1
|
Blyth KG, Adusumilli PS, Astoul P, Darlison L, Lee YCG, Mansfield AS, Marciniak SJ, Maskell N, Panou V, Peikert T, Rahman NM, Zauderer MG, Sterman D, Fennell DA. Leveraging the pleural space for anticancer therapies in pleural mesothelioma. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2024; 12:476-483. [PMID: 38740045 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00111-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Most patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM) present with symptomatic pleural effusion. In some patients, PM is only detectable on the pleural surfaces, providing a strong rationale for intrapleural anticancer therapy. In modern prospective studies involving expert radiological staging and specialist multidisciplinary teams, the population incidence of stage I PM (an approximate surrogate of pleura-only PM) is higher than in historical retrospective series. In this Viewpoint, we advocate for the expansion of intrapleural trials to serve these patients, given the paucity of data supporting licensed systemic therapies in this setting and the uncertainties involved in surgical therapy. We begin by reviewing the unique anatomical and physiological features of the PM-bearing pleural space, before critically appraising the evidence for systemic therapies in stage I PM and previous intrapleural PM trials. We conclude with a summary of key challenges and potential solutions, including optimal trial designs, repurposing of indwelling pleural catheters, and new technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin G Blyth
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK; Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Glasgow, UK.
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Cellular Therapeutics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philippe Astoul
- Thoracic Oncology Department, Hôpital NORD, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | | | - Y C Gary Lee
- University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Stefan J Marciniak
- Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nick Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Vasiliki Panou
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Odense Respiratory Research Unit, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Respiratory Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Tobias Peikert
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Najib M Rahman
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Marjorie G Zauderer
- Cellular Therapeutics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Sterman
- New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dean A Fennell
- University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cerbone L, Delfanti S, Crivellari S, De Angelis AM, Mazzeo L, Proto C, Occhipinti M, Lo Russo G, Dellepiane C, Biello F, Alabiso I, Verderame F, Gauna R, De Simone I, Cuppone F, Petraglia S, Pasello G, Ceresoli GL, Garassino MC, Torri V, Grosso F. Nivolumab in pretreated pleural mesothelioma: Results from an observational real-world study of patients treated within the AIFA 5% Fund. TUMORI JOURNAL 2024; 110:168-173. [PMID: 38372045 DOI: 10.1177/03008916241229287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pleural mesothelioma is a rare cancer with a dismal prognosis and few therapeutic options, especially in the pretreated setting. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors as single agents yielded interesting results in refractory pleural mesothelioma, achieving a response rate between 10-20%, median progression-free survival of 2-5 months and median overall survival of 7-13 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective, multi-institutional study of pleural mesothelioma patients treated with nivolumab in second and further line was performed. The endpoints of the study are response rate, disease control rate, progression free survival and overall survival. RESULTS Sixty-five patients with pleural mesothelioma treated with nivolumab in second and further line were enrolled at seven Italian institutions. The response rate was 8%, disease control rate was 37%, median progression free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI: 2.9-9.0) and median overall survival was 11.1 (95% CI 6.2-19.9) months. A higher neutrophils and neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio at baseline were associated with worse prognosis. CONCLUSION Nivolumab as a single agent is fairly active in a cohort of unselected pretreated pleural mesothelioma patients. Further investigations on clinical and translational factors are needed to define which patient might benefit most from nivolumab treatment in pleural mesothelioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Cerbone
- Mesothelioma Unit AO SS, Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Sara Delfanti
- Mesothelioma Unit AO SS, Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Stefania Crivellari
- Mesothelioma Unit AO SS, Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
- Projects, Investigation and Innovation Unit, Ospedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero, Verduno, Italy
| | | | - Laura Mazzeo
- Medical Oncology Department 1, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Claudia Proto
- Medical Oncology Department 1, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Mario Occhipinti
- Medical Oncology Department 1, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lo Russo
- Medical Oncology Department 1, Fondazione IRCCS - Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Chiara Dellepiane
- Lung Cancer Unit, Oncology Unit 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Federica Biello
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Irene Alabiso
- Oncology Unit 2, Presidio Ospedaliero S. Giovanni Bosco, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Città Di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Verderame
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti PO Vincenzo Cervello, Palermo, Italy
| | - Roberta Gauna
- Oncology Unit, Ospedale Degli Infermi, Ponderano, Italy
| | - Irene De Simone
- Clinical Oncology Department, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cuppone
- Pre-Authorisation Department, Italian Medicines Agency, Rome, Italy
| | - Sandra Petraglia
- Pre-Authorisation Department, Italian Medicines Agency, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Pasello
- Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy 12Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Italy
| | | | - Marina Chiara Garassino
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Valter Torri
- Clinical Oncology Department, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Grosso
- Mesothelioma Unit AO SS, Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Armato SG, Katz SI, Frauenfelder T, Jayasekera G, Catino A, Blyth KG, Theodoro T, Rousset P, Nackaerts K, Opitz I. Imaging in pleural Mesothelioma: A review of the 16th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer 2024; 193:107832. [PMID: 38875938 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
Imaging continues to gain a greater role in the assessment and clinical management of patients with mesothelioma. This communication summarizes the oral presentations from the imaging session at the 2023 International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group (iMig), which was held in Lille, France from June 26 to 28, 2023. Topics at this session included an overview of best practices for clinical imaging of mesothelioma as reported by an iMig consensus panel, emerging imaging techniques for surgical planning, radiologic assessment of malignant pleural effusion, a radiomics-based transfer learning model to predict patient response to treatment, automated assessment of early contrast enhancement, and tumor thickness for response assessment in peritoneal mesothelioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel G Armato
- Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Sharyn I Katz
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thomas Frauenfelder
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Geeshath Jayasekera
- Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK and School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Annamaria Catino
- Medical Thoracic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II," BARI, Italy
| | - Kevin G Blyth
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Glasgow, UK and Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK and School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Taylla Theodoro
- Institute of Computing, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil and Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Pascal Rousset
- Department of Radiology, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon 1 University, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Kristiaan Nackaerts
- Department of Pulmonology/Respiratory Oncology, KU Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ghirardelli P, Costantino G, Franceschini D, Villa E, Guaineri A, Scorsetti M, Vavassori V, Ceresoli GL. STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY FOR OLIGO-PROGRESSIVE PLEURAL MESOTHELIOMA: FINE-TUNING THE OPTIMAL DOSES. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00136-X. [PMID: 38815652 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
There is growing evidence of a role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of patients with oligo-progressive pleural mesothelioma (PM). The objective of this study was to investigate the optimal RT doses and schedules in this setting. The records of patients treated with SBRT (> 5 Gy per fraction) for oligo-progression of PM at two Institutions from June 2014 to September 2022 were reviewed. Patients were divided in two groups: "intermediate-dose" SBRT (i-SBRT, total dose 30-36 Gy in 5-6 fractions), and "high-dose" SBRT (h-SBRT, total dose 45-50 Gy in 4-8 fractions). The comparison between the two groups in terms of local control (LC) and toxicity was the primary endpoint of the study. Overall, 23 patients were treated on 25 pleural lesions. All had received upfront chemotherapy with platinum/pemetrexed. Fifteen patients were treated with i-SBRT and 8 patients with h-SBRT. The median equivalent dose (EQD2) was 40 Gy (range 40-49.6) in the i-SBRT group and 74.46 Gy (range 64-88) in the h-SBRT group. Six-month, 1-year and 2-year LC were 100%, 100% and 80% in the i-SBRT group and 100%, 100% and 67% in the h-SBRT group, respectively (p=0.94). Only two patients (one for each dose group) had a recurrence in the RT field, both after experiencing distant relapse. No severe acute and late toxicities were observed in the i-SBRT group, while in the h-SBRT group 2 patients experienced a G2 acute and late thoracic pain and one patient developed a G2 acute and G3 chronic thoracic pain. In our experience, SBRT is a safe and effective option for selected patients with oligo-progressive PM. Use of intermediate total doses keeping the dose per fraction high seems to offer an excellent LC, avoiding the risk of severe toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Ghirardelli
- Department of Radiotherapy, Humanitas Gavazzeni Clinic, Bergamo, Italy.
| | | | - Davide Franceschini
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Villa
- Department of Radiotherapy, Humanitas Gavazzeni Clinic, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yuce TH, Ak G, Metintas S, Dundar E, Roe OD, Panou V, Metintas M. BAP1, Wilms' tumor 1, and calretinin in predicting survival and response to first-line chemotherapy in patients with pleural mesothelioma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:38. [PMID: 38280040 PMCID: PMC10821830 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05565-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are currently no methods to predict response to chemotherapy in pleural mesothelioma (PM). The aim of this study is to investigate the predictive and prognostic role of BAP1, WT1 and calretinin expression and their combinations in pre-treatment tumor samples by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. METHODS The study included consecutive PM patients treated with chemotherapy alone at a University hospital between 2009 and 2020. BAP1 analyses were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples of the patients, while WT1 and calretinin information were obtained from the histopathological diagnosis records. RESULTS Of the total 107 patients included, 64% had loss of BAP1 expression, whereas 77% had WT1 and 86% had calretinin expression. Patients with the presence of BAP1 expression, one or both of the other two markers, or loss of expression of all three markers (unfavorable status) were more likely to not respond to chemotherapy than those with the presence of all three markers or loss of BAP1 expression and expression of one or two other markers (favorable status) (p = 0.001). Median survival time of patients with favorable and unfavorable status was 15 ± 1.7 and 8.0 ± 2.4 months, respectively (p = 0.027). After adjustment for histopathology and stage, loss of BAP1 (HR = 0.54, 95%CI 0.35-0.83), WT1 (1.75, 1.06-2.90), calretinin (2.09, 1.14-3.84) expression and favourable panel (0.50, 0.27-0.92) was associated with prognosis. CONCLUSIONS The IHC biomarkers BAP1, WT1, and calretinin, used in the routine diagnosis of PM and their combinations, are the first biomarkers associated with response to chemotherapy and may be a useful tool to select patients for first-line platinum pemetrexed treatment in PM patients. Validation in a large cohort is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuna Han Yuce
- Department of Chest Diseases, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Medical Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Guntulu Ak
- Department of Chest Diseases, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Medical Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkey
- Lung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Selma Metintas
- Lung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
- Department of Public Health, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Medical Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Emine Dundar
- Lung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
- Department of Pathology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Medical Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Oluf Dimitri Roe
- Department of Oncology, Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Vasiliki Panou
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Odense Respiratory Research Unit (ODIN), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Muzaffer Metintas
- Department of Chest Diseases, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Medical Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkey.
- Lung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gabelloni M, Faggioni L, Brunese MC, Picone C, Fusco R, Aquaro GD, Cioni D, Neri E, Gandolfo N, Giovagnoni A, Granata V. An overview on multimodal imaging for the diagnostic workup of pleural mesothelioma. Jpn J Radiol 2024; 42:16-27. [PMID: 37676382 PMCID: PMC10764410 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-023-01480-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive disease that has a strong causal relationship with asbestos exposure and represents a major challenge from both a diagnostic and therapeutic viewpoint. Despite recent improvements in patient care, PM typically carries a poor outcome, especially in advanced stages. Therefore, a timely and effective diagnosis taking advantage of currently available imaging techniques is essential to perform an accurate staging and dictate the most appropriate treatment strategy. Our aim is to provide a brief, but exhaustive and up-to-date overview of the role of multimodal medical imaging in the management of PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Gabelloni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Faggioni
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Neurosciences, University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Carmine Picone
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Donato Aquaro
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Dania Cioni
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Emanuele Neri
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Gandolfo
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, Villa Scassi Hospital-ASL 3, 16149, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Delle Marche", 60126, Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Martella S, Aiello MM, Bertaglia V, Cau R, Denaro N, Cadoni A, Novello S, Scartozzi M, Novello G, Soto Parra HJ, Saba L, Solinas C, Porcu M. Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Staging and Radiological Response Criteria in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Target Oncol 2024; 19:13-28. [PMID: 38063957 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-023-01017-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and challenging cancer associated with asbestos fiber exposure, which offers limited treatment options. Historically, platinum-based chemotherapy has been the primary approach, but recent developments have introduced immunotherapy as a promising alternative for the treatment of this disease. Nevertheless, the unique growth patterns and occasionally ambiguous progressive characteristics of MPM make the interpretation of radiological assessments complex. Immunotherapy further complicates matters by introducing unconventional treatment response patterns such as hyperprogression and pseudoprogression. Consequently, there is a growing imperative to integrate the standard RECIST criteria with the mesothelioma-specific mRECIST criteria (version 1.1), as outlined in iRECIST. This comprehensive review is driven by the intent to provide a valuable resource for radiologists and clinicians engaged in the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of MPM in the era of immunotherapy. Specifically, the current imaging methods employed for staging and follow-up will be exposed and discussed, with a focus on the technical specificities and the mRECIST 1.1 methodology. Furthermore, we will provide a discussion about major clinical trials related to the use of immunotherapy in MPM patients. Finally, the latest advancements in radiomics, the applications of artificial intelligence in MPM, and their potential impact on clinical practice for prognosis and therapy, are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serafina Martella
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Policlinico San Marco, Catania, Italy
| | - Marco Maria Aiello
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Policlinico San Marco, Catania, Italy
| | - Valentina Bertaglia
- Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Cau
- Department of Radiology, AOU Cagliari, S.S: 554, km 4,500, CAP: 09042, Monserrato (CA), Italy
| | - Nerina Denaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Cadoni
- Department of Medical Oncology, AOU Cagliari, Monserrato (CA), Italy
| | - Silvia Novello
- Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Mario Scartozzi
- Department of Medical Oncology, AOU Cagliari, Monserrato (CA), Italy
| | - Giuseppe Novello
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Policlinico San Marco, Catania, Italy
| | - Hector Josè Soto Parra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Policlinico San Marco, Catania, Italy
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, AOU Cagliari, S.S: 554, km 4,500, CAP: 09042, Monserrato (CA), Italy
| | - Cinzia Solinas
- Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Porcu
- Department of Radiology, AOU Cagliari, S.S: 554, km 4,500, CAP: 09042, Monserrato (CA), Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chu Q, Perrone F, Greillier L, Tu W, Piccirillo MC, Grosso F, Lo Russo G, Florescu M, Mencoboni M, Morabito A, Cecere FL, Ceresoli GL, Dawe DE, Zucali PA, Pagano M, Goffin JR, Sanchez ML, Gridelli C, Zalcman G, Quantin X, Westeel V, Gargiulo P, Delfanti S, Tu D, Lee CW, Leighl N, Sederias J, Brown-Walker P, Luo Y, Lantuejoul S, Tsao MS, Scherpereel A, Bradbury P, Laurie SA, Seymour L. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in untreated advanced pleural mesothelioma in Canada, Italy, and France: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2023; 402:2295-2306. [PMID: 37931632 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01613-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pleural mesothelioma usually presents at an advanced, incurable stage. Chemotherapy with platinum-pemetrexed is a standard treatment. We hypothesised that the addition of pembrolizumab to platinum-pemetrexed would improve overall survival in patients with pleural mesothelioma. METHODS We did this open-label, international, randomised phase 3 trial at 51 hospitals in Canada, Italy, and France. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, with previously untreated advanced pleural mesothelioma, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous chemotherapy (cisplatin [75 mg/m2] or carboplatin [area under the concentration-time curve 5-6 mg/mL per min] with pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles), with or without intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (up to 2 years). The primary endpoint was overall survival in all randomly assigned patients; safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study therapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02784171, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS Between Jan 31, 2017, and Sept 4, 2020, 440 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to chemotherapy alone (n=218) or chemotherapy with pembrolizumab (n=222). 333 (76 %) of patients were male, 347 (79%) were White, and median age was 71 years (IQR 66-75). At final analysis (database lock Dec 15, 2022), with a median follow-up of 16·2 months (IQR 8·3-27·8), overall survival was significantly longer with pembrolizumab (median overall survival 17·3 months [95% CI 14·4-21·3] with pembrolizumab vs 16·1 months [13·1-18·2] with chemotherapy alone, hazard ratio for death 0·79; 95% CI 0·64-0·98, two-sided p=0·0324). 3-year overall survival rate was 25% (95% CI 20-33%) with pembrolizumab and 17% (13-24%) with chemotherapy alone. Adverse events related to study treatment of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 60 (27%) of 222 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 32 (15%) of 211 patients in the chemotherapy alone group. Hospital admissions for serious adverse events related to one or more study drugs were reported in 40 (18%) of 222 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 12 (6%) of 211 patients in the chemotherapy alone group. Grade 5 adverse events related to one or more drugs occurred in two patients on the pembrolizumab group and one patient in the chemotherapy alone group. INTERPRETATION In patients with advanced pleural mesothelioma, the addition of pembrolizumab to standard platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy was tolerable and resulted in a significant improvement in overall survival. This regimen is a new treatment option for previously untreated advanced pleural mesothelioma. FUNDING The Canadian Cancer Society and Merck & Co.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quincy Chu
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Francesco Perrone
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Laurent Greillier
- Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France; Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France; L'Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Marseille, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Marseille, France; Cancer Research Centre of Marseille, Marseille, France; Hôpital Nord, Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations, Marseille, France
| | - Wei Tu
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Maria Carmela Piccirillo
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Federica Grosso
- Mesothelioma and Rare Cancer Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | | | - Marie Florescu
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Manlio Mencoboni
- Unit di Oncologia Ospedale Villa Scassi, Genova Sampierdarena, Italy
| | - Alessandro Morabito
- Oncologia Clinica e Sperimentale Toraco-polmonare, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Paolo Andrea Zucali
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Department of Oncology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Pagano
- Oncologia Medica IRCCS Arcispedale Maria Nuova Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - John R Goffin
- Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Cesare Gridelli
- Azienda Ospedaliera San Giuseppe Moscati Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica, Avellino, Italy
| | - Gerard Zalcman
- Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Thoracic Oncology Department, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Nord, Paris, France
| | - Xavier Quantin
- Montpellier Cancer Institute and Montpellier Cancer Research Institute, INSERM U1194, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Piera Gargiulo
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Sara Delfanti
- Mesothelioma and Rare Cancer Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Dongsheng Tu
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Natasha Leighl
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joana Sederias
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Sylvie Lantuejoul
- Grenoble Alpes University and Department of Biopathology, Centre Léon Bérard and Netmeso Mesopath Network, Lyon, France
| | - Ming-Sound Tsao
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Penelope Bradbury
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Scott A Laurie
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Lesley Seymour
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yu CD, Zhang K. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:7795-7805. [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i32.7795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is widely accepted as a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of early gastric cancer. However, its role in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of LG vs open gastrectomy (OG) after NAT for the treatment of LAGC.
AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of LG vs OG after NAT for LAGC.
METHODS We conducted a prospective study of 76 patients with LAGC who underwent NAT followed by LG (n = 38) or OG (n = 38) between 2021 and 2023. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), surgical complications, and quality of life (QOL).
RESULTS The two groups had comparable baseline characteristics, with a median follow-up period of 24 mo. The 3-year OS rates in the LG and OG groups were 68.4% and 60.5%, respectively (P = 0.42). The 3-year DFS rates in the LG and OG groups were 57.9% and 50.0%, respectively (P = 0.51). The LG group had significantly less blood loss (P < 0.001), a shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001), and a lower incidence of surgical site infection (P = 0.04) than the OG group. There were no significant differences in other surgical complications between the groups, including anastomotic leakage, intra-abdominal abscess, or wound dehiscence. The LG group had significantly better QOL scores than the OG group regarding physical functioning, role functioning, global health status, fatigue, pain, appetite loss, and body image at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION LG after NAT is a viable and safe alternative to OG for the treatment of LAGC, with similar survival outcomes and superior short-term recovery and QOL. LG patients had less blood loss, shorter hospitalizations, and a lower incidence of surgical site infections than OG patients. Moreover, the LG group had better QOL scores in multiple domains 6 mo postoperatively. Therefore, LG should be considered a valid option for patients with LAGC who undergo NAT, particularly for those who prioritize postoperative recovery and QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang-Da Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Jiujiang First People’s Hospital, Jiujiang 332000, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Ke Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Jiujiang First People’s Hospital, Jiujiang 332000, Jiangxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Douma LAH, Lalezari F, van der Noort V, de Vries JF, Monkhorst K, Smesseim I, Baas P, Schilder B, Vermeulen M, Burgers JA, de Gooijer CJ. Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib in second-line and third-line patients with pleural mesothelioma (PEMMELA): a single-arm phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:1219-1228. [PMID: 37844598 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00446-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, and lenvatinib, an antiangiogenic multikinase inhibitor, shows synergistic activity in preclinical and clinical studies in solid tumours. We assessed the clinical activity of this combination therapy in patients with pleural mesothelioma who progressed after platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy. METHODS In this single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 study, done at the Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) with pleural mesothelioma with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, progression after chemotherapy (no previous immunotherapy), and measurable disease according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (mRECIST) for mesothelioma version 1.1. Patients received 200 mg intravenous pembrolizumab once every 3 weeks plus 20 mg oral lenvatinib once per day for up to 2 years or until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was objective response rate identified by a local investigator according to mRECIST version 1.1. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04287829, and is recruiting for the second cohort. FINDINGS Between March 5, 2021, and Jan 31, 2022, 42 patients were screened, of whom 38 were included in the primary endpoint and safety analyses (median age 71 years [IQR 65-75], 33 [87%] male and five [13%] female) . At data cutoff (Jan 31, 2023), with a median follow-up of 17·7 months (IQR 13·8-19·4), 22 (58%; 95% CI 41-74) of 38 patients had an objective response. The independent review showed an objective response in 17 (45%; 95% CI 29-62) of 38 patients. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in ten (26%) patients, including one treatment-related death due to myocardial infarction. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypertension (eight patients [21%]) and anorexia and lymphopenia (both four patients [11%]). In 29 (76%) of 38 patients, at least one dose reduction or discontinuation of lenvatinib was required. INTERPRETATION Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib showed promising anti-tumour activity in patients with pleural mesothelioma with considerable toxicity, similar to that in previous studies. Available evidence from the literature suggests a high starting dose of lenvatinib for optimal anti-tumour activity. This, however, demands a high standard of supportive care. The combination therapy of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib warrants further investigation in pleural mesothelioma. FUNDING Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Anne H Douma
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ferry Lalezari
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Jeltje F de Vries
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kim Monkhorst
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Illaa Smesseim
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Paul Baas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bodien Schilder
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marrit Vermeulen
- Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jacobus A Burgers
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Amorrortu R, Garcia M, Zhao Y, El Naqa I, Balagurunathan Y, Chen DT, Thieu T, Schabath MB, Rollison DE. Overview of approaches to estimate real-world disease progression in lung cancer. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7:pkad074. [PMID: 37738580 PMCID: PMC10637832 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized clinical trials of novel treatments for solid tumors normally measure disease progression using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. However, novel, scalable approaches to estimate disease progression using real-world data are needed to advance cancer outcomes research. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize examples from the existing literature on approaches to estimate real-world disease progression and their relative strengths and limitations, using lung cancer as a case study. METHODS A narrative literature review was conducted in PubMed to identify articles that used approaches to estimate real-world disease progression in lung cancer patients. Data abstracted included data source, approach used to estimate real-world progression, and comparison to a selected gold standard (if applicable). RESULTS A total of 40 articles were identified from 2008 to 2022. Five approaches to estimate real-world disease progression were identified including manual abstraction of medical records, natural language processing of clinical notes and/or radiology reports, treatment-based algorithms, changes in tumor volume, and delta radiomics-based approaches. The accuracy of these progression approaches were assessed using different methods, including correlations between real-world endpoints and overall survival for manual abstraction (Spearman rank ρ = 0.61-0.84) and area under the curve for natural language processing approaches (area under the curve = 0.86-0.96). CONCLUSIONS Real-world disease progression has been measured in several observational studies of lung cancer. However, comparing the accuracy of methods across studies is challenging, in part, because of the lack of a gold standard and the different methods used to evaluate accuracy. Concerted efforts are needed to define a gold standard and quality metrics for real-world data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melany Garcia
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Yayi Zhao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Department of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Dung-Tsa Chen
- Department of Biostatistics and Bionformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Thanh Thieu
- Department of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Matthew B Schabath
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dana E Rollison
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lin Y, Yang S, Yang W, Cheng H, Chang X, Zhu Z, Feng J, Han J, Ren Q, Chang S, Liu S, Yu T, Hou B, Li P, Meng D, Zhang X, Qin H, Wang H. Pediatric adrenocortical carcinoma: clinical features and application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:411. [PMID: 37814272 PMCID: PMC10563212 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01381-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize the clinical characteristics of children with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) and preliminarily explore the indications for and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in certain patients. METHODS The data of 49 children with adrenocortical tumors (ACT) in the past 15 years were retrospectively analyzed, and after pathology assessment using Weiss system grading, 40 children diagnosed with ACC were included. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of contrast-enhanced computed tomography data were used to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Forty patients (17 males, 23 females) with ACC were enrolled. Abnormal hormone levels were common in children with ACC (n = 31), and in terms of clinical presentation, sexual precocity was the most common (n = 14, 35.0%), followed by Cushing's syndrome (n = 12, 30.0%). Seven of 40 children received neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to a maximum lesion diameter greater than 10 cm (n = 4), invasion of surrounding tissues (n = 2), intravenous tumor thrombus (n = 2), and/or distant metastasis (n = 2); 2 patients achieved partial response, and 5 had stable disease according to the RECIST 1.1 standard. Furthermore, 3D tumor volume reconstruction was performed in 5 children before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor volumes were significantly reduced in all 5 children, with a median volume reduction of 270 (interquartile range, IQR 83, 293) (range: 49-413) ml. After surgery with/without chemotherapy, the 5-year overall survival rate for all children was 90.0% (95% CI-confidence interval 80.0-100.0%), and the 5-year event-free survival rate was 81.5% (95% CI 68.0-97.7%). CONCLUSION In the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric ACC, a comprehensive endocrine evaluation is necessary to facilitate early diagnosis. Surgery and chemotherapy are important components of ACC treatment, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered for children with ACC who meet certain criteria, such as a large tumor, distant metastases, or poor general condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Lin
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Shen Yang
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Wei Yang
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Haiyan Cheng
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Xiaofeng Chang
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Zhiyun Zhu
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Jun Feng
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Jianyu Han
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Qinghua Ren
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Saishuo Chang
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Shan Liu
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Tong Yu
- Medical Imaging Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Boren Hou
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Baoding Children's Hospital, Baoding, 071051, Hebei, China
| | - Pengfei Li
- Department of Pediatric Oncologic Surgery, Henan Children's Hospital, Zhengzhou Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450018, Henan, China
| | - Deguang Meng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Baoding Children's Hospital, Baoding, 071051, Hebei, China
| | - Xianwei Zhang
- Department of Pediatric Oncologic Surgery, Henan Children's Hospital, Zhengzhou Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450018, Henan, China
| | - Hong Qin
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China
| | - Huanmin Wang
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100045, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Murphy PS, Galette P, van der Aart J, Janiczek RL, Patel N, Brown AP. The role of clinical imaging in oncology drug development: progress and new challenges. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20211126. [PMID: 37393537 PMCID: PMC10546429 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20211126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In 2008, the role of clinical imaging in oncology drug development was reviewed. The review outlined where imaging was being applied and considered the diverse demands across the phases of drug development. A limited set of imaging techniques was being used, largely based on structural measures of disease evaluated using established response criteria such as response evaluation criteria in solid tumours. Beyond structure, functional tissue imaging such as dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and metabolic measures using [18F]flourodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography were being increasingly incorporated. Specific challenges related to the implementation of imaging were outlined including standardisation of scanning across study centres and consistency of analysis and reporting. More than a decade on the needs of modern drug development are reviewed, how imaging has evolved to support new drug development demands, the potential to translate state-of-the-art methods into routine tools and what is needed to enable the effective use of this broadening clinical trial toolset. In this review, we challenge the clinical and scientific imaging community to help refine existing clinical trial methods and innovate to deliver the next generation of techniques. Strong industry-academic partnerships and pre-competitive opportunities to co-ordinate efforts will ensure imaging technologies maintain a crucial role delivering innovative medicines to treat cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Galette
- Telix Pharmaceuticals (US) Inc, Fishers, United States
| | | | | | | | - Andrew P. Brown
- Vale Imaging Consultancy Solutions, Harston, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dagogo-Jack I. Targeted Approaches to Treatment of Pleural Mesothelioma: A Review. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2300344. [PMID: 37992257 PMCID: PMC10681489 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive disease that is enriched for inactivating alterations in tumor suppressor genes. Systemic therapeutic strategies for pleural mesothelioma generally involve chemotherapies and immunotherapies that are chosen without consideration of the tumor's molecular profile. As this generalized approach to treatment rarely yields durable responses, alternative therapeutic regimens are urgently indicated. Preclinical studies have identified synthetic lethal protein and metabolic interactions, recurrently overexpressed proteins, and frequent pathway perturbations that may be therapeutically exploited in mesothelioma. This review discusses the mechanism of action of emerging investigational therapies and summarizes findings from phase I-II clinical trials exploring selective, biomarker-driven therapeutic strategies for mesothelioma, with a focus on five common targets. Finally, using lessons learned from these clinical trials, imperatives for successful implementation of targeted therapy in mesothelioma are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ponce S, Cedrés S, Ricordel C, Isambert N, Viteri S, Herrera-Juarez M, Martinez-Marti A, Navarro A, Lederlin M, Serres X, Zugazagoitia J, Vetrhus S, Jaderberg M, Hansen TB, Levitsky V, Paz-Ares L. ONCOS-102 plus pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a randomized phase 2 study investigating clinical outcomes and the tumor microenvironment. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e007552. [PMID: 37661097 PMCID: PMC10476122 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND ONCOS-102, an oncolytic adenovirus expressing granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, can alter the tumor microenvironment to an immunostimulatory state. Combining ONCOS-102 with standard-of-care chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) may improve treatment outcomes. METHODS In this open-label, randomized study, patients with unresectable MPM received intratumoral ONCOS-102 (3×1011 virus particles on days 1, 4, 8, 36, 78, and 120) and pemetrexed plus cisplatin/carboplatin (from day 22), or pemetrexed plus cisplatin/carboplatin alone. The primary endpoint was safety. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, objective response rate, and tumor immunologic activation (baseline and day 36 biopsies) were also assessed. RESULTS In total, 31 patients (safety lead-in: n=6, randomized: n=25) were enrolled. Anemia (15.0% and 27.3%) and neutropenia (40.0% and 45.5%) were the most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) in the ONCOS-102 (n=20) and chemotherapy-alone (n=11) cohorts. No patients discontinued ONCOS-102 due to AEs. No statistically significant difference in efficacy endpoints was observed. There was a numerical improvement in OS (30-month OS rate 34.1% vs 0; median OS 20.3 vs 13.5 months) with ONCOS-102 versus chemotherapy alone in chemotherapy-naïve patients (n=17). By day 36, ONCOS-102 was associated with increased T-cell infiltration and immune-related gene expression that was not observed in the control cohort. Substantial immune activation in the tumor microenvironment was associated with survival at month 18 in the ONCOS-102 cohort. CONCLUSIONS ONCOS-102 plus pemetrexed and cisplatin/carboplatin was well tolerated by patients with MPM. In injected tumors, ONCOS-102 promoted a proinflammatory environment, including T-cell infiltration, which showed association with survival at month 18.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Ponce
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Susana Cedrés
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Charles Ricordel
- Department of Pulmonology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | - Santiago Viteri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Oncológico Rosell, Grupo Quironsalud, Hospital Universitario Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Alex Martinez-Marti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alejandro Navarro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mathieu Lederlin
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Xavier Serres
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jon Zugazagoitia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- H12O-CNIO Lung Cancer Research Unit, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sylvia Vetrhus
- Research and Development, Circio Holding ASA, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | - Luis Paz-Ares
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- H12O-CNIO Lung Cancer Research Unit, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhou N, Bell CS, Feldman HA, Haymaker CL, Hofstetter WL, Tsao AS, Mehran RJ, Rice DC, Sepesi B. Tumor thickness in mesothelioma predicts differential response to neoadjuvant therapy and survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 166:362-371.e9. [PMID: 36737380 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma remains controversial and demonstrates variable responses. We sought to evaluate tumor thickness as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant therapy and as a prognostic marker for overall survival. METHODS Data from patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by cytoreductive surgery from 2002 to 2019 were reviewed. Baseline and postneoadjuvant therapy tumor thickness were measured on computed tomography. Radiological tumor response was categorized as progressive disease (≥20% increase), partial response (≥30% decrease), or stable disease (in between). Tumor response outcomes were modeled using logistic regression and multinomial regression models. Overall survival was evaluated based on tumor thickness and tumor response. RESULTS Of the 143 patients reviewed, 36 (25%) had progressive disease, 54 (38%) had stable disease, and 56 (39%) had partial response. The baseline tumor thickness of the progressive disease group (36 mm) was lower than in both stable disease and partial response groups (both 63 mm; P < .001). Both logistic regression and multinomial regression analyses demonstrated that thicker baseline tumor thickness was associated with decreased probability of progressive disease and increased probability of partial response. In a multivariable Cox model, thicker postneoadjuvant therapy tumor thickness was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.01, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01, P = .008). The same trend was observed for thicker baseline tumor thickness (hazard ratio, 1.02, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.04, P = .008), and the risk was decreased in tumors with partial response (hazard ratio, 0.98, 95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.100, P = .014). CONCLUSIONS We present the first study demonstrating the relationship between baseline tumor thickness and differential radiographic response to neoadjuvant therapy and survival. Further studies are needed to validate tumor thickness as both a prognostic and predictive biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Zhou
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Cynthia S Bell
- Center for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex
| | - Hope A Feldman
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Cara L Haymaker
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Anne S Tsao
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Reza J Mehran
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - David C Rice
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Boris Sepesi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Strange CD, Marom EM, Ahuja J, Shroff GS, Gladish GW, Carter BW, Truong MT. Imaging of Malignant Pleural, Pericardial, and Peritoneal Mesothelioma. Adv Anat Pathol 2023; 30:280-291. [PMID: 36395181 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Malignant mesothelioma is a rare tumor arising from the mesothelial cells that line the pleura, pericardium, peritoneum, and tunica vaginalis. Imaging plays a primary role in the diagnosis, staging, and management of malignant mesothelioma. Multimodality imaging, including radiography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT), is used in a variety of scenarios, including diagnosis, guidance for tissue sampling, staging, and reassessment of disease after therapy. CT is the primary imaging modality used in staging. MRI has superior contrast resolution compared with CT and can add value in terms of determining surgical resectability in equivocal cases. MRI can further assess the degree of local invasion, particularly into the mediastinum, chest wall, and diaphragm, for malignant pleural and pericardial mesotheliomas. FDG PET/CT plays a role in the diagnosis and staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and has been shown to be more accurate than CT, MRI, and PET alone in the staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma. PET/CT can also be used to target lesions for biopsy and to assess prognosis, treatment response, and tumor recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad D Strange
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Edith M Marom
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Jitesh Ahuja
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Girish S Shroff
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gregory W Gladish
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brett W Carter
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mylene T Truong
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van Gulijk M, Belderbos B, Dumoulin D, Cornelissen R, Bezemer K, Klaase L, Dammeijer F, Aerts J. Combination of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition and dendritic cell therapy in mice models and in patients with mesothelioma. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:1438-1443. [PMID: 36104949 PMCID: PMC10092125 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Immunotherapy with anti-PD1/PD-L1 is effective in only a subgroup of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We investigated the efficacy of a combination of anti-PD1/PD-L1 and dendritic cell (DC) therapy to optimally induce effective anti-tumor immunity in MPM in both humans and mice. Data of nine MPM patients treated with DC therapy and sequential anti-PD1 treatment were collected and analyzed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival and T-cell responses were monitored in AC29 mesothelioma-bearing mice treated concurrently with the combination therapy; additionally, the role of the tumor-draining lymph node (TDLN) was investigated. The combination therapy resulted in a median OS and PFS of 17.7 and 8.0 months, respectively. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events had not been reported. Survival of the mesothelioma-bearing mice treated with the combination therapy was longer than that of untreated mice, and coincided with improved T-cell activation in peripheral blood and less T-cell exhaustion in end stage tumors. Comparable results were obtained when solely the TDLN was targeted. We concluded that this combination therapy is safe and shows promising OS and PFS. The murine data support that PD-L1 treatment may reinvigorate the T-cell responses induced by DC therapy, which may primarily be the result of TDLN targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandy van Gulijk
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bob Belderbos
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne Dumoulin
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robin Cornelissen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Bezemer
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Larissa Klaase
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Floris Dammeijer
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Katz SI, Straus CM, Roshkovan L, Blyth KG, Frauenfelder T, Gill RR, Lalezari F, Erasmus J, Nowak AK, Gerbaudo VH, Francis RJ, Armato SG. Considerations for Imaging of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Consensus Statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:278-298. [PMID: 36549385 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive primary malignancy of the pleura that presents unique radiologic challenges with regard to accurate and reproducible assessment of disease extent at staging and follow-up imaging. By optimizing and harmonizing technical approaches to imaging MPM, the best quality imaging can be achieved for individual patient care, clinical trials, and imaging research. This consensus statement represents agreement on harmonized, standard practices for routine multimodality imaging of MPM, including radiography, computed tomography, 18F-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, by an international panel of experts in the field of pleural imaging assembled by the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. In addition, modality-specific technical considerations and future directions are discussed. A bulleted summary of all technical recommendations is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharyn I Katz
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Christopher M Straus
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Leonid Roshkovan
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kevin G Blyth
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Frauenfelder
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ritu R Gill
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ferry Lalezari
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeremy Erasmus
- Department of Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Victor H Gerbaudo
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Roslyn J Francis
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Samuel G Armato
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ollila-Raj H, Murumägi A, Pellinen T, Arjama M, Sutinen E, Volmonen K, Haikala HM, Kallioniemi O, Mäyränpää MI, Ilonen I. Novel therapeutic approaches for pleural mesothelioma identified by functional ex vivo drug sensitivity testing. Lung Cancer 2023; 178:213-219. [PMID: 36878102 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options. The first-line therapy has remained unchanged for two decades and consists of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) have high response rates, resulting in recent updates in treatment recommendations by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, the overall benefits of combination treatment are modest, suggesting that other targeted therapy options should be investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS We employed high-throughput drug sensitivity and resistance testing on five established PM cell lines using 527 cancer drugs in a 2D setting. Drugs of the greatest potential (n = 19) were selected for further testing in primary cell models derived from pleural effusions of seven PM patients. RESULTS All established and primary patient-derived PM cell models were sensitive to the mTOR inhibitor AZD8055. Furthermore, another mTOR inhibitor (temsirolimus) showed efficacy in most of the primary patient-derived cells, although a less robust effect was observed when compared with the established cell lines. Most of the established cell lines and all patient-derived primary cells exhibited sensitivity to the PI3K/mTOR/DNA-PK inhibitor LY3023414. The Chk1 inhibitor prexasertib showed activity in 4/5 (80%) of the established cell lines and in 2/7 (29%) of the patient-derived primary cell lines. The BET family inhibitor JQ1 showed activity in four patient-derived cell models and in one established cell line. CONCLUSION mTOR and Chk1 pathways had promising results with established mesothelioma cell lines in an ex vivo setting. In patient-derived primary cells, drugs targeting mTOR pathway in particular showed efficacy. These findings may inform novel treatment strategies for PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hely Ollila-Raj
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Heart and Lung Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Finland; iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, Finland.
| | - Astrid Murumägi
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Teijo Pellinen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mariliina Arjama
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eva Sutinen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Heart and Lung Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, Finland
| | - Kirsi Volmonen
- Radiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heidi M Haikala
- Translational Immunology Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland; iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, Finland
| | - Olli Kallioniemi
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Finland; Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab), Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | - Mikko I Mäyränpää
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ilkka Ilonen
- iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, Finland; Department of General Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Heart and Lung Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Piccirillo MC, Chu Q, Bradbury P, Tu W, Coschi CH, Grosso F, Florescu M, Mencoboni M, Goffin JR, Pagano M, Ciardiello F, Cecere FL, Vincent M, Ferrara R, Dawe DE, Hao D, Lee CW, Morabito A, Gridelli C, Cavanna L, Iqbal M, Blais N, Leighl NB, Wheatley-Price P, Tsao MS, Ugo F, El-Osta H, Gargiulo P, Gaudreau PO, Tu D, Sederias J, Brown-Walker P, Perrone F, Seymour L, Laurie SA. Brief Report: Canadian Cancer Trials Group IND.227: A Phase 2 Randomized Study of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (NCT02784171). J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:813-819. [PMID: 36841541 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have activity in mesothelioma. IND.227 was a phase 2 trial (120 patients planned) comparing progression-free survival of standard platinum and pemetrexed (CP) versus CP + pembrolizumab (pembro) versus pembro. Accrual to the pembro arm was discontinued on the basis of interim analysis (IA-16 wk disease control rate). CP + pembro was tolerable, with progression-free survival similar between arms and median survival and overall response rate higher than those of CP alone (19.8 mo [95% confidence interval or CI: 8.4-41.36] versus 8.9 mo [95% CI: 5.3-12.8] and 47% [95% CI: 24%-71%] versus 19% [95% CI: 5%-42%], respectively). The subsequent phase 3 trial has completed accrual; results are expected in 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Carmela Piccirillo
- Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Quincy Chu
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Wei Tu
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Federica Grosso
- Mesothelioma Unit (FG) & Department of Integrated Activities Research and Innovation (FU), SS. Antonio e Biagio C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Marie Florescu
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Maria Pagano
- Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, AUSL Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Fortunato Ciardiello
- Oncology and Hematology Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy
| | - Fabiana Letizia Cecere
- Oncology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri (IFO) Istituto Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
| | - Mark Vincent
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Roberto Ferrara
- Thoracic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - David E Dawe
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Desiree Hao
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre and Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Alessandro Morabito
- Thoracic Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Cesare Gridelli
- Oncology Unit, S. Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy
| | - Luigi Cavanna
- Oncology and Hematology Department, USL Piacenza, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
| | | | - Normand Blais
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Paul Wheatley-Price
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Francesca Ugo
- Mesothelioma Unit (FG) & Department of Integrated Activities Research and Innovation (FU), SS. Antonio e Biagio C. Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy
| | | | - Piera Gargiulo
- Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Dongsheng Tu
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Francesco Perrone
- Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Lesley Seymour
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Scott A Laurie
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Söyler Y, Özmen Ö, Kabalak PA, Ertürk H, Uğurman F, Yılmaz Ü. The efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in monitoring disease progression in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2023; 42:3-9. [PMID: 36152987 DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2022.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the event of suspicion of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) progression, imaging plays an important role. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in monitoring disease progression by comparing it with CT, and estimate median overall survival (OS) according to progression status with CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was an observational, retrospective, single-institution study with MPM patients who had both 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT for monitoring disease progression from March 2009 to February 2020. Clinical features, radiological findings, and progression status according to CT [radiologic progression negative (RPN), radiologic progression positive (RPP)] and 18F-FDG PET/CT [metabolic progression negative (MPN), metabolic progression positive (MPP)] were recorded. The discrepancies and concordance between two methods were evaluated. The OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS A total of 56 patients were included. There were thirty-one (55.3%) RPN and 25 (44.7%) RPP, while there were 26 (46.5%) MPN and 30 (53.5%) MPP. All RPP patients were also found to be MPP, however, among RPN, 5 patients (8.9% of all patients) were evaluated as MPP. The concordance between two methods in monitoring disease progression was very good (K = 0.423; p < 0.01). The OS was 26 ± 2.6 months in all patients. Kaplan-Meier curves between RPN and RPP, and between MPN and MPP did not show statistically significant differences (p = 0.56 and p = 0.25, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Both methods are equally acceptable in monitoring disease progression in MPM, even though 18F-FDG PET/CT detected more progression than CT did.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasemin Söyler
- Department of Chest Diseases, Ankara Kecioren Sanatorium Ataturk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Özlem Özmen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara Kecioren Sanatorium Ataturk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Pınar Akın Kabalak
- Department of Chest Diseases, Ankara Kecioren Sanatorium Ataturk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Hakan Ertürk
- Department of Radiology, Ankara Kecioren Sanatorium Ataturk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Feza Uğurman
- Department of Chest Diseases, Ankara Kecioren Sanatorium Ataturk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Ülkü Yılmaz
- Department of Chest Diseases, Ankara Kecioren Sanatorium Ataturk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bogar F, Ak G, Metintas S, Ayhanci A, Metintas M. Longitudinal monitoring of response to chemotherapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma by biomarkers. Cancer Biomark 2023; 38:111-120. [PMID: 37545218 DOI: 10.3233/cbm-220436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to longitudinally investigate the serum levels of mesothelin, sestrin1, hyaluronan synthase 2 (HAS2), midkine, and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) before and after chemotherapy and at the time of relapse in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients treated with chemotherapy and to compare the changes in biomarker levels with radiological treatment outcome. METHODS A total of 64 MPM patients treated with chemotherapy were enrolled in the study and longitudinally followed for changes in biomarker levels in response to treatment. Biomarkers levels were measured in serum using a human ELISA kit. Relative and absolute changes in biomarker levels were compared with the best radiological overall response at each time point. RESULTS Median survival was 20.0 ± 2.4 (15.3-24.7) months in patients with partial and complete response, 17.0 ± 1.0 (15.0-19.0) months in patients with stable disease, and 9.0 ± 1.0 (7.0-11.0) months in patients with progressive disease. A significant decrease in serum levels of mesothelin, midkine, and HMGB1 was observed in patients with radiologically partial and complete responses to chemotherapy (p< 0.001, p= 0.016, and p= 0.039, respectively). In these patients, mesothelin levels decreased by 15%, midkine levels by 7%, and HMGB1 levels by 15%. In addition, HMGB1 serum levels were found to significantly increase by 15% in patients with radiologically progressive responses to chemotherapy compared to pretreatment serum levels (p= 0.035). In patients with partial and complete response to chemotherapy, mesothelin levels increased by 15%, midkine by 12%, and sestrin1 by 8% when the disease recurred (p= 0.004, p= 0.004 and p= 0.044, respectively). CONCLUSION Biomarkers may be useful in the longitudinal monitoring of response to treatment in MPM. However, the results of our study should be validated in larger groups with sufficient case numbers from multicenter institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filiz Bogar
- Eskisehir Osmangazi University Lung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Guntulu Ak
- Eskisehir Osmangazi University Lung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskisehir, Turkey
- Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Medical Faculty, Department of Chest Disease, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Selma Metintas
- Eskisehir Osmangazi University Lung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskisehir, Turkey
- Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Medical Faculty, Department of Public Health, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Adnan Ayhanci
- Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Muzaffer Metintas
- Eskisehir Osmangazi University Lung and Pleural Cancers Research and Clinical Center, Eskisehir, Turkey
- Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Medical Faculty, Department of Chest Disease, Eskisehir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wang Y, Qiang WM, Li JQ, Shen AM, Chen XC, Li XF, Zhang BZ, Xie J, Yan R, Li XH, Zhang ZL, Wang CL, Li LY. The effect of chronoradiotherapy on cervical cancer patients: A multicenter randomized controlled study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1021453. [PMID: 36457490 PMCID: PMC9706194 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1021453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the short-term efficacy and radiotoxicity 3.543of chronoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer. We also examined the overall symptom score and quality of life (QOL) of patients who underwent morning radiotherapy and evening radiotherapy. METHODS We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of morning radiotherapy (9:00-11:00 AM) with evening radiotherapy (7:00-9:00 PM) in cervical cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. From November 2021 to June 2022, 114 cervical cancer patients admitted to eight cancer center hospitals in Tianjin, Chongqing, Hubei, Shanxi, Shandong, Shaanxi, Hebei, and Cangzhou were randomly divided into the morning radiotherapy group (MG; N = 61) and the evening radiotherapy group (EG; N = 53). The short-term efficacy of radiotherapy on cervical cancer patients at different time points and the occurrence of radiotoxicity were explored after patients had undergone radiotherapy. RESULTS The total effective response (partial remission [PR] + complete remission [CR]) rate was similar across the two groups (93.5% vs. 96.3%, p > 0.05). However, the incidence of bone marrow suppression and intestinal reaction in the two groups were significantly different (p < 0.05). The patients in the MG had significantly higher Anderson symptom scores than patients in the EG (21.64 ± 7.916 vs. 18.53 ± 4.098, p < 0.05). In terms of physical activity, functional status, and overall QOL, the MG had significantly lower scores than the EG (p < 0.05). No other measures showed a significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSION The radiotherapy effect of the MG was consistent with that of the EG. The incidence of radiation enteritis and radiation diarrhea in the MG was significantly higher than that in the EG; however, bone marrow suppression and blood toxicity in the EG were more serious than in the MG. Because of the small sample size of the study, we only examined the short-term efficacy of radiotherapy. Therefore, further clinical trials are needed to verify the efficacy and side effects of chronoradiotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION http://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.aspx, Registration Number: ChiCTR2100047140.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Wang
- Nursing Department, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Wan-Min Qiang
- Nursing Department, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Jia-Qian Li
- Nursing Department, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Ao-Mei Shen
- Nursing Department, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiao-Cen Chen
- Nursing Department, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiao-Fang Li
- Nursing Department, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Bao-Zhong Zhang
- Nursing Department, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Juan Xie
- Radiotherapy Department, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xian, China
| | - Rong Yan
- Nursing Department, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Qingdao, China
| | - Xiang-Hua Li
- Nursing Department, Cangzhou People's Hospital, Cangzhou, China
| | - Zhao-Li Zhang
- Nursing Department, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Cui-Ling Wang
- Nursing Department, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Lai-You Li
- Nursing Department, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Söyler Y, Özmen Ö, Kabalak P, Ertürk H, Uğurman F, Yılmaz Ü. La eficacia de [18F]FDG PET/TC en el seguimiento de la progresión de la enfermedad en el mesotelioma pleural maligno. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
26
|
Wang F, Wang FH, Sun K, Jiang C, Peng S, Xu LX, Kuang M, Guo GF, Chen SL. PD-1-mAb Plus Regimen in the First and Second Lines of Advanced and Unresectable Biliary Tract Carcinoma: A Real-World, Multicenter Retrospective Analysis. J Inflamm Res 2022; 15:6031-6046. [PMID: 36339826 PMCID: PMC9635481 DOI: 10.2147/jir.s364303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) has a poor prognosis and few treatment options. We compared the efficacy of the PD-1 monoclonal antibody (PD-1-mAb) combined regimens with the standard chemotherapy in the first-line and second-line treatment of advanced BTC. Methods We retrospectively assessed the patients with advanced BTC, who received treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University and the Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center. The patients were treated with PD-1-mAb combined regimens or standard chemotherapy at the first line or treated with PD-1-mAb combined regimens or systematic therapy at the second line. Further subgroup analyses were assessed to identify superior regimens. Results This study included 210 patients. The first-line PD-1-mAb combination group (n = 83) achieved longer median PFS (mPFS) (7.3 vs 5.3 months, p=0.001) and median OS (mOS) (15.6 vs 11.4 months, p=0.002) than the first-line standard chemotherapy group (n=76). Similarly, the second-line PD-1-mAb combination group (n=50) yielded longer mPFS (6.1 vs 2.6 months, p<0.001) and mOS (11.7 vs 7.2 months, p=0.008) than the second-line systematic therapy group (n=51). Subgroup analyses showed that the PD-1-mAb combined with TKI group achieved better mPFS than the chemotherapy group whether in the first-line (HR = 0.468, p=0.005) or the second-line setting (HR = 0.45, p=0.009), but did not achieve superiority in mOS (both p>0.05). Compared with the chemotherapy group, the PD-1-mAb combined with chemotherapy group achieved longer mOS (HR = 0.53, p=0.023) in the first-line setting and longer mPFS in the second-line setting (HR = 0.54, p=0.044). Conclusion The PD-1-mAb combination therapy is superior to the standard chemotherapy in advanced or unresectable BTC, whether as a first-line or second-line treatment. Among the combination therapy, both the PD-1-mAb combined with TKI and combined with standard chemotherapy were promising options for advanced BTC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Wang
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Feng-Hua Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, The Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Department of Oncology, The Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Kaiyu Sun
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chang Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, The Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, The Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Sui Peng
- Institute of Precision Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li-Xia Xu
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ming Kuang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Gui-Fang Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, The Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, The Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,VIP Department, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Shu-Ling Chen
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Correspondence: Shu-Ling Chen; Gui-Fang Guo, Email ;
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radiofrequency Ablation May Be a New Treatment Modality for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Propensity Score Matching Comparative Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14215320. [PMID: 36358739 PMCID: PMC9654097 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Most colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are not candidates for liver resection. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) plays a key role in selected CRLM patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by liver resection has been widely used for resectable CRLM. Whether NAC followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can achieve a similar prognosis to NAC followed by hepatectomy remains is unclear. The present study aimed to provide a new treatment modality for CRLM patients. Methods: This comparative retrospective research selected CRLM patients from 2009 to 2022. They were divided into NAC + RFA group and NAC + hepatectomy group. The propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias. We used multivariate cox proportional hazards regression analysis to explore independent factors affecting prognosis. The primary study endpoint was the difference in the progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. Results: A total of 190 locally curable CRLM patients were in line with the inclusion criteria. A slight bias was detected in the comparison of basic clinical characteristics between the two groups. RFA showed a significant advantage in the length of hospital stay (median; 2 days vs. 7 days; p < 0.001). The 1- and 3-year PFS in the liver resection and the RFA groups was 57.4% vs. 86.9% (p < 0.001) and 38.8% vs. 55.3% (p = 0.035), respectively. The 1-year and 3-year OS in the liver resection and RFA groups was 100% vs. 96.7% (p = 0.191) and 73.8% vs. 73.6% (p = 0.660), respectively. Conclusions: NAC followed by RFA has rapid postoperative recovery, fewer complications, and better prognosis.
Collapse
|
28
|
Incidence and Risk Factors of Chest Wall Metastasis at Biopsy Sites in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184356. [PMID: 36139517 PMCID: PMC9497080 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate the incidence and risk factors of chest wall metastasis (CWM) at biopsy sites in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 262 consecutive MPM patients who underwent multimodal treatment in which including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and curative-intent surgery, from August 2009 to March 2021. CWM was evaluated radiologically (r-CWM) and pathologically (p-CWM). We also investigated the risk factors of p-CWM and the consistency between r-CWM and p-CWM. Of 262 patients, 25 patients were excluded from analysis due to missing data or impossibility of evaluation. Of the eligible 237 patients, pleural biopsy was performed via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in 197 (83.1%) and medical thoracoscopy in 40 (16.9%). Pleurodesis was performed after pleural biopsy in 74 patients (31.2%). All patients received NAC followed by curative-intent surgery. Radiological examination showed r-CWM in 43 patients (18.1%), while pathological examination showed p-CWM in 135 patients (57.0%). The incidence of p-CWM was significantly higher in the patients who received pleurodesis after pleural biopsy (77.0% vs. 47.9%, <0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for p-CWM revealed that pleurodesis is an independent risk factor of p-CWM (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.84−6.52, <0.001). CWM at the biopsy site was pathologically proven in more than half of the patients (57.0%) who received NAC followed by curative-intent surgery, which was higher than the numbers diagnosed by radiological examinations (p-CWM: 57.0% vs. r-CWM: 18.1%). Pleurodesis after pleural biopsy is an independent risk factor of p-CWM.
Collapse
|
29
|
Disselhorst MJ, Lubeck Y, van der Noort V, Quispel-Janssen J, Seignette IM, Sanders J, Peters D, Hooijberg E, Baas P. Immune cells in mesothelioma microenvironment simplistic marker of response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab? Lung Cancer 2022; 173:49-52. [PMID: 36122471 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a malignant disease of the pleura which recently can be treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). To optimize this treatment, a better understanding of the tumor micro environment is needed. We investigated subgroups of immune cells in subsequent tumor biopsies of patients treated with ICI. METHODS Biopsies from MPM patients included in two clinical ICI trials (nivolumab alone and an ipilimumab/nivolumab combination) were examined. At baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment, pleural biopsies were taken to examine the tumor microenvironment (CD20+, CD4+, CD8+, FoxP3+ and PD-1+ ). Cell density was defined as the number of marker positive cells per mm2. Radiological responses were evaluated as partial response, stable disease or progressive disease according to modified RECIST criteria. RESULTS Thirty-four and 36 patients were included in the nivolumab and ipiliumumab/nivolumab trial respectively. In the nivolumab trial, no significant differences in cell densities were seen in baseline biopsies of patients with partial response versus progressive disease. In contrast, in the ipilimumab/nivolumab trial, a higher cell density of CD4+, CD8+, FoxP3+ and PD-1+ cells at baseline was significantly correlated with partial responses. On-treatment biopsies of both trials did not show significant changes when compared to baseline biopsies. CONCLUSION Biopsies from patients responding to nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment show a significant higher cell density of CD4+, CD8+, FoxP3+ and PD-1+ cells, without a change after 6 weeks of treatment. This observation is a first step in exploring the tumor microenvironment as predictor of response in ICI treatment in MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria J Disselhorst
- Department of Thoracic Oncology. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Yoni Lubeck
- Department of Pathology. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent van der Noort
- Biometrics Department. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Josine Quispel-Janssen
- Department of Thoracic Oncology. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris M Seignette
- Department of Pathology. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Department of Pathology. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dennis Peters
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Erik Hooijberg
- Department of Pathology. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Baas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AvL), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Prognostic Nutritional Index and Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio Can Serve as Independent Predictors of the Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Receiving Targeted Therapy. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:1389049. [PMID: 35990994 PMCID: PMC9388296 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1389049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is an immunonutritional indicator, and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) reflects the inflammatory status. This research intends to determine the implications of NLR and PNI in evaluating the outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing targeted therapy (TT). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 83 patients' records with sorafenib treatment for advanced HCC in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. Patient records comprised general data and blood routines. The PNI and NLR values were calculated using the serum albumin levels (ALB), neutrophil (NEU) count, and lymphocyte (LY) count. The optimal thresholds of the PNI and NLR for predicting HCC patients' outcomes were calculated by X-tile. Patients were further assigned to low- and high-groups of PNI and NLR according to their thresholds. By using the Cox proportional hazards regression models, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors influencing the patient's prognosis. Results The participants were assigned to the corresponding low-PNI (≤42.9; n = 10) and high-PNI (>42.9; n = 73) groups, as well as low-NLR (≤2.4; n = 64) and high-NLR (>2.4; n = 19) groups based on the critical values of PNI (42.9) and NLR (2.4) obtained through the X-tile calculation. A higher overall survival (OS) rate was observed in the high-PNI group and low-NLR group, than in the low-PNI group and high-NLR group, respectively. The disease control rate showed no evident difference between the groups. The PNI and NLR were of high reliability in predicting the OS of patients. Cox multivariate analysis identified the independence of the PNI and NLR as prognostic factors for patients receiving TT for advanced HCC. Conclusions The pretreatment PNI and NLR levels have great prognostic implications for advanced HCC patients receiving TT. A higher PNI and a lower NLR suggest a higher postoperative survival rate.
Collapse
|
31
|
The Evaluation Value of CT in the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Patients. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2022; 2022:7195888. [PMID: 35800240 PMCID: PMC9200539 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7195888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Aim To discuss the evaluation value of CT in the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer. Methods The clinical, pathological, and CT imaging information of 72 patients with ovarian cancer treated in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. CT examination and pathological examination were compared to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results Using the CRS grading system, 26 cases (36.11%) scored 1, 42 cases (58.33%) scored 2, and 4 cases (5.56%) scored 3. CRS grading system scores of 1, 2, 3, and 4–7 patients were compared, P > 0.05. The CT manifestations of lymphadenectasis, degree of peritoneal thickening, ascites, and maximum length diameter of the mass were compared between the patients before and after chemotherapy, P < 0.05. According to RECIST 1.1, there were 1 (1.39%) CR, 38 (52.78%) PR, 29 (40.28%) SD, and 4 (5.56%) PD. The comparison was done between RECIST 1.1 and CRS grading system, P > 0.05. Conclusion CT could be used to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
32
|
Govindan R, Aggarwal C, Antonia SJ, Davies M, Dubinett SM, Ferris A, Forde PM, Garon EB, Goldberg SB, Hassan R, Hellmann MD, Hirsch FR, Johnson ML, Malik S, Morgensztern D, Neal JW, Patel JD, Rimm DL, Sagorsky S, Schwartz LH, Sepesi B, Herbst RS. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of lung cancer and mesothelioma. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2021-003956. [PMID: 35640927 PMCID: PMC9157337 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy has transformed lung cancer care in recent years. In addition to providing durable responses and prolonged survival outcomes for a subset of patients with heavily pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)— either as monotherapy or in combination with other ICIs or chemotherapy—have demonstrated benefits in first-line therapy for advanced disease, the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, as well as in additional thoracic malignancies such as small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and mesothelioma. Challenging questions remain, however, on topics including therapy selection, appropriate biomarker-based identification of patients who may derive benefit, the use of immunotherapy in special populations such as people with autoimmune disorders, and toxicity management. Patient and caregiver education and support for quality of life (QOL) is also important to attain maximal benefit with immunotherapy. To provide guidance to the oncology community on these and other important concerns, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG). This CPG represents an update to SITC’s 2018 publication on immunotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC, and is expanded to include recommendations on SCLC and mesothelioma. The Expert Panel drew on the published literature as well as their clinical experience to develop recommendations for healthcare professionals on these important aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment for lung cancer and mesothelioma, including diagnostic testing, treatment planning, immune-related adverse events, and patient QOL considerations. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations in this CPG are intended to give guidance to cancer care providers using immunotherapy to treat patients with lung cancer or mesothelioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramaswamy Govindan
- Department of Medicine, Oncology Division, Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Scott J Antonia
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Marianne Davies
- Yale School of Nursing, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Steven M Dubinett
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Patrick M Forde
- Upper Aerodigestive Division, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Edward B Garon
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sarah B Goldberg
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Raffit Hassan
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Fred R Hirsch
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Melissa L Johnson
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Tennessee Oncology/One Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Shakun Malik
- Division of Cancer Treatment & Diagnosis, CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Daniel Morgensztern
- Department of Medicine, Oncology Division, Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Joel W Neal
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jyoti D Patel
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - David L Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sarah Sagorsky
- Upper Aerodigestive Division, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Lawrence H Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Boris Sepesi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roy S Herbst
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Fennell DA, Porter C, Lester J, Danson S, Taylor P, Sheaff M, Rudd RM, Gaba A, Busacca S, Nixon L, Gardner G, Darlison L, Poile C, Richards C, Jordan PW, Griffiths G, Casbard A. Active symptom control with or without oral vinorelbine in patients with relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma (VIM): A randomised, phase 2 trial. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 48:101432. [PMID: 35706488 PMCID: PMC9124711 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Currently, there is no US Food and Drug Administration approved therapy for patients with pleural mesothelioma who have relapsed following platinum-doublet based chemotherapy. Vinorelbine has demonstrated useful clinical activity in mesothelioma, however its efficacy has not been formally evaluated in a randomised setting. BRCA1 expression is required for vinorelbine induced apoptosis in preclinical models. Loss of expression may therefore correlate with vinorelbine resistance. Methods In this randomised, phase 2 trial, patients were eligible if they met the following criteria: age ≥ 18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1, histologically confirmed pleural mesothelioma, post platinum-based chemotherapy, and radiological evidence of disease progression. Consented patients were randomised 2:1 to either active symptom control with oral vinorelbine versus active symptom control (ASC) every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal at an initial dose of 60 mg/m2 increasing to 80 mg/m2 post-cycle 1. Randomisation was stratified by histological subtype, white cell count, gender, ECOG performance status and best response during first-line therapy. The study was open label. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), measured from randomisation to time of event (or censoring). Analyses were carried out according to intention-to-treat (ITT) principles. Recruitment and trial follow-up are complete. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02139904. Findings Between June 1, 2016 and Oct 31, 2018, we performed a randomised phase 2 trial in 14 hospitals in the United Kingdom. 225 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 154 were randomly assigned to receive either ASC + vinorelbine (n = 98) or ASC (n = 56). PFS was significantly longer for ASC+vinorelbine compared with ASC alone; 4.2 months (interquartile range (IQR) 2.2-8.0) versus 2.8 months (IQR 1.4-4.1) for ASC, giving an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0·60 (80% CI upper limit 0.7, one-sided unadjusted log rank test p = 0.002); adjusted HR 0.6 (80% CI upper limit 0.7, one-sided adjusted log rank test p < 0.001). BRCA1 did not predict resistance to ASC+vinorelbine. Neutropenia was the most common grades 3, 4 adverse events in the ASC +vinorelbine arm. Interpretation Vinorelbine plus ASC confers clinical benefit to patients with relapsed pleural mesothelioma who have progressed following platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. Funding This study was funded by Cancer Research UK (grant CRUK A15569).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dean A. Fennell
- Mesothelioma Research Programme, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | - Sarah Danson
- Sheffield ECMC, University of Sheffield and Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Paul Taylor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Aarti Gaba
- Mesothelioma Research Programme, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Sara Busacca
- Mesothelioma Research Programme, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Lisette Nixon
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
| | | | - Liz Darlison
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Charlotte Poile
- Mesothelioma Research Programme, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Cathy Richards
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Peter-Wells Jordan
- Mesothelioma Research Programme, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK
| | - Gareth Griffiths
- CRUK Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of, Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Angela Casbard
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sandach P, Seifert R, Fendler WP, Hautzel H, Herrmann K, Maier S, Plönes T, Metzenmacher M, Ferdinandus J. A Role for PET/CT in response assessment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Semin Nucl Med 2022; 52:816-823. [PMID: 35624033 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare type of cancer, whose incidence, however, is increasing and will presumably continue to rise in the coming years. Key features of this disease comprise its mantle-shaped, pleura-associated, often multifocal growth, which cause diagnostic challenges. A growing number of mesotheliomas are being treated with novel immunotherapies for which no image derived general response criteria have been established. However, recent studies indicate that FDG-PET/CT could be superior for response assessment compared to CT-based criteria. This article aims at providing an overview of response assessment criteria dedicated to malignant pleural mesothelioma, such as mRECIST, iRECIST, and PERCIST. In addition, the potential future role of PET/CT in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Sandach
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Robert Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hubertus Hautzel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sandra Maier
- Department of Diagnostical and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Till Plönes
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Metzenmacher
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Justin Ferdinandus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Carlson B, Harmath C, Turaga K, Kindler HL, Armato SG, Straus C. The role of imaging in diagnosis and management of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a systematic review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:1725-1740. [PMID: 35257201 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03464-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Imaging of the peritoneum and related pathology is a challenge. Among peritoneal diseases, malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) is an uncommon tumor with poor prognosis. To date, there are no specific guidelines or imaging protocols dedicated for the peritoneum and MPeM. The objective of this study was to analyze the literature describing imaging modalities used for MPeM to determine their relative clinical efficacy and review commonly reported imaging features of MPeM to promote standardized reporting. METHODS We performed a systematic review of original research articles discussing imaging modalities in MPeM from 1999 to 2020. Effectiveness measures and common findings were compared across imaging modalities. RESULTS Among 582 studies analyzed, the most-used imaging modality was CT (54.3%). In the differentiation of MPeM from peritoneal carcinomatosis, one study found CT had a diagnostic sensitivity of 53%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 68%. Two studies found fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) had sensitivity of 86-92%, specificity of 83-89%, and accuracy of 87-89%. Another study found magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was the best predictor of the peritoneal carcinomatosis index. Characteristics shown to best differentiate MPeM from other diseases included ascites, peritoneal thickening, mesenteric thickening, pleural plaques, maximum tumor dimension, and number of masses. CONCLUSION Most published MPeM imaging studies utilized CT. PET/CT or MRI appear promising, and future studies should compare effectiveness of these modalities. MPeM imaging reports should highlight ascites, number of and maximum tumor dimension, peritoneal/mesenteric thickening, and associated pleural plaques, allowing for better aggregation of MPeM imaging data across studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley Carlson
- Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
- , Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Carla Harmath
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kiran Turaga
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hedy L Kindler
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Samuel G Armato
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Porcel JM. Mesotelioma pleural. Med Clin (Barc) 2022; 159:240-247. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2022.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
37
|
Peterfy C, Chen Y, Countryman P, Chmielowski B, Anthony SP, Healey JH, Wainberg ZA, Cohn AL, Shapiro GI, Keedy VL, Singh A, Puzanov I, Wagner AJ, Qian M, Sterba M, Hsu HH, Tong-Starksen S, Tap WD. CSF1 receptor inhibition of tenosynovial giant cell tumor using novel disease-specific MRI measures of tumor burden. Future Oncol 2022; 18:1449-1459. [PMID: 35040698 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Monitoring treatment of tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is complicated by the irregular shape and asymmetrical growth of the tumor. We compared responses to pexidartinib by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 with those by tumor volume score (TVS) and modified RECIST (m-RECIST). Materials & methods: MRIs acquired every two cycles were assessed centrally using RECIST 1.1, m-RECIST and TVS and tissue damage score (TDS). Results: Thirty-one evaluable TGCT patients were treated with pexidartinib. From baseline to last visit, 94% of patients (29/31) showed a decrease in tumor size (median change: -60% [RECIST], -66% [m-RECIST], -79% [TVS]). All methods showed 100% disease control rate. For TDS, improvements were seen in bone erosion (32%), bone marrow edema (58%) and knee effusion (46%). Conclusion: TVS and m-RECIST offer potentially superior alternatives to conventional RECIST for monitoring disease progression and treatment response in TGCT. TDS adds important information about joint damage associated with TGCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yan Chen
- Spire Sciences, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | | | - Bartosz Chmielowski
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | | | - John H Healey
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center & Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Allen L Cohn
- Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO 80216, USA
| | - Geoffrey I Shapiro
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Vicki L Keedy
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Arun Singh
- UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
| | - Andrew J Wagner
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Meng Qian
- Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ 07920, USA
| | - Mike Sterba
- Plexxikon Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | - Henry H Hsu
- Plexxikon Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | | | - William D Tap
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center & Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Popat S, Baas P, Faivre-Finn C, Girard N, Nicholson AG, Nowak AK, Opitz I, Scherpereel A, Reck M. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up ☆. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:129-142. [PMID: 34861373 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S Popat
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Section of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; National Centre for Mesothelioma Research, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Baas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C Faivre-Finn
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - N Girard
- Thorax Institute Curie Montsouris, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A G Nicholson
- National Centre for Mesothelioma Research, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Histopathology, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, London, UK
| | - A K Nowak
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, Centre for Respiratory Health, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia; Medical School, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| | - I Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - A Scherpereel
- Department of Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, University of Lille, CHU Lille, INSERM U1189, OncoThAI, Lille, France
| | - M Reck
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, LungenClinic Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Armato SG, Nowak AK, Francis RJ, Katz SI, Kholmatov M, Blyth KG, Gudmundsson E, Kidd AC, Gill RR. Imaging in pleural mesothelioma: A review of the 15th International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer 2021; 164:76-83. [PMID: 35042132 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Imaging of mesothelioma plays a role in all aspects of patient management, including disease detection, staging, evaluation of treatment options, response assessment, pre-surgical evaluation, and surveillance. Imaging in this disease impacts a wide range of disciplines throughout the healthcare enterprise. Researchers and clinician-scientists are developing state-of-the-art techniques to extract more of the information contained within these medical images and to utilize it for more sophisticated tasks; moreover, image-acquisition technology is advancing the inherent capabilities of these images. This paper summarizes the imaging-based topics presented orally at the 2021 International Conference of the International Mesothelioma Interest Group (iMig), which was held virtually from May 7-9, 2021. These topics include an update on the mesothelioma staging system, novel molecular targets to guide therapy in mesothelioma, special considerations and potential pitfalls in imaging mesothelioma in the immunotherapy setting, tumor measurement strategies and their correlation with patient survival, tumor volume measurement in MRI and CT, CT-based texture analysis for differentiation of histologic subtype, diffusion-weighted MRI for the assessment of biphasic mesothelioma, and the prognostic significance of skeletal muscle loss with chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel G Armato
- Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Medical School and National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Institute for Respiratory Health, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Roslyn J Francis
- Medical School and National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sharyn I Katz
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Manizha Kholmatov
- Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kevin G Blyth
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK; Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Andrew C Kidd
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK; Glasgow Pleural Disease Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ritu R Gill
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Strange CD, Shroff GS, Ahuja J, Vlahos I, Benveniste MFK, Truong MT. Imaging of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Pearls and Pitfalls. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2021; 42:542-551. [PMID: 34895610 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2021.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare tumor arising from the pleural mesothelial cells. Imaging plays a crucial role in the diagnosis, staging, and management of patients with mesothelioma. Accurate staging to stratify patients into homogeneous groups is required to evaluate the effectiveness of multimodality therapeutic regimens. CT and PET/CT are recommended for the initial staging of MPM. MRI adds value to further assess invasion of the tumor into the diaphragm, chest wall, and mediastinum. This review will discuss pearls and pitfalls in the imaging of mesothelioma with emphasis on the roles of CT, MRI, and PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad D Strange
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Girish S Shroff
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jitesh Ahuja
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ioannis Vlahos
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Mylene T Truong
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Curcean S, Cheng L, Picchia S, Tunariu N, Collins D, Blackledge M, Popat S, O'Brien M, Minchom A, Leach MO, Koh DM. Early Response to Chemotherapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Evaluated Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Initial Observations. JTO Clin Res Rep 2021; 2:100253. [PMID: 34870249 PMCID: PMC8626584 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction We compared the magnetic resonance imaging total tumor volume (TTV) and median apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) before and at 4 weeks after chemotherapy, to evaluate whether these are potential early markers of treatment response. Methods Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 23 patients with MPM before and after 4 weeks of chemotherapy. The TTV was measured by semiautomatic segmentation (GrowCut) and transferred onto ADC maps to record the median ADC. Test-retest repeatability of TTV and ADC was evaluated in eight patients. TTV and median ADC changes were compared between responders and nonresponders, defined using modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors on computed tomography (CT) at 12 weeks after treatment. TTV and median ADC were also correlated with CT size measurement and disease survival. Results The test-retest 95% limits of agreement for TTV were -13.9% to 16.2% and for median ADC -1.2% to 3.3%. A significant increase in median ADC in responders was observed at 4 weeks after treatment (p = 0.02). Correlation was found between CT tumor size change at 12 weeks and median ADC changes at 4 weeks post-treatment (r = -0.560, p = 0.006). An increase in median ADC greater than 5.1% at 4 weeks has 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity for responders (area under the curve = 0.933, p < 0.001). There was also moderate correlation between median tumor ADC at baseline and overall survival (r = 0.45, p = 0.03). Conclusions Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging measurements of TTV and median ADC in MPM have good measurement repeatability. Increase in ADC at 4 weeks post-treatment has the potential to be an early response biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Curcean
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Ion Chiricuta Institute of Oncology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lin Cheng
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simona Picchia
- Department of Radiology, Bordet Institute, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Nina Tunariu
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Collins
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Blackledge
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sanjay Popat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary O'Brien
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Minchom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martin O Leach
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bongiolatti S, Mazzoni F, Salimbene O, Caliman E, Ammatuna C, Comin CE, Antonuzzo L, Voltolini L. Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Pleurectomy Decortication and Hyperthermic Intraoperative Chemotherapy (HITHOC) for Early-Stage Epitheliod Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma-A Prospective Report. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10235542. [PMID: 34884251 PMCID: PMC8658521 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis and the current treatment for early-stage MPM is based on a multimodality therapy regimen involving platinum-based chemotherapy preceding or following surgery. To enhance the cytoreductive role of surgery, some peri- or intra-operative intracavitary treatments have been developed, such as hyperthermic chemotherapy, but long-term results are weak. The aim of this study was to report the post-operative results and mid-term outcomes of our multimodal intention-to-treat pathway, including induction chemotherapy, followed by surgery and Hyperthermic Intraoperative THOracic Chemotherapy (HITHOC) in the treatment of early-stage epithelioid MPM. Since 2017, stage I or II epithelioid MPM patients have been inserted in a surgery-based multimodal approach comprising platinum-based induction chemotherapy, followed by pleurectomy and decortication (P/D) and HITHOC with cisplatin. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). During the study period, n = 65 patients affected by MPM were evaluated by our institutional Multidisciplinary Tumour Board; n = 12 patients with stage I-II who had no progression after induction chemotherapy underwent P/D and HITHOC. Post-operative mortality was 0, and complications developed in n = 7 (58.3%) patients. The median estimated OS was 31 months with a 1-year and 3-year OS of 100% and 55%, respectively. The median PFS was 26 months with 92% of a 1-year PFS, whereas DFS was 19 months with a 1-year DFS rate of 83%. The multimodal treatment of early-stage epithelioid MPM, including induction chemotherapy followed by P/D and HITHOC, was well tolerated and feasible with promising mid-term oncological results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Bongiolatti
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy; (O.S.); (L.V.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-(55)-7946807; Fax: +39-55-7949557
| | - Francesca Mazzoni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy; (F.M.); (E.C.); (L.A.)
| | - Ottavia Salimbene
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy; (O.S.); (L.V.)
| | - Enrico Caliman
- Medical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy; (F.M.); (E.C.); (L.A.)
| | - Carlo Ammatuna
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Section of Surgery, Histopathology and Molecular Pathology, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (C.A.); (C.E.C.)
| | - Camilla E. Comin
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Section of Surgery, Histopathology and Molecular Pathology, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (C.A.); (C.E.C.)
| | - Lorenzo Antonuzzo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy; (F.M.); (E.C.); (L.A.)
| | - Luca Voltolini
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy; (O.S.); (L.V.)
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Miyamoto Y, Kozuki T, Aoe K, Wada S, Harada D, Yoshida M, Sakurai J, Hotta K, Fujimoto N. JME-001 phase II trial of first-line combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, pemetrexed, and nivolumab for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2021-003288. [PMID: 34711664 PMCID: PMC8557301 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background JME-001 is a phase II trial assessing the efficacy and safety of cisplatin, pemetrexed, and nivolumab as first-line therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Patients and methods Patients with untreated, unresectable MPM with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0–1 were included. The primary endpoint is the centrally reviewed objective response rate. The secondary endpoints include (1) response rate assessed by investigators, (2) disease control rate, (3) overall survival, (4) progression-free survival, (5) duration of response, and (6) time to response. Safety and adverse events will also be evaluated. Cisplatin (75 mg/m2), pemetrexed (500 mg/m2), and nivolumab (360 mg/body) were administered intravenously every 3 weeks with a total of 4–6 cycles. If patients did not progress during the combination phase, maintenance therapy with nivolumab was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tissue samples were required and collected for programmed death ligand 1 analysis. Results Eighteen patients (mean age 69.2 years, 15 men) were enrolled between January 2018 and May 2019. The ECOG PS was 0 in 3 patients and 1 in 15 patients. Fourteen (77.8%; 95% CI 52.4% to 93.6%) patients had an objective response. The disease control rate was 94.4% (95% CI 72.7% to 99.9%). Fourteen (77.8%) patients had partial response (PR), three had stable disease, and one was not evaluable. Tumor shrinkage was observed in 10/14 (71.4%) patients with epithelioid, and 2/2 (100%) patients with sarcomatoid or biphasic histological subtype had PR. Ten (55.6%) patients experienced grade 3 or worse adverse events, including disorder of metabolism or nutrition (33.3%), loss of appetite (27.8%), anemia (16.7%), and hyponatremia (11.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions The safety and efficacy of this study strongly support a definitive trial of this combination. Trial registration number UMIN000030892.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosuke Miyamoto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Kozuki
- Department of Thoracic Oncology and Medicine, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Keisuke Aoe
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Yamaguchi-Ube Medical Center, Ube, Japan
| | - Sae Wada
- Department of Medical Oncology, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Daijiro Harada
- Department of Thoracic Oncology and Medicine, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Michihiro Yoshida
- Center of Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Jun Sakurai
- Center of Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Hotta
- Center of Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Nobukazu Fujimoto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Pilot Study to Evaluate Serum Soluble Mesothelin-Related Peptide (SMRP) as Marker for Clinical Monitoring of Pleural Mesothelioma (PM): Correlation with Modified RECIST Score. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11112015. [PMID: 34829362 PMCID: PMC8623660 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
A soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) is the only FDA-approved biomarker for diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma (PM) and the most used for monitoring treatment. Radiological assessment of PM, based on modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria, is challenging. This pilot study was designed to evaluate whether SMRP levels correlated over time with mRECIST score. Serial serum samples from PM patients were collected and SMRP levels were measured and compared with the mRECIST score obtained through centralized CT scans by blinded review. The within-patient SMRP-mRECIST relationship over time was estimated through a normal random-effects regression approach applied to the log-transformed mRECIST score. Overall, 58 PM patients were included (46 males and 12 females) with a median age at diagnosis of 67 years (min–max = 48–79), 44 (76%) with epithelioid and 14 (24%) with non-epithelioid histology. The total number of SMRP measurements and CT scans considered for analysis was 183. There was a statistically significant correlation between SMRP and mRECIST score in the 2 cohorts considered both separately and jointly. These results, although exploratory, suggest that SMRP measurement might be considered as an adjunct to monitor PM patients in order to delay CT scans time interval, thus warranting further investigation.
Collapse
|
45
|
Computed Tomography and Spirometry Can Predict Unresectability in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10194407. [PMID: 34640425 PMCID: PMC8509574 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10194407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Preoperative identification of unresectable pleural mesothelioma could spare unnecessary surgical intervention and accelerate the initiation of medical treatments. The aim of this study is to determine predictors of unresectability, testing our impression that the contraction of the ipsilateral hemithorax is often associated with exploratory thoracotomy. Between 1994 and 2020, 291 patients undergoing intended macroscopic complete resection for mesothelioma after chemotherapy were retrospectively investigated. Eligible patients (n = 58) presented a preoperative 3 mm slice-thickness chest computed tomography without pleural effusion or hydropneumothorax. Lung volumes (segmented using a semi-automated method), modified-Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) measurements, and spirometries were collected after chemotherapy. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the predictors of unresectability. An unresectable disease was found at the time of operation in 25.9% cases. By multivariable analysis, the total lung capacity (p = 0.03) and the disease burden (p = 0.02) were found to be predictors of unresectability; cut-off values were <77.5% and >120.5 mm, respectively. Lung volumes were not confirmed to be associated with unresectability at multivariable analysis, probably due to the correlation with the disease burden (p < 0.001; r = −0.4). Our study suggests that disease burden and total lung capacity could predict MPM unresectability, helping surgeons in recommending surgery or not in a multimodality setting.
Collapse
|
46
|
Nowak AK, Jackson A, Sidhu C. Management of Advanced Pleural Mesothelioma-At the Crossroads. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 18:116-124. [PMID: 34491782 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of pleural mesothelioma has changed with the demonstration that first-line checkpoint blockade therapy improves survival. This review covers issues of relevance to the practicing medical oncologist, with an emphasis on the palliative setting and on new information. Until recently, standard systemic therapy for mesothelioma was combination chemotherapy with platinum and pemetrexed. In 2020, combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab was approved as first-line systemic therapy for mesothelioma following release of the results from the CheckMate 743 trial. This trial showed improved overall survival for patients receiving ipilimumab and nivolumab over those treated with platinum and pemetrexed chemotherapy. When the survival results were examined by histologic subtype, the survival benefit was most significant in those with nonepithelioid mesothelioma, a group for which combination immunotherapy is now standard of care. The most important outstanding issue from CheckMate-743 is a better understanding, through translational studies, of which patients with epithelioid mesothelioma may benefit from combination immunotherapy. The next generation of first-line clinical trials in mesothelioma will report the results of first-line combination chemoimmunotherapy. For those patients who receive first-line dual checkpoint blockade, there is no evidence as to the efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy. However, given the known first-line efficacy of cisplatin or carboplatin and pemetrexed, combination chemotherapy is an appropriate subsequent choice for those who progress on or after dual immunotherapy. For those who previously received chemotherapy without immunotherapy, single-agent nivolumab provides benefit over best supportive care. In summary, both chemotherapy and immunotherapy should be considered for all patients during their disease course. Another topical issue is the growing appreciation that some individuals have an inherited predisposition to mesothelioma; referral to a clinical geneticist should be considered under some circumstances. The role of surgery and multimodality therapy is controversial, with results awaited from the fully recruited MARS-2 clinical trial. Patient selection, staging, and multidisciplinary review are critical to identify those who might benefit from a multimodality approach. Finally, a proactive, multidisciplinary approach to symptom management and the principles of management of pleural effusions are critical to manage the symptom burden of mesothelioma and optimize patient well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna K Nowak
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, Centre for Respiratory Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.,Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
| | - Alannah Jackson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
| | - Calvin Sidhu
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.,Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Adusumilli PS, Zauderer MG, Rivière I, Solomon SB, Rusch VW, O'Cearbhaill RE, Zhu A, Cheema W, Chintala NK, Halton E, Pineda J, Perez-Johnston R, Tan KS, Daly B, Araujo Filho JA, Ngai D, McGee E, Vincent A, Diamonte C, Sauter JL, Modi S, Sikder D, Senechal B, Wang X, Travis WD, Gönen M, Rudin CM, Brentjens RJ, Jones DR, Sadelain M. A phase I trial of regional mesothelin-targeted CAR T-cell therapy in patients with malignant pleural disease, in combination with the anti-PD-1 agent pembrolizumab. Cancer Discov 2021; 11:2748-2763. [PMID: 34266984 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 211] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural diseases, comprising metastatic lung and breast cancers and malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), are aggressive solid tumors with poor therapeutic response. We developed and conducted a first-in-human, phase I study of regionally delivered, autologous, mesothelin-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Intrapleural administration of 0.3M-60M CAR T cells/kg in 27 patients (25 with MPM) was safe and well tolerated. CAR T-cells were detected in peripheral blood for >100 days in 39% of patients. Following our demonstration that PD-1 blockade enhances CAR T-cell function in mice, 18 patients with MPM also received pembrolizumab safely. Among those patients, median overall survival from CAR T-cell infusion was 23.9 months (1-year overall survival, 83%). Stable disease was sustained for {greater than or equal to}6 months in 8 patients; 2 exhibited complete metabolic response on PET scan. Combination immunotherapy with CAR T cells and PD-1 blockade agents should be further evaluated in patients with solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prasad S Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
- Cellular Therapeutics Center, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marjorie G Zauderer
- Cellular Therapeutics Center, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Isabelle Rivière
- Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Michael G. Harris Cell Therapy and Cell Engineering Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Cellular Therapeutics Center, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amy Zhu
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Waseem Cheema
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Navin K Chintala
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Elizabeth Halton
- Cellular Therapeutics Center, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - John Pineda
- Cellular Therapeutics Center, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rocio Perez-Johnston
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kay See Tan
- Cellular Therapeutics Center, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bobby Daly
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jose A Araujo Filho
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel Ngai
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Erin McGee
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alain Vincent
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Claudia Diamonte
- Cellular Therapeutics Center, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jennifer L Sauter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Shanu Modi
- Cellular Therapeutics Center, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Devanjan Sikder
- Michael G. Harris Cell Therapy and Cell Engineering Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Brigitte Senechal
- Michael G. Harris Cell Therapy and Cell Engineering Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Xiuyan Wang
- Michael G. Harris Cell Therapy and Cell Engineering Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - William D Travis
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Charles M Rudin
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Renier J Brentjens
- Cellular Therapeutics Center, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David R Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michel Sadelain
- Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ke H, Kao S, Lee K, Takahashi K, Goh HP, Linton A. The minimum standard of care for managing malignant pleural mesothelioma in developing nations within the Asia-Pacific Region. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 18:177-190. [PMID: 34161674 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an incurable malignancy associated with high symptom burden and poor prognosis. The relationship between asbestos exposure and MPM incidence is well-established. The incidence rate of MPM in Australia and New Zealand is among the highest globally. Matching the experience of other nations with legal restrictions on asbestos, incidence is expected to fall. In contrast, the incidence of MPM is rising in the developing nations of the Asia-Pacific as consumption and mining (albeit to a lesser extent) of asbestos continues. The incidence of MPM in these nations is currently low or unknown, reflecting insufficient latency periods since industrial use of asbestos, deficient resources for accurate diagnosis, and lack of occupational disease or cancer registries. The landscape of treatment for MPM is rapidly changing with combination immunotherapy now demonstrating improved survival in the first-line setting. Considering vast global inequity in access to anticancer treatments, establishing minimum standard of care for MPM in developing nations is of greater significance. Here, we review the evidence that form the basis of our minimum-standard recommendations for diagnosis, systemic treatment, management of recurrent pleural effusions, and symptom management. We also briefly review evidence-based treatment that may be considered for those with access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Ke
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steven Kao
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kenneth Lee
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ken Takahashi
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
| | - Hui Poh Goh
- PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei
| | - Anthony Linton
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Opitz I, Scherpereel A, Berghmans T, Psallidas I, Glatzer M, Rigau D, Astoul P, Bölükbas S, Boyd J, Coolen J, De Bondt C, De Ruysscher D, Durieux V, Faivre-Finn C, Fennell DA, Galateau-Salle F, Greillier L, Hoda MA, Klepetko W, Lacourt A, McElnay P, Maskell NA, Mutti L, Pairon JC, Van Schil P, van Meerbeeck JP, Waller D, Weder W, Putora PM, Cardillo G. ERS/ESTS/EACTS/ESTRO guidelines for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 58:1-24. [PMID: 32448904 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The European Respiratory Society (ERS)/European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) task force brought together experts to update previous 2009 ERS/ESTS guidelines on management of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), a rare cancer with globally poor outcome, after a systematic review of the 2009-2018 literature. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations formulated by this multidisciplinary group of experts. Diagnosis: pleural biopsies remain the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis, usually obtained by thoracoscopy but occasionally via image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in cases of pleural symphysis or poor performance status. Pathology: standard staining procedures are insufficient in ∼10% of cases, justifying the use of specific markers, including BAP-1 and CDKN2A (p16) for the separation of atypical mesothelial proliferation from MPM. Staging: in the absence of a uniform, robust and validated staging system, we advise using the most recent 2016 8th TNM (tumour, node, metastasis) classification, with an algorithm for pretherapeutic assessment. Monitoring: patient's performance status, histological subtype and tumour volume are the main prognostic factors of clinical importance in routine MPM management. Other potential parameters should be recorded at baseline and reported in clinical trials. Treatment: (chemo)therapy has limited efficacy in MPM patients and only selected patients are candidates for radical surgery. New promising targeted therapies, immunotherapies and strategies have been reviewed. Because of limited data on the best combination treatment, we emphasize that patients who are considered candidates for a multimodal approach, including radical surgery, should be treated as part of clinical trials in MPM-dedicated centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Arnaud Scherpereel
- Department of Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, French National Network of Clinical Expert Centers for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Management (Mesoclin), Lille, France.,Department of Pulmonary and Thoracic Oncology, University Lille, CHU Lille, INSERM U1189, OncoThAI, Lille, France
| | | | - Ioannis Psallidas
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Markus Glatzer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - David Rigau
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philippe Astoul
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Pleural Diseases and Interventional Pulmonology, Hôpital Nord, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Servet Bölükbas
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Evang, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Johan Coolen
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlotte De Bondt
- Department of Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), Maastricht University Medical Center+, GROW Research Institute, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Valerie Durieux
- Bibliothèque des Sciences de la Santé, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Dean A Fennell
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester and University of Leicester Hospitals NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Francoise Galateau-Salle
- Department of Biopathology, National Reference Center for Pleural Malignant Mesothelioma and Rare Peritoneal Tumors MESOPATH, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Greillier
- Department of Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations, Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Inserm UMR1068, CNRS UMR7258, Marseille, France
| | - Mir Ali Hoda
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Walter Klepetko
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aude Lacourt
- University Bordeaux, INSERM, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team EPICENE, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Nick A Maskell
- Academic Respiratory Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Luciano Mutti
- Teaching Hospital Vercelli/Gruppo Italiano, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Jean-Claude Pairon
- INSERM U955, GEIC2O, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Service de Pathologies professionnelles et de l'Environnement, Institut Santé -Travail Paris-Est, CHI Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Paul Van Schil
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jan P van Meerbeeck
- Department of Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - David Waller
- Barts Thorax Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Walter Weder
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Paul Martin Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Giuseppe Cardillo
- Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Disselhorst MJ, de Vries R, Quispel-Janssen J, Wolf-Lansdorf M, Sterk PJ, Baas P. Nose in malignant mesothelioma-Prediction of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Eur J Cancer 2021; 152:60-67. [PMID: 34087572 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown that a subgroup of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) could benefit from these agents. However, there are no accurate biomarkers to predict who will respond. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of exhaled breath analysis using electronic technology (eNose) for discriminating between responders to ICI and non-responders. METHODS This proof-of-concept prospective observational study was part of an intervention study (INITIATE) in patients with recurrent MPM who were treated with nivolumab (anti-PD-1) plus ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4). At baseline and after six weeks of treatment, breath profiles were collected by an eNose. Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors were used to assess efficacy at 6-month follow-up. For data processing and statistics, we used independent t-test analyses followed by linear discriminant and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS Exhaled breath data of 31 MPM patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab were available at baseline. There were 16 with and 15 without a response after 6 months of treatment. At baseline, breath profiles significantly differed between responders and non-responders, with a cross validation value of 71%. The ROC-AUC after internal cross-validation was 0.90 (confidence interval: 0.80-1.00). CONCLUSION An eNose is able to discriminate at baseline between responders and non-responders to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in MPM, thereby potentially identifying a subgroup of patients that will benefit from ICI treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rianne de Vries
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Breathomix BV, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Peter J Sterk
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Baas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, NKI-AvL, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|