How should anteromedial coronoid facet fracture be managed? A surgical strategy based on O'Driscoll classification and ligament injury

Coronoid fractures and complex elbow instability: current concepts

Fractures of the coronoid process typically occur as part of more complex injury patterns, such as terrible triads, trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations, posteromedial rotatory injuries or Monteggia-like lesions. Each pattern is associated with a specific type of coronoid fracture with regard to shape and size and specific soft-tissue lesions. O' Driscoll classification incorporates those associations identifying three major types of fractures: tip, anteromedial facet, and basal fractures. The objective of this study is to review the most common types of complex elbow instability, identify the indications for coronoid fixation and guide the appropriate management. Tip fractures as those seen in terrible triads can conditionally left untreated provided that elbow stability has been restored after radial head fixation and ligaments repair. Anteromedial facet fractures benefit from a buttress plate, while large basilar fractures can be effectively secured with posteroanterior screws. Coronoid reconstruction with a graft should be considered in post-traumatic cases of chronic coronoid deficiency.

A Feasibility Study on Using Hanging Arm Test to Assess Elbow Stability During Surgical Treatment for Varus Posteromedial Rotatory Instability

Objectives

The aim of this study to investigate the safety and effectiveness of performing the hanging arm test during surgical treatment for elbow varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI) to assess elbow stability and determine whether to repair the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL).

Methods

In a retrospective study from August 2014 to March 2019, 27 patients with VPMRI who had a negative result in the hanging arm test after fixation of coronoid fracture were selected. Intraoperative bleeding, operative time, elbow range of motion (ROM), and complications were recorded. Elbow function was evaluated with the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score.

Results

The operation time was 85.9 ± 11.06 min (range 65-110). The intraoperative blood loss was 70.7 ± 9.31 ml (range 60-100). At the last follow-up, the elbow joint averaged 73.8° ± 2.931° in pronation, 78.9° ± 2.941° in supination, 7.2° ± 3.207° in extension, and 123.3° ± 6.651° in flexion. The MEPS score was 90.7 ± 4.36 (range 74-95), and the DASH score was 9.8 ± 2.58 (range 6.67-13.3). One patient presented with symptoms of ulnar nerve entrapment 2 months after operation and was treated with ulnar nerve release. The symptom of numbness went away completely 1 week after operation. No complications such as wound infection, arthritis, or chronic instability of the elbow were found in the other patients.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that not all VPMRI patients need the LUCL to be repaired, and the hanging arm test is a safe and reliable method to assess whether to repair the LUCL in the treatment of elbow VPMRI.

Level of evidence

Level IV; Retrospective studies.

Locking plate fixation in comminuted coronoid fractures with partial loss of the articular cartilage - Of basal-1 type according to the O'Driscoll classification

BACKGROUND

We have attempted to restore the arc of motion by considering trochlear-coronoid articulation as a complete circle during fixation of the coronoid, even for comminuted coronoid fractures with partial loss of articular cartilage (CCFPLAC), using various kinds of locking plates. Herein, we report the radiological and clinical outcomes after fixation of the basal-1 type of CCFPLAC (O'Driscoll classification) using our method.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients diagnosed with CCFPLAC were admitted between January 2012 and December 2020. Sixteen of these patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were enrolled in this study. Surgically, the lost area (defect of articular cartilage) was never compressed or minimized, but the original height and shape of the coronoid were preserved as is. Provisionally, a few K-wires were used to maintain the original shape and position of the CCFPLAC, and various kinds of locking plates/screws were used to fix the fragment anatomically and firmly. If needed, the plate was bent to ensure stable compression of the coronoid according to its size. In a few cases, locking plates were adjusted by cutting extra screw holes.

RESULTS

Among the 16 patients, the mean age was 46.2 years, and the male:female ratio was 10:6. The mean follow-up period was 3.63 years. 8, 6, and 2 patients were designated as group 1 (isolated CCFPLAC), 2 [CCFPLAC in type 4 (terrible triad) injury), and 3 (CCFPLAC in type 5 posterior olecranon fracture-dislocations), respectively. Complete union was achieved after a mean of 8.94 weeks. The mean flexion-extension and pronation-supination arcs were 127.19 ± 4.46° and 135.31.59 ± 8.06°, respectively, which were significantly different from those on the contralateral (normal) side (p < 0.001); however, the arcs were within the functional ranges for ordinary daily living. Additionally, the functional status was satisfactory in all patients. However, Mayo Elbow Performance Score and the degree of arthritis were statistically poor in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

CCFPLAC of the basal-1 type (O'Driscoll classification) can be treated satisfactorily if already designed and widely distributed locking plates are properly manipulated to maintain the original geometry of the coronoid according to the individual joint characteristics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Retrospective case series.

Influence of Coronoid fixation on the functional outcome and rate of complications in surgically treated acute complex elbow instability

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the coronoid commonly present in elbow fracture-dislocations. Despite the evidence that the coronoid plays an important role in elbow stability, there is still controversy on which fractures should be surgically fixed. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and rate of complications of patients with elbow fracture-dislocations in which the coronoid was fixed or left untreated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with an elbow fracture-dislocation involving a coronoid fracture were prospectively followed for an average of 90 months (range 24-190). According to Morrey´s classification there were 22 type II and 8 type III. Nine patients had an anteromedial fracture of the coronoid. In 24 patients the coronoid was repaired (suture fixation in 9, screws fixation in 10 and plate fixation in 5) and in 15 patients the coronoid was not fixed. In 18 patients the radial head was replaced and in 8 patients it was fixed. All patients underwent repair of the lateral ligament complex. Clinical evaluation was performed with the MEPS. Radiographically, the rate of coronoid nonunion was specifically analyzed. Postoperative neurological complications were recorded.

RESULTS

At the most recent follow up, the average arc of flexion-extension was 120° (range 70°-140°) with a mean MEPS of 90 (range 25-100). No statistically significant differences were found in the MEPS and flexion-extension arc between the patients in whom synthesis was performed (117° ROM, and 89 MEPS) and those in whom it was not (122° ROM, 94 MEPS) (p = 0.42; p = 0.34). Coronoid fracture healing could be assessed in 36 patients: in 19 patients the coronoid was radiographically healed, and in 17 a nonunion was present, with no difference in the final clinical outcome between both groups. Nine patients, 6 of whom had undergone coronoid fixation, had a neurological complication related to the ulnar nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronoid fractures affecting around 50% of its height can be treated without internal fixation as long as the rest of the osteo-ligamentous structures are adequately repaired. Osteosynthesis of the coronoid through a medial approach may carry a non-negligible risk of associated neurological injury.

Outcomes and complications after treatment for anteromedial facet fracture of the coronoid process: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Fracture of the anteromedial facet (AMF) of the coronoid process is associated with varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI). However, there is still controversy regarding the optimal treatment for AMF fracture. The purpose of this study is to report on a systematic review of the outcomes and complications after treatment for AMF fracture.

METHODS

This study was conducted using electronic databases, PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus. Studies reporting outcome scores and complications were included. Studies that did not utilize O'Driscoll classification for AMF fractures were excluded. Through conduct of a thorough review of included studies, definite VPMRI were identified and cases involving other injury mechanisms were excluded.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles reporting on 246 patients were included. According to O'Driscoll classification, 6.2% of cases were anteromedial subtype I, 73.7% were subtype II, and 20.1% were subtype III. Two-hundred sixteen patients (87.8%) were treated surgically and 30 patients (12.2%) were treated conservatively. Lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries were 76.2% (157/206) and medial collateral ligament injuries were 16.9% (33/195). Among 216 cases who underwent surgical treatment, depending on the fragment size, displacement, and instability, coronoid fixation was performed in 189 cases and LCL repair alone was performed in 27 cases. The mean final Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 92.1 and the Broberg & Morrey score was 89.5. The overall complication and reoperation rates were 17.7% (41/232) and 12.9% (26/202).

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgical and conservative treatment for AMF fractures resulted in satisfactory final clinical outcomes. However, high complication and reoperation rates were observed.

"How the Wrightington classification of traumatic elbow instability can simplify the algorithm for treatment"

There are numerous injury patterns of elbow-fracture dislocation that can lead to confusion about the best surgical management. The Wrightington classification aims to provide a simple categorization based on the injury to the coronoid process and the three column concept of the elbow osseous stability that describes a medial column consisting of the anteromedial coronoid facet and sublime tubercle, the middlecolumn is the anterolateral coronoid facet, and the lateral column is the radial head and lateral ligament complex with a fulcrum for varus/valgus stability between the two coronoid facets. Injuries are classified as type A (anteromedial facet/medial-column), B (bifacet/ medial and middle-columns), B+ (bifacet with radial head/all three columns), C (combined radial head and anterolateral facet/middle and lateral-columns), D (distal to coronoid where coronoid is in continuity with olecranon process), and D+ (distal to coronoid with radial head fracture). With each bony injury pattern, we can anticipate which soft tissue constraints are likely to be involved and the importance of their repair to restore stability, and thereby develop algorithms for management. The Wrightington classification has been shown to be reliable and valid. A consecutive series of 60 patients with elbow-fracture dislocation managed according to the surgical algorithms of the Wrightington classification have been reported to have excellent outcomes with a median Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 100 (interquartile 85-100) and flexion/extension arc of movement of 123° (interquartile 101°-130°). In conclusion, the Wrightington classification of elbow-fracture dislocation is a comprehensive, reliable, and valid classification with treatment algorithms that are associated with good functional outcomes.

The effect of lateral collateral ligament repair tension on elbow stability: An in vitro biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal repair tension of the lateral collateral ligament of the elbow by performing simulated active flexion with the arm in the varus gravity loaded position using an in vitro elbow simulator.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric specimens were mounted in the varus gravity loaded orientation onto an elbow motion simulator. Four states were studied (intact, lateral collateral ligament injured, and 15 N and 20 N lateral collateral ligament repairs) with the forearm in supination and pronation. An electromagnetic tracking system was used to measure joint kinematics during active elbow flexion.

FINDINGS

There was no difference in ulnohumeral rotation between the intact state and the 15 N repair (P = .150 for pronation; P = 1.0 for supination) or the 20 N repair (P = 1.0 for pronation; P = .568 for supination). For varus-valgus angulation, the 20 N repair was not statistically different from the intact state (P = .059 in pronation; P = 1.0 in supination).

INTERPRETATION

Repair of the lateral collateral ligament following injury can restore joint kinematics with the arm in the varus position. A repair tension of 20 N was successful in restoring joint stability for simulated active motion with the forearm in pronation and supination. This study shows that when the lateral collateral ligament is repaired with adequate tension, avoidance of the varus position may not be as crucial during early motion.

Conservative versus surgical management of isolated O'Driscoll II coronoid fracture: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the current literature on conservative and surgical management of isolated O'Driscoll II coronoid fracture.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

We systematically searched Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases for published studies by complying with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and using the keywords "isolated coronoid fracture," "O'Driscoll type 2 coronoid fracture," "anteromedial coronoid fracture," "anteromedial facet coronoid fracture," "posteromedial rotatory instability," and "varus posteromedial rotatory instability." Patients were divided into conservative treatment and surgical treatment groups. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies were assessed to determine each article's quality. The primary outcomes of the present reviews were the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, and the secondary outcomes were associated with complications and reoperations. Eligible trials were independently chosen by two review authors, and a third reviewer resolved all disagreements.

RESULTS

The search yielded 458 records, among which 446 articles were of relevance, and 12 were included. In the final review, 138 patients were evaluated-98 (71%) who received surgical treatment and 40 (29%) who received conservative treatment. The mean MEPS score and the DASH score of surgical treatment were 91 and 8, respectively; 69.8% of patients had excellent scores, and 27.0% had good scores. The mean MEPS score and the DASH score of conservative treatment were 92 and 12, respectively; 70.6% of patients had excellent scores, and 23.5% had good scores.

CONCLUSIONS

In select cases, conservative treatment can achieve good results in the treatment of isolated O'Driscoll II coronoid fracture when a stricter indication is followed. However, there is insufficient evidence to recommend the appropriate treatment for a particular fracture subtype, and there is a need for more high-quality randomized controlled trials to determine which treatment is superior.

Comparison of buttress plate and cannulated screw in the treatment of anteromedial coronoid fracture with elbow posteromedial rotatory instability

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of buttress plate and cannulated screw in the treatment of anteromedial coronoid fracture with posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients who were diagnosed with O'Driscoll type 2 fractures combined with elbow posteromedial rotatory instability and underwent surgery for anteromedial coronoid fracture between August 2014 and March 2019. They were divided into buttress plate (n=16) and cannulated screw (n=11) groups. The elbow range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS), Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score (DASH) were used for clinical outcome assessment.

RESULT

There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes. However, the surgical time was significantly shorter in cannulated screw group (85.45±4.156) compared to the buttress plate group (93.81±8.863, P=0.008), and the surgical time was associated with internal fixation (P=0.008).

CONCLUSION

Although there was selection of cases in that small fragments were treated with buttress plate and large fragments with cannulated screw, the buttress plate and cannulated screw have comparable functional outcomes on fixation of the anteromedial coronoid fracture with elbow PMRI. The fixation of the anteromedial coronoid fracture with large fragments using the cannulated screw has a shorter operation time.

Anteromedial coronoid facet fractures and associated ligament lesions: A case series

INTRODUCTION

Varus posteromedial rotational injury mechanisms lead to fractures of the coronoids process' anteromedial facet. As these fractures are often unstable, rapid fracture treatment is vital to prevent progressive osteoarthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve patients with a fracture of the anteromedial facet treated surgically were enrolled in the study. Computed tomography images were used to classify the fractures according to the system by O'Driscoll et al. Clinical follow-up included each patient's medical record, surgical treatment algorithm, all complications encountered during the follow-up period, Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score, subjective elbow value, and pain.

RESULTS

A total of 8 men (66.7%) and 4 women (33.3%) were treated surgically and followed-up after a mean period of 45 ± 23 months. The mean DASH score was 11.9 ± 12.9 points. One patient complained of transient neuropathy in the innervation area of the ulnar nerve, however, this existed already pre-operatively and resolved after less than three months.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented patient cohort shows that AMF fracture of the coronoid process are unstable lesions according to the bony instability and the frequently ruptured collateral ligament complexes which need to be addressed. The MCL seems to be affected more frequently than previously appreciated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study.

Functional outcomes of elbow injuries managed according to the Wrightington classification of elbow fracture-dislocations

Background

This study aims to review the functional outcomes of patients managed by the application of the Wrightington elbow fracture-dislocation classification system and its corresponding management algorithms.

Methods

This is a retrospective consecutive case series of patients over the age of 16 with an elbow fracture-dislocation managed according to the Wrightington classification. The primary outcome was the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) at the last follow-up. Range of movement (ROM) and complications were collected as a secondary outcome.

Results

Sixty patients qualified for inclusion (32 female, 28 male) with a mean age of 48 years (19-84). Fifty-eight (97%) patients completed a minimum of three months follow-up. Mean follow-up was six months (3-18). The median MEPS at the final follow-up was 100 (interquartile range [IQR] 85-100) and median ROM of 123° (IQR 101-130) degrees. Four patients underwent secondary surgery and had improved outcomes with the average MEPS score improving from 65 to 94 following the second surgery.

Conclusions

The results of this study show that good outcomes can be achieved for complex elbow fracture-dislocations through pattern recognition and management with an anatomically based reconstruction algorithm as described by the Wrightington classification system.

Coronoid fixation and lateral collateral ligament repair in varus posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow

Background

Varus posteromedial rotatory instability is a relatively rare elbow injury, that has been infrequently reported in published literature. We intended to evaluate the outcomes of surgical management of this rare injury with anteromedial coronoid fixation, and, in selected patients, lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) repair.

Methods

Between 2017 and 2020, we identified 12 patients with anteromedial coronoid fractures, and a varus posteromedial rotatory instability, who underwent surgery for fixation of the coronoid fracture, with or without LCL repair. All the included patients were either O'Driscoll subtype 2-2, or subtype 2-3. All the 12 patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months, and their functional outcomes assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).

Results

The mean MEPS recorded in our study was 92.08, and the mean range of elbow flexion achieved was 124.2°. The mean flexion contracture in our patients was 5.83°. Three of our twelve patients (25%) suffered from elbow stiffness even at final follow-up. The results were graded as Excellent in eight, Good in three, and Fair in one patient.

Conclusion

Coronoid fractures and LUCL disruptions associated with varus posteromedial rotatory instability can be reliably managed by employing a protocol that combines radiographic parameters, as well as intra-operative assessments of stability. While surgical intervention successfully restored stability, there is a learning curve to the management of these injuries and complications are not uncommon, particularly elbow stiffness. Hence, in addition to surgical fixation, emphasis should also be placed on intensive post-operative rehabilitation to improve outcomes.

A Novel Suture-Preset Spring Plate System (SSPS) for Comminuted Coronoid Process Fracture in the Elbow

OBJECTIVE

This study is aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of a novel SSPS for fixation of the comminuted coronoid fracture.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out in the patients with comminuted fractures of the coronoid treated by SPSS fixation between January 2014 and December 2018. A total of 17 patients (17 sides) was included in our study, including 11 male and six female, with a mean age range from 18 to 60. All cases started to functional rehabilitation immediately after the operation. Clinical outcomes were evaluated both radiographically and functionally at the follow-up visit, including the elbow instability, range of motion and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS).

RESULTS

According to the O'Driscoll classification system, there was two side of type 1.2, two of type 2.1, four of type 2.2, three of type 2.3, two of 3.1 and four of type 3.2. The surgery was carried out by Kocher and anteromedial approach in 12 patients, posterior and anteromedial approach in four, anterior approach in one. The average operation time and intraoperative blood loss was 129.41±43.87 min and 115.29±104.65 ml. The median follow-up time was 9 months (range, 6 to 15 months). The mean flexion, extension, pronation and supination motion was 138.76±8.67 degrees, 20.00±13.58, 82.94±5.32and 74.12±14.39 respectively at final follow up. The mean MEPS score was 89.76±8.46, including 11 excellent, 3 good and 3 fair result. The mean VAS score was 1.94±0.97. The mean union time of coronoid fractures was 2.77±0.31 months according to the established standard of healing. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes among groups according to the O'Driscoll classification (P > .05) and ligament repair strategy (P > .05). No patient underwent instability or dislocation of the elbow during follow up. There were two cases with mild ulnar nerve symptoms which recovered totally at follow up. Meanwhile, there were three cases with heterotopic ossification of the elbow.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that the SSPS can provide a reliable fixation for the comminuted coronoid fracture with satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Results of arthroscopically assisted reduction and fixation of anteromedial facet coronoid fractures at short-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Varus posteromedial rotatory instability is a typical pattern of elbow injury that involves fracture of the anteromedial facet (AMF) of the coronoid, as well as injuries to the lateral ligament complex and the posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament. Some authors support the idea that subtype II AMF coronoid fractures require fixation to restore elbow stability, but this topic is still an issue in the literature. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiologic outcomes of arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) of AMF fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center trial evaluated consecutive patients who underwent ARIF of isolated subtype II AMF coronoid fractures between 2014 and 2020. At the final follow-up, the patients were examined for elbow range of motion, stability, and pain. Injury and post-treatment radiographs were reviewed to assess fracture healing and heterotopic ossification.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients (21 male and 11 female patients) with a median age of 47 ± 16 years were included. The average follow-up period was 28 ± 12.4 months. Coronoid process fractures were fixed by cannulated screws in 26 cases (81.25%); in 2 of these cases, additional Kirschner wires were used. Two Kirschner wires were used in 1 case (3.12%), and in the remaining 5 cases (15.62%), osteosuture was used. The lateral ulnar collateral ligament was injured in 27 cases (84.4%) and was always repaired. Other associated lesions were medial collateral ligament injury, osteochondral lesion, and radial head fracture. There were no surgical complications. At the final follow-up, the average Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 98.4 ± 2.7 and the mean Oxford Elbow Score was 47.3 ± 1.4. No cases of nonunion were detected on radiographic assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although technically demanding, ARIF has several potential advantages in comparison to open surgery: less scarring, a decreased risk of infection, and less postoperative pain.

Classification of coronoid process fractures: A pending question

Ulna coronoid fracture is a complicated elbow injury. Comprehensive classification of coronoid fracture can assist diagnosis, guide treatment, and improve prognosis. Existing coronoid fracture classifications are insufficient to interpret all fracture patterns. The coronoid fracture classification is associated with elbow-specific trauma patterns. Coronoid fractures are often associated with other elbow injuries, commonly with radial head fractures, which makes the clinical strategies inconsistent and prognosis poor. The current fracture classifications do not contain information about combined injuries. Preservation of ulnohumeral joint contact after trauma is critical to elbow mechanical and kinematic stability. Important fracture types for treatment include terrible-triad injuries and anteromedial facet fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation of these two fractures should be conducted when marked displacement of the fragment, elbow instability under stress, and complicated associated injuries. The current surgical tactics based on classifications are still controversial.

Operative Fixation of the Anteromedial Facet of the Coronoid Process

Anteromedial coronoid facet fractures typically occur with varus, pronation, and axial forces applied to the elbow. Due in part to the high rate of concomitant lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries, untreated anteromedial facet fractures can result in varus and posteromedial rotatory elbow instability. Although small fractures that are not amenable to open reduction and internal fixation can be treated with isolated LCL repair, larger fragments are treated with buttress plating on the anteromedial surface of the coronoid with or without LCL repair. The "over-the-top" approach via a split in the flexor pronator mass is the preferred method of accessing the anteromedial facet. Although data regarding the functional outcomes after operative fixation of the anteromedial facet are limited, observational studies have demonstrated good restoration of elbow stability and motion.

[Clinical treatment of dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum combined with medial or posterior medial dislocation of the elbow joint]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the possible injury mechanisms in patients with dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum combined with medial or posterior medial dislocation of the elbow joint, and to discuss their treatment and prognosis.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 4 patients with dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum combined with medial or posterior medial dislocation of the elbow joint admitted between September 2014 and September 2020, including 3 males and 1 female with an average age of 20.7 years (range, 13-32 years). There were 2 cases of dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum combined with medial dislocation of the elbow joint and 2 cases of dorsal avulsion fracture of the capitellum and anterior medial fracture of the coronoid process combined with posterior medial subluxation of the elbow joint. Closed reduction was performed in 3 patients with fresh fracture combined with dislocation, then 2 cases were fixed with tension band and 1 case was fixed with tension band combined with Acumed coronoid anatomic plate. And in patient with old fracture nonunion, the coronoid process was fixed with 1 screw, then the humeral sclerotic bone mass was removed, and finally the lateral collateral ligament was repaired and a hinged external fixator was added.

RESULTS

All the incisions healed by first intention without early complications such as infection or peripheral nerve injury. The 4 patients were followed up 13-30 months (mean, 20.8 months). The fractures all healed with a healing time of 70-90 days (mean, 79.5 days). At 6 months after operation, heterotopic ossification was seen in the posterior aspect of the right elbow joint in 1 case, and the alkaline phosphatase level was normal (67 U/L); the tension band was removed to clear the heterotopic ossification and the elbow joint was released. The rest of the patients had no heterotopic ossification. At last follow-up, all patients had good functional recovery of the elbow joint, with a Mayo score of 85-100 (mean, 92.5), and the excellent and good rate was 100%. The elbow flexion range of motion was 120°-135°, the extension range of motion was 10°-20°, and the pronation and supination range of motion were all 75°-85°.

CONCLUSION

Dorsal avulsion fractures of the capitellum combined with medial or posterior medial dislocation of the elbow may be due to simple varus stress. If an anteromedial coronoid facet fracture also occurs, it may be for the varus posteromedial rotatory instability, which is the opposite mechanism to that of an Osborne-Cotterill lesion. For fresh dorsal avulsion fractures of the capitellum, tension band fixation can be used with good results.

Dislocations of the elbow - An instructional review

Dislocations of the elbow require recognition of the injury pattern followed by adequate treatment to allow early mobilisation. Not every injury requires surgery but if surgery is undertaken all structures providing stability should be addressed, including fractures, medial and lateral ligament insertion and the radial head. The current concepts of biomechanical modelling are addressed and surgical implications discussed.

Current concepts in elbow fracture dislocation

BACKGROUND

Elbow fracture dislocations are complex injuries that can provide a challenge for experienced surgeons. Current classifications fail to provide a comprehensive system that encompasses all of the elements and patterns seen in elbow fracture dislocations.

METHODS

The commonly used elbow fracture dislocation classifications are reviewed and the three-column concept of elbow fracture dislocation is described. This concept is applied to the currently recognised injury patterns and the literature on management algorithms.

RESULTS

Current elbow fracture dislocation classification systems only describe one element of the injury, or only include one pattern of elbow fracture dislocation. A new comprehensive classification system based on the three-column concept of elbow fracture dislocation is presented with a suggested algorithm for managing each injury pattern.

DISCUSSION

The three-column concept may improve understanding of injury patterns and treatment and leads to a comprehensive classification of elbow fracture dislocations with algorithms to guide treatment.

Clinical comparison of the over-the-top and flexor carpi ulnaris split approaches for the treatment of anteromedial facet fracture of the coronoid process

BACKGROUND

The flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU)-split approach and the over-the-top approach have been used frequently for the fixation of anteromedial facet (AMF) fractures of the coronoid process. Clinical studies have not compared functional recovery and complication rates associated with these approaches. This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of the over-the-top and FCU-split approaches for the treatment of AMF fractures of the coronoid process.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients who underwent surgery for AMF fractures between January 2013 and August 2019 were divided into the FCU-split and over-the-top groups. The FCU-split approach was used from January 2013 to March 2016, and the over-the-top approach was used from April 2016 to August 2019. Bony union, radiographic signs of osteoarthritis (Broberg and Morrey classification), and development of heterotopic ossification were evaluated. Postoperative pain score (visual analog scale at 2 days after the operation), surgical time (minutes), range of motion of the elbow, elbow function (Mayo Elbow Performance Score [MEPS]), and the presence of postoperative ulnar neuropathy were also compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The FCU-split and over-the-top approaches were performed in 15 and 17 patients, respectively. The mean age was 46 ± 13 years (range, 22-67 years), and the mean follow-up duration was 19± 6.7 months (range, 13-38 months). All coronoid fractures had a solid osseous union during the follow-up, and no subluxation or dislocation was observed in the 2 groups. The occurrence of heterotopic ossification and the grade of post-traumatic arthritis did not differ significantly between the groups (all P > .05). There were also no significant differences between the groups in terms of postoperative pain score, range of motion, and MEPS (all P > .05). However, the surgical time was shorter for the over-the-top approach than that for the FCU-split approach (79± 23 vs. 101 ± 14, P = .008), and the surgical time was significantly associated with the fracture classification and surgical approach (P = .001 and .003, respectively). In addition, postoperative ulnar neuropathy occurred less with the over-the-top approach than with the FCU-spilt approach (5.9% vs. 46%, P = .013).

CONCLUSION

Both the FCU-split and over-the-top approaches were appropriate for performing the buttress plate fixation for AMF fractures of the coronoid process and for restoring the elbow stability. The fixation of AMF fractures through the over-the-top approach was technically easier and had less incidence of postoperative ulnar neuropathy.

Morphological characteristics of fractures of the anteromedial facet of the coronoid in posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow: a three-dimensional CT remodeling study

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the anteromedial facet of the coronoid in posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow are classified into 3 subtypes based on their location. The purpose of this study was to analyze the fracture morphology of anteromedial facet fractures in their 3 subtypes (anteromedial rim, anteromedial rim + tip, and anteromedial rim + sublime tubercle [±tip]).

METHODS

Three-dimensional computed tomography remodeling was used to evaluate anteromedial facet fractures in a consecutive series of 40 patients, all of whom were affected by posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow. Characteristics of the fractures, including the number of fragments, size of fragments, plane of the fracture line, and involvement of the sublime tubercle and radial notch, were measured for each subtype of the anteromedial facet fractures.

RESULTS

Each subtype had a typical fracture pattern and distinct size. The fracture subtype 1 showed a single-fragment fracture, subtype 2 showed either a single- or dual-fragment fracture, and subtype 3 showed either a dual- or triple-fragment fracture. The angle between the fracture line and the coronal plane was greatest in subtype 3 fractures. The surface area of the fragment was largest in subtype 3 fractures. The percentages of articular involvement of the sublime tubercle were 0% in subtype 1, 47% in subtype 2, and 79% in subtype 3. The percentages of articular involvement of the radial notch were 0% in subtype 1, 7% in subtype 2, and 8% in subtype 3.

CONCLUSION

Analysis with quantitative 3-dimensional computed tomography showed the characteristic morphology of each subtype of anteromedial facet fracture. Subtype 1 comprised 1 fragment with the smallest fragment size. Subtype 2 was a single- or dual-fragment fracture, the size of which should be considered in the treatment plan. Subtype 3 was a large fragment comprising the sublime tubercle. Our findings are significant because they highlight unique fracture morphology that may help surgeons to distinguish one fracture subtype from another in clinical practice.

Proximal ulna fractures in adults: A review of diagnosis and management

Proximal ulna fractures are relatively common upper limb injuries, which may represent fragility fractures or result from high-energy trauma. These include fractures of the olecranon, coronoid and associated radial head dislocations. A wide variety of treatment options are available for the management of these injuries that makes the selection of most appropriate treatment difficult. We aim to provide a brief overview of the treatment options for such injuries.

Posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow: What the radiologist needs to know

Varus posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow joint is a relatively new subject described for the first time in 2003. It occurs secondary to axial loading of the elbow with varus force and internal rotation of the forearm. There is usually a specific pattern of osseous and soft tissue injuries that can be recognized on imaging. This includes an anteromedial coronoid fracture and avulsion of the lateral collateral ligament complex from its humeral attachment. Ulnar collateral ligament complex injury is also reported, particularly its posterior bundle which plays an important role in posteromedial elbow joint stability. There is high incidence of early osteoarthritis secondary to the resultant varus instability and increased contact pressure at the ulnohumeral joint. Surgical fixation of the coronoid fracture and ligamentous reconstruction maybe indicated to prevent this recurrent instability. The article reviews the key radiological features of posteromedial rotatory instability with multiple examples from different imaging modalities. The relevant anatomy of the elbow joint stabilising structures will be illustrated, in particular the coronoid process anatomy and the O'Driscoll classification for coronoid process fractures. Radiologists should be familiar with the imaging findings of posteromedial rotatory instability.

Management of anteromedial coronoid fractures according to a protocol focused on instability assessment provides good outcomes with infrequent need for coronoid fixation

BACKGROUND

Anteromedial coronoid fractures (AMCFs) are associated with persistent elbow instability and post-traumatic arthritis if managed incorrectly. It is unclear exactly which AMCFs require surgical intervention and how to make this decision. The aims of this study were to report outcomes of AMCFs managed using a protocol based on reproduction of instability using radiographic and clinical testing and to ascertain a threshold size of AMCF associated with instability.

METHODS

Forty-three AMCFs were studied. Thirty-two patients formed the primary study group (group A). All were treated using a protocol in which the decision to perform coronoid fixation was based on the presence of radiographic or clinical evidence of instability. Functional outcomes (Oxford Elbow Score), radiographic outcomes, complications, and reoperations were collected, and a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the optimal coronoid fracture height to recommend coronoid fixation. The results were compared with a historical group of 11 patients with AMCFs not treated according to the protocol (group B).

RESULTS

Of the patients, 23 had an isolated AMCF and 20 had a concurrent radial head injury. Complete nonoperative treatment of the elbow was performed in 16 patients (37%) (11 of 32 [34%] in group A vs. 5 of 11 [45%] in group B, P = .46). In 10 patients (23%), only repair of the lateral collateral ligament was performed (9 in group A and 1 in group B), whereas 8 patients (19%) underwent repair of the lateral collateral ligament and radial head fixation or replacement (6 in group A and 2 in group B). Acute coronoid fixation was performed in 9 patients (21%) (6 in group A and 3 in group B). At a mean follow-up of 20 months (range, 12-56 months), group A showed a significantly better Oxford Elbow Score (42 vs. 31, P = .02), lower complication rate (3 of 32 [9%] vs. 8 of 11 [72%], P < .001), and lower reoperation rate (1 of 32 [3%] vs. 6 of 11 [54%], P < .001) than group B. Persistent instability was found in 6 patients in group B and none in group A. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated 6.5 mm to be the optimal AMCF size for surgery to prevent persistent instability.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated according to a protocol in which preoperative reproduction of instability determined the degree of surgical intervention had good clinical and radiographic outcomes. Our study demonstrated that AMCFs > 6.5 mm are likely to be more unstable and require intervention. If these principles are followed, a specifically defined subset of AMCFs can be treated nonsurgically without adverse outcomes.

The treatment of anteromedial coronoid facet fractures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the anteromedial facet (AMF) of the coronoid process are caused by a varus posteromedial rotational injury force, leading to instability in the ulnohumeral joint. AMF fractures are usually accompanied by avulsion of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL). O'Driscoll's description and classification of AMF coronoid fractures has increased awareness and interest in this injury, but the optimal treatment has yet to be decided.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the available literature searching electronic databases, MEDLINE using the PubMed interface and Embase. The primary objective was to determine outcome scores but also complication and revision rates depending on the fracture and its therapy in order to gain a more comprehensive picture. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were applied.

RESULTS

Initially, 304 publications were identified. Finally, 10 studies were left for inclusion, all of them retrospective in design, comprising 128 patients; the majority of them were male (75.7%). A total of 114 patients (89.1%) were treated surgically and 14 patients (10.9%) were treated conservatively. Among the surgically treated patients, 70.2% were treated with LUCL refixation. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Score of the surgically treated patients was 91.5 points. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Score of the conservatively treated patients was 91.4 points. A total of 10 patients (7.8%) required reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Surgery of AMF fractures leads to a satisfactory functional outcome in the vast majority of patients independent of the subtype. An algorithm for LUCL fixation is still pending. Conservative treatment may be considered under strict preconditions, especially for nondisplaced subtype 1 and 2 fractures, as these fractures show satisfactory functional outcomes when treated nonoperatively.

Treatment of elbow instability: state of the art

The elbow is a congruent joint with a high degree of inherent stability, provided by osseous and soft-tissue constraints; however, when substantial lesions of these stabilising structures happen, instability of the elbow occurs. Significant improvements in surgical elbow instability diagnosis and treatment have been recently introduced both for acute and chronic cases. Specific stress tests, recently introduced in the clinical practice, and different imaging techniques, both static and dynamic, allow assessment of the elbow stabilisers and detection of the instability direction and mechanism even in subtle forms. Many surgical techniques have been standardised and surgical instruments and devices, specifically dedicated to elbow instability treatment, have been developed. Specific rehabilitation protocols have been designed to protect the healing of the elbow stabilisers while minimising elbow stiffness. However, despite the progress, surgical treatments can be challenging even for expert surgeons and the rate of persistent instability, post-traumatic arthritis, stiffness and pain can be still high especially in most demanding cases. The biology of the soft-tissue healing remains one of the most important aspects for future investigation. If future research will help to understand, correct or modulate the biological response of soft-tissue healing, our confidence in elbow instability management and the reproducibility of our treatment will tremendously improve. In this paper, the state of the art of the current knowledge of elbow instability is presented, specifically focusing on modern surgical techniques used to solve instability, with repair or reconstruction of the damaged elbow stabilisers.

[Treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture via a modified anteromedial approach]

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of a modified anteromedial approach in the treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture.

Methods

Between February 2017 and July 2018, 15 patients with ulna coronoid process fracture were reviewed. There were 9 males and 6 females, with an average age of 42.3 years (range, 24-60 years). The causes of injury included falling in 10 cases and traffic accidents in 5 cases, all cases were closed injury. According to the O'Driscoll classification, there were 4 cases of type Ⅰ, 6 cases of type Ⅱ, and 5 cases of type Ⅲ. The time from injury to operation was 2-8 days (mean, 3.7 days). All fractures were treated via a modified anteromedial approach between the pronator teres and the flexor carpi radialis plus with partial incision of flexor tendon aponeurosis. The fracture healing, muscle strength of forearm, postoperative complications were observed. At last follow-up, the elbow mobility were measured, the function of elbow was evaluated by Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS).

Results

All cases were followed up 10-18 months (mean, 13.3 months). Fracture union was achieved in all patients with a mean time of 10 weeks (range, 8-14 weeks). No obvious decrease of hand grip strength, nerve injury, and infection occurred. One patient had slight heterotopic ossification without special treatment. At last follow-up, all patients had stable elbows with good flexion-extension and varus-valgus stability, the mean flexion was 123.3° (range, 100°-140°), mean extension loss compared with that before operation was 6.7° (range, 0°-20°), mean pronation was 76.0° (range, 60°-85°), and mean supination was 75.8° (range, 55°-90°). The MEPS score was 65-100 (mean, 90.3) with the result of excellent in 10 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 1 case.

Conclusion

The treatment of ulnar coronoid process fracture via the modified anteromedial approach provides excellent exposure, minimal invasion, fewer complications, and satisfactory prognosis, which is conducive to elbow joint function recovery.

Soft tissue injury patterns in posteromedial rotatory instability with dislocation compared with posteromedial dislocation of the elbow joint

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine injury mechanisms and soft tissue injury patterns of dislocation caused by posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI) and simple posteromedial (PM) dislocation of the elbow joint that appear similar on simple radiographs.

METHODS

In this retrospective case-series study, we reviewed 13 patients with PMRI dislocation and 10 patients with simple PM dislocation. Three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were performed in both groups. The ulnar collateral ligament, lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC), overlying extensor muscle, and locus of bone contusion were identified. The direction of dislocation was categorized into the pure-posterior or PM type by simple radiographs.

RESULTS

The LCLC was completely ruptured in both groups. A completely torn ulnar collateral ligament was observed in 3 patients (23%) in the PMRI dislocation group and 9 patients (90%) in the simple PM dislocation group (P = .005). Regarding injury patterns of the LCLC and overlying extensor muscle, the distraction type was found in 10 patients (77%) and the stripping type was found in 3 patients (23%) in the PMRI dislocation group, whereas all patients (100%) in the simple PM dislocation group had the distraction type (P = .103). Bone contusion was observed at the posterolateral olecranon in 2 patients (15%) in the PMRI dislocation group and at the PM olecranon in 4 patients (40%), posterolateral olecranon in 1 (10%), posterior olecranon in 1 (10%), and PM-posterolateral olecranon in 1 (10%) in the simple PM dislocation group (P = .008). In the PMRI dislocation group, 7 patients (54%) had the PM type and 6 (46%) had the pure-posterior type.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple PM and PMRI dislocations of the elbow joint might have different soft tissue injury characteristics because of different injury mechanisms.

Functional outcomes after treatments for different types of isolated ulnar coronoid fracture: A protocol for systematic review

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatments for ulnar coronoid fracture have yet to be determined. We aimed to systematically review treatment efficacy assessed by functional outcomes of patients with isolated ulnar coronoid fracture.

METHODS

Medline, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for studies reporting quantitative outcomes data after surgical treatment for isolated ulnar coronoid fractures up to July 16, 2019. Functional outcomes determined using disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score; Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS); and range of motion were systematically reviewed.

RESULTS

Six studies with a total of 65 patients with isolated coronoid fracture who had received surgical treatment were included. All studies were of good quality according to a modified Delphi checklist. Most patients had Type II fractures based on Regan-Morrey or O'Driscoll classification. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scores were reported by 2 studies (mean range 5-17). Four studies reported MEPS (mean range 89-98). One study reported Broberg-Morrey scores, in which 93% patients achieved excellent or good outcomes. Five studies reported range of motion, with mean flexion ranging from 122 to 137 and mean extension ranging from 4.0 to 21 degrees. Quantitative analyses revealed that lateral, medial, or posterior approaches in treating Type II fractures are associated with higher postoperative MEPS and flexion scores than the anteromedial approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment efficacy assessed by functional outcomes for isolated ulnar coronoid fractures is overall satisfactory. Whether lateral, medial, or posterior approaches lead to more favorable outcomes than the anteromedial approach is inconclusive. Further prospective studies are warranted.

[Plate osteosynthesis of the coronoid process of the ulna]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of surgical treatment is reconstruction of the coronoid process' bony anatomy.

INDICATIONS

Large shear fractures of the coronoid process (Regan-Morrey type II-III, O'Driscoll "tip" subtype 2 and "basal" subtype 1-2) and fractures of the anteromedial facet (O'Driscoll "anteromedial" subtype 1-3) can occur isolated or as part of the "terrible triad" injuries to the elbow. Due to the resulting instability of these injuries, surgical reconstruction is generally indicated.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

In case of major accompanying soft tissue injuries to the elbow or an elbow infection, primary operative treatment using anatomical plate osteosynthesis is contraindicated.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Plate osteosynthesis of the coronoid process is performed through a medial approach (Hotchkiss or M. flexor carpi ulnaris split). After repositioning of the fracture fragments, a preformed anatomical plate can be fixed to the coronoid process.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

The arm is immobilized in an over-the-elbow cast until the wounds are dried. Afterwards, the elbow should preferably be treated functionally without varus or valgus stress.

RESULTS

Between January 2015 and July 2018, a total of 11 patients underwent osteosynthesis of the coronoid using anatomically preformed plate osteosynthesis. After a mean follow-up of 10.7 months, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score showed an excellent result with 78.89 points. The Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) score showed a median of 18.64 points with a mean functional arc of 118°.

Anterior capsule re-attachment in terrible triad elbow injury with coronoid tip fracture

BACKGROUND

During the surgical treatment of terrible triad elbow injury (TTEI), the usefulness of re-attaching the anterior joint capsule when the coronoid tip is fractured remains unclear. The primary objective of this study was to assess potential benefits during surgery for TTEI of re-attaching the joint capsule when the coronoid tip is fractured.

HYPOTHESIS

Re-attaching the anterior joint capsule in TTEI with a fractured coronoid tip improves clinical and radiological outcomes and decreases the complication and revision rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-centre retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery at the acute phase of TTEI with a fractured coronoid tip. In all patients, a physical examination and elbow radiographs were performed at least 1year after surgery. A statistical analysis was done to compare the groups with vs. without re-attachment of the anterior capsule and coronoid tip.

RESULTS

The study included 30 patients, 16 females and 14 males, with a mean age of 51years (range: 21-84years). Among them, 11 did and 19 did not undergo re-attachment. The two groups were comparable regarding demographic features and follow-up duration. No significant differences were found at last follow-up for flexion-extension motion arc (p=0.75), pronation-supination motion arc (p=0.3051), or the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (p=0.19). Radiographic evidence of humero-radial osteoarthritis was significantly more common in the absence of re-attachment (p=0.04), whereas no differences were evidenced regarding humero-ulnar osteoarthritis (p=0.73), the occurrence of subluxation or dislocation (p=0.43), or loosening of the radial head implant (p=0.47). The complication and revision rates were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, re-attaching the anterior capsule during the surgical treatment of TTEI with a coronoid tip fracture did not improve the clinical or radiographic outcomes after a mean follow-up of 54months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Clinical and radiological evaluation of surgical management in olecranon fracture-dislocations

PURPOSE

The treatment of olecranon fracture-dislocations (OFDs) remains challenging. OFDs are often misdiagnosed as Monteggia lesions, and the real frequency is actually higher. However, studies on OFDs are limited. This study aimed to report on the surgical management of OFDs and to highlight the importance of three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) evaluation in the treatment of OFDs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study participants included 18 patients (11 men, 7 women, mean age 44 years (range 24-78) with OFDs. Each patient's medical records, radiographs, and 3D CT scans were reviewed for demographics, injury details, operative findings, and information about radiological and functional outcomes. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the direction of the dislocation: the posterior dislocation group (group 1, 7 patients) and anterior dislocation group (group 2, 11 patients). The clinical evaluation was performed according to Broberg-Morrey and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow (ASES-E) scoring systems.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 39 months (range 25-62 months). The Broberg-Morrey results were excellent in 4, good in 9, fair in 3, and poor in 2 patients. The mean ASES-E score was 84.83 (range 48-100) points. There were signs of ulna-humeral arthrosis in 5 elbows. Arthrosis was graded as grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 in 3, 1, and 1 elbows, respectively. Partial sensory recovery was observed in one patient with postoperative ulnar neuropathy at the last follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

OFDs are complex injuries of the proximal ulna and may involve the radial head, coronoid process, and lateral collateral ligament. The effective treatment of OFDs begins with the proper identification of the injury with 3D CT. A secure fixation including the coronoid process is mandatory for the elbow joint stability. Insufficient restoration of the trochlear notch may lead to problems with loss of motion and arthrosis. Although an application of a pre-contoured locking anatomical olecranon plate can simplify the fixation procedure in most cases, the surgeons' equipment should also include radial head implant, coronoid plates, headless screws, small cannulated screw system, suture anchors, fluoroscopy, and articulated external fixator.

Buttress plate fixation of coronoid process fractures via a medial approach

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of coronoid process fractures surgically managed with buttress plate fixation via a medial approach.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all coronoid fractures surgically fixed in our institution using a buttress plate technique via a medial approach between June 2012 and April 2015 by the senior author was performed. These fractures were all sizeable fractures contributing to persistent elbow instability in terrible triad or varus posteromedial rotatory instability injury patterns. A prospective telephone questionnaire was conducted to assess patient outcomes using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score and Mayo hlbow performance score (MEPS).

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included in the study, comprising 10 males and 2 females with an average age of 39 years (range, 19-72 years). Mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 4-18 months). The average time to radiographic union was 4 months (range, 3-7 months). Range of motion measurements at final follow-up were obtained in 11 out of 12 patients, with one patient defaulting follow-up. All 11 patients displayed a functional elbow range of motion of at least 30°-130°, with an average arc of motion of 130° (range, 110° -140°), mean elbow flexion of 134° (range, 110° -140°) and mean flexion contracture of 3° (range, 0° -20°). The mean DASH score was 16 (range, 2.5-43.8) and the mean MEPS was 75 (range, 65-100). Complications observed included one patient with a superficial wound infection which resolved with a course of oral antibiotics and one patient with radiographic evidence of heterotopic ossification which was conservatively managed. No residual elbow instability was observed and no reoperations were performed.

CONCLUSION

Buttress plate fixation via a medial approach of coronoid process fractures that contribute to persistent elbow instability represents a reliable method of treatment that produces satisfactory and predictable outcomes.

Arthroscopically-assisted fixation of anteromedial coronoid facet fracture and lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair for acute posteromedial rotatory fracture dislocation of the elbow

If left untreated, varus posteromedial rotatory injuries of the elbow result in poor functional outcomes. Surgical treatment allows restoration of elbow kinematics, minimizing the chances of chronic varus instability and early onset osteoarthritis. However, large exposures are associated with extensive soft tissue stripping, a high risk of infection, nerve injury, poor visualization of the articular surface and longer recovery. Consequently, there has been renewed interest in the use of elbow arthroscopy to circumvent these problems. Arthroscopic treatment offers the potential advantage of a swift recovery, with instant rehabilitation, less stiffness and swelling than might be expected after open repair. We present the first combined arthroscopic-assisted anteromedial facet coronoid fracture fixation and lateral ulna collateral ligament repair in a varus posteromedial rotatory injury of the elbow.

Most coronoid fractures and fracture-dislocations with no radial head involvement can be treated nonsurgically with elbow immobilization

HYPOTHESIS

Conservative treatment of isolated coronoid fractures and fracture-dislocations focused on soft-tissue healing can provide good clinical results in the majority of patients. Our aims were (1) to evaluate the outcome of a conservative treatment protocol designed for isolated coronoid fractures with or without associated elbow dislocations (ICFs) and (2) to characterize the fractures with a dedicated image analysis protocol.

METHODS

Of 38 consecutive patients sustaining acute ICFs, 28 were treated nonsurgically after meeting specific inclusion criteria, prospectively followed up, and clinically evaluated at least 1 year after sustaining their injuries. All cases underwent elbow computed tomography scans with tri-plane and 3-dimensional reconstructions according to a specific protocol referenced to the proximal ulna.

RESULTS

The study included 15 male and 13 female patients, with a mean follow-up period of 32 ± 14 months (range, 12-61 months). An associated dislocation was presented in 8 (29%). Mean extension and flexion were 2° ± 8° (range, -10° to 30°) and 139° ± 11° (range, 110°-155°), respectively. Mean pronation and supination were 74° ± 3° (range, 60°-75°) and 83° ± 9° (range, 40°-85°), respectively. Of the patients, 78% rated their elbow as being normal or nearly normal. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 95 ± 9 (range, 70-100). The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 7 ± 13 (range, 0-57). The mean coronoid fracture height was 5.7 ± 1.2 mm (range, 3.7-7.9 mm). The mean percentage of coronoid height fractured was 33% ± 6% (range, 23%-43%). Mean fracture displacement was 2.7 ± 2 mm (range, 1-9 mm). Of the fractures, 23 (82%) were located at the anteromedial coronoid.

CONCLUSION

An ICF with a perfectly reduced ulnohumeral joint, a competent sublime tubercle, and a fractured coronoid height up to 50% can be treated without surgery with excellent or good results in more than 90% of cases regardless of the location of the fracture in the coronoid or the type of soft tissue-associated disruptions.

Posteromedial rotatory incongruity of the elbow: a computational kinematics study

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to analyze the effect of different anteromedial coronoid fracture patterns with different combinations of ligamentous repairs. We hypothesized that smaller fractures would be sufficiently treated with ligamentous repair alone but that larger fragments would require a combination of ligament and bony repair versus reconstruction.

METHODS

Two multibody models were created from cadaveric specimens in the ADAMS program. Four different conditions were simulated: (1) no fracture, (2) O'Driscoll anteromedial subtype I (2.5-mm) fracture, (3) subtype II 2.5-mm fracture, and (4) subtype II 5-mm fracture. In each of these conditions, 3 ligament repairs were studied: lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL), posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (pMCL), and both LUCL and pMCL. For each condition, kinematics and articular contact areas were calculated.

RESULTS

LUCL repair alone increases whereas pMCL repair decreases internal rotation of the ulna relative to all tested posteromedial rotatory instability conditions; their rotational effects are summative when both ligaments are repaired. With a subtype I fracture and both pMCL and LUCL injuries, repairing the LUCL alone corrects angulation whereas rotational stability is satisfactory through the arc from 0° to 90°. In a subtype II 2.5-mm fracture, isolated repair of the LUCL or pMCL is not capable of restoring rotation or angulation. For a subtype II 5-mm fracture, no combination of ligamentous repairs could restore rotation or angulation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that LUCL repair alone is sufficient to restore kinematics for small subtype I fractures for an arc avoiding deep flexion; whereas nearly normal kinematics throughout the arc of motion can be achieved if the pMCL is also repaired. Larger anteromedial coronoid fractures should ideally have fragments fixed in addition to ligament repairs.

Varus Posteromedial Rotatory Instability of the Elbow: Injury Pattern and Surgical Experience of 27 Acute Consecutive Surgical Patients

OBJECTIVES

To identify associated injuries that occur in varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI) of the elbow and present their surgical management.

DESIGN

Level II retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENT/PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-seven patients with VPMRI injuries treated surgically over an 8-year period.

INTERVENTION

Open reduction and internal fixation of anteromedial coronoid facet fracture, lateral collateral ligament repair, and associated injured soft-tissue repairs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURED

Radiographic classification, associated medial and lateral bony and soft-tissue injuries, surgical fixation method, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

According to the O'Driscoll classification, there were 15 (55%) type 2-2, 11 (41%) type 2-3, and 1 (4%) type 3-1 fractures. Lateral and medial collateral ligament tears were found in 100% and 63%, respectively. Common extensor and flexor origin injuries occurred in 19 (70%) and 2 (7%) elbows, respectively. A marginal radial head fracture was found in 1 patient. Most patients were treated with a combination of fixation methods. Complications occurred in 7 (26%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study documents both associated findings and surgical fixation methods. In all cases, the lateral collateral ligament was disrupted, often in association with an injured common extensor origin. Medial collateral ligament injuries are commonly involved. Radial head fractures are rarely associated. The surgeon should have a high index of suspicion if an isolated coronoid fracture is encountered. Clinical and functional outcome scores are needed in future studies to further inform treatment of VPMRI of the elbow.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anteromedial fractures of the ulnar coronoid process: correlation between surgical outcomes and radiographic findings

Background

This study aimed to report the radiographic findings and surgical outcomes of anteromedial facet (AMF) fracture of the ulnar coronoid process and to suggest an optimal approach.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 20 consecutive patients with unilateral AMF fracture of coronoid process were surgically treated and divided into two groups without (group A) and with (group B) additional proximal ulnar fractures in equal case number. Time from injury to surgery averaged 4.38 ± 2.56 weeks. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Shortened Disability of the Arm and Shoulder and Hand (quickDASH) score were used for functional evaluation. Cohen kappa coefficient (kappa) analysis was used to determine interobserver reliability on a radiographic reading.

Results

All cases had a mean follow-up of 2.3 years. MEPS at 2 years averaged 87.75 ± 12.51; quickDASH, 7.05 ± 6.19. A significantly higher MEPS was found in subtype 3 than in subtype 2 (p = 0.036) and in group B than in group A (p = 0.020). Significantly lower quickDASH cores were found in group B than in group A (p = 0.011). Kappa analysis showed moderate agreement in the O’Driscoll classification (kappa = 0.56) and substantial agreement in categorization of the additional proximal ulnar fractures (kappa = 0.76).

Conclusions

Additional proximal ulnar lesions were considered an integral part of varus posteromedial rotatory instability and required further categorization in the management of AMF fractures. Significantly better functional outcomes were achieved when those lesions were fully addressed.

Varus posteromedial rotatory instability: a biomechanical analysis of posterior bundle of the medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Recently, there has been growing interest in the involvement of the posterior bundle of the medial ulnar collateral ligament (pMUCL) in varus posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI). Varus PMRI has been observed clinically, but the degree of involvement of the pMUCL remains unclear. This study assessed the degree to which the pMUCL is involved in stabilizing the elbow and the feasibility of a pMUCL reconstruction to restore stability.

METHODS

Movements simulating PMRI were performed in 8 cadaveric elbows. Joint gapping values were obtained by 3-dimensional motion capture for the proximal and distal aspects of the ulnohumeral joint. Specimens were assessed at "intact," "cut coronoid + pMUCL," "reconstruction," and "cut anterior aspect MUCL + reconstruction" conditions with mechanical testing at 30°, 60°, and 90° of elbow flexion.

RESULTS

Proximal joint gapping significantly increased from intact to cut coronoid + pMUCL at 60° and 90°, and distal joint gapping significantly increased at 90°. In the reconstruction condition, joint gapping across the proximal joint at 60° and 90° significantly recovered, as did distal joint gapping at 90°. In the cut anterior aspect MUCL + reconstruction condition, no significant increase occurred in proximal or distal joint gapping.

CONCLUSIONS

Transection of the pMUCL with a coronoid fracture leads to increased joint gapping, suggesting the presence of PMRI. PMRI can still occur with an intact lateral ligamentous complex. A pMUCL tendon graft reconstruction confers some elbow stability in this injury mechanism.

[Research progress of posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow]

Objective

To summarize the research progress in posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI) of the elbow joint.

Methods

The recent researches about the management of PMRI of the elbow joint from the aspects of pathological anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, and therapy were analyzed and summarized.

Results

The most important factors related to PMRI of the elbow joint are lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) lesion, posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament complex (MCLC) lesion, and anteromedial coronoid fracture. Clinical physical examination include varus and valgus stress test of the elbow joint. X-ray examination, computed tomography, particularly three-dimensional reconstruction, are particularly useful to diagnose the fracture. Also MRI, arthroscopy, and dynamic ultrasound can assistantly evaluate the affiliated injury of the parenchyma. It is important to repair and reconstruct LCLC and MCLC and fix coronoid process fracture for recovering stability of the elbow joint. There are such ways to repair ligament injury as in situ repairation and functional reconstruction, which include direct suturation, borehole repairation, wire anchor repairation, and transplantation repairation etc. The methods for fixation of coronal fracture include screw fixation, plate fixation, unabsorbable suture fixation, and arthroscopy technology.

Conclusion

It is crucial that recovering the stability of the elbow joint and early functional exercise for the treatment of PMRI. Individual treatment is favorable to protect soft tissue, reduce surgical complications, and improve the functional recovery and the quality of life.

Articular Contact Area and Pressure in Posteromedial Rotatory Instability of the Elbow

BACKGROUND

Joint incongruity in posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI) has been theorized to determine early articular degenerative changes. Our hypothesis was that the articular contact area and contact pressure differ significantly between an intact elbow and an elbow affected by PMRI.

METHODS

Seven cadaveric elbows were tested under gravity varus stress using a custom-made machine designed to simulate muscle loads and allow passive elbow flexion (0° to 90°). The mean contact area and contact pressure data were collected and processed using the Tekscan sensor and software. After testing the intact specimen (intact elbow), a PMRI injury was simulated (PMRI elbow) and the specimen was tested again.

RESULTS

The PMRI elbows were characterized by initial joint subluxation and significantly elevated articular contact pressure. Both worsened, corresponding with a reduction in contact area, as the elbow was flexed from 0° until the joint subluxation and incongruity spontaneously reduced (at a mean [and standard error] of 60° ± 5° of flexion), at which point the mean contact pressure decreased from 870 ± 50 kPa (pre-reduction) to 440 ± 40 kPa (post-reduction) (p < 0.001) and the mean contact area increased from 80 ± 8 mm to 150 ± 58 mm (p < 0.001). This reduction of the subluxation was also followed by a shift of the contact area from the coronoid fracture edge toward the lower portion of the coronoid. At the flexion angle at which the PMRI elbows reduced, both the contact area and the contact pressure of the intact elbows differed significantly from those of the PMRI elbows, both before and after the elbow reduction (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The reduction in contact area and increased contact pressures due to joint subluxation and incongruity could explain the progressive arthritis seen in some elbows affected by PMRI.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This biomechanical study suggests that the early degenerative changes associated with PMRI reported in the literature could be subsequent to joint incongruity and an increase in contact pressure between the coronoid fracture surface and the trochlea.

Complex Elbow Dislocations and the "Terrible Triad" Injury

Background:

The elbow is the second most commonly dislocated joint in adults and up to 20% of dislocations are associated with a fracture. These injuries can be categorised into groups according to their mechanism and the structures injured.

Methods:

This review includes a literature search of the current evidence and personal experiences of the authors in managing these injuries.

Results:

All injuries are initially managed with closed reduction of the ulno-humeral joint and splinting before clinical examination and radiological evaluation. Dislocations with radial head fractures should be treated by restoring stability, with treatment choice depending on the type and size of radial head fracture. Terrible triad injuries necessitate operative treatment in almost all cases. Traditionally the LCL, MCL, coronoid and radial head were reconstructed, but there is recent evidence to support repairing of the coronoid and MCL only if the elbow is unstable after reconstruction of lateral structures. Surgical treatment of terrible triad injuries carries a high risk of complications with an average reoperation rate of 22%. Varus posteromedial rotational instability fracture-dislocations have only recently been described as having the potential to cause severe long-term problems. Cadaveric studies have reinforced the need to obtain post-reduction CT scans as the size of the coronoid fragment influences the long-term stability of the elbow. Anterior dislocation with olecranon fracture has the same treatment aims as other complex dislocations with the added need to restore the extensor mechanism.

Conclusion:

Complex elbow dislocations are injuries with significant risk of long-term disability. There are several case-series in the literature but few studies with sufficient patient numbers to provide evidence over level IV.

A figure-eight suture loop with Kirschner wires for fixation of anteromedial coronoid process fractures: A case series

•

Eleven cases with a fracture of the anterior or anteromedial facet of the coronoid process were treated by coronoid fixation using a figure-eight suture loop.

•

All 11 fractures were united at final follow-up with no joint incongruity, dislocation, or subluxation of the injured elbow.

•

The figure-eight suture pattern technique is an easy and effective technique to fix anterior or anteromedial facet fractures of the coronoid process.

Purpose

Sufficient fixation of an anterior or anteromedial facet fracture of the coronoid process in fracture-dislocation of elbow is important to maintain joint stability. The purpose of this study was to report our experience with 11 patients who were managed with an original fixation technique using a “figure-eight” suture loop.

Methods

From February 2010 to March 2011, 11 cases with a fracture of the anterior or anteromedial facet of the coronoid process were treated by coronoid fixation using a figure-eight suture loop. For cases with comminuted fractures, to prevent a suture from sliding into the fracture line, a 3- or 4-hole phalanx plate was enclosed in the suture loop to compress multiple fragments. Accompanying injuries, such as a radial head fracture or olecranon fracture, were fixed with repair of lateral collateral ligament injuries.

Results

On final evaluations at an average of 18 months after injury, the mean elbow arc of motion was 125.5° and the mean forearm rotation arc of 124.1°. All fractures were united with an average postoperative score according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index of 91 points. All patients achieved satisfactory scores (seven excellent, four good). All 11 fractures were united at final follow-up with no joint incongruity, dislocation, or subluxation of the injured elbow.

Conclusions

The figure-eight suture loop technique is an easy and effective technique to fix anterior or anteromedial facet fractures of the coronoid process.

Arthroscopic reduction and fixation of coronoid fractures with an exchange rod-a new technique

BACKGROUND

The ulnar coronoid process plays a central role in maintaining elbow stability. Some of its fractures were often combined with injury of bone and ligament. Arthroscopy enables perfect visualization to allow anatomical repair.

METHODS

From January 2012 to December 2013, six patients (four males, two females) with a mean age of 26.6 years were treated. The left and right ulnas were involved in two and four patients, respectively. All patients suffered from ipsilateral subluxation of the elbow without associated radial fracture. According to the Regan and Morrey fracture classification and O'Driscoll's classification, two and four patients were classified as type I and type II and as having tip fracture (O'Driscoll type I) and anteromedial fracture (O'Driscoll type II), respectively. Exchange rod technology via the elbow front center approach was used for reduction and fixation of fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna.

RESULTS

Intra- and postoperative X-ray examination showed that the fractures were satisfactorily fixed and that the screw and fracture line were vertical to each other. Follow-ups showed that the fractures had healed well, and the average elbow extension was -2° while the average flexion was 140°. No problems related to pronation or supination, elbow instability, or complications of blood vessels or nerves were reported. The elbows showed excellent results according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopy using an exchange rod can provide excellent visual exposure of the fractured joints, without the need for a large incision during the anatomical repair. Moreover, it protects the surrounding soft tissue, shows good stability of the components, and allows early rehabilitation exercises.

Controversies in Fractures of the Proximal Ulna

The olecranon process, coronoid process, and greater sigmoid notch are important components of the complex proximal ulna. Along with providing bony stability to the ulnohumeral joint, the proximal ulna serves as the attachment site of many important muscles and ligaments that impart soft tissue stability to the elbow joint. Management of proximal ulnar fractures continues to evolve as advances in imaging and anatomic and biomechanical studies have led to improvements in available implants; however, controversies remain, as shown in the current relevant literature.

[Chronic bony instability of the elbow joint]

The high stability of the elbow joint is provided by the congruent articular surfaces in combination with soft tissue stabilizers. The main osseous contributor of elbow stability is the coronoid, which is therefore referred to as a primary stabilizer. The radial head as a secondary stabilizer together with the medial collateral ligament assures valgus stability and together with the coronoid it assures posterolateral stability. Insufficiency of the osseous stabilizers may lead to difficulties in the treatment of chronic dislocation and complex instability. Thereby reconstruction of the osseous constraints of the elbow joint is not performed in isolation from addressing insufficient soft-tissue stabilizers. Bony stabilizers and reconstructional procedures are discussed in this review.