Safety and feasibility of esophagectomy following combined immunotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Influence of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy-Chemotherapy on Perioperative Outcomes in Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the perioperative outcomes for patients who had locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) and chemotherapy versus a matched cohort of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone.

METHODS

A single-center non-randomized phase 2 trial was undertaken with locally advanced (cT3-4 and/or N+) EAC, and 49 patients completed neoadjuvant avelumab + docetaxel, cisplatin, 5FU (DCF) and esophagectomy between February 2018 and February 2020. These patients were matched with contemporary patients (January 2018 to June 2020) who met the inclusion criteria but received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (NAC) with a comparable docetaxel-based therapy. The postoperative outcomes then were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

For this study, 99 patients with locally advanced EAC underwent esophagectomy and met the enrolment criteria. Of these patients, 50 received NAC alone and 49 received IO + NAC. Baseline characteristics such as age, gender, and clinical stage were comparable between the two groups. Operative approach and rate of minimally invasive esophagectomy (~ 60%) were similar in the two groups. For the NAC-alone and IO + NAC groups, the respective overall and major complication rates were similar between the two groups (50% vs. 51% [p = 0.91] and 20% vs. 26% [p = 0.44], respectively), with concordant rates for anastomotic leak (6 [12%] vs. 6 [12%]; p = 0.86) and respiratory complications (13 [26%] vs. 11 [22%]; p = 0.68). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of hospital length of stay or 30- and 90-day mortality rates.

CONCLUSION

The addition of immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma does not appear to alter perioperative short-term outcomes significantly after esophagectomy.

The safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy following laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicentre real-world clinical study

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remain controversial.

METHODS

Patients with LAGC who received either nICT or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) at 3 tertiary referral teaching hospitals in China between January 2016 and October 2022 were analyzed. After propensity-score matching (PSM), comparing the radiological response, pathological response rate, perioperative outcomes, and early recurrence between the two groups.

RESULTS

After PSM, 585 patients were included, with 195 and 390 patients comprising the nICT and nCT groups, respectively. The nICT group exhibited a higher objective response rate (79.5% vs. 59.0%; P <0.001), pathological complete response rate (14.36% vs. 6.41%; P =0.002) and major pathological response rate (39.49% vs. 26.15%; P =0.001) compared with the nCT group. The incidence of surgical complications (17.44% vs. 16.15%, P =0.694) and the proportion of perioperative textbook outcomes (80.0% vs. 81.0%; P =0.767) were similar in both groups. The nICT group had a significantly lower proportion of early recurrence than the nCT group (29.7% vs. 40.8%; P =0.047). Furthermore, the multivariable logistic analysis revealed that immunotherapy was an independent protective factor against early recurrence [odds ratio 0.62 (95% CI 0.41-0.92); P =0.018]. No significant difference was found in neoadjuvant therapy drug toxicity between the two groups (51.79% vs. 45.38%; P =0.143).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with nCT, nICT is safe and effective, which significantly enhanced objective and pathological response rates and reduced the risk for early recurrence among patients with LAGC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials.gov.

Real-world retrospective study of anti-PD-1 antibody in combination with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment strategy for locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Neoadjuvant therapy has become a mainstay of treatment for locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer. The objective of this research was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in treating surgically removable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

From January 1, 2016 to April 1, 2023, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with resectable esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. The primary endpoints of this study were pathologic complete response (pCR), major pathologic response (MPR) and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints of this study were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety.

Results

A total of 122 patients with ESCC receiving neoadjuvant immune-chemotherapy (nICT) were included. Fifty-four patients achieved partial response (PR) and two patients achieved complete response (CR), with an ORR of 45.9%. Of the 106 patients who underwent surgery, a total of 28 patients achieved pCR (26.4%) and a total of 37 patients achieved MPR (34.9%). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 26 patients (21.3%). The most common postoperative complication was pneumonitis (25.5%).

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy demonstrates satisfactory efficacy in the treatment of locally advanced ESCC, with manageable treatment-related adverse events and postoperative complications.

The Role of Immunotherapy in the Management of Esophageal Cancer in Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network advises neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for locally advanced cases of esophageal cancer. The role of immunotherapy in this context is under heavy investigation.

METHODS

Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2019. Three groups were generated as follows: (a) no immunotherapy, (b) neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and (c) adjuvant immunotherapy. Overall survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard analysis, adjusting for previously described risk factors for mortality.

RESULTS

Of the total 14,244 patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, 14,065 patients did not receive immunotherapy, 110 received neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and 69 received adjuvant immunotherapy. When adjusting for established risk factors, adjuvant immunotherapy was associated with significantly improved survival compared to no immunotherapy and neoadjuvant immunotherapy during a median follow-up period of 35.2 months. No difference was noted among patients who received no immunotherapy vs. neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the same model.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis of the NCDB, receiving adjuvant immunotherapy offered a significant survival advantage compared to no immunotherapy and neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The addition of neoadjuvant immunotherapy to patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation did not improve survival in this cohort. Further studies are warranted to investigate the long-term outcomes of immunotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Immunotherapy for Resectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The current standard of care for locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers includes neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy with surgical resection; however, disease-free survival in these patients remains poor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved for adjuvant treatment of locally advanced esophageal and GEJ cancers, but their benefit in the perioperative and neoadjuvant settings remains under investigation.

METHODS

We used the PubMed online database to conduct a literature search to identify studies that investigated immunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal and GEJ carcinoma. A review of ClinicalTrials.gov yielded a list of ongoing trials.

RESULTS

Adjuvant nivolumab for residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery is the only approved immunotherapy regimen for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Early-phase trials investigating the addition of neoadjuvant or perioperative ICIs to standard-of-care multimodality approaches have observed pathologic complete response rates as high as 60%. Response rates are highest for ICIs plus chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and dual checkpoint inhibition in mismatch repair-deficient adenocarcinomas. Safety profiles are acceptable, with a pooled adverse event rate of 27%. Surgical morbidity and mortality with immunotherapy are similar to historical controls with no immunotherapy, and R0 resection rates are high. When reported, disease-free survival among patients treated with perioperative immunotherapy is promising.

CONCLUSIONS

Outside of clinical trials, immunotherapy for resectable esophageal carcinoma is limited to the adjuvant setting. Phase III trials investigating neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapy are now underway and will provide much-needed data on survival that may ultimately lead to practice-changing recommendations.

Safety and short-term outcomes of esophagectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer: analysis of two phase-II clinical trials

Background

Preoperative chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) show survival benefits in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); however, ESCC patients still have a dismal prognosis. We conducted two phase-II, single-armed clinical trials to assess the potential benefits, efficacy, feasibility, and safety of esophagectomy after combining preoperative CT or CRT and neoadjuvant programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in the treatment of ESCC.

Methods

Patients were included with histologically confirmed ESCC (clinical stage II-IVA according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system) from two phase-II, single-arm trials (NCT04506138 and NCT03940001). Patients underwent two doses of intravenous PD-1 inhibitor (either camrelizumab or sintilimab) every 3 weeks, combined with two cycles of either CT or CRT. The primary endpoint of the study was the safety and short-term outcomes of esophagectomy as measured by the risk of developing complications within 30 days, after the combination of preoperative PD-1 inhibitor and CT or CRT Secondary endpoint was to evaluate the pCR rates (pT0N0), primary tumor pCR rates (pT0), operation time, postoperative stay, and 30-day mortality rate between both groups. Results between both groups were compared using a multivariable log-binomial regression model to obtain the adjusted relative risk ratios (RRs).

Results

Between May 2019 and June 2022, 55 patients were included. All patients completed neoadjuvant therapy. Age, sex, performance status, clinical stage, histologic subtype, procedure type, operative time, and blood loss volume were similar between the two groups. The primary tumor pCR rates were 52.9% in the nICRT group and 21.6% in the nICT group (P=0.03), while the postoperative pCR rates were 41.2% in the nICRT group and 21.6% in the nICT group (P=0.19). The minimally invasive surgery rates were 89.2% (33/37) in the nICT group and 94.1% (16/17) in the nICRT group. The risk of developing pulmonary, anastomotic, or other complications were similar between the two groups.

Conclusions

Esophagectomy was safe after the addition of the PD-1 inhibitor to preoperative CT or CRT in ESCC neoadjuvant therapies. Follow-up and the exploratory endpoints, including biomarkers analyses, are ongoing.

Prognostic implication of UBE2C + CD8 + T cell in neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade plus chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with esophageal cancer (EC) has gained substantial attention. This study aimed to investigate the early and mid-term outcome of neoadjuvant ICBs plus chemotherapy and discover immune-associated predictors of major pathological response (MPR) for locally advanced EC.

METHOD

Patients with locally advanced EC who received neoadjuvant ICBs plus chemotherapy were retrospectively included between June 2019 to December 2021. Conjoint analysis of Bulk-RNA seq (GSE165252) and scRNA seq (GSE188900) were used to investigate potential prognostic factors and immunological mechanisms, then multiplexed immunofluorescence was applied to validate.

RESULTS

76 patients were included. A total of 21 (27.6 %) patients achieved MPR, with 13 (17.1 %) attaining a pathological complete response. Over a median follow-up of 1.8 years, 6 (7.9 %) patients died and 21 (27.6 %) experienced disease recurrence within 0.6 to 2.1 years after surgery. The overall survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate were 93.3 + 2.9 % and 84.8 + 4.2 % at 12 months, 90.8 + 3.7 % and 67.1 + 6.4 % at 24 months, and 90.8 + 3.7 % and 62.9 + 7.2 % at 36 months, respectively. Patients achieving MPR had a significantly lower risk of recurrence compared to non-responders (9.5 % vs 34.5 %, P = 0.017). Analysis of bulk-RNA seq and scRNA-seq revealed that UBE2C and UBE2C + CD8 + T cells were adverse prognostic factors. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that the non-MPR group had a higher infiltration of UBE2C + immune cells than MPR group after neoadjuvant treatment. Multiplexed immunofluorescence confirmed that infiltrating UBE2C + CD8 + T cells in MPR group were significantly fewer than non-MPR group after neoadjuvant treatment, indicating their poor prognostic role for EC.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant ICBs plus chemotherapy shows promising efficacy in locally advanced EC, with MPR being a significant predictor of lower recurrence risk. Immunological analyses identified UBE2C + CD8 + T cells as adverse prognostic factors, suggesting their potential as biomarkers for patient stratification and treatment response.

A Correlation Evaluation Between the Peripheral Blood Index and the Prognosis of Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Camrelizumab

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between peripheral blood indices and the efficacy and prognosis of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with camrelizumab.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 64 patients who received camrelizumab for advanced ESCC at the Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang City between July 2020 and June 2022. The study included examination of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the systemic inflammation index (SII), the lymph-to-monocytes ratio (LMR), the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to explore the link existing between peripheral blood and the efficacy of treatment. Determination of potential prognostic factors for Progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS) using Cox regression analysis. The nomogram model was developed based on the results of the Cox multivariate analysis. Patients were divided into three groups according to the reduction in LDH and LDL levels before treatment, and the Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the three groups were compared and ROC curves for LDH combined with PLR were plotted.

Results

Lower LDH (OR=6.237, 95% CI: 1.625-23.944) were independently associated with disease control rates(DCR). LDH was independently correlated with PFS (HR: 0.227 95% CI: 0.099-0.517). LDH and PLR were independently linked to OS. The C index of the nomogram model is 0.819, indicating good predictive performance. Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve suggested better OS in patients with reduced pretreatment LDH and PLR. The area under the ROC curve showed that the LDH index combined with the PLR index predicts patient survival better than the index alone.

Conclusion

LDH combined with PLR predicted prognosis in patients with ESCC treated with camrelizumab.

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and nedaplatin for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Objective: This research aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (PBL) combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel (ab-Pac) and nedaplatin (NDP) for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: A total of 47 ESCC patients were administered PBL or NDP on day 1 and ab-Pac on days 1 and 8, every 21 days for one cycle. Tumor and toxicities were evaluated every two cycles and every cycle, respectively. Results: The objective response rate was 68.1% and the disease control rate was 100%. The median follow-up was 16.7 months; median progression-free and overall survival were 12.6 and 19.9 months, respectively. Conclusion: The combination of PBL with ab-Pac and NDP proved to be an effective and safe treatment regimen for advanced ESCC.

Perioperative Risk Factors for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Background

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are the most prevalent complication after esophagectomy and are associated with a worse prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the perioperative risk factors for PPCs after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).

Methods

Seven hundred and sixty-seven consecutive patients who underwent McKeown MIE via thoracoscopy and laparoscopy were retrospectively studied. Patient characteristics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results

The incidence of PPCs after MIE was 25.2% (193/767). Univariate analysis identified age (odds ratio [OR] 1.022, P = 0.044), male sex (OR 2.955, P < 0.001), pulmonary comorbidities (OR 1.746, P = 0.032), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR 2.821, P = 0.003), former smoking status (OR 1.880, P = 0.001), postoperative albumin concentration (OR 0.941, P = 0.007), postoperative creatinine concentration (OR 1.011, P = 0.019), and perioperative transfusion (OR 2.250, P = 0.001) as risk factors for PPCs. In multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for PPCs were male sex (OR 3.135, P < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.088, P = 0.002), COPD (OR 2.480, P = 0.012), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (OR 2.057, P = 0.035), postoperative albumin concentration (OR 0.929, P = 0.002), and perioperative transfusion (OR 1.939, P = 0.013). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the predictive model generated by multivariate logistic regression analysis was 0.671 (95% confidence interval 0.628-0.713).

Conclusions

Male sex, BMI, COPD, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, postoperative albumin concentration, and perioperative transfusion were independent predictors of PPCs after MIE.

Present situation and prospect of immunotherapy for unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer during peri-radiotherapy

Four major studies (Checkmate577, Keynote-590, Checkmate649 and Attraction-4) of locally advanced esophageal cancer published in 2020 have established the importance of immunotherapy, represented by anti-programmed death protein (PD)-1 in postoperative adjuvant treatment and advanced first-line treatment of locally advanced or advanced esophageal cancer and esophagogastric junction cancer, from the aspects of proof of concept, long-term survival, overall survival rate and progression-free survival. For unresectable or inoperable nonmetastatic esophageal cancer, concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy is the standard treatment recommended by various guidelines. Because its curative effect is still not ideal, it is necessary to explore radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the future, and it is considered to be promising to combine them with immunotherapeutic drugs such as anti-PD-1. This paper mainly discusses how to combine radical concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy with immunotherapy for unresectable local advanced esophageal cancer.

Evolving Perspectives on Esophagectomy Care: Clinical Update

Recent changes in perioperative care have led to new perspectives and important advances that have helped to improve outcomes among patients treated with esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

The Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of positive lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We conducted a systematic search of relevant literature published until April 2022 in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The primary and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), with corresponding hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The included studies were subgrouped based on age, study area, adjuvant therapy, sensitivity analysis, and assessment of publication bias. We analyzed and discussed the results.

RESULTS

We included 21 studies with 29 cohorts and 11,849 patients. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale scores of the included studies were no less than six, indicating high research quality. The combined results of HR and 95% CI showed that patients with esophageal cancer with a lower LNR had better OS (HR, 2.58; 95% CI, 2.15-3.11; P < 0.001) and DFS (HR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.85-5.10; P < 0.001). The subgroup analysis suggested that geographic region, age, and adjuvant therapy affected OS. When any cohort was excluded, no significant changes were observed in the pooled HR of the OS group, indicating reliable and robust results. Egger's and Begg's tests showed no potential publication bias in the studies that used OS as an outcome measurement index, indicating reliable results. Sensitivity analyses and assessments of publication bias (<10) were not performed because of an insufficient number of DFS studies.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a lower positive LNR had a higher survival rate, suggesting that positive LNR may be a promising predictor of EC prognosis in esophageal cancer. After radical resection of esophageal cancer, the ratio of the number of dissected lymph nodes to the number of positive lymph nodes in patients with esophageal cancer should be considered to accurately evaluate the prognosis.

Opportunities and challenges in combining immunotherapy and radiotherapy in esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has shown promise in the treatment of esophageal cancer, but using it alone only benefits a small number of patients. Most patients either do not have a significant response or develop secondary drug resistance. The combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy appears to be a promising approach to treating esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE

We reviewed milestone clinical trials of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for esophageal cancer. We then discussed potential biomarkers for radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy, including programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status, tumor mutation burden (TMB), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, ct-DNA, imaging biomarkers, and clinical factors. Furthermore, we emphasize the key mechanisms of radiation therapy-induced immune stimulation and immune suppression in order to propose strategies for overcoming immune resistance in radiation therapy (RT). Lastly, we discussed the emerging role of low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) , which has become a promising approach to overcome the limitations of high-dose radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy can be considered a triggering factor for systemic anti-tumor immune response and, with the assistance of immunotherapy, can serve as a systemic treatment option and potentially become the standard treatment for cancer patients.

Progenitor-like exhausted SPRY1+CD8+ T cells potentiate responsiveness to neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) demonstrates promise in operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but lacks available efficacy biomarkers. Here, we perform single-cell RNA-sequencing of tumors from patients with ESCC undergoing neoadjuvant ICB, revealing a subset of exhausted CD8+ T cells expressing SPRY1 (CD8+ Tex-SPRY1) that displays a progenitor exhausted T cell (Tpex) phenotype and correlates with complete response to ICB. We validate CD8+ Tex-SPRY1 cells as an ICB-specific predictor of improved response and survival using independent ICB-/non-ICB cohorts and demonstrate that expression of SPRY1 in CD8+ T cells enforces Tpex phenotype and enhances ICB efficacy. Additionally, CD8+ Tex-SPRY1 cells contribute to proinflammatory phenotype of macrophages and functional state of B cells, which thereby promotes antitumor immunity by enhancing CD8+ T cell effector functions. Overall, our findings unravel progenitor-like CD8+ Tex-SPRY1 cells' role in effective responses to ICB for ESCC and inform mechanistic biomarkers for future individualized immunotherapy.

Update of latest data for combined therapy for esophageal cancer using radiotherapy and immunotherapy: A focus on efficacy, safety, and biomarkers

Esophageal cancer usually has a poor prognosis. Given the significant breakthrough with tumor immunotherapy, an increasing number of clinical studies have demonstrated that the combination of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may have a synergistic effect and good outcome in esophageal cancer. Clinical studies of immunoradiotherapy (iRT) for esophageal cancer have proliferated enormously from 2021 to the present. However, a summary of the efficacy and toxicity of combined therapy to guide esophageal cancer treatment in clinical practice is lacking. For this review, we integrate the latest data to analyze and assess the efficacy and safety of iRT for esophageal cancer. In addition, we discuss better predictive biomarkers, therapeutic options for specific populations, and other challenges to identify directions for future research design.

Integrative analysis of tertiary lymphoid structures and immune microenvironment in patients with esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most common upper gastrointestinal malignancies worldwide. Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are tumor-infiltrating immune cells aggregates coupled with stromal cells which are similar to secondary lymphoid organs. The objective of this study is to explore the predictive effects of two common genes associated with TLS models on prognosis and immunotherapy effects in ESCC patients.

METHODS

Clinical information for ESCC patients in the TCGA(The Cancer Genome Altas) cohort and GSE 53625 were collected. All of the samples were classified as either high score group or low score group based on two TLS signatures, and the association between TLS signatures and survival, clinical indicators, genomic burden, stemness indices analysis, tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy response were performed. Furthermore, the mature TLS was also assessed in ESCC tissue microarray.

RESULTS

In our study, we quantified the score of TLS_9 and TLS_12, respectively, reflecting the different statuses of TLS (TLS_9 = B and T cells in TLSs; TLS_12 = neogenesis of TLSs). Subsequently, we explored the effect of TLS score on ESCC tumor microenvironment quantified by multiple algorithms. We found that a correlation analysis indicated that TLS_9 and TLS_12 were all positively correlated with CD8+ T cell, NK cells, CD4+ T cells, M1 macrophages and so on. Meanwhile, some cells present a different correlation pattern of TLS_9 and TLS_12, including activated CD4+ memory T cells and Tgd cells. Immune-related analysis revealed that the TLS_12 and TLS_9 scores were all positively correlated with immune dysfunction, yet negatively correlated with immune exclusion. Following this, the biological roles of TLS_9 and TLS_12 scores were investigated. Also, we noticed that the TLS score could significantly affect the CAFs infiltration and be associated with the genomic burden and tumor stemness. In addition, we explored the prognostic value of mature TLS through tissue microarray (TMA). Our result displayed ESCC patients with the presence of mature TLS had a better prognosis than ESCC patients without it.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicated that ESCC patients with the presence of TLS had better outcomes and an inflamed immune microenvironment. In addition, both TLS-9 and TLS-12 gene signatures could be used as potential biomarkers for the immunotherapy of ESCC patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with or without radio(chemo)therapy for locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and prognostic factors for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with or without radio(chemo)therapy and to evaluate their toxicity in patients with locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA/RM ESCC).

METHODS

In this study, 198 patients with locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic (LA/RM) ESCC who received ICIs combined with or without radiotherapy/chemotherapy in the Department of Radiotherapy of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). The factors affecting treatment response and the occurrences of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median OS and PFS were 30.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.1-45.7 months) and 15.3 months (95% CI 12.8-17.8 months), respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the number of ICI cycles, the intervention of radiotherapy and dysphagia were independent factors affecting OS (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39, 2.043 and 0.365, respectively; P = 0.018, 0.001 and 0.032, respectively). The intervention of radiotherapy was an independent factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 18.149, P = 0.013). The median OS and PFS for patients who had complete response and partial response (Objective response, ORR) were 50.8 months (95% CI 25.8-75.7 months) and 20.5 months (95% CI 14.1-27.0), respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the non-ORR group (OSnon-ORR:17.5 months, 95% CI 14.0-21.0; χ2 = 13.881, P < 0.001; PFSnon-ORR: 12.1 months, 95% CI 10.1-14.1, χ2 = 10.676, P = 0.001). The intervention of radiotherapy could improve treatment response (χ2 = 47.725, P = 0.000). In entire study population, 83 patients (41.9%) had ≥ grade 2 trAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

ICIs combined with radiotherapy/chemotherapy are safe and effective in LA/RM ESCC patients. Intervention of radiotherapy, the number of immunotherapy cycles and occurrence of dysphagia affecting the overall survival of LR/RM ESCC patients. Intervention of radiotherapy was an independent prognosis factor for OS and PFS and associated with better treatment response.

Durvalumab and PET-Directed Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase Ib/II Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and efficacy of adding the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab to induction FOLFOX and preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant induction FOLFOX followed by positron emission tomography (PET) directed chemoradiation has demonstrated improved survival for esophageal adenocarcinoma. There is clear benefit now for the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors both in early and advanced stage disease. Given these results we investigated the safety and efficacy of adding durvalumab to induction FOLFOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma received PET-directed chemoradiation with durvalumab before esophagectomy. Patients who had R0 resections received adjuvant durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks for 6 treatments. The primary endpoint of the study was pathologic complete response.

RESULTS

We enrolled 36 patients, 33 of whom completed all preoperative treatment and underwent surgery. Preoperative treatment was well tolerated, with no delays to surgery nor new safety signals. Pathologic complete response was identified in 8 [22% (1-sided 90% lower bound: 13.3%)] patients with major pathologic response in 22 [61% (1-sided 90% lower bound: 50%)] patients. Twelve and 24-month overall survival was 92% and 85%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of durvalumab to induction FOLFOX and PET-directed chemoradiotherapy before surgery is safe, with a high rate of pathologic response, as well as encouraging survival data.

Comparison of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Purpose

This study compares the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (NICT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) combined with radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC).

Patients and Methods

Patients with locally advanced ESCC treated with NICT or NCRT combined with esophagectomy between March 2016 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and propensity score matched (PSM) in a 1:2 ratio to balance potential bias.

Results

After PSM, 110 patients who received NCRT and 55 patients who received NICT were selected for the final analysis. The probability of tumor regression grade 0 and the rate of pathological complete remission (pCR) were significantly higher in the NCRT group than in the NICT group (57.3% vs 32.7%, P=0.003 and 48.2% vs 29.1%, P=0.030, respectively). The incidence of postoperative complications in the NCRT group was not significantly different from that in the NICT group (P=0.082). Patients in the NCRT group had significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) than those in the NICT group (12-month DFS rate: 94.3% vs 81.8%, P=0.006; 12-month OS rate: 100.0% vs 95.4%, P=0.032). However, the results of the 24-month follow-up showed that there was also a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups. Patients with postoperative pCR had a longer DFS (P< 0.001).

Conclusion

Short-term follow-up results show that NCRT has a significantly better pathologic response and prognosis than NICT in the treatment of patients with locally advanced ESCC. NCRT and NICT have similar safety profiles.

Additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy does not increase the risk of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nICT) is a novel and promising therapy model for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.The objective of this study aimed to assessed the impact of additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy on patients' short-term outcomes, particularly the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) and pathological response.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT)/ nICT combination with radical esophagectomy were enrolled from three medical centers in China. The authors used propensity score matching (PSM, ration:1:1, caliper=0.01) and inverse probability processing weighting (IPTW) to balance the baseline characteristics and compare the outcomes. Conditional logistic regression and weighted logistic regression analysis were used to further evaluate whether additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy would increase the risk of postoperative AL.

RESULTS

A total of 331 patients getting partially advanced ESCC receiving nCT or nICT were enrolled from three medical centers in China. After PSM/IPTW, the baseline characteristics reached an equilibrium between the two groups. After matching, there were no significant difference in the AL incidence between the two groups ( P =0.68, after PSM; P =0.97 after IPTW), and the incidence of AL in the two groups was 15.85 versus 18.29%, and 14.79 versus 15.01%, respectively. After PSM/IPTW, both groups were similar in pleural effusion and pneumonia. After IPTW, the nICT group had a higher incidence of bleeding (3.36 vs. 0.30%, P =0.01), chylothorax (5.79 0.30%, P =0.001), and cardiac events (19.53 vs. 9.20%, P =0.04). recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (7.85 vs. 0.54%, P =0.003). After PSM, both groups were similar in palsy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (1.22 vs. 3.66%, P =0.31) and cardiac events (19.51 vs. 14.63%, P =0.41). Weighted logistic regression analysis showed that additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy was not responsible for AL (OR=0.56, 95% CI: [0.17, 1.71], after PSM; 0.74, 95% CI: [0.34,1.56], after IPTW). The nICT group had dramatically higher pCR in primary tumor than the nCT group ( P =0.003, PSM; P =0.005, IPTW), 9.76 versus 28.05% and 7.72 versus 21.17%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy could benefit pathological reactions without increasing the risk of AL and pulmonary complications. The authors require further randomized controlled research to validate whether additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy would make a difference in other complications, and determine whether pathologic benefits could translate into prognostic benefits, which would require longer follow-up.

Current neoadjuvant therapy for operable locally advanced esophageal cancer

Locally advanced esophageal cancer has a poor prognosis, while an increasing number of patients are diagnosed with that. Neoadjuvant therapy has become a hot topic in treating locally advanced esophageal cancer to improve its survival benefit. The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery has been confirmed by many studies, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are included in the guidelines. In recent years, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have emerged, and more studies are evaluating the efficacy of combining them with neoadjuvant therapy for operable esophageal cancer patients. Even though the preliminary data is disappointing, many trials are still under investigation without improving survival benefits. New indexes used as surrogate endpoints (e.g., major pathologic response and pathological complete response) are emerging to accelerate the development and approval of neoadjuvant drugs. This review summarized the research progress in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer and discussed which primary endpoint should be used in neoadjuvant therapy trials.

NK cells direct the perspective approaches to cancer immunotherapy

Natural killer (NK) cells are innate immune cells with cytotoxic potentials to kill cancerous cells in several mechanisms, which could be implied for cancer therapy. While potent, their antitumor activities specially for solid tumors impaired by inadequate tumor infiltration, suppressive tumor microenvironment, cancer-associated stroma cells, and tumor-supportive immune cells. Therefore, manipulating or reprogramming these barriers by prospective strategies might improve current immunotherapies in the clinic or introduce novel NK-based immunotherapies. NK-based immunotherapy could be developed in monotherapy or in combination with other therapeutic regimens such as oncolytic virus therapy and immune checkpoint blockade, as presented in this review.

The impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on perioperative outcomes and survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Objective

Immunotherapy for esophageal cancer is relatively novel but increasingly used. This study evaluated the early use of immunotherapy as an adjunct to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before esophagectomy for locally advanced disease.

Methods

Perioperative morbidity (composite of mortality, hospitalization ≥21 days, or readmission) and survival of patients with locally advanced (cT3N0M0, cT1-3N + M0) distal esophageal cancer in the National Cancer Database from 2013 to 2020 who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy alone followed by esophagectomy were evaluated using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional hazards methods, and propensity-matched analysis.

Results

Immunotherapy was used in 165 (1.6%) of 10,348 patients. Younger age (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.81; P < .001) predicted immunotherapy use, which slightly delayed time from diagnosis to surgery versus chemoradiation alone (immunotherapy 148 [interquartile range, 128-177] days vs chemoradiation 138 [interquartile range, 120-162] days, P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences between the immunotherapy and chemoradiation groups for the composite major morbidity index (14.5% [24/165] vs 15.6% [1584/10,183], P = .8). Immunotherapy was associated with a significant improvement in median overall survival (69.1 months vs 56.3 months, P = .005) and 3-year overall survival in univariate analysis (65.6% [95% confidence interval, 57.7-74.5] vs 55.0% [53.9-56.1], P = .005), and independently predicted improved survival in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.68 [95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.89], P = .006). Propensity-matched analysis also showed that immunotherapy use was not associated with increased surgical morbidity (P = .5) but was associated with improved survival (P = .047).

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy use before esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer did not lead to worse perioperative outcomes and shows promising results on midterm survival.

Radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical trials, efficacy and future directions

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a common malignancy worldwide and often diagnosed at advanced stages with poor prognosis. Combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy seems to be a promising approach for treating ESCC. This comprehensive review article summarizes the current state of combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in locally advanced/metastatic ESCC, delineates the clinical trials that merit attention, and outlines unresolved issues and future research directions in this field. The clinical trial findings suggest that radio-immunotherapy combination may improve tumor response and overall survival with manageable side effects, highlighting the importance of patient selection and the necessity for further research to optimize treatment strategies. Issues such as irradiation dosage, fractionation regimen, irradiation site and technique of radiotherapy, as well as the timing, sequence and duration of combination therapy will all affect treatment outcomes, justifying further in-depth investigation.

Evaluation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and traditional neoadjuvant therapy for resectable esophageal cancer: a systematic review and single-arm and network meta-analysis

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the role of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy with or without radiotherapy [NIC(R)T] compared to traditional neoadjuvant therapies, without immunotherapy [NC(R)T].

Summary background data

NCRT followed by surgical resection is recommended for patients with early-stage esophageal cancer. However, it is uncertain whether adding immunotherapy to preoperative neoadjuvant therapy would improve patient outcomes when radical surgery is performed following neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases, as well as international conference abstracts. Outcomes included R0, pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (mPR), overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates.

Results

We included data from 5,034 patients from 86 studies published between 2019 and 2022. We found no significant differences between NICRT and NCRT in pCR or mPR rates. Both were better than NICT, with NCT showing the lowest response rate. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has a significant advantage over traditional neoadjuvant therapy in terms of 1-year OS and DFS, with NICT having better outcomes than any of the other three treatments. There were no significant differences among the four neoadjuvant treatments in terms of R0 rates.

Conclusions

Among the four neoadjuvant treatment modalities, NICRT and NCRT had the highest pCR and mPR rates. There were no significant differences in the R0 rates among the four treatments. Adding immunotherapy to neoadjuvant therapy improved 1-year OS and DFS, with NICT having the highest rates compared to the other three modalities.

Systematic Review Registration

https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-12-0060/, identifier INPLASY2022120060.

Successful conversion surgery following chemotherapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor in an older adult patient with stage IVB esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case report

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy are common treatments for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with distant metastasis; however, the prognosis remains poor, and complete remission is difficult to achieve. Here, we report a case of an older adult patient with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgery following combined treatment of immunotherapy and chemotherapy and achieved pathological complete response.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 80-year-old woman presenting with difficulty swallowing was referred to our hospital. She was diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with distant metastasis of the lymph node at the dorsal side of the IVC and the left supraclavicular lymph node. She was treated with pembrolizumab, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil. After four pharmacotherapy courses, primary tumor and metastatic lymph node shrinkage was observed. The patient underwent thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy and regional lymph node dissection. The lymph node at the dorsal side of the IVC was not resected, and the left supraclavicular lymph node was removed. Histological examination revealed complete response with no residual tumor or lymph node metastasis. The patient had no recurrence 10 months postoperatively without adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion surgery following preoperative therapy, including immunotherapy, may be an effective treatment strategy for improving survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma even among older adult patients.

PES1 reduces CD8+ T cell infiltration and immunotherapy sensitivity via interrupting ILF3-IL15 complex in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has brought survival benefits to patients with specific cancer types, most of cancer patients remain refractory to the ICB therapy, which is largely attributed to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Thereby, it is urgent to profile key molecules and signal pathways responsible for modification of tumor microenvironment.

METHODS

Multiple databases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) were integratively analyzed to screen candidate genes responsible for infiltration of CD8⁺ T cells. Expression of pescadillo ribosomal biogenesis factor 1 (PES1) in clinical ESCC samples was examined by qRT-PCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry. The mechanisms of PES1 were investigated via RNA sequencing and mass spectrometry followed by immunoprecipitation and proximity ligation assay. The clinical and therapeutic significance of PES1 in ESCC was comprehensively investigated using ESCC cells and mouse model.

RESULTS

PES1 was significantly upregulated and correlated with poor prognosis in ESCC patients. PES1 knockdown decreased ESCC cell growth in vitro and in vivo and enhanced the efficacy of ICB therapy in mouse model, which was established through subcutaneous inoculation with ESCC cells. Analyses on RNA sequencing and mass spectrometry suggested that PES1 expression was negatively correlated with IL15 and ILF3 was one of the PES1-associated proteins. It has been known that ILF3 interacts with and stabilizes IL15 mRNA to increase IL15 protein level. Our data further indicated that PES1 interfered with the interaction between ILF3 and IL15 mRNA and impaired ILF3-mediated stabilization of IL15 mRNA, which eventually reduced the protein level of IL15. Interestingly, the inhibitory effect of ICB therapy boosted by PES1 knockdown dramatically antagonized by knockdown of IL15, which suppressed the tumor-infiltrated CD8⁺ T cells in ESCC. Finally, we confirmed the relationships among PES1, IL15, and CD8⁺ T cell infiltration in 10 locally advanced ESCC patients receiving ICB neoadjuvant therapy and demonstrated that ICB therapy would be more effective in those with low expression of PES1.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether, our findings herein provided novel insights on biological function and clinical significance of PES1 and suggested that high expression of PES1 could suppress ILF3-IL15 axis-mediated immunosurveillance and promote resistance to ICB through restraining tumor-infiltrated CD8⁺ T cells.

An Association Between Comorbidities and Postsurgical Complications in Adults Who Underwent Esophagectomy

Background Esophagectomy is the surgical excision of part or all of the esophagus and is associated with both common and serious complications. Various comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, smoking, and congestive heart failure (CHF), have been detected in individuals who have undergone esophagectomy. This study investigates the association of baseline characteristics and comorbidities with postoperative complications. Methods A retrospective cohort study based on data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was conducted, evaluating 2,544 patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2016 and December 2018. Data included baseline characteristics, established comorbidities, and postoperative complications within 30 days of the procedure. Risk-adjusted and unadjusted logistic regressions were used to assess the odds of postoperative complications against baseline characteristics. Results The majority of our population were white males (80.8% male; 78.2% white), with a mean age of 63.5 years. More than half of the patients were overweight or obese. A minority of our patients had a smoking history, weight loss, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or CHF. The most frequent postoperative complications were as follows: return to the operating room (15.7%), anastomotic leak (12.9%), pneumonia (12.7%), bleeding/transfusions (11.8%), readmissions (11.4%), and unplanned intubation (10.5%). Adjusted associations for odds of experiencing a postoperative complication were found to be statistically significant for age (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.03, and P < 0.001), operation time (OR 1.002, 95% CI 1.001-1.003, and P < 0.001), race (not white) (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.26-2.47, and P = 0.001), BMI (underweight) (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.36-3.50, and P = 0.001), smoking (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14-1.76, and P = 0.001), and chemotherapy and/or radiation (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, P = 0.038). Conclusions Our study found that age, operation time, nonwhite race, underweight BMI, and smoking were independently associated with an increased risk of developing a postoperative complication following esophagectomy. Additionally, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation are associated with a decreased risk. Understanding how baseline characteristics and comorbidities can affect rates of postoperative complications may help to adjust care for patients in both pre- and postoperative settings.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 antibody plus chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cancer

Objective

To compare effects and adverse events of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) antibody combined with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and CRT alone as the initial treatment in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed locally advanced ESCC patients who received Anti-PD-1+CRT as initial treatment at 3 institutions. Primary outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) including immune-related adverse events (irAEs).

Results

At data cutoff, 81 patients were included (30 Anti-PD-1+CRT, 51 CRT). Median follow-up was 31.4 months. Anti-PD-1+CRT resulted in significant improvements in PFS (median, 18.6 vs. 11.8 months, HR 0.48 [95% CI, 0.29-0.80], P = 0.008), and OS (median, 27.7 vs. 17.4 months, HR 0.37 [95% CI, 0.22-0.63], P = 0.002), compared with CRT in ESCC. The ORR and DCR of patients treated with Anti-PD-1+CRT were also significantly higher than those treated with CRT (80.0% vs. 56.9%, P = 0.034), (100% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.023), respectively. Anti-PD-1+CRT had better durable response compared with CRT, with DoR (median,17.3 vs. 11.1 months, P = 0.022). Treatment-related adverse event incidence was similar between the two groups (any Grade, 93.3% vs. 92.2%; ≥Grade 3, 50.0% vs. 33.3%).

Conclusion

Anti-PD-1 plus chemoradiotherapy demonstrated promising antitumor activity and was well tolerated in locally advanced ESCC.

Surgical Approach to Esophagectomy Post CheckMate 577

Following the results of the CheckMate 577 trial, the Food and Drug Administration approved adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer without a pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy. This innovation in systemic therapy has rekindled the debate around the clinical value of an extended lymphadenectomy at the time of esophagectomy. In this article, we provide a review of the oncologic principles and potential risks and benefits of extended lymphadenectomy at the time of esophagectomy with acknowledgments to current and forthcoming innovations in thoracic surgery.

Presurgical radiation and chemotherapy in preparation for thoracic tumor resection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article aims at describing the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy as well the novel immunotherapy and targeted therapy in thoracic oncology with focus on anesthetic considerations of such treatments for the surgical patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, immune check point inhibitors have changed the landscape of thoracic oncology treatment. In this review, we summarize the key studies that have been fundamental in this change.

SUMMARY

Rather than a comprehensive review, the purpose of this work is to provide the reader with an overview of the most common neoadjuvant regimens used in current practice, with the corresponding most prevalent adverse effects as it pertains for patients with esophageal and lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma and mediastinal tumors. Considerations relevant to the anesthesiologist, including specific toxicities related to each treatment type, and the impact of each treatment type on perioperative outcomes and complications will be discussed.

Minimally invasive versus open McKeown esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to compare short and mid-term outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients undergoing open or minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIE) after neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced ESCC underwent open or minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy after neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy were retrospectively included from June 2019 to June 2021. The baseline characteristics, pathological data, short-and mid-term outcomes were collected and compared based on the surgical approach.

Results

A total of 35 patients were included in the study. An open procedure was performed for 13 patients (37.1%), and 22 (62.9%) patients underwent MIE after neoadjuvant therapy. Compared with open group, MIE group had shorter operative times (350.8± 117.8 vs. 277.9 ± 30.2 min, P = 0.009). The total number of resected lymph nodes was not significantly different, but more left recurrent laryngeal lymph nodes were harvested from the Open group (2.6 ± 3.2 vs. 0.9 ± 1.7, P = 0.047). The median follow-up time was 1.42 years (range, 0.35-2.59 years) from the first day of treatment. Three patients (8.6%) died during follow-up, one in the open surgery group and two in the MIE group. There were six (17.1%) patients developed recurrence, three in each group. The 2-year cumulative survival rates were 92.3 ± 7.4% and 89.5 ± 7.1% for the open and MIE groups, respectively. Overall survival was not different between the two surgical approaches.

Conclusions

MIE might be safe and feasible for patients with locally advanced ESCC undergoing neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy.

Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy versus routine neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy (nICT) or chemoradiotherapy (nICRT) in locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) is currently an area of active ongoing research. Therefore, we carried out a comprehensive meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of the new strategy with routine neoadjuvant strategy, which included neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

Patients and methods

MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase (via OVID), ISI Web of Science database and Cochrane Library were included. And, all of them were searched for eligible studies between January, 2000 and February, 2023. The pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) were primary outcome of our study. The second outcome of interest was R0 resection rate. Odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% CI were used as the effect indicators comparing the safety and efficiency of the neoadjuvant immunotherapy with the routine neoadjuvant therapy. Fixed-effect model (Inverse Variance) or random-effect model (Mantel-Haenszel method) was performed depending on the statistically heterogeneity.

Results

There were eight trials with 652 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The estimated pCR rate was higher in the neoadjuvant immunotherapy group (OR =1.86; 95% CI, 1.25-2.75; I² = 32.8%, P=0.166). The different results were found in the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) subgroups, the estimated OR was 2.35 (95%CI, 1.00-2.72; I² = 30.9%, P=0.215) in the EAC subgroup, and 2.35 (95% CI, 1.20-4.54; I² = 45.3%, P=0.161) in the ESCC subgroup, respectively. The neoadjuvant immunotherapy also showed the advantage in the MPR rates (OR =2.66; 95% CI, 1.69-4.19; I² = 24.3%, P=0.252). There was no obvious difference between the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and routine neoadjuvant therapy with respect to surgical resection rate, R0 resection rate, surgical delay rate; while more treatment-related adverse events were observed for the neoadjuvant immunotherapy for pneumonitis/pneumonia (OR=3.46, 95% CI, 1.31-9.16; I² = 67.3%, P=0.005) and thyroid dysfunction (OR=4.69, 95% CI, 1.53-14.36; I² = 56.5%, P=0.032).

Conclusion

The pooled correlations indicated that the neoadjuvant immunotherapy (both nICT and nICRT) could significantly increase the rates of pCR and MPR, compared with routine neoadjuvant therapy (both nCT and nCRT) in the treatment of locally advanced EC. The neoadjuvant immunotherapy and routine neoadjuvant therapy were with acceptable toxicity. However, randomized studies with larger groups of patients need to performed to confirm these results.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020155802.

Safety and short-term outcomes of gastrectomy after preoperative chemotherapy plus immunotherapy versus preoperative chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The safety and short-term outcomes of gastrectomy after preoperative chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (PCIT) versus preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remain unclear. This study was conducted to compare the safety and short-term efficacy of PCIT with those of PCT in patients with AGC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with AGC who received PCIT or PCT at Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute Gastrointestinal Cancer Center I between January 2019 and June 2021. The clinical characteristics were recorded, and short-term oncological outcomes were compared. Independent t tests, Mann‒Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and Fisher's exact tests were used to calculate differences. The correlation analyses were performed using Pearson correlation. All p values were two-sided, and a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All the above statistical analyses were conducted by the SPSS version 24.0 software package (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

A total of 162 AGC patients were included in this study, including 25 patients who received PCIT and 137 patients who received PCT. There were no significant differences in preoperative treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) between the PCIT group and the PCT group (p = 0.088). Compared with the PCT group, the PCIT group had comparable postoperative functional recovery, with no significant differences in terms of time to first aerofluxus (p = 0.349), time to first defecation (p = 0.800), time to liquid diet (p = 0.233), or length of stay (p = 0.278). No significant differences were observed in terms of postoperative complications (p = 0.952), postoperative pain intensity at 24, 48, or 72 h (p = 0.375, p = 0.601, and p = 0.821, respectively), or postoperative supplementary analgesic use between the two groups (p = 0.881). In addition, the postoperative complication rate was 33.3% following laparoscopic approaches and 31.2% following open approaches in the PCIT group, with no significant difference (p = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

In patients with AGC, gastrectomy with D2 or D2 + lymphadenectomy after PCIT had comparable short-term oncological outcomes to PCT.

Pathologic responses and surgical outcomes after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Currently, the role of immunotherapy in neoadjuvant setting for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is gradually attracting attention. Few studies compared the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). Our study aimed to compare treatment response and postoperative complications after NICT followed by surgery with that after conventional NCRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC.

METHODS

Of 468 patients with locally advanced ESCC, 154 received conventional NCRT, whereas 314 received NICT. Treatment response, postoperative complications and mortality between two groups were compared. Pathological response of primary tumor was evaluated using the Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) scoring system. Pathological complete response (pCR) of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) was defined as no viable tumor cell within all resected metastatic LNs. According to regression directionality, tumor regression pattern was summarized into four categories: type I, regression toward the lumen; type II, regression toward the invasive front; type III, concentric regression; and type IV, scattered regression. Inverse probability propensity score weighting was performed to minimize the influence of confounding factors.

RESULTS

After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the R0 resection rates (90.9% vs. 89.0%, P=0.302) and pCR (ypT0N0) rates (29.8% vs. 34.0%, P=0.167) were comparable between two groups. Patients receiving NCRT showed lower TRG score (P<0.001) and higher major pathological response (MPR) rate (64.7% vs. 53.6%, P=0.001) compared to those receiving NICT. However, NICT brought a higher pCR rate of metastatic LNs than conventional NCRT (53.9% vs. 37.1%, P<0.001). The rates of type I/II/III/IV regression patterns were 44.6%, 6.8%, 11.4% and 37.1% in the NICT group, 16.9%, 8.2%, 18.3% and 56.6% in the NCRT group, indicating a significant difference (P<0.001). Moreover, there were no significant differences in the incidence of total postoperative complications (35.8% vs. 39.9%, P=0.189) and 30-d mortality (0.0% vs. 1.1%, P=0.062).

CONCLUSION

For patients with locally advanced ESCC, NICT showed a R0 resection rate and pCR (ypT0N0) rate comparable to conventional NCRT, without increased incidence of postoperative complications and mortality. Notablely, NICT followed by surgery might bring a promising treatment response of metastatic LNs.

Research trends on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for esophageal cancer: A bibliometric analysis

Objectives

The study aims to summarize publication characteristics of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy for esophageal cancer and create scientific maps to explore hotspots and emerging trends with bibliometric methods.

Methods

The publications between 2012 and 2021 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) on June 20, 2022. Bibliometric tools including HistCite, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace were used for statistical analysis. Data on the trend of the annual output, countries/regions, institutions, journals, authors, subject categories, keywords, and co-cited references were presented in this study.

Results

A total of 552 publications written by 3,623 authors of 872 institutions, 44 countries/regions in 250 journals were included in the bibliometric study. China, USA and Japan were the key countries in this field. Kato Ken, Bang Yung-Jue, Frontiers in Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Natl Canc Ctr were the top 1 productive author, co-cited author, productive journal, co-cited journal and prolific institution, respectively. The top 4 most present keywords were esophageal cancer, immunotherapy, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, response, PD-1 blockade and CD8+ T cell were four latest research frontiers. The keywords reflected the progress from PD-1/PD-L1 expression to the clinical application of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The current researches mainly focus on neoadjuvant immunotherapy for esophageal cancer and development of biomarkers. Further research is warranted to determine effective predictive biomarkers or models, illustrate the molecular mechanism of combined treatment, and construct the optimal therapeutic strategy.

Conclusions

This study visually analyzed the global trend and hotspots of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for esophageal cancer over the past decade. The results could guide scientists to comprehensively understand the global frontiers and determine future directions.

Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in esophageal cancer: real-world multicenter retrospective study in China

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown a powerful benefit in the neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer, but evidence for its safety and efficacy is limited and may not reflect real-world practice. We retrospectively reviewed the database of treatment-naive patients from 15 esophageal cancer centers in China who received ICIs as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer from May 2019 to December 2020. The primary endpoints were rate and severity of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Secondary endpoints included pathologically complete response (pCR) rate, R0 resection rate, mortality and morbidity. Among the 370 patients, 311 (84.1%) were male with a median age of 63 (range: 30-81) years and stage III or IVa disease accounted for 84.1% of these patients. A total of 299 (80.8%) patients were treated with ICIs and chemotherapy. TRAEs were observed in 199 (53.8%) patients with low severity (grade 1-2, 39.2%; grade 3-4, 13.2%; grade 5, 1.4%), and irAEs occurred in 24.3% of patients and were mostly of grade 1-2 severity (21.1%). A total of 341 (92.2%) patients had received surgery and R0 resection was achieved in 333 (97.7%) patients. The local pCR rate in primary tumor was 34.6%, including 25.8% of ypT0N0 and 8.8% of ypT0N+. The rate of postoperative complications was 41.4% and grade 3 or higher complications occurred in 35 (10.3%) patients. No death was observed within 30 days after surgery, and three patients (0.9%) died within 90 days postoperatively. This study shows acceptable toxicity of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer in real-world data. Long-term survival results are pending for further investigations.

Association of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab for Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Adverse Events After Surgery in Treatment-Naive Patients

Importance

Pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death 1, is currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The potential neoadjuvant role of programmed cell death 1 inhibitors in primary surgical management of HNSCC and effects on surgical outcomes are poorly understood.

Objective

To evaluate the incidence of postoperative adverse events in treatment-naive patients with advanced oral cavity cancer receiving neoadjuvant pembrolizumab when compared with matched controls, as part of a window-of-opportunity multi-institutional clinical trial assessing neoadjuvant pembrolizumab for locally advanced HNSCC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary academic institution included treatment-naive patients with local regionally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) who were undergoing surgical resection.

Exposures

Patients with local regionally advanced resectable OCSCC who received neoadjuvant pembrolizumab were retrospectively reviewed for postoperative adverse events. Controls were matched by age, race, smoking status, and overall cancer stage based on historical data at the same institution. Matched-cohort analysis was performed using a McNemar test to assess differences between the groups.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Incidence of adverse events following surgical resection of advanced OCSCC within 30 days of surgery and on continued follow-up.

Results

A total of 64 patients (32 as part of the prospective clinical trial and 32 as controls; mean [SD] age, 59.6 [10.3] years; 28 [44%] women) were included in the analysis. Postoperative adverse events in the 32 patients receiving pembrolizumab included lymphedema (n = 20 [63%]), trismus (n = 7 [22%]), return to operating room (n = 7 [22%]), wound infection (n = 7 [22%]), fistula (n = 6 [19%]), wound dehiscence (n = 4 [13%]), flap failure (n = 3 [9%]), and hematoma (n = 2 [6%]). The matched control group demonstrated similar complication rates without considerable differences, except for trismus (n = 16 [50%]), which was greater by a difference of 28.1% (95% CI, 5.6%-50.6%) in the control group.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study examined surgical complications among patients with local regionally advanced OCSCC treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and found that serious adverse events were similar to those in patients who underwent standard-of-care treatment. This suggests that there is no increased perioperative morbidity in the use of preoperative treatment with immunotherapy. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings for oral cavity cancer and other subsites of the head and neck.

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Sintilimab-Based Regimens against Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study

This study is aimed at assessing the sintilimab-based regimens' safety and efficacy for advanced esophageal cancer (EC) treatment in the real world. Cases of advanced EC treated with sintilimab-based regimens in the Anyang Tumor Hospital between 1 January 2020 and 1 August 2021 were retrospectively examined. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. Among the 50 included patients, the median PFS was 11.3 months (95% CI: 5.0-17.6 months), and the 1-year PFS rate was 49.2%. The median OS was not reached, and the 1-year OS rate was 67.1%. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) were seen in 14% (n = 7), 46% (n = 23), 32% (n = 16), and 8% (n = 4) of the 50 patients, respectively. Therefore, the ORR and DCR were 60% (30/50) and 92% (46/50), respectively. The CR rate of patients with radiotherapy was higher than that without radiotherapy (25% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.031). The 1-year OS rate was higher in patients with radiotherapy than in patients without radiotherapy (85.9% vs. 53.2%, P = 0.020). The most observed AEs included anemia, decrease in white blood cell count, nausea/vomiting, and hypoproteinemia. Sintilimab-based regimens achieved good disease control and tolerance for treating advanced EC in the real world. Combined radiotherapy can improve the efficacy and deserves further study.

Efficacy and safety of radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for locally advanced stages of esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Radiotherapy (RT)/Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are important treatments for all stages of esophageal cancer (EC). The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with RT/CRT seems to be promising avenue for the treatment of EC. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in order to assess the safety and efficacy of RT/CRT and ICI combination therapy for EC patients.

Methods

PubMed and several other databases were searched (according to specific criteria) to find relevant studies published prior to the 31st of December 2021.

Results

1962 articles were identified for screening, and six trials containing 668 patients were identified and pooled to determine the one- and two-year overall survival (OS), which were 84.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 69.9%-100%) and 68.3% (95% CI: 49.0%-95.1%), respectively. Additionally, the rate of pooled grade 3-5 adverse reactions was 41.0% (95% CI: 31.2%-51.2%). The rate of specific grade 3-5 adverse reactions are as follows: lymphopenia (36.8%-60%), esophagitis (20%), anastomotic leakage (18%), esophageal fistula (10%), pain (10%), leukopenia (5.3%-10%), esophageal hemorrhage (2.5%-5%), chyle leakage (3%), fatigue (5%), cough (2.7%-5%), diarrhea (2.7%), pulmonary embolism (2.5%) and allergic reaction (2.5%). The pooled rate of pneumonitis of grade 3-5 and grade 1-5 was 0.8% (95% CI: 0.1%-0.16%, I2: 0%) and 5.4% (95% CI: 2.0%-14.2%, I2: 82%). For thoracic complication, esophagitis was 63.6% (95% CI: 42.4%-80.6%), which appeared to be more frequent with the combination of ICIs to RT/CRT (12%-37.7%). Other thoracic complications include esophageal hemorrhage (2.5%-10%), esophageal fistula (6%-10%) and anastomotic leakage (6%-21%). Additionally, some of the trials did not report cardiac related adverse reactions. The subgroup analyses also revealed that the pooled rate patients with grade 3-5 pneumonitis was higher for CRT/RT with concurrent and sequential ICI treatment (1.9%) than other groups (0.8%).

Conclusion

This study suggests that the addition of ICIs to RT/CRT for EC patients may be both safe and feasible. However, larger randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ESCC and its impact on esophagectomy

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the most common type of esophageal cancer in China. The use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of ESCC is gradually increasing. Camrelizumab is one such immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) used for treatment. In this retrospective study, we explored the efficacy, safety, and short-term perioperative prognosis of camrelizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ESCC.

Materials and Methods

A total of 254 Chinese patients with ESCC were enrolled in the study; 48 received camrelizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (C-NC group), and 206 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC group). All patients underwent surgery after the completion of 2 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy.

Results

Twenty patients (20/48, 41.7%) in the C-NC group and 22 patients (22/206, 10.7%) in the NC group achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) (p<0.001). Twenty-nine patients (29/48, 60.4%) in the C-NC group and 56 patients (56/206, 27.2%) in the NC group achieved major pathologic remission (MPR) (p<0.001). There was a lower incidence of myelosuppression during neoadjuvant therapy in patients in the C-NC group (33/48, 68.8%) than in the NC group (174/206, 84.5%, p=0.012). The total incidence of adverse reactions during neoadjuvant therapy was also lower in the C-NC group (37/48, 77.1%) than in the NC group (189/206, 91.7%, p=0.003). Patients in the C-NC group had more lymph nodes cleared during surgery than those in the NC group (34 vs.30, p<0.001). The logistic model showed that the treatment regimen, age, and presence of lymph node metastasis were influential factors for achieving a pCR in these patients (p<0.001). Regarding other adverse events and surgery-related data, there were no significant differences observed between the two groups.

Conclusion

Camrelizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an efficacious neoadjuvant regimen with an acceptable safety profile and does not increase the difficulty of surgery or the incidence of complications. A pCR is more likely to be achieved in patients treated with camrelizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in younger patients, or in those without lymph node metastases.

The Key Clinical Questions of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer—A Review

Over 50% of individuals with esophageal cancer (EC) present with advanced stages of the disease; therefore, their outcome following surgery alone is poor, with only 25%–36% being alive 5 years post-surgery. Based on the evidence that the CROSS and NEOCRTEC5010 trials provided, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is now the standard therapy for patients with locally advanced EC. However, there are still many concerning clinical questions that remain controversial such as radiation dose, appropriate patient selection, the design of the radiation field, the time interval between chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery, and esophageal retention. With immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) rapidly becoming a mainstay of cancer therapy, along with radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, the combination mode of immunotherapy is also becoming a hot topic of discussion. Here, we try to provide constructive suggestions to answer the perplexing problems and clinical concerns for the progress of nCRT for EC in the future.

The comparisons of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the short-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by oesophagectomy for locally advanced oesophageal squamous carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy or chemoradiotherapy between September 2019 and September 2021 were identified. The primary outcomes were tumour response and survival. Secondary outcomes were toxic effects and postoperative complications. The propensity score matching for enrolled patients was performed.

RESULTS

Data of 149 patients with clinical stage II-IV oesophageal squamous cancer, including 55 receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and 94 receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, were analyzed after propensity score matching. With regard to tumour response score, 24 (43.6%) and 59 (62.8%) patients were scored 0/1 in the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy groups, respectively (p = 0.023). Of note, 17 (30.9%) patients in the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group achieved pathological complete response (ypT0N0), while 48 (51.1%) patients in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group achieved pathological complete response (P = 0.026). Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with higher risk of postoperative pneumonia (p = 0.034) and less lymph nodes and stations dissected (p ≤ 0.001). The 1-year cumulative overall survival rate was 94.5% and 86.2% in the NACI and NACR groups, respectively (p = 0.170).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with lower pneumonia rate and was safe and feasible for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cancer. However, the tumour regression score and the pathological complete response rate of patients treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy was lower than those of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The short-term follow-up results were comparable between two treatment modalities.

Safety and Feasibility of Esophagectomy Following Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background

This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of esophagectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

We retrospectively identified patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (n = 38) in our center between 2020 and 2021. The primary end point was the risk of major complications (grade ≥3) according to the Clavien–Dindo classification. Secondary end points were surgical details, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readministration.

Results

The most commonly used regimens of immunotherapy were camrelizumab (36.8%), pembrolizumab (31.5%), tislelizumab (15.8%), sintilimab (13.2%), and toripalimab (2.6%). The median interval to surgery was 63 days (range, 40–147). Esophagectomy was performed in 37 of 38 patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. All procedures were performed minimally invasively, except for 1 patient who was converted to thoracotomy. Of 37 surgical patients, R0 resection was achieved in 36 patients (97.3%). Pathologic complete response was observed in 9 patients (24.3%). Tumor regression grade I was identified in 17 patients (45.9%). Morbidity occurred in 12 of 37 patients (32.4%). The most common complication was pneumonia (16.2%). There were no deaths or readministration within 30 days.

Conclusions

Esophagectomy following neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma appears to be safe and feasible, with acceptable complication rates.

Safety and Feasibility of Esophagectomy Following Combined Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Objectives

The combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy (nICT) is a novel treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer. There is concern that nICT may increase operation difficulty, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. This study aimed to compare short-term outcomes among esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and nICT and for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients (from January 2017 through July 2021) who underwent surgery for ESCC following neoadjuvant therapy. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper 0.05 was conducted to balance potential bias.

Results

A 1:1 PSM was conducted based on clinical stage, age, body mass index (BMI), and tumor location, and then 32 comparable pairs were matched. After PSM, age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, smoking history, clinical stage, tumor location, lymphadenectomy field, pathological stage, anastomotic position, route of gastric conduit, procedure type, and operative approach were comparable between groups. Compared with the nICT group (median, 300 min), the operation time was significantly longer in the nCRT group (median, 376 min). However, both groups were comparable in intraoperative blood loss, thoracic drainage volume, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative hospital stays, and hospital cost. Further, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, ICU readmission, and major complications were similar in both groups. The nCRT group had an advantage in pathological response. The pathological complete response (pCR) was 18.8% (6/32) in the nICT group and 43.8% (14/32) in the nCRT group (p = 0.03). The major pathological response (MPR) was 71.9% (23/32) in the nCRT group and 34.4% (11/32) in the nICT group (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Based on our preliminary experience, esophagectomy appears to be safe and feasible following combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Safety and feasibility of esophagectomy following combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a propensity score matching

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of esophagectomy following combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients who were treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy (NICT, n = 27) or chemotherapy alone (NCT, n = 95) at our institution between January, 2017 and April, 2021. The primary end point was 30-day complications. Major complications were defined as Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ 3. Secondary end points were interval to surgery, operation time, postoperative thoracic drainage, thoracic drainage tube stay, 30-day readmission rate, and 30-day mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias caused by potential confounding.

RESULTS

All patients included successfully completed neoadjuvant therapy and underwent McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy negative margins. Out of 122 eligible patients, 26 patients in NICT group and 52 patients in NCT group were identified by 1:2 PSM. After PSM, the clinical stage was matched and demographic characteristics of the two groups were well balanced, including age, gender, BMI, ASA status, age-adjusted Charlson index, smoking, drinking, chemotherapy regimens, neoadjuvant cycle, tumor location, lymphadenectomy, pathological stage, histologic sub-type, anastomotic position, route of gastric conduit, procedure type, and operative approach were comparable between groups after PSM. Although NICT group had a higher incidence of pneumonia and pleural effusion, however, the CCI index, other complication and major complications were comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, thoracic drainage tube stays, thoracic drainage volume, ICU stay, postoperative hospital stay and hospital cost. Furthermore, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, ICU readmission were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our preliminary experience, esophagectomy is safe and feasible following combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.