Evaluation of the chemical constituents and potential biological activities of Cunninghamella blakesleeana

Rediscovering the chemistry of the Cunninghamella species: potential fungi for metabolites and enzymes of biological, industrial, and environmental values

Endophytic fungi have a strong affinity for producing the same or comparable compounds to those produced by their hosts. Herein, genetic diversity and environmental adaptation of the Cunninghamella species were briefly investigated. The genetic flexibility in Cunninghamella represents an evolutionary mechanism that allows them to respond effectively to environmental changes. The current review paid much attention toward the phytochemical screening of Cunninghamella sp., revealing the presence of alkaloids, unsaturated sterols, fatty acids, polyphenols, and quinones. The intensive investigations clarified that Cunninghamella sp. are distinguished in producing several numbers of fatty acids, in particular polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), in large quantities compared to other metabolites. The study demonstrated the effective role of Cunninghamella sp. in forming several bioactive metabolites owing to cytochrome P450 (CYP) that confirm significant value of such species for potential media biotransformation. The comparative investigations revealed that the isolation of flavonoids is yet to be reported, while the number of elucidated alkaloids and steroids is still limited. In contrast, successful results in the biotransformation of these metabolites were verified and showed a high affinity to convert simple substances to more valuable agents by Cunninghamella. The biomedical applications of naturally occurring compounds isolated from Cunninghamella were well documented; these included their antimicrobial, anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-Alzheimer, and antiaging properties. The antimicrobial activity was mostly attributed to the fatty acid contents in Cunninghamella sp. Moreover, tremendous attention was paid towards the agricultural and industrial usage of chitosan as it is one of the most crucial metabolites involved in wide applications. Chitosan is involved in food preservation for extending life storage period and utilized as biofertilizer, which enhances bacterial disease resistance. In addition, Cunninghamella is considered an important enzyme reservoir. Various Cunninghamella sp. produce several important enzymes, such as lignin peroxidase, catalase, cellulase, xylanase, laccase, and CYPs, that can be used for remediation, fertilization, preservation and medicinal purposes. Hence, further in-depth investigations are highly recommended to explore new insights into this potential reservoir of a wide spectrum of chemicals for industrial, medicinal, agricultural, and environmental applications.

Metabolomic Diversity in Polygonatum kingianum Across Varieties and Growth Years

Polygonatum rhizome is a traditional Chinese medicine of the same origin as food and medicine, and it has high economic value and social benefits. To screen the excellent germplasm resources of Polygonatum kingianum (P. kingianum) and clarify the nutritional and medicinal value of the rhizome of P. kingianum, we used widely targeted metabolomics to analyze the traits and metabolomics of rhizomes of different germplasms of P. kingianum from different growth years. The results showed that different germplasms and growth years of P. kingianum were rich in different nutritional and medicinal components. Among them, Polygonatum kingianum 'Linyun 1' rhizome (PWR) was richer in amino acids and derivatives, alkaloids, and phenolic acids, while Polygonatum kingianum rhizome (PRR) was richer in flavonoids, organic acids, and phenolic acids. Most of the differential compounds were mainly enriched in PRR when the growth year was one, and PWR had a greater variety and higher content of differential compounds in the third year, which also reflected the advantages of Polygonatum kingianum 'Linyun 1' (P. kingianum 'Linyun 1') as an excellent new variety of P. kingianum. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) metabolic pathway analysis showed that in P. kingianum with the same age and different germplasms, the significantly enriched metabolic pathway was more active in biosynthesis in PWR. In the same germplasm of P. kingianum from different years, the metabolites involved in PRR were mainly the highest in one-year-old P. kingianum (PR-1) or three-year-old P. kingianum (PR-3), and the metabolites involved in PWR were mainly the highest in three-year-old P. kingianum 'Linyun 1' (PW-3). The above results showed that the three-year-old PWR had more advantages based on chemical substances. Therefore, this study provided a new theoretical reference for the development of P. kingianum products and the breeding of new varieties.

Santiago ALCM, Saxena RK, Schoutteten N, Wimalasena MK, Aleoshin VV, Al-Hatmi AMS, Ariyawansa KGSU, Assunção AR, Bamunuarachchige TC, Baral HO, Bhat DJ, Błaszkowski J, Boekhout T, Boonyuen N, Brysch-Herzberg M, Cao B, Cazabonne J, Chen XM, Coleine C, Dai DQ, Daniel HM, da Silva SBG, de Souza FA, Dolatabadi S, Dubey MK, Dutta AK, Ediriweera A, Egidi E, Elshahed MS, Fan X, Felix JRB, Galappaththi MCA, Groenewald M, Han LS, Huang B, Hurdeal VG, Ignatieva AN, Jerônimo GH, de Jesus AL, Kondratyuk S, Kumla J, Kukwa M, Li Q, Lima JLR, Liu XY, Lu W, Lumbsch HT, Madrid H, Magurno F, Marson G, McKenzie EHC, Menkis A, Mešić A, Nascimento ECR, Nassonova ES, Nie Y, Oliveira NVL, Ossowska EA, Pawłowska J, Peintner U, Pozdnyakov IR, Premarathne BM, Priyashantha AKH, Quandt CA, Queiroz MB, Rajeshkumar KC, Raza M, Roy N, Samarakoon MC, Santos AA, Santos LA, Schumm F, Selbmann L, Selçuk F, Simmons DR, Simakova AV, Smith MT, Sruthi OP, Suwannarach N, Tanaka K, Tibpromma S, Tomás EO, Ulukapı M, Van Vooren N, Wanasinghe DN, Weber E, Wu Q, Yang EF, Yoshioka R, Youssef NH, Zandijk A, Zhang GQ, Zhang JY, Zhao H, Zhao R, Zverkov OA, Thines M, Karpov SA. Classes and phyla of the kingdom Fungi

Fungi are one of the most diverse groups of organisms with an estimated number of species in the range of 2–3 million. The higher-level ranking of fungi has been discussed in the framework of molecular phylogenetics since Hibbett et al., and the definition and the higher ranks (e.g., phyla) of the ‘true fungi’ have been revised in several subsequent publications. Rapid accumulation of novel genomic data and the advancements in phylogenetics now facilitate a robust and precise foundation for the higher-level classification within the kingdom. This study provides an updated classification of the kingdom Fungi, drawing upon a comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of Holomycota, with which we outline well-supported nodes of the fungal tree and explore more contentious groupings. We accept 19 phyla of Fungi, viz. Aphelidiomycota, Ascomycota, Basidiobolomycota, Basidiomycota, Blastocladiomycota, Calcarisporiellomycota, Chytridiomycota, Entomophthoromycota, Entorrhizomycota, Glomeromycota, Kickxellomycota, Monoblepharomycota, Mortierellomycota, Mucoromycota, Neocallimastigomycota, Olpidiomycota, Rozellomycota, Sanchytriomycota, and Zoopagomycota. In the phylogenies, Caulochytriomycota resides in Chytridiomycota; thus, the former is regarded as a synonym of the latter, while Caulochytriomycetes is viewed as a class in Chytridiomycota. We provide a description of each phylum followed by its classes. A new subphylum, Sanchytriomycotina Karpov is introduced as the only subphylum in Sanchytriomycota. The subclass Pneumocystomycetidae Kirk et al. in Pneumocystomycetes, Ascomycota is invalid and thus validated. Placements of fossil fungi in phyla and classes are also discussed, providing examples.

What are the 100 most cited fungal genera?

The global diversity of fungi has been estimated between 2 to 11 million species, of which only about 155 000 have been named. Most fungi are invisible to the unaided eye, but they represent a major component of biodiversity on our planet, and play essential ecological roles, supporting life as we know it. Although approximately 20 000 fungal genera are presently recognised, the ecology of most remains undetermined. Despite all this diversity, the mycological community actively researches some fungal genera more commonly than others. This poses an interesting question: why have some fungal genera impacted mycology and related fields more than others? To address this issue, we conducted a bibliometric analysis to identify the top 100 most cited fungal genera. A thorough database search of the Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed was performed to establish which genera are most cited. The most cited 10 genera are Saccharomyces, Candida, Aspergillus, Fusarium, Penicillium, Trichoderma, Botrytis, Pichia, Cryptococcus and Alternaria. Case studies are presented for the 100 most cited genera with general background, notes on their ecology and economic significance and important research advances. This paper provides a historic overview of scientific research of these genera and the prospect for further research. Citation: Bhunjun CS, Chen YJ, Phukhamsakda C, Boekhout T, Groenewald JZ, McKenzie EHC, Francisco EC, Frisvad JC, Groenewald M, Hurdeal VG, Luangsa-ard J, Perrone G, Visagie CM, Bai FY, Błaszkowski J, Braun U, de Souza FA, de Queiroz MB, Dutta AK, Gonkhom D, Goto BT, Guarnaccia V, Hagen F, Houbraken J, Lachance MA, Li JJ, Luo KY, Magurno F, Mongkolsamrit S, Robert V, Roy N, Tibpromma S, Wanasinghe DN, Wang DQ, Wei DP, Zhao CL, Aiphuk W, Ajayi-Oyetunde O, Arantes TD, Araujo JC, Begerow D, Bakhshi M, Barbosa RN, Behrens FH, Bensch K, Bezerra JDP, Bilański P, Bradley CA, Bubner B, Burgess TI, Buyck B, Čadež N, Cai L, Calaça FJS, Campbell LJ, Chaverri P, Chen YY, Chethana KWT, Coetzee B, Costa MM, Chen Q, Custódio FA, Dai YC, Damm U, de Azevedo Santiago ALCM, De Miccolis Angelini RM, Dijksterhuis J, Dissanayake AJ, Doilom M, Dong W, Alvarez-Duarte E, Fischer M, Gajanayake AJ, Gené J, Gomdola D, Gomes AAM, Hausner G, He MQ, Hou L, Iturrieta-González I, Jami F, Jankowiak R, Jayawardena RS, Kandemir H, Kiss L, Kobmoo N, Kowalski T, Landi L, Lin CG, Liu JK, Liu XB, Loizides M, Luangharn T, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Makhathini Mkhwanazi GJ, Manawasinghe IS, Marin-Felix Y, McTaggart AR, Moreau PA, Morozova OV, Mostert L, Osiewacz HD, Pem D, Phookamsak R, Pollastro S, Pordel A, Poyntner C, Phillips AJL, Phonemany M, Promputtha I, Rathnayaka AR, Rodrigues AM, Romanazzi G, Rothmann L, Salgado-Salazar C, Sandoval-Denis M, Saupe SJ, Scholler M, Scott P, Shivas RG, Silar P, Souza-Motta CM, Silva-Filho AGS, Spies CFJ, Stchigel AM, Sterflinger K, Summerbell RC, Svetasheva TY, Takamatsu S, Theelen B, Theodoro RC, Thines M, Thongklang N, Torres R, Turchetti B, van den Brule T, Wang XW, Wartchow F, Welti S, Wijesinghe SN, Wu F, Xu R, Yang ZL, Yilmaz N, Yurkov A, Zhao L, Zhao RL, Zhou N, Hyde KD, Crous PW (2024). What are the 100 most cited fungal genera? Studies in Mycology 108: 1-411. doi: 10.3114/sim.2024.108.01.