Shoulder arthroplasty in patients with immunosuppression following solid organ transplantation

Solid organ transplant patients do well after shoulder arthroplasty: a propensity matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are commonly prescribed immunosuppressive therapies which may predispose patients to higher infection and complication rates following total shoulder arthroplasty. This article aims to analyze the effects SOT and subsequent immunosuppressive regimens have on the functional and patient-reported outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasties.

METHODS

A single institution, multisurgeon retrospective case-control study investigating the functional and patient-reported outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty after SOT was conducted between the years of 2010 and 2020. To be included in the study, patients must have undergone SOT prior to primary total shoulder arthroplasty. A 4:1 match-paired control group lacking SOT prior to arthroplasty was then constructed. Thirty-four SOT patients (18 males and 16 females) and 136 control patients (77 male and 59 female) were included in the study. Patients were analyzed who underwent SOT prior to shoulder arthroplasty, with outcomes compared to controls that only underwent arthroplasty. The primary outcomes include range of motion and strength in forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation, and patient reported outcomes.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in improvement for range of motion and strength between the 2 cohorts, but within each cohort, improvement was statistically significant. In the SOT patients, forward elevation improved by 56° ± 52°, external rotation increased by 13° ± 20°, and internal rotation increased by 2 vertebral levels. In the non-SOT patients, forward elevation improved by 45° ± 51°, external rotation increased by 16° ± 25°, and internal rotation increased by 3 vertebral levels. SOT patients had equivocal visual analog scale pain and Simple Shoulder Test scores but lower American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (59 ± 13 vs. 79 ± 2; P = .002) and SANE (61 ± 30 vs. 84 ± 17; P < .001) scores than non-SOT patients. Complication rates were not significantly higher in the SOT group (15% vs. 6%; P = .05), but incidence of surgical revisions was not significantly different (SOT = 3%; non-SOT = 5%; P = .59).

CONCLUSION

Shoulder arthroplasty is a safe, effective surgical intervention for improving shoulder function in patients with a history of SOT. Despite being on chronic immunosuppressive regimens, our solid organ transplants had comparable clinical outcomes and revision rates, but higher complication rates.

The Influence of Solid Organ Transplant on Inpatient Complications, Length of Stay, and Hospital Costs in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Patients

INTRODUCTION

With innovations in transplant medicine and longer life expectancies in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, the incidence of shoulder arthroplasty is predictably rising in this population. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become increasingly popular due to advances in prosthetic design with expanded indications. While previous studies have examined shoulder arthroplasty in SOT patients, information specifically related to RSA patients is largely unexplored. We aim to analyze the demographics and characteristics of SOT patients who have undergone RSA while assessing inpatient complication rates, length of stay (LOS), and hospital costs in these patients compared to a matched cohort of non-transplant patients.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database was utilized to identify all patients undergoing RSA from 2016 to 2019. We generated propensity-matched groups based on pre-operative variables (diabetes, tobacco use, sex, age, and obesity) to compare complications, LOS, and inpatient costs between the SOT and control groups. T-tests and Chi-squared tests were performed where appropriate and odds ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 59925 patients who underwent RSA. Among those, 59769 patients (99.7%) did not have a SOT and 156 patients (0.26%) had a history of SOT. Patients in the SOT group were younger than the control group (67.0 versus 71.4 years, p<0.001). The SOT group were more likely males compared to the control group (53.8% versus 39.3%, p<0.001). Following 1:1 matching, there were 156 patients in each group. The SOT group had a higher risk of acute renal failure (ARF) compared to the control group (OR 9.41, 95% CI (2.13-41.49), p<0.001). The LOS (p<0.001) and inpatient costs (p<0.001) were higher in the SOT group.

CONCLUSION

For RSA, SOT patients are younger and more likely male compared to those without SOT. Inpatient medical and surgical complications are similar between SOT and non-SOT patients, except SOT patients have a higher risk of ARF. SOT patients tend to have longer LOS and higher inpatient costs than non-SOT patients.

Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Four joint arthroplasty registries (JARs) levels exist based on the recorded data type. Level I JARs are national registries that record primary data. Hospital or institutional JARs (Level II-IV) document further data (patient-reported outcomes, demographic, radiographic). A worldwide list of Level II-IV JARs must be created to effectively assess and categorize these data.

METHODS

Our study is a systematic scoping review that followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 648 studies. Based on their publications, the study aimed to map the existing Level II-IV JARs worldwide. The secondary aim was to record their lifetime, publications' number and frequency and recognise differences with national JARs.

RESULTS

One hundred five Level II-IV JARs were identified. Forty-eight hospital-based, 45 institutional, and 12 regional JARs. Fifty JARs were found in America, 39 in Europe, nine in Asia, six in Oceania and one in Africa. They have published 485 cohorts, 91 case-series, 49 case-control, nine cross-sectional studies, eight registry protocols and six randomized trials. Most cohort studies were retrospective. Twenty-three per cent of papers studied patient-reported outcomes, 21.45% surgical complications, 13.73% postoperative clinical and 5.25% radiographic outcomes, and 11.88% were survival analyses. Forty-four JARs have published only one paper. Level I JARs primarily publish implant revision risk annual reports, while Level IV JARs collect comprehensive data to conduct retrospective cohort studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study mapping all Level II-IV JARs worldwide. Most JARs are found in Europe and America, reporting on retrospective cohorts, but only a few report on studies systematically.

The Risk of Early Postoperative Complications Associated With Preoperative Immunosuppression in Patients Undergoing Total Elbow Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Patients considering total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) may be receiving immunosuppressive therapy; however, the relationship between immunosuppressive medications and postoperative complications is not well defined. Our purpose was to assess the relationship between preoperative immunosuppression and short-term complications following TEA.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was reviewed from 2005 to 2020 to identify patients undergoing TEA. Procedures indicated for malignancy or infection were excluded. Patients were grouped according to preoperative chronic immunosuppressive status. Demographic and operative characteristics were compared between groups. The 30-day incidence of complications and reoperations were compared between groups. Multiple logistic regression models, inverse-weighted by propensity scores, were used to calculate odds ratio (OR) of experiencing any complication or return to the operating room based on immunosuppression status and other demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 769 patients undergoing TEA were included, of whom 142 (18.5%) received chronic immunosuppression. Distribution of age, sex, race, body mass index, diabetes, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification differed significantly between groups. Most procedures were performed on an inpatient basis, and the median operative duration was 148 minutes. Most procedures were indicated for fracture in the nonimmunosuppressed group and rheumatoid arthritis in the immunosuppressed group. Overall complication rates were 7.0% for immunosuppressed patients and 10.2% for nonimmunosuppressed patients. The incidence of complications and reoperations did not significantly differ between groups. After controlling for confounding and adjusting for patient characteristics, immunosuppressed patients were 0.52 times less likely to experience a complication. Additionally, there was no association between immunosuppression status and odds of return to the operating room.

CONCLUSION

Similar rates of complications were observed following TEA, regardless of preoperative immunosuppression status. Chronic immunosuppression does not appear to increase the rates of postoperative complications for patients undergoing TEA.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

End-stage renal disease patients have comparable results to renal transplant patients after shoulder arthroplasty

Background

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) and renal transplant (RT) patients are known to have more perioperative and postoperative complications after arthroplasty surgeries when compared to patients without. We hypothesize that RT patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty (SA) have fewer systemic and surgical complications when compared to ESRD patients undergoing SA.

Methods

This was a retrospective review from the PearlDiver Patient Record Database. International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients who had undergone primary total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty, respectively, and subsequent surgical revisions. Unadjusted univariate analysis of patient demographics, Charlson Cormorbidty Index, and surgical complications at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years after was performed using chi-squared testing. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were subsequently performed for systemic complications and prosthesis outcomes at all time points.

Results

Of 1191 patients with ESRD or previous RT and who underwent either total shoulder arthroplasty or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, 1042 (87.5%) had ESRD and 149 (12.5%) had a previous RT. ESRD SA patients were more likely to have hypertension, liver disease, coronary artery disease, and hypothyroidism. Interestingly no statistical significance was found in multivariate analysis for systemic complications at 90 days, nor for surgical complications at the 90-day, 1-year, or 2-year mark between ESRD and RT cohorts.

Conclusion

SAs have comparable outcomes in ESRD and RT patients. The differing conclusions among studies might be partially accounted for by the demographic differences and comorbidities between these 2 patient populations. Providers should continue to provide appropriate counseling concerning risks, benefits, and timing of SA for these patients.

Shoulder arthroplasty following solid organ transplant: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

The purpose of this study is to report a systematic review and meta-analysis of solid organ transplant (SOT) patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty to compare functional and radiographic outcomes, demographics, and complications with non-transplant patients.

Methods

Studies were included if they examined patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of prior solid organ transplantation and included post operative range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, complications, or revisions. Studies were excluded if they were national database analyses or lacked clinical data. Pubmed, MEDLine, Scopus, and Web of Science were queried using relevant search terms in July 2022. Data was pooled, weighted, and a paired t-test and chi-square analysis was performed.

Results

There were 71 SOT and 159 non-SOT shoulders included in the study. The most common indication for surgery was avascular necrosis (n = 26) in the solid organ transplant group and osteoarthritis (n = 60) in the non-SOT group. Forward elevation, external rotation, ASES, and VAS pain scores improved significantly in both cohorts following surgery. There was no significant difference in age at surgery (p-value = 0.20), postoperative forward elevation (p-value = 0.08), postoperative external rotation (0.84), and postoperative ASES scores (p-value = 0.11) between the two cohorts. VAS pain scores were significantly lower in the SOT cohort (p-value<0.01). The risk of death was significantly higher in the SOT group (p-value<0.01). but the rate of overall complications (p = 0.47), surgical complication (p-value = 0.79), or revision surgery (p-value = 1.00) was not significantly different between the two cohorts.

Conclusion

Shoulder arthroplasty is a safe, effective option in patients following solid organ transplant. There is not an increased risk of adverse outcomes, and SOT patients had comparable range of motion and patient-reported outcomes when compared to their non-SOT peers.

Level of evidence

III.

Epidemiology and outcomes of bone and joint infections in solid organ transplant recipients

Bone and joint infection (BJI) epidemiology and outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) remain largely unknown. We aim to describe BJI in a multi-center cohort of SOTr (Swiss Transplant Cohort Study). All consecutive SOTr with BJI (01.05.2008-31.12.2019) were included. A nested case-control study to identify risk factors for BJI was performed. Among 4482 patients, 61 SOTr with 82 BJI were included, at an incidence of 1.4% (95% CI 1.1-1.7), higher in heart and kidney-pancreas SOTr (Gray's test p < .01). Although BJI were predominately late events (median of 18.5 months post-SOT), most infections occurred during the first year post-transplant in thoracic SOTr. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis was the most frequent infection (38/82, 46.3%), followed by non-vertebral osteomyelitis (26/82, 31.7%). Pathogens included Gram-positive cocci (70/131, 53.4%), Gram-negative bacilli (34/131, 26.0%), and fungi (9/131, 6.9%). BJI predictors included male gender (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.26-6.89) and diabetes (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.34-6.56). Treatment failure was observed in 25.9% (21/81) patients and 1-year mortality post-BJI diagnosis was 14.8% (9/61). BJI remain a rare event in SOTr, associated with subtle clinical presentations, high morbidity and relapses, requiring additional studies in the future.

Radiological changes, infections and neurological complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty related to different design types and their rates: Part II

Early reported complication rates with the Grammont-type reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were very high, up to 24%.A 'problem' is defined as an intraoperative or postoperative event that is not likely to affect the patient's final outcome, such as intraoperative cement extravasation and radiographic changes. A 'complication' is defined as an intraoperative or postoperative event that is likely to affect the patient's final outcome, including infection, neurologic injury and intrathoracic central glenoid screw placement.Radiographic changes around the glenoid or humeral components of the RSA are very frequently observed and described in the literature.High complication rates related to the Grammont RSA design led to development of non-Grammont designs which led to a dramatic fall in the majority of complications.The percentage of radiological changes after RSA is not negligible and remains unsolved, despite a decrease in its occurrence in the last decade. However, such changes should be now considered as simple problems because they rarely have a negative influence on the patient's final outcome, and their prevalence has dramatically decreased.With further changes in indications and designs for RSA, it is crucial to accurately track the rates and types of complications to justify its new designs and increased indications. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1109-1121. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210040.

Increased perioperative complication rates in patients with solid organ transplants following rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff repair is the second most common soft tissue procedure performed in orthopedics. Additionally, an increasing percentage of the population has received a solid organ transplant (SOT). The chronic use of immunosuppressants as well as a high prevalence of medical comorbidities in this population are both important risk factors when considering surgical intervention. The purpose of this study is to determine the demographic profile, comorbidity profile, and perioperative complication rate of SOT patients undergoing inpatient rotator cuff repair surgery compared to nontransplanted patients.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried from years 2002-2017 to identify all patients who underwent inpatient rotator cuff repair (n = 144,528 weighted). This group was further divided into SOT (n = 286 weighted) and nontransplant (n = 144,242 weighted) cohorts. Demographic and comorbidity analyses were performed between these groups. Additionally, a matched cohort of nontransplanted patients controlled for the year of procedure, age, sex, race, income, and hospital region was created in a 1:1 ratio to the SOT group (n = 286 each) for perioperative complication rate analysis.

RESULTS

Compared to nontransplanted patients, SOT patients were more likely to have at least 1 significant medical comorbidity (98% vs. 69%, P < .001), had a higher number of total comorbidities (3.1 vs. 1.4, P < .001), and had a higher Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index (2.6 vs. 0.54, P < .001). Compared to the matched cohort, SOT patients experienced longer hospital stays (2.9 vs. 1.8 days, P < .001), higher surgery costs ($12,031 vs. $8476, P < .001), and were more likely to experience a perioperative complication (24% vs. 3%, P < .001) with an odds ratio of 7.7 (95% confidence interval: 3.9-15.1).

CONCLUSION

Compared with nontransplanted patients, SOT patients undergoing rotator cuff repair had a significantly higher comorbidity index, longer hospital stays, costlier surgeries, and were >7 times more likely to experience a perioperative complication. With nearly a quarter of all SOT patients experiencing a perioperative complication following rotator cuff repair, careful consideration for surgery as well as increased postoperative surveillance should be considered in this unique population.

Shoulder arthroplasty in solid organ transplant patients: a retrospective, match paired analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have evaluated total hip and knee arthroplasty in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients; however, there are limited studies evaluating shoulder arthroplasty in SOT patients. This study compares the complications and functional outcomes of SOT patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty with a matched control group.

METHODS

The institution's database was retrospectively reviewed for patients with a history of SOT undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty (with minimum 2-year follow-up) and compared with a control group matched for age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical procedure. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion and outcome scores, perioperative surgical and medical complications, hospital length of stay, and mortality were compared.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with previous SOT underwent 19 shoulder arthroplasties. Thirty-four underwent 35 shoulder arthroplasties in the control group. At last follow-up, the SOT group had a significantly worse UCLA score. The SOT group had a significantly worse improvement in UCLA, active elevation, and passive elevation scores in pre- to postoperative scores. There was no difference in length of stay, infection, or surgical complications. Ninety-day readmissions, medically related complications, and required blood transfusion were significantly higher in the SOT group. There was increased mortality in the SOT compared with the control group (death occurred on average 1577 days after arthroplasty).

CONCLUSION

Shoulder arthroplasty in patients with previous SOT appears safe and effective for degenerative shoulder disorders. Patients should be counseled preoperatively that their range of motion and function may not improve as much as their nontransplant cohorts. SOT patients may have increased incidence of postoperative blood transfusions and medically related complications.

Periprosthetic Infection After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: a Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Periprosthetic infection is a relatively rare but potentially devastating complication after shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this article is to review the incidence, diagnosis, prevention, and management of periprosthetic infections after reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with a focus on literature published within the last 5 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection provides us with a framework for the diagnosis and management of periprosthetic infections after shoulder arthroplasty. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has a higher reported rate of infection compared with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Our current diagnostic tests do not appear to be as sensitive when compared with the hip and knee literature. Similar success has been reported with single and two-stage revision protocols, although prospective comparative data are lacking. The significance of unexpected positive cultures during revision arthroplasty remains unclear. We report current diagnostic and therapeutic options for periprosthetic infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Much of the current literature does not distinguish between anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Further high-level studies are warranted to refine these definitions and guide management.