Genomic Alterations and the Incidence of Brain Metastases in Advanced and Metastatic NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Metastatic brain tumors: from development to cutting-edge treatment

Metastatic brain tumors, also called brain metastasis (BM), represent a challenging complication of advanced tumors. Tumors that commonly metastasize to the brain include lung cancer and breast cancer. In recent years, the prognosis for BM patients has improved, and significant advancements have been made in both clinical and preclinical research. This review focuses on BM originating from lung cancer and breast cancer. We briefly overview the history and epidemiology of BM, as well as the current diagnostic and treatment paradigms. Additionally, we summarize multiomics evidence on the mechanisms of tumor occurrence and development in the era of artificial intelligence and discuss the role of the tumor microenvironment. Preclinically, we introduce the establishment of BM models, detailed molecular mechanisms, and cutting-edge treatment methods. BM is primarily treated with a comprehensive approach, including local treatments such as surgery and radiotherapy. For lung cancer, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have shown efficacy, while in breast cancer, monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates are effective in BM. Multiomics approaches assist in clinical diagnosis and treatment, revealing the complex mechanisms of BM. Moreover, preclinical agents often need to cross the blood-brain barrier to achieve high intracranial concentrations, including small-molecule inhibitors, nanoparticles, and peptide drugs. Addressing BM is imperative.

Optimal intervention timing for craniocerebral radiotherapy in EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Intracranial radiation in combination with EGFR targeted therapy demonstrated signals of superiority to EGFR targeted therapy alone based on several observational studies. The timing based on specific criteria is not clear, and we evaluated the efficacy of intervention timing of craniocerebral radiotherapy (RT) combined with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) on prognosis of patients with EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma complicated with brain metastasis.

METHODS

In total, 603 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations were enrolled in this retrospective study between March 2008-September 2023. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust for demographic and clinical covariates and to compare survival differences between the EGFR-TKI plus craniocerebral RT group and the EGFR-TKI only group. Patients were divided into upfront group and delayed group according to timing of craniocerebral RT interventions and analyses. Graded prognostic assessment for lung cancer using molecular markers (Lung molGPA), overall survival (OS), and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) were calculated. Kaplan-Meier was used to compare iPFS and OS in different groups.

RESULTS

In our study, the median overall survival (OS) was 48.8 months, and the median intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) was 14.2 months before PSM. After PSM, the median OS of EGFR-TKIs + craniocerebral RT group and EGFR-TKI only group was 52.0 months and 43.2 months, respectively (p = 0.0363). In total of 417 patients who underwent craniocerebral RT, were enrolled subsequently and divided into groups A (Lung-molGPA 1-2) and B (Lung-molGPA 2.5-4) according to the lung-molGPA score. For group A, the median OS of upfront-group and delay-group was 27 and 42.1 months, respectively (p = 0.0019). For patients in group B, there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups (p = 0.9642).

CONCLUSION

For patients with craniocerebral metastases of EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, combination of EGFR-TKIs and craniocerebral RT confers enhanced survival benefits. In patients with lower Lung-molGPA scores, delayed administration of craniocerebral RT is recommended to improve both iPFS and OS.

A Podcast Discussion on the Intracranial Efficacy of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Patients with EGFR-Mutated NSCLC with Brain Metastases

The incidence of brain metastases is higher in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than in patients with most other cancers, and the development of brain metastases is associated with poor prognosis. The objective of the podcast is to provide information about current and future treatments for brain metastases that develop in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The panel discusses surveillance and management of patients with brain metastases, different types of currently used treatments, and recent data on the intracranial efficacy of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). The panel also discusses current and future studies of ADCs in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC with brain metastases. This podcast discussion, among four oncologists (two thoracic oncologists, one radiation oncologist, and one neurologist/neuro-oncologist), is for healthcare professionals (HCPs) at community practices and research institutions.

A novel clinical brain prognostic index for KRAS-mutated lung cancer and brain metastases (KRAS-BPI): Real-world evidence from two large European centers

INTRODUCTION

Several prognostic scores were developed for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BM), though limited data reported for the KRAS-mutated subgroup. KRAS-targeted therapies have improved extracranial and intracranial response, highlighting the need for reliable prognostic biomarkers.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort (2010-2020) comprising 220 patients with BM KRAS-mutated NSCLC from two large academic Thoracic Oncology centers (Karolinska and Heidelberg) was analyzed. Clinicopathological parameters were collected from electronic health records. Prognostic factors of overall survival from BM diagnosis (BM-OS) were identified using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 65 years, with a female predominance (55.9 %). Adenocarcinoma was the dominant histological subtype, performance status (PS) was 0-2 in 91 % of the patients and one-third had > 4 BMs. Variables independently correlated with BM-OS included the presence of primary BM disease, PS, age, symptomatic CNS disease, extracranial metastases and number of BM, and were used to design a new KRAS-Brain Prognostic Index (KRAS-BPI). Patients with high-index score showed significantly longer BM-OS, compared to intermediate/low-index groups (median BM-OS = 30.0 vs 9.0 vs 2.0 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest real-word data study of KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients with BM, we developed a novel prognostic tool for improved patient stratification.

Adagrasib in the Treatment of KRAS p.G12C Positive Advanced NSCLC: Design, Development and Place in Therapy

One of the most common mutations seen in lung cancers are mutations in Kristen Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS), observed in 25-30% of patients with NSCLC. Mutations in KRAS result in oncogenesis via persistent activation of the MAPK/ERK pathways. Although once thought to be "undruggable", KRAS p.G12C inhibitors such as sotorasib and adagrasib have been developed. This paper focuses on adagrasib, the second KRAS p.G12C inhibitor to obtain regulatory approval by the FDA and describes the details on its study design, development and current place in therapy.

BMScope: A scoping review to chart the evolving clinical study landscape in brain and leptomeningeal metastasis

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have challenged the notion that patients with brain metastasis (BM) or leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) should be excluded from systemic therapy clinical trials. This scoping study summarizes the BM/LM clinical studies published between 2010 and 2023.

METHODS

MEDLINE, CINAHL, CAB Abstracts, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, HINARI, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE electronic databases were searched on June 21, 2021. An updated search was performed on February 21, 2023. Eligible studies investigated a therapeutic intervention in solid tumor patients with BM and/or LM and reported a patient outcome. Extracted study-level data, including study type, publication date, geographical location, number of BM/LM patients in the study, primary tumor type, and type of therapeutic intervention, were collected.

RESULTS

4921 unique studies were eligible for analysis. The key finding is that BM/LM clinical research is expanding globally, both in observational studies and clinical trials. Despite the shift over time toward a higher proportion of systemic therapy trials, the majority still do not include patients with symptomatic disease and lack reporting of BM/LM-specific endpoints. Globally, there has been a trend to more international collaboration in BM/LM clinical studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis of the BM/LM literature charts the evolving landscape of studies involving this previously excluded population. Given the increasing clinical research activity, particularly involving late-stage systemic therapy trials, it is imperative that due consideration is given to the intracranial activity of new investigational agents. Wider adoption of standardized reporting of intracranial-specific endpoints will facilitate the evaluation of relative intracranial efficacy.

Lung Cancer with Brain Metastasis-Treatment Strategies and Molecular Characteristics

Lung cancer is a leading cause of brain metastases (BMs), with 10-20% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presenting with BMs at diagnosis and 25-50% developing them over the course of their disease. Historically, BMs have posed significant therapeutic challenges, partly due to the blood brain barrier (BBB), which restricts drug penetration to the central nervous system. Consequently, BMs were initially managed with local treatments, including surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery, and whole brain radiation therapy. In recent years, however, systemic treatments for BMs have advanced significantly, particularly with the development of molecularly-targeted therapies and immunotherapies. The discovery of driver mutations and the development of novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have yielded encouraging intracranial responses in NSCLC patients with actionable genetic alterations (e.g., EGFR, ALK, ROS1). Genomic profiling has also suggested genetic heterogeneity between BMs and primary sites. Immunotherapies, alone or in combination with other treatments, have demonstrated promising results in NSCLC with BMs, although most clinical trials have included only selected patients with asymptomatic or previously treated BMs. In this review, we discuss the molecular and immune characteristics of NSCLC with BMs, analyze intracranial efficacy findings from clinical trials, and explore treatment strategies for lung cancer patients with BMs.

[Non-small cell lung cancer in adults under 40 years of age]

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are the most common lung cancers, withpeak incidence at 65years of age. These cancers rarely occur before the age of 40.

METHODS

Based on an illustrative clinical case, a systematic review of the literature was conducted to study the epidemiological, clinical, histological, and biological characteristics of NSCLC in adults under 40years of age. Two equations were developed to search for articles on Medline and Scopus.

RESULTS

Sixty-five articles were included in the review; 1.7% of patients were under 40years old, 50.7% were women, 66.7% presented adenocarcinoma, 51.9% were diagnosed at stage IV, 75% were non-smokers, 39.9% were exposed to other toxins, 33% had an EGFR mutation, 6.6% had a KRAS mutation, 25% had an ALK translocation, 73.7% were symptomatic, and over 75% had PS<2.

CONCLUSION

NSCLC in patients under 40years of age presents characteristics different from those in older patients. Various factors are implicated, one example being lower exposure to tobacco, and they can influence the distribution of histological subtypes and the frequency of mutations.

Immunotherapy benefits for large brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with large brain metastases (BrM) defined as >2 cm in diameter historically face grim prognoses. With immunotherapy emerging as a promising avenue for BrM management and being commonly used in NSCLC, its application in addressing large BrM remains underexplored.

METHODS

This retrospective study conducted across the MedStar Georgetown Cancer Network aimed to assess the efficacy of immunotherapy in non-biomarker driven NSCLC patients with large BrM following initial treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included, all of whom underwent neurosurgery and/or radiation before commencing immunotherapy. The median intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.2 months and the median overall survival (OS) reached 31 months. Utilizing multivariable Cox penalized regression, the intracranial PFS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.07 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.26) for patients who received at least 90 days of immunotherapy compared to those who did not. Each additional 30 days of immunotherapy was associated with an OS HR 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.90).

CONCLUSION

This real-world data highlights the potential of immunotherapy in large BrM NSCLC patients, a population often excluded from clinical trials. This study contributes insights that can inform future treatment approaches, emphasizing the need for further exploration of immunotherapy's role in enhancing outcomes for this challenging patient population.

2.5D deep learning based on multi-parameter MRI to differentiate primary lung cancer pathological subtypes in patients with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BMs) represents a severe neurological complication stemming from cancers originating from various sources. It is a highly challenging clinical task to accurately distinguish the pathological subtypes of brain metastatic tumors from lung cancer (LC).The utility of 2.5-dimensional (2.5D) deep learning (DL) in distinguishing pathological subtypes of LC with BMs is yet to be determined.

METHODS

A total of 250 patients were included in this retrospective study, divided in a 7:3 ratio into training set (N=175) and testing set (N=75). We devised a method to assemble a series of two-dimensional (2D) images by extracting adjacent slices from a central slice in both superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions to form a 2.5D dataset. Multi-Instance learning (MIL) is a weakly supervised learning method that organizes training instances into "bags" and provides labels for entire bags, with the purpose of learning a classifier based on the labeled positive and negative bags to predict the corresponding class for an unknown bag. Therefore, we employed MIL to construct a comprehensive 2.5D feature set. Then we used the single-slice as input for constructing the 2D model. DL features were extracted from these slices using the pre-trained ResNet101. All feature sets were inputted into the support vector machine (SVM) for evaluation. The diagnostic performance of the classification models were evaluated using five-fold cross-validation, with accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) metrics calculated for analysis.

RESULTS

The optimal performance was obtained using the 2.5D DL model, which achieved the micro-AUC of 0.868 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.817-0.919) and accuracy of 0.836 in the test cohort. The 2D model achieved the micro-AUC of 0.836 (95 % CI, 0.778-0.894) and accuracy of 0.827 in the test cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed 2.5D DL model is feasible and effective in identifying pathological subtypes of BMs from lung cancer.

Five-year outcomes with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with 2 cycles of chemotherapy versus 4 cycles of chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the randomized CheckMate 9LA trial

BACKGROUND

We report 5-year efficacy and safety outcomes from CheckMate 9LA in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and exploratory analyses in key patient subgroups.

METHODS

Adults with stage IV/recurrent NSCLC and no sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were randomized to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy (n = 361) or chemotherapy (n = 358). Outcomes were assessed in all randomized patients and subgroups.

RESULTS

With 57.3 months' minimum follow-up, patients continued to derive overall survival (OS) benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy over chemotherapy (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.85; 5-year OS rates, 18% vs. 11%), regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (PD-L1 < 1%, 22% vs. 8%; PD-L1 ≥ 1%, 18% vs. 11%), histology (squamous, 18% vs. 7%; non-squamous, 19% vs. 12%), or presence of baseline brain metastases (20% vs. 6%). Five-year duration of response (DOR) rates were 19% versus 8% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, with consistent benefit across subgroups. Patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy due to treatment-related adverse events had a 5-year OS rate of 37%. Five-year progression-free survival and DOR rates in 5-year survivors were 55% versus 38% and 59% versus 46%, respectively. No new safety signals were observed in 5-year survivors, regardless of the number of ipilimumab doses received.

CONCLUSION

This 5-year update supports the long-term, durable OS benefit and improved 5-year survivorship with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy over chemotherapy in patients with mNSCLC, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression or histology.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV REGISTRATION

NCT03215706.

Treatment of brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: preclinical, clinical, and translational research

Lung cancer is the second most common type of cancer and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Approximately 10-40% of patients with solid tumors develop brain metastases, with non-small cell lung cancer accounting for approximately 50% of all cases of patients with brain metastases. Many management options are available which can include surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy. A variety of factors go into the selection of management of brain metastases. In this review, we will focus on the treatment strategies and optimizing the management of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Central Nervous System Metastases

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent an emerging class of targeted anticancer agents that have demonstrated impressive efficacy in numerous cancer types. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), ADCs have become a component of the treatment armamentarium for a subset of patients with metastatic disease. Emerging data suggest that some ADCs exhibit impressive activity even in central nervous system (CNS) metastases, a disease site that is difficult to treat and associated with poor prognosis. Herein, we describe and summarize the existing evidence surrounding ADCs in NSCLC with a focus on CNS activity.

[First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed with brain metastases]

INTRODUCTION

Up to 30% patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with brain metastases. In the absence of oncogenic addiction, first-line immunotherapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, is the current standard of care. This review aims to synthesize the available data regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in these patients, and to discuss the possibility of its being coordinated with local treatments such as radiotherapy.

STATE OF THE ART

NSCLC patients with brain metastases appear to have survival benefits with immunotherapy similar to those of NSCLC patients without brain metastases. However, this finding is based on mainly prospective studies having included highly selected patients with pre-treated and stable brain metastases. Several retrospective studies and two prospective single-arm studies have confirmed the intracranial efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy.

PERSPECTIVES

The indications and optimal timing for cerebral radiotherapy remain subjects of debate. To date, there exists no randomized study assessing the addition of brain radiotherapy to first-line immunotherapy. That said, a recent meta-analysis showed increased intracerebral response when radiotherapy complemented immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

For NSCLC patients with brain metastases, the available data suggest a clear benefit of first-line immunotherapy, whether alone or combined with chemotherapy. However, most of these data are drawn from retrospective, non-randomized studies with small sample sizes.

Development of brain metastases in patients managed with non-curative thoracic radiotherapy for stage II/III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study analyzed the incidence of subsequent brain metastases after palliative radiotherapy or chemoradiation in patients with stage II/III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Risk factors for brain metastases development and survival after diagnosis were evaluated.

METHODS

Different baseline parameters including but not limited to age, stage and target volume size were assessed. Outcomes were abstracted from electronic health records. Uni- and multivariate tests were performed.

RESULTS

The study included 102 patients and found an actuarial risk of brain metastases of 15% (standard error ± 4) at one year and 20% (± 5) at two years. The maximum time interval was 15 months from start of radiation treatment. A non-significant survival difference was observed (median 12 months without versus 8.3 months with brain metastases, p = 0.21). Incidence was higher in patients with N2/3 stage, larger planning target volume size, and younger age (univariately significant factors). Trends were seen for stage III and adenocarcinoma histology. The multivariate analysis confirmed age as the most important risk factor.

CONCLUSION

The risk of brain metastases development was comparable to that reported in studies of curative chemoradiation. All events occurred within 15 months of follow-up, suggesting that long-term surveillance imaging may not be warranted. Patients younger than 60 years had a very high risk of brain metastases development.

MicroRNAs in Lung Cancer Brain Metastasis

Brain metastasis is a significant clinical challenge for patients with advanced lung cancer, occurring in about 20-40% of cases. Brain metastasis causes severe neurological symptoms, leading to a poor prognosis and contributing significantly to lung cancer-related mortality. However, the underlying molecular mechanism behind brain metastasis remains largely unknown. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNAs linked to several aspects of cancer progression, including metastasis. In the context of lung cancer, significant research has shown the involvement of miRNAs in regulating critical pathways related to metastatic spread to the brain. This review summarizes the scientific evidence regarding the regulatory roles of intra- and extracellular miRNAs, which specifically drive the spread of lung cancer cells to the brain. It also revises the known molecular mechanisms of brain metastasis, focusing on those from lung cancer as the primary tumor to better understand the complex mechanisms underlying this regulation. Understanding these complex regulatory mechanisms holds promise for developing novel diagnostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic strategies in brain metastasis.

Immunotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Is it really a no-brainer?

There is still much progress to be made in understanding the underlying mechanisms of brain metastasis development and its optimal therapy in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); it is very important to expand research in this area because brain metastasis strongly affects patients' quality of life and overall survival. This editorial reviews the available data in the context of a recent meta‐analysis of the pivotal IMpower130, IMpower131, and IMpower150 studies, which explores metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase wild‐type NSCLC to determine potential preventative factors and risk factors for the development of brain metastasis, specifically the question of whether immunotherapy (the anti–programmed death ligand 1 antibody, atezolizumab in particular) plays a role in preventing brain metastasis.

Tepotinib plus osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with MET amplification following progression on first-line osimertinib (INSIGHT 2): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and MET amplification as a mechanism of resistance to first-line osimertinib have few treatment options. Here, we report the primary analysis of the phase 2 INSIGHT 2 study evaluating tepotinib, a highly selective MET inhibitor, combined with osimertinib in this population.

METHODS

This open-label, phase 2 study was conducted at 179 academic centres and community clinics in 17 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC of any histology, with MET amplification by tissue biopsy fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH; MET gene copy number of ≥5 or MET-to-CEP7 ratio of ≥2) or liquid biopsy next-generation sequencing (MET plasma gene copy number of ≥2·3), following progression on first-line osimertinib. Patients received oral tepotinib 500 mg plus oral osimertinib 80 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was independently assessed objective response in patients with MET amplification by central FISH treated with tepotinib plus osimertinib with at least 9 months of follow-up. Safety was analysed in patients who received at least one study drug dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03940703 (enrolment complete).

FINDINGS

Between Feb 13, 2020, and Nov 4, 2022, 128 patients (74 [58%] female, 54 [42%] male) were enrolled and initiated tepotinib plus osimertinib. The primary activity analysis population included 98 patients with MET amplification confirmed by central FISH, previous first-line osimertinib and at least 9 months of follow-up (median 12·7 months [IQR 9·9-20·3]). The confirmed objective response rate was 50·0% (95% CI 39·7-60·3; 49 of 98 patients). The most common treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events were peripheral oedema (six [5%] of 128 patients), decreased appetite (five [4%]), prolonged electrocardiogram QT interval (five [4%]), and pneumonitis (four [3%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in 16 (13%) patients. Deaths of four (3%) patients were assessed as potentially related to either trial drug by the investigator due to pneumonitis (two [2%] patients), decreased platelet count (one [1%]), respiratory failure (one [1%]), and dyspnoea (one [1%]); one death was attributed to both pneumonitis and dyspnoea.

INTERPRETATION

Tepotinib plus osimertinib showed promising activity and acceptable safety in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and MET amplification as a mechanism of resistance to first-line osimertinib, suggesting a potential chemotherapy-sparing oral targeted therapy option that should be further investigated.

FUNDING

Merck (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945).

Immunotherapy revolutionizing brain metastatic cancer treatment: personalized strategies for transformative outcomes

Brain metastatic cancer poses a significant clinical challenge, with limited treatment options and poor prognosis for patients. In recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for addressing brain metastases, offering distinct advantages over conventional treatments. This review explores the evolving landscape of tumor immunotherapy in the context of brain metastatic cancer, focusing on the intricate interplay between the tumor microenvironment (TME) and immunotherapeutic approaches. By elucidating the complex interactions within the TME, including the role of immune cells, cytokines, and extracellular matrix components, this review highlights the potential of immunotherapy to reshape the treatment paradigm for brain metastases. Leveraging immune checkpoint inhibitors, cellular immunotherapies, and personalized treatment strategies, immunotherapy holds promise in overcoming the challenges posed by the blood-brain barrier and immunosuppressive microenvironment of brain metastases. Through a comprehensive analysis of current research findings and future directions, this review underscores the transformative impact of immunotherapy on the management of brain metastatic cancer, offering new insights and opportunities for personalized and precise therapeutic interventions.

Brain metastases in clinical trial participants with KRAS-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving docetaxel: Pooled data analysis

OBJECTIVES

Limited data are available on central nervous system (CNS) efficacy with standard-of-care therapies for KRAS-mutated (KRASmut) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence and progression of brain metastases in KRASmut advanced NSCLC treated with docetaxel using pooled data from historical clinical trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from phase 2/3 trials of docetaxel-containing regimens in advanced NSCLC were sourced from the Medidata platform. Analysis was restricted to stage IIIB-IV KRASmut NSCLC with disease progression after ≥ 1 systemic anticancer therapy. Participants with asymptomatic, treated, and stable brain metastases were included. Endpoints included 12-month CNS disease control rate (CNS-DCR) and CNS progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; progression-free survival (PFS); and overall survival (OS). Data were pooled and analyses stratified by baseline brain metastases status.

RESULTS

A total of 595 participants were included in the analysis (62 [10%] with baseline brain metastases and 533 [90 %] without). Among participants with brain metastases, 17 (27.4 %) had CNS progression during docetaxel treatment and 12-month CNS-DCR was 75.8 %; 45 (8.4 %) participants without baseline brain metastases developed brain metastases during treatment. In an analysis restricted to patients with metastatic disease, outcomes with and without baseline brain metastases included: median PFS, 3.3 and 4.9 months (p < 0.005); 12-month PFS, 5 % and 16 %; median OS, 6.9 and 10.4 months (p < 0.005); and 12-month OS, 20 % and 44 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These findings establish CNS progression rates with docetaxel in previously treated KRASmut advanced NSCLC and facilitate interpretation of data from ongoing randomized clinical trials of novel KRAS-targeted therapeutic strategies vs. docetaxel.

Prevention of Brain Metastases: A New Frontier

This review discusses the topic of prevention of brain metastases from the most frequent solid tumor types, i.e., lung cancer, breast cancer and melanoma. Within each tumor type, the risk of brain metastasis is related to disease status and molecular subtype (i.e., EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, BRAF and NRAF-mutant melanoma). Prophylactic cranial irradiation is the standard of care in patients in small cell lung cancer responsive to chemotherapy but at the price of late neurocognitive decline. More recently, several molecular agents with the capability to target molecular alterations driving tumor growth have proven as effective in the prevention of secondary relapse into the brain in clinical trials. This is the case for EGFR-mutant or ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer inhibitors, tucatinib and trastuzumab-deruxtecan for HER2-positive breast cancer and BRAF inhibitors for melanoma. The need for screening with an MRI in asymptomatic patients at risk of brain metastases is emphasized.

Integrated whole-exome and bulk transcriptome sequencing delineates the dynamic evolution from preneoplasia to invasive lung adenocarcinoma featured with ground-glass nodules

OBJECTIVE

The genomic and molecular ecology involved in the stepwise continuum progression of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) from adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) to minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and subsequent invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) remains unclear and requires further elucidation. We aimed to characterize gene mutations and expression landscapes, and explore the association between differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and significantly mutated genes (SMGs) during the dynamic evolution from AIS to IAC.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with ground-glass nodules (GGNs) lung adenocarcinomas were enrolled. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) and transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) were conducted on all patients, encompassing both tumor samples and corresponding noncancerous tissues. Data obtained from WES and RNA-Seq were subsequently analyzed.

RESULTS

The findings from WES delineated that the predominant mutations were observed in EGFR (49%) and ANKRD36C (17%). SMGs, including EGFR and RBM10, were associated with the dynamic evolution from AIS to IAC. Meanwhile, DEGs, including GPR143, CCR9, ADAMTS16, and others were associated with the entire process of invasive LUAD. We found that the signaling pathways related to cell migration and invasion were upregulated, and the signaling pathways of angiogenesis were downregulated across the pathological stages. Furthermore, we found that the messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of FAM83A, MAL2, DEPTOR, and others were significantly correlated with CNVs. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed that heme metabolism and cholesterol homeostasis pathways were significantly upregulated in patients with EGFR/RBM10 co-mutations, and these patients may have poorer overall survival than those with EGFR mutations. Based on the six calculation methods for the immune infiltration score, NK/CD8+ T cells decreased, and Treg/B cells increased with the progression of early LUAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings offer valuable insights into the unique genomic and molecular features of LUAD, facilitating the identification and advancement of precision medicine strategies targeting the invasive progression of LUAD from AIS to IAC.

Targeted therapeutic options in early and metastatic NSCLC-overview

The complex therapeutic strategy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed significantly in recent years. Disease-free survival increased significantly with immunotherapy and chemotherapy registered in perioperative treatments, as well as adjuvant registered immunotherapy and targeted therapy (osimertinib) in case of EGFR mutation. In oncogenic-addictive metastatic NSCLC, primarily in adenocarcinoma, the range of targeted therapies is expanding, with which the expected overall survival increases significantly, measured in years. By 2021, the FDA and EMA have approved targeted agents to inhibit EGFR activating mutations, T790 M resistance mutation, BRAF V600E mutation, ALK, ROS1, NTRK and RET fusion. In 2022, the range of authorized target therapies was expanded. With therapies that inhibit KRASG12C, EGFR exon 20, HER2 and MET. Until now, there was no registered targeted therapy for the KRAS mutations, which affect 30% of adenocarcinomas. Thus, the greatest expectation surrounded the inhibition of the KRAS G12C mutation, which occurs in ∼15% of NSCLC, mainly in smokers and is characterized by a poor prognosis. Sotorasib and adagrasib are approved as second-line agents after at least one prior course of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Adagrasib in first-line combination with pembrolizumab immunotherapy proved more beneficial, especially in patients with high expression of PD-L1. In EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation of lung adenocarcinoma, amivantanab was registered for progression after platinum-based chemotherapy. Lung adenocarcinoma carries an EGFR exon 20, HER2 insertion mutation in 2%, for which the first targeted therapy is trastuzumab deruxtecan, in patients already treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Two orally administered selective c-MET inhibitors, capmatinib and tepotinib, were also approved after chemotherapy in adenocarcinoma carrying MET exon 14 skipping mutations of about 3%. Incorporating reflex testing with next-generation sequencing (NGS) expands personalized therapies by identifying guideline-recommended molecular alterations.

Intracranial Efficacy of Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel in Real-World Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and EGFR or ALK Alterations

Contrary to Pemetrexed-containing chemo-immunotherapy studies, Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel (ABCP) treatment has consistently shown clinical benefit in prospective studies in patients with lung cancer and actionable mutations, where intracranial metastases are common. Here, we aimed to describe the real-life population of patients fit to receive ABCP after targeted therapy and quantify its clinical effect in patients with brain metastases. Patients treated in Cheshire and Merseyside between 2019 and 2022 were identified. Data were collected retrospectively. A total of 34 patients with actionable EGFR or ALK alterations had treatment with a median age of 59 years (range 32-77). The disease control rate was 100% in patients with PDL1 ≥ 1% (n = 10). In total, 19 patients (56%) had brain metastases before starting ABCP, 17 (50%) had untreated CNS disease, and 4 (22%) had PDL1 ≥ 1%. The median time to symptom improvement was 12.5 days (range 4-21 days), with 74% intracranial disease control rates and 89.5% synchronous intracranial (IC) and extracranial (EC) responses. IC median Progression Free Survival (mPFS) was 6.48 months, EC mPFS was 10.75 months, and median Overall Survival 11.47 months. ABCP in real-life patients with brain metastases (treated or untreated) was feasible and showed similar efficacy to that described in patients without actionable mutations treated with upfront chemo-immunotherapy.

Clinical application of the Lung Cancer Compact PanelTM using various types of cytological specimens in patients with lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The Lung Cancer Compact PanelTM (compact panel) is a gene panel that can detect driver alterations with high sensitivity in liquid samples, including tumor cells. This study examined the ability of a compact panel to detect genetic mutations in liquid specimens used in clinical practice.

METHODS

Three cohorts, bronchoscopic biopsy forceps washing (washing cohort), pleural effusion (pleural cohort), and spinal fluid (spinal cohort), were analyzed using the compact panel. Liquid samples were added into the GM (Genemetrics) tubes and analyzed. The washing cohort assessed the concordance rate of gene panel analysis outcomes in tissue specimens derived from the primary tumor. Meanwhile, the pleural cohort investigated the impact of storing specimens for 8 weeks and more on nucleic acid and mutation detection rates.

RESULTS

In the washing cohort (n = 79), the concordance rate with mutations detected in tissues was 75/79 (94.9 %). This rate reached 100 % when focusing solely on driver alterations for treatment. The pleural cohort (n = 8) showed no deterioration in nucleic acid quality or quantity after 8 weeks of storage in GM tubes. Similarly, in the spinal cohort (n = 9), spinal fluid with malignant cells exhibited driver alterations similar to those in the primary tumor. These findings underscore the efficacy of the compact panel in accurately identifying genetic mutations in different liquid specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The compact panel is a reliable tool for detecting driver alterations in various cytological specimens. Its consistent performance across diverse sample types emphasizes its potential for guiding targeted therapies for patients with lung cancer and enhancing precision medicine approaches.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Lorlatinib in Japanese Patients With ALK-Positive Advanced NSCLC-A Brief Report From the CROWN Study

Introduction

Lorlatinib was found to have improved efficacy versus crizotinib in the global phase 3 CROWN study (NCT03052608). Similar results were revealed for the Japanese population as for the overall population. We present results from the unplanned 3-year follow-up from the CROWN study in Japanese patients.

Methods

Patients were randomized to either lorlatinib 100 mg once daily (n = 25) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (n = 23). The primary end point was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included objective and intracranial responses assessed by blinded independent central review and safety.

Results

At the data cutoff of September 20, 2021, median progression-free survival was not reached with lorlatinib and 11.1 months with crizotinib (hazard ratio = 0.36). Objective response rate was 72.0% with lorlatinib and 52.2% with crizotinib. For patients with baseline brain metastases, intracranial response rate was 100.0% versus 28.6% with lorlatinib versus crizotinib. Nine patients in the lorlatinib group received more than or equal to 1 subsequent anticancer systemic therapy, with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor as the most common first subsequent therapy. The safety profile was consistent with that reported previously, with no new safety signals.

Conclusions

This updated analysis in the Japanese population revealed prolonged benefits of lorlatinib over crizotinib in patients with treatment-naive advanced ALK-positive NSCLC with and those without brain metastases.

Real world study of safety and efficacy of lorlatinib as second line and beyond in ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in India - a multicentre chart review study (ROSELAND)

Background

Lorlatinib, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-inhibitor, is approved as frontline as well as subsequent line of therapy in ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There is limited literature about safety and efficacy of lorlatinib in Indian patients.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective multicentre study on patients with ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC received lorlatinib as second line and beyond between May 2017 and December 2021. ALK was tested either by immunohistochemistry or fluorescent in-situ hybridisation. Clinicopathologic features, treatment details, toxicity and outcomes were analysed.

Results

A total of 38 patients were enrolled with a median age of 54 years (range: 30-72) and male: female ratio of 20:18. Fifteen (44%) patients had brain metastases at baseline. Lorlatinib use was - second line in 11 (29%), third line in 21 (55%) and fourth line in 4 (11%) of patients, respectively. The best radiologic response to lorlatinib was - complete response in 9 (24%), partial response in 17 (46%), stable disease in 9 (24%) and progressive disease in 2 (5%) of patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 76.6 months (95% CI: 68.9-100), the median progression-free survival (PFS) of lorlatinib was not reached (95% CI: 24.3-not reached) and median overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort was 93.1 months (95% CI: 62-not reached). Both median PFS (p = 0.48) and median OS (p = 0.74) was similar between second line and later line use of lorlatinib. Thirty-three (87%) patients experienced treatment-related toxicity and six (16%) patients required dose modification.

Conclusion

Lorlatinib was highly efficacious in terms of overall response rate, median PFS and median OS in this small real-world cohort of advanced ALK+ve NSCLC with a manageable safety profile.

Spine Metastasis Is Associated with the Development of Brain Metastasis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Background and Objectives: The mechanisms involved in the development of brain metastasis (BM) remain elusive. Here, we investigated whether BM is associated with spine involvement in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and Methods: A consecutive 902 patients with metastatic NSCLC were included from the Inha Lung Cancer Cohort. Patients with BM at diagnosis or subsequent BM development were evaluated for both spine involvement in NSCLC and anatomic proximity of BM to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space. Results: At diagnosis, BM was found in 238 patients (26.4%) and bone metastasis was found in 393 patients (43.6%). In patients with bone metastasis, spine involvement was present in 280 patients. BM subsequently developed in 82 (28.9%) of 284 patients without BM at diagnosis. The presence of spine metastasis was associated with BM at diagnosis and subsequent BM development (adjusted odd ratios and 95% confidence intervals = 2.42 and 1.74-3.37, p < 0.001; 1.94 and 1.19-3.18, p = 0.008, respectively). Most patients with spine metastasis, either with BM at diagnosis or subsequent BM, showed BM lesions located adjacent (within 5mm) to the CSF space (93.8% of BM at the diagnosis, 100% of subsequent BM). Conclusions: These findings suggest that the presence of spine involvement is a risk factor for BM development in NSCLC patients with bone metastasis.

Emerging therapeutics and evolving assessment criteria for intracranial metastases in patients with oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer

The improved survival outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), largely owing to the improved control of systemic disease provided by immune-checkpoint inhibitors and novel targeted therapies, have highlighted the challenges posed by central nervous system (CNS) metastases as a devastating yet common complication, with up to 50% of patients developing such lesions during the course of the disease. Early-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) often provide robust systemic disease control in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLCs, although these agents are usually unable to accumulate to therapeutically relevant concentrations in the CNS owing to an inability to cross the blood-brain barrier. However, the past few years have seen a paradigm shift with the emergence of several novel or later-generation TKIs with improved CNS penetrance. Such agents have promising levels of activity against brain metastases, as demonstrated by data from preclinical and clinical studies. In this Review, we describe current preclinical and clinical evidence of the intracranial activity of TKIs targeting various oncogenic drivers in patients with NSCLC, with a focus on newer agents with enhanced CNS penetration, leptomeningeal disease and the need for intrathecal treatment options. We also discuss evolving assessment criteria and regulatory considerations for future clinical investigations.