1
|
Gaudino M, Flather M, Capodanno D, Milojevic M, Bhatt DL, Biondi Zoccai G, Boden WE, Devereaux PJ, Doenst T, Farkouh M, Freemantle N, Fremes S, Puskas J, Landoni G, Lawton J, Myers PO, Redfors B, Sandner S. European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) expert consensus statement on perioperative myocardial infarction after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 65:ezad415. [PMID: 38420786 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiac surgery may lead to myocardial damage and release of cardiac biomarkers through various mechanisms such as cardiac manipulation, systemic inflammation, myocardial hypoxia, cardioplegic arrest and ischaemia caused by coronary or graft occlusion. Defining perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI) after cardiac surgery presents challenges, and the association between the current PMI definitions and postoperative outcomes remains uncertain. To address these challenges, the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) facilitated collaboration among a multidisciplinary group to evaluate the existing evidence on the mechanisms, diagnosis and prognostic implications of PMI after cardiac surgery. The review found that the postoperative troponin value thresholds associated with an increased risk of mortality are markedly higher than those proposed by all the current definitions of PMI. Additionally, it was found that large postoperative increases in cardiac biomarkers are prognostically relevant even in absence of additional supportive signs of ischaemia. A new algorithm for PMI detection after cardiac surgery was also proposed, and a consensus was reached within the group that establishing a prognostically relevant definition of PMI is critically needed in the cardiovascular field and that PMI should be included in the primary composite outcome of coronary intervention trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Gaudino
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marcus Flather
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- Department of Medicine, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Davide Capodanno
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Milan Milojevic
- Department of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiovascular Research, Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy
- Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Naples, Italy
| | - William E Boden
- VA New England Healthcare System, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - P J Devereaux
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Michael Farkouh
- Academic Affairs, Cedars-Sinai Health System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nicholas Freemantle
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Fremes
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John Puskas
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Morningside, New York, NY, USA
| | - Giovanni Landoni
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Jennifer Lawton
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Patrick O Myers
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, CHUV-Center Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Björn Redfors
- Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Sigrid Sandner
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gaudino M, Dangas GD, Angiolillo DJ, Brodt J, Chikwe J, DeAnda A, Hameed I, Rodgers ML, Sandner S, Sun LY, Yong CM. Considerations on the Management of Acute Postoperative Ischemia After Cardiac Surgery: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2023; 148:442-454. [PMID: 37345559 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
Acute postoperative myocardial ischemia (PMI) after cardiac surgery is an infrequent event that can evolve rapidly and become a potentially life-threatening complication. Multiple factors are associated with acute PMI after cardiac surgery and may vary by the type of surgical procedure performed. Although the criteria defining nonprocedural myocardial ischemia are well established, there are no universally accepted criteria for the diagnosis of acute PMI. In addition, current evidence on the management of acute PMI after cardiac surgery is sparse and generally of low methodological quality. Once acute PMI is suspected, prompt diagnosis and treatment are imperative, and options range from conservative strategies to percutaneous coronary intervention and redo coronary artery bypass grafting. In this document, a multidisciplinary group including experts in cardiac surgery, cardiology, anesthesiology, and postoperative care summarizes the existing evidence on diagnosis and treatment of acute PMI and provides clinical guidance.
Collapse
|
3
|
Masraf H, Sef D, Chin SL, Hunduma G, Trkulja V, Miskolczi S, Velissaris T, Luthra S. Long-Term Survival among Octogenarians Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement with or without Simultaneous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A 22-Year Tertiary Single-Center Experience. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4841. [PMID: 37510956 PMCID: PMC10381828 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on aortic valve replacement (AVR) in octogenarians is still debated. We analyzed the characteristics and long-term survival of octogenarians undergoing isolated AVR and AVR + CABG. METHODS All octogenarians who consecutively underwent AVR with or without concomitant CABG at our tertiary cardiac center between 2000 and 2022 were included. Patients with redo, emergent, or any other concomitant procedures were excluded. The primary endpoints were 30-day and long-term survival. The secondary endpoints were early postoperative outcomes and determinants of long-term survival. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of 30-day mortality, and Cox regression analysis was performed for predictors of adverse long-term survival. RESULTS A total of 1011 patients who underwent AVR (83.0 [81.0-85.0] years, 42.0% males) and 1055 with AVR + CABG (83.0 [81.2-85.4] years, 66.1% males) were included in our study. Survival at 30 days and at 1, 3, and 5 years in the AVR group was 97.9%, 91.5%, 80.5%, and 66.2%, respectively, while in the AVR + CABG group it was 96.2%, 89.6%, 77.7%, and 64.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in median postoperative survival between the AVR and AVR + CABG groups (7.1 years [IQR: 6.7-7.5] vs. 6.6 years [IQR: 6.3-7.2], respectively, p = 0.21). Significant predictors of adverse long-term survival in the AVR group included age (hazard ratio (HR): 1.09; 95% CI: 1.06-1.12, p < 0.001), previous MI (HR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.32-3.28, p = 0.002), and chronic kidney disease (HR 2.07; 95% CI: 1.33-3.23, p = 0.001), while in the AVR + CABG group they included age (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04-1.10, p < 0.001) and diabetes mellitus (HR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.15-1.89, p = 0.002). Concomitant CABG was not an independent risk factor for adverse long-term survival (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77-1.02, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS The long-term survival of octogenarians who underwent AVR or AVR + CABG was similar and was not affected by adding concomitant CABG. However, octogenarians who underwent concomitant CABG with AVR had significantly higher in-hospital mortality. Each decision should be discussed within the heart team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Masraf
- Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Davorin Sef
- Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Sirr Ling Chin
- Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Gabriel Hunduma
- Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | | | - Szabolcs Miskolczi
- Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Theodore Velissaris
- Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Suvitesh Luthra
- Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Spadaccio C, Rose D, Nenna A, Taylor R, Bittar MN. Early Re-Exploration versus Conservative Management for Postoperative Bleeding in Stable Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Matched Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12093327. [PMID: 37176767 PMCID: PMC10179715 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative bleeding requiring re-exploration in cardiac surgery has been associated with complications impacting short-term outcomes and perioperative survival. Many aspects of decision-making for re-exploration still remain controversial, especially in hemodynamically stable patients with significant but not acutely cumulating chest drain output. We investigated the impact of re-exploratory surgery on short-term outcomes in a "borderline population" of CABG patients who experienced significant non-acute bleeding, but that were not in critically hemodynamic unstable conditions. METHODS A prospectively collected database of 8287 patients undergoing primary isolated elective CABG was retrospectively interrogated. A population of hemodynamically stable patients experiencing significant non-acute or rapidly cumulating bleeding (>1000 mL of blood loss in 12 h, <200 mL per hour in the first 5 h) with normal platelet and coagulation tests was identified (N = 1642). Patients belonging to this group were re-explored (N = 252) or treated conservatively (N = 1390) based on the decision of the consultant surgeon. Clinical outcomes according to the decision-making strategy were compared using a propensity score matching (PSM) approach. RESULTS After PSM, reoperated patients exhibited significantly higher overall blood product consumption (88.4% vs. 52.6% for red packed cells, p = 0.001). The reoperated group experienced higher rates of respiratory complications (odds ratio 5.8 [4.29-7.86] with p = 0.001 for prolonged ventilation), prolonged stay in intensive care unit (coefficient 1.66 [0.64-2.67] with p = 0.001) and overall length of stay in hospital (coefficient 2.16 [0.42-3.91] with p = 0.015) when compared to conservative management. Reoperated patients had significantly increased risk of multiorgan failure (odds ratio 4.59 [1.37-15.42] with p = 0.014) and a trend towards increased perioperative mortality (odds ratio 3.12 [1.08-8.99] with p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS Conservative management in hemodynamically stable patients experiencing significant but non-critical or emergency bleeding might be a safe and viable option and might be advantageous in terms of reduction of postoperative morbidities and hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiano Spadaccio
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lancashire Cardiac Center, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool FY3 8NR, UK
| | - David Rose
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lancashire Cardiac Center, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool FY3 8NR, UK
| | - Antonio Nenna
- Cardiovascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Rebecca Taylor
- Research and Development, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals, Blackpool FY3 8NR, UK
| | - Mohamad Nidal Bittar
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lancashire Cardiac Center, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool FY3 8NR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Holman WL, Davies JE. Commentary: Chase perfection to catch excellence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 165:697-698. [PMID: 34256955 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.06.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- William L Holman
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala.
| | - James E Davies
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ștefan M, Predoi C, Goicea R, Filipescu D. Volatile Anaesthesia versus Total Intravenous Anaesthesia for Cardiac Surgery—A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11206031. [PMID: 36294353 PMCID: PMC9604446 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11206031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent research has contested the previously accepted paradigm that volatile anaesthetics improve outcomes in cardiac surgery patients when compared to intravenous anaesthesia. In this review we summarise the mechanisms of myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury and cardioprotection in cardiac surgery. In addition, we make a comprehensive analysis of evidence comparing outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery under volatile or intravenous anaesthesia, in terms of mortality and morbidity (cardiac, neurological, renal, pulmonary).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihai Ștefan
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, “Prof Dr CC Iliescu” Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, 022322 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence:
| | - Cornelia Predoi
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, “Prof Dr CC Iliescu” Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, 022322 Bucharest, Romania
- Discipline of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Raluca Goicea
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, “Prof Dr CC Iliescu” Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, 022322 Bucharest, Romania
- Discipline of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Daniela Filipescu
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, “Prof Dr CC Iliescu” Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, 022322 Bucharest, Romania
- Discipline of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zangrillo A, Lomivorotov VV, Pasyuga VV, Belletti A, Gazivoda G, Monaco F, Nigro Neto C, Likhvantsev VV, Bradic N, Lozovskiy A, Lei C, Bukamal NAR, Silva FS, Bautin AE, Ma J, Yong CY, Carollo C, Kunstyr J, Wang CY, Grigoryev EV, Riha H, Wang C, El-Tahan MR, Scandroglio AM, Mansor M, Lembo R, Ponomarev DN, Bezerra FJL, Ruggeri L, Chernyavskiy AM, Xu J, Tarasov DG, Navalesi P, Yavorovskiy A, Bove T, Kuzovlev A, Hajjar LA, Landoni G. Effect of Volatile Anesthetics on Myocardial Infarction After Coronary Artery Surgery: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2022; 36:2454-2462. [PMID: 35168907 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of volatile anesthetics on the rates of postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiac death after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). DESIGN A post hoc analysis of a randomized trial. SETTING Cardiac surgical operating rooms. PARTICIPANTS Patients undergoing elective, isolated CABG. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive a volatile anesthetic (desflurane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane) or total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). The primary outcome was hemodynamically relevant MI (MI requiring high-dose inotropic support or prolonged intensive care unit stay) occurring within 48 hours from surgery. The secondary outcome was 1-year death due to cardiac causes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS A total of 5,400 patients were enrolled between April 2014 and September 2017 (2,709 patients randomized to the volatile anesthetics group and 2,691 to TIVA). The mean age was 62 ± 8.4 years, and the median baseline ejection fraction was 57% (50-67), without differences between the 2 groups. Patients in the volatile group had a lower incidence of MI with hemodynamic complications both in the per-protocol (14 of 2,530 [0.6%] v 27 of 2,501 [1.1%] in the TIVA group; p = 0.038) and as-treated analyses (16 of 2,708 [0.6%] v 29 of 2,617 [1.1%] in the TIVA group; p = 0.039), but not in the intention-to-treat analysis (17 of 2,663 [0.6%] v 28 of 2,667 [1.0%] in the TIVA group; p = 0.10). Overall, deaths due to cardiac causes were lower in the volatile group (23 of 2,685 [0.9%] v 40 of 2,668 [1.5%] than in the TIVA group; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS An anesthetic regimen, including volatile agents, may be associated with a lower rate of postoperative MI with hemodynamic complication in patients undergoing CABG. Furthermore, it may reduce long-term cardiac mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Zangrillo
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Vladimir V Lomivorotov
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Vadim V Pasyuga
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery Astrakhan, Astrakhan, Russia
| | - Alessandro Belletti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Gordana Gazivoda
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cardiovascular Institute Dedinje, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Fabrizio Monaco
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Caetano Nigro Neto
- Anesthesia Section, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Valery V Likhvantsev
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; V. Negovsky Reanimatology Research Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Nikola Bradic
- Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia; Department of Biomedical Sciences, University North, Varazdin, Croatia
| | - Andrey Lozovskiy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ural Institute of Cardiology, Ekaterinburg, Russia
| | - Chong Lei
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Nazar A R Bukamal
- Cardiothoracic ICU and Anesthesia Department, Mohammed Bin Khalifa Cardiac Center, Riffa, Bahrain
| | | | - Andrey E Bautin
- Laboratory for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Almazov National Medical Research Center, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Jun Ma
- Center for Anesthesiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chow Yen Yong
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hospital Pulau Pinang, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
| | - Cristiana Carollo
- Institute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Jan Kunstyr
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Chew Yin Wang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Evgeny V Grigoryev
- Intensive Care Unit, Scientific Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia
| | - Hynek Riha
- Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Chengbin Wang
- Center for Anesthesiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Mohamed R El-Tahan
- Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Anna Mara Scandroglio
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Marzida Mansor
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Rosalba Lembo
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Dmitry N Ponomarev
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Francisco José Lucena Bezerra
- Anesthesia Section, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Laura Ruggeri
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexander M Chernyavskiy
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Junmei Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Dmitry G Tarasov
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery Astrakhan, Astrakhan, Russian Federation
| | - Paolo Navalesi
- Institute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy; Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Andrey Yavorovskiy
- Federal Research and Clinical Center of Resuscitation and Rehabilitation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Tiziana Bove
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, ASUFC University-Hospital of Central Friuli, Udine, Italy
| | - Artem Kuzovlev
- V. Negovsky Reanimatology Research Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ludhmila A Hajjar
- Department of Cardiopneumology, Instituto do Coração, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Intensive Care Unit, Hospital SirioLibanes, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Giovanni Landoni
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|