Fate of uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection and impact of concurrent aortic dilatation on remote aortic events

Trends and Updates in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection

Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) presents a complex clinical challenge requiring coordinated, multidisciplinary care to optimize patient outcomes. While rapid intervention is crucial for complicated TBAD, the optimal management of uncomplicated cases remains less well-defined. Historically, uncomplicated TBAD was managed medically, but recent years have seen a shift toward selective interventional approaches. Updated American and European guidelines now recommend thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for high-risk, uncomplicated cases, characterized by factors including a large aortic diameter, large entry tears, or persistent pain. Observations from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection highlight a significant shift toward endovascular management and reduced mortality over time. The acute dissection stentgraft or best medical treatment and investigation of stent grafts in aortic dissection trials suggested that pre-emptive TEVAR may benefit certain high-risk patients by promoting favorable aortic remodeling. However, routine use of TEVAR in all uncomplicated cases is presently still controversial due to risks such as stroke and spinal cord ischemia, which emphasize the importance of careful patient selection. Current evidence supports a tailored approach that integrates clinical and imaging risk factors to identify patients most likely to benefit from pre-emptive TEVAR. In addition, ongoing randomized controlled trials, including IMPROVE-AD, SUNDAY, and EARNEST, will hopefully provide critical data on the risks and benefits of TEVAR in uncomplicated TBAD. Moving forward, interdisciplinary collaboration among different medical and engineering specialties, and refined risk stratification will be essential to advance TBAD management, enhancing outcomes for both complicated and uncomplicated cases.

A prediction model to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with acute type B aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Acute type B aortic dissection (ABAD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular disease. A practicable and effective prediction model to predict and evaluate the risk of in-hospital death for ABAD is required. The present study aimed to construct a prediction model to predict the risk of in-hospital death in ABAD patients.

METHODS

A total of 715 patients with ABAD were recruited in the first affiliated hospital of Xinjiang medical university from April 2012 to May 2021. The information on the demographic and clinical characteristics of all subjects was collected. The logistic regression analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and nomogram were applied to screen the appropriate predictors and to establish a prediction model for the risk of in-hospital mortality in ABAD. The receiver operator characteristic curve and calibration plot were applied to validate the performance of the prediction model.

RESULTS

Of 53 (7.41%) subjects occurred in-hospital death in 715 ABAD patients. The variables including diastolic blood pressure (DBP), platelets, heart rate, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, D-dimer, C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC), hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), procalcitonin, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were shown a significant difference between the in-hospital death group and the in-hospital survival group (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, all these factors which existed differences, except CRP, were associated with in-hospital deaths in ABAD patients (all P < 0.05). Then, parameters containing LVEF, WBC, hemoglobin, LDH, and procalcitonin were identified as independent risk factors for in-hospital deaths in ABAD patients by adjusting compound variables (all P < 0.05). In addition, these independent factors were qualified as predictors to build a prediction model (AUC > 0.5, P < 0.05). The prediction model was shown a favorable discriminative ability (C index = 0.745) and demonstrated good consistency.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel prediction model combined with WBC, hemoglobin, LDH, procalcitonin, and LVEF, was a practicable and valuable tool to predict in-hospital deaths in ABAD patients.

Prediction of preoperative in-hospital mortality rate in patients with acute aortic dissection by machine learning: a two-centre, retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a comprehensive analysis of demographic information, medical history, and blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) variability during hospitalisation so as to establish a predictive model for preoperative in-hospital mortality of patients with acute aortic dissection (AD) by using machine learning techniques.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Data were collected from the electronic records and the databases of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between 2004 and 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

380 inpatients diagnosed with acute AD were included in the study.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Preoperative in-hospital mortality rate.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients (14.47%) died in the hospital before surgery. The results of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, decision curve analysis and calibration curves indicated that the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model had the highest accuracy and robustness. According to the SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis of the XGBoost model, Stanford type A, maximum aortic diameter >5.5 cm, high variability in HR, high variability in diastolic BP and involvement of the aortic arch had the greatest impact on the occurrence of in-hospital deaths before surgery. Moreover, the predictive model can accurately predict the preoperative in-hospital mortality rate at the individual level.

CONCLUSION

In the current study, we successfully constructed machine learning models to predict the preoperative in-hospital mortality of patients with acute AD, which can help identify high-risk patients and optimise the clinical decision-making. Further applications in clinical practice require the validation of these models using a large-sample, prospective database.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1900025818.

Prognostic value of interleukin-33, sST2, myeloperoxidase, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in acute aortic dissection

Background and purpose

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency. Both neutrophil granzyme and interleukin (IL)-33/ST2 systems have proven to be effective diagnostic markers for AAD. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between plasma IL-33, soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 (sST2), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 levels at admission and all-cause mortality in patients with AAD.

Methods

A total of 155 patients with AAD were enrolled from the Prospective Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain (PEACP) study. Plasma concentrations of IL-33, sST2, and MMP-9 were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and MPO was detected using a chemiluminescence immunoassay. Aortic anatomical parameters were measured using CT radiography. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality rate.

Results

The median age of the patients was 55 years, and 96 (61.9%) were diagnosed with type A-AAD. After adjusting for confounding factors, the highest tertiles of IL-33, sST2, MPO, and MMP-9 had hazard risks of 0.870 (95% CI: 0.412-1.836, P = 0.714), 3.769 (95% CI: 1.504-9.446, P = 0.005), 4.689 (95% CI: 1.985-11.076, P < 0.001), and 4.748 (95% CI: 1.763-12.784, P = 0.002), respectively, compared to the lowest tertile. Pearson's correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between these markers (P < 0.001). Moreover, sST2, MPO, and MMP-9 levels had a significant positive correlation with aortic diameter and pseudolumen area (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The biomarkers sST2, MPO, and MMP-9 were independently associated with mortality in patients with AAD. The significant correlation between these biomarkers suggests a pathogenic role for the IL-33/ST2/neutrophil granzyme system in patients with AAD.

Aortic arch surgery for type B aortic dissection: How far should we go? The value of a hybrid approach

Traditionally, the management of type B aortic dissection has been the domain of the vascular surgeons. Timing and type of intervention still generate debate. We sought to review our early experience with the treatment of this condition based on a hybrid approach following an aortic multi-disciplinary team meeting involving close cooperation between cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, vascular anesthetists, and cardiac anesthetists. Four patients (age 41-56 years; 3 males; 1 female) with type B aortic dissection underwent aortic arch surgery through a hybrid approach: one elective procedure consisting of ascending aorta and hemi-arch replacement with debranching followed by thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR); one redo procedure requiring aortic arch replacement with hybrid frozen elephant trunk; two acute presentations (aortic arch replacement and debranching followed by TEVAR; AVR with ascending aorta, arch, and proximal descending thoracic aorta replacement with conventional elephant trunk and debranching). Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was required in three patients. Despite respiratory complications and slightly prolonged postoperative course, all patients survived without onset of stroke, paraplegia, malperfusion, endoleak, or need for re-exploration. Follow-up remains satisfactory. Different factors may affect outcome following complex aortic procedures. Nevertheless, close cooperation between cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, and interventional radiologists may reduce potential for complications and address aspects that may not be completely within the domain of individual specialists.

Use of Anti-Thrombotic Drugs and In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Aortic Dissection Patients

Acute aortic dissection occurs due to a primary tear in the aortic intima, with blood from the aortic lumen entering the adjacent diseased media. In the clinical setting, practitioners often hesitate before the use of anti-thrombotic drugs in the acute phase of aortic dissection. Therefore, we examined the clinical course in patients who had already received antithrombotic therapies at the onset of acute aortic dissection, and who were given anti-thrombotic drugs in the acute phase during hospitalization. We retrospectively enrolled 685 consecutive patients with acute aortic dissection (type A/B: 454/231), who were transferred to Kurume University Hospital from 2004 to 2020. In types A and B, there were no significant differences between in-hospital mortality with or without antithrombotic therapies at the onset (14.3% vs. 16.4%, p = 0.66 in type A, 2.6% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.29 in type B). Patients in type A who survived more than a day and were treated with anti-thrombotic drugs during hospitalization had significantly lower in-hospital mortality compared with those who received no anti-thrombotic drugs in the acute phase (2.2% vs. 16.1%, p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference between in-hospital mortality in the two type-B groups (2.4% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.48). Although there were variations in response among patients with acute aortic dissection, anti-thrombotic drugs did not worsen in-hospital mortality for patients with acute aortic dissection, indicating that medical staff should not hesitate to administer anti-thrombotic drugs if indicated.

Influence of nocturnal hypoxemia on follow-up course after type B acute aortic syndrome

Introduction

Association between sleep nocturnal breathing disorders and acute aortic syndrome (AAS) has been described but mid-term data are scarce.

Objectives

We assessed the prognostic value of sleep apnea parameters and their relationship with aortic morphology after the onset of a type B AAS.

Methods

Between January 2010 and January 2018, sleep apnea screening in post type B AAS was prospectively performed. The association of sleep apnea parameters with aortic morphology and aortic expansion during follow-up was studied.

Results

Over the 8-year-study period, 103 patients were included, with a mean age of 57.8 ± 12.1 years old. Median follow-up was 25.0 months (11.0–51.0). Thirty-two patients (31%) required aortic stenting during the acute phase. In patients treated by aortic stenting, the descending thoracic aortic diameter was positively associated with a higher percentage of nocturnal time of saturation ≤ 90% after adjustment (p = 0.016). During follow-up, the nocturnal time of saturation ≤ 90% in patients treated by medical therapy was the only parameter associated with significant aortic expansion rate (r = 0.26, p = 0.04). Thirty-eight patients started and sustained nocturnal ventilation during follow-up. The association between aortic expansion rate and nocturnal time of saturation ≤ 90% did not persist during follow-up after adjustment on nocturnal ventilation initiation (r = 0.25, p = 0.056).

Conclusions

Nocturnal hypoxemia parameters are positively associated with the max onset aortic diameter and significant aortic growth after type B AAS. Nocturnal ventilation seems to mitigate aortic expansion during follow-up.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-021-01778-y.

Descending Aorta Diameters as Predictor of Late Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

A subset of patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD) has been shown to possess higher risk of experiencing late adverse outcomes. Therefore, we conducted an analysis to investigate the role of descending aorta diameters, including total descending aorta diameter and false lumen diameter, as predictor of late adverse outcomes in patients with uTBAD.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed through Pubmed, ClinicalKey, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. Our primary outcome was the composite late adverse events following their first episode of hospitalization. All meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager version 5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 2,339 (male 68.8%) patients from a total of 15 cohorts were included in our analysis. During follow-up period, there were 655 (27.3%) and 149 (6.3%) cases of late adverse events and mortality, respectively. Patients with higher initial descending aorta diameter were at higher risk of developing late adverse events (RR 2.99 [2.60, 3.44]; P < 0.001) and mortality (RR 3.15 [2.34, 4.25]; P <0.001) throughout follow-up period. Maximum false lumen diameter at the initial presentation seemed to significantly be associated with late adverse events (RR 1.87 [1.46, 2.39]; P <0.001) but not with mortality (RR 2.55 [0.81-8.00; P = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Descending aorta diameters, particularly maximum initial descending aorta diameter, is a good and helpful predictor of late adverse outcomes in patients with uTBAD.

Predictors of adverse events in uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review with meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) has been selectively used for uncomplicated acute type B Aortic Dissection (TBAD); however, not all cases will benefit from TEVAR. A search for high risk clinical and radiographic predictors for complications is ongoing. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify predictors of major adverse events during follow-up of uncomplicated TBAD, in order to identify who might benefit from elective TEVAR.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

16 studies were included in a qualitative synthesis and 10 in the meta-analysis. Several risk factors associated to major adverse events have been described, including (1) aortic diameter ≥40 mm, (2) greater false lumen diameter (>22mm), (3) patent false lumen, (4) primary entry tear > 10mm, and (5) greater number of false lumen vessels origin. Quantitative synthesis identified an aortic diameter ≥40 mm significantly associated with major adverse events (HR=3.56; p<0.00001). Reporting of false lumen status, aortic diameters and growth, and demographic data was not always congruent with the most recent recommendations by Society for Vascular Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons, published in 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute and subacute patients with uncomplicated TBAD presenting with an aortic diameter ≥ 40 mm and solely treated with BMT have an increased hazard of developing major adverse events (HR), making them potential candidates for TEVAR. Remaining risk factors analysed have weaker evidence.