Tracheostomy after severe ischemic stroke: a population-based study

Prediction Model for Early Subacute Phase Tracheostomy Decannulation in Patients with Stroke

Objective: This study aims to identify the factors influencing decannulation in patients with stroke who underwent tracheostomy during the early subacute phase. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 219 patients with stroke who underwent a tracheostomy at a tertiary hospital between January 2020 and December 2023. Among them, there were 155 males and 64 females. The age distribution ranged from 13 to 90 years old (average, 54.32 ± 14.96). There were 189 patients diagnosed with cerebral hemorrhage and 30 patients diagnosed with cerebral infarction. The patients were categorized into 2 groups: Those who achieved decannulation during the early subacute phase and those who did not. The decannulation group comprised 69 individuals, while the non-decannulation group comprised 150 individuals. Data collected included general patient demographics, stroke types, levels of consciousness, the presence of airway polyps, and outcomes of the modified Evan's blue dye test (MEBDT). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify independent factors influencing early decannulation. The predictive value of these factors was further evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Logistic regression analysis identified Glasgow Coma Scale scores, MEBDT results, and cough ability as independent factors influencing decannulation. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that a predictive model incorporating these 3 factors had a high predictive accuracy, with an AUC of 0.975 (P < .001, 95% CI 0.958-0.993). The model's cut-off value of 0.19 yielded a sensitivity of 95.6% and a specificity of 87.3%. Conclusion: The Glasgow Coma Scale score, MEBDT results, and cough ability are independent determinants of early decannulation is patients with stroke. The combined assessment of these factors offers strong predictive accuracy for early decannulation.

Perioperative care of patients with recent stroke undergoing nonemergent, nonneurological, noncardiac, nonvascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of published literature regarding postoperative stroke and mortality in patients with a history of stroke and to provide a framework for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care in an elective setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with nonneurological, noncardiac, and nonvascular surgery within three months after stroke have a 153-fold risk, those within 6 months have a 50-fold risk, and those within 12 months have a 20-fold risk of postoperative stroke. There is a 12-fold risk of in-hospital mortality within three months and a three-to-four-fold risk of mortality for more than 12 months after stroke. The risk of stroke and mortality continues to persist years after stroke. Recurrent stroke is common in patients in whom anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy is discontinued. Stroke and time elapsed after stroke should be included in the preoperative assessment questionnaire, and a stroke-specific risk assessment should be performed before surgical planning is pursued.

SUMMARY

In patients with a history of a recent stroke, anesthesiology, surgery, and neurology experts should create a shared mental model in which the patient/surrogate decision-maker is informed about the risks and benefits of the proposed surgical procedure; secondary-stroke-prevention medications are reviewed; plans are made for interruptions and resumption; and intraoperative care is individualized to reduce the likelihood of postoperative stroke or death.

Early tracheostomy in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke

PURPOSE

Respiratory failure following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a known complication, and requirement of tracheostomy is associated with worse outcomes. Our objective is to evaluate characteristics associated with tracheostomy timing in AIS patients treated with MT.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample was queried for adult patients treated with MT for AIS from 2016 to 2019. Baseline demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and inpatient outcomes were analyzed for associations in patients who received tracheostomy. Timing of early tracheostomy (ETR) was defined as placement before day 8 of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Of 3505 AIS-MT patients who received tracheostomy, 915 (26.1%) underwent ETR. Patients who underwent ETR had shorter length of stay (LOS) (25.39 days vs 32.43 days, p < 0.001) and lower total hospital charges ($483,472.07 vs $612,362.86, p < 0.001). ETR did not confer a mortality benefit but was associated with less acute kidney injury (OR, 0.697; p = 0.013), pneumonia (OR, 0.449; p < 0.001), and sepsis (OR, 0.536; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

An expected increase in complications and healthcare resource utilization is seen in AIS-MT patients receiving tracheostomy, likely reflecting the severity of patients' post-stroke neurologic injury. Among these high-risk patients, ETR was predictive of shorter LOS and fewer complications.

Tracheostomy timing and outcome in critically ill patients with stroke: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Stroke patients requiring mechanical ventilation often have a poor prognosis. The optimal timing of tracheostomy and its impact on mortality in stroke patients remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of tracheostomy timing and its association with reported all-cause overall mortality. Secondary outcomes were the effect of tracheostomy timing on neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS), hospital length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS.

METHODS

We searched 5 databases for entries related to acute stroke and tracheostomy from inception to 25 November 2022. We adhered to PRISMA guidance for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Selected studies included (1) ICU-admitted patients who had stroke (either acute ischaemic stroke, AIS or intracerebral haemorrhage, ICH) and received a tracheostomy (with known timing) during their stay and (2) > 20 tracheotomised. Studies primarily reporting sub-arachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) were excluded. Where this was not possible, adjusted meta-analysis and meta-regression with study-level moderators were performed. Tracheostomy timing was analysed continuously and categorically, where early (< 5 days from initiation of mechanical ventilation to tracheostomy) and late (> 10 days) timing was defined per the protocol of SETPOINT2, the largest and most recent randomised controlled trial on tracheostomy timing in stroke patients.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies involving 17,346 patients (mean age = 59.8 years, female 44%) met the inclusion criteria. ICH, AIS, and SAH comprised 83%, 12%, and 5% of known strokes, respectively. The mean time to tracheostomy was 9.7 days. Overall reported all-cause mortality (adjusted for follow-up) was 15.7%. One in five patients had good neurological outcome (mRS 0-3; median follow-up duration was 180 days). Overall, patients were ventilated for approximately 12 days and had an ICU LOS of 16 days and a hospital LOS of 28 days. A meta-regression analysis using tracheostomy time as a continuous variable showed no statistically significant association between tracheostomy timing and mortality (β = - 0.3, 95% CI = - 2.3 to 1.74, p = 0.8). Early tracheostomy conferred no mortality benefit when compared to late tracheostomy (7.8% vs. 16.4%, p = 0.7). Tracheostomy timing was not associated with secondary outcomes (good neurological outcome, ICU LOS and hospital LOS).

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis of over 17,000 critically ill stroke patients, the timing of tracheostomy was not associated with mortality, neurological outcomes, or ICU/hospital LOS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO-CRD42022351732 registered on 17th of August 2022.

Medical management of cerebral edema in large hemispheric infarcts

Acute ischemic stroke confers a high burden of morbidity and mortality globally. Occlusion of large vessels of the anterior circulation, namely the intracranial carotid artery and middle cerebral artery, can result in large hemispheric stroke in ~8% of these patients. Edema from stroke can result in a cascade effect leading to local compression of capillary perfusion, increased stroke burden, elevated intracranial pressure, herniation and death. Mortality from large hemispheric stroke is generally high and surgical intervention may reduce mortality and improve good outcomes in select patients. For those patients who are not eligible candidates for surgical decompression either due timing, medical co-morbidities, or patient and family preferences, the mainstay of medical management for cerebral edema is hyperosmolar therapy. Other neuroprotectants for cerebral edema such as glibenclamide are under investigation. This review will discuss current guidelines and evidence for medical management of cerebral edema in large hemispheric stroke as well as discuss important neuromonitoring and critical care management targeted at reducing morbidity and mortality for these patients.

Effect of Early vs Standard Approach to Tracheostomy on Functional Outcome at 6 Months Among Patients With Severe Stroke Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: The SETPOINT2 Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Many patients with severe stroke have impaired airway protective reflexes, resulting in prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether early vs standard tracheostomy improved functional outcome among patients with stroke receiving mechanical ventilation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this randomized clinical trial, 382 patients with severe acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke receiving invasive ventilation were randomly assigned (1:1) to early tracheostomy (≤5 days of intubation) or ongoing ventilator weaning with standard tracheostomy if needed from day 10. Patients were randomized between July 28, 2015, and January 24, 2020, at 26 US and German neurocritical care centers. The final date of follow-up was August 9, 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were assigned to an early tracheostomy strategy (n = 188) or to a standard tracheostomy (control group) strategy (n = 194).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was functional outcome at 6 months, based on the modified Rankin Scale score (range, 0 [best] to 6 [worst]) dichotomized to a score of 0 (no disability) to 4 (moderately severe disability) vs 5 (severe disability) or 6 (death).

RESULTS

Among 382 patients randomized (median age, 59 years; 49.8% women), 366 (95.8%) completed the trial with available follow-up data on the primary outcome (177 patients [94.1%] in the early group; 189 patients [97.4%] in the standard group). A tracheostomy (predominantly percutaneously) was performed in 95.2% of the early tracheostomy group in a median of 4 days after intubation (IQR, 3-4 days) and in 67% of the control group in a median of 11 days after intubation (IQR, 10-12 days). The proportion without severe disability (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-4) at 6 months was not significantly different in the early tracheostomy vs the control group (43.5% vs 47.1%; difference, -3.6% [95% CI, -14.3% to 7.2%]; adjusted odds ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.60-1.42]; P = .73). Of the serious adverse events, 5.0% (6 of 121 reported events) in the early tracheostomy group vs 3.4% (4 of 118 reported events) were related to tracheostomy.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with severe stroke receiving mechanical ventilation, a strategy of early tracheostomy, compared with a standard approach to tracheostomy, did not significantly improve the rate of survival without severe disability at 6 months. However, the wide confidence intervals around the effect estimate may include a clinically important difference, so a clinically relevant benefit or harm from a strategy of early tracheostomy cannot be excluded.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02377167.

Predictive Factors for the Need of Tracheostomy in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Being Treated With Mechanical Thrombectomy

Background: Patients with large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) eligible for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are at risk for stroke- and non-stroke-related complications resulting in the need for tracheostomy (TS). Risk factors for TS have not yet been systematically investigated in this subgroup of stroke patients.

Methods: Prospectively derived data from patients with LVOS and MT being treated in a large, academic neurological ICU (neuro-ICU) between 2014 and 2019 were analyzed in this single-center study. Predictive value of peri- and post-interventional factors, stroke imaging, and pre-stroke medical history were investigated for their potential to predict tracheostomy during ICU stay using logistic regression models.

Results: From 635 LVOS-patients treated with MT, 40 (6.3%) underwent tracheostomy during their neuro-ICU stay. Patients receiving tracheostomy were younger [71 (62–75) vs. 77 (66–83), p < 0.001], had a higher National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at baseline [18 (15–20) vs. 15 (10–19), p = 0.009] as well as higher rates of hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) [39 (97.5%) vs. 224 (37.6%), p < 0.001], failed extubation [15 (37.5%) vs. 19 (3.2%), p < 0.001], sepsis [11 (27.5%) vs. 16 (2.7%), p < 0.001], symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage [5 (12.5%) vs. 22 (3.9%), p = 0.026] and decompressive hemicraniectomy (DH) [19 (51.4%) vs. 21 (3.8%), p < 0.001]. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, HAP (OR 21.26 (CI 2.76–163.56), p = 0.003], Sepsis [OR 5.39 (1.71–16.91), p = 0.004], failed extubation [OR 8.41 (3.09–22.93), p < 0.001] and DH [OR 9.94 (3.92–25.21), p < 0.001] remained as strongest predictors for TS. Patients with longer periods from admission to TS had longer ICU length of stay (r = 0.384, p = 0.03). There was no association between the time from admission to TS and clinical outcome (NIHSS at discharge: r = 0.125, p = 0.461; mRS at 90 days: r = −0.179, p = 0.403).

Conclusions: Patients with LVOS undergoing MT are at high risk to require TS if extubation after the intervention fails, DH is needed, and severe infectious complications occur in the acute phase after ischemic stroke. These factors are likely to be useful for the indication and timing of TS to reduce overall sedation and shorten ICU length of stay.

Rates and Trends of Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With Status Epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

Among patients with status epilepticus, we sought to determine the rate of endotracheal intubation, identify the physician specialties responsible for endotracheal intubation, and characterize the trend in use of endotracheal intubation over the last 20 years.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study using data from 2 sources. First, we used inpatient claims between 2009 and 2015 from a nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries. Patients with status epilepticus were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes, and those who underwent endotracheal intubation were identified based on Current Procedural Terminology codes. Medical specialties of providers performing intubation were identified based on Healthcare Provider Taxonomy Codes. Second, we used claims data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to estimate the annual rates and trends of endotracheal intubation and tracheostomy among patients with status epilepticus from 1995 to 2014.

RESULTS

Among 1971 Medicare beneficiaries with status epilepticus, 566 (29%) patients underwent endotracheal intubation. 375 (66%) patients were intubated on admission. The most common medical providers performing intubation in patients with status epilepticus were emergency medicine physicians (50.4%), anesthesiologists (16.4%), and pulmonary medicine physicians (10.1%). Neurologists accounted for 1.7% of all intubations. Among individuals with status epilepticus identified in the NIS, 248 681 (41.7%) were intubated. The proportion of patients intubated increased from 29.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.8%-31.3%, P = .018) in 1995 to 50.8% (95% CI: 49.6%-52%, P = .012) in 2014. The proportion of patients with status epilepticus who underwent tracheostomy increased from 2.2% (95% CI: 1.7%-2.7%, P = .005) in 1995 to 3.4% (95% CI: 3%-3.9%, P = .004) in 2014.

SIGNIFICANCE

Approximately 1 in 3 patients with status epilepticus undergo endotracheal intubation. Over the last 20 years, the proportion of patients with status epilepticus undergoing endotracheal intubation has almost doubled. Neurologists perform a small percentage of these intubations.

Trends in Tracheostomy After Stroke: Analysis of the 1994 to 2013 National Inpatient Sample

BACKGROUND

Real-world data on long-term trends in the use of tracheostomy after stroke are limited.

METHODS

Patients who underwent tracheostomy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) were identified from the 1994 through 2013 releases of the National Inpatient Sample using previously validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Survey weights were used to report nationally representative estimates. Our primary outcome was the trend in tracheostomy use during the index stroke hospitalization over the last 20 years. Additionally, we evaluated trends in in-hospital mortality, timing of placement, and discharge disposition among patients who received a tracheostomy.

RESULTS

We identified 9.9 million patients with AIS, ICH, or SAH in the United States from 1994 to 2013, of which 170 255 (1.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6%-1.8%) underwent tracheostomy. Among all patients with stroke, tracheostomy use increased from 1.2% (95% CI: 1.1%-1.4%) in 1994 to 1.9% (95% CI: 1.8%-2.1%) in 2013, with similar trends across stroke types. From 1994 to 2013, the timing of tracheostomy decreased from 16.5 days (95% CI: 14.9-18.1 days) to 10.3 days (95% CI: 9.9-10.8 days) after mechanical ventilation. In-hospital mortality decreased from 32.6% (95% CI: 29.1%-36.1%) to 13.8% (95% CI: 12.3%-15.3%) among tracheostomy patients; however, discharge to a nonacute care facility increased from 42.9% (95% CI: 38.0%-47.8%) to 83.3% (95% CI: 81.6%-85.0%) and home discharge declined from 9.3% (95% CI: 7.3%-11.3%) to 2.9% (95% CI: 2.1%-3.7%).

CONCLUSION

Over the past 2 decades, tracheostomy use has increased among patients with stroke. This increase was associated with earlier placement, reduced in-hospital mortality, and lower rates of home discharge.

Pharyngeal electrical stimulation for early decannulation in tracheotomised patients with neurogenic dysphagia after stroke (PHAST-TRAC): a prospective, single-blinded, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia after stroke is common, especially in severely affected patients who have had a tracheotomy. In a pilot trial, pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) improved swallowing function in this group of patients. We aimed to replicate and extend this single-centre experience.

METHODS

We did a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial across nine sites (seven acute care hospitals, two rehabilitation facilities) in Germany, Austria, and Italy. Patients with recent stroke who required tracheotomy were randomly assigned to receive 3 days of either PES or sham treatment (1:1). All patients had the stimulation catheter inserted; sham treatment was applied by connecting the PES base station to a simulator box instead of the catheter. Randomisation was done via a computerised interactive system (stratified by site) in blocks of four patients per site. Patients and investigators applying PES were not masked. The primary endpoint was assessed by a separate investigator at each site who was masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was readiness for decannulation 24-72 h after treatment, assessed using fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and based on a standardised protocol, including absence of massive pooling of saliva, presence of one or more spontaneous swallows, and presence of at least minimum laryngeal sensation. We planned a sequential statistical analysis of superiority for the primary endpoint. Interim analyses were to be done after primary outcome data were available for 50 patients (futility), 70 patients, and every additional ten patients thereafter, up to 140 patients. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN18137204.

FINDINGS

From May 29, 2015, to July 5, 2017, of 81 patients assessed, 69 patients from nine sites were randomly assigned to receive PES (n=35) or sham (n=34) treatment. Median onset to randomisation time was 28 days (IQR 19-41; PES 28 [20-49]; sham 28 [18-40]). The Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board recommended that the trial was stopped early for efficacy after 70 patients had been recruited and primary endpoint data for 69 patients were available. This decision was approved by the steering committee. More patients were ready for decannulation in the PES group (17 [49%] of 35 patients) than in the sham group (three [9%] of 34 patients; odds ratio [OR] 7·00 [95% CI 2·41-19·88]; p=0·0008). Adverse events were reported in 24 (69%) patients in the PES group and 24 (71%) patients in the sham group. The number of patients with at least one serious adverse event did not differ between the groups (ten [29%] patients in the PES group vs eight [23%] patients in the sham group; OR 1·30 [0·44-3·83]; p=0·7851). Seven (20%) patients in the PES group and three (9%) patients in the sham group died during the study period (OR 2·58 [0·61-10·97]; p=0·3059). None of the deaths or serious adverse events were judged to be related to PES.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with stroke and subsequent tracheotomy, PES increased the proportion of patients who were ready for decannulation in this study population, many of whom received PES within a month of their stroke. Future trials should confirm whether PES is beneficial in tracheotomised patients who receive stimulation similarly early after stroke and explore its effects in other cohorts.

FUNDING

Phagenesis Ltd.

Decannulation and Functional Outcome After Tracheostomy in Patients with Severe Stroke (DECAST): A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Tracheostomy is performed in ventilated stroke patients affected by persisting severe dysphagia, reduced level of consciousness, or prolonged mechanical ventilation. The study aim was to determine the frequency and predictors of successful decannulation and long-term functional outcome in tracheotomized stroke patients.

METHODS

A prospective single-center observational study recruited ventilated patients with ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Follow-up visits were performed at hospital discharge, 3, and 12 months. Competing risk analyses were performed to identify predictors of decannulation.

RESULTS

We included 53 ventilated stroke patients who had tracheostomy. One year after tracheostomy, 19 patients were decannulated (median [IQR] time to decannulation 74 [58-117] days), 13 patients were permanently cannulated, and 21 patients died without prior removal of the cannula. Independent predictors for decannulation in our cohort were patient age (HR 0.95 [95% CI: 0.92-0.99] per one year increase, p = 0.003) and absence of sepsis (HR 4.44 [95% CI: 1.33-14.80], p = 0.008). Compared to surviving patients without cannula removal, decannulated patients had an improved functional outcome after one year (median modified Rankin Scale score 4 vs. 5 [p < 0.001]; median Barthel index 35 vs. 5 [p < 0.001]).

CONCLUSIONS

Decannulation was achieved in 59.4% of stroke patients surviving the first 12 months after tracheostomy and was associated with better functional outcome compared to patients without decannulation. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our results.

Effects of Capping of the Tracheostomy Tube in Stroke Patients With Dysphagia

Objective

To investigate the impact of tracheostomy tube capping on swallowing physiology in stroke patients with dysphagia via videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS).

Methods

This study was conducted as a prospective study that involved 30 stroke patients. Then, 4 mL semisolid swallowing was conducted with capping of the tracheostomy tube or without capping of the tracheostomy tube. The following five parameters were measured: laryngeal elevation, pharyngeal transit time, post-swallow pharyngeal remnant, upper esophageal sphincter width (UES), and penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) score.

Results

On assessment of the differences in swallowing parameters during swallowing between ‘with capping’ and ‘without capping’ statuses, statistically significant differences were found in the post-swallow pharyngeal remnant (without capping, 48.19%±28.70%; with capping, 25.09%±19.23%; p<0.001), normalized residue ratio scale for the valleculae (without capping, 0.17±0.12; with capping, 0.09±0.12; p=0.013), normalized residue ratio scale for the piriform sinus (without capping, 0.16±0.12; with capping, 0.10±0.07; p=0.015), and UES width (without capping, 3.32±1.61 mm; with capping, 4.61±1.95 mm; p=0.003). However, there were no statistically significant differences in laryngeal elevation (x-axis without capping, 2.48±1.45 mm; with capping, 3.26±2.37 mm; y-axis without capping, 11.11±5.24 mm; with capping, 12.64±6.16 mm), pharyngeal transit time (without capping, 9.19± 10.14 s; with capping, 9.09±10.21 s), and PAS score (without capping, 4.94±2.83; with capping, 4.18±2.24).

Conclusion

Tracheostomy tube capping is a useful way to reduce post-swallow remnants and it can be considered an alternative method for alleviating dysphagia in stroke patients who can tolerate tracheostomy tube capping when post-swallow remnants are observed.

Critical Care Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke

OPINION STATEMENT

Ischemic stroke accounts for approximately 85% of all strokes. Although severe strokes constitute a minority of cases, they are associated with a majority of the subsequent disability and death. Reperfusion therapy with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and/or endovascular thrombectomy is a mainstay of acute stroke management. Intensive care management of stroke is focused on reducing complications of reperfusion, such as hemorrhagic transformation, and minimizing secondary brain injury, including brain edema and progressive stroke. Additionally, severe stroke patients frequently need ventilatory or hemodynamic support provided in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Here, we discuss the current medical and surgical ICU management aspects of acute ischemic stroke and identify areas where ongoing studies may reveal new treatments to improve neurological recovery.

Swallowing Function and Kinematics in Stroke Patients with Tracheostomies

The purpose of this study was to compare the swallowing function and kinematics in stroke patients with and without tracheostomies. In this retrospective matched case-control study, we compared stroke patients with (TRACH group, n = 24) and without (NO-TRACH group, n = 24) tracheostomies. Patients were matched for age, sex, and stroke-type. Swallowing function was evaluated using the videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale (VDS) and functional oral intake scale (FOIS) obtained from videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) images. Swallowing kinematics were evaluated using a two-dimensional kinematic analysis of the VFSS images. Mean duration of tracheostomy was 132.38 ± 150.46 days in the TRACH group. There was no significant difference in the total VDS score between the TRACH (35.17 ± 15.30) and NO-TRACH groups (29.25 ± 16.66, p = 0.247). FOIS was significantly lower in the TRACH group (2.33 ± 1.40) than in the NO-TRACH group (4.33 ± 1.79, p = 0.001). The TRACH group had a significantly lower maximum vertical displacement (15.23 ± 7.39 mm, p = 0.011) and velocity (54.99 ± 29.59 mm/s, p = 0.011), and two-dimensional velocity (61.07 ± 24.89 mm/s, p = 0.013) of the larynx than the NO-TRACH group (20.18 ± 5.70 mm, 82.23 ± 37.30 mm/s, and 84.40 ± 36.05 mm/s, respectively). Maximum horizontal velocity of the hyoid bone in the TRACH group (36.77 ± 16.97 mm/s) was also significantly lower than that in the NO-TRACH group (47.49 ± 15.73 mm/s, p = 0.032). This study demonstrated that stroke patients with tracheostomies had inferior swallowing function and kinematics than those without tracheostomies. A prospective longitudinal study is needed to elucidate the effect of a tracheostomy on swallowing recovery in stroke patients.

How should this patient with repeated aspiration pneumonia be managed and treated?-a proposal of the Percutaneous ENdoscopIc Gastrostomy and Tracheostomy (PENlIGhT) procedure

Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) is commonly seen among the elderly with a substantial proportion of patients suffering from long-term dysphagia and/or an inability to protect their airway. This potentially imposes on them an increased risk of malnutrition and aspiration pneumonia. In this article, we present a patient with malnutrition and dysphagia secondary to CVA. We propose a procedure for which we will name the Percutaneous ENdoscopIc Gastrostomy and Tracheostomy (PENlIGhT) procedure for placement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and tracheostomy tube (TT) at the same time. The medical literature was systematically reviewed for both PEG and tracheostomy, aiming to provide the state-of-the-art evidence for clinical use of the PENlIGhT procedure. In clinical practice, the PENlIGhT procedure is indicated for patients who are expected to have prolonged swallowing disturbance and mechanical ventilation. Some prediction tools and scores can be helpful to identify such groups of patients. Patients with poor neurological outcomes who require prolonged maintenance of life are also good candidates for the PENlIGhT procedure.

Management of Hemispheric Infarction and Ischemic Swelling

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides an overview of large territory hemispheric infarction, with an emphasis on recent developments and practical issues related to its evaluation, diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment. Swelling after large infarction results in severe morbidity and often death. Early vigilance for the development of swelling is critical to optimize patient outcome. Comprehensive management is highly dependent on a strong multidisciplinary, collaborative approach.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several advances in the last decade have led to an increasingly standardized approach to the patient with significant brain swelling after stroke. In particular, early identification of patients with large stroke at high risk for deterioration, and decompressive craniectomy as an important treatment option, are two significant advances.

SUMMARY

Effective management of hemispheric ischemic stroke and swelling requires a team skilled in the neurologic examination of critically ill patients and a broad understanding of the natural history of brain swelling after stroke.

Early tracheostomy in ventilated stroke patients: Study protocol of the international multicentre randomized trial SETPOINT2 (Stroke-related Early Tracheostomy vs. Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical care Trial 2)

BACKGROUND

Tracheostomy is a common procedure in long-term ventilated critical care patients and frequently necessary in those with severe stroke. The optimal timing for tracheostomy is still unknown, and it is controversial whether early tracheostomy impacts upon functional outcome.

METHOD

The Stroke-related Early Tracheostomy vs. Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical care Trial 2 (SETPOINT2) is a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-blinded endpoint (PROBE-design) trial. Patients with acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage who are so severely affected that two weeks of ventilation are presumed necessary based on a prediction score are eligible. It is intended to enroll 190 patients per group (n = 380). Patients are randomized to either percutaneous tracheostomy within the first five days after intubation or to ongoing orotracheal intubation with consecutive weaning and extubation and, if the latter failed, to percutaneous tracheostomy from day 10 after intubation. The primary endpoint is functional outcome defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS, 0-4 (favorable) vs. 5 + 6 (unfavorable)) after six months; secondary endpoints are mortality and cause of mortality during intensive care unit-stay and within six months from admission, intensive care unit-length of stay, duration of sedation, duration of ventilation and weaning, timing and reasons for withdrawal of life support measures, relevant intracranial pressure rises before and after tracheostomy.

CONCLUSION

The necessity and optimal timing of tracheostomy in ventilated stroke patients need to be identified. SETPOINT2 should clarify whether benefits in functional outcome can be achieved by early tracheostomy in these patients.