Sublobar resection is equivalent to lobectomy for clinical stage 1A lung cancer in solid nodules

Simultaneous bilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery is safe and feasible for multiple primary lung cancers

BACKGROUND

The treatment for bilateral synchronous multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC) remains challenging. Simultaneous bilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) may be an optimal treatment with curative intent, but its safety and feasibility are controversial.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-eight patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral VATS (simultaneous group) and 79 who underwent two-staged bilateral VATS (two-staged group) were included in this study. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

The majority of patients were female and non-smokers. The most common surgical plan was lobectomy and contralateral wedge resection in both groups. There was no significant difference in the postoperative complication rate between the simultaneous groups and two-staged group (13.3% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.73). Patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral resection had shorter hospital stays, shorter anesthesia time and less chest drainage compared with those who underwent two-staged resection. Advanced TNM stage, complicated surgical plan and aggressive lymph node resection were risk factors for postoperative complications in simultaneous bilateral VATS. Patients in two groups had similar overall survival and disease free survival (p = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous bilateral VATS for bilateral lung nodule resection is as safe and feasible as two-staged bilateral VATS. Patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral resection had similar or even better outcomes compared to that of the two-staged group. Simultaneous bilateral VATS is potentially an optimal treatment option for patients with erarly cTNM stage and good physical condition.

A Radiological-Radiomics model for differentiation between minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and invasive adenocarcinoma less than or equal to 3 cm: A two-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To develop a Radiological-Radiomics (R-R) combined model for differentiation between minimal invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IA) of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and evaluate its predictive performance.

METHODS

The clinical, pathological, and imaging data of a total of 509 patients (522 lesions) with LUAD diagnosed by surgical pathology from 2 medical centres were retrospectively collected, with 392 patients (402 lesions) from center 1 trained and validated using a five-fold cross-validation method, and 117 patients (120 lesions) from center 2 serving as an independent external test set. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was utilized to filter features. Logistic regression was used to construct three models for predicting IA, namely, Radiological model, Radiomics model, and R-R model. Also, receiver operating curve curves (ROCs) were plotted, generating corresponding area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

RESULTS

The R-R model for IA prediction achieved an AUC of 0.918 (95 % CI: 0.889-0.947), a sensitivity of 80.3 %, a specificity of 88.2 %, and an accuracy of 82.1 % in the training set. In the validation set, this model exhibited an AUC of 0.906 (95 % CI: 0.842-0.970), a sensitivity of 79.9 %, a specificity of 88.1 %, and an accuracy of 81.8 %. In the external test set, the AUC was 0.894 (95 % CI: 0.824-0.964), a sensitivity of 84.8 %, a specificity of 78.6 %, and an accuracy of 83.3 %.

CONCLUSION

The R-R model showed excellent diagnostic performance in differentiating MIA and IA, which can provide a certain reference for clinical diagnosis and surgical treatment plans.

Effectiveness and safety of segmentectomy vs. wedge resection for the treatment of patients with operable non‑small cell lung cancer: A meta‑analysis and systematic review

The present study compared the differences in effectiveness and safety between segmentectomy (ST) and wedge resection (WR) in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for papers published from inception until July 2023. The inclusion criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and study designs. ROBINS-I was selected to assess the risk of bias and quality of evidence in the included non-randomised studies. Appropriate effect sizes were selected, and subgroup analyses, heterogeneity tests, sensitivity analyses and publication bias were applied. A total of 18 retrospective studies were included, involving 19,381 patients with operable NSCLC. The 5-year overall survival rate [hazard ratio (HR), 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04, 0.34; P=0.014; I2=76.3%], lung cancer-specific survival rate (HR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.21, 0.38; P<0.01; I2=13.8%) and metastasis rate [odds ratio (OR), 1.56; 95% CI, 1.03, 2.38; P=0.037] in patients with operable NSCLC treated with WR were worse than those in patients treated with ST. The incidence of postoperative complications (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23, 0.82) in the WR group was lower than in the ST treatment group. There was no difference in postoperative recurrence (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 0.97, 4.74; P=0.058) and mortality (risk difference, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.03, 0.11; P=0.287) between groups. Based on current evidence, patients with NSCLC treated with ST surgery have better postoperative survival but more complications than those patients treated with WT, while the effect of WR and ST on the recurrence rate and distant metastasis rate remains controversial.

Impact of Tumor Size and Differentiation Grade on Survival After Lobectomy and Segmentectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of tumor size and differentiation grade on long term survival in patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) after lobectomy and segmentectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage T1-2N0M0 LUAD who underwent lobectomy and segmentectomy were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients were stratified as grade I (well differentiated), grade II (moderately differentiated), and grade III/IV (poorly differentiated/undifferentiated) carcinomas. The effect of tumor size on overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) was evaluated using the multivariate Cox regression model, including the interaction between tumor size, type of surgery, and tumor differentiation grade. The inverse probability of treatment weighting method was used to adjust for bias between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 19,857 patients were identified, including 18,759 (94.4%) who underwent lobectomy and 1098 (5.5%) who underwent segmentectomy. A three-way interaction among tumor size, differentiation grade, and type of surgery was observed in the overall cohort. After stratifying by differentiation grade, plots of interaction revealed that lobectomy was associated with improved survival compared with segmentectomy when the tumor size exceeded 23 mm for grade I LUAD and 14 mm for grade II LUAD. No interaction was observed between the studied factors in grade III/IV carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

This study interpreted the interaction between tumor size and type of surgery on long-term survival in patients with early stage LUAD and established a tumor size threshold beyond which lobectomy provided survival benefits compared with segmentectomy.

Bibliometric analysis of the top 100 highly cited articles on sublobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this research is to pinpoint the top 100 most frequently referenced studies on sublobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

We identified the top 100 most frequently referenced studies on sublobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer by searching the Web of Science database. We extracted key information from the selected studies, including the author, journal, impact factor, type of article, year of publication, country, organization, and keyword.

RESULTS

To the best of our understanding, this is the inaugural bibliometric study on sublobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. The publication years of the top 100 most frequently referenced studies span from 1994 to 2022, with citation counts ranging from 51 to 795. The majority of the included studies are original (93/100) and primarily retrospective studies (82/93). The United States leads in terms of published articles and citations, with the Annals of Thoracic Surgery being the most frequently sourced journal (n = 27). High-density keywords primarily originate from limited resection, lobectomy, survival, carcinoma, recurrence, randomized trial, radiotherapy, lung cancer, outcome, 2 cm, as revealed by CiteSpace analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our research compiles and analyzes the top 100 most frequently referenced studies in the field of sublobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. The United States has the most published and cited works on this topic. Currently, the hot keywords for sublobectomy research are gradually shifting towards prognosis and obtaining better evidence-based medical evidence to demonstrate its value in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Real-World Survival Comparisons Between Radiotherapy and Surgery for Metachronous Second Primary Lung Cancer and Predictions of Lung Cancer-Specific Outcomes Using Machine Learning: Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Metachronous second primary lung cancer (MSPLC) is not that rare but is seldom studied.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to compare real-world survival outcomes between different surgery strategies and radiotherapy for MSPLC.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data collected from patients with MSPLC between 1988 and 2012 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) analyses and machine learning were performed to compare variables between patients with MSPLC. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

A total of 2451 MSPLC patients were categorized into the following treatment groups: 864 (35.3%) received radiotherapy, 759 (31%) underwent surgery, 89 (3.6%) had surgery plus radiotherapy, and 739 (30.2%) had neither treatment. After PSM, 470 pairs each for radiotherapy and surgery were generated. The surgery group had significantly better survival than the radiotherapy group (P<.001) and the untreated group (563 pairs; P<.001). Further analysis revealed that both wedge resection (85 pairs; P=.004) and lobectomy (71 pairs; P=.002) outperformed radiotherapy in overall survival for MSPLC patients. Machine learning models (extreme gradient boosting, random forest classifier, adaptive boosting) demonstrated high predictive performance based on area under the curve (AUC) values. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis identified 9 significant variables impacting cancer-specific survival, emphasizing surgery's consistent influence across 1 year to 10 years. These variables encompassed age at diagnosis, sex, year of diagnosis, radiotherapy of initial primary lung cancer (IPLC), primary site, histology, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy of MPSLC. Competing risk analysis highlighted lower mortality for female MPSLC patients (hazard ratio [HR]=0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.87) and recent IPLC diagnoses (HR=0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.85), while radiotherapy for IPLC increased mortality (HR=1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.50). Surgery alone had the lowest cancer-specific mortality (HR=0.83, 95% CI 0.81-0.85), with sublevel resection having the lowest mortality rate among the surgical approaches (HR=0.26, 95% CI 0.21-0.31). The findings provide valuable insights into the factors that influence cumulative cancer-specific mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resections such as wedge resection and lobectomy confer better survival than radiation therapy for MSPLC, but radiation can be a valid alternative for the treatment of MSPLC.

Development and validation of a model for predicting upstage in minimally invasive lung adenocarcinoma in Chinese people

BACKGROUND

Sublobar resection for ground-glass opacity became a recommend surgery choice supported by the JCOG0804/JCOG0802/JCOG1211 results. Sublobar resection includes segmentectomy and wedge resection, wedge resection is suitable for non-invasive lesions, but in clinical practice, when pathologists are uncertain about the intraoperative frozen diagnosis of invasive lesions, difficulty in choosing the appropriate operation occurs. The purpose of this study was to analyze how to select invasive lesions with clinic-pathological characters.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 134 cases of pulmonary nodules diagnosed with minimally invasive adenocarcinoma by intraoperative freezing examination. The patients were divided into two groups according to intraoperative frozen results: the minimally invasive adenocarcinoma group and the at least minimally invasive adenocarcinoma group. A variety of clinical features were collected. Chi-square tests and multiple regression logistic analysis were used to screen out independent risk factors related to pathological upstage, and then ROC curves were established. In addition, an independent validation set included 1164 cases was collected.

RESULTS

Independent risk factors related to pathological upstage were CT value, maximum tumor diameter, and frozen result of AL-MIA. The AUC of diagnostic mode was 71.1% [95%CI: 60.8-81.3%]. The independent validation included 1164 patients, 417 (35.8%) patients had paraffin-based pathology of invasive adenocarcinoma. The AUC of diagnostic mode was 75.7% [95%CI: 72.9-78.4%].

CONCLUSIONS

The intraoperative frozen diagnosis was AL-MIA, maximum tumor diameter larger than 15 mm and CT value is more than - 450Hu, highly suggesting that the lung GGO was invasive adenocarcinoma which represent a higher risk to recurrence. For these patients, sublobectomy would be insufficient, lobectomy or complementary treatment is encouraged.

Outcomes of Completion Lobectomy for Locoregional Recurrence after Sublobar Resection in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

This retrospective study aimed to determine the treatment patterns and the surgical and oncologic outcomes after completion lobectomy (CL) in patients with locoregionally recurrent stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who previously underwent sublobar resection.

Methods

Data from 36 patients who initially underwent sublobar resection for clinical, pathological stage IA NSCLC and experienced locoregional recurrence between 2008 and 2016 were analyzed.

Results

Thirty-six (3.6%) of 1,003 patients who underwent sublobar resection for NSCLC experienced locoregional recurrence. The patients' median age was 66.5 (range, 44-77) years at the initial operation, and 28 (77.8%) patients were men. Six (16.7%) patients underwent segmentectomy and 30 (83.3%) underwent wedge resection as the initial operation. The median follow-up from the initial operation was 56 (range, 9-150) months. Ten (27.8%) patients underwent CL, 22 (61.1%) underwent non-surgical treatments (chemotherapy, radiation, concurrent chemoradiation therapy), and 4 (11.1%) did not receive treatment or were lost to follow-up after recurrence. Patients who underwent CL experienced no significant complications or deaths. The median follow-up time after CL was 64.5 (range, 19-93) months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) were higher in the surgical group than in the non-surgical (p<0.001) and no-treatment groups (p<0.001).

Conclusion

CL is a technically demanding but safe procedure for locoregionally recurrent stage I NSCLC after sublobar resection. Patients who underwent CL had better OS and PRS than patients who underwent non-surgical treatments or no treatments; however, a larger cohort study and long-term surveillance are necessary.

Prospective Cohort Study to Compare Long-Term Lung Cancer-Specific and All-Cause Survival of Clinical Early Stage (T1a-b; ≤20 mm) NSCLC Treated by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Surgery

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to compare outcomes of patients with first primary clinical T1a-bN0M0 NSCLC treated with surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

METHODS

We identified patients with first primary clinical T1a-bN0M0 NSCLCs on last pretreatment computed tomography treated by surgery or SBRT in the following two prospective cohorts: International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP) and Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment (IELCART). Lung cancer-specific survival and all-cause survival after diagnosis were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline demographics and comorbidities and analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Of 1115 patients with NSCLC, 1003 had surgery and 112 had SBRT; 525 in I-ELCAP in 1992 to 2021 and 590 in IELCART in 2016 to 2021. Median follow-up was 57.6 months. Ten-year lung cancer-specific survival was not significantly different: 90% (95% confidence interval: 87%-92%) for surgery versus 88% (95% confidence interval: 77%-99%) for SBRT, p = 0.55. Cox regression revealed no significant difference in lung cancer-specific survival for the combined cohorts (p = 0.48) or separately for I-ELCAP (p = 1.00) and IELCART (p = 1.00). Although 10-year all-cause survival was significantly different (75% versus 45%, p < 0.0001), after propensity score matching, all-cause survival using Cox regression was no longer different for the combined cohorts (p = 0.74) or separately for I-ELCAP (p = 1.00) and IELCART (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

This first prospectively collected cohort analysis of long-term survival of small, early NSCLCs revealed that lung cancer-specific survival was high for both treatments and not significantly different (p = 0.48) and that all-cause survival after propensity matching was not significantly different (p = 0.74). This supports SBRT as an alternative treatment option for small, early NSCLCs which is especially important with their increasing frequency owing to low-dose computed tomography screening. Furthermore, treatment decisions are influenced by many different factors and should be personalized on the basis of the unique circumstances of each patient.

Differential efficacy of segmentectomy and wedge resection in sublobar resection compared to lobectomy for solid-dominant stage IA lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, the impact of sublobar resection versus lobectomy on the prognosis of solid-dominant stage IA lung cancer is contradictory in different studies, which requires further exploration.

METHODS

The authors analyzed 26 studies, including one randomized controlled trial and retrospective cohort studies. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects models based on heterogeneity levels.

RESULTS

The analysis included 12 667 patients, with 3488 undergoing sublobar resections and 9179 receiving lobectomies. The overall analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) (HR=1.28, 95% CI: 0.98-1.69) between sublobar resection and lobectomy, but lobectomy was associated with better recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR=1.39, 95% CI: 1.10-1.75). Subgroup analyses revealed that, for tumors with a diameter ≤2 cm, sublobar resection versus lobectomy showed no significant difference in OS but sublobar resection had lower RFS. For 2-3 cm tumors, both OS and RFS were significantly lower in the sublobar resection group. When consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) ranged from 0.5 to <1, OS did not differ significantly, but RFS was significantly lower in sublobar resection. Lung cancers with CTR=1 showed significantly lower OS and RFS in the sublobar resection group. Segmentectomy provided similar OS and RFS compared to lobectomy, while wedge resection had a detrimental effect on patient prognosis. However, wedge resection may have provided comparable outcomes for patients aged 75 years or older.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that segmentectomy and lobectomy yield similar oncological outcomes. However, compared to lobectomy, wedge resection is associated with a poorer prognosis. Nevertheless, for elderly patients, wedge resection is also a reasonable surgical option.

Single-Stage Surgical Procedure for Patients with Primary Esophageal and Lung Cancers

BACKGROUND

 The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of simultaneous surgery for patients with primary esophageal and lung cancers.

METHODS

 Patients with primary esophageal and lung cancers who underwent simultaneous surgical procedures between January 2016 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The data of patients who underwent esophagectomy and lobectomy (group EL) were compared with those of patients who underwent esophagectomy and sublobar resection (group ES).

RESULTS

 A total of 21 patients were included with an average age of 64.62 ± 5.24 years. Group EL contained 8 patients and group ES contained 13 patients. All procedures were completed uneventfully with a mean operative time of 251.19 ± 66.93 minutes. Pulmonary complications occurred in six (28.57%) patients. Other complications included anastomotic leakage in 1 patient, pleural effusion requiring drainage in 8 patients, atrial fibrillation in 2 patients, and incision infection in 1 patient. All patients were followed up for 30.23 ± 21.82 months. During the follow-up period, nine patients had a recurrence of cancer and died of tumor progression, and one patient died of a tracheothoracogastric fistula. Complications and mortality in group EL did not increase when compared to those in group ES.

CONCLUSION

 It is safe and feasible to perform a single-stage surgical procedure for patients with primary esophageal and lung cancers. Simultaneous esophagectomy and lobectomy did not increase postoperative complications or mortality compared with esophagectomy and sublobar resection.

Effect of segmental versus lobectomy in minimally invasive surgery on postoperative wound complications in lung cancer patients: A meta-analysis

It is still a matter of debate whether the surgical segmentectomy and lobectomy of lung cancer are comparable in the incidence of perioperative wound complications. An extensive review of the literature through August 2023 was carried out with a critical review of four databases. Following the acceptance and elimination criteria set out in the trial, as well as a qualitative assessment of the literature, this resulted in a review of related research that compared the results of both lobectomy and partial resection in the management of lung cancer. The analysis of the data was performed with the RevMan 5.3 software, and the 95% confidence interval [CI] and odds ratio [OR] were performed with either stationary or random-effect models. It is concluded that the operation time of lobectomy is shorter than that of sectioning in the treatment of segmentectomy (mean difference [MD], -38.62; 95% CI, -41.96, -35.28; p < 0.0001). But the rate of postoperative wound infection (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.18, 2.15; p = 0.45) and intraoperative blood loss (MD, 17.54; 95% CI, -4.19, 39.26; p = 0.11) were not significantly different for them. Thus, for those who have received a pulmonary carcinoma operation, different operative methods might not have an impact on the incidence of postoperative wound infections. The operative procedure appears to have a major impact on the length of the operation in patients.

A nomogram for predicting invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as pure ground-glass nodules: incorporating subjective CT signs and histogram parameters based on artificial intelligence

PURPOSE

To construct a nomogram based on subjective CT signs and artificial intelligence (AI) histogram parameters to identify invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma presenting as pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) and to evaluate its diagnostic performance.

METHODS

187 patients with 228 pGGNs confirmed by postoperative pathology were collected retrospectively and divided into pre-invasive group [atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)] and invasive group [minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC)]. All pGGNs were randomly assigned to training cohort (n = 160) and validation cohort (n = 68). Nomogram was developed using subjective CT signs and AI-based histogram parameters by logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) curve.

RESULTS

The nomogram was constructed with nodule shape, 3D mean diameter, maximum CT value, and skewness. It showed better discriminative power in differentiating invasive lesions from pre-invasive lesions with area under curve (AUC) of 0.849 (95% CI 0.790-0.909) in the training cohort and 0.831 (95% CI 0.729-0.934) in the validation cohort, which performed better than nodule shape (AUC 0.675, 95% CI 0.609-0.741), 3D mean diameter (AUC 0.762, 95% CI 0.688-0.835), maximum CT value (AUC 0.794, 95% CI 0.727-0.862), or skewness (AUC 0.594, 95% CI 0.506-0.682) alone in training cohort (for all, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For pulmonary pGGNs, the nomogram based on subjective CT signs and AI histogram parameters had a good predictive ability to discriminate invasive lung adenocarcinoma from pre-invasive lung adenocarcinoma, and it has the potential to improve diagnostic efficiency and to help the patient management.

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2023 Expert Consensus Document: Staging and multidisciplinary management of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Novel targeted therapy and immunotherapy drugs have recently been approved for use in patients with surgically resectable lung cancer. Accurate staging, early molecular testing, and knowledge of recent trials are critical to optimize oncologic outcomes in these patients.

Wedge resection versus lobectomy in T1 lung cancer patients: a propensity matched analysis

OBJECTIVES

Performing wedge resection rather than lobectomy for primary lung cancer remains controversial. Recent studies demonstrate no survival advantage for non-anatomical resection compared to lobectomy in patients with early-stage lung cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate whether in patients with T1 tumours, non-anatomical wedge resection is associated with equivalent survival to lobectomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent lung resection at the Lancashire Cardiac Centre between April 2005 and April 2018. Patients were subjected to multidisciplinary team discussion. The extent of resection was decided by the team based on British Thoracic Society guidelines. The primary outcome was overall survival. Propensity matching of patients with T1 tumours was also performed to determine whether differences in survival rates exist in a subset of these patients with balanced pre-operative characteristics.

RESULTS

There were 187 patients who underwent non-anatomical wedge resection and 431 patients who underwent lobectomy. Cox modelling demonstrated no survival difference between groups for the first 1.6 years then a risk of death 3-fold higher for wedge resection group after 1.6 years (HR 3.14, CI 1.98-4.79). Propensity matching yielded 152 pairs for which 5-year survival was 66.2% for the lobectomy group and 38.5% for the non-anatomical wedge group (SMD = 0.58, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-anatomical wedge resection was associated with significantly reduced 5-year survival compared to lobectomy in matched patients. Lobectomy should remain the standard of care for patients with early-stage lung cancer who are fit enough to undergo surgical resection.

The Role of Sublobar Resection for the Surgical Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cancer killer in the world. The standard of care for surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer has been lobectomy. Recent studies have identified that sublobar resection has non-inferior survival rates compared to lobectomy, however. Sublobar resection may increase the number of patients who can tolerate surgery and reduce postoperative pulmonary decline. Sublobar resection appears to have equivalent results to surgery in patients with small, peripheral tumors and no lymph node disease. As the utilization of segmentectomy increases, there may be some centers that perform this operation more than other centers. Care must be taken to ensure that all patients have access to this modality. Future investigations should focus on examining the outcomes from segmentectomy as it is applied more widely. When employed on a broad scale, morbidity and survival rates should be monitored. As segmentectomy is performed more frequently, patients may experience improved postoperative quality of life while maintaining the same oncologic benefit.

Clinical and Oncological Outcomes after Uniportal Anatomical Segmentectomy for Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background and Objectives: The existing literature comparing sublobar and lobar resection in the treatment of stage IA lung cancer highlights the trend and overall need for further evaluation of minimally invasive, parenchymal-sparing techniques. The role of uniportal minimally invasive segmentectomy in the oncological therapy of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and midterm oncological outcomes of patients who underwent uniportal video-assisted anatomical segmentectomy for pathological stage IA lung cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients with pathological stage IA lung cancer (8th edition UICC) who underwent uniportal minimally invasive anatomical segmentectomy at our institution from January 2015 to December 2018. Results: 85 patients, 54 of whom were men, were included. The median length of hospital stay was 3 days (1.-3. IQR 3-5), whereas 30-day morbidity was 15.3% (13 patients), and the in-hospital mortality rate was 1.2% (1 patient). The 3-year overall survival rate was 87.9% for the total population. It was 90.5% in the IA1 group, 93.3% in the IA2 group, and 70.1% in the IA3 group, respectively. Conclusions: There were satisfactory short-term clinical outcomes with low 30-day morbidity and mortality and promising midterm oncological survival results following uniportal minimally invasive anatomical segmentectomy for pathological stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.

Sub-Lobar Resection: The New Standard of Care for Early-Stage Lung Cancer

The Lung Cancer Study Group previously established lobectomy as the standard of care for treatment of clinical T1N0 NSCLC. Advances in imaging technology and refinements in staging have prompted a re-investigation to determine the non-inferiority of sub-lobar resections to lobectomies. Two recent randomized studies, JCOG 0802 and CALGB 140503, are reviewed here in the context of LCSG 0821. The studies confirm non-inferiority for sub-lobar resection (wedge or segmentectomy) compared to lobectomy for peripheral T1N0 NSCLC less than or equal to 2 cm. Sub-lobar resection should therefore be considered the new standard of care in this sub-set of patients with NSCLC.

A Unique Gene Signature Predicting Recurrence Free Survival in Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma

Objective

Resected stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) has a reported 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS) of 63-81%. A unique gene signature stratifying patients with early stage LUAD as high or low-risk of recurrence would be valuable.

Methods

GEO datasets combining European and North American LUAD patients (n=684) were filtered for stage IA (n=105) to develop a robust signature for recurrence (RFSscore). Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess associations of gene expression with RFS and OS. Leveraging a bootstrap approach of these identified upregulated genes allowed construction of a model which was evaluated by Area Under the Received Operating Characteristics. The optimal signature has RFSscore calculated via a linear combination of expression of selected genes weighted by the corresponding Cox regression derived coefficients. Log-rank analysis calculated RFS and OS. Results were validated using the LUAD TCGA transcriptomic NGS based dataset.

Results

Rigorous bioinformatic analysis identified a signature of 4 genes: KNSTRN, PAFAH1B3, MIF, CHEK1. Kaplan-Meier analysis of stage IA LUAD with this signature resulted in 5-year RFS for low-risk of 90% compared to 53% for high-risk (HR 6.55, 95%CI 2.65-16.18, p-value <0.001), confirming the robustness of the gene signature with its clinical significance. Validation of the signature using TCGA dataset resulted in an AUC of 0.797 and 5-year RFS for low and high-risk stage IA patients being 91% and 67%, respectively (HR 3.44, 95%CI 1.16-10.23, p-value=0.044).

Conclusions

This 4 gene signature stratifies European and North American patients with pathologically confirmed stage IA LUAD into low and high-risk groups for OS and more importantly RFS.

Wedge Resection Versus Segmentectomy for Older Patients With Stage IA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Anatomic lung resection remains the standard of care for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but wedge resection may offer similar survival in older adult patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the survival of patients aged 80 y and older undergoing wedge resection versus segmentectomy for stage IA NSCLC using a large clinical registry.

METHODS

Patients aged 80 y and older in the National Cancer Database who underwent wedge resection or segmentectomy for cT1a-b N0 M0 NSCLC between 2004 and 2018 were identified for an analysis. Survival was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, propensity-score matching, and inverse probability weighting. A subgroup analysis of patients who underwent lymph node evaluation with their wedge resection or segmentectomy was also performed.

RESULTS

Of the 2690 patients identified, 2272 (84%) underwent wedge resection and 418 (16%) underwent segmentectomy. Wedge resection was associated with worse 5-year overall survival relative to segmentectomy in multivariable-adjusted (adjusted Hazard Ratio: 1.26, [1.06-1.51], P = 0.01) and propensity score-matched analysis (49% [95% confidence interval {CI}: 42%-55%] versus 59% [95% CI: 52%-65%], P = 0.02). Among a subgroup of 1221 wedge resection and 347 segmentectomy patients who also received intraoperative lymph node evaluation, however, there were no significant differences in 5-year survival in multivariable-adjusted (adjusted Hazard Ratio: 1.12, [0.90-1.39], P = 0.31) or propensity score-matched analysis (55% [95% CI: 48%-62%] versus 61% [95% CI: 54%-68%], P = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

In this national analysis, there were no significant differences in survival between older adult patients with stage IA NSCLC who underwent wedge resection versus segmentectomy when a lymph node evaluation was performed.

Impact of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor spread through air spaces

OBJECTIVES

Tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) is a unique mechanism of lung cancer metastasis; however, its clinical value for stage I lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) remains unclear at present. We investigated the (1) prognosis of patients after sublobar resection compared with lobectomy for stage I lung adenocarcinoma with STAS; and (2) potential benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with stage I ADC and STAS.

METHODS

A total of 3328 consecutive patients with stage I ADC were retrospectively identified between 2014 and 2018 at our institution; among them, 600 were diagnosed with STAS. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the impact of STAS on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

Among stage IA patients with STAS, there was no significant difference between those who underwent sublobar resection and lobectomy in OS (P = 0.919) and RFS (P = 0.066). Multivariate analysis confirmed this result (sublobar resection versus lobectomy, OS: HR = 0.523, 95 % CI, 0.056-18.458, P = 0.714; RFS, HR = 0.360, 95 % CI, 0.115-1.565, P = 0.897). ACT did not improve the prognosis of stage IA patients but did improve the RFS of stage IB patients with high-risk recurrence factors, including poorly differentiated tumors, lymphovascular invasion and visceral pleural invasion (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Sublobar and lobectomy resection provided a comparable prognosis for stage IA ADC patients with STAS. When STAS was confirmed postoperatively, ACT should be considered for patients with stage IB with high-risk recurrence factors but not for those with stage IA disease.

Association of the Extent of Resection with Survival in Multiple Primary Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The incidence of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (SMPLC) has progressively increased, due to recent advances in imaging. To date, no guidelines defining recommendations for patients' selection and no standard treatment of cases with SMPLC have been defined.The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess survival among patients treated with lobectomy or sublobar resection MPLC.

METHODS

Comprehensive literature search of Medline, the Cochrane Library, reference lists, and ongoing studies was performed according to a prospectively registered design (PROSPERO: CRD42019115487). All studies published between 1998 and December 2020 that examined treatments with lobectomy compared to sublobar resection were included. Two double-blind investigators independently selected articles.Primary outcomes were to assess the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate among patients treated with lobectomy or sublobar resection and the impact of lymph node status on 5-year OS and 5-year disease-free survival in patients with MPLC.

RESULTS

The search yielded 424 articles; 4 observational studies met the inclusion criteria and collectively evaluated 298 patients with a mean age ranging from 61.5 to 67 years. A total of 112 patients were treated for bilateral synchronous tumors and 186 patients for unilateral multiple synchronous tumors. All included studies showed that the type of resection, lobectomy or limited resection, had no significant impact on survival.

CONCLUSION

Limited resection is a valuable treatment option for MPLC. However, the clinical level of evidence of the studies found is low and randomized studies are needed to clarify the extent of resection in MPLC.

Lobar or Sublobar Resection for Peripheral Stage IA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The increased detection of small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has renewed interest in sublobar resection in lieu of lobectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, noninferiority, phase 3 trial in which patients with NSCLC clinically staged as T1aN0 (tumor size, ≤2 cm) were randomly assigned to undergo sublobar resection or lobar resection after intraoperative confirmation of node-negative disease. The primary end point was disease-free survival, defined as the time between randomization and disease recurrence or death from any cause. Secondary end points were overall survival, locoregional and systemic recurrence, and pulmonary functions.

RESULTS

From June 2007 through March 2017, a total of 697 patients were assigned to undergo sublobar resection (340 patients) or lobar resection (357 patients). After a median follow-up of 7 years, sublobar resection was noninferior to lobar resection for disease-free survival (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 1.01; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.24). In addition, overall survival after sublobar resection was similar to that after lobar resection (hazard ratio for death, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.26). The 5-year disease-free survival was 63.6% (95% CI, 57.9 to 68.8) after sublobar resection and 64.1% (95% CI, 58.5 to 69.0) after lobar resection. The 5-year overall survival was 80.3% (95% CI, 75.5 to 84.3) after sublobar resection and 78.9% (95% CI, 74.1 to 82.9) after lobar resection. No substantial difference was seen between the two groups in the incidence of locoregional or distant recurrence. At 6 months postoperatively, a between-group difference of 2 percentage points was measured in the median percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, favoring the sublobar-resection group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with peripheral NSCLC with a tumor size of 2 cm or less and pathologically confirmed node-negative disease in the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes, sublobar resection was not inferior to lobectomy with respect to disease-free survival. Overall survival was similar with the two procedures. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; CALGB 140503 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00499330.).

Patterns of Postoperative Changes in Lung Volume and Perfusion Assessed by Dual-Energy CT: Comparison of Lobectomy and Limited Resection

BACKGROUND. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and perfusion scintigraphy have limited utility for evaluating postoperative changes in regional pulmonary function after lung cancer resection surgery. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative changes in lung volume and perfusion, as assessed by dual-energy CT (DECT), between patients undergoing surgical resection of lung cancer by lobectomy versus limited resection as well as to assess associations between such changes and the lobar location of the resected tumor. METHODS. This study entailed a retrospective post hoc analysis of a prospective study that enrolled patients awaiting lung cancer resection surgery between March 2019 and February 2020. Eighty-one patients (38 men and 43 women; mean age, 60.5 ± 8.9 [SD] years), 43 of whom underwent lobectomy and 38 of whom underwent limited resection, were included. Patients underwent thoracic DECT and PFT evaluation preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Pulmonary lobes were segmented. Lobar lung volume and lung perfusion ratios (both relative to whole-lung values) were computed. Perfusion measures reflected DECT-derived iodine content. Patients completed 6-month postoperative quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires. RESULTS. Patients undergoing lobectomy, compared with those undergoing limited resection, had greater increases in the lung volume ratio of the ipsilateral nonresected lobe(s) (mean, 42.3% ± 24.2% [SD] vs 22.9% ± 13.2%, p < .001) and the contralateral lung (mean, 14.6% ± 14.0% vs 6.4% ± 6.9%, p = .002) as well as greater increases in the lung perfusion ratio of the ipsilateral nonresected lobe(s) (mean, 39.9% ± 20.7% [SD] vs 22.8% ± 17.8%, p < .001) and the contralateral lung (mean, 20.9% ± 9.4% vs 4.3% ± 5.6%, p < .001). In patients with right lower lobe tumors, the largest postoperative increases in the lung volume ratio were in the right middle lobe in those undergoing lobectomy (mean, 44.1% ± 21.0%) and limited resection (mean, 24.6% ± 14.5%), whereas the largest postoperative increase in the lung perfusion ratio was in the left lower lobe in those undergoing lobectomy (mean, 53.9% ± 8.6%) and in the right middle lobe in those undergoing limited resection (mean, 32.5% ± 24.1%). Otherwise, the largest increases in lung volume and perfusion ratios occurred in the ipsilateral nonresected lobes (vs the contra-lateral lobes), regardless of the operative approach used and the lobar location. Changes in the lung volume and perfusion ratios in the ipsilateral lobe(s) and the contralateral lung showed weak correlations with certain quality-of-life scores (e.g., for role functioning: ρ = 0.234-0.279 [volume] and -0.233 to -0.284 [perfusion]). CONCLUSION. DECT depicts patterns of lung volume and perfusion changes after lung cancer surgery, depending on the surgical approach (lobectomy vs limited resection) used and the lobar location of the tumor. CLINICAL IMPACT. DECT-derived metrics can help understand variable physiologic impacts of lung cancer resection surgeries.

Three-Dimensional Near-Infrared Specimen Mapping Can Identify the Distance from the Tumor to the Surgical Margin During Resection of Pulmonary Ground Glass Opacities

BACKGROUND

Lung cancers can recur locally due to inadequate resection margins. Achieving adequate margin distances is challenging in pulmonary ground glass opacities (GGOs) because they are not easily palpable. To improve margin assessment during resection of GGOs, we propose a novel technique, three-dimensional near-infrared specimen mapping (3D-NSM).

METHODS

Twenty patients with a cT1 GGO were enrolled and received a fluorescent tracer preoperatively. After resection, specimens underwent 3D-NSM in the operating room. Margins were graded as positive or negative based upon fluorescence at the staple line. Images were analyzed using ImageJ to quantify the distance from the tumor edge to the nearest staple line. This margin distance calculated by 3D-NSM was compared to the margin distance reported on final pathology several days postoperatively.

RESULTS

3D-NSM identified 20/20 GGOs with no false positive or false negative diagnoses. Mean fluorescence intensity for lesions was 110.92 arbitrary units (A.U.) (IQR: 77.77-122.03 A.U.) compared to 23.68 A.U. (IQR: 19.60-27.06 A.U.) for background lung parenchyma (p < 0.0001). There were 4 tumor-positive or close margins in the study cohort, and all 4 (100%) were identified by 3D-NSM. 3D-NSM margin distances were nearly identical to margin distances reported on final pathology (R2 = 0.9362). 3D-NSM slightly under-predicted margin distance, and the median difference in margins was 1.9 mm (IQR 0.5-4.3 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

3D-NSM rapidly localizes GGOs by fluorescence and detects tumor-positive or close surgical margins. 3D-NSM can accurately quantify the resection margin distance as compared to formal pathology, which allows surgeons to rapidly determine whether sublobar resection margin distances are adequate.

Prognostic Significance of the Maximum Standardized Uptake Value on the Prognosis of Clinical Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on the 8th Edition TNM Classification

BACKGROUND

There are few reports on the utility of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for predicting the prognosis of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma based on the latest tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification. This study aimed to determine whether clinicopathologic factors, including the SUVmax, affect prognosis in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 527 patients with c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma who underwent lobectomy or greater resection between 2011 and 2017. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test. Factors associated with RFS and OS were determined using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

RFS was significantly different based on tumor stage. In contrast, there was no significant difference in OS between patients with stage IA2 and IA3 disease (p = 0.794), although there were significant differences in OS between patients with stage IA1 and IA2 disease (p = 0.024) and between patients with stage IA1 and IA3 disease (p = 0.012). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SUVmax was independently associated with both RFS and OS among patients with c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (RFS, p = 0.017; OS, p = 0.047). Further, even though there was no significant difference in OS between patients with stage IA2 and IA3 disease (n = 410), SUVmax was able to stratify patients with high and low RFS and OS among these patients (RFS, p < 0.001; OS, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SUVmax was an important preoperative factor to evaluate prognosis among patients with c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma as well as the current TNM classification.

A novel nomogram to predict lymph node metastasis in cT1 non-small-cell lung cancer based on PET/CT and peripheral blood cell parameters

BACKGROUND

Accurately evaluating the lymph node status preoperatively is critical in determining the appropriate treatment plan for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This study aimed to construct a novel nomogram to predict the probability of lymph node metastasis in clinical T1 stage patients based on non-invasive and easily accessible indicators.

METHODS

From October 2019 to June 2022, the data of 84 consecutive cT1 NSCLC patients who had undergone PET/CT examination within 30 days before surgery were retrospectively collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors of lymph node metastasis. A nomogram based on these predictors was constructed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the calibration curve was used for assessment. Besides, the model was confirmed by bootstrap resampling.

RESULTS

Four predictors (tumor SUVmax value, lymph node SUVmax value, consolidation tumor ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio) were identified and entered into the nomogram. The model indicated certain discrimination, with an area under ROC curve of 0.921(95%CI 0.866-0.977). The calibration curve showed good concordance between the predicted and actual possibility of lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

This nomogram was practical and effective in predicting lymph node metastasis for patients with cT1 NSCLC. It could provide treatment recommendations to clinicians.

Subsegmentectomy versus segmentectomy resection for the treatment of operable patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Background

There were new points of interest in performing subsegmentectomy and segmentectomy for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether patients who underwent subsegmentectomy could obtain satisfactory clinical outcomes remains unclear. The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and security of surgical procedures between subsegmentectomy and segmentectomy.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed through five online databases to identify the included literatures which presented intact clinical outcome data among different surgical procedures. The included studies were evaluated based on precise and predefined inclusion criteria.

Results

There were 4 published studies identified in this meta-analysis. A total of 325 patients who underwent subsegmentectomy and 904 patients who underwent segmentectomy were involved in this analysis. The duration of drainage [MD -0.19; 95%CI (-0.36, -0.02), p = 0.03] and postoperative hospital stay [MD -0.30; 95%CI (-0.58, -0.02), p = 0.009] of subsegmentectomy were significantly less than that of segmentectomy. There was no statistically significant difference among recurrence rate [OR 0.85; 95%CI (0.21, 3.42), p = 0.82], operation time, blood loss, incidence of complications [OR 0.83; 95%CI (0.58, 1.20), p = 0.33] between subsegmentectomy and segmentectomy in patients with stage IA NSCLC.

Conclusion

The meta-analysis was firstly performed to compare perioperative outcomes among surgical procedures. The perioperative outcomes were comparable between subsegmentectomy and segmentectomy. Subsegmentectomy might be an alternative treatment for the deep tumor with size less than 1.5 cm and mainly composed of Ground Glass Opacity (GGO).

Clinical application of VATS combined with 3D-CTBA in anatomical basal segmentectomy

Objective

This study aimed to summarize the clinical application experience of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) combined with three-dimensional computed tomography-bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA) in anatomical basal segmentectomy.

Methods

Clinical data of 42 patients who underwent bilateral lower sub-basal segmentectomy by VATS combined with 3D-CTBA in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed; the patients included 20 males and 22 females, with a median age of 48 (30-65) years. Combined with the preoperative enhanced CT and 3D-CTBA techniques to identify the altered bronchi, arteries, and veins during the operation, the anatomical resection of each basal segment of both lower lungs was completed through the fissure approach or inferior pulmonary vein approach.

Results

All operations were successfully completed without conversion to thoracotomy or lobectomy. The median operation time was 125 (90-176) min, the median intraoperative blood loss was 15 (10-50) mL, the median postoperative thoracic drainage time was 3 (2-17) days, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 5 (3-20) days. The median number of resected lymph nodes was 6 (5-8). There was no in-hospital death. Postoperative pulmonary infection occurred in 1 case, lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in 3 cases, pulmonary embolism in 1 case, and persistent air leakage in the chest in 5 cases, all of which were improved by conservative treatment. Two cases of pleural effusion after discharge were improved after ultrasound guided drainage. Postoperative pathology showed 31 cases of minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, 6 cases of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), 3 cases of severe atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), and 2 cases of other benign nodules. All cases were lymph node-negative.

Conclusion

VATS combined with 3D-CTBA is safe and feasible in anatomical basal segmentectomy; consequently, this approach should be promoted and applied in clinical work.

Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of the Enhanced Smoking Cessation Approach to Promote Empowerment (ESCAPE) digitalized intervention to promote lung health in high-risk individuals who smoke

Low dose computed tomography (LDCT) is an effective screening test to decrease lung cancer deaths. Lung cancer screening may be a teachable moment helping people who smoke to quit, which may result in increased benefit of screening. Innovative strategies are needed to engage high-risk individuals in learning about LDCT screening. More precise methods such as polygenic risk scores quantify genetic predisposition to tobacco use, and optimize lung health interventions. We present the ESCAPE (Enhanced Smoking Cessation Approach to Promote Empowerment) protocol. This study will test a smoking cessation intervention using personal stories and a lung cancer screening decision-aide compared to standard care (brief advice, referral to a quit line, and a lung cancer screening decision-aide), examine the relationship between a polygenic risk score and smoking abstinence, and describe perceptions about integration of genomic information into smoking cessation treatment. A randomized controlled trial followed by a sequential explanatory mixed methods approach will compare the efficacy of the interventions. Interviews will add insight into the use of genomic information and risk perceptions to tailor smoking cessation treatment. Two-hundred and fifty individuals will be recruited from primary care, community-based organizations, mailing lists and through social media. Data will be collected at baseline, 1, 3 and 6-months. The primary outcomes are 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence and stage of lung cancer screening at 6-months. The results from this study will provide information to refine the ESCAPE intervention and facilitate integration of precision health into future lung health interventions. Clinical trial registration number: NCT0469129T.

Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy-guided radiofrequency identification marking in wedge resection for fluoroscopically invisible small lung lesions

OBJECTIVES

We developed a novel wireless localization technique after electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy-guided radiofrequency identification marker placement for fluoroscopically invisible small lung lesions. We conducted an observational study to investigate the feasibility of this technique and retrospectively compared 2 marking approaches with or without cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

METHODS

Consecutive patients from January 2021 to March 2022 in our institution were enrolled. Markers were placed central to the lesions either in a bronchoscopic suite under intravenous anaesthesia or a hybrid operation theatre with CBCT under general anaesthesia. The efficacy of the 2 marking methods was compared using an inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted analysis.

RESULTS

Totally 80 markers were placed (45 under CBCT and 35 under fluoroscopy) for 74 patients with 80 lesions [mean size: 6.9 mm (interquartile range: 5.1-8.4) at a median depth from the pleura of 14.0 mm (interquartile range: 8.5-19.5)]. The median distance from marker to lesion was 9.1 mm, with a pleural depth of 15.5 mm. The tumour resection rate was 97.5% (78/80) with the median surgical margin of 10.0 mm (interquartile range: 8.0-11.0). Although the bronchoscopy time was longer using CBCT because of the need for 2.8 scans per lesion, the distance from the marker to the lesion was shorter for marking using CBCT than marking using fluoroscopy (adjusted difference: -4.56, 95% confidence interval: -6.51 to -2.61, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy-guided radiofrequency identification marking provided a high tumour resection rate with sufficient surgical margins.

One-stage resection of four genotypes of bilateral multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

The incidence of multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) in China is 0.52%-2.45%. Most primary lung cancer cases have reported two lesions or three in rare cases. We report a rare case of bilateral simultaneous multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma of four different genotypes.

CASE SUMMARY

A 58-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital on June 29, 2021, and upon physical examination, four multiple pulmonary nodules were identified in both lungs. Further computed tomography (CT) images revealed the presence of ground glass nodules, predicted to be high-risk cancer lesions by artificial intelligence. With the guidance of three-dimensional reconstruction of preoperative CT images, the nodules were resected under thoracoscopy. Postoperative pathological investigation revealed that the nodule types were adenocarcinoma in situ, invasive alveolar adenocarcinoma, and microinvasive adenocarcinoma. The excised nodules were further sequenced using high-throughput sequencing (semiconductor sequencing method) of 26 lung cancer genes to confirm that the four lesions were not homologous. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 8, that is, on July 15, 2021. One month later, she returned to the hospital for follow-up and reexamination. Chest CT examination showed that she had recovered well, and no obvious exudation and effusion were found in both pleural cavities. Evaluation of postoperative pulmonary function showed that her forced vital capacity was 1.40 L (preoperative value, 2.27 L) and forced expiratory volume was 1.24 L (preoperative value, 2.23 L).

CONCLUSION

The surgical plan for multiple pulmonary nodules should be carefully considered. For carefully selected patients with concurrently occurring multiple lung nodules in both lungs, sublobectomy is a safe and feasible plan for concurrent bilateral resection of the lesions. Genetic sequencing is necessary for MPLC diagnosis and treatment.

Folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells in the preoperative diagnosis of indeterminate pulmonary nodules

BACKGROUND

The use of FR + CTC to distinguish lung cancer from benign lung disease has been well studied. However, the effective method to differentiate precursor glandular lesions from benign/malignant pulmonary diseases is rare.

METHODS

380 patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules were prospectively recruited. Peripheral blood samples were collected from all participants before surgery for analyzing FR + CTC levels. The performance of FR + CTC to identify lung precursor lesions were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

FR + CTC can effectively differentiate precursor from benign pulmonary diseases in all included patients (cutoff: 9.22 FU/3 ml, AUC = 0.807, (p < 0.0001, sensitivity: 69.17%, specificity: 82.46%) and patients with single pulmonary lesion (cutoff: 9.03 FU/3 ml, AUC = 0.842, p = 0.0001, sensitivity: 75.20%, specificity: 83.00%). However, FR + CTC cannot differentiate precursor from benign pulmonary diseases in multiple lesions patients (p = 0.110). FR + CTC neither differentiate precursor from malignant pulmonary lesions in all included patients (p = 0.715), single nor multiple lesions patients (p = 0.867, p = 0.692, respectively). Total number of pulmonary nodules, MTD, location (lower vs upper) were independent risk factors for malignancy (AOR, 95% CI: 3.104 (1.525, 6.316), 3.148 (1.722, 5.754), 2.098 (1.132, 3.888), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative FR + CTC can be identified in precursor glandular lesions and utilized to differentiate from benign pulmonary diseases. Total number of pulmonary nodules, MTD, location (lower vs upper) were independent risk factors for malignancy.

The More Extensive the Spread through Air Spaces, the Worse the Prognosis Is: Semi-Quantitative Evaluation of Spread through Air Spaces in Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas

INTRODUCTION

The extent of spread through air spaces (STAS) is less investigated among patients with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent sublobar resection. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the extent of STAS semi-quantitatively, to assess its prognostic impact on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), and to investigate the reproducibility of this assessment.

METHODS

The number of tumour cell clusters and single tumour cells within air spaces was recorded in three different most prominent areas (200x field of view). The extent of STAS was categorized into three groups, and the presence of free tumour cluster (FTC) was recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were included. Recurrence was more frequent with higher grade (p = 0.003), presence of lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.027), and presence of STAS of any extent (p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, presence of FTC (HR: 5.89; 95% CI: 1.63-21.26; p = 0.005) and more pronounced STAS (HR: 7.46; 95% CI: 1.60-34.6; p = 0.01) had adverse impact on OS and RFS, respectively. Concerning reproducibility, excellent agreement was found among STAS parameters (ICC range: 0.92-0.94).

DISCUSSION

More extensive STAS is an unfavourable prognostic factor in adenocarcinomas treated with sublobar resection. As the evaluation of extent of STAS is reproducible, further investigation is required to gather more evidence.

Survival after wedge resection versus lobectomy for stage IA second primary NSCLC with previous lung cancer-directed surgery

Background

The surgical procedure for early-stage second primary non-small cell lung cancer (SP-NSCLC) remains controversial, especially for patients with previous lung cancer-directed surgery. This study aims to compare the survival after wedge resection and lobectomy for these patients.

Methods

Stage IA SP-NSCLC patients with clear clinical information were searched from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Cox proportional hazard model, the competing risk model, and the Kaplan–Meier survival curve were used to describe the survival difference between wedge resection and lobectomy. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) method was also performed to reduce the potential impact of confounding factors between the two groups.

Results

Of the 320 eligible stage IA SP-NSCLC patients included in this study, 238 (74.4%) patients underwent wedge resection and 82 (25.6%) patients received lobectomy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 61.3% with wedge resection and was 66.1% with lobectomy. Both before and after PSM, wedge resection showed similar OS and lung cancer-specific mortality as lobectomy in the entire cohort. Additionally, in all subgroup analyses, wedge resection demonstrated equivalent survival to lobectomy. However, in the female, sublobectomy for the first primary lung cancer, and interval ≤ 24 months subgroups, wedge resection displayed a higher lung cancer-specific mortality than lobectomy (fine-gray test, all p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Overall, wedge resection is comparable to lobectomy in OS for stage IA SP-NSCLC patients with previous lung cancer-directed surgery. Therefore, we believe that wedge resection may be sufficient for these patients, although, in some cases, wedge resection has a higher lung cancer-specific mortality rate than lobectomy.

Deep Learning Analysis Using 18F-FDG PET/CT to Predict Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Clinical N0 Lung Adenocarcinoma

Introduction

The aim of this work was to determine the feasibility of using a deep learning approach to predict occult lymph node metastasis (OLM) based on preoperative FDG-PET/CT images in patients with clinical node-negative (cN0) lung adenocarcinoma.

Materials and Methods

Dataset 1 (for training and internal validation) included 376 consecutive patients with cN0 lung adenocarcinoma from our hospital between May 2012 and May 2021. Dataset 2 (for prospective test) used 58 consecutive patients with cN0 lung adenocarcinoma from June 2021 to February 2022 at the same center. Three deep learning models: PET alone, CT alone, and combined model, were developed for the prediction of OLM. The performance of the models was evaluated on internal validation and prospective test in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs).

Results

The combined model incorporating PET and CT showed the best performance, achieved an AUC of 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61, 1.00] in the prediction of OLM in internal validation set (n = 60) and an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.99) in the prospective test set (n = 58). The model achieved 87.50% sensitivity, 80.00% specificity, and 81.00% accuracy in the internal validation set and achieved 75.00% sensitivity, 88.46% specificity, and 86.60% accuracy in the prospective test set.

Conclusion

This study presented a deep learning approach to enable the prediction of occult nodal involvement based on the PET/CT images before surgery in cN0 lung adenocarcinoma, which would help clinicians select patients who would be suitable for sublobar resection.

Correlation of computed tomography quantitative parameters with tumor invasion and Ki-67 expression in early lung adenocarcinoma

The purpose of the study is to investigate the correlation of computed tomography (CT) quantitative parameters with tumor invasion and Ki-67 expression in early lung adenocarcinoma.The study involved 141 lesions in 141 patients with early lung adenocarcinoma. According to the degree of tumor invasion, the lesions were assigned into (adenocarcinoma in situ + minimally invasive adenocarcinoma) group and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) group. Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic software was used to automatically outline the lesions and extract corresponding quantitative parameters on CT images. Statistical analysis was performed to explore the correlation of these parameters with tumor invasion and Ki-67 expression.The results of logistic regression analysis showed that the short diameter of the lesion and the average CT value were independent predictors of IAC. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified the average CT value as an independent predictor of IAC with the best performance, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.893 (P < .001), and the threshold of -450 HU. Besides, the predicted probability of logistic regression analysis model was detected to have the area under the curve of 0.931 (P < .001). The results of Spearman correlation analysis showed that the expression level of Ki-67 had the highest correlation with the average CT value of the lesion (r = 0.403, P < .001).The short diameter of the lesion and the average CT value are independent predictors of IAC, and the average CT value is significantly positively correlated with the expression of tumor Ki-67.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 3: systematic review of evidence regarding surgery in compromised patients or specific tumors

Background

Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options [lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), thermal ablation], weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making.

Methods

A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection in older patients, patients with limited pulmonary reserve and favorable tumors is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons (NRCs) with adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved.

Results

In older patients, perioperative mortality is minimally altered by resection extent and only slightly affected by increasing age; sublobar resection may slightly decrease morbidity. Long-term outcomes are worse after lesser resection; the difference is slightly attenuated with increasing age. Reported short-term outcomes are quite acceptable in (selected) patients with severely limited pulmonary reserve, not clearly altered by resection extent but substantially improved by a minimally invasive approach. Quality-of-life (QOL) and impact on pulmonary function hasn't been well studied, but there appears to be little difference by resection extent in older or compromised patients. Patient selection is paramount but not well defined. Ground-glass and screen-detected tumors exhibit favorable long-term outcomes regardless of resection extent; however solid tumors <1 cm are not a reliably favorable group.

Conclusions

A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding resection extent in compromised patients and favorable tumors with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation for a framework for individualized decision-making.

Combination of mean CT value and maximum CT value as a novel predictor of lepidic predominant lesions in small lung adenocarcinoma presenting as solid nodules

Lung adenocarcinomas presenting as solid nodules are occasionally diagnosed as lepidic predominant lesions. The aim of this study was to clarify the histological structure and to identify factors predictive of lepidic predominant lesions. We retrospectively reviewed 38 patients that underwent lobectomy for small (≤ 2 cm) adenocarcinoma presenting as solid nodules. Resected tumor slides were reviewed and histological components were evaluated. Clinical and radiological data were analyzed to identify factors predictive of lepidic predominant lesions. Of 38 solid nodules, 9 (23.7%) nodules were lepidic predominant lesions. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 100% for lepidic predominant lesions (n = 9) and 74.6% for non-lepidic predominant lesions (n = 29). Mean CT values (p = 0.039) and maximum CT values (p = 0.015) were significantly lower in lepidic predominant lesions compared with non-lepidic predominant lesions. For the prediction of lepidic predominant lesions, the sensitivity and specificity of mean CT value (cutoff, - 150 HU) were 77.8% and 82.8%, respectively, and those of maximum CT value (cutoff, 320 HU) were 77.8% and 72.4%, respectively. A combination of mean and maximum CT values (cutoffs of - 150 HU and 380 HU for mean CT value and maximum CT value, respectively) more accurately predicted lepidic predominant lesions, with a sensitivity and specificity of 77.8% and 86.2%, respectively. The prognosis of lepidic predominant lesions was excellent, even for solid nodules. The combined use of mean and maximum CT values was useful for predicting lepidic predominant lesions, and may help predict prognosis.

Survival After Lobectomy vs. Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: A Population-Based Study

Objective

Due to the low incidence of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), the survival analysis for comparing lobectomy and sublobar resection (SLR) for stage IA LCNEC remains scarce.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with pathological stage IA LCNEC between 1998 and 2016 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The oncological outcomes were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox multivariate analysis were used to identify the independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS. Furthermore, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between SLR and lobectomy to adjust the confounding factors.

Results

A total of 308 patients with stage IA LCNEC met the inclusion criteria: 229 patients (74.4%) received lobectomy and 79 patients (25.6%) received SLR. Patients who underwent SLR were older (P < 0.001), had smaller tumor size (P = 0.010), and less lymph nodes dissection (P < 0.001). The 5-year CSS and OS rates were 56.5 and 42.9% for SLR, and 67.8 and 55.7% for lobectomy, respectively (P = 0.037 and 0.019, respectively). However, multivariate analysis did not identify any differences between the SLR group and lobectomy group in CSS (P = 0.135) and OS (P = 0.285); and the PSM also supported these results. In addition, the age at diagnosis and laterality of tumor were identified as significant predictors for CSS and OS, whereas the number of lymph nodes dissection was a significant predictor for CSS.

Conclusions

Although SLR is not inferior to lobectomy in terms of oncological outcomes for patients with stage IA LCNEC, more lymph nodes can be dissected or sampled during lobectomy. Lobectomy should still be considered as a standard procedure for patients with early-stage LCNEC who are able to withstand lobectomy.

Comparison Between Wedge Resection and Lobectomy/Segmentectomy for Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Bayesian Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Surgery has become an accepted method for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this Bayesian meta-analysis was to compare the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) between wedge resection and lobectomy/segmentectomy for treatment of early-stage NSCLC.

METHODS

Eligible studies were retrieved from Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CNKI, and WanFang up to July 2021 and screened based on established selection criteria. The Bayesian meta-analysis was performed with the combination of the reported survival outcomes of the individual studies using a random-effect model. The OS, DFS, and RFS of the wedge resection group was compared with the lobectomy/segmentectomy group. The hazard ratio (HR) and standard error were extracted or calculated for each study using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

This study was registered with PROSPERO (INPLASY202080090).The pooled OS hazard ratio between segmentectomy and lobectomy was 1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.4], the pooled HR between lobectomy and wedge resection was 0.71 [95% CI 0.52-0.96], and the pooled HR between segmentectomy and wedge was 0.80 [95% CI 0.56-1.10]. The pooled HR of DFS or RFS was not statistically significant among the three surgical approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with early-stage NSCLC received lobectomy had the lowest hazard ratio of OS than patients received wedge resection, indicating that the overall survival of patients received lobectomy was higher than patients received wedge resection. However, regarding DFS and RFS, the three surgical approaches showed no significant difference.

Quantifying invasiveness of clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with computed tomography texture features

OBJECTIVES

The study objectives were to establish and validate a nomogram for pathological invasiveness prediction in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma and to help identify those potentially unsuitable for sublobar resection-based computed tomography texture features.

METHOD

Patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between January 2015 and October 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All surgically resected nodules were pathologically classified into less-invasive and invasive cohorts. Each nodule was manually segmented, and its computerized texture features were extracted. Clinicopathological and computed tomographic texture features were compared between 2 cohorts. A nomogram for distinguishing the pathological invasiveness was established and validated.

RESULTS

Among 428 enrolled patients, 249 were diagnosed with invasive pathological subtypes. Smoking status (odds ratio, 2.906; 95% confidence interval, 1.285-6.579; P = .011), mean computed tomography attenuation value (odds ratio, 1.005, 95% confidence interval, 1.002-1.007; P < .001), and entropy (odds ratio, 8.536, 95% confidence interval, 3.478-20.951; P < .001) were identified as independent predictors for pathological invasiveness by multivariate logistics regression analysis. The nomogram showed good calibration (P = .182) with an area under the curve of 0.849 when validated with testing set data. Decision curve analysis indicated the potentially clinical usefulness of the model with respect to treat-all or treat-none scenario. Compared with intraoperative frozen-section, the nomogram performed better in pathological invasiveness diagnosis (area under the curve, 0.815 vs 0.670; P = .00095).

CONCLUSIONS

We established and validated a nomogram to compute the probability of invasiveness of clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with great calibration, which may contribute to decisions related to resection extent.

Current Surgical Indications for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

The management strategy for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been transformed by our improved understanding of the cancer biology and concomitant development of novel systemic therapies. Complete surgical resection of NSCLC continues to offer the best chance for cure or local and regional disease control, and with improvements in minimally invasive techniques and enhanced recovery, the morbidity associated with surgical resection has been reduced. Patient-centered multi-disciplinary discussions that consider surgical therapy are associated with improved outcomes. Provided with promising novel therapeutic modalities including immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without chemotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and targeted systemic therapies, indications for surgery continue to evolve and have expanded to include selected patients with advanced and metastatic disease.

Abstract

With recent strides made within the field of thoracic oncology, the management of NSCLC is evolving rapidly. Careful patient selection and timing of multi-modality therapy to permit the optimization of therapeutic benefit must be pursued. While chemotherapy and radiotherapy continue to have a role in the management of lung cancer, surgical therapy remains an essential component of lung cancer treatment in early, locally and regionally advanced, as well as in selected, cases of metastatic disease. Recent and most impactful advances in the treatment of lung cancer relate to the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapy, molecular profiling, and predictive biomarker discovery. Many of these systemic therapies are a part of the standard of care in metastatic NSCLC, and their indications are expanding towards surgically operable lung cancer to improve survival outcomes. Numerous completed and ongoing clinical trials in the surgically operable NSCLC speak to the interest and importance of the multi-modality therapy even in earlier stages of NSCLC. In this review, we focus on the current standard of care indications for surgical therapy in stage I-IV NSCLC as well as on the anticipated future direction of multi-disciplinary lung cancer therapy.

Extent of Resection Influences Survival in Early-Stage Lung Cancer with Occult Nodal Disease

BACKGROUND

Minimal literature exists evaluating the impact of the extent of resection on survival in patients with small, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) found to have occult nodal disease (OND). We hypothesized that sublobar resection has comparable overall survival to patients undergoing lobectomy for clinical Stage IA NSCLC that harbors OND.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was reviewed for identification of patients with clinical Stage IA NSCLC who underwent wedge resection, segmentectomy or lobectomy and were found to have OND. Overall survival was compared between groups and a multivariate Cox-Regression model identified factors associated with worse survival.

RESULTS

OND occurred in 6.1% of all patients with clinical Stage IA disease undergoing resection. Patients undergoing wedge resection and segmentectomy found to have OND were older (67.6 ± 9.6 vs. 66.1 ± 9.3 vs. 65.6 ± 9.5, p=0.004), and had more advanced pathologic stage (pStage III: 68.7% vs. 50.5% vs. 41.5%, p<0.001) than those receiving lobectomy. There was no difference in the median overall survival between segmentectomy and lobectomy (68.5 months vs. 57.6, p=0.200.) However, wedge resection was independently associated with worse overall survival when controlling for other preoperative variables, hazard ratio: 1.23 (1.01 - 1.51), p=0.042.

CONCLUSIONS

Review of the National Cancer Database suggests that there is no improvement in overall survival in patients undergoing lobectomy versus segmentectomy in carefully selected patients with clinical Stage IA NSCLC harboring occult nodal disease. However, those undergoing wedge resection may have worse overall survival than those undergoing both lobectomy and segmentectomy.

Bibliometric Analysis of 50 Most Cited Articles Comparing Lobectomy with Sublobar Resection

BACKGROUND

 Recent years have seen an increase in the number of studies of the sublobar resection approach in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery. The purpose of this bibliometric analysis is to assess the significance and impact of articles comparing sublobar resection and lobectomy in NSCLC surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 The Web of Science database was searched to identify studies comparing sublobar resection and lobectomy in NSCLC surgery published between 2005 and 2020 (accessed: September 11, 2020). The 50 most cited articles were analyzed by years, countries, authors, authors' affiliations, journals, journals' addresses, and impact factors.

RESULTS

 The bibliometric analysis revealed that the most cited article had 443 citations, while the total number of citations of all articles was 2,820. The mean number of citations, in turn, was 56.4 ± 75.62 (1-443) times. The highest number of publications over the past 15 years was in 2016, with eight articles. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (n = 10; 20%) had the highest number of publications on the list. The articles included in the present study were mostly (n = 35, 70%) published in U.S. journals. While multiple subject matters and analyses were presented by many studies, survival was the topic of greatest interest, with 37 (74%) studies.

CONCLUSION

 This study revealed that interest in studies comparing sublobar resection with lobectomy has increased in recent years. It also presents both quantitative and qualitative analyses of the most cited articles in the literature on this topic. Therefore, it can serve as a guide for researchers.

Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Versus Sublobar Resection for pStage I Geriatric Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objectives

The choice of resection method for geriatric patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains contentious. This study aimed to evaluate survival and perioperative outcomes after thoracoscopic lobectomy resection (LR) or sublobar resection (SR) in patients aged ≥75 years with pathologic stage (pStage) I NSCLC.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively examined 258 consecutive patients aged ≥75 years with pStage I NSCLC who underwent thoracoscopic tumor resection at our institute from 2011 to 2018. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis identified 60 patients in each group for comparison of survival-related parameters, including disease-free survival (DFS), lung cancer-specific overall survival (OS), and non-lung cancer-specific OS, using the Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

LR and SR were performed in 84 (32.6%) and 174 (67.4%) patients aged ≥75 years, respectively. The LR group had younger patients, better performance status, larger tumor sizes, and deeper tumor location than the SR group. Multivariate studies showed that the resection method was not a prognostic factor for OS. The two PSM-matched groups were not significantly different with respect to lung cancer-specific OS (p = 0.116), non-lung cancer-specific OS (p = 0.408), and DFS (p = 0.597). SR helped achieve better perioperative outcomes than LR, including fewer postoperative complications (10.0% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.011), shorter operative times (p < 0.001), decreased blood loss (p = 0.026), and shorter chest tube duration (p = 0.010) and hospital stays (p = 0.035).

Conclusions

Thoracoscopic SR may provide similar oncological outcomes to LR, but may be a safer and more feasible surgical method for geriatric patients with pStage I NSCLC.

Identification of pathological subtypes of early lung adenocarcinoma based on artificial intelligence parameters and CT signs

Objective: To explore the value of quantitative parameters of artificial intelligence (AI) and computed tomography (CT) signs in identifying pathological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma appearing as ground-glass nodules (GGNs). Methods: CT images of 224 GGNs from 210 individuals were collected retrospectively and classified into atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH)/adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) groups. AI was used to identify GGNs and to obtain quantitative parameters, and CT signs were recognized manually. The mixed predictive model based on logistic multivariate regression was built and evaluated. Results: Of the 224 GGNs, 55, 93, and 76 were AAH/AIS, MIA, and IAC, respectively. In terms of AI parameters, from AAH/AIS to MIA, and IAC, there was a gradual increase in two-dimensional mean diameter, three-dimensional mean diameter, mean CT value, maximum CT value, and volume of GGNs (all P<0.0001). Except for the CT signs of the location, and the tumor–lung interface, there were significant differences among the three groups in the density, shape, vacuolar signs, air bronchogram, lobulation, spiculation, pleural indentation, and vascular convergence signs (all P<0.05). The areas under the curve (AUC) of predictive model 1 for identifying the AAH/AIS and MIA and model 2 for identifying MIA and IAC were 0.779 and 0.918, respectively, which were greater than the quantitative parameters independently (all P<0.05). Conclusion: AI parameters are valuable for identifying subtypes of early lung adenocarcinoma and have improved diagnostic efficacy when combined with CT signs.