The impact of pulmonary artery catheter use in cardiac surgery

The Use of Pulmonary Artery Catheters and Echocardiography in the Cardiac Surgery Setting: A Nationwide Italian Survey

OBJECTIVE

Wide variations exist in the use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) and echocardiography in the field of cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A national survey promoted by the Italian Association of Cardio-Thoracic Anesthesiologists and Intensive Care was conducted.

SETTING

The study occurred in Italian cardiac surgery centers (n = 71).

PARTICIPANTS

Anesthesiologists-intensivists were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

Anonymous questionnaires were used to investigate the use of PACs and echocardiography in the operating room (OR) and intensive care unit (ICU).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 257 respondents (32.2% response rate) from 59 centers (83.1% response rate) participated. Use of PACs seems less common in ORs (median insertion in 20% [5-70] of patients), with slightly higher use in ICUs; in about half of cases, it was the continuous cardiac output monitoring system of choice. Almost two-thirds of respondents recently inserted at least one PAC within a few hours of ICU admission, despite its need being largely preoperatively predictable. Protocols regulating PAC insertion were reported by 25.3% and 28% of respondents (OR and ICU, respectively). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed intraoperatively in >75% of patients by 86.4% of respondents; only 23.7% stated that intraoperative TEE relied on anesthesiologists. Tissue Doppler and/or 3D imaging were widely available (87.4% and 82%, respectively), but only 37.8% and 24.3% of respondents self-declared skills in these modalities, respectively; 77.1% of respondents had no echocardiography certification, nor were pursuing certification (various reasons); 40.9% had not attended recent echocardiography courses. Lower PAC use was associated with university hospitals (OR: p = 0.014, ICU: p = 0.032) and with lower interventions/year (OR: p = 0.023). Higher independence in performing TEE was reported in university hospitals (OR: p < 0.001; ICU: p = 0.006), centers with higher interventions/year (OR: p = 0.019), and by respondents with less experience in cardiology (ICU: p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

Variability in the use of PACs and echocardiography was found. Protocols regulating the use of PACs seem infrequent. University centers use PACs less and have greater skills in TEE. Training and certifications in echocardiography should be encouraged.

EFFECT OF PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETERIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH NONISCHEMIC CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: A NATIONWIDE ANALYSIS

ABSTRACT

Background: Pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) has been widely used in critically ill patients, yielding mixed results. Prior studies on cardiogenic shock (CS) predominantly included patients with acute myocardial infarction. This study aims to examine the effect of PAC use in patients with nonischemic CS. Methods: This retrospective cohort study employed data from the National Inpatient Sample database, including weighted hospitalizations of adult patients with nonischemic CS during 2017 to 2019. In-hospital outcomes were compared between groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: A total of 303,970 patients with nonischemic CS were included, of whom 17.5% received a PAC during their hospitalization. The median age was 67 years (interquartile range: 57-77) and 61% were male. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, patients in the PAC group had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (24.8% vs. 35.3%, P < 0.001), renal replacement therapy (10.7% vs. 12.4%, P = 0.002), in-hospital cardiac arrest (7.1% vs. 9.6%, P < 0.001), and mechanical ventilation (44.6% vs. 50.4%, P < 0.001) compared to non-PAC group. In contrast, the PAC group had higher use of intra-aortic balloon pump (15.4% vs. 3.4%, P < 0.001), percutaneous ventricular assist devices (12.6% vs. 2.6%, P < 0.001), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (3.9% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.001), and heart transplantation (2.1% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: In the real-world setting, invasive hemodynamic monitoring with PAC in patients with nonischemic CS is associated with survival benefits and a reduction in adverse events, including reduced need for renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation and risk of in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Pulmonary artery catheter use and in-hospital outcomes in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association of intraoperative pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use with in-hospital outcomes in cardiac surgical patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library (Wiley) databases were screened for studies that compared cardiac surgical patients receiving intraoperative PAC with controls and reporting in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit length of stay, cost of hospitalization, fluid volume administered, intubation time, inotropes use, acute kidney injury (AKI), stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and infections.

RESULTS

Seven studies (25 853 patients, 88.6% undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery) were included. In-hospital mortality was significantly increased with PAC use [odds ratio (OR) 1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-2.20, P = 0.04]; PAC use was also associated with greater intraoperative inotrope use (OR 2.61; 95% CI 1.54-4.41) and costs [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.20; 95% CI 0.16-0.23], longer intensive care unit stay (SMD = 0.29; 95% CI 0.25-0.33), and longer intubation time (SMD = 0.44; 95% CI 0.12-0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

PAC use is associated with significantly increased odds of in-hospital mortality, but the amount and quality of the available evidence is limited. Prospective randomized trials testing the effect of PAC on the outcomes of cardiac surgical patients are urgently needed.

Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: A Joint Consensus Statement by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Cardiac Society, ERAS International Society, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown to lessen surgical insult, promote recovery, and improve postoperative clinical outcomes across a number of specialty operations. A core tenet of ERAS involves the provision of protocolized evidence-based perioperative interventions. Given both the growing enthusiasm for applying ERAS principles to cardiac surgery and the broad scope of relevant interventions, an international, multidisciplinary expert panel was assembled to derive a list of potential program elements, review the literature, and provide a statement regarding clinical practice for each topic area. This article summarizes those consensus statements and their accompanying evidence. These results provide the foundation for best practice for the management of the adult patient undergoing cardiac surgery.

Pulmonary artery catheter receipt among cardiac surgery patients from the national inpatient sample (1999-2019): Prevalence, predictors and hospitalization charges

Despite limited evidence to support its efficacy, use of pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), a relatively expensive medical device, for monitoring clinical status and guiding therapeutic interventions, has become standard of care in many settings, and especially during and after cardiac surgery. We examined the prevalence and predictors of PAC use and its association with hospitalization charges among cardiac surgery patients generally and for each selected subgroup of high-risk or complex surgical procedures. We conducted an analysis on 1,442,528 records from the National Inpatient Sample (1999-2019) that included cardiac surgery patients ≥18 years of age. Subgroups were categorized based on the presence of specific disorders like tricuspid or mitral valve disease, pulmonary hypertension, heart failure, or cardiac surgery combinations. Multivariable regression models were constructed to assess predictors of PAC use as well as PAC use as a predictor of loge hospitalization charges controlling for patient and hospital characteristics. Based on International Classification of Diseases procedure codes, PAC use was prevalent among 7.15 % of cardiac surgery hospitalizations, and hospitalization charges were estimated at $191,345, with no differences according to PAC use. Overall, being female, having Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) > 0, and non-payer (versus Medicare) status were independently associated with PAC use. Among the subgroup with the selected conditions, being female, having CCI>0, and being a Medicaid (versus Medicare) recipient were independently associated with PAC use, whereas elective admission was inversely related to PAC use. Among the subgroup without the selected conditions, having a CCI >0, elective admission, and non-payer (vs. Medicare) status were independently associated with PAC use. PAC use was not independently related to hospitalization charges overall or among subgroups. In conclusion, approximately 7 % of cardiac surgery hospitalizations received a PAC, with no differences in charges according to PAC use and disparities in PAC use driven by sex, elective admission, CCI and health insurance status. Large randomized trials are required to characterize the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of PAC use among distinct groups of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring in cardiac surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiac surgery has traditionally relied upon invasive hemodynamic monitoring, including regular use of pulmonary artery catheters. More recently, there has been advancement in our understanding as well as broader adoption of less invasive alternatives. This review serves as an outline of the key perioperative hemodynamic monitoring options for cardiac surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent study has revealed that the use of invasive monitoring such as pulmonary artery catheters or transesophageal echocardiography in low-risk patients undergoing low-risk cardiac surgery is of questionable benefit. Lesser invasive approaches such a pulse contour analysis or ultrasound may provide a useful alternative to assess patient hemodynamics and guide resuscitation therapy. A number of recent studies have been published to support broader indication for these evolving technologies.

SUMMARY

More selective use of indwelling catheters for cardiac surgery has coincided with greater application of less invasive alternatives. Understanding the advantages and limitations of each tool allows the bedside clinician to identify which hemodynamic monitoring modality is most suitable for which patient.

Comparison of invasive and non-invasive measurements of cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance in living-donor liver transplantation: a prospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

Based on the controversy surrounding pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) in surgical patients, we investigated the interchangeability of cardiac index (CI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) measurements between ClearSight™ and PAC during living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

This prospective study included consecutively selected LDLT patients. ClearSight™-based CI and SVR measurements were compared with those from PAC at seven LDLT-stage time points. ClearSight™-based systolic (SAP), mean (MAP), and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressures were also compared with those from femoral arterial catheterization (FAC). For the comparison and analysis of ClearSight™ and the reference method, Bland-Altman analysis was used to analyze accuracy while polar and four-quadrant plots were used to analyze the trending ability.

RESULTS

From 27 patients, 189 pairs of ClearSight™ and reference values were analyzed. The CI and SVR performance errors (PEs) exhibited poor accuracy between the two methods (51.52 and 51.73%, respectively) in the Bland-Altman analysis. CI and SVR also exhibited unacceptable trending abilities in both the polar and four-quadrant plot analyses. SAP, MAP, and DAP PEs between the two methods displayed favorable accuracy (24.28, 21.18, and 26.26%, respectively). SAP and MAP exhibited acceptable trending ability in the four-quadrant plot between the two methods, but not in the polar plot analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

During LDLT, CI and SVR demonstrated poor interchangeability, while SAP and MAP exhibited acceptable interchangeability between ClearSight™ and FAC.

Characteristics of pulmonary artery catheter use in multicenter ICUs in Japan and the association with mortality: a multicenter cohort study using the Japanese Intensive care PAtient Database

BACKGROUND

It has been 50 years since the pulmonary artery catheter was introduced, but the actual use of pulmonary artery catheters in recent years is unknown. Some randomized controlled trials have reported no causality with mortality, but some observational studies have been published showing an association with mortality for patients with cardiogenic shock, and the association with a pulmonary artery catheter and mortality is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the utilization of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and to examine their association with mortality, taking into account differences between hospitals.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis using the Japanese Intensive care PAtient Database, a multicenter, prospective, observational registry in Japanese ICUs. We included patients aged 16 years or older who were admitted to the ICU for reasons other than procedures. We excluded patients who were discharged within 24 h or had missing values. We compared the prognosis of patients with and without PAC. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. We performed propensity score analysis to adjust for baseline characteristics and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 184,705 patients in this registry from April 2015 to December 2020, 59,922 patients were included in the analysis. Most patients (94.0%) with a PAC in place had cardiovascular disease. There was a wide variation in the frequency of PAC use between hospitals, from 0 to 60.3% (median 14.4%, interquartile range 2.2-28.6%). Hospital mortality was not significantly different between the PAC use group and the non-PAC use group in patients after adjustment for propensity score analysis (3.9% vs 4.3%; difference, - 0.4%; 95% CI - 1.1 to 0.3; p = 0.32). Among patients with cardiac disease, those with post-open-heart surgery and those in shock, hospital mortality was also not significantly different between the two groups (3.4% vs 3.7%, p = 0.45, 1.7% vs 1.7%, p = 0.93, 4.8% vs 4.9%, p = 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of PAC use varied among hospitals. PAC use for ICU patients was not associated with lower hospital mortality after adjusting for differences between hospitals.

No association between pulmonary artery catheter use and postoperative complications in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a single-center pilot study

BACKGROUND

A pulmonary artery catheter is often used in cardiac surgery despite its uncertain effectiveness. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the associations between the use of a pulmonary artery catheter and clinical outcomes in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Patients over 20 years of age who had undergone off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting between December 2018 and November 2021 were enrolled in this single-center retrospective pilot study. The propensity score of pulmonary artery catheterization was calculated. Multivariate analysis including the propensity score as a covariate was performed to assess clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the composite outcome of in-hospital death, unplanned intraoperative conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass, resuscitated cardiac arrest, mechanical circulatory support, myocardial infarction, stroke, new initiation of renal replacement therapy, inhaled nitric oxide, re-intubation and tracheostomy.

RESULTS

Among the 315 patients who were enrolled, 298 were included in the final analysis. A pulmonary artery catheter was inserted in 131 patients. There were 50 patients with the composite outcome including two in-hospital deaths. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that pulmonary artery catheterization was not significantly related to the composite outcome. Clinical outcomes worsened significantly as the number of anastomoses increased (odds ratio: 1.450, 95% confidence interval: 1.040-2.040, P=0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary artery catheterization did not improve the clinical outcomes in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in this pilot study.

Association of pulmonary artery catheter with in-hospital outcomes after cardiac surgery in the United States: National Inpatient Sample 1999-2019

To examine associations of pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use with in-hospital death and hospital length of stay (days) overall and within subgroups of hospitalized cardiac surgery patients. Secondary analyses of 1999-2019 National Inpatient Sample data were performed using 969,034 records (68% male, mean age: 65 years) representing adult cardiac surgery patients in the United States. A subgroup of 323,929 records corresponded to patients with congestive heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, mitral/tricuspid valve disease and/or combined surgeries. We evaluated PAC in relation to clinical outcomes using regression and targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE). Hospitalized cardiac surgery patients experienced more in-hospital deaths and longer stays if they had ≥ 1 subgroup characteristics. For risk-adjusted models, in-hospital deaths were similar among recipients and non-recipients of PAC (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96, 1.12), although PAC was associated with more in-hospital deaths among the subgroup with congestive heart failure (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03, 1.26). PAC recipients experienced shorter stays than non-recipients (β =  - 0.40, 95% CI - 0.64, - 0.15), with variations by subgroup. We obtained comparable results using TMLE. In this retrospective cohort study, PAC was associated with shorter stays and similar in-hospital death rates among cardiac surgery patients. Worse clinical outcomes associated with PAC were observed only among patients with congestive heart failure. Prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm and extend these preliminary findings.

Development of the Modern Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit and Current Management

The modern cardiothoracic intensive care unit (CTICU) developed as a result of advances in critical care, cardiology, and cardiac surgery. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery today are sicker, frailer, and have more complex cardiac and noncardiac morbidities. CTICU providers need to understand postoperative implications of different surgical procedures, complications that can occur in CTICU patients, resuscitation protocols for cardiac arrest, and diagnostic and therapeutic interventions such as transesophageal echocardiography and mechanical circulatory support. Optimum CTICU care requires a multidisciplinary team with collaboration between cardiac surgeons and critical care physicians with training and experience in the care of CTICU patients.

Association of low mixed venous oxygen saturations during early ICU stay with increased 30-day and 1-year mortality after cardiac surgery: a single-center retrospective study

Background

Low postoperative mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO₂) values have been linked to poor outcomes after cardiac surgery. The present study was designed to assess whether SvO₂ values of < 60% at intensive care unit (ICU) admission and 4 h after admission are associated with increased mortality after cardiac surgery.

Methods

During the years 2007–2020, 7046 patients (74.4% male; median age, 68 years [interquartile range, 60–74]) underwent cardiac surgery at an academic medical center in Finland. All patients were monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter. SvO₂ values were obtained at ICU admission and 4 h later. Patients were divided into four groups for analyses: SvO₂ ≥ 60% at ICU admission and 4 h later; SvO₂ ≥ 60% at admission but < 60% at 4 h; SvO₂ < 60% at admission but ≥ 60% at 4 h; and SvO₂ < 60% at both ICU admission and 4 h later. Kaplan–Meier survival curves, Cox regression models, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to assess differences among groups in 30-day and 1-year mortality.

Results

In the overall cohort, 52.9% underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 29.1% valvular surgery, 12.1% combined CABG and valvular procedures, 3.5% surgery of the ascending aorta or aortic dissection, and 2.4% other cardiac surgery. The 1-year crude mortality was 4.3%. The best outcomes were associated with SvO₂ ≥ 60% at both ICU admission and 4 h later. Hazard ratios for 1-year mortality were highest among patients with SvO₂ < 60% at both ICU admission and 4 h later, regardless of surgical subgroup.

Conclusion

SvO₂ values < 60% at ICU admission and 4 h after admission are associated with increased 30-day and 1-year mortality after cardiac surgery. Goal-directed therapy protocols targeting SvO₂ ≥ 60% may be beneficial. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these observational findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01862-8.

Early pulmonary artery catheterization is not associated with survival benefits in critically ill patients with cardiac disease: An analysis of the MIMIC-IV database

BACKGROUND

Many studies demonstrated no improved survival in patients with pulmonary artery catheter placement. However, no consistent conclusions have been drawn regarding the impact of pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients with heart disease. This study aimed to investigate the association of early pulmonary artery catheter use with 28-day mortality in that population.

METHODS

The Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database, a single-center critical care database, was employed to investigate this issue. This study enrolled a total of 11,887 critically ill patients with cardiac disease with or without pulmonary artery catheter insertion. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The multivariate regression was modeled to examine the association between pulmonary artery catheter and outcomes. Additionally, we examined the effect modification by cardiac surgeries. Propensity score matching was conducted to validate our findings.

RESULTS

No improvement in 28-day mortality was observed among the pulmonary artery catheter group compared to the non-pulmonary artery catheter group (odds ratio 95% confidence interval: 1.18 [1.00-1.38], P = .049). When stratified by cardiac surgeries, the results were consistent. The patients in the pulmonary artery catheter group had fewer ventilation-free days and vasopressor-free days than those in the nonpulmonary artery catheter group after surgery stratification. In the surgical patients, pulmonary artery catheter insertion was not associated with the occurrence of acute kidney injury, and it was associated with a higher daily fluid input (mean difference 95% confidence interval: 0.13 [0.05-0.20], P = .001). In nonsurgical patients, the pulmonary artery catheter group had a higher risk of acute kidney injury occurrence (odds ratio 95% confidence interval: 1.94 [1.32-2.84], P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Early pulmonary artery catheter placement is not associated with survival benefits in critically ill patients with cardiac diseases, either in surgical or nonsurgical patients.

2021: Perioperative and Critical Care Year in Review for the Cardiothoracic Surgery Team

For yet another year, our lives have been dominated by a pandemic. This year in review, we feature an expert panel opinion regarding extracorporeal support in the context of COVID-19, challenging previously held standards. We also feature survey results assessing the impact of the pandemic on cardiac surgical volume. Furthermore, we focus on a single center experience that evaluated the use of pulmonary artery catheters and the comparison of transfusion strategies in the Restrictive and Liberal Transfusion Strategies in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction (REALITY) trial. Additionally, we address the impact of acute kidney injury on cardiac surgery and highlight the controversy regarding the choice of fluid resuscitation. We close with an evaluation of dysphagia in cardiac surgery and the impact of prehabilitation to optimize surgical outcomes.

The Pulmonary Artery Catheter in the Perioperative Setting: Should It Still Be Used?

The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) was introduced into clinical practice in the 1970s and was initially used to monitor patients with acute myocardial infarctions. The indications for using the PAC quickly expanded to critically ill patients in the intensive care unit as well as in the perioperative setting in patients undergoing major cardiac and noncardiac surgery. The utilization of the PAC is surrounded by multiple controversies, with literature claiming its benefits in the perioperative setting, and other publications showing no benefit. The right interpretation of the hemodynamic parameters measured by the PAC and its clinical implications are of the utmost essence in order to guide a specific therapy. Even though clinical trials have not shown a reduction in mortality with the use of the PAC, it still remains a valuable tool in a wide variety of clinical settings. In general, the right selection of the patient population (high-risk patients with or without hemodynamic instability undergoing high-risk procedures) as well as the right clinical setting (centers with experience and expertise) are essential in order for the patient to benefit most from PAC use.