The ripple effect of a complication in lung transplantation: Evidence for increased long-term survival risk

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Postoperative Hepatic Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatic dysfunction is a morbid complication of lung transplantation. Little is known about risk factors for postoperative hepatic dysfunction or its impact on survival after lung transplantation.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of 1406 adult lung transplant recipients was performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania between January 1, 2007 and December 1, 2019. Patients were excluded for redo lung transplantation, concomitant cardiac surgery, or concurrent solid organ transplantation. Postoperative liver dysfunction was classified as either ischemic liver injury or nonischemic dysfunction (transaminitis, hyperbilirubinemia).

RESULTS

Among the 1155 primary lung transplant recipients included, postoperative hepatic dysfunction developed in 96 (8.3%) after lung transplantation. A history of liver disease was the greatest predictor of postoperative hepatic dysfunction (odds ratio, 6.19; CI, 2.13-17.4; P < .001). Patients with postoperative hepatic dysfunction had a greater need for intraoperative blood products (ischemic, 12 U [range, 6-21 U]; nonischemic, 10 U [range, 4-28 U]; vs none, 4 U [range, 1-12 U]; P < .001) and an increased need for postoperative circulatory support (ischemic, 16 [76%]; nonischemic, 25 [33%]; none, 117 [11%]; P < .001). Both ischemic liver injury and nonischemic dysfunction were associated with diminished 1-, 3-, and 5-year term survival (ischemic, 27.5%, 16.5%, and 0%, respectively; nonischemic, 60%, 49.6%, and 46.9%, respectively; none, 87.3%, 72.3%, and 59.5%, respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic dysfunction after lung transplantation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A history of liver disease was the best positive predictor for postoperative dysfunction. Additional studies are necessary to identify the best treatment algorithm to avoid hepatic dysfunction more effectively in the postoperative setting after lung transplantation.

Expanding Donor Options for Lung Transplant: Extended Criteria, Donation After Circulatory Death, ABO Incompatibility, and Evolution of Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion

Only using brain-dead donors with standard criteria, the existing donor shortage has never improved in lung transplantation. Currently, clinical efforts have sought the means to use cohorts of untapped donors, such as extended criteria donors, donation after circulatory death, and donors that are ABO blood group incompatible, and establish the evidence for their potential contribution to the lung transplant needs. Also, technical maturation for using those lungs may eliminate immediate concerns about the early posttransplant course, such as primary graft dysfunction or hyperacute rejection. In addition, recent clinical and preclinical advances in ex vivo lung perfusion techniques have allowed the safer use of lungs from high-risk donors and graft modification to match grafts to recipients and may improve posttransplant outcomes. This review summarizes recent trends and accomplishments and future applications for expanding the donor pool in lung transplantation.

Postoperative vasoplegia in lung transplantation: incidence and relation to outcome

BACKGROUND

The incidence and clinical importance of vasoplegia after lung transplantation remains poorly studied. We describe the incidence of vasoplegia and its association with complications after lung transplantation.

METHODS

Perioperative data of 279 lung transplant recipients operated on from 2015 to 2020 were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

Vasoplegia occurred in 41.6% of patients after lung transplantation (mild, 31.0%; moderate, 55.2%; severe, 13.8%). Compared with non-vasoplegic patients, vasoplegic patients had a higher incidence of any acute kidney injury, defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria (78.5% vs 65%, P=0.015), renal replacement therapy (47.4% vs 24.5%, P<0.001), and delayed chest closure (18.4% vs 9.2%, P=0.025); were ventilated longer (70 [32-368] vs 34 [19-105] h, P<0.001); and stayed longer in the ICU (12.9 [5-30] vs 6.8 [3-20] days, P<0.001). Mortality at 30 days and 1 yr was higher in patients with vasoplegia (11.2% vs 5.5% and 20.7% vs 11.7%, P=0.039, respectively). Severe vasoplegia represented a predictor of longer-term mortality (hazard ratio=1.65, P=0.008). Underlying infectious disease, increased BMI, higher preoperative pulmonary artery systolic pressure and bilirubin levels, lower glomerular filtration rate, and increased fresh frozen plasma transfusion were predictors of vasoplegia severity. Neutrophilia, leucocytosis, and increased C-reactive protein were associated with vasoplegia, but release of the neutrophil activation markers myeloperoxidase and heparin-binding protein was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Influenced by preoperative status as well as procedural factors and inflammatory response, vasoplegia is a common and critical condition after lung transplantation with worse short-term outcomes and long-term survival.

Recipient Comorbidities for Prediction of Primary Graft Dysfunction, Chronic Allograft Dysfunction and Survival After Lung Transplantation

Since candidates with comorbidities are increasingly referred for lung transplantation, knowledge about comorbidities and their cumulative effect on outcomes is scarce. We retrospectively collected pretransplant comorbidities of all 513 adult recipients transplanted at our center between 1992–2019. Multiple logistic- and Cox regression models, adjusted for donor-, pre- and peri-operative variables, were used to detect independent risk factors for primary graft dysfunction grade-3 at 72 h (PGD3-T72), onset of chronic allograft dysfunction grade-3 (CLAD-3) and survival. An increasing comorbidity burden measured by Charleston-Deyo-Index was a multivariable risk for survival and PGD3-T72, but not for CLAD-3. Among comorbidities, congestive right heart failure or a mean pulmonary artery pressure >25 mmHg were independent risk factors for PGD3-T72 and survival, and a borderline risk for CLAD-3. Left heart failure, chronic atrial fibrillation, arterial hypertension, moderate liver disease, peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux, diabetes with end organ damage, moderate to severe renal disease, osteoporosis, and diverticulosis were also independent risk factors for survival. For PGD3-T72, a BMI>30 kg/m2 was an additional independent risk. Epilepsy and a smoking history of the recipient of >20packyears are additional independent risk factors for CLAD-3. The comorbidity profile should therefore be closely considered for further clinical decision making in candidate selection.

Anesthetic Management During Lung Transplantation - What's New in 2021?

As outcomes of lung transplantation (LTx) are improving transplant centers are pushing boundaries. There has been a steady increase in the medical complexity of lung transplant candidates. Many transplant centers are listing older patients with comorbidities, and there has been a steady rise in the number of candidates supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to transplantation. There has been a growing appreciation of the importance intraoperative management of potentially modifiable risk factors has on postoperative outcomes. Evidence suggests that LTx even in high-risk patients requiring perioperative ECMO can offer excellent results. This article outlines the current state-of-the-art intraoperative management of LTx.

Outcomes following lung re-transplantation in patients with cystic fibrosis

PURPOSE

We examined cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and compared their clinical status at the time of primary versus double lung re-transplantation (re-DLTx) in order to better understand lung retransplant practice patterns.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the UNOS Database identifying CF patients ≥18 years old undergoing re-DLTx (5/4/2005 and 12/4/2020). Baseline and clinical variables at the primary and re-DLTx were compared utilizing the paired student t-test. Graft survival was defined as time from surgery to retransplant and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

277 CF patients who underwent re-DLTx experienced a significantly worse 5-year survival when compared to the primary DLTx cohort (47.9% vs 58.8%, p = 0.00012). The following differences were observed comparing CF re-DLTx group to their primary DLTx: higher LAS score at the time of listing (50.66 vs 42.15, p < 0.001) and transplant (62.19 vs 48.20, p < 0.001), and increase LAS from the time of listing to transplant (+12.22 vs +7.23, p = 0.002). While serum albumin and total bilirubin were similar, CF patients had a higher creatinine (1.05 vs 0.74, p < 0.001), dialysis (4.4% vs 0.6%, p < 0.001), ECMO bridge to transplant rates (7.6% vs 4.0%, p < 0.001), and higher oxygen requirements (5.95 vs 3.93, p < 0.001) at the time of listing for a re-DLTx.

CONCLUSION

Compared to their initial transplant, CF patients experience significant clinical decline in renal, cardiac, and pulmonary function at the time of lung retransplantation. This may indicate that an earlier evaluation and rehabilitation process may be necessary to identify patients earlier for lung retransplantation prior significant clinical decline.

Swallowing and laryngeal complications in lung and heart transplantation: Etiologies and diagnosis

Despite continued surgical advancements in the field of cardiothoracic transplantation, post-operative complications remain a burden for the patient and the multidisciplinary team. Lesser-known complications including swallowing disorders (dysphagia), and voice disorders (dysphonia), are now being reported. Such disorders are known to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality in other medical populations, however their etiology amongst the heart and lung transplant populations has received little attention in the literature. This paper explores the potential mechanisms of oropharyngeal dysphagia and dysphonia following transplantation and discusses optimal modalities of diagnostic evaluation and management. A greater understanding of the implications of swallowing and laryngeal dysfunction in the heart and lung transplant populations is important to expedite early diagnosis and management in order to optimize patient outcomes, minimize allograft injury and improve quality of life.

A pandemic of acute respiratory distress syndrome-role of lung transplant in coronavirus disease-2019-associated respiratory failure

Lung transplantation may be appropriate, and may offer benefit only to a carefully selected subset of morbidly ill patients afflicted by coronavirus disease-2019. Identifying the appropriate recipient for the allocation of scarce resources, by safely navigating through the challenges that are unique to lung transplantation for coronavirus disease-2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome, demands a conscientious and meticulous approach. Categorizing the respiratory failure in coronavirus disease-2019 may facilitate the process of evaluation for the purpose of transplant. The progress in rescue transplants over the past two decades has greatly improved our ability to successfully perform high-risk lung transplantation.

A review of liver dysfunction in the lung transplant patient

Liver dysfunction is an increasingly common finding in patients evaluated for lung transplantation. New or worsening dysfunction in the perioperative period, defined by presence of clinical ascites/encephalopathy, high model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and/or independent diagnostic criteria, is associated with high short- and long-term mortality. Therefore, a thorough liver function assessment is necessary prior to listing for lung transplant. Unfortunately, identification and intraoperative monitoring remain the only options for prevention of disease progression with isolated lung transplantation. Combined lung and liver transplantation may provide an option for definitive long-term management in selecting patients with known liver disease at high risk for postoperative progression. However, experience with the combined operation is extremely limited and indications for combined lung and liver transplant remain unclear. Herein, we present a comprehensive literature review of patients with liver dysfunction undergoing lung transplantation with and without concurrent liver transplant in an effort to illuminate the risks, benefits, and clinical judgement surrounding decision to pursue combined lung-liver transplantation (CLLT). We also argue description of liver function is currently a weakness of the current lung allocation scoring system. Additional algorithms incorporating liver function may aid in risk stratification and decision to pursue combined transplantation.

Lung Transplant Pulmonologists' Views of Specialty Palliative Care for Lung Transplant Recipients

Background: Lung transplant recipients with serious illness may benefit from but rarely receive specialty palliative care (SPC) services. Transplant pulmonologists' views of SPC may be key to understanding SPC utilization but have not been well characterized. Objectives: (1) To understand how transplant pulmonologists view SPC and decide to refer transplant recipients and (2) to identify unique aspects of lung transplantation that may influence referral decisions. Design: We conducted semistructured interviews with transplant pulmonologists at nine geographically diverse high-volume North American transplant centers with SPC services. A multidisciplinary team analyzed interview transcripts using constant comparative methods to inductively develop and refine a coding framework related to SPC views and referral decisions. Results: We interviewed 38 transplant pulmonologists; most (36/38) had referred lung transplant recipients to SPC. Participants described SPC as a medical specialty that aims to improve quality of life and distinguished SPC from hospice care, which was considered end-of-life care. Participants who viewed transplant as a temporary solution (n = 17/38, 45%) described earlier utilization of SPC alongside disease-directed therapies, whereas those who viewed transplant as survival-focused (n = 21/38, 55%) described utilization of SPC after disease-directed therapies were exhausted. Concerns about one-year survival metrics and use of addicting medications for symptom palliation were barriers to referral. Conclusions: Transplant pulmonologists' SPC referral practices may be related to their views of lung transplantation. Optimizing use of SPC in lung transplantation will require improving communication between transplant pulmonology and SPC to ensure a collaborative effort toward patient-centered goals while addressing unique barriers to SPC referral.

Routine deep vein thrombosis screening after lung transplantation: Incidence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) remains a common complication following lung transplantation despite universal routine DVT screening. Moreover, many of the previously reported risk factors are incompletely defined. We sought to explore the influence of DVT screening and to more definitively assess predisposing risk factors.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective, cohort study of 1141 patients undergoing lung transplantation from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2014, was performed evaluating for the rate of DVT. Patients were given prophylactic subcutaneous heparin postoperatively. DVT events were noted if they occurred before 90 days after transplant. We compared DVT rates before and after 2008 when universal screening was implemented. We also evaluated the timing of DVT event and location (above the knee vs below the knee). DVTs were treated with standard anticoagulation therapy or an inferior cava filter when patients were unable to tolerate anticoagulation treatment. Univariable and multivariable models were used to identify risk factors for occurrence. A propensity match was performed to match groups across the eras, and a Cox regression was performed to identify differences in 1-year survival trajectory between cohorts.

RESULTS

The rates of DVT before and after routine screening were 8.8% (36 DVT out of 412 transplants) and 17.3% (126 out of 729 transplants), respectively. These 2 rates were significantly different (P < .01); moreover, the observed DVT incidence per year was not significantly different across the 6 years after universal DVT screening was implemented (P > .90 for all comparisons). Observed DVT incidence at day 0 and day 14 were 3.8% and 3.8%, respectively, for the cohort before DVT protocols were established. Observed DVT incidence for the cohort after protocols were established at the same time points was 8.7% and 3.7%, respectively. Univariable analysis revealed that significant factors associated with a DVT include hypercholesterolemia (odds ratio [OR], 6.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82-26.13; P < .01), the number of days in the intensive care unit (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; P < .01), and the length of stay in the hospital (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01-1.02; P < .01), whereas having quit smoking (vs never smoked) was associated with a decrease in DVT development (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33-0.75; P < .01). Multivariable analysis revealed 2 significant variables: hypercholesterolemia (OR, 8.13; 95% CI, 1.22-54.37; P = .03) and length of stay (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; P < .01). There was a trend for better 1-year survival in the post-2008 era (Exp[β], 1.49; P = .09).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of DVT diagnosis significantly increased after universal DVT screening was implemented. Furthermore, those patients undergoing lung transplantation with extended length of stay and hypercholesterolemia were prone to increased rates of DVT. There was a trend toward better 1-year survival in DVT-screened patients, suggesting DVT screening may result in beneficial outcomes.

Patent foramen ovale repair at the time of double lung transplantation: Necessary or not?

INTRODUCTION

Patient foramen ovale (PFO) is a common and often incidental intraoperative finding during lung transplantation (LTx). We sought to characterize the potential outcomes related to the decision making of whether the PFO was repaired or left unrepaired.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated bilateral LTx recipients between 2005 and 2015 from our prospective database. Incidence of postoperative stoke, 90-day mortality, and overall survival was compared between the PFO-positive and PFO-negative groups, and secondly compared between repaired PFO (rPFO) and non-repaired PFO (nrPFO) groups.

RESULTS

A total of 831 LTx recipients were analyzed: 185 PFO-positive (140 nrPFO, 45 rPFO) and 646 PFO-negative. Study groups were similar with regard to age and comorbidity. The presence of PFO was not associated with a difference in postoperative stroke (P = .89) or 90-day mortality (P = .64). In patients with PFO, intraoperative repair resulted in a lower, but non-significant rate of stroke (0% vs 5%; P = .20) and no difference in mortality (P = .26). As expected, PFO and PFO repair were both associated with a higher incidence of cardiopulmonary bypass utilization, but no difference in pump-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The protective effect of PFO repair remains unclear. However, it is not associated with an increased incidence of stroke or postoperative mortality following LTx.

Fluid Management in Lung Transplant Patients

Overall, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials examining the correlation between fluid volume delivery and outcomes in postoperative lung transplant patients. However, using thoracic surgery patients as a guide, the evidence suggests that hypervolemia correlates with pulmonary edema and should be avoided in lung transplant patients. However, it is recognized that patients with hemodynamic instability may require volume for attenuation of this situation, but it can likely be mitigated with the use of inotropic medication to maintain adequate perfusion and avoid the development of edema.

Influence of early neurological complications on clinical outcome following lung transplant

Background

Neurological complications after lung transplantation are common. The full spectrum of neurological complications and their impact on clinical outcomes has not been extensively studied.

Methods

We investigated the neurological incidence of complications, categorized according to whether they affected the central, peripheral or autonomic nervous systems, in a series of 109 patients undergoing lung transplantation at our center between January 1 2013 and December 31 2014.

Results

Fifty-one patients (46.8%) presented at least one neurological complication. Critical illness polyneuropathy-myopathy (31 cases) and phrenic nerve injury (26 cases) were the two most prevalent complications. These two neuromuscular complications lengthened hospital stays by a median period of 35.5 and 32.5 days respectively. However, neurological complications did not affect patients’ survival.

Conclusions

The real incidence of neurological complications among lung transplant recipients is probably underestimated. They usually appear in the first two months after surgery. Despite not affecting mortality, they do affect the mean length of hospital stay, and especially the time spent in the Intensive Care Unit. We found no risk factor for neurological complications except for long operating times, ischemic time and need for transfusion. It is necessary to develop programs for the prevention and early recognition of these complications, and the prevention of their precipitant and risk factors.

Noteworthy Literature Published in 2016 for Thoracic Organ Transplantation Anesthesiologists

This article is first in the series to review the published literature on perioperative issues in patients undergoing thoracic solid organ transplantations. We present recent literature from 2016 on preoperative considerations, organ preservation, intraoperative anesthesia management, surgical techniques, postoperative complications, and the impact of perioperative management on short- and long-term outcomes that are pertinent to thoracic transplantation anesthesiologists.

Delivering an in-Home Exercise Program via Telerehabilitation: A Pilot Study of Lung Transplant Go (LTGO)

We evaluated the feasibility, safety, system usability, and intervention acceptability of Lung Transplant Go (LTGO), an 8-week in-home exercise intervention for lung transplant recipients using a telerehabilitation platform, and described changes in physical function and physical activity from baseline to post-intervention. The intervention was delivered to lung transplant recipients in their home via the Versatile and Integrated System for TeleRehabilitation (VISYTER). The intervention focused on aerobic and strengthening exercises tailored to baseline physical function. Participants improved walk distance (6-minute walk distance), balance (Berg Balance Scale), lower body strength (30-second chair stand test) and steps walked (SenseWear Armband®). No adverse events were reported. Participants rated the program highly positively in regard to the technology and intervention. The telerehabilitation exercise program was feasible, safe, and acceptable. Our findings provide preliminary support for the LTGO intervention to improve physical function and promote physical activity in lung transplant recipients.