What is a “good” result after transcatheter mitral repair? Impact of 2+ residual mitral regurgitation

Prognostic impact of vasopressor test in transcatheter edge-to-edge repair of secondary mitral regurgitation: The PETIT study

BACKGROUND

Vasopressor test (VPT) might be useful in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular dysfunction (MITRA-FR-like patients) during transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER).

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of VPT.

METHODS

MR treated with TEER were included in a multicenter prospective registry. VPT was used intraprocedurally in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and/or hypotension. The 1-year echocardiographic and clinical outcomes were compared according to the use of VPT. The primary endpoint was a combination of mortality + heart failure (HF) readmission at 1-year.

RESULTS

A total of 1115 patients were included, mean age was 72.8 ± 10.5 years and 30.4% were women. VPT was performed in 128 subjects (11.5%), more often in critically ill patients with biventricular dysfunction. Postprocedurally the VPT group had greater rate of MR ≥ 2+ (46.9% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.003) despite greater number of devices (≥2 clips, 52% vs. 40.6 p = 0.008) and device repositioning or new clip in 12.5%. At 1-year, the primary endpoint occurred more often in the VPT group (27.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.002) as well as all-cause mortality (21.9% vs. 8.1%, p ≤ 0.001) but no differences existed in HF readmission rate (14.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.610), cardiovascular mortality (4.4% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.713) or residual MR ≥ 2+ (51.1% vs 51.7%, p = 0.371).

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic evaluation of MR during TEER procedure through VPT was performed in patients with worse baseline risk who also presented higher all-cause mortality at 1-year follow-up. However, 1-year residual MR, cardiovascular mortality and HF readmission rate remained comparable suggesting that VPT might help in the management of MITRA-FR-like patients.

Early Outcomes of Two Large Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Devices-A Propensity Score Matched Multicenter Comparison

Background/Objectives: Previous trials reported comparable results with PASCAL and earlier MitraClip generations. Limited comparative data exist for more contemporary MitraClip generations, particularly the large MitraClip XT(R/W). We aimed to evaluate acute and 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) with one of the large devices, either PASCAL P10 or MitraClip XT(R/W) (3rd/4th generation). Methods: A total of 309 PASCAL-treated patients were matched by propensity score to 253 MitraClip-treated patients, resulting in 200 adequately balanced pairs. Procedural, clinical, and echocardiographic outcomes were collected for up to 30 days, including subgroup analysis for mitral regurgitation (MR) etiologies. Results: PASCAL and MitraClip patients were comparable regarding age (80 vs. 79 years), sex (female: 45.5% vs. 50.5%), and MR etiology (degenerative MR: n = 94, functional MR [FMR]: n = 96, mixed MR: n = 10 in each group). Technical success rates were comparable (96.5% vs. 96.0%; p > 0.999). At discharge, the mean gradient was higher (3.3 mmHg vs. 3.0 mmHg; p = 0.038), and the residual mitral valve orifice area was smaller in MitraClip patients (3.0 cm2 vs. 2.3 cm2; p < 0.001). At discharge, the reduction to MR ≤ 2+ was comparable (92.4% vs. 87.8%; p = 0.132). However, reduction to MR ≤ 1+ was more frequently observed in PASCAL patients (67.7% vs. 56.6%; p = 0.029), driven by the FMR subgroup (74.0% vs. 60.0%; p = 0.046). No difference was observed in 30-day mortality (p = 0.204) or reduction in NYHA-FC to ≤II (p > 0.999). Conclusions: Both M-TEER devices exhibited high and comparable rates of technical success and MR reduction to ≤2+. PASCAL may be advantageous in achieving MR reduction to ≤1+ in patients with FMR.

Impact of heart failure hospitalizations on clinical outcomes after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: Results from the EXPAND study

AIM

This analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes associated with heart failure (HF) readmissions and to identify associations with HF hospitalizations (HFH) in patients treated with the MitraClip™ NTR/XTR System in the EXPAND study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The global, real-world EXPAND study enrolled 1041 patients with primary or secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) treated with the MitraClip NTR/XTR System. Echocardiograms were analysed by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory. The study population was stratified into HFH and No-HFH groups based on the occurrence of HFH 1 year post-index procedure. Clinical outcomes including MR severity, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score, and all-cause mortality were compared (HFH: n = 181; No-HFH: n = 860). Both groups achieved consistent 1-year MR reduction to ≤1+ (HFH vs. No-HFH: 87.3% vs. 89.5%, p = 0.6) and significant 1-year improvement in KCCQ scores (+16.5 vs. +22.3, p = 0.09) and NYHA functional class. However, more patients in the No-HFH group had 1-year NYHA class ≤II (HFH vs. No-HFH: 67.9% vs. 81.9%, p < 0.01). All-cause mortality at 1 year was 36.8% in the HFH group versus 10.4% in the No-HFH group (p < 0.001). The HFH rate decreased by 63% at 1 year post-M-TEER versus 1 year pre-treatment (relative risk 0.4, p < 0.001). Independent HFH associations were MR ≥2+ at discharge, HFH 1 year prior to treatment, baseline NYHA class ≥III, baseline tricuspid regurgitation ≥2+, and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports the impact of HFH on clinical outcomes post-treatment in the EXPAND study. Results demonstrate that the occurrence of HFH was associated with worse 1-year survival, and treatment with the MitraClip system substantially reduced HFH and improved patient symptoms and quality of life.

Association between echocardiographic velocity time integral ratio of mitral valve and left ventricular outflow tract and clinical outcomes post transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

Background

Residual mitral regurgitation (MR) is frequent after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). There is controversy regarding the clinical impact of residual MR and its quantitative assessment by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), which is often challenging with multiple eccentric jets and artifact from the clip. The utility of the velocity time integral (VTI) ratio between the mitral valve (MV) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), (VTIMV/LVOT), a simple Doppler measurement that increases with MR, has not been assessed post TEER.

Methods

Baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and TTE data from patients who underwent TEER between 2014 and 2021 across three academic centers were retrospectively analyzed. Post-procedure TTEs were evaluated for VTIMV/LVOT in the first three months after TEER. One-year outcomes including all-cause and cardiac mortality, major adverse cardiac events, and MV reintervention were compared between patients with high VTIMV/LVOT (≥2.5) and low (<2.5).

Results

In total, 372 patients were included (mean age 78.7 ± 8.8 years, 68 % male, mean pre-TEER ejection fraction of 50.5 ± 14.7 %). Follow up TTEs were performed at a median of 37.5 (IQR 30-48) days post-procedure. Patients with high VTIMV/LVOT had significantly higher all-cause mortality (HR 2.10, p = 0.003), cardiac mortality (HR 3.03, p = 0.004) and heart failure admissions (HR 2.28, p < 0.001) at one-year post-procedure. There was no association between raised VTIMV/LVOT and subsequent MV reintervention.

Conclusion

High VTIMV/LVOT has clinically significant prognostic value at one year post TEER. This tool could be used to select patients for consideration of repeat intervention.

Safety and efficacy of the DragonFly system for transcatheter valve repair of degenerative mitral regurgitation: one-year results of the DRAGONFLY-DMR trial

BACKGROUND

Severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) can cause a poor prognosis if left untreated. For patients considered at prohibitive surgical risk, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has become an accepted alternative therapy. The DragonFly transcatheter valve repair system is an innovative evolution of the mitral TEER device family to treat DMR.

AIMS

Herein we report on the DRAGONFLY-DMR trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04734756), which was a prospective, single-arm, multicentre study on the safety and effectiveness of the DragonFly system.

METHODS

A total of 120 eligible patients with prohibitive surgical risk and DMR ≥3+ were screened by a central eligibility committee for enrolment. The study utilised an independent echocardiography core laboratory and clinical event committee. The primary endpoint was the clinical success rate, which measured freedom from all-cause mortality, mitral valve reintervention, and mitral regurgitation (MR) >2+ at 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

At 1 year, the trial successfully achieved its prespecified primary efficacy endpoint, with a clinical success rate of 87.5% (95% confidence interval: 80.1-92.3%). The rates of major adverse events, all-cause mortality, mitral valve reintervention, and heart failure hospitalisation were 9.0%, 5.0%, 0.8%, and 3.4%, respectively. MR ≤2+ was 90.4% at 1 month and 92.0% at 1 year. Over time, left ventricular reverse remodelling was observed (p<0.05), along with significant improvements in the patients' functional and quality-of-life outcomes, shown by an increase in the New York Heart Association Class I/II from 32.4% at baseline to 93.6% at 12 months (p<0.001) and increased Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score of 31.1±18.2 from baseline to 12 months (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The DRAGONFLY-DMR trial contributes to increasing evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of TEER therapy, specifically the DragonFly system, for treating patients with chronic symptomatic DMR 3+ to 4+ at prohibitive surgical risk.

Prognosis of Elevated Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Elevation in mitral valve pressure gradient (MVPG) after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is common, however, evidence on its prognosis is scarce and debatable. Thus, this study aims to investigate the impact of increased MVPG after M-TEER on outcomes. Studies reporting the associations between the elevated MVPG after M-TEER and outcomes were identified in a systematic search of published literatures. Associations were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Seven observational studies with 2,730 patients (mean age, 77.7 ± 9.3 years; male, 64.4%; functional mitral regurgitation [MR], 65.2%) were eligible for the present analysis. M-TEER was performed entirely using the MitraClip system (Abbott), followed by 29.7% of patients having increased MVPG. Elevated postprocedural MVPG was not associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome, compared to low MVPG [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-1.58; p = 0.12; I2 = 53.5%). However, the prognosis of elevated MVPG was observed in degenerative MR patients (HR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.03-1.84; p = 0.03; I2 = 0%), whereas not in functional MR patients. Patients with low MVPG + high residual MR had a higher risk of the primary outcome than those with high MVPG + low residual MR after M-TEER (HR = 1.50; 95% CI 1.10-2.03; p = 0.01; I2 = 13%). In conclusion, elevated MVPG seems to predict adverse outcomes mainly in patients with degenerative MR. Future studies are needed to prove these findings.

A Comparative Study of 1-Year Postprocedural Outcomes in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Advanced Primary Mitral Regurgitation: PASCAL vs. MitraClip

Both the MitraClip and PASCAL systems offer transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) solutions for mitral regurgitation. Evidence indicates a lower technical success rate for TEER in complex degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) cases. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge therapy for primary mitral regurgitation with advanced anatomy, defined as mitral regurgitation effective regurgitant orifice area (MR-EROA) ≥0.40 cm2 or large flail gap (≥5 mm) or width (≥7 mm) or Barlow's disease, that completed follow-up after 1 year. Our criteria were met by 27 patients treated with PASCAL and 18 with MitraClip. All patients exhibited a significant, equivalent short-term reduction in MR-EROA, mitral regurgitation vena contracta diameter (MR-VCD), regurgitant volume, and clinical status. At 1 year follow-up, reductions in MR-VCD, regurgitant volume, and MR-EROA remained significant for both groups without significant differences between groups. MR-Grade ≤ 1+ was achieved in 18 (66.7%) and 10 (55.6%) patients, respectively. At follow-up, no difference in hospitalization for cardiac decompensation was observed. Overall death was similar in both groups. Our study suggests that both the PASCAL and MitraClip systems significantly reduce mitral regurgitation even in advanced degenerative diseases. Within our limited data, we found no evidence of inferior performance of the PASCAL system.

Mitral valve leaflet stiffness predicts residual mitral regurgitation after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

BACKGROUND

Residual regurgitation after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVR) is a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). This study sought to identify the mitral valve (MV) parameters measured by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) and MV leaflet features that predict residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after TMVR in patients with FMR.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with FMR who underwent TMVR were classified into two groups based on the degree of residual MR just after TMVR: < 2+ in the optimal MR reduction group and ≥ 2+ in the suboptimal MR reduction group. The two groups were compared with respect to 3D-TEE parameters and the MV leaflet features, including the following parameters: stiffness, defined as a leaflet that remains at a fixed angle even during diastole, and thickness, measured in both clear and rough zones.

RESULTS

Thirty-four of 46 patients (74%) were classified as the optimal MR reduction group. Multivariable analysis showed that anterior mitral leaflet + posterior mitral leaflet length/anteroposterior annulus diameter (p = .044) and MV leaflet stiffness (p = .007) were independent predictors of residual MR.

CONCLUSION

MV leaflet stiffness and the ratio of MV leaflet lengths to the annulus diameter may be good predictors of residual MR after TMVR in patients with FMR.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in mitral regurgitation: A comparison of device systems and recommendations for tailored device selection. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is a minimally invasive method for the treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with prohibitive surgical risks. The traditionally used device, MitraClip, showed both safety and effectiveness in M-TEER. PASCAL is a newer device that has emerged as another feasible option to be used in this procedure.

METHODS

We searched for observational studies that compared PASCAL to MitraClip devices in M-TEER. The electronic databases searched for relevant studies were PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase. The primary outcomes were technical success and the grade of MR at follow-up. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, bleeding, device success and reintervention.

RESULTS

Technical success (PASCAL: 96.5% vs MitraClip: 97.6%, p = 0.24) and MR ≤ 2 at 30-day follow-up (PASCAL: 89.4vs MitraClip 89.9%, p = 0.51) were comparable between both groups. Both devices showed similar outcomes including all-cause mortality (RR: 0.68 [0.34, 1.38]; P = 0.28), major bleeding (RR: 1.87 [0.68, 5.10]; P = 0.22) and reintervention (RR: 1.02 [0.33, 3.16]; P = 0.97). Device success was more frequent with PASCAL device (PASCAL: 86% vs MitraClip 68.5%; P = 0.44), however, the results did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcomes of PASCAL were comparable to those of MitraClip with no significant difference in safety and effectiveness. The choice between MitraClip and PASCAL devices should be guided by various factors, including mitral valve anatomy, etiology of regurgitation, and device-specific characteristics.

One-Year Outcomes and Their Relationship to Residual Mitral Regurgitation After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair With MitraClip Device: Insights From the OCEAN-Mitral Registry

Background Limited data are available about clinical outcomes and residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in the large Asian-Pacific cohort. Methods and Results From the Optimized Catheter Valvular Intervention (OCEAN-Mitral) registry, a total of 2150 patients (primary cause of 34.6%) undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair were analyzed and classified into 3 groups according to the residual MR severity at discharge: MR 0+/1+, 2+, and 3+/4+. The mortality and heart failure hospitalization rates at 1 year were 12.3% and 15.0%, respectively. Both MR and symptomatic improvement were sustained at 1 year with MR ≤2+ in 94.1% of patients and New York Heart Association functional class I/II in 95.0% of patients. Compared with residual MR 0+/1+ (20.4%) at discharge, both residual MR 2+ (30.2%; P < 0.001) and 3+/4+ (32.4%; P = 0.007) were associated with the higher incidence of death or heart failure hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.59; P < 0.001, and adjusted HR, 1.73; P = 0.008). New York Heart Association class III/IV at 1 year was more common in the MR 3+/4+ group (20.0%) than in the MR 0+/1+ (4.6%; P < 0.001) and MR 2+ (6.4%; P < 0.001) groups, and the proportion of New York Heart Association class I is significantly higher in the MR 1+ group (57.8%) than in the MR 2+ group (48.3%; P = 0.02). Conclusions The OCEAN-Mitral registry demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes and sustained MR reduction at 1 year in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. Both residual MR 2+ and 3+/4+ after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair at discharge were associated with worse clinical outcomes compared with residual MR 0+/1+. Registration Information https://upload.umin.ac.jp. Identifier: UMIN000023653.

Three-year outcomes for transcatheter repair in patients with mitral regurgitation from the CLASP study

BACKGROUND

Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is an effective option for treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR). We previously reported favorable 2-year outcomes for the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system.

OBJECTIVES

We report 3-year outcomes from the multinational, prospective, single-arm CLASP study with analysis by functional MR (FMR) and degenerative MR (DMR).

METHODS

Patients with core-lab determined MR ≥ 3+ were deemed candidates for M-TEER by the local heart team. Major adverse events were assessed by an independent clinical events committee to 1 year and by sites thereafter. Echocardiographic outcomes were evaluated by the core laboratory to 3 years.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 124 patients, 69% FMR; 31% DMR (60% NYHA class III-IVa, 100% MR ≥ 3+). The 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for survival was 75% (66% FMR; 92% DMR) and freedom from heart failure hospitalization (HFH) was 73% (64% FMR; 91% DMR), with 85% reduction in annualized HFH rate (81% FMR; 96% DMR) (p < 0.001). MR ≤ 2+ was achieved and maintained in 93% of patients (93% FMR; 94% DMR) and MR ≤ 1+ in 70% of patients (71% FMR; 67% DMR) (p < 0.001). The mean left ventricular end-diastolic volume (181 mL at baseline) decreased progressively by 28 mL [p < 0.001]. NYHA class I/II was achieved in 89% of patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-year results from the CLASP study demonstrated favorable and durable outcomes with the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system in patients with clinically significant MR. These results add to the growing body of evidence establishing the PASCAL system as a valuable therapy for patients with significant symptomatic MR.

Randomized Comparison of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation in Prohibitive Surgical Risk Patients

BACKGROUND

Severe symptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) has a poor prognosis in the absence of treatment, and new transcatheter options are emerging.

OBJECTIVES

The CLASP IID (Edwards PASCAL Transcatheter Valve Repair System Pivotal Clinical Trial) randomized trial (NCT03706833) is the first to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the PASCAL system compared with the MitraClip system in patients with significant symptomatic DMR. This report presents the primary safety and effectiveness endpoints for the trial.

METHODS

Patients with 3+ or 4+ DMR at prohibitive surgical risk were assessed by a central screening committee and randomized 2:1 (PASCAL:MitraClip). Study oversight also included an echocardiography core laboratory and a clinical events committee. The primary safety endpoint was the composite major adverse event rate at 30 days. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the proportion of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) ≤2+ at 6 months.

RESULTS

A prespecified interim analysis in 180 patients demonstrated noninferiority of the PASCAL system vs the MitraClip system for the primary safety and effectiveness endpoints of major adverse event rate (3.4% vs 4.8%) and MR ≤2+ (96.5% vs 96.8%), respectively. Functional and quality-of-life outcomes significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.05). The proportion of patients with MR ≤1+ was durable in the PASCAL group from discharge to 6 months (PASCAL, 87.2% and 83.7% [P = 0.317 vs discharge]; MitraClip, 88.5% and 71.2% [P = 0.003 vs discharge]).

CONCLUSIONS

The CLASP IID trial demonstrated safety and effectiveness of the PASCAL system and met noninferiority endpoints, expanding transcatheter treatment options for prohibitive surgical risk patients with significant symptomatic DMR.

Were they inoperable? Really?

The MitraClip technique has been increasingly used for correction of mitral valve regurgitation in patients in whom surgical mitral repair is considered contraindicated or very risky, but off label use occurs often. Failure of the procedure, translated into moderate to severe rates of residual or recurrent mitral regurgitation, is observed in up to one-third of the patients, and surgery has been used to correct it in a number of cases, in what can be called an "operation for the inoperable." That is precisely the subtitle of a paper published in this issue of the JOCS by Gerfen and colleagues, who analyse their institutional experience with a series of 17 patients. In this Editorial, I comment on this series and the possible reasons for failure of the MitraClip, and on the indications for reintervention and its constraints, which I hope can contribute to the discussion about "further exploration and refinement of patient selection criteria and identify predictors for MitraClip failure," as the authors suggest.

Echocardiographic Predictors of Suboptimal Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation

Background

Residual mitral regurgitation (MR) following mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is associated with worse outcomes. This study sought to identify echocardiographic predictors of suboptimal residual MR after TEER in patients with secondary MR.

Methods

In this retrospective single-center study, we identified all patients with secondary MR who underwent TEER between 2016 and 2021. Pre- and intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiographic images were reviewed. The primary outcome was suboptimal residual MR, defined as ≥2+ residual MR on postprocedural transesophageal echocardiography. The association of preprocedural echocardiographic parameters with the primary outcome was tested via logistic regression.

Results

Sixty-five patients (69 ± 15 years; 49% women) with secondary MR underwent TEER with MitraClip. All patients had moderate-severe or severe (3-4+) MR preoperatively, with an average left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% and New York Heart Association class III symptoms. Procedural success, defined as ≤2+ MR post-TEER, was achieved in 94%. A suboptimal residual MR was observed in 38%. Independent predictors of suboptimal residual MR included bicommissural MR (odds ratio [OR], 7.95; 95% CI, 1.50-42.3; P = .02), 2-dimensional anteroposterior diameter (OR, 6.46; 95% CI, 1.85-22.51 per cm; P < .01), and mitral valve area to left ventricular end-diastolic volume ratio (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.93 per mm2/mL; P = .02).

Conclusions

Certain echocardiographic features, including bicommissural MR, a larger annular diameter, and a smaller ratio of mitral valve area to left ventricular end-diastolic volume, are associated with suboptimal residual MR following TEER. These preprocedural measurements may optimize patient selection in those with secondary MR being considered for TEER.

Mitral Valve Surgery for Persistent or Recurrent Mitral Regurgitation After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Is Associated With Improved Survival

Background

The management of severe mitral regurgitation (MR) after transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) remains a clinical conundrum. Considering the growing volume of TEER, more outcomes data for mitral surgery in this cohort are needed.

Methods and Results

Symptomatic patients with persistent or recurrent severe MR after TEER evaluated between May 2014 and June 2021 were included. The primary outcome was all‐cause mortality in patients who were treated with surgery versus medical therapy. The Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods were used to report risk‐adjusted survival analyses. Among the 142 included patients, 44 (31.0%) underwent mitral surgery. Patients who underwent surgery were younger than those treated medically (74.1±8.9 versus 78.6±10.5 years, P=0.01). Major comorbidities were similar except obesity, sleep apnea, left ventricular dimensions, and ejection fraction. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Operative Mortality was 9.0±4.7 versus 7.9±4.9 in the surgical versus medical therapy groups, respectively, P=0.22. Time from TEER to detection of severe MR was similar in both groups (median [interquartile range] 97.5 [39.5–384] versus 93.5 [40–389] days in the surgical versus medical groups, respectively [P>0.05]). In the surgical group, valve replacement was performed in all patients. Operative mortality was 4.5% (observed/expected ratio 0.55), and major complications were uncommon. After risk‐adjustment, surgery was associated with significantly lower all‐cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.12–0.92], P=0.001) compared with medial therapy.

Conclusions

Compared with medical therapy, mitral surgery in patients with severe persistent or recurrent MR after TEER is associated with lower mortality despite the high‐risk profile of these patients. Patients with severe MR after TEER should be considered for surgery at a referral mitral surgical center.

Outcomes of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Degenerative vs. Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Current guidelines support the use of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for patients with both primary and secondary mitral regurgitation. We aimed to compare the prognoses of TEER in degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) vs. functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). A total of 208 consecutive patients who underwent TEER over a ten-year period were analyzed. Primary endpoints included rates of all-cause death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE: composite of all-cause death, hospitalizations for heart failure, mitral valve surgery, or TEER re-intervention). A total of 148 (71%) patients were identified with FMR, while 60 (29%) were identified with DMR. Patients in the FMR group were younger (77.2 ± 8.4 vs. 80.2 ± 7.2, p = 0.02), suffered more frequently from coronary artery disease (54.1% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.02), and atrial fibrillation/flutter (70.9% vs. 38.3%, p = 0.02). Rates of 1-year death (21.6% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.03) and MACE (41.2% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.02) were higher for the FMR group, as compared to the DMR group. After correcting for variables, FMR independently predicted rates of MACE (HR-1.78, 95% CI 1.23–2.48, p = 0.04) and had a non-significant effect on one-year mortality (HR-1.67, 95%CI 0.98–3.74, p = 0.07). In our experience, worse overall 1-year composite MACE outcomes were observed after TEER in patients with FMR as compared to patients with DMR.

Coaptation Reserve Predicts Optimal Reduction in Mitral Regurgitation and Long-Term Survival With Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

BACKGROUND

Although transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is effective and safe, there is a need for better prediction of optimal outcomes. We aimed to determine predictors of optimal reduction in mitral regurgitation (MR) and survival with TEER.

METHODS

We examined mitral anatomy and its change with TEER on outcomes in 183 patients (age, 82 [77-87] years; 53% women). Coaptation reserve was measured as the distance of continuous apposition of the A2 and P2 leaflet segments in 2-dimensional apical long-axis imaging at the site of the predominant jet of MR. Augmentation in coaptation was measured as the total amount of leaflet insertion. Addressable coaptation area was calculated using the physical boundaries of the TEER device.

RESULTS

Coaptation reserve, its augmentation, and addressable coaptation area were strong predictors of MR reduction (all P<0.001), as well as heart failure hospitalization and death. For patients with either mild or no residual MR, median values for coaptation reserve, its augmentation, and addressable coaptation area were 3.7 (2.8-4.5) mm, 7.3 (5.2-9.5) mm, and 59.0 (48.0-71.8) mm2, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analyses determined the best values for optimal MR reduction as a coaptation reserve of >3.0 mm (P<0.001), addressable coaptation area of ≥52 mm2 (P<0.001), and coaptation augmentation of ≥4.7 mm (P<0.001). These values were associated with greater 2-year survival free of all-cause mortality and persisting even in analyses restricted to those with mild or no residual MR after TEER.

CONCLUSIONS

Coaptation reserve and its augmentation are simple, independent parameters that predict optimal MR reduction and better survival in patients undergoing TEER. These findings may have implications for patient selection and expanded use of the therapy.

Clinical outcomes and predictors in patients with previous cardiac surgery undergoing mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

BACKGROUND

Mitral-valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (MV-TEER) is recommended in patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and in those with degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) not eligible to traditional surgery. Patients with a history of previous cardiac surgery are considered at high risk for surgical reintervention, but data are lacking regarding procedural and clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and clinical results of MV-TEER in patients with previous cardiac surgery enrolled in the "multicentre Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology registry of transcatheter treatment of mitral valve regurgitation" (GIOTTO).

METHODS

Patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR), or mitral valve repair (MVR) were included. Those with multiple or combined previous cardiac surgeries were excluded. Clinical follow-up was performed at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years. The primary endpoint was a composite of death or rehospitalization at 1- and 2-year follow-ups.

RESULTS

A total of 330 patients enrolled in the GIOTTO registry were considered (CABG 77.9%, AVR 14.2%, and MVR 7.9%). Most patients showed FMR (66.9%), moderate reduction of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, and signs of LV dilation. Procedural and device successes were 94.8% and 97%. At 1 and 2 years, the composite endpoint occurred are 29.1% and 52.4%, respectively. The composite outcome rates were similar across the three subgroups of previous cardiac surgery (p = 0.928) and between the FMR and DMR subgroups (p = 0.850) at 2 years. In a multivariate analysis, residual mitral regurgitation (rMR) ≥2+ was the main predictor of adverse events at 1 year (hazard ratio: 1.54 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.00-2.38]; p = 0.050). This association was confirmed at 2 years of Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MV-TEER is effective in these patients, regardless of the subtype of previous cardiac surgery and the MR etiology. An rMR ≥2+ is independently associated with adverse outcomes at 1-year follow-up.

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Elevated Mitral Valve Pressure Gradient After Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the adverse impact of elevated postprocedural mitral valve pressure gradient (MPG) on outcome in a real-world population of patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) who underwent transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER).

BACKGROUND

TEER has become a routine treatment alternative for patients with severe MR at high surgical risk. The consequences of elevated MPG after TEER have been subject to controversial debates.

METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing TEER for either severe degenerative MR (DMR) or functional MR (FMR) at a high-volume center between September 2008 and January 2020 were prospectively included and followed periodically. Postprocedural MPG by discharge transthoracic echocardiography was considered elevated at ≥5 mm Hg. The primary combined endpoint was death or heart failure rehospitalization after 5 years.

RESULTS

A total of 713 patients undergoing TEER (DMR, n = 265; FMR, n = 445) were included. Elevated postprocedural MPG was present in 37.0% of those with DMR (n = 98) and 22.0% of those with FMR (n = 98). In contrast to patients with FMR, 6-minute walk distance did not improve in patients with DMR with elevated MPG. Kaplan-Meier analyses did not demonstrate significant differences for the primary endpoint in patients with DMR (low vs elevated MPG, 67.3% vs 74.4%; P = 0.06) and those with FMR (78.6% vs 74.8%; P = 0.54). After adjustment, elevated MPG was an independent predictor of the primary endpoint in patients with DMR (HR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.03-2.45; P = 0.034) but not in those with FMR (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.63-1.22; P = 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated postprocedural MPG is an independent predictor of adverse clinical and functional outcomes in patients with DMR but not in those with FMR.

Relative Impact of Surgical Mitral Repair and MitraClip on Annular Remodeling-A Potential Mechanism for Therapeutic Response to Mitral Repair for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is widely used to guide decision-making for mitral repair. The relative impact of surgical mitral valve repair (MVr) and MitraClip on annular remodeling is unknown. The aim was to determine the impact of both mitral repair strategies on annular geometry, including the primary outcome of annular circumference and area.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective observational study of patients who underwent mitral intervention between 2016 and 2020.

SETTING

Weill Cornell Medicine, a single, large, academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

The population comprised 50 patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing MVr.

INTERVENTIONS

Elective MVr and TEE.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients undergoing MitraClip or surgical MVr were matched (1:1) for sex and coronary artery disease. Mitral annular geometry indices were quantified on intraprocedural three-dimensional TEE. Mild or less MR on follow-up transthoracic echocardiography defined optimal response. Patients undergoing MitraClip were older (80 ± eight v 66 ± six years; p < 0.001) but were otherwise similar to surgical patients. Patients undergoing MitraClip had larger baseline left atrial and ventricular sizes, increased tenting height, and volume (p < 0.01), with a trend toward increased annular area (p = 0.23). MitraClip and surgery both induced immediate mitral annular remodeling, including decreased area, circumference, and tenting height (p < 0.001), with greater remodeling with surgical repair. At follow-up (4.1 ± 9.0 months) optimal response (≤ mild MR) was ∼twofold more common with surgery than MitraClip (81% v 46%; p = 0.02). The relative reduction in annular circumference (odds ratio [OR] 1.05 [1.00-1.09] per cm; p = 0.04) and area (OR 1.03 [1.00-1.05] per cm2; p = 0.049) were both associated with optimal response.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical MVr and MitraClip both reduce annular size, but repair-induced remodeling is greater with surgery and associated with an increased likelihood of optimal response.

Management and Outcome of Failed Percutaneous Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Plasty: Insight From an International Registry

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the incidence, management, and outcome of patients who experienced MitraClip (Abbott Vascular) failure secondary to loss of leaflet insertion (LLI), single leaflet detachment (SLD), or embolization.

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with MitraClip is an established therapy for the treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR), but no data exist regarding the prevalence and outcome according to the mode of clip failure.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2020, we retrospectively screened 4,294 procedures of MitraClip performed in 19 centers. LLI was defined as damage to the leaflet where the MitraClip was attached, SLD as demonstration of complete separation between the device and a single leaflet tissue, and clip embolization as loss of contact between MitraClip and both leaflets.

RESULTS

A total of 147 cases of MitraClip failure were detected (overall incidence = 3.5%), and these were secondary to LLI or SLD in 47 (31.9%) and 99 (67.3%) cases, respectively, whereas in 1 (0.8%) case clip embolization was observed. MitraClip failure occurred in 67 (45.5%) patients with functional MR, in 64 (43.5%) patients with degenerative MR, and 16 (10.8%) with mixed etiology. Although the majority of MitraClip failures were detected before discharge (47 intraprocedural and 42 in the hospital), up to 39.5% of cases were diagnosed at follow-up. In total, 80 (54.4%) subjects underwent a redo procedure, either percutaneously with MitraClip (n = 51, 34.7%) or surgically (n = 36, 24.5%) including 4 cases of surgical conversion of the index procedure and 7 cases of bailout surgery after unsuccessful redo MitraClip. After a median follow-up of 163 days (IQR: 22-720 days), 50 (43.9%) subjects presented moderate to severe MR, and 43 (29.3%) patients died. An up-front redo MitraClip strategy was associated with a trend toward a reduced rate of death at follow-up vs surgical or conservative management (P = 0.067), whereas postprocedural acute kidney injury, age, and moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation were independent predictors of death.

CONCLUSIONS

MitraClip failure secondary to LLI and SLD is not a rare phenomenon and may occur during and also beyond hospitalization. Redo MitraClip strategy demonstrates a trend toward a reduced risk of death compared with bailout surgery and conservative management. A third of those patients remained with more than moderate MR and had substantial mortality at the intermediate-term follow-up.

One-year results following PASCAL-based or MitraClip-based mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

Aims

Mitral valve transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) has been established as a suitable alternative to mitral valve surgery in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and high surgical risk. The PASCAL system represents a novel device, potentially augmenting the toolkit for TEER. The aim of this study was to assess and compare short and 1 year safety and efficacy of the PASCAL and MitraClip systems for TEER.

Methods and results

Procedural, short, and 1 year outcomes of a 1:2 propensity‐matched cohort including 41 PASCAL and 82 MitraClip cases were investigated. Matching was based on clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and functional characteristics. The primary endpoints assessed were procedural success [as defined by the Mitral Valve Academy Research Consortium (MVARC)], residual MR, functional class, and a composite endpoint comprising death, heart failure hospitalization, and mitral valve re‐intervention. We found for the PASCAL and the matched MitraClip cohort no significant differences in MVARC defined technical (90.2% vs. 95.1%, P = 0.44), device (90.2% vs. 89.0%, P = 1.0), or procedural (87.8% vs. 80.5%, P = 0.45) success rates. Accordingly, the overall MR reduction and improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class were comparable (1 year follow‐up: MR ≤ 2 95% vs. 93.6%, P = 1.0; NYHA ≤ 2 57.1% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.59). The composite outcome revealed no statistically significant difference between both devices (1 year follow‐up: 31.7% vs. 37.8%, P = 0.55). Interestingly, we found at both short and 1 year follow‐up a significantly higher rate of patients with none or trace MR in the PASCAL‐treated cohort (short follow‐up: 17.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.0081; 1 year follow‐up: 25% vs. 0%, P = 0.0016). Conversely, the rate of aborted device implantations due to an elevated transmitral gradient was higher in PASCAL interventions (9.8% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.04).

Conclusions

Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair using the PASCAL or MitraClip device results in favourable and comparable outcomes regarding safety, efficacy, and clinical improvement after 1 year.

Role of 3D Transesophageal Echocardiography for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair—A Mini Review

Edge-to-edge transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) using MitraClip has been evolving rapidly in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) at high surgical risk or having contraindications for surgery. Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography plays an important role in the management of severe MR. In particular, 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) imaging allows the evaluation of MV geometry and quantification of MR severity with dedicated software. Real-time 3D TEE is also commonly used to guide TMVr and facilitate the procedure. Further development of 3D echocardiography may help achieve safer and more beneficial results. The following article summarizes the current knowledge and the future perspectives of 3D TEE in TMVr.

Predictors of optimal procedural result after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in secondary mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Procedural success after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) is defined as a reduction of mitral regurgitation (MR) degree to <moderate (2+). However, post-procedural MR 0/1+ was found to be associated with a better outcome and a lower rate of MR recurrence compared to post-procedural MR 2+.

AIM

To evaluate predictors and prognostic impact of optimal procedural result (MR 0/1+) after TEER.

METHODS

The Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GIse) Registry of Transcatheter Treatment of Mitral Valve RegurgitaTiOn (GIOTTO) is a large multicenter registry including patients undergoing TEER in 19 Italian centers between January 2016 and March 2020. For the purpose of this analysis, only patients with secondary MR and successful TEER were included.

RESULTS

Among 950 patients enrolled, 637 (67%) had an optimal procedural result (MR 0/1+) and 313 (33%) had an acceptable procedural result (MR 2+) after TEER. Moderate-to-severe, rather than severe, MR, left ventricular end-systolic diameter <70 mm at baseline, and treatment in centers performing ≥20 procedures/year were independent predictors of the optimal procedural result. Compared to patients with acceptable procedural result, those with optimal result had shorter device time and length of stay and better outcomes with lower rates of all-cause and cardiac deaths (25.7% vs. 40%, p < 0.001 and 16.3% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.003, respectively) and HF hospitalizations (24% vs. 30%; p = 0.035) at 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with secondary MR undergoing TEER, an optimal procedural result is associated with favorable outcomes and can be achieved by selecting patients with moderate-to-severe MR, without severe left ventricular dilatation, and treated in high-volume centers. CLASSIFICATIONS: mitral regurgitation, mitral valve repair, chronic heart failure.

Immediate Post-Procedural and Discharge Assessment of Mitral Valve Function Following Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair: Correlation and Association with Outcomes

The correlation between residual mitral regurgitation (rMR) grade or mitral valve pressure gradient (MVPG), at transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEEMr) completion and at discharge, is unknown. Furthermore, there is disagreement regarding rMR grade or MVPG from which prognosis diverts. We retrospectively studied 82 patients that underwent TEEMr. We tested the correlation between rMR or MVPG and evaluated their association, with outcomes. Moderate or less rMR (rMR ≤ 2) at TEEMr completion was associated with improved survival, whereas mild or less rMR (rMR ≤ 1) was not. Patients with rMR ≤ 1 at discharge demonstrated a longer time of survival, of first heart failure hospitalization and of both. The correlation for both rMR grade (r = 0.5, p < 0.001) and MVPG (r = 0.51, p < 0.001), between TEEMr completion and discharge, was moderate. MR ≤ 2 at TMEER completion was the strongest predictor for survival (HR 0.08, p < 0.001) whereas rMR ≤ 1 at discharge was independently associated with a lower risk of the combined endpoint (HR 4.17, p = 0.012). MVPG was not associated with adverse events. We conclude that the assessments for rMR grade and MVPG, at the completion of TEEMr and at discharge, should be distinctly reported. Improved outcome is expected with rMR ≤ 2 at TEEMr completion and rMR ≤ 1 at discharge. Higher MVPG is not associated with unfavorable outcomes.

General Anesthesia Leads to Underestimation of Regurgitation Severity in Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation Undergoing Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of general anesthesia (GA) on severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty consecutive patients with symptomatic severe MR and extremely high surgical risk.

INTERVENTION

TMVR under GA.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Transesophageal echocardiography was performed during the preprocedural workup under conscious sedation and during TMVR under GA. After the parameters of MR were assessed, color-flow jet area (CJA), vena contracta (VC), effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA), regurgitant volume (RVOL), three-dimensional (3D) vena contracta area (VCA), and severity of MR were compared between the two examinations. In patients with primary MR (n = 11), there were no significant differences in CJA, VC, EROA, RVOL, or 3D-VCA between pre- and intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography. In patients with secondary MR (n = 39), GA led to significant decreases of CJA (10 ± 7 v 7 ± 3 cm², p < 0.001), VC (5.5 ± 1.6 v 4.7 ± 1.5 mm, p = 0.002), EROA (30 ± 11 v 24 ± 10 mm², p < 0.001), and RVOL (47 ± 17 v 34 ± 13 mL/beat, p < 0.001). Consequently, GA led to a downgrade of regurgitation severity classification in 44% of patients when assessed by two-dimensional analysis. When evaluated by 3D analysis, GA also led to a significant but less extensive decrease of MR (3D-VCA: 66 ± 27 v 60 ± 29 mm², p = 0.002), and subsequent downgrade of MR classification in 20% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

GA underestimates regurgitation severity in patients with secondary, but not primary MR, undergoing TMVR. This effect must be considered when evaluating the immediate result of the procedure.

Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for symptomatic high surgical risk patients with significant mitral regurgitation - Short term and one year follow up results from a single center in India

This series reports the safety and feasibility of MitraClip (Abbott Vascular) in 7 high surgical risk Indian patients with symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR). The clip was deployed successfully in all patients, and more than one clip was required in 5. All had reduction in MR to ≤2+. Mean mitral valve gradient was 3.0 ± 0.8 mmHg. At 12 months follow up, all were alive, and the MR grade was 1+ in 6 patients and 2+ in one. Mean MV gradient was 3.4 ± 1.0 mmHg. The modified Kansas City Quality of life (KCQ) analysis revealed significant improvement in their quality of life (p < 0.0001).

Surgical versus transcatheter repair for secondary mitral regurgitation: A propensity score-matched cohorts comparison

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and clinical outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVr) and surgical mitral valve repair (SMVr) among patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with SMR treated using either TMVr (n = 199) or SMVr (n = 222) at 2 centers were included and retrospectively analyzed. To account for differences in patient demographic characteristics, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed. The primary endpoint was all-cause death within 2 years after the procedure.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 202 matched patients. At 2 years, all-cause mortality was 24.3% for TMVr and 23.0% for SMVr (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.71; P = .909). Severe heart failure symptoms at 2 years were less prevalent after SMVr (New York Heart Association functional class III or IV: 13.5% vs 29.5%; P = .032) than after TMVr. A higher proportion of the SMVr patients had SMR reduction to none or mild at discharge (90.8% vs 72.0%; P < .001) and 2 years (86.5% vs 59.6%; P < .001). Among patients who achieved none or mild MR at discharge, 7 patients (10.1%) in the SMVr group and 15 (34.9%) in the TMVr group had progression to moderate or greater MR at 2 years (P = .003). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) significantly improved (+10.1% ± 11.1%; P < .001) after SMVr (LVEF at 2 years: 45.7% ± 12.8%), whereas it remained unchanged (-1.3% ± 8.9%; P = .260) after TMVr (LVEF at 2 years: 34.0% ± 13.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this propensity score-matched analysis, there was no significant difference in 2-year survival between TMVr and SMVr, despite greater and more durable SMR reduction, as well as LVEF improvement in the surgical group.

1-Year Outcomes for Transcatheter Repair in Patients With Mitral Regurgitation From the CLASP Study

OBJECTIVES

The authors report the CLASP (Edwards PASCAL Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair System Study) expanded experience, 1-year outcomes, and analysis by functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR).

BACKGROUND

The 30-day results from the CLASP study of the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system for clinically significant mitral regurgitation (MR) have been previously reported.

METHODS

Eligible patients had symptomatic MR ≥3+, were receiving optimal medical therapy, and were deemed candidates for transcatheter mitral repair by the local heart team. Primary endpoints included procedural success, clinical success, and major adverse event rate at 30 days. Follow-up was continued to 1 year.

RESULTS

One hundred nine patients were treated (67% FMR, 33% DMR); the mean age was 75.5 years, and 57% were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. At 30 days, there was 1 cardiovascular death (0.9%), MR ≤1+ was achieved in 80% of patients (77% FMR, 86% DMR) and MR ≤2+ in 96% (96% FMR, 97% DMR), 88% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II, 6-min walk distance had improved by 28 m, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score had improved by 16 points (p < 0.001 for all). At 1 year, Kaplan-Meier survival was 92% (89% FMR 96% DMR) with 88% freedom from heart failure hospitalization (80% FMR, 100% DMR), MR was ≤1+ in 82% of patients (79% FMR, 86% DMR) and ≤2+ in 100% of patients, 88% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score had improved by 14 points (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

The PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system demonstrated a low complication rate and high survival, with robust sustained MR reduction accompanied by significant improvements in functional status and quality of life at 1 year. (The CLASP Study Edwards PASCAL Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair System Study [CLASP]; NCT03170349).

Impact of Mitral Annular Dilation on Edge-to-Edge Therapy With MitraClip-XTR

[Figure: see text].

Implantation of one, two or multiple MitraClips for transcatheter mitral valve repair: insights from a 1824-patient multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) with the MitraClip device is an established treatment for mitral regurgitation (MR). More than one MitraClip may be implanted if a single one does not reduce MR adequately. We aimed at appraising the outlook of patients undergoing implantation of one, two or multiple MitraClips for TMVR.

METHODS

Exploiting the ongoing prospective GIse registry Of Transcatheter treatment of mitral valve regurgitaTiOn (GIOTTO) Study dataset, we compared patients, procedural details and outcomes distinguishing those receiving one, two or multiple MitraClips. The primary endpoint was the composite of 1-year cardiac death or rehospitalization for heart failure. Additional endpoints included all cause death, surgical mitral repair, and functional class. Multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis was used for confirmatory purposes.

RESULTS

As many as 1824 patients were included: 718 (39.4%) treated with a single MitraClip, and 940 (51.5%) receiving two MitraClips, and 166 (9.1%) receiving three or more. Significant differences were found for baseline features, including age, female gender, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, prior myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, permanent pacemaker, cardiac resynchronization therapy, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and prior mitral valve repair (all p<0.05). Several imaging features were also different, including left ventricular dimensions, MR severity and proportionality, mitral valve area, flail leaflet, and pulmonary vein flow (all p<0.05). Among procedural features, significant differences were found for anesthesia type, MitraClip type, fluoroscopy, device, and operating room times, postprocedural mitral gradient, residual MR, smoke-like effect, device success partial detachment and surgical conversion (all p<0.05). In-hospital death occurred more frequently in patients receiving multiple MitraClips, and the same applied severe residual MR (all p<0.05). Mid-term follow-up (15±13 months) showed significant difference in the risk of death, cardiac death, rehospitalization for heart failure, and their composites, mainly, but not solely, associated with multiple MitraClips (all p<0.05). Adjusted analysis confirmed the significantly increased risk of composite adverse events when comparing the multiple vs single MitraClip groups (p=0.014 for death and rehospitalization, p=0.013 for cardiac death or rehospitalization).

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of one or two MitraClips is associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Conversely, bail-out implantation of three or more MitraClips may portend a worse long-term prognosis.

Impact of Residual Mitral Regurgitation on Survival After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of residual mitral regurgitation (resMR) on mortality with respect to left ventricular dilatation (LV-Dil) or right ventricular dysfunction (RV-Dys) in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) who underwent mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER).

BACKGROUND

The presence of LV-Dil and RV-Dys correlates with advanced stages of heart failure in SMR patients, which may impact the outcome after TEER.

METHODS

SMR patients in a European multicenter registry were evaluated. Investigated outcomes were 2-year all-cause mortality and improvement in New York Heart Association functional class with respect to MR reduction, LV-Dil (defined as LV end-diastolic volume ≥159 ml), and RV-Dys (defined as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion-to-systolic pulmonary artery pressure ratio of <0.274 mm/mm Hg).

RESULTS

Among 809 included patients, resMR ≤1+ was achieved in 546 (67%) patients. Overall estimated 2-year mortality rate was 32%. Post-procedural resMR was significantly associated with mortality (p = 0.031). Although the improvement in New York Heart Association functional class persisted regardless of either LV-Dil or RV-Dys, the beneficial treatment effect of resMR ≤1+ on 2-year mortality was observed only in patients without LV-Dil and RV-Dys (hazard ratio: 1.75; 95% confidence interval: 1.03 to 3.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving optimal MR reduction by TEER is associated with improved survival in SMR patients, especially if the progress in heart failure is not too advanced. In SMR patients with advanced stages of heart failure, as evidenced by LV-Dil or RV-Dys, the treatment effect of TEER on symptomatic improvement is maintained, but the survival benefit appears to be reduced.

Relationship Between Residual Mitral Regurgitation and Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Transcatheter and Medical Treatments in Heart Failure: COAPT Trial

BACKGROUND

In the randomized COAPT trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation), among 614 patients with heart failure with 3+ or 4+ secondary mitral regurgitation (MR), transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) with the MitraClip reduced MR, heart failure hospitalizations, and mortality and improved quality of life compared with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) alone. We aimed to examine the prognostic relationship between MR reduction and outcomes after TMVr and GDMT alone.

METHODS

Outcomes in COAPT between 30 days and 2 years were examined on the basis of the severity of residual MR at 30 days.

RESULTS

TMVr-treated patients had less severe residual MR at 30 days than GDMT-treated patients (0/1+, 2+, and 3+/4+: 72.9%, 19.9%, and 7.2% versus 8.2%, 26.1%, and 65.8%, respectively [P<0.0001]). The rate of composite death or heart failure hospitalizations between 30 days and 2 years was lower in patients with 30-day residual MR of 0/1+ and 2+ compared with patients with 30-day residual MR of 3+/4+ (37.7% versus 49.5% versus 72.2%, respectively [P<0.0001]). This relationship was consistent in the TMVr and GDMT arms (P_interaction=0.92). The improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score from baseline to 30 days was maintained between 30 days and 2 years in patients with 30-day MR ≤2+ but deteriorated in those with 30-day MR 3+/4+ (-0.3±1.7 versus -9.4±4.6 [P=0.0008]) consistently in both groups (P_interaction=0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

In the COAPT trial, reduced MR at 30 days was associated with greater freedom from death or heart failure hospitalizations and improved quality of life through 2-year follow-up whether the MR reduction was achieved by TMVr or GDMT. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01626079.

2-Year Outcomes for Transcatheter Repair in Patients With Mitral Regurgitation From the CLASP Study

OBJECTIVES

This study reports 2-year outcomes from the multicenter, prospective, single-arm CLASP study with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and degenerative MR (DMR) analysis.

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter repair is a favorable option to treat MR. Long-term prognostic impact of the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system in patients with clinically significant MR remains to be established.

METHODS

Patients had clinically significant MR ≥3+ as evaluated by the echocardiographic core laboratory and were deemed candidates for transcatheter repair by the heart team. Assessments were performed by clinical events committee to 1 year (site-reported thereafter) and core laboratory to 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients (69% FMR, 31% DMR) were enrolled with a mean age of 75 years, 56% were male, 60% were New York Heart Association functional class III to IVa, and 100% had MR ≥3+. At 2 years, Kaplan-Meier estimates showed 80% survival (72% FMR, 94% DMR) and 84% freedom from heart failure (HF) hospitalization (78% FMR, 97% DMR), with 85% reduction in annualized HF hospitalization rate (81% FMR, 98% DMR). MR ≤1+ was achieved in 78% of patients (84% FMR, 71% DMR) and MR ≤2+ was achieved in 97% (95% FMR, 100% DMR) (all p < 0.001). Left ventricular end-diastolic volume decreased by 33 ml (p < 0.001); 93% of patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I to II (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The PASCAL repair system demonstrated sustained favorable outcomes at 2 years in FMR and DMR patients. Results showed high survival and freedom from HF rehospitalization rates with a significantly reduced annualized HF hospitalization rate. Durable MR reduction was achieved with evidence of left ventricular reverse remodeling and significant improvement in functional status. The CLASP IID/IIF randomized pivotal trial is ongoing.

Early outcomes from the CLASP IID trial roll-in cohort for prohibitive risk patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation

OBJECTIVES

We report the 30-day outcomes from the roll-in cohort of the CLASP IID trial, representing the first procedures performed by each site.

BACKGROUND

The currently enrolling CLASP IID/IIF pivotal trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial assessing the safety and effectiveness of the PASCAL transcatheter valve repair system in patients with clinically significant MR. The trial allows for up to three roll-in patients per site.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria were: DMR ≥3+, prohibitive surgical risk, and deemed suitable for transcatheter repair by the local heart team. Trial oversight included a central screening committee and echocardiographic core laboratory. The primary safety endpoint was a 30-day composite MAE: cardiovascular mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), new need for renal replacement therapy, severe bleeding, and non-elective mitral valve re-intervention, adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee. Thirty-day echocardiographic, functional, and quality of life outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 45 roll-in patients with mean age of 83 years and 69% in NYHA class III/IV were treated. Successful implantation was achieved in 100%. The 30-day composite MAE rate was 8.9% including one cardiovascular death (2.2%) due to severe bleeding from a hemorrhagic stroke, one MI, and no need for re-intervention. MR≤1+ was achieved in 73% and ≤2+ in 98% of patients. 89% of patients were in NYHA class I/II (p < .001) with improvements in 6MWD (30 m; p = .054) and KCCQ (17 points; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early results representing sites with first experience with the PASCAL repair system showed favorable 30-day outcomes in patients with DMR≥3+ at prohibitive surgical risk.

Impact of Leaflet Tethering on Residual Regurgitation in Patients With Degenerative Mitral Disease After Interventional Edge-to-Edge Repair

Background: Grade 2+ residual mitral regurgitation (MR 2+) is associated with the recurrence of MR and a lower survival rate in interventional mitral valve (MV) edge-to-edge (EE) repair. We sought to determine the MV anatomic factors affecting residual MR 2+ during interventional EE repair with the ValveClamp system in patients with degenerative MR (DMR).

Methods: In this multicenter study, 62 patients with significant (grade 3+ to 4+) DMR underwent ValveClamp implantation across eight centers from July 2018 to December 2019. Patient clinical, anatomical, and procedural characteristics were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed.

Results: A single clamp was implanted in 59 patients, and two clamps were implanted in three patients. Residual MR 2+ was found in 14 patients (22.6%) immediately after the ValveClamp procedure. Patients with residual MR 2+ showed significantly larger preoperative tenting sizes and annular dimensions than the residual MR ≤1+ group. Multivariate analysis identified tenting volume as the major determinant of residual MR 2+ after ValveClamp procedures (odds ratio, 1.410 per 0.1-mL/m² increase; 95% confidence interval, 1.167–1.705; P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curves identified a tenting volume index ≥0.82 mL/m² as the optimal cutoff point to predict residual MR 2+ (area under curve, 0.84). Patients with a tenting volume index ≥0.82 mL/m² were more likely to develop recurrent 3+ MR or undergo MV surgery during short-term follow-up (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Preoperative assessment of the tenting volume index will help to predict intraoperative residual MR 2+ in patients with DMR receiving EE-based interventional repair. Improvements in the interventional strategy are warranted for sustained MR reduction in patients with DMR with unfavorable anatomy.

PASCAL mitral valve repair system versus MitraClip: comparison of transcatheter edge-to-edge strategies in complex primary mitral regurgitation

Background

The PASCAL system is a novel device for edge-to-edge treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the PASCAL to the MitraClip system in a highly selected group of patients with complex primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) defined as effective regurgitant orifice area (MR-EROA) ≥ 0.40 cm², large flail gap (≥ 5 mm) or width (≥ 7 mm) or Barlow’s disease.

Methods

38 patients with complex PMR undergoing mitral intervention using PASCAL (n = 22) or MitraClip (n = 16) were enrolled. Primary efficacy endpoints were procedural success and degree of residual MR at discharge. The rate of major adverse events (MAE) according to the Mitral Valve Academic Consortium (MVARC) criteria was chosen as the primary safety endpoint.

Results

Patient collectives did not differ relevantly regarding pertinent baseline parameters. Patients` median age was 83.0 [77.5–85.3] years (PASCAL) and 82.5 [76.5–86.5] years (MitraClip). MR-EROA at baseline was 0.70 [0.68–0.83] cm² (PASCAL) and 0.70 [0.50–0.90] cm² (MitraClip), respectively. 3D-echocardiographic morphometry of the mitral valve apparatus revealed no relevant differences between groups. Procedural success was achieved in 95.5% (PASCAL) and 87.5% (MitraClip), respectively. In 86.4% of the patients a residual MR grade ≤ 1 + was achieved with PASCAL whereas reduction to MR grade ≤ 1 + with MitraClip was achieved in 62.5%. Neither procedure time number of implanted devices, nor transmitral gradient differed significantly. No periprocedural MAE according to MVARC occured.

Conclusion

In this highly selected patient group with complex PMR both systems exhibited equal procedural safety. MitraClip and PASCAL reduced qualitative and semi-quantitative parameters of MR to an at least comparable extent.

Graphic abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-021-01845-8.

Selection of the Optimal Candidate to MitraClip for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Beyond Mitral Valve Morphology

Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) occurs despite structurally normal valve apparatus due to an underlying disease of the myocardium leading to disruption of the balance between tethering and closing forces with ensuing failure of leaflet coaptation. In patients with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular dysfunction, secondary MR is independently associated with poor outcome, yet prognostic benefits related to the correction of MR have remained elusive. Surgery is not recommended for the correction of secondary MR outside coronary artery bypass grafting. Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) with MitraClip implantation has recently evolved as a new transcatheter treatment option of inoperable or high-risk patients with severe MR, with promising results supporting the extension of guideline recommendations. MitraClip is highly effective in reducing secondary MR in HF patients. However, the derived clinical benefit is still controversial as two randomized trials directly comparing PMVR vs. optimal medical therapy in severe secondary MR yielded virtually opposite conclusions. We reviewed current evidence to identify predictors of PMVR-related outcomes in secondary MR useful to improve the timing and the selection of patients who would derive maximal benefit from MitraClip intervention. Beyond mitral valve anatomy, optimal candidate selection should rely on a comprehensive diagnostic workup and a fine-tuned risk stratification process aimed at (i) recognizing the substantial heterogeneity of secondary MR and its complex interaction with the myocardium, (ii) foreseeing hemodynamic consequences of PMVR, (iii) anticipating futility and (iv) improving symptoms, quality of life and overall survival.

Comparison of percutaneous MitraClip versus mitral valve surgery for severe mitral regurgitation: a meta-analysis: Mitraclip and mitral valve surgery meta-analysis

AIMS

Mitral valve surgery (MVS) is the gold-standard treatment for severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation. Percutaneous mitral valve interventions such as the MitraClip procedure offer another dimension to its management particularly in high-risk patients. We meta-analysed the outcomes of MitraClip and MVS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus from 1980/01-2019/06 were searched for eligible studies. Data were extracted and pooled using random-effects models. After screening 959 studies and reviewing 21 full-text articles, nine studies totalling 640 MitraClip and 531 MVS (91% valve repair) procedures were included in the meta-analysis. MitraClip patients were older, with a higher prevalence of previous cardiac surgery, coronary disease and a higher EuroSCORE (all p<0.05) than MVS patients. Pooled operative mortality was similar for MitraClip, 3%, versus MVS, 5%, odds ratio (OR): 0.58, 95%, CI: 0.28-1.19, as well as at 1 year mortality, OR: 1.09, CI: 0.71-1.68 and 3-year mortality, OR: 1.08, CI: 0.72-0.163. MitraClip patients had higher rates of early and late significant mitral regurgitation (MR) and more cardiovascular readmissions, while MVS had higher rates of in-hospital bleeding and pacemaker implantation (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MitraClip patients had a higher baseline risk than MVS, but there were no significant differences in short- and long-term mortality. MitraClip patients had higher rates of cardiovascular admissions and significant MR post-operatively, while MVS patients had more procedural complications.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair with the PASCAL system: early results from a real-world series

AIMS

This study sought to characterise the real-world performance and clinical outcomes of the PASCAL system, a leaflet approximation device for transcatheter mitral valve repair.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty patients in NYHA Class II-IV despite optimal medical therapy (median age 78.0 years [IQR 74.5-81.0], 52% female, log EuroSCORE 21.6 [IQR 13.2-30.2]) were treated for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and followed up for one month. Primary and secondary MR was present in 24% and 68% of patients, respectively, with a mixed aetiology observed in 8%. A 1-device strategy was employed in 26/50 patients (52%), a 2-device strategy in 23/50 (46%) patients, and a 3-device strategy in 1/50 (2%) patients. Technical and procedural success was achieved in 100% and 98% of patients, respectively. MR grade ≤1 was observed in 39/50 (78%) patients at discharge, and in 36/46 (78%) patients at one month, with transvalvular gradients remaining ≤5 mmHg in all patients. One device embolisation and one single leaflet device attachment were observed during follow-up. After one month, 73% of patients reported an improvement in NYHA class, and six-minute walk test distance increased by 73±12 m in patients without relevant tricuspid regurgitation.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world population, the PASCAL device effectively reduces MR and leads to functional improvements on short-term follow-up.

Insufficient Mitral Leaflet Remodeling in Relation to Annular Dilation and Risk of Residual Mitral Regurgitation After MitraClip Implantation

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the mitral valve (MV) total leaflet area (TLA)-to-mitral annular area (MAA) (TLA/MAA) ratio measured using 3-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was associated with residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after MitraClip implantation in patients with secondary MR.

BACKGROUND

The factors influencing the results of MitraClip implantation for secondary MR are controversial. This study hypothesized that insufficient remodeling of the mitral leaflets relative to the annular dilation may be associated with significant MR after MitraClip implantation.

METHODS

This study included patients with secondary MR treated with MitraClips. Using 3D TEE dataset, the TLA in diastole and MAA in systole were measured with dedicated software.

RESULTS

In a total cohort of 119 patients (mean age 74 ± 9 years; 61% male), significant residual MR (≥2+) was present in 43 patients (36%). In patients with significant residual MR, MAA was greater than in patients without residual MR (10.7 ± 2.4 cm² vs. 9.0 ± 2.1 cm²; p < 0.001) whereas no significant difference was observed in TLA (12.2 ± 2.6 cm² vs. 12.0 ± 2.9 cm²; p = 0.836). TLA/MAA ratio was lower in patients with significant residual MR as compared to their counterparts (1.14 ± 0.15 vs. 1.34 ± 0.16; p < 0.001), suggesting insufficient leaflet remodeling relative to annular dilation. On receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the TLA/MAA ratio had better discriminative power to identify patients who will have significant residual MR compared to MAA alone (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.830 vs. 0.723; p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with secondary MR, insufficient mitral leaflet remodeling relative to the annulus dilation, as reflected by a lower TLA/MAA ratio, is associated with significant residual MR after MitraClip implantation.

Future Perspectives in Percutaneous Treatment of Tricuspid Regurgitation

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has a not negligible prevalence and its severity is correlated with poorer outcomes. However, surgical options are rarely offered to these patients because of their high surgical risk. Given that medical therapy plays a limited role in the management of these patients, there is an increasing clinical need for transcatheter treatment options. Although, transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVIs) are still at an early stage, emerging data suggests their clinical effectiveness and safety, with preliminary results highlighting the potential benefits of transcatheter treatments over medical therapy. In this review, we highlight the challenges and future directions of current and emerging technologies dedicated to the treatment of TR along with an analysis of the next steps required in future clinical trials and studies dedicated to the treatment of the forgotten valve.

Impact of disproportionate secondary mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing edge-to-edge percutaneous mitral valve repair

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of echocardiographic parameters assessing secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) severity and left ventricular dimension, including proportionate versus disproportionate SMR, in MitraClip recipients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed 137 patients undergoing MitraClip implantation for SMR at three centres. SMR was classified as proportionate or disproportionate based on the median value of the ratio between effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalisation at two-year follow-up. Mean age was 70±10 years, 80% were male, and median EuroSCORE II was 5.7%. No differences were observed in the disproportionate compared to the proportionate group except for a more severe NYHA class and their expected higher EROA and lower LVEDV. Number of clips deployed, device success and procedural success were similar between the two groups. Residual mitral regurgitation (MR) >1+ at 30 days was more common among patients with an EROA >0.42 cm2 compared to those with an EROA ≤0.42 cm2 (81.3% vs 58%; p=0.004). The relative risk of the primary endpoint was independent from any echocardiographic parameter, including the presence of disproportionate SMR. The only independent predictors of clinical events were EuroSCORE II >8%, NYHA class and residual MR >1+ at 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Echocardiographic parameters, including the EROA/LVEDV ratio, do not have independent prognostic value in patients undergoing MitraClip implantation. High surgical risk, advanced symptoms and non-optimal MR reduction increase the relative risk of two-year clinical events.

Prognostic Impact of Redo Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair for Recurrent Mitral Regurgitation

There is little known about the prognostic impact of a redo transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) for residual or recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR). From January 2011 to March 2019, we identified 43 consecutive patients who underwent a redo TMVR procedure with the MitraClip system. A control cohort was treated medically for MR ≥2+ after the first TMVR and was propensity score 1:1 matched using age, gender, MR severity, trans-mitral pressure gradient, and etiology of MR. To investigate the association of redo TMVR with 1-year mortality, we fitted a Cox proportional hazard model. The technical success rate of redo TMVR was 95%. A reduction in MR to ≤2+ was achieved in 79% of patients, with a significant decline of tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient and improvement of the New York Heart Association class. After matching was performed, 43 well-matched pairs of patients were analyzed. Redo TMVR patients showed lower 1-year mortality (10.5% vs 37.6%, p = 0.01) compared with the control patients. Redo TMVR was associated with better survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08 to 0.79, p = 0.02) and lower risk of the composite end point (mortality and rehospitalization due to HF: HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.78; p = 0.01) at 1-year follow-up. The association with the primary end point remained significant after accounting for the New York Heart Association class III/IV, TR ≥severe, the type of MR (i.e., recurrent or residual MR), or the type of previous implanted TMVR device. In conclusion, redo TMVR in selected patients with residual or recurrent MR may be associated with lower 1-year mortality than medical therapy alone.