Factors favoring stent-graft collapse after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Computed tomography angiography-guided analysis of morphologic properties of the thoracic aorta and arch branches among the adult population: A cross-sectional study

Background and Aims

Before performing any surgical or endovascular procedure, the anatomical classification of the patient is essential for treatment planning. Computed Tomographic Angiography (CTA) is a standard method to evaluate thoracic aortic anatomy and associated variations.

Methods

This cross-sectional, descriptive study was performed among adult participants without any peripheral vascular diseases undergoing thoracic CTA. Demographic data were collected along with factors retrieved from the patients CTA, such as the type of aortic arch, length, and diameter of ascending and descending aorta, the diameter of the main branches and the distance between branches, the angles by which the main arteries rise from their origins, and left anterior oblique angle of the aortic arch.

Results

164 patients, with a mean age of 57 ± 19.3 years, entered the study. 53 (33.8%) had a bovine arch, which was mostly observed among males. A decrease in the frequency of type I arch and also an increase in the frequency of type 2 and 3 arches was observed with the increase in age (p < 0.001). The BCT diameter had a direct association with both left common carotid artery diameter (r = 0.478, p < 0.001) and left subclavian artery diameter (r = 0.470, p < 0.001). The length of the descending aorta had a direct correlation (r = 0.294, p < 0.001) with the length of the ascending aorta.

Conclusion

Complex endovascular interventions are vital method in treating aorta, head, and neck pathologies. Accurate knowledge of thoracic aortic anatomy is becoming crucial for diagnosis and intervention planning.

Collapse of zone 0 landing TEVAR (Najuta) and the development of higher brain dysfunction

Although thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR)-specific complications often develop, stent-graft collapse is a rare, but fatal complication that requires attention. A 62-year-old male underwent TEVAR for a saccular distal arch aortic aneurysm. After the placement of the Gore TAG (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Newark, DE, USA) from zones 2 to 4, a Najuta endograft (Kawasumi Laboratories, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was deployed from zone 0. Neither intraoperative angiography nor postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed endoleaks or migration. On day 12 after surgery, the patient suddenly lost consciousness during rehabilitation, and CT revealed the collapse of the Najuta endograft. In emergency surgery, the Najuta endograft was removed and the TAG was sutured to the aorta. Although the patient survived, he developed irreversible higher brain dysfunction. The cause of the collapse was examined by the manufacturer and only a slight bird-beak configuration was noted. There were no other findings to indicate the cause of the collapse. The Najuta endograft is a semi-customized system that is created according to the three-dimensional morphology of each individual aortic arch and, thus, is expected to follow the flexion of this vessel. Nevertheless, the risk of collapse needs to be considered.

Long-term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair for Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury: A 10 Year Multi-center Experience

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes in patients treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2019, this retrospective observational study was conducted at 3 centers, involving 62 consecutive BTAI patients who underwent TEVAR. Computed tomography angiography scans were planned to be conducted at 6 months post-procedure, and annually thereafter.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in all 62 procedures (100%), which included cases of dissection (n=35, 56.45%), pseudoaneurysm (n=20, 32.26%), and rupture (n=7, 11.29%). Mean injury severity score was 31.66±8.30. A total of 21 supra-arch branches were revascularized by chimney technique, with 12 cases involving the left subclavian artery (LSA) and 9 cases involving the left common carotid artery. In addition, 11 LSAs were covered during the procedure. The in-hospital mortality rate was 1.61% (n=1). The mean follow-up time was 86.82±30.58 months. The all-cause follow-up mortality rate was 3.28% (n=2). Stenosis or occlusion of 3 supra-arch branches (4.92%) was identified at follow-up, with 2 cases (3.28%) requiring re-intervention. No spinal cord ischemia, endoleak, or migration was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite only including patients with long-term follow-up, this study confirms the long-term safety and effectiveness of TEVAR for BTAI. For young BTAI patients, as the thoracic aorta increases with age, longer follow-up is needed to observe the potential mismatch between the endograft and the aorta.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This study confirms the long-term safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatment for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI). For young BTAI patients, as the thoracic aorta increases with age, longer follow-up is needed to observe the potential mismatch between the endograft and the aorta. Through a remarkably extended follow-up period (86.82±30.58 months) conducted at multiple centers in China, this study confirms the long-term safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatment for BTAI.

A rare case of lethal Najuta endograft collapse

BACKGROUND

The development of fenestrated endograft, Najuta endograft Kawasumi Laboratories, Inc, Tokyo, Japan) in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has enabled the treatment of aortic arch aneurysms approaching zone 0 without the need of supra-aortic vessel branch reconstruction. However, the indications of Najuta remain controversial due to complications such as endograft collapse, which is rare and lethal.

CASE PRESENTATION

We here report a 75-year-old male patient with arch saccular aneurysm. Because of his liver cirrhosis, 2 debranching TEVAR has chosen as a treatment using Najuta. After extrathoracic bypass was performed, a CTAG stent graft was implanted distal to the LSCA in order to deliver Najuta stent graft steadily. Najuta stent graft was successfully positioned in zone 0. However, he was suffered from stent-graft collapse. After additional TEVAR to salvage stent-graft collapse to zone 0, he complicated type A dissection, which was treated by ascending aorta replacement. After salvage operation complicated multiorgan failure and he died.

Stent Graft Collapse after Zone 0 Landing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

A zone 0 landing thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed on a 69-year-old man with a saccular aortic arch aneurysm. Seven days after the surgery, the patient experienced diminished consciousness and lower limb paralysis. Stent graft collapse was seen on a computed tomography scan. Thereafter, the patient underwent total arch replacement and emergency stent graft removal.

In vitro evaluation of the optimal degree of oversizing of thoracic endografts in prosthetic landing areas: a pilot study

Objective

The optimal degree of proximal thoracic endograft oversizing when aiming for durable sealing in prosthetic grafts is unknown. The aim of the present study was to create an in vitro model for testing different oversized thoracic endografts in a reproducible and standardized manner and, subsequently, determine the optimal oversizing range when planning procedures with a proximal landing in prosthetic zones in the descending thoracic aorta or aortic arch.

Methods

An in vitro model consisting of a fixed 24-mm polyethylene terephthalate (Dacron; DuPont) graft sutured proximally and distally to two specifically designed 40-mm rings, with four force sensing resistors attached at four equally distant positions and a USB camera attached proximally for photographic and video documentation was used for deployment of Zenith TX2 (Cook Medical Inc) dissection platform endografts with diameters between 24 and 36 mm. After deployment, ballooning with a 32-mm compliant balloon was performed to simulate real-life conditions. The assessment of oversizing included visual inspection, calculation of the valley areas created between the prosthetic wall and the stent graft fabric, distance between the stent graft peaks, the radial force exerted by the proximal sealing stent, and the pull-out force necessary for endograft extraction.

Results

A total of 70 endografts were deployed with the oversizing ranging from 0% to 50%: 10 × 24 mm, 10 × 26 mm, 10 × 28 mm, 10 × 30 mm, 10 × 32 mm, 10 × 34 mm, and 10 × 36 mm. Two cases of infolding occurred with 50% oversizing. The valley areas increased from 8.79 ± 0.23 mm² with 16.7% oversizing to 14.26 ± 0.45 mm² with 50% oversizing (P < .001). A significant difference was found in the pull-out force required for endografts with <10% oversizing vs ≥10% oversizing (P < .001). The difference reached a plateau at ∼4 N with oversizing of >15%. The mean radial force of the proximal sealing stent was greater after remodeling with a compliant balloon (0.55 ± 0.02 N vs 0.60 ± 0.02 N after ballooning; P < .001). However, greater oversizing did not lead to an increase in the radial force exerted by the proximal sealing stent.

Conclusions

The findings from the present study offer additional insight into the mechanics of oversized stent grafts in surgical grafts. In endografts with the Zenith stent design (TX2), oversizing of <16.7% resulted in reduced resistance to displacement forces, and oversizing of >50% was associated with major infolding in 20% of cases. Long-term in vitro and in vivo testing is required to understand how these mechanical properties affect the clinical outcomes of oversizing.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term reintervention following thoracic endovascular repair for blunt traumatic aortic injury

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the long-term reinterventions of thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) after blunt traumatic aortic injury.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were interrogated until June 2021. Inclusion criteria were blunt traumatic aortic injury treated with TEVAR and mean follow-up of more than 60 months. A systematic review was conducted and data were pooled using a random effects model of proportions applying the Freeman-Tukey transformation. Late reintervention was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were procedure-related complications (endoleak, in-stent thrombosis, occlusion, infolding/collapse, bird-beak, migration, and left arm claudication), overall and aortic-related mortality, and aortic diameter changes.

RESULTS

Eleven studies with a low quality assessment were included. Four hundred eight patients were collected and the 389 surviving more than 30 days were included. The mean follow-up was 8.2 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7-10.8; I² = 40.2%). Late reintervention was 2.1% (95% CI, 0.6-3.9; I² = 0.0%; 11/389 cases) with 0.1% (95% CI, 0.0-1.2; I² = 0.0%; 3/389) occurring after 5 years. Bird-beak was identified in 38.7% (95% CI, 16.4-63.6; I² = 86.6%). Left arm claudication occurring after 30 days was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.1-8.6; I² = 26.9%; 11/140 cases). In-stent thrombosis was 1.9% (95% CI, 0.1-5.2; I² = 51.8%; 11/389 cases). Endoleak was 0.5% (95% CI, 0.0-1.9; I² = 0.0%; 5/389 cases). Infolding, occlusion, and migration were reported in 2 of 389, 1 of 389, and 0 of 389 patients, respectively. Overall late survival was 95.6% (95% CI, 88.1-99.8; I² = 84.7%; 358/389 patients) and only one patient accounted for aortic related mortality. The increase in proximal and distal aortic diameters was estimated at 2.7 mm (95% CI, 1.2-4.3; I² = 0.0%) and 2.5 mm (95% CI, 1.1-3.9; I² = 0.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR demonstrates remarkably good long-term results and reinterventions are rarely required. Aortic reinterventions tend to occur within the first and after the fifth year.

Safety and arch complications after hemiarch versus total arch replacement with stented elephant trunk in acute type 1 dissection: Is a stent graft always beneficial?

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the efficacy of total arch replacement with stented elephant trunk by comparing it with hemiarch replacement with and without open stent graft for acute aortic dissection type 1.

METHODS

We reviewed records of 177 patients who underwent hemiarch replacement (HAR group) (concomitant open stent, 125) and 98 patients who underwent total arch replacement (TAR group) (concomitant stented elephant trunk, 91) for acute type 1 dissection. Compared with the TAR group, the HAR group was older (68.1 vs 60.9 years; P < .01) and had more thrombosed false lumen (28.8% vs 4.1%, P < .01).

RESULTS

In-hospital death occurred for 7 patients in the HAR group and 1 patient in the TAR group (P = .17). More patients in the TAR group had a postoperative thrombosed false lumen, compared with the HAR group (68% vs 54%, P = .03). In patients with preoperative nonthrombosed false lumen in the HAR group, the rate of postoperative thrombosis was significantly lower than with versus without an open stent (31% vs 65%, P = .01). The rate of freedom from an aortic arch event in the TAR group at 5 years was significantly greater than that in the HAR group (100% vs 83.7%, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Stented elephant trunk with TAR provided a high rate of false lumen thrombosis and a low incidence of arch events, whereas an open stent during HAR was not beneficial in terms of false lumen thrombosis and arch event prevention.

Collapse of Najuta endograft (aortic arch graft) in patient with intermittent paraparesis

A 50-year-old male underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for distal arch traumatic aortic dissection. Following placement of a Najuta endograft (Kawasumi Laboratories, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) from zone 0 to zone 4, patency of the three vessels was confirmed. Later, the patient suddenly experienced complete intermittent loss of motor and sensory functions in the bilateral lower extremities. Contrast computed tomography (CT) findings indicated endograft stenosis. Following an additional TEVAR procedure, the paraparesis state was temporarily improved. Thereafter, he was readmitted due to congestive heart failure with intermittent paraparesis and contrast CT findings indicated endograft collapse. An emergency procedure for re-expansion of the collapsed endograft and urgent surgery for replacement of the aortic arch was successful. In cases with intermittent paraparesis, endograft collapse should be considered.

[Update on thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair : New stent graft designs]

BACKGROUND

In the last decade, new stent graft designs have evolved to tackle challenges in thoracic endovascular aortic repair. A specific focus on access vessel issues has led to the introduction of new low-profile endograft designs for most of the major products.

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this article is to provide an overview of the available publications on new stent graft designs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Assessing recent publications on the major reiterations of thoracic endografts, benefits and drawbacks are discussed.

RESULTS

Recent reiterations of major endografts for thoracic aortic endovascular repair have focused mainly on the development of low-profile devices. Through alterations on graft fabric as well as stent material and design, delivery systems were reduced in profile, thus, reducing access vessel complications or enabling an endovascular procedure altogether. Long-term data are already available for one endoprosthesis. Other refinements include in situ adaptation of the stent graft to the aortic arch curvature as well as the option of staged deployment to allow more precision and reduce manipulation close to supra-aortic branches.

CONCLUSIONS

Especially in the case of low-profile endografts, preliminary and long-term results of access vessel complications are promising. In order to draw final conclusions as to how durable the results of aneurysm exclusion are, more long-term studies are warranted.

Open repair versus thoracic endovascular aortic repair for treating traumatic aortic injury

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) is rare and fatal. Treatment has evolved with advances in imaging and the emergence of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This study reports a single-center, 5-year experience of TEVAR and open repair for BTAI.

METHODS

Patients with BTAI treated at a level I trauma center from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed with patient charts and successive computed tomography angiography images. Patients were grouped according to treatment modality: open repair, TEVAR, or medical management, chosen based on patients' characteristics and injury severity. Groups were compared in terms of preoperative demographics, injury characteristics, operative variables, short-term, and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were included in the study: 16 (38%) underwent open repair, 17 (40.4%) underwent TEVAR, seven (16.6%) were managed medically, and two (4.7%) died during triage. The median age was 49 years (interquartile range [IQR], 38-57.5 years), and 92.5% were male; the median Injury Severity Score was 33 (IQR, 29-41). Overall mortality was 7.5%. The median hospital stay was 33 days (IQR, 19.5-58.5). Patients undergoing open repair were significantly younger (43 vs. 55 years; p = 0.002) and had a smaller aortic diameter (22.3 vs. 24.0 mm; p=<0.001) than those undergoing TEVAR. No BTAI-related late mortality or reintervention was observed during follow-ups.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated excellent outcomes with multidisciplinary team efforts and appropriate application of treatment modality. TEVAR is ideal for older or severely injured patients; open repair is an important alternative for young patients or patients with unsuitable aortic anatomy.

Comparative evaluation of ballet-type and conventional stent graft configurations for endovascular aneurysm repair: A CFD analysis

PURPOSE:

Cross limb stent graft (SG) configuration technique for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is employed for splayed aortic bifurcations to avoid device kinking and smoothen cannulation. The present study investigates three types of stent graft (SG) configurations for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in abdominal aortic aneurysm. A computational fluid dynamic analysis was performed on the pulsatile non-Newtonian flow characteristics in three ideally modeled geometries of abdominal aortic (AA) SG configurations.

METHODS:

The three planar and crosslimb SG configurations were ideally modeled, namely, top-down nonballet-type, top-down ballet-type, and bottom-up nonballet-type configurations. In top-down SG configuration, most of the device is deployed in the main body in the vicinity of renal artery and the limbs are extended to the iliac artery. While in the bottom-up configuration, some of the SG device is deployed in the main body, the limbs are deployed in aortic bifurcation, and the extra stent graft of the main body is extended to the proximal aorta until the below of the renal artery. The effects of non-Newtonian pulsatile flow on the wall stresses and flow patterns of the three models were investigated and compared. Moreover, the average wall shear stress (AWSS), oscillatory shear stress index (OSI), absolute helicity, pressure distribution, graft displacement and flow visualization plots were analyzed.

RESULTS:

The top-down ballet-type showed less branch blockage effect than the top-down nonballet-type models. Furthermore, the top-down ballet-type configuration showed an increased tendency to sustain high WSS and higher helicity characteristics than that of the bottom-up and top-down non-ballet type configurations. However, displacement forces of the top-down ballet-type configuration were 40% and 9.6% higher than those of the bottom-up and top-down nonballet-type configurations, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Some complications such as graft tearing, thrombus formation, limb disconnection during long term follow up periods might be relevant to hemodynamic characteristics according to the configurations of EVAR. Hence, the reported data required to be validated with the clinical results.

Endovascular aortic arch repair with a pre-cannulated double-fenestrated physician-modified stent graft: a benchtop experiment

OBJECTIVES

The critical step in total endovascular aortic arch repair is to ensure alignment of fenestrations with, and thus maintenance of flow to, supra-aortic trunks. This experimental study evaluates the feasibility and accuracy of a double-fenestrated physician-modified endovascular graft [single common large fenestration for the brachiocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery and a distal small fenestration for left subclavian artery (LSA) with a preloaded guidewire for the LSA] for total endovascular aortic arch repair.

METHODS

Eight fresh human cadaveric thoracic aortas were harvested. Thoracic endografts with a physician-modified double fenestration were deployed for total endovascular aortic arch repair in a bench test model. A guidewire was preloaded through the distal fenestration for the LSA. All experiments were undertaken in a hybrid room under fluoroscopic guidance with subsequent angioscopy and open evaluation for assessment.

RESULTS

Mean aortic diameter in zone 0 was 31.3 ± 3.33 mm. Mean duration for stent graft modification was 20.1 ± 5.8 min. Mean duration of the procedure was 24 ± 8.6 min. The Medtronic Valiant Captivia stent graft was used in 6 and the Cook Alpha Zenith thoracic stent graft in 2 cases. LSA catheterization was technically successful with supra-aortic trunk patency in 100% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a double-fenestrated stent graft with a preloaded guidewire appears to be a useful technical addition to facilitate easy and correct alignment of stent graft fenestrations with supra-aortic trunk origins.

Long-term outcomes of the conformable TAG thoracic endoprosthesis in a prospective multicenter trial

BACKGROUND

The Gore conformable TAG thoracic endoprosthesis (CTAG) was engineered to enhance conformability in the thoracic aorta and has demonstrated greater deployment accuracy and wall apposition than the original TAG device. The Food and Drug Administration approved the CTAG in 2011 based on the 1-year results of the pivotal trial for the CTAG device. In the present report, we have documented the outcomes for those patients through 5 years.

METHODS

The CTAG aneurysm study was a prospective, multicenter trial that assessed the safety and effectiveness of the CTAG device as treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Follow-up imaging assessments consisted of radiographs and computed tomography at annual intervals through 5 years. A core imaging laboratory was used to assess the aneurysm size, device integrity, and endoleaks.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients were enrolled (51 pivotal arm patients and 15 continued access patients) from October 2009 through September 2011. The baseline characteristics, procedural characteristics, and outcomes through 2 years were reported previously. Through 5 years, five patients (7.6%) had required device-related reintervention (one type Ia endoleak or contained rupture of the descending thoracic aorta, one type Ib endoleak, two indeterminate endoleaks, and one thoracic aortic pseudoaneurysm). Four patients (6.1%) had died of aneurysm-related causes, with one death occurring within 30 days of the index procedure. A total of 24 patients (36.3%) had died during the 5-year study period. Seven patients (10.6%) had experienced stroke or transient ischemic attack through 5 years, with one early stroke (postoperative day 28). Prosthesis or intercomponent migration was observed in six patients (9.1%) through 5 years; however, no patient had developed a type III junctional endoleak. No stent-graft fracture or compression was observed through 5 years. At 5 years, 14 patients (50.0%) showed sac regression, 5 (17.9%) showed sac expansion, and 9 (32.1%) showed sac stability using on a 5-mm threshold for change.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the CTAG device was associated with low rates of aneurysm-related mortality and reintervention through 5 years. Proximal endoleak was rare, and most patients showed sac regression or stability at 5 years after the initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Important issues regarding planning and sizing for emergent TEVAR

In the past decades, treatment of acute thoracic aortic syndrome underwent drastic changes with a central role for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). One of the essential factors in the success of TEVAR is accurate sizing of the endograft, as both under- and oversizing can lead to suboptimal results and disastrous complications. The aim of this review was to give an overview of issues regarding endograft sizing in emergent TEVAR. Sizing of the endograft can be complicated by specific factors related to the underlying disease. For instance, different types of the acute thoracic aortic syndrome, i.e. blunt thoracic injury, thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection with concomitant rupture are associated with hemorrhagic shock and the need for resuscitation, which leads to profound changes in diameter of the thoracic aorta. These diameter changes should be taken into account during endograft sizing. Measuring the thoracic aorta based on the admission CTA can lead to inaccurate sizing, even if proper centerline-based measurements are performed. The use of real-time imaging, in particular intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), has been shown to provide more accurate endograft sizing in acute thoracic aortic syndromes, especially if associated with hypovolemia. Future research should provide additional data on the exact role of different intra-operative imaging modalities (e.g. IVUS, transesophageal echocardiography [TEE], three dimensional CTA) on endograft sizing and long-term outcomes to ultimately improve patient outcome.

Open Conversion for Recurrent Endograft Occlusion after Endovascular Treatment of Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury: A Peculiar Case Report

BACKGROUND

We report a rare case of delayed, symptomatic thoracic endograft thrombosis after the initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for blunt thoracic aortic injury which was successfully retreated with a redo TEVAR, followed by open conversion due to recurrent partial occlusion of the distal edge of the endografts.

METHODS

Two years ago, a 22-year-old man had undergone an emergency TEVAR for blunt thoracic aortic injury. A Zenith Cook 22 × 100 mm (Cook Incorporated, Bloomington, IN) endograft was used. Six months later, he underwent an emergency endovascular relining of the endograft using the same type of device. The multiorgan perfusion was completely restored except for the spinal cord injury. After 8 months, a recurrent partial occlusion of the distal edge of the second graft was documented. The thoracic aorta was replaced with a 22-mm silver-coated graft (Maquet Spain, SLU).

RESULTS

Histology examination showed a neointimal formation and thickening and fibrosis of the inner 1/3 of the media with loss of smooth muscle cells and increase of the elastic fibers.

CONCLUSIONS

The need for secondary interventions or open conversion because of potential complications after TEVAR for traumatic aortic injury is an additional consideration when weighing the risks and benefits of endovascular repair and subsequent surveillance strategies.

One-Year Results From the SURPASS Observational Registry of the CTAG Stent-Graft With the Active Control System

Purpose: To report the outcomes from the observational SURPASS registry, which was created to assess the performance of the Conformable TAG (CTAG) stent-graft with the Active Control System (ACS) in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in a real-world setting. Materials and Methods: The SURPASS registry (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT03286400) was an observational, prospective, single-arm, post-market, international study that enrolled patients undergoing TEVAR using the CTAG with ACS for both acute and chronic thoracic aortic disease between October 2017 and July 2018. The CTAG with ACS features 2-stage deployment of the stent-graft and an optional angulation mechanism that modifies only the proximal end of the stent-graft. During the observation period, 127 patients (mean age 67.1±12.1 years, range 27–86; 92 men) were enrolled and treated for an array of aortic pathologies, including chronic and acute lesions and 4 ruptured descending thoracic aneurysms. The primary outcome of this study was technical success; secondary outcomes were clinical success and major adverse events at 30 days and 12 months. The numbers of 2-stage device deployments and applications of the angulation mechanism were recorded, along with the reasons for use. Results: Technical success of the TEVAR was 97.6% owing to unintentional partial coverage of supra-aortic branches in 3 cases (the vessels were patent on imaging). The stent-graft was repositioned at its intermediate diameter in 79 patients (62.2%), and the angulation feature was applied in 64 cases (50.4%), mainly to improve proximal wall apposition and orthogonality in the aorta. The desired effect was achieved in 60 cases (93.8%). There was no device compression, bird-beak configuration, fracture, or graft occlusion. The 30-day and 12-month clinical success rates were 97.6% and 92.9%, respectively. There were 3 aorta-related deaths at 30 days and a further 3 at 12 months. Fatalities were due to a retrograde type A dissection (0.8%), paraplegia, bowel ischemia, sepsis in the setting of a mycotic aneurysm, aneurysm rupture post aortoesophageal fistula, and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. Three endoleaks (2 type Ia and 1 type III) required reintervention. Conclusion: In the SURPASS registry, the use of the CTAG device with ACS showed promising outcomes despite the challenging pathologies. The new delivery system enables a controlled staged delivery with in situ adjustments during positioning, facilitating the treatment of complex aortic disease.

Delayed Aortic Stent Collapse in Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury Repair

Background  Endovascular stent grafting has emerged as an option to treat traumatic aorta injuries with reported significantly low mortality and morbidity. Stent collapse is one of the complications that can occur in this type of treatment. The aim of this article is to analyze the expected cause of stent collapse and to draw attention to the importance of the surveillance follow-up, as this phenomenon may occur late postdeployment.

Methods  A retrospectively collected dataset from the two highest volume trauma centers in Saudi Arabia was analyzed between April 2007 and October 2012. A total of 66 patients received stent grafts for traumatic aortic injury and were included in the study. We apply Ishimaru's anatomical aortic arch zones and Benjamin's aortic injury grading systems. There were 35 patients with aortic injury at zone 2, 26 patients in zone 3, and 5 patients in zone 4. About 96% (63) of the injuries were grades 2 and 3, including large intimal flap or aortic wall pseudoaneurysm with change in wall contour. The technical success rate, as defined by complete exclusion of lesions without leaks, stroke, arm ischemia or stent-related complications, was 90%.

Results  Proximal stent collapse occurred in 4.5% of patients (3 of 66 inserted stents) during follow-up of 4 to 8 years (mean, 6 years). Patients with stent collapse tended to have an acute aortic arch angle with long-intraluminal stent lip, when compared with patients with noncollapsed stents. Intraluminal lip protrusion more than 10-mm increased collapse ( p  < 0.001). Stent-grafts sizes larger than 28 mm also demonstrated a higher collapse rate ( p  < 0.001).

Conclusions  The risk of stent collapse appears related to poor apposition of the stent due to severe aortic arch angulation in young patients and to large stent sizes (>28 mm). Such age groups may have more anatomical and aortic size changes during the growth. Clinical and radiological surveillance is essential in follow-up after stent-graft treatment for traumatic aortic injury.

Risk factors of distal segment aortic enlargement after complicated type B aortic dissection

Objectives

Distal segment aortic enlargement (DSAE) is a common complication that influences the long-term prognosis of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). In this study, a multivariate analysis was performed to find potential factors predictive of DSAE.

Methods

A single-center retrospective study was performed from 1999 to 2016. Included in the study were complicated TBAD patients who underwent TEVAR with uncovered residual tears. Based on the diameter of the distal segment of the uncovered aorta, we assigned patients to an enlargement group and a non-enlargement group. Data extracted from the medical records included demographic and clinical characteristics and follow-up computed tomography angiography data. The primary endpoints were the all-cause mortality and the presumably aortic-related events that required reintervention during the follow-up period.

Results

For the 333 patients, all-cause mortality was 38 (11.41%), and 76 (22.82%) patients underwent reintervention. A total of 70 (21.02%) patients experienced DSAE, among them were 2 patients who died of aortic rupture and 58 patients who accepted reintervention. Multivariate analysis reviewed independent risk factors of postoperative DSAE, including current smoking, the residual length of the patent false lumen, the postoperative number of dissection tears in the thoracic aorta and type III aortic arch; as well as protective factors, including the application of a restrictive bare stent (RBS), the length of covered stent in the descending thoracic aorta, and the distance from the residual first tear to the left subclavian artery (LSA).

Conclusion

DSAE after TEVAR for patients with a complicated TBAD can be influenced by their current smoking habit, the residual length of patent false lumen, the postoperative number of dissection tears in the thoracic aorta and the aortic arch type. Meanwhile, RBS usage, the length of the covered stent in the descending thoracic aorta and the distance from the residual first tear to the LSA could have positive effect on the prognosis.

Impact of the Bird-Beak Configuration on Postoperative Outcome After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Meta-analysis

Purpose: To investigate the association between the bird-beak configuration (BBC), a wedge-shaped gap between the undersurface of a thoracic endograft and the lesser curvature of the arch after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), and postoperative outcome after TEVAR. Methods: The study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify all case series reporting BBC after TEVAR between 2006 and April 2018. Data analysis was performed considering the difference in the risk of complications for presence vs absence of BBC. After screening 1633 articles, 21 studies were identified that matched the selection criteria; 12 of these reported detailed information to investigate the postoperative outcome using proportion meta-analysis with a random effects model. The pooled risk difference is reported with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity of the included studies was assessed with the I2 statistic (low 25%, medium 50%, high 75%). Results: Complications occurred within a range of 0 to 72 months in 14.7% (95% CI 7.4% to 27.3%) of patients with BBC and in 6.3% (95% CI 2.5% to 15.4%) of patients without BBC. A cumulative incidence could not be assessed. The summary risk difference was 11.1% (95% CI −0.1% to 22.3%, p=0.052). There was significant heterogeneity ( I2=85.6%). The Egger test did not show evidence of publication bias (p=0.975). When specifically considering type Ia endoleak and endograft migration, the risk difference between BBC and non-BBC patients was 8.2% (95% CI 0.3% to 16.1%, p=0.042; I2=69.0%). The specific risk difference for endograft collapse/infolding and thrombosis was 3.7% (95% CI −3.5% to 11.1%, p=0.308; I2=10.2%). Conclusion: At present the literature does not provide statistical evidence to establish an overall prognostic value of the BBC. Nevertheless, the BBC appears to be associated with a high risk of type Ia endoleak and endograft migration, which warrants specific and long-term surveillance. Clinically relevant values for BBC grading should be established to perhaps define indications for preemptive treatment based on the presence of BBC only.

Blunt traumatic injury to the thoracic aorta treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a single-centre 20-year experience

OBJECTIVES

Blunt thoracic aortic injury can be treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with excellent short and mid-term outcomes. However, few data are available about the long-term results. Our goal was to report our single-centre, 20-year experience using TEVAR to treat blunt thoracic aortic injury.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database to identify all patients treated with TEVAR for traumatic lesions of the aortic isthmus. We identified 35 patients since 1998. Patients' charts were analysed for preoperative characteristics, intraoperative variables and short-term outcomes. Information about the long-term follow-up was collected by analysing cross-sectional images and via phone calls. Follow-up was 100% complete. Rates of survival and of freedom from aortic redo were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were men (82%). The median age was 42 years (range 22-79 years) and the mean injury severity score was 38 (±13). The endovascular procedure was successfully carried out in all patients. The left subclavian artery was intentionally overstented in 11 patients (31%). Two patients died perioperatively (5.7%). The estimated survival was 92% and 87% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, with no aorta-related deaths. The estimated freedom from aortic redo was 96% and 91% at 5 and 10 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data corroborate the excellent results of the endovascular treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injury when follow-up is extended to 20 years. New-generation devices, which are more comfortable and have smaller diameters, may further improve the results of TEVAR in treating traumatic aortic injury. Surveillance with cross-sectional imaging remains mandatory.

Endovascular treatment of complex diseases of the thoracic aorta-10 years single centre experience

BACKGROUND

Introduction of invasive endovascular techniques constituted a real a breakthrough in the treatment of aortic aneurysm dissection and rupture. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with thoracic aortic pathologies.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2017, 118 patients with thoracic aortic pathology underwent TEVAR. Among them, 20 (16.9%) patients required hybrid procedures. Stent grafts indication were thoracic aortic aneurysm in 46 (39.0%) patients, type B dissection in 68 (57.6%) patients and other indications in 4 (3.3%). Procedural success rate, in-hospital and late mortality and morbidity were evaluated.

RESULTS

The patients were followed-up for a mean of 55 months (range, 6-118 months). The technical success rate was 96%. Five patients died during the first 30 days after procedure (mortality 4.2%), four due to ischemic stroke followed by multi-organ failure and another one hemodynamically significant type I endoleak. Most of them were noted in the first years of our study. Five others died during post-discharged period. Four patients developed neurological complications, including stroke (n=2; 1.7%) and paraparesis (n=2; 1.7%). There were 6 (5.1%) primary (5 type I and 1 type II) and 3 (2.5%) secondary endoleaks (1 type I and 2 type III). Secondary interventions were required in 8 subjects. There was one case of stent collapse and two retrograde aortic dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of descending aortic diseases by using stent graft implantation has become the method of choice, decreasing the risk of open surgery, especially in patients with severe clinical state and comorbidities. However, effectiveness and safety may be achieved by experience team.

The most relevant unmet needs in endovascular management of descending thoracic aorta

Endovascular repair of descending thoracic aorta (DTA) is considered as first interventional option for most part of the aortic disorders. However, many unmet needs and issues are still limiting its applicability. One of the major limitations is related to the existing gaps in evidence. Clear and robust evidence is still needed in many aspects of the management of DTA pathologies. In numerous clinical scenarios, adequate trials are lacking. Besides those gaps in evidence, it is well recognized that thoracic endografting (TEVAR) is technically evolving in order to overcome technical and device-related complications and limitations. We can deploy endografts in any aortic segment: in the descending, in the ascending, in the arch, even preserving aortic branches. Nevertheless, from the pure technical point of view, current generations of endografts still need more development and improvement. Durability remains the major concern for any endovascular treatment, and thoracic endografting is not an exception. As Galenus said, the physician is only nature's assistant, thoracic endograft should also follow the natural anatomy instead of fighting against it. We will focus the following pages on the graft conformability and compliance, both related to durability and safety of thoracic endografting. We will review the current knowledge and concerns associated with the anatomical and hemodynamic modifications induced by the thoracic endograft strength, stiffness and straightness and their implications for the future thoracic endograft designs.

Complications and Perioperative Management of Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Endovascular treatments have become increasingly common for patients with a variety of thoracic aortic pathologies. Although considered less invasive than traditional open surgical approaches, they are nonetheless complex procedures. Patients undergo manipulation of an often calcified aorta near the origin of the carotid and subclavian vessels and have stents placed in a curved vessel adjacent to a perpetually beating heart. These stents can obstruct blood flow to the spinal cord, induce an inflammatory response, and in rare cases erode into the adjacent trachea or esophagus. Renal complications range from contrast-induced nephropathy to hypotension and ischemia to dissection. Emboli can lead to strokes and mesenteric ischemia. These patients have complex medical histories, and skilled perioperative management is critical to achieving the best clinical outcomes. Here, we review the medical management of the most common complications in these patients including stroke, spinal cord ischemia, renal injury, retrograde dissections, aortoesophageal and aortobronchial fistulas, postimplantation syndrome, mesenteric ischemia, and endograft failure.

CT patterns of acute type A aortic arch dissection: longer, higher, more anterior

OBJECTIVES

This study analysed CT patterns of the acute dissected aortic arch using original biometric features along with comparison with normal aortas.

METHODS

The diagnostic CT scans of 57 patients (42 males, age (mean ± SD: 64.5 ± 13.8 years) admitted with acute Stanford type A dissection involving the aortic arch were analysed by semi-automatic detection protocol of the true lumen of the dissection. We measured the distances from the apex to the ascending and descending aorta, the curvilinear length of the entire arch and of its segments (especially between the brachiocephalic artery trunk and the left subclavian artery), as well as the surface area, angle, height and shift of the arch. These measurements were compared with results previously obtained in a healthy cohort in an analysis adjusted for age, sex and weight. The surface area and rotation of the false lumen were also analysed.

RESULTS

Compared to normal aortic arches (N), dissected aortic arches (D) were longer (D: 155 ± 26  mm, N: 135 ± 25  mm, p = 0.002), higher (D: 51 ± 10  mm, N: 45 ± 9  mm, p = 0.04), and with a more anterior apex (shift: D: 1.19 ± 0.56, N: 1.40 ± 0.62, p = 0.007). False lumen occupied between 47-65% of the aorta, turned preferentially clockwise and its rotation decreased progressively along the arch.

CONCLUSIONS

The morphology of the dissected aortic arch differs from that of the normal arch. Thus, our compilation of aortic arch measurements may help improve existing endovascular devices and/or design of new endoprostheses. Advances in knowledge: In this article, we provide a comprehensive set of measurements of the dissected aortic arch, and show that dissected aortic arches are longer, higher, and with a more anterior apex than normal arches.

Anatomical Study of Healthy Aortic Arches

BACKGROUND

With the steady increase of endovascular procedures involving the aortic arch (AA), an actual depiction of its anatomy has become mandatory. It has also become necessary to evaluate the natural evolution of the AA morphology as part of the evaluation of endovascular devices durability. The objective of this study was to perform a morphological and anatomical study of the AA and of the supra aortic trunks (SAT) in healthy patients, with an evaluation of their evolution with time, with a specific orientation applied to endovascular therapies of the AA.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients (31 men, mean age 50.8 [18-82]) with a normal anatomy were included in the study. Measurements included the diameters of the AA and SAT in 17 locations, their distance and angulation based on computed tomography angiography data. Statistical analysis focused on descriptive statistics, differences between genders, as well as correlations with age.

RESULTS

Aortic diameters (mean ± SD) were 29.5 ± 3.9 mm at the ascending aorta, 28.6 ± 3.9 mm at the innominate artery (IA), 27.1 ± 3.2 mm at the left common carotid artery (LCCA), 25.3 ± 3.0 mm at the left subclavian artery (LSCA), 23.9 ± 3.3 mm at the descending aorta. Mean angulation of the AA was 82° (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.95-85.19°), mean angulation between LSCA/LCCA was -5.7° (95% CI: -0.9 to 18.7°) and -1.8° (95% CI: 5.4-26.4°) between LCCA/IA. Mean distance between the LSCA and the LCCA was 14.3 mm (95% CI: 13-15.6 mm) and 21.8 mm (95% CI: 20.3-23.4 mm) between LCCA and IA. All diameters of the AA increased with age (P < 0.05). Men had diameters statistically (P < 0.05) greater than women except at the LCCA ostium level. A statistically significant increase of the distances between the LSCA and the LCCA, between the LSCA and the IA and between the IA and the LCCA was found with age, P = 0.027, <0.01 and 0.012 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study allows obtaining accurate information of the AA and the SAT anatomy. It enabled to obtain a better understanding of the three-dimensional aspects of the AA, confirmed the variability and heterogeneity of the SAT disposition, and discussed the principles of vascular aging.

Measurements After Image Post-processing Are More Precise in the Morphometric Assessment of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms: An Intermodal and Intra-observer Evaluation

OBJECTIVES

Precise pre-procedural anatomical analysis of aneurysmal anatomy is essential for successful thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Since surgeons and radiologists have to perform multiple measurements in the same patient, high intra-observer reliability of any imaging method is mandatory. Commercially available three dimensional (3D) post-processing techniques are expected to be superior to conventional two dimensional multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs) derived from computed tomography angiograms (CTAs). However, few data exist to support this view. This study aims to evaluate the intermodal and intra-observer differences using 3D software (3surgery) in descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (dTAAs).

METHODS

Pre-operative CTAs (performed between 2004 and 2010) of 30 dTAAs (mean maximum diameter 61.4 ± 13 mm) were assessed by three independent investigators with different experience in the measurement of aortic pathologies. Intra-observer reliability and intermodal differences (3D vs. 2D) were investigated using pre-specified measurement points (distances of total length, maximum diameter, proximal and distal landing zones). Statistical analyses were performed using the Bland-Altman method and a mixed regression model.

RESULTS

Intermodal comparison showed that 2D measurements significantly underestimate the measured distances (maximum diameter 3.7 mm [95% CI -5.3 to -2.1] and landing zone maximum 1.4 mm [95% CI -2.0 to -0.2] shorter with 2D, p < .05). In almost all 3D measurements, all investigators showed lower variability comparing the intra-observer differences, most notably in the measuring point total length (reduction of the SD up to 7.9 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that both techniques led to significant measurement disparity. This occurs especially at the point of indication (maximum diameter) and the total length of the aneurysm (important for correct stent graft selection). But overall the variability is reduced with the 3D technique, which also tends to measure greater distances. The use of post-processing software therefore leads to more precise device selection for TEVAR in TAA.

Bridging thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair for a late rupture following aortic coarctation angioplasty

Introduction Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair has been employed to treat late complications after aortic coarctation correction. However, its use in children has seldomly been reported. Case report We present the case of a 15-year-old child who presented with a ruptured aneurysm of the descending aorta complicated later by an aortic-oesophageal fistula following aortic coarctation stenting that was managed with multiple bridging endovascular interventions until a definitive repair was performed.

CONCLUSION

Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair may be used successfully as a bridging intervention to a definitive repair in children with life-threatening aortic complications following aortic coarctation repair.

Apparatus for Comparison of Pullout Forces for Various Thoracic Stent Grafts at Varying Neck Angulations and Oversizes

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to provide an apparatus for comparison of pullout forces for various thoracic stent grafts at varying neck angulations and oversizes.

METHODS

An in vitro platform capable of performing pullout tests was used on stent grafts in angulated silicone tubes designed for this study (0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° with a 32-mm inner diameter) in a temperature-controlled chamber (37 ± 2°C). Three commercial stent grafts with sizes commonly used in Taiwan (Valiant: 34, 36, 38, and 40 mm; Zenith TX2: 34, 36, 38, and 40 mm; and TAG: 34, 37, and 40 mm) were used, and each size was tested 8 times for each angulation condition.

RESULTS

The mean dislodgement forces (DFs) at 0° angulation within 10-20% oversize were approximately 22.7, 9.6, and 9.0 N for the Valiant, Zenith TX2, and TAG devices, respectively, whereas the mean DFs decreased by 46%, 38%, and 50% to 12.3, 5.9, and 4.5 N when the angulation reached 135°. Regression analysis shows that neck angulation was a significant factor for the Valiant and Zenith TX2 devices (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively) but not for the TAG device (P = 0.483). In addition, oversize and interactions between variables (angulation × oversize) exhibited significant effects on the DFs for all devices (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully built up an apparatus for comparison of pullout forces for various thoracic stent grafts at varying neck angulations and oversizes. With the empirical comparative data of different brand stent grafts under various conditions shown and compared, our findings suggest that aortic neck angulation has a negative correlation with stent-graft fixation. To have better stent-graft fixation and seal in the aortic arch for thoracic endovascular aortic repair, a longer landing zone with cautiously selected oversize is a more suitable selection.

An In Vitro Phantom Study on the Role of the Bird-Beak Configuration in Endograft Infolding in the Aortic Arch

Purpose: To assess endograft infolding for excessive bird-beak configurations in the aortic arch in relation to hemodynamic variables by quantifying device displacement and rotation of oversized stent-grafts deployed in a phantom model. Methods: A patient-specific, compliant, phantom pulsatile flow model was reconstructed from a patient who presented with collapse of a Gore TAG thoracic endoprosthesis. Device infolding was measured under different flow and pressure conditions for 3 protrusion extensions (13, 19, and 24 mm) of the bird-beak configuration resulting from 2 TAG endografts with oversizing of 11% and 45%, respectively. Results: The bird-beak configuration with the greatest protrusion extension exhibited the maximum TAG device displacement (1.66 mm), while the lowest protrusion extension configuration led to the minimum amount of both displacement and rotation parameters (0.25 mm and 0.6°, respectively). A positive relationship was found between the infolding parameters and the flow circulating in the aorta and left subclavian artery. Similarly, TAG device displacement was positively and significantly (p<0.05) correlated with the pulse pressure for all bird-beak configurations and device sizes. However, no collapse was observed under chronic perfusion testing maintained for 30 days and pulse pressure of 100 mm Hg. Conclusion: These findings suggest that endograft infolding depends primarily on the amount of aortic pulsatility and flow rate and that physiological flows do not necessarily engender hemodynamic loads on the proximal bird-beak segment sufficient to cause TAG collapse. Hemodynamic variables may allow for identification of patients at high risk of endograft infolding and help guide preventive intervention to avert its occurrence.

Endovascular management of rupture in acute type B aortic dissections

OBJECTIVE

Reports of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for complicated acute type B aortic dissection (ABAD) bring together a large range of clinical presentations. With a 30 day mortality of 50% when managed with open surgery, rupture is the most devastating complication of ABAD. This study investigated the outcome of TEVAR for ABAD complicated by rupture (r-ABAD) to assess the results of this particularly critical subgroup.

METHODS

A review of consecutive TEVAR for r-ABAD in two tertiary referral centers was performed using a prospectively maintained database.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2013, 24 patients (mean age 71 years; 14 males) underwent TEVAR for r-ABAD. Sixteen (67%) were in shock (Systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg) before surgery. Seven patients had coverage of the left subclavian artery, of whom four had partial arch debranching procedures via cervical access concomitant with TEVAR. Median length of aortic coverage was 150 mm, median proximal oversizing was 13.3% (range 6.2-33.3%). Technical success was achieved in 100%. There were four in hospital deaths (16%). Two patients (8%) had paraplegia, but neither stroke nor renal insufficiency requiring dialysis occurred. During a mean follow up of 28 months, there was one aortic dissection related death and eight patients (40% of the surviving patients) required re-intervention. All re-interventions were managed endovascularly. At last follow up CT scan, eight patients (40%) had complete remodeling of the aortic wall.

CONCLUSION

With 16% in hospital mortality and 8% early major complications, this study confirms the feasibility of TEVAR for r-ABAD with a lower peri-operative morbidity and mortality rate compared with open surgery. Given the high rate of re-intervention, close follow up is required in surviving patients.

Complicated type B aortic dissection should not be treated with uncovered stents: a lesson not yet learned

Whenever some basic rules for endovascular aortic repair of type B aortic dissection are not followed, iatrogenic complications may develop. A 64-year-old gentleman was referred to our institution for revision of previous treatment of complex type B aortic dissection with 2 bare stents. At 3 months, the most proximal aortic bare stent had entered, via the proximal tear, the false lumen. Aortic expansion and dynamic obstruction at the level of the renal arteries had also developed. In a first step, we removed the proximal aortic bare stent surgically. Few days later, 2 covered endografts were implanted into the true lumen of the thoracic aorta with clinical success. The rationale for using endovascular treatment in patients with complicated type B aortic dissection is coverage of the entry tear with covered nonoversized endografts. Negative results are achieved whenever these very simple rules are not strictly followed.

Multidetector CT findings of complications of surgical and endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms

Aortic aneurysms remain a significant problem in the population, and there is a concerted effort to identify, define, image, and treat these conditions to ultimately improve outcomes. The rapid development of diagnostic modalities, operative strategies, and endovascular techniques within the realm of this aortic disease has transformed the field and broadened the spectrum of patients that can be treated with minimally invasive techniques. This investigation has a broad spectrum of normal expected findings that must be differentiated from early or late complications in which intervention is required. In this article, normal and abnormal postoperative and post-TEVAR/EVAR MDCT findings are described.

Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: current endovascular perspectives

Thoracoabdominal aneurysms account for roughly 3% of identified aneurysms annually in the United States. Advancements in endovascular techniques and devices have broadened their application to these complex surgical problems. This paper will focus on the current state of endovascular thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair, including specific considerations in patient selection, operative planning, and perioperative complications. Both total endovascular and hybrid options will be considered.