had significantly (P < .001) less retrotorsion (14° ± 9°) than the control group (36° ± 12°) relative to the epicondylar axis. Male and female individuals within the control group showed statistically significant differences in humeral torsion (P = .043), which were not found in the type B group. Inter-rater reliability showed excellent agreement for humeral torsion (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.962). A subgroup analysis between Walch type B2 and B3 shoulders showed no significant differences in any of the humeral or glenoid parameters.

CONCLUSION

The Walch type B humerus has significantly less retrotorsion than non-osteoarthritic shoulders. At present, it is unknown whether the altered humeral retrotorsion is a cause or effect of the type B glenoid. In addition, it is unknown whether surgeons should be reconstructing type B2 humeral component version to pathologic torsion or to nonpathologic population means to optimize arthroplasty survivorship.

Relationship of Posterior Decentering of the Humeral Head with Tear Size and Fatty Degeneration in Rotator Cuff Tear

Background

Posterior decentering is not an uncommon finding on rotator cuff tear patients’ shoulder magnetic resonance imaging. No previous study has reported on the relationship between posterior decentering and rotator cuff tear.

Methods

We assessed patients’ rotator cuff tear humeral head positions based on humeral–scapular alignment (HSA). Subjects were classified into centering and decentering groups based on a <2 mm or >2 mm HSA value, respectively. Differences in rotator cuff tear size, degree of tear, and fatty degeneration between the two groups were evaluated.

Results

One hundred seventy-five patients (80 males, 95 females; mean age: 59.7 ± 6.5 years old) were selected as subjects (case-control study; level of evidence: 3). Tear size, degree of subscapularis tendon tear, and fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis muscles were significantly different between the two groups (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001).

Conclusions

The occurrence of decentering was related to rotator cuff tear size, degree of subscapularis tendon tear, and fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff muscles.

Autografting for B2 Glenoids

The Walch B2 glenoid is characterized by a biconcave glenoid deformity, acquired glenoid retroversion, and posterior subluxation of the humeral head. Surgical reconstruction of the B2 glenoid is often challenging due to the complexity of the deformity. Bone graft augmentation using humeral head autograft is a valuable adjunct to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in the B2 glenoid, particularly in the young, highly active patient with severe glenoid retroversion (>25°–30°). Although this technique affords the ability to correct glenoid version and simultaneously enhances glenoid bone stock, it is technically challenging. The potential for graft-related complications also exists, which may further impact glenoid implant longevity and functional outcome. This review article aims to describe the B2 glenoid morphology, discuss the challenges in managing the B2 deformity, and provide further insight specifically regarding autografting at the time of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for reconstruction of the B2 glenoid.

Different acromial roof morphology in concentric and eccentric osteoarthritis of the shoulder: a multiplane reconstruction analysis of 105 shoulder computed tomography scans

BACKGROUND

The pathomechanisms of eccentric osteoarthritis of the shoulder remain unclear. Although there is increasing evidence of bony differences between shoulders with rotator cuff tears and osteoarthritis, analogous differences have not been identified for primary concentric and eccentric osteoarthritis. This study examined the shape and orientation of the acromial roof as a potential risk factor for the development of posterior glenoid wear.

METHODS

We analyzed computed tomography images of 105 shoulders with primary osteoarthritis. Based on the classification of Walch, 45 shoulders had concentric osteoarthritis (Walch A) and 60 shoulders were affected by eccentric osteoarthritis (Walch B; EOA). A comparison of acromial morphology was performed in a multiplanar reconstruction analysis of computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

Acromial shape: Acromial length, width, and area were not significantly different. Acromial roof orientation: The acromial roof in EOA was an average of 5° flatter (sagittal tilt; P < .01) and 5° more downward tilted (coronal tilt; P < .01). There was no difference in axial rotation (axial tilt; P = .47). Anteroposterior glenoid coverage: The glenoid in EOA was covered an average of 4° less posteriorly (P = .01) and 4° more anteriorly (P = .04). No differences were shown for overall glenoid coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

The acromial roof could play a role in the pathogenesis of EOA. Less posterior support due to a flatter acromion with less posterior glenoid coverage could contribute to static posterior subluxation of the humeral head and posterior glenoid wear. Further biomechanical investigations are needed to confirm these findings.

Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background

To determine the normal range of humeral head positioning on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

We selected normal subjects (64 patients; group A) to study the normal range of humeral head positioning on the glenoid by MRI measurements. To compare the MRI measurement method with the computed tomography (CT), we selected group B (70 patients) who underwent both MRI and CT. We measured the humeral-scapular alignment (HSA) and the humeral-glenoid alignment (HGA).

Results

The HSA in the control group was 1.47 ± 1.05 mm, and the HGA with and without reconstruction were 1.15 ± 0.65 mm and 1.03 ± 0.59 mm, respectively, on MRI. In the test group, HSA was 2.67 ± 1.47 mm and HGA with and without reconstruction was 1.58 ± 1.16 mm and 1.49 ± 1.08 mm, on MRI. On CT, the HSA was 1.72 ± 1.01 mm, and HGA with and without reconstruction were 1.54 ± 0.96 mm and 1.59 ± 0.93 mm, respectively. HSA was significantly different according to image modality (p=0.0006), but HGA was not significantly different regardless of reconstruction (p=0.8836 and 0.9234).

Conclusions

Although additional CT scans can be taken to measure decentering in patients with rotator cuff tears, reliable measurements can be obtained with MRI alone. When using MRI, it is better to use HGA, which is a more reliable measurement value based on the comparison with CT measurement (study design: Study of Diagnostic Test; Level of evidence II).

Treatment of Articular Cartilage Injuries in the Glenohumeral Joint

Articular cartilage injuries in the glenohumeral joint present a unique and difficult problem for the patient and surgeon alike. Various etiologies exist for the development of these cartilage lesions; therefore, treatment options are vast and must be chosen thoughtfully, especially in the young, active patient. Across all treatment modalities, the goal is for the patient to regain lasting function and mobility while decreasing pain.

Automated Three-Dimensional Measurement of Glenoid Version and Inclination in Arthritic Shoulders

BACKGROUND

Preoperative computed tomography (CT) measurements of glenoid version and inclination are recommended for planning glenoid implantation in shoulder arthroplasty. However, current manual or semi-automated 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) methods are user-dependent and time-consuming. We assessed whether the use of a 3D automated method is accurate and reliable to measure glenoid version and inclination in osteoarthritic shoulders.

METHODS

CT scans of osteoarthritic shoulders of 60 patients scheduled for shoulder arthroplasty were obtained. Automated, surgeon-operated, image analysis software (Glenosys; Imascap) was developed to measure glenoid version and inclination. The anatomic scapular reference planes were defined as the mean of the peripheral points of the scapular body as well as the plane perpendicular to it, passing along the supraspinatus fossa line. Measurements were compared with those obtained using previously described manual or semi-automated methods, including the Friedman version angle on 2D CTs, Friedman method on 3D multiplanar reconstructions (corrected Friedman method), Ganapathi-Iannotti and Lewis-Armstrong methods on 3D volumetric reconstructions (for glenoid version), and Maurer method (for glenoid inclination).The mean differences (and standard deviation) and the concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) were calculated. Two orthopaedic surgeons independently examined the images for the interobserver analysis, with one of them measuring them twice more for the intraobserver analysis; interobserver and intraobserver reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

RESULTS

The mean difference in the Glenosys glenoid version measurement was 2.0° ± 4.5° (CCC = 0.93) compared with the Friedman method, 2.5° ± 3.2° (CCC = 0.95) compared with the corrected Friedman method, 1.5° ± 4.5° (CCC = 0.94) compared with the Ganapathi-Iannotti method, and 1.8° ± 3.8° (CCC = 0.95) compared with the Lewis-Armstrong method. There was a mean difference of 0.2° ± 4.7° (CCC = 0.78) between the inclination measurements made with the Glenosys and Maurer methods. The difference between the overall average 2D and 3D measurements was not significant (p = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of fully automated software for 3D measurement of glenoid version and inclination in arthritic shoulders is reliable and accurate, showing excellent correlation with previously described manual or semi-automated methods.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of automated surgeon-operated image analysis software to evaluate 3D glenoid anatomy eliminates interobserver and intraobserver discrepancies, improves the accuracy of preoperative planning for shoulder replacement, and offers a potential gain of time for the surgeon.

Walch B0 glenoid: pre-osteoarthritic posterior subluxation of the humeral head

The management of primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder has been well investigated. However, the etiology and management of posterior humeral head subluxation in the context of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis remain controversial. The finding of static posterior subluxation of the humeral head before the development of posterior bone erosion of the glenoid in young men with radiographic findings of primary osteoarthritis has been described as arthrogenic posterior subluxation of the humeral head. It demonstrates the earliest form of the osteoarthritic evolution, and an excessive glenoid retroversion is the only probable cause of this static subluxation, although this is controversial. The clinical relevance of these findings is important in allowing the identification of patients at risk for development of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and in developing an early treatment for the subluxation to try to alter the natural course of this disease. The aim of our summary paper was to review the current literature on this matter in an attempt to better understand the pathophysiologic mechanism of this condition, which we named pre-osteoarthritic posterior subluxation of the humeral head, or Walch B-zero (B0) glenoid. It appears that Walch B0 glenoid is a pathologic condition (initially dynamic, eventually evolving into a static condition) that may lead to posterior erosion of the glenoid, taking place once there is asymmetric increased posterior glenohumeral contact forces and possibly associated with increased glenoid retroversion.

Posterior open wedge osteotomy of the scapula neck for the treatment of advanced shoulder osteoarthritis with posterior head migration in young patients

BACKGROUND

Treatment of young, active patients with symptomatic glenohumeral osteoarthritis, excessive glenoid retroversion, and static posterior humeral subluxation is challenging. Correction of glenoid retroversion may lead to centric loading and perhaps recenter the humeral head. We describe the functional and radiologic outcomes after corrective osteotomy of the glenoid in this population of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 10 shoulders (8 patients) that were observed for a mean of 33.4 months (range, 24-52 months) after corrective osteotomy of the glenoid. The mean age at surgery was 41.5 years (range, 24-51 years). On standardized axial images, glenoid retroversion and posterior static humeral subluxation were measured preoperatively and postoperatively and at the final follow-up. At final follow-up, anterior and posterior axial radiographs were performed to determine humeral head position in different arm positions. Clinical follow-up included Constant-Murley score, subjective shoulder value, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The mean Constant-Murley score improved significantly from 45.1 points (range, 24-71) to 64.1 points (range, 44-92; P < .001). The average degree of anterior flexion improved significantly from 117° (range, 50°-160°) to 143° (range, 110°-180°; P = .006). The mean glenoid retroversion changed from 16° (range, 11°-31°) preoperatively to 5° (range, 13° anteversion-16° retroversion; P = .003) at the final follow-up. The mean posterior static subluxation of the humeral head changed from 5 mm (range, 0-10 mm) preoperatively to 6 mm (range, 0-14 mm; P = .259) at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that posterior open wedge osteotomy of the glenoid neck provides excellent correction of glenoid retroversion.

The three-dimensional glenohumeral subluxation index in primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder

BACKGROUND

Assessment of glenohumeral subluxation is essential in preoperative planning of total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a 3-dimensional (3D) glenohumeral subluxation index (GHSI) in shoulders with primary osteoarthritis (OA) and its relationship with morbid glenoid retroversion.

METHODS

The 3D computed tomography reconstructions of 120 healthy shoulders and 110 shoulders with primary glenohumeral arthritis (OA group), classified according to Walch's glenoid morphology, were analyzed. The 3D GHSI was assessed by measuring posterior decentering of the humeral head in relation to the native glenoid in each subject, and its correlation to morbid glenoid version was calculated.

RESULTS

The reproducible 3D GHSI (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.842) showed a posterior decentering of the humeral head in the OA population and in each type of glenoid morphology (P ≤ .005). A moderate correlation was observed in the OA group (r = -0.542; P < .001), but weak linear relationships were found for different glenoid morphology types (r between 0.041 and -0.307). Type A shoulders (r = -0.375; P = .006) correlated better than type B shoulders (r =  -0.217; P = .104). After shoulders were subcategorized according to a threshold for 3D subluxation, the posteriorly subluxated group increased its correlation (r = -0.438; P < .001), whereas the centered shoulders still exhibited no relationship (r = -0.192; P = .329).

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior humeral head decentering in relation to the native glenoid is present in each glenoid morphology type. Grouping measures according to morphology type and 3D subluxation showed at best moderate correlations between morbid version and 3D GHSI.

Comparison of Glenoid Version and Posterior Humeral Subluxation in Patients With and Without Posterior Shoulder Instability

PURPOSE

To evaluate glenoid version and humeral subluxation on preoperative multiplanar imaging of patients who underwent surgery for posterior glenohumeral instability compared with a matched group of patients who had shoulder surgery for other pathology.

METHODS

All patients over a 2-year period who underwent surgery for posterior instability had preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging or MR arthrogram reviewed. Patients undergoing shoulder surgery for reasons other than instability were identified as a control group and matched by sex, laterality, and age. Measurement of glenoid version and percentage of humeral subluxation was performed by 2 reviewers after completing a tutorial. Reviewers were blinded to diagnosis and to whether or not the patients were in the experimental or control group.

RESULTS

There were 41 patients in each group. The average glenoid version in the control group was 5.6° of retroversion (standard deviation [SD] 3.0), and the average humeral subluxation was 54% (SD 5.1%). In the experimental group, the average glenoid version was 8.1° of retroversion (SD 5.0). The average humeral subluxation in the experimental group was 56% (SD 6.8%). Student t test revealed a statistically significant difference in glenoid version (P = .009) but not humeral subluxation (P = .25). Intra- and inter-rater reliability was measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient and found to have an excellent Fleiss rating with regard to both measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Glenoid retroversion is significantly increased in patients with symptomatic posterior labral tears compared with a control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to posterior humeral subluxation and, therefore, is not a reliable indicator of the presence or absence of symptomatic posterior shoulder instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

A three-dimensional comparative study on the scapulohumeral relationship in normal and osteoarthritic shoulders

BACKGROUND

Eccentric loading due to humeral translation is associated with worse clinical outcomes in hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 3-dimensional relationship of the humeral head to the scapula (scapulohumeral relationship) in nonpathologic shoulders and in shoulders with primary osteoarthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography scans of 151 nonpathologic shoulders (control group) and 110 shoulders with primary glenohumeral arthritis (OA group) were analyzed by measuring the anterior-posterior, inferior-superior, and medial-lateral position of the humeral head in relation to the scapula. Shoulders were classified as centered (type A) or posteriorly subluxed (type B) according to the Walch classification of glenoid morphology. Reproducibility and differences in scapulohumeral relationship were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The scapulohumeral relationship could be determined reliably: the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged between 0.780 and 0.978; the typical error of measurement ranged between 2.4% and 5.0%. Both type A and type B shoulders showed significant posterior translation of the humeral head (P <.001). Type B shoulders had significantly more posterior translation than type A shoulders (P <.001). A tendency of inferior translation was noted, although with only marginal statistical significance (P = .051). In each morphology class, a medial deviation of the humeral head, representing a reduced glenohumeral distance, was measured (P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The main characteristics of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis are posterior humeral head translation relative to the scapula, reduced glenohumeral distance, and a tendency toward inferior humeral head translation in both type A and type B shoulders.

ASSESMENT OF KEY PARAMETERS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DELTOID MUSCLE IN REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY — A MODELING AND SIMULATION-BASED STUDY

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), in which anatomic concavities of glenohumeral (GH) joint are inverted, is a popular treatment of arthritic shoulders with deficient rotator cuff. The correct positioning of the glenohumeral center of rotation and initial setting of the deltoid length (Deltoid Tension) plays an important role in the outcome of the RSA. A study of the key literature has shown that despite common use of RSA, its biomechanical characteristics during motion are not fully understood. This study investigates the influence of some of the key parameters on the intensity of the moment in a shoulder after RSA during abduction in scapular plane. The kinematics after RSA are then compared with the anatomic shoulder kinematics and differences are discussed. Mathematical models of both the anatomical and reverse shoulder (RS) were developed in MATLAB and in MSC ADAMS. The anatomical and RSA geometries were defined using measurements obtained from X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of the shoulder girdle. The results show that in RSA, the intensity of the moment generated in the GH joint improves. However, this improvement does not show a constant trend and its intensity can dramatically decrease in higher GH joint abduction.

The osseous morphology of nondegenerated shoulders shows no side-related differences in elderly patients: an analysis of 102 computed tomography scans

BACKGROUND

A precise understanding of glenohumeral anatomy is required to optimize preoperative planning in shoulder joint arthroplasty, which is difficult in the presence of degenerative disease. In unilateral disease, the contralateral shoulder can be used as a representation of normal anatomy; however, intrasubject differences in shoulder morphology have not been investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients aged >65 years who received whole body computed tomography at our trauma center from 2010 through 2014 was conducted. Right and left shoulder computed tomography scans were examined, and the following anatomic parameters were measured: humeral head diameter in anteroposterior and axial views, glenoid diameter in anteroposterior and axial views, glenoid surface, scapula neck depth, neck-shaft angle, glenoid inclination, glenoid/head ratio, and glenoid version. Patients with inadequate scan quality, osseous lesions, pre-existing anatomic abnormality, or metallic implant at the shoulder region and significant osteoarthritis were excluded.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 102 shoulders of 51 patients. Mean age was 71.4 ± 8.2 years. Humeral head and glenoid diameters, scapula neck depth (right, 36 ± 8 mm; left, 36 ± 7 mm; P = .684), glenoid/head ratio (right, 0.6 ± 0.1; left, 0.6 ± 0.0; P = .961), and glenoid surface (right, 790 ± 152 mm(2); left, 754 ± 134 mm(2); P = .215) showed no significant side-related differences. In addition, no significant difference was found regarding the neck-shaft angle (P = .211) and glenoid anteversion or retroversion (right, 65% [n = 33] anteversion and 35% [n = 18] retroversion; left, 69% [n = 35] anteversion and 31% [n = 16] retroversion; P = .417).

CONCLUSION

There are no significant side-dependent differences in the osseous anatomy of the glenohumeral joint. In patients with unilateral shoulder degeneration, the contralateral shoulder can provide reference values during the planning of shoulder replacement surgery.

Are spinoglenoid ganglion cysts early markers of glenohumeral arthritis?

HYPOTHESIS

The objective of this study was to improve our understanding of the pathogenesis and symptoms of ganglion cysts (GCs) in the spinoglenoid notch. Two hypotheses were tested: (1) the labral tears responsible for these cysts are mainly degenerative and nontraumatic, (2) spinoglenoid cysts are early magnetic resonance image (MRI) markers of eccentric posterior glenoid wear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a descriptive diagnostic study. Patients were included when a spinoglenoid cyst was discovered after complaints of pain in the posterosuperior aspect of the shoulder. MRI and arthroscopy were used to classify the glenoid GC and characterize the glenohumeral joint. The GCs were classified into 1 of 3 types: GC0 (isolated cyst), GC1 (cyst and associated labral lesion), and GC2 (cyst and associated labral and cartilage lesion).

RESULTS

Twenty patients (average age, 43 years) were included between 2000 and 2014. There were 7 GC0, 8 GC1, and 5 GC2 type cysts. Isolated labral tears (GC1) were always located posteriorly, without anterior extension or glenoid detachment. The humeral subluxation index was above 55% in 75% of shoulders, including all of the type GC2 shoulders. The 5 GC2 shoulders had type B1, B2, or C glenoids.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of paraglenoid labral cysts must go beyond addressing the suprascapular nerve compression related to traumatic labral detachment, and surgeons should look automatically for associated degenerative joint damage. The diagnosis of GCs should be supplemented by humeral subluxation index measurement on computed tomography scan or MRI, and the patient should be informed that joint-related posterior shoulder pain might persist in cases of GC1 and GC2.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Basic Science Study; Anatomy; Imaging and In Vivo.

Posterior augmented glenoid implants require less bone removal and generate lower stresses: a finite element analysis

HYPOTHESIS

Glenoid retroversion can be corrected with standard glenoid implants after anterior-side asymmetric reaming or by using posterior augmented glenoid implants with built-in corrections. The purpose of this study was to compare 2 augmented glenoid designs with a standard glenoid design, measure the amount of bone removed, and compute the stresses generated in the cement and bone.

METHODS

Finite element models of 3 arthritic scapulae with varying severities of posterior glenoid wear were each implanted with 4 different implant configurations: standard glenoid implant in neutral alignment with asymmetric reaming, standard glenoid implant in retroversion, glenoid implant augmented with a posterior wedge in neutral alignment, and glenoid implant augmented with a posterior step in neutral alignment. The volume of cortical and cancellous bone removed and the percentage of implant back surface supported by cortical bone were measured. Stresses and strains in the implant, cement, and glenoid bone were computed.

RESULTS

Asymmetric reaming for the standard implant in neutral version required the most bone removal, resulted in the lowest percentage of back surface supported by cortical bone, and generated strain levels that risked damage to the most bone volume. The wedged implant removed less bone, had a significantly greater percentage of the back surface supported by cortical bone, and generated strain levels that risked damage to significantly less bone volume.

CONCLUSIONS

The wedged glenoid implants appear to have various advantages over the standard implant for the correction of retroversion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Basic Science Study; Computer Modeling.

Outcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis in type B glenoids

BACKGROUND

Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with posterior wear of the glenoid and posterior subluxation of the humerus (Walch type B) presents a challenge to the treating surgeon. Our hypothesis was that glenoids with biconcavity (B2) would be associated with worse outcomes (functional scores and complications) than B1 glenoids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data on 112 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (104 patients) with B glenoids. Preoperative computed tomography identified 64 B1 glenoids and 48 B2 glenoids (50 and 37 available for follow-up).

RESULTS

A significant difference between B1 and B2 glenoids was noted in average retroversion (11° vs. 16°; P < .001) and average posterior humeral subluxation (65% vs. 75%; P < .001). No significant difference was seen in mean age (69.5 vs. 69.2 years) or body mass index (28.5 vs. 27.4) at time of surgery. At average follow-up of 60 months (range, 23-120 months), glenoid component radiolucencies (51.6%, B1; 47.9%, B2), range of motion, preoperative and postoperative scores of the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and patient satisfaction were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Four revisions (4.6%) were documented for acute postoperative infection (2.3%), subscapularis failure (1.1%), and glenoid loosening (1.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although biconcave glenoids commonly have more severe retroversion and posterior subluxation of the humerus, we were unable to find a clinical or radiographic difference in outcome of patients with B1 or B2 glenoids treated with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty at intermediate-term follow-up. Continued clinical and radiographic follow-up of these cohorts will be necessary to assess any future divergence in outcome.

Computed tomography morphological analysis of the scapula and its implications in shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Healthy shoulder morphology is still unclear. Since bone morphology influences prosthetic features, this is relevant for glenohumeral joint reconstruction. The objective of this study was to assess the normal values of glenoid version, maximum width, base width and vault depth on computed tomography scans.

METHODS

Axial cut CT scans of 1072 healthy glenoids were retrospectively reviewed. Values of glenoid version, maximum glenoid width, glenoid base width and glenoid vault depth were measured by two different observers. Differences were determined between genders, and reproducibility and interrater reliability assessed.

RESULTS

Glenoid version was 37.71° ± 10.75°, range -6.20° to 71.30°; maximum glenoid width was 26.06 ± 3.27 mm, range 15.40-36.90 mm; glenoid base width was 16.59 ± 2.61 mm, range 8.90-25.40 mm; glenoid vault depth was 9.72 ± 1.62 mm, range 4.70-15.90 mm. All measurements except for glenoid version were significantly higher in males than in females. Reproducibility was good for every measurement, except glenoid vault depth.

CONCLUSION

We found differences in maximum glenoid width, base width and vault depth by gender in a large sample. Glenoid components' maximum width was defined, as was reaming extension and orientation, the space available for implantation of the glenoid component, placement of pegs or keels in anatomic prostheses and the target for glenoid screws in inverted prostheses.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Quantification of B2 glenoid morphology in total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

B2 glenoid morphology is challenging to address with shoulder reconstruction. Deformity often renders current techniques inadequate, necessitating compromises that limit long-term implant durability. The purpose of this study was to perform in vivo measurements of glenoid deformity to better appreciate the orientation of the B2 biconcavity demarcation and erosion that surgeons face intraoperatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive 106 total shoulder arthroplasty cases for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis were studied. We classified glenoids by direct visualization and noted lines of biconcavity demarcation and erosion in B2s. We then calculated the "angle of erosion" as that between the back side of the unsupported, smooth-backed glenoid sizer disk and the neoglenoid. We obtained depth measurements throughout the reaming process and monitored subchondral bone.

RESULTS

We classified 43 of 106 glenoids (41%) as B2. A biconcavity demarcation line between the paleoglenoid and the neoglenoid was present, on average, from the 1-o'clock to the 7-o'clock position for a left shoulder. Mean depth of erosion was 4.4 mm, occurring at 114° on a Cartesian coordinate system for a left shoulder. The mean angle of erosion was 18° (range, 8°-43°). Despite reaming, 20 of 43 B2 glenoids (47%) had incompletely supported components at final seating.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthritic B2 glenoids are common, and their maximal erosion is usually posteroinferior. Use of standard glenoid components to reconstruct them may require significant subchondral bone removal to achieve complete bone support. Alternatively, as a compromise, maintenance of subchondral bone in these cases requires implanting components with incomplete bony support.

Posterior augmented glenoid designs preserve more bone in biconcave glenoids

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Total shoulder arthroplasty is recommended treatment for severe osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint, which often results in excessive posterior wear. Two recent glenoid components with posterior augments have been designed to correct excessive posterior wear and retroversion. Our primary hypothesis was that posterior augmented glenoid designs require less bone removal than a standard glenoid design.

METHODS

Ten arthritic scapulae classified as Walch B2 glenoids were virtually implanted with standard, stepped, and wedged components. The volume of surgical bone removal, the maximum reaming depth, and the portion of the implant surface in contact with cancellous vs. cortical bone were calculated for each implant.

RESULTS

The neoglenoid made up an average of 65% ± 12% of the glenoid width. Mean surgical bone volume removed was least for the wedged (2857 ± 1618 mm(3)) compared with the stepped (4307 ± 1485 mm(3); P < .001) and standard (5385 ± 2348 mm(3); P < .001) designs. Maximum bone depth removed for the wedged (4.2 ± 2.0 mm) was less than for the stepped (7.6 ± 1.2 mm; P < .001) and standard (9.9 ± 3.2 mm; P < .001). The mean percentage of the implant's back surface supported by cancellous bone was 18.2% for the standard, 8.8% for the stepped (P = .02), and 4.3% for the wedged (P = .01).

DISCUSSION

Both augmented components corrected glenoid version to neutral and required less bone removal, required less reaming depth, and were supported by more cortical bone than in the standard implant. The least amount of bone removed was with the wedged design.

The effects of glenoid wear patterns on patients with osteoarthritis in total shoulder arthroplasty: an assessment of outcomes and value

BACKGROUND

Despite the success of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), concerns remain about the longevity of the implant, in particular, glenoid component survivorship. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative glenoid wear patterns affect clinical outcomes and value in patients undergoing TSA.

METHODS

A comparative cohort study was conducted of 309 patients with a total of 344 TSA procedures, performed for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Computed tomography scans were obtained in all patients, with preoperative glenoid wear pattern characterized as either concentric (n = 196; follow-up time, 49.2 months) or eccentric (n = 148; follow-up time, 52.3 months) according to a modified Levine classification. A clinical, radiographic, and economic assessment was performed between the 2 wear patterns.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score in the concentric group (80.8 ± 20.8) compared with the eccentric group (77.6 ± 21.2) at final follow-up (P = .159). Range of motion and final visual analog scale for pain score were similar between the 2 groups. Radiographic evidence of gross glenoid loosening was significantly lower in the concentric group [11 of 195 (5.6%)] compared with the eccentric group [18 of 147 (12.2%)] (P = .030). Revision rates were similar between the concentric group [4 of 195 (2.0%)] and the eccentric group [3 of 147 (2.0%)]. A value assessment also showed no significant difference between the concentric and eccentric groups [concentric 26.1 vs. eccentric 25.5 (ΔASES score/$10,000 hospital cost) (P = .479)].

CONCLUSIONS

Similar clinical results and value can be expected with both concentric and eccentric glenoid wear patterns in TSA. Concerns arise, however, as the eccentric group demonstrated a more than 2-fold increased rate of glenoid component loosening compared with the concentric group.

Importance of a three-dimensional measure of humeral head subluxation in osteoarthritic shoulders

HYPOTHESIS

During total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), humeral head subluxation may be difficult to manage. Furthermore, there is a risk for postoperative recurrence of subluxation, affecting the outcome of TSA. An accurate evaluation of the subluxation is necessary to evaluate this risk. Currently, subluxation is measured in 2 dimensions (2D), usually relative to the glenoid face. The goal of this study was to extend this measure to 3 dimensions (3D) to compare glenohumeral and scapulohumeral subluxation and to evaluate the association of subluxation with the glenoid version.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study analyzed 112 computed tomography scans of osteoarthritic shoulders. We extended the usual 2D definition of glenohumeral subluxation, scapulohumeral subluxation, and glenoid version by measuring their orientation in 3D relative to the scapular plane and the scapular axis. We evaluated statistical associations between subluxation and version in 2D and 3D.

RESULTS

Orientation of subluxation and version covered all sectors of the glenoid surface. Scapulohumeral subluxation and glenoid version were highly correlated in amplitude (R(2) = 0.71; P < .01) and in orientation (R(2) = 0.86; P < .01). Approximately every degree of glenoid version induced 1% of scapulohumeral subluxation in the same orientation of the version. Conversely, glenohumeral subluxation was not correlated to glenoid version in 2D or in 3D.

CONCLUSIONS

Orientation of the humeral subluxation is rarely within the arbitrary computed tomography plane and should therefore be measured in 3D to detect out-of-plane subluxation. Scapulohumeral subluxation and glenoid version measured in 3D could bring valuable information for decision making during TSA.

Guidelines for the selection of optimal glenoid augment size for moderate to severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Total shoulder arthroplasty is technically demanding in regard to implantation of the glenoid component, especially in the setting of increased glenoid deformity and posterior glenoid wear. Augmented glenoid implants are an important and innovative option; however, there is little evidence accessible to surgeons to guide in the selection of the appropriate size augmented glenoid.

METHODS

Solid computer models of commercially available augmented glenoid components (+3, +5, +7) contained within the software allowed placement of the best fit glenoid component within the three-dimensional reconstruct of each patient's scapula. Peg perforation, amount of bone reamed, and amount of medialization were recorded for each augment size.

RESULTS

There was strong correlation between the medialization of the joint line and the glenoid retroversion for each augmented component at neutral correction and correction to 6° of retroversion. At neutral, the range of retroversion that restored the anatomic joint line was -3° to -17° with use of the +3 augmented glenoid, -5° to -24° with the +5 augmented glenoid, and -9° to -31° with the +7 augmented glenoid. At 6° of retroversion, the range of retroversion that restored the anatomic joint line was -4° to -21° with use of the +3 augmented glenoid, -7° to -27° with the +5 augmented glenoid, and -9° to -34° with the +7 augmented glenoid.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a strong correlation between glenoid retroversion and medialization for all augment sizes, supporting the recommendation for glenoid retroversion as the primary guide in selecting the amount of augmentation.

Axillary view: arthritic glenohumeral anatomy and changes after ream and run

BACKGROUND

The technique and results of shoulder arthroplasty are influenced by glenohumeral pathoanatomy. Although some authors advocate a routine preoperative CT scan to define this anatomy, ordering a CT scan substantially increases the cost and the radiation exposure for the patient.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether measurements of arthritic shoulders on a standardized axillary view are reliable; if postoperative radiographs can reliably show the changes in glenoid anatomy and glenohumeral relationships after shoulder arthroplasty, and if the axillary view can show differences in glenohumeral pathoanatomy in the different sexes and disease types.

METHODS

These questions were addressed using cross-sectional studies of 344 shoulders with different types of arthritis and of 128 osteoarthritic shoulders having a ream and run arthroplasty (a glenohumeral arthroplasty that combines a noncemented humeral hemiarthroplasty with concentric reaming of the glenoid bone without implantation of a prosthetic glenoid component). Measurements of glenoid type, glenoid version, and glenohumeral contact were made on standardized axillary radiographs. Interobserver reliability was calculated, preoperative and postoperative measurements were compared, and morphologic differences were compared as stratified by sex and disease type.

RESULTS

The measurements on axillary views showed a high degree of interobserver reliability and sensitivity to the changes effected by arthroplasty. The ream and run substantially corrected the glenoid type and point of glenohumeral contact. Male shoulders and shoulders with osteoarthritis had more type B glenoids (ie, those with posterior erosion and biconcavity of the glenoid), more retroversion, and a greater degree of posterior displacement of the point of glenohumeral contact.

CONCLUSIONS

The axillary view provides a practical method of characterizing glenohumeral anatomy before and after surgery that is less costly and exposes the patient to less radiation than a CT scan.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, diagnostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Augmented wedge-shaped glenoid component for the correction of glenoid retroversion: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

This study undertook a computational analysis of a wedged glenoid component for correction of retroverted glenoid arthritic deformity to determine whether a wedge-shaped glenoid component design with a built-in correction for version reduces excessive stresses in the implant, cement, and glenoid bone. Recommendations for correcting retroversion deformity are asymmetric reaming of the anterior glenoid, bone grafting of the posterior glenoid, or a glenoid component with posterior augmentation. Eccentric reaming has the disadvantages of removing normal bone, reducing structural support for the glenoid component, and increasing the risk of bone perforation by the fixation pegs. Bone grafting to correct retroverted deformity does not consistently generate successful results.

METHODS

Finite element models of 2 scapulae models representing a normal and an arthritic retroverted glenoid were implanted with a standard glenoid component (in retroversion or neutral alignment) or a wedged component. Glenohumeral forces representing in vivo loading were applied and stresses and strains computed in the bone, cement, and glenoid component.

RESULTS

The retroverted glenoid components generated the highest compressive stresses and decreased cyclic fatigue life predictions for trabecular bone. Correction of retroversion by the wedged glenoid component significantly decreased stresses and predicted greater bone fatigue life. The cement volume estimated to survive 10 million cycles was the lowest for the retroverted components and the highest for neutrally implanted glenoid components and for wedged components.

CONCLUSION

A wedged glenoid implant is a viable option to correct severe arthritic retroversion, reducing the need for eccentric reaming and the risk for implant failure.

The primer for sports medicine professionals on imaging: the shoulder

Because of its inherent superior soft tissue contrast and lack of ionizing radiation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly suited to study the complex anatomy of the shoulder joint, particularly when assessing the relatively high incidence of shoulder injuries in young, athletic patients. This review aims to serve as a primer for understanding shoulder MRI in an algorithmical approach, including MRI protocol and technique, normal anatomy and anatomical variations of the shoulder, pathologic conditions of the rotator cuff tendons and muscles, the long head of the biceps tendon, shoulder impingement, labral and glenohumeral ligament pathology, MR findings in shoulder instability, adhesive capsulitis, and osteoarthritis.

Current concepts in the surgical management of primary glenohumeral arthritis with a biconcave glenoid

Glenoid morphology has an important impact on outcomes and complication rates after shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral arthritis. The B2 glenoid, or a biconcave glenoid with posterior humeral head subluxation, in particular has been associated with a poorer outcome with shoulder arthroplasty compared with other glenoid types. A variety of techniques may be used to address the bone deficiency and instability seen with this glenoid type. Studies suggest that total shoulder arthroplasty may have a reasonable result in the short term but be associated with a high complication rate in the mid term because of recurrence of instability and early glenoid loosening when neoglenoid retroversion is greater than 27° or posterior humeral head subluxation is greater than 80%. Particularly in older patients with a substantial B2 deformity, primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty may be a more predictable means of addressing bone deficiency and restoring stability.