Failed Pyeloplasty in Children: Comparative Analysis of Retrograde Endopyelotomy Versus Redo Pyeloplasty

The missed crossing vessel during open pyeloplasty: a potential advantage of the robot-assisted approach in children

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the panoramic view offered by robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) reduces the likelihood of missing a crossing vessel compared to open pyeloplasty in cases where initial pyeloplasty fails.

METHODS

A single institution redo-pyeloplasty database was reviewed for children treated between January 2012 to July 2023. Clinical history, imaging and operative details were reviewed to identify the etiology for the redo procedure.

RESULTS

Cohort consisted of 45 patients undergoing a redo RALP during the study period. 29 of 45 patients had an initial open surgical approach, whereas 16 had an initial RALP. 10 patients were noted to have a missed crossing vessel on redo pyeloplasty - 9 had an initial open approach whereas 1 had an initial RALP (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

RALP may reduce the risk of missing a crossing vessel due to the panoramic view of the surgical field intrinsic to an intraperitoneal RALP approach.

The construction of a nomogram to predict the prognosis and recurrence risks of UPJO

Objective

This study was conducted to explore the risk factors for the prognosis and recurrence of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

Methods

The correlation of these variables with the prognosis and recurrence risks was analyzed by binary and multivariate logistic regression. Besides, a nomogram was constructed based on the multivariate logistic regression calculation. After the model was verified by the C-statistic, the ROC curve was plotted to evaluate the sensitivity of the model. Finally, the decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to estimate the clinical benefits and losses of intervention measures under a series of risk thresholds.

Results

Preoperative automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI), preoperative renal parenchymal thickness (RPT), Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score, and surgeon proficiency were the high-risk factors for the prognosis and recurrence of UPJO. In addition, a nomogram was constructed based on the above 5 variables. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.8831 after self cross-validation, which validated that the specificity of the model was favorable.

Conclusion

The column chart constructed by five factors has good predictive ability for the prognosis and recurrence of UPJO, which may provide more reasonable guidance for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

Recurrent UPJ obstruction following paediatric pyeloplasty is associated with an initial <2.5cm incision open surgical approach

OBJECTIVES

To determine the risk factors that affect surgical outcomes for pediatric pyeloplasty, and whether this may be related to the choice of operative approach.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate clinicodemographic and operative characteristics of children undergoing dismemberment pyeloplasty by 2 senior pediatric urologists in our tertiary institution between Jan 2008 - Dec 2017. Outcomes included overall complications, re-stenosis, and revision pyeloplasty based on clinic-radiological parameters. Bivariate analysis with Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test followed by multivariate logistic regression with backward likelihood analysis determined an adjusted effect estimate of the identified significant indicators for inferior peri-operative outcomes related to management.

RESULTS

A total of 185 (93 open, 92 Laparoscopic) cases with an average follow-up of 31.3±27.4 months were analyzed. Complications occurred in 21 (11.4%) patients. 12 (6.5%) experienced recurrent UPJ obstruction with 10 (5.4%) undergoing redo-pyeloplasty. Of these, 9 were performed open and 1 laparoscopically. Multivariate logistic regression identified open pyeloplasty as an independent predictor for overall complications (HR 3.29, 95%CI 1.14, 9.51), recurrent UPJ obstruction (HR 49.8, 95%CI 3.09, 803.2) and redo-pyeloplasty (HR 9.75, 95%CI 1.21, 78.6) compared to a laparoscopic approach. Missed crossing vessels were identified in seven redo-cases, which all were from prior open pyeloplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

An initial open approach was identified as an independent predictor of future complications due to a higher incidence missed crossing vessels at initial repair. Surgeons need to remain especially mindful of this phenomenon when working in a confined open field.

Comparison of Secondary and Primary Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty in the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To compare the outcomes of secondary minimally invasive pyeloplasty (MIP) versus primary MIP for the patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Materials and Methods: We searched all the literature of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library comparing secondary MIP and primary MIP and performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Results: We included 15 studies involving 1637 patients with 1371 in the primary MIP group and 266 in the secondary MIP group. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stays, and the risk of hematuria, urinary tract infection, intestinal obstruction, stent complications, and overall complications (P > .05). Comparing with the secondary MIP group, the primary MIP group has shorter operative time (mean difference [MD] = -36.91 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -50.21 to -23.62, P < .00001), less estimated blood loss (MD = -16.70 mL, 95% CI: -31.60 to -1.80, P = .03), lower risk of urinary leakage and injury of blood vessel (relative risk [RR] = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.11-0.93, P = .04) (RR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02-0.61, P = .01), and higher success rate (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11, P = .003). The robot-assisted pyeloplasty is superior to the laparoscopic pyeloplasty in controlling the amount of blood loss in the secondary operation. Conclusions: Considering the poorer outcomes of secondary surgery, we believe that special attention should be paid to not missing crossing vessels, and it would be more prudent to perform a more definitive procedure with pyeloplasty instead of endopyelotomy for primary UPJO.

Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Propensity score matched analyses of a high-volume center

PURPOSE

Review the experience of redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RLP) in patients with recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in comparison to primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty (PLP) and redo open pyeloplasty (ROP), and determine the feasibility and effectiveness of RLP for recurrent UPJO in children.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients treated with transperitoneal PLP, RLP, and ROP for UPJO from December 2015 to December 2022. The Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance confounding variables. RLP patients were 1:4 matched with PLP and 1:3 matched with ROP. The primary outcomes were failure and post-operative complications. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo grading system.

RESULTS

The study included ten patients who underwent RLP, 43 patients who underwent ROP, and 412 patients who underwent PLP. The follow-up time ranged from 6 to 36 months in the RLP group, 12 to 60 months in the PLP group, and 24 to 54 months in the ROP group. In the RLP group, no failure but three post-operative complications (Clavien grade II) were observed during the follow-up. Compared with the PLP group, the older age, higher weight, larger pre-operative anteroposterior diameter (APD) and APD/cortical thickness (P/C ratio), longer operation time, and post-operative length of stay (LOS) in the RLP group (P < 0.05). After PSM, longer operation time and post-operative LOS were observed in the RLP group (P < 0.05). Compared with the ROP group, the older age, higher weight, and longer post-operative LOS in the RLP group (P < 0.05). After PSM, longer post-operative LOS was observed in the ROP group (P < 0.05). The failure and complication rates were comparable between RLP and PLP or RLP and ROP (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our result demonstrated that RLP performed as well as PLP except for a longer operation time. Compared with ROP, RLP has the advantages of a clearer surgical view, sufficient exposure, clearer anatomical landmark position, and minor trauma with a comparable clinical outcome. On experienced hands, RLP for recurrent UPJO after is a safe and effective procedure and should be considered an excellent alternative to the more commonly recommended ROP in select patients.

Personalized application of machine learning algorithms to identify pediatric patients at risk for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after dismembered pyeloplasty

PURPOSE

To develop a model that predicts whether a child will develop a recurrent obstruction after pyeloplasty, determine their survival risk score, and expected time to re-intervention using machine learning (ML).

METHODS

We reviewed patients undergoing pyeloplasty from 2008 to 2020 at our institution, including all children and adolescents younger than 18 years. We developed a two-stage machine learning model from 34 clinical fields, which included patient characteristics, ultrasound findings, and anatomical variation. We fit and trained with a logistic lasso model for binary cure model and subsequent survival model. Feature importance on the model was determined with post-selection inference. Performance metrics included area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (AUROC), concordance, and leave-one-out cross validation.

RESULTS

A total of 543 patients were identified, with a median preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior diameter of 23 and 10 mm, respectively. 39 of 232 patients included in the survival model required re-intervention. The cure and survival models performed well with a leave-one-out cross validation AUROC and concordance of 0.86 and 0.78, respectively. Post-selective inference showed that larger anteroposterior diameter at the second post-op follow-up, and anatomical variation in the form of concurrent anomalies were significant model features predicting negative outcomes. The model can be used at https://sickkidsurology.shinyapps.io/PyeloplastyReOpRisk/ .

CONCLUSION

Our ML-based model performed well in predicting the risk of and time to re-intervention after pyeloplasty. The implementation of this ML-based approach is novel in pediatric urology and will likely help achieve personalized risk stratification for patients undergoing pyeloplasty. Further real-world validation is warranted.

Evaluation of the results of laser endopyelotomy with two different technique in ureteropelvic junction obstruction

INTRODUCTION

Failed pyeloplasty procedures are caused by large amounts of scarring, and peripelvic fibrosis. This finding has been associated with urinary extravasations to the operation, urosepsis or an excessive tissue reaction. The treatment options for secondary UPJO (Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction) are the same with the options for primary procedures: in cases of very poor renal function, various pyeloplasty forms (open and laparoscopic), and ureterocalicostomy or sometimes nephrectomy may be considered in severe renal function loss. Whereas, endoscopic treatment can be considered in elective cases.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 46 young patients who underwent endopyelotomy due to secondary ureteropelvic obstruction between January 2013 and September 2018 were included in the study. Patients underwent semirigid URS (Ureterorenoscopy) guided laser endopyelotomy until July 2015, and the patients had flexible URS guided laser endopyelotomy since July 2015.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was found as 17.7 ± 4.2 and 16.9 ± 5.7 years in the SURSLE (Semirigid Ureterorenoscopy Laser Endopyelotomy), and FURSLE (Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Laser Endopyelotomy) groups, respectively. Success of the procedure was confirmed in 20 (83%) patients in the SURSLE group, and 19 (86%) patients in the FURSLE group who had no obstructive symptoms based on USG, GFR and excretion curves on the renogram ordered in the 24th month. Four (16%) patients in the SURSLE group, and 3 (14%) patients in the FURSLE group were accepted as failed, their treatments were arranged for additional surgical procedures, and these patients were taken under the follow-up protocol.

DISCUSSION

This is one of the first studies comparing endopyelotomy with semirigid URS and flexible URS in patients with ureteropelvic stenosis. Long-term results with a large series of patients are not known, and our approach can be considered only as an individual method. There are different treatment options in UPJO. The use of fluoroscopy has advantages in endourologic operations. Therefore, lower radiation exposure can be a rational approach for protecting a person. Similarly, providing necessary protection also for physicians and operating room personnel is essential. In our study, shorter fluoroscopy time with SURSLE provided an advantage over FURSLE in terms of radiation exposure.

CONCLUSION

Of semirigid and flexible URS techniques that have no superiority over each other in terms of success, preferring semi-rigid URS guided laser endopyelotomy with lower ionizing radiation used, is more rational.

Modified Laparoscopic and Robotic Flap Pyeloplasty for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction with a Long Proximal Ureteral Stricture: The "Wishbone" Anastomosis and the "Ureteral Plate" Technique

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to present our modified flap pyeloplasty techniques for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with a long proximal ureteral stricture and compare outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2018 and January 2020, 21 patients underwent modified laparoscopic or robotic flap pyeloplasty for recurrent UPJO with a long proximal ureteral stricture. Our surgical modifications included the "wishbone" anastomosis and "ureteral plate" technique. Demographic, perioperative, and follow-up data were recorded and compared retrospectively between the groups. Success was defined as subjective pain alleviation and hydronephrosis improvement.

RESULTS

Thirteen modified laparoscopic flap pyeloplasty (mLFP) and 8 modified robotic flap pyeloplasty (mRFP) were performed successfully without conversion. mRFP tended to have shorter overall operative time (142.4 vs. 179.1 min, p = 0.122) and anastomosis time (43.1 vs. 61.0 min, p = 0.093) than mLFP. No difference was found in estimated blood loss (p = 0.723) and pararenal draining time (p = 0.175) between the groups. The mean postoperative hospital stay of mRFP was significantly shorter than that of mLFP (5.0 vs. 8.2 days, p = 0.015). No major complications occurred. During the mean follow-up of 17.9 months, the overall success rate was 90.5%, and there was no significant difference between 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified flap pyeloplasty could be considered a practical and effective treatment option with a high success rate for recurrent UPJO with a long proximal ureteral stricture, and the robotic procedures showed advantages of higher efficiency and faster recovery.

Surgical outcomes are equivalent after pure laparoscopic and robotic-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive (robotic and pure laparoscopic) pyeloplasty has been increasingly used for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). However, few large-scale studies have compared these two modalities directly.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center review of all patients who underwent pure laparoscopic (LP) or robotic pyeloplasty (RALP) between 2007 and 2018. Patients were excluded if the initial surgery at our institution was a redo pyeloplasty or if they lacked follow-up information. Outcomes of interest included operative time, length of stay, and complication rates, including rates of secondary procedures. We compared these outcomes between groups using Student's t test for continuous variables and a Chi-square for categorical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 282 patients were identified. Forty-eight were excluded based on study criteria; therefore, our total study cohort was 234 patients: 119 RALP and 115 LP cases. Overall mean postoperative follow-up time was 20.8 months, with no significant differences between groups. Mean operative time was shorter in the LP group when compared the RALP group (3 h 7 min vs. 3 h 41 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in length of stay (1.22 days vs 1.50 days, p = 0.095). Complications occurred in 52 patients (22.2% of overall cohort) with no difference in incidence between groups. Twenty-five patients (14 in the RALP group and 11 in the LP group) underwent unplanned secondary procedures; 19 of these patients (9 in the RALP group and 10 in the LP group) needed a procedure to address secondary obstruction.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated no significant differences between RALP and LP in regards to complication rates. Surgeons performing RALP and LP have the potential to offer the same level of care for the surgical management of UPJO, especially in countries where robotic technology may not be readily available.

Robotics in Pediatric Urology: Evolution and the Future

Almost 30 years have passed since the inception of minimally invasive surgery in urology and specifically in pediatric urology. Laparoscopy has now become an essential tool in the pediatric urologic armamentarium. The application of robot-assisted surgery in pediatrics has allowed for widespread utilization for common reconstructive procedures such as pyeloplasty and ureteral reimplantation. Understanding the implementation, technical considerations, and outcomes are critical for continued success and adoption. This has allowed for increased use in more complex urologic procedures such as redo pyeloplasty, dismembered ureteral reimplantation, catheterizable channel creation, and bladder augmentation.

Micropercutaneous endopyelotomy for the treatment of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children

INTRODUCTION

The management of recurrent pyeloureteral junction obstruction (PUJO) is controversial, as there is no suitable technique for its correction. Percutaneous endopyelotomy shows better results in recurrent PUJO compared to primary PUJO. Micro-percutaneous approaches reduce damage to renal parenchyma and facilitate access to renal pelvis.

OBJETIVE

To present our experience in the use of this minimally invasive technique for the treatment of recurrent PUJO.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was performed collecting data of patients with recurrent PUJO treated in our hospital using the percutaneous approach between July 2014 and January 2018. Micropercutaneous access was performed in all patients. In Valdivia position, a 5 or 6 mm high-pressure ballon is placed in the renal pelvis under cystoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. The 4.8 or 8 Fr microperc puncture needle is placed into the pelvicalyceal system. Endopyelotomy is performed with a laser fiber or monopolar hook on a high-pressure balloon. To improve the exposure of the cutting area, the high-pressure balloon is placed at the pyeloureteral junction. Double J stent is left for weeks.

RESULTS

The ages of the patients were 4, 8 and 18 months, and 2 and 4 years. All patients had previously undergone pyeloplasty due to pyeloureteral junction obstruction. Operative time was 50 ± 21 min. Hospital stay after surgery was 24 h and hematuria disappeared within the 24 postoperative hours.

DISCUSSION

The number of patients with recurrent PUJO is small, making it difficult to establish a standard surgical approach for failed pyeloplasty. Redo pyeloplasty is considered the gold standard by some authors but alternative methods, such as endourological techniques, may also have a role in the treatment of failed pyeloplasty. The percutaneous approach has shown very good results in this treatment and the miniaturization of percutaneous surgery has improved with the micropercutaneus access. We consider micropercutaneous approach helped with a high pressure balloon in the pyeloureteral junction is an alternative and minimally invasive technique that has shown good results in our small cases series. However, we must take into account the limitation of the study considering the low number of patients. We need prospective studies to support our results.

CONCLUSION

Micropercutaneous endopyelotomy is a fairly effective technique to treat recurrent UPJO after failed pyeloplasty in children. In our experience, it reduces kidney damage without increasing complications.

The impact of post-procedural ureteric stent duration on the outcome of retrograde endopyelotomy for management of failed open pyeloplasty in children: a preliminary report

Background: To evaluate the outcome of retrograde endopyelotomy as a minimally invasive option for management of failed open pyeloplasty in children and assess how the duration of post-procedural stenting may affect the endopyelotomy outcome.

Methods: A total of 15 patients with secondary UPJO (Ureteropelvic junction obstruction) underwent retrograde endopyelotomy. The procedure was done using low-energy monopolar electrocautery hook under direct vision of pediatric ureteroscope and control of fluoroscopy. Double J stent was placed after the operation in all cases. Stent was removed in another session, 8 weeks (Group A, n=7) vs. 12 weeks (Group B, n=8) after endopyelotomy. Patients in both Groups were followed one, six and twelve months after the stent removal, and the anteroposterior renal pelvis diameter (APD), renal cortical thickness (CT) and degree of hydronephrosis (HDN) were recorded using the repeated measure test. P-value less than 0.05 were significant. We analyzed the data using SPSS software, version 20.

Results: The median interquartile range (IQR) age at time of surgery for group A and B were 24 (62) months and 12 (50) months respectively. Median (IQR) times between previous pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy were 6 (6) months and 12 (8.5) months in groups A and B, respectively. The success rate of endopyelotomy after 12 months was 57.1% in group A and 87.5% in group B. The resolution of HDN was more prominent in the 12 week stenting group compared to the 8 week group during the 12 months follow-up period (p=0.030). The APD and CT in group B compared to group A was improved during follow-up period.

Conclusion: A higher one-year success rate of retrograde endopyelotomy in terms of improvements in the degree of HDN, APD and CT was observed when the double j stent was remained for 12-weeks rather than 8-weeks. This observation need to be validated in a large cohort study with a long term post procedural follow up.

Our experience on management of failed pediatric pyeloplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to assess the outcomes of salvage procedures after failed pediatric pyeloplasty. Recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction treatment is a difficult course. The salvage surgery is more challenging in the pediatric population. We aimed to assess the outcomes of salvage procedures after failed pediatric pyeloplasty to determine the most efficient surgical intervention.

METHODS

40 children with 41 renal units who have been treated for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after pyeloplasty were analyzed retrospectively. The outcomes of all initial and sequent interventions were assessed including redo pyeloplasty, endopyelotomy and balloon dilatation.

RESULTS

Children's mean age at initial intervention for failed pyeloplasty was 45.9 (± 46.4) months. Our mean follow-up time after the initial intervention was 46.9 (± 46.6) months. The success rate of our initial treatment methods was 48.7% (20/41). Although redo pyeloplasty was the most successful intervention (83.3%) than DJS placement (45.5%), endopyelotomy (50%) and balloon dilatation (30.8%), the statistical difference was not significant in the initial operations. The overall success rates of redo pyeloplasty, double-J stent placement, endopyelotomy and balloon dilatation were 78.9%, 46.1%, 38.8% and 29.4%, respectively (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Redo pyeloplasty provides the best improvement in recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. In selected patients, minimal invasive methods such as endopyelotomy and balloon dilatation offer alternative treatment.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty as management for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a comparison study with primary pyeloplasty

Background

To analyze the perioperative parameters and outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) and compare them with our series of RALP for primary UPJO. Secondary pyeloplasty can be a challenging procedure because of ureteral devascularization, fibrosis and dense stricture formation. Robotic approach could be adjunct to these repairs.

Methods

Between August 2015 to March 2019, 96 patients in our hospital underwent RALP, with 32 patients as secondary intervention for recurrent UPJO. We compared the perioperative parameters of RALP for both primary UPJO and recurrent UPJO. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, postoperative outcomes and complications from both groups were analyzed and compared.

Results

RALP was successfully performed for all cases in both groups. The median operating time was longer for secondary RALP than for primary RALP [125 (108.5–155) vs. 151 (120–190) minutes, P=0.004]. There were no conversions to open surgery or significant perioperative complications. No difference in blood loss, transfusion rate and perioperative complication rates was noted between the two groups. The success rates were 98.44% (63/64) and 96.88% (31/32) at a median follow up of 32 and 20 months (P=0.001) for the primary and secondary groups, respectively.

Conclusions

Secondary RALP is associated with significantly longer operative time as compared to primary RALP, especially during the exposure of the UPJO, however it is a safe surgical modality for recurrent UPJO with durable outcome. RALP should be an alternative treatment modality for recurrent UPJO whenever the facility and expert are available.

Multi-institutional Experience Comparing Outcomes of Adult Patients Undergoing Secondary Versus Primary Robotic Pyeloplasty

OBJECTIVE

To describe surgical techniques and peri-operative outcomes with secondary robotic pyeloplasty (RP), and compare them to those of primary RP.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our multi-institutional, collaborative of reconstructive robotic ureteral surgery (CORRUS) database for all consecutive patients who underwent RP between April 2012 and September 2019. Patients were grouped according to whether they underwent a primary or secondary pyeloplasty (performed for a recurrent stricture after previously failed pyeloplasty). Perioperative outcomes and surgical techniques were compared using nonparametric independent sample median tests and chi-square tests; P < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Of 158 patients, 28 (17.7%) and 130 (82.3%) underwent secondary and primary RP, respectively. Secondary RP, compared to primary RP, was associated with a higher median estimated blood loss (100.0 vs 50.0 milliliters, respectively; P < .01) and longer operative time (188.0 vs 136.0 minutes, respectively; P = .02). There was no difference in major (Clavien >2) complications (P = .29). At a median follow-up of 21.1 (IQR: 11.8-34.7) months, there was no difference in success between secondary and primary RP groups (85.7% vs 92.3%, respectively; P = .44). Buccal mucosa graft onlay ureteroplasty was performed more commonly (35.7% vs 0.0%, respectively, P < .01) and near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green was utilized more frequently (67.9% vs 40.8%, respectively; P < .01) for secondary vs primary repair.

CONCLUSION

Although performing secondary RP is technically challenging, it is a safe and effective method for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after a previously failed pyeloplasty. Buccal mucosa graft onlay ureteroplasty and utilization of near-infrared fluorescence with indocyanine green may be particularly useful in the re-operative setting.

Preoperative Topical Estrogen Treatment vs Placebo in 244 Children With Midshaft and Posterior Hypospadias

PURPOSE

Urethral fistula and dehiscence are common after hypospadias surgery. Preoperative androgens have been considered to reduce these complications although this consideration is not evidence-based. Dermatologists have reported the benefits of topical estrogens on skin healing. We investigated whether the preoperative use of topical promestriene could reduce healing complications in hypospadias surgery. Our primary objective was to demonstrate a reduction of healing complications with promestriene vs placebo. Impact on reoperations and other complications, clinical tolerance, bone growth, and biological systemic effects of the treatment were also considered.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial between 2011 and 2015 in 4 French centers. One-stage transverse preputial island flap urethroplasty (onlay urethroplasty) was selected for severe hypospadias. Promestriene or placebo was applied on the penis for 2 months prior to surgery. The primary outcome was the presence of postoperative urethral fistula or dehiscence in the first year postsurgery. For safety reasons, hormonal and anatomical screenings were performed.

RESULTS

Out of 241 patients who received surgery, 122 patients were randomized to receive placebo, and 119 patients received promestriene. The primary outcome was unavailable for 11 patients. Healing complications were assessed at 16.4% (19/116) in the placebo vs 14.9% (17/114) in the promestriene arm, and the odds ratio adjusted on center was 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.45-1.94), P = 0.86.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Although we observed an overall lower risk of complications compared to previous publications, postsurgery complications were not different between promestriene and placebo, because of a lack of power of the study or the inefficacy of promestriene.

Redo Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants and Children: Feasible and Effective

Purpose: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty among patients with failed previous pyeloplasty, specifically examining rates of success and complications. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients, who underwent redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty from 2006 to 2017. This included patients who underwent primary pyeloplasty at our institution and those referred for failures. Analysis included demographics, operative time, complications, length of hospital stay, complications, and success. Success was defined as improvement of symptoms and hydronephrosis and/or improvement in drainage demonstrated by diuretic renogram, especially in those with persistent hydronephrosis. Descriptive statistics are presented. Results: We identified 22 patients who underwent redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty. All had Anderson-Hynes technique except two cases in which ureterocalicostomy was performed. Median (IQR) follow-up was 29 (2-120) months, median time between primary pyeloplasty and redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty was 12 (7-49) months. The median operative time was 200 (50-250) min, and median length of hospital stay was 3 (2-10) days. The procedure was feasible in all cases without conversion. During follow-up, all but two patients demonstrated an improvement in the symptoms and the degree of hydronephrosis. Ninety-one percent of patients experienced success and no major complications were noted. Conclusions: Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty is feasible and effective with a high success rate and low complication rate.

Management of recurrent ureteral stricture: a retrospectively comparative study with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open approach

Background

Management of recurrent ureteral stricture is challenging. Consensus on the best surgical choice has not been demonstrated. In this study, we aim to report our experience in treating recurrent ureteral stricture and demonstrate whether robot-assisted procedure for redo ureteral surgery is as effective as open procedure while remaining less invasive.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed 41 patients (22 robot-assisted surgeries and 19 open surgeries) who underwent consecutive robot-assisted and open procedures for redo ureteral surgery from January 2014 to 2018 in our institution. Perioperative outcomes, including demographics, operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, pain scores, success rate and cost, were compared between two groups.

Results

There was no significant intergroup difference in terms of age, body mass index, gender composition and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores. A total of 31 patients underwent redo pyeloplasty and ten underwent redo uretero-ureterostomy. Compared with open group, robot-assisted group showed shorter operative time (124.55 min vs. 185.11 min, p < 0.0001), less estimated blood loss (100.00 mL vs. 182.60 mL, p = 0.008) and higher cost (61161.77¥ vs. 39470.79¥, p < 0.0001). Complication rate and pain scores were similar between two groups. Median follow-up periods were 30 and 48 months for robot-assisted and open group respectively. Success rate in the robot-assisted (85.71%) and the open group (82.35%) was not significantly different.

Conclusions

Robot-assisted surgery for recurrent stricture after previous ureteral reconstruction is as effective as open procedure and is associated with shorter operative time and less estimated blood loss.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?

INTRODUCTION

Open pyeloplasty (OP) has been the first-line treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) since it was first described by Anderson and Hynes. The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to treat UPJO in the pediatric population has increased in recent years, due to decreased morbidity and shorter recovery times. Recently, robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) has seen a steady expansion. Unlike laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP), RALP comes with a more manageable learning curve aided by specialized technological advantages such as high-resolution three-dimensional view, tremor filtration with motion scaling, and highly dexterous wrist-like instruments. With this review, we aim to highlight the trend toward robotic pyeloplasty over laparoscopy and current available evidence on outcomes.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases, and we critically reviewed the available literature on the use of laparoscopy and robotic technology in pediatric patients with UPJO.

RESULTS

Overall, we selected 19 original articles and 5 meta-analyses. The available literature showed that the robotic approach to the UPJO allowed for decreased operative times, shorter length of hospital stay, lower complication rates, with success rates comparable to LP. Conflicting results persist regarding robotic platform and equipment costs.

CONCLUSION

While laparoscopy requires advanced skills for complex reconstructive procedures, such as pyeloplasty, robot-assisted surgery offers the valuable potential of making MIS more accessible to these types of procedure. Robotic technology has contributed to shortening the learning curve by acting as a bridge between open and endoscopic approach. There is still a strong need for higher quality evidence in the form of prospective observational studies and clinical trials, as well as further cost-effectiveness analyses. As robotic surgical technology spreads, future systems will be developed, offering smaller and more flexible tools, allowing enhanced applications on pediatric patients.

Robotic correction of iatrogenic ureteral stricture: preliminary experience from a tertiary referral centre

Objective: Iatrogenic stenosis is a relatively common complication and it could happen after urological procedures in the entire course of the ureter. The aim of this study is to report the surgical outcomes of 36 consecutive patients (period April 2013-November 2018) submitted to robot-assisted correction of benign stricture with previous urological surgery in a tertiary referral center.Methods: Elective criteria were to have had a benign ureteral stricture development after at least one urological procedure. Patients were classified as failures in the event of post-operative ultrasound demonstrating persistent hydronephrosis with or without symptoms or persistent symptoms with renal scan evidence of obstruction or redo procedures.Results: Eighteen patients (50%) were treated for calculosis, seven (19.4%) patients were submitted to double J ureteral stenting and previous pyeloplasty was performed in 11 (30.5%) patients. Overall median operative time was 160 min (IQR = 120-180). Five (13.8%) complications with three (8.3%) surgical post-operative complications occurred. Length of stay was 6 (IQR = 5-7) days. At last follow-up, ranging between 7-60 months, the overall success rate was 86.1% (31/36): three of them (8.3%) were submitted to retrograde holmium laser endopyelotomy, while two (5.5%) underwent a redo robot-assisted correction.Conclusions: Robot-assisted correction procedures can be done safely with good perioperative outcomes and a high post-operative success rate in a tertiary referral center. Further randomized clinical trials are mandatory to confirm the safety of this procedure.

Balloon dilation for failed pyeloplasty in children?

Objective:

Pyeloplasty is considered the gold standard treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). However, the failure rate of pyeloplasty is as high as 10% and repeat pyeloplasty is more difficult. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of balloon dilatation for failed pyeloplasty in children.

Materials and Methods:

Between 2011 and 2017, 15 patients, aged 6 months to 14 years, were treated with balloon dilation for restenosis of UPJO after a failed pyeloplasty. Ultrasound and intravenous urography were used to evaluate the primary outcome. Success was defined as the relief of symptoms and improvement of hydronephrosis, which was identified by ultrasound at the last follow-up.

Results:

All patients successfully completed the operation, 13 patients by retrograde approach and 2 patients by antegrade approach. Thirteen patients were followed for a median of 15 (4 to 57) months and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. Resolution of the hydronephrosis was observed in 5 cases. The anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the pelvis decreased by an average of 12.4 ± 14.4mm. Eight patients needed another surgery. The average postoperative hospital stay was 1.78 ± 1.4 days. Two patients experienced fever after balloon dilation. No other complications were found.

Conclusions:

Balloon dilatation surgery is safe for children, but it is not recommended for failed pyeloplasty in that group of patients, owing to the low success rate.

Robotic Ureteral Reconstruction in the Pediatric Population

Robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) surgery is a safe, minimally invasive technique that has become more widely used in pediatric urology over recent decades. With several advantages over standard laparoscopy, robotic surgery is particularly well-suited to reconstructive surgery involving delicate structures like the ureter. A robotic approach provides excellent access to and visualization of the ureter at all levels. Common applications include upper ureteral reconstruction (e.g., pyeloplasty, ureteropelvic junction polypectomy, ureterocalicostomy, and high uretero-ureterostomy in duplex systems), mid-ureteral reconstruction (e.g., mid uretero-ureterostomy for stricture or polyp), and lower ureteral reconstruction (e.g., ureteral reimplantation and lower ureter-ureterostomy in duplex systems). Herein, we describe each of these robotic procedures in detail.

Endopyelotomy versus redo pyeoloplasty for management of failed pyeloplasty in children: A single center experience

PURPOSE

We compared endopyelotomy to redo pyeloplasty for the treatment of failed pyeloplasty in children to identify factors that may have an impact on outcome and favor one procedure over the other.

METHODS

Of 43 patients with recurrent UPJO, EP was performed in 27 and RP was performed in 16. Age, gender, side, presentation of secondary UPJO, hospital stay, complications and success rates were compared. Success was defined as radiographic relief of obstruction as determined by ultrasound or diuretic renography at latest follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean (Range) patient age was 7.2 years (range 6 months to 17 years) in EP (group 1) while 7.4 (range 6 months to 17 years) in RP (group 2). EP technique consisted of retrograde cold-knife in 17 patients, retrograde holmium laser in 8 and antegrade cold-knife in 2. RP was performed in 16 patients. All the patients with failed EP had a stricture greater than 15 mm. Mean length of the narrowed ureteral segment was 17.8 mm in the failed EP group vs 10 mm in the successful group (p < 0.001). Mean Hospital stay was 1 day for the EP group and 5 days for the RP group (p < 0.001). Mean follow-up was 17 months (range 12 to 43) after EP and 21 months (12 to 51) after RP. There was no statistical significance between both groups regarding the postoperative degree of hydronephrosis, parenchymal thickness, split renal functions and renal drainage. The overall success was (86%); the success was nonsignificantly higher in RP (93.8%) vs (81.5%) in EP.

CONCLUSION

In selected children, retrograde endopyelotomy is safe and may give comparable short-term outcomes as open redo pyeloplasty for correction of secondary UPJO after failed pyeloplasty. Narrowed ureteral segment greater than 15 mm and preoperative grade 4 hydronephrosis were factors significantly associated with a poor outcome after EP.

A LEVEL-OF-EVIDENCE RATING FOR CLASSIFYING STUDY QUALITY

LEVEL III Retrospective comparative study.

Quantifying the Additional Difficulty of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Re-Do Pyeloplasty: A Comparison of Primary and Re-Do Procedures

BACKGROUND

Re-do pyeloplasty after failed open or laparoscopic ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction correction can be a challenging procedure because of scar formation at the previous anastomosis site and decreased vascularity of the ureter. This study compared the perioperative parameters for pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) primary and re-do pyeloplasties with an emphasis on the intra-operative parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared the perioperative parameters of pediatric RAL procedures performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary care children's hospital for both primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) and recurrent UPJO after a previous open or laparoscopic procedure over 2013-2015. The operative time was subdivided as total operative time, console time, port placement time, dissection time to UPJ, and anastomosis time.

RESULTS

A total of 65 pediatric RAL pyeloplasty procedures for UPJO were performed (55 primary and 10 re-do pyeloplasties) during the study period. The console times were 43.3% longer for re-do pyeloplasties than for primary pyeloplasties (133.0 ± 30.7 versus 92.8 ± 24.0 minutes, respectively, P < .01). The re-do cases had longer operative times, especially for UPJ exposure (52.2 ± 21.0 versus 28.0 ± 14.0 minutes, P < .01). There were no conversions to open surgery or significant perioperative complications. There was no difference in hospital pain medication usage and hospital length of stay between the 2 groups. The treatment success rates were 98.2% (54/55) and 100% (10/10), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RAL re-do pyeloplasty is associated with significantly longer operative times as compared with primary pyeloplasties, especially during the exposure of the UPJ, but it is overall a safe and effective surgical modality for persistent/recurrent UPJO in children. As surgeons are increasingly asked for more accurate predictions of operative time lengths when scheduling cases, this information can be helpful for surgeons when scheduling these cases and with counseling families.

Modified tubularized incised plate urethroplasty reduces the risk of fistula and meatal stenosis for proximal hypospadias: a report of 63 cases

PURPOSE

To report the feasibility of modified tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty technique for proximal hypospadias in 63 cases.

METHODS

From January 2004 to March 2010, 63 patients underwent one-stage TIP urethroplasty (modified Snodgrass technique repair) using 2-3 of three covering layers (corpus spongiosum, dartos, and tunica vaginalis). The primary meatus was proximal penile, penoscrotal, scrotal, and perineal in 38, 13, 10, and 2 patients, respectively. All patients had chordee that was corrected with dorsal plication. Glanuloplasty was performed in all cases. Complications and cosmetic results were documented after 6-72 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 63 boys with proximal hypospadias underwent Snodgrass hypospadias repair at a mean age of 8.5 months (range 6-54). Mean operative time was 210 ± 35 min. Patients were followed up with 6-month intervals for up to 6 years postoperatively. After 6 years of follow-up, nine urethrocutaneous fistulae, four bleeding, four meatal stenoses, and one urethral stricture were reported. Cosmetic result was satisfactory according to parent's opinion and another surgeon. No residual chordee was observed in any cases (without artificial correction).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this preliminary report can be estimated as an alternative technique with acceptable complication and cosmetic results for proximal hypospadias correction.

Laparoscopic management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction following pyeloplasty: a single surgical team experience with 38 cases

Purpose

To describe and analyze our experience with Anderson-Hynes transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) in the treatment of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

Materials and methods

38 consecutive patients who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic redo-pyeloplasty between January 2007 and January 2015 at our department were included in the analysis. 36 patients were previously treated with dismembered pyeloplasty and 2 patients underwent a retrograde endopyelotomy. All patients were symptomatic and all patients had a T1/2>20 minutes at pre-operative DTPA (diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate) renal scan. All data were collected in a prospectively maintained database and retrospectively analyzed. Intraoperative and postoperative complications have been reported according to the Satava and the Clavien-Dindo system. Treatment success was evaluated by a 12 month-postoperative renal scan. Total success was defined as T1/2≤10 minutes while relative success was defined as T1/2between 10 to 20 minutes. Post-operative hydronephrosis and flank pain were also evaluated.

Results

Mean operating time was 103.16±30 minutes. The mean blood loss was 122.37±73.25mL. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.47±0.86 days. No intraoperative complications occurred. 6 out of 38 patients (15.8%) experienced postoperative complications. The success rate was 97.4% for flank pain and 97.4% for hydronephrosis. Post-operative renal scan showed radiological failure in one out of 38 (2.6%) patients, relative success in 2 out of 38 (5.3%) patients and total success in 35 out of 38 (92.1%) of patients.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic redo-pyeloplasty is a feasible procedure for the treatment of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), with a low rate of post-operative complications and a high success rate in high laparoscopic volume centers.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population: a review of technique, outcomes, complications, and special considerations in infants

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction is a common condition encountered by the pediatric urologist, and treated with pyeloplasty when indicated. Recent technological advancements and a shift across all surgical fields to embrace minimally invasive surgery have led to increased utilization of minimally invasive pyeloplasty. Conventional laparoscopy is a reasonable choice, but its use is limited by the technical challenges of precise suturing in a confined space and the associated considerable learning curve. Robotic technology has simplified the minimally invasive approach to pyeloplasty, offering enhanced visualization and improved dexterity with a fairly short learning curve. As utilization of robotic pyeloplasty continues to increase, we sought to critically assess the literature on this approach. We begin with a review of the technical aspects of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty including tips for surgical proficiency and patient safety. Outcomes and complications from the contemporary literature are reviewed, as well as special considerations in the pediatric population including infant pyeloplasty, cost concerns, training, and postoperative diversion/drainage.

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children is an operative challenge. Minimally invasive endourological treatment options for secondary UPJO have suboptimal success rates; hence, there is a re-emergence of interest about redo pyeloplasty. The present study presented experience with laparoscopic management of previously failed pyeloplasty compared with open redo pyeloplasty in children.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-four children with recurrent UPJO who underwent transperitoneal dismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty were studied. Operative, postoperative, and follow-up functional details were recorded and compared with those of open pyeloplasty (n = 15) carried out for recurrent UPJO by the same surgeon during the same study period.

RESULTS

Demographic data were comparable in the laparoscopic and open groups, except for a significantly lower GFR in the open group (24.8 vs 38.2 ml/min, P = 0.0001). Mean time to failure of the original repair was 20.2 months (23.6 months for redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty, 18.8 months for redo open). The success rate of laparoscopic redo pyeloplasty was 91.7 vs 100% in open redo pyeloplasty. Compared with redo open pyeloplasty, the mean operative time was longer (211.4 ± 32.2 vs 148.8 ± 16.6, P = 0.002), estimated blood loss was higher (102 vs 75 ml, P = 0.06), while hospital stay was shorter and pain score was lower in the laparoscopy group (P = 0.02) in the laparoscopic group. There were no intraoperative complications, while the postoperative complication rate was similar in the two groups (20.8 vs 20.0%).

DISCUSSION

Before the laparoscopic approach became a viable option, endopyelotomy was widely used for managing recurrent UPJO. However, the success rate of endopyelotomy for secondary UPJO was approximately 10-25% lower than for open pyeloplasty. Redo pyeloplasty had excellent results, with reported success rates of 77.8-100%. Laparoscopic redo pyeloplasty is becoming a viable alternative to open redo pyeloplasty in many centers with experience in minimally invasive techniques. The present study revealed that redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty appeared to have advantages over redo open surgery, in that it was associated with shorter hospital stay (4 vs 6 days, P = 0.046), reduced postoperative pain score (P = 0.02), and less need for postoperative analgesia (P = 0.001), still with comparable successful outcomes and patient safety. However, the procedure had a longer operative times and more blood loss.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a viable alternative to open pyeloplasty in children with recurrent UPJO, with shorter hospital stays and less postoperative pain. However, the procedure is technically demanding and should be attempted in high-volume centers by laparoscopists with considerable experience in laparoscopic reconstructive procedures.

Reoperative robotic pyeloplasty in children

INTRODUCTION

Reoperative pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) can be technically challenging and is associated with greater morbidity and lower success rates than an initial repair. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) previously has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective approach for management of recurrent UPJO; however, the length of follow-up has been limited. The objective of this study was to confirm the safety and efficacy of RALP for UPJO in children following failed previous pyeloplasty and provide clinical benchmarks for intermediate length follow-up in this patient population.

METHODS

An IRB approved retrospective chart review was performed for all patients undergoing reoperative RALP from June 2006 to December 2014. All cases were performed by surgeons from two institutions for persistent UPJO following failed initial pyeloplasty. Information including demographic information, radiographic studies, and operative interventions performed between the initial repair and reoperative surgery, reoperative RALP intraoperative data, postoperative clinical course and imaging studies, and subsequent interventions following reoperative RALP were extracted.

RESULTS

Twenty-three children underwent reoperative RALP. Eleven patients had right- and 12 left-sided repairs. Median age at reoperative RALP was 4.0 years and median interval between surgeries was 1.3 years. Indications for repeat repair included pain, infection, and/or radiographic evidence of worsening obstruction and/or deteriorating renal function. Mean operative time was 198 min from incision to port closure. Mean length of stay was 2.3 days. Six complications occurred in five patients within 30 days postoperatively, including ileus, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection. Median length of follow-up was 26 months (range 4-45 months) for all patients and 31 months (range 16-45 months) in 18 patients with >12 months of follow-up. More than 80% of patients presenting with flank pain prior to reoperative RALP had resolution of this symptom. To date, 78% of patients with >12 months of follow-up have not required further operative intervention. Excellent results have been achieved in 14 of 18 patients (78%) with sufficient postoperative follow-up in terms of length of follow-up (>12 months), symptom resolution, and/or improved imaging results.

CONCLUSIONS

RALP following previous pyeloplasty is technically feasible with acceptable operative times, lengths of stay, and complication rates. Reoperative RALP is our preferred modality for repair of recurrent UPJO with the vast majority of patients having successful outcomes based on imaging, resolution of symptoms, and the rare need for further intervention across an intermediate length follow-up period.

Reoperative Laparoscopic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair in Children: Safety and Efficacy of the Technique

PURPOSE

Failure after pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children may occur in up to 10% of cases. Therapeutic options include Double-J® stent placement, endoscopic treatment and reoperation. Laparoscopic and robotic reoperative modalities seem safe and efficacious, although pediatric series are limited in the literature. We report the largest known series of reoperative laparoscopic ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair in children and compare this approach to primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed all children undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty at a single institution from 2004 to 2015. Reoperative laparoscopic ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair was compared to primary pyeloplasty. Groups were analyzed regarding demographics, operative time, complications, length of hospital stay and success, defined by improvement of symptoms, ultrasound and renogram.

RESULTS

We identified 11 cases of reoperation (8 redo pyeloplasties and 3 ureterocalycostomies) and 71 primary pyeloplasties. Groups were not different in age, gender or weight. Median followup was 37 months. Median time between primary pyeloplasty and reoperation was 34 months. Median operative time was 205 minutes for the reoperative group and 200 for primary pyeloplasty (p = 0.98). Length of stay was longer in the reoperative group (p = 0.049), although no major complications were recorded in this group. All reoperative cases and 96% of primary pyeloplasty cases remained asymptomatic following surgery (p = 0.99). Postoperative improvement was similar for both groups on ultrasound (90% for reoperation vs 92% for primary pyeloplasty, p = 0.99) and renogram (80% vs 88%, p = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy seems to be safe and effective for management of failed pyeloplasty in children. Based on our data, reoperation is as safe and effective as primary pyeloplasty.

Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty

The laparoscopic approach to the pyeloplasty procedure has proven to be safe and effective in the pediatric population. Multiple studies have revealed outcomes comparable to the open approach. However, a major drawback to laparoscopy is the technical challenge of precise suturing in the small working space in children. The advantages of robotic surgery when compared to conventional laparoscopy have been well established and include motion scaling, enhanced magnification, 3-dimensional stereoscopic vision, and improved instrument dexterity. As a result, surgeons with limited laparoscopic experience are able to more readily acquire robotic surgical skills. Limitations of the robotic platform include its high costs for acquisition and maintenance, as well as the need for additional robotic surgical training. In this article, we review the current status of the robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty, including a brief history, comparative outcomes, cost considerations, and training.

National Trends in Secondary Procedures Following Pediatric Pyeloplasty

PURPOSE

Although reported success rates after pediatric pyeloplasty to correct ureteropelvic junction are high, failure may require intervention. We sought to characterize the incidence and timing of secondary procedures after pediatric pyeloplasty using a national employer based insurance database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the MarketScan® database we identified patients 0 to 18 years old who underwent pyeloplasty from 2007 to 2013 with greater than 3 months of postoperative enrollment. Secondary procedures following the index pyeloplasty were identified by CPT codes and classified as stent/drain, endoscopic, pyeloplasty, nephrectomy or transplant. The risk of undergoing a secondary procedure was ascertained using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified 1,976 patients with a mean ± SD followup of 23.9 ± 19.8 months. Overall 226 children (11.4%) had undergone at least 1 post-pyeloplasty procedure. The first procedure was done within 1 year in 87.2% of patients with a mean postoperative interval of 5.9 ± 11.1 months. Stents/drains, endoscopic procedures and pyeloplasties were noted in 116 (5.9%), 34 (1.7%) and 71 patients (3.1%), respectively. Length of stay was associated with undergoing a secondary procedure. Compared with 2 days or less the HR of 3 to 5 and 6 days or greater was 1.65 and 3.94 (p = 0.001 and <0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Following pediatric pyeloplasty 1 of 9 patients undergoes at least 1 secondary procedure with the majority performed within the first year. One of 11 patients undergoes intervention more extensive than placement of a single stent or drain, requiring management strategies that generally signify recurrent or persistent obstruction. Estimates of pyeloplasty success in this national data set are lower than in other published series.

Outcomes of Re-Intervention for Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Pyeloplasty in Children

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus for the management of failed laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric surgical patients, and only limited publications are available. We evaluated here the clinical outcomes of re-intervention for failed laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty in infants and children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of all children who had undergone laparoscopic transperitoneal dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction from 2002 to 2013 was performed. Patients' demographics, indications, operative details, and outcomes for primary operation as well as re-intervention were studied.

RESULTS

There were 42 patients with a median age of 20 months (range, 3-192 months) and a median body weight of 12 kg (range, 6-56 kg) who underwent a total of 46 laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasties during the study period. The median operative time and blood loss were 193 minutes (range, 115-480 minutes) and trace amount (range, trace amount to 400 mL), respectively. No conversion was reported. Ten cases (22%) required re-intervention. No statistically significant risk factor for failed pyeloplasty was identified. Indications for re-intervention included deterioration of differential renal function (n = 6), progressive hydronephrosis (n = 1), urinary ascites (n = 2), and urosepsis (n = 1). Median time of re-intervention was 6.5 ± 38 months postpyeloplasty. Re-intervention was categorized into the redo pyeloplasty group (n = 6) and the urinary diversion group (n = 4) (insertion of double-J ureteral stent or endopyelotomy) with success rates of 50% and 25%, respectively. Among the redo pyeloplasty group, 3 patients underwent redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty, and all of them had drainage restored with a median improvement in differential renal function of 11%. The mean follow-up duration was 77 ± 38 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty is safe and feasible in children. Redo pyeloplasty is a more favorable re-intervention compared with urinary diversion in our series. Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty has been shown to improve differential renal function.

Outcomes of endopyelotomy for pelviureteric junction obstruction in the paediatric population: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Dismembered pyeloplasty is the gold standard treatment for pelviureteric obstruction (PUJO) although endourological techniques are also employed. Outcomes and success rates for paediatric endopyelotomy are variably reported.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to systematically analyse published literature to give an overall success rate for endopyelotomy in children.

STUDY DESIGN

Medline and Embase databases were searched using relevant key terms to identify reports of paediatric endoplyelotomy. Literature reviews, case reports, series of <3 children and adult studies (age >20 years) were excluded. Primary and secondary procedures were considered separately. The procedure was considered successful if [a] the author reported success AND [b] there was no immediate conversion to open pyeloplasty OR a subsequent procedure to the PUJ 3 or more weeks after endopyelotomy.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen studies were assessed, 15 were included in the final review. Overall, 220 endopyelotomies were performed in 216 patients; 128 had primary PUJO, 92 underwent secondary endopyelotomy. Median success rate was 71% (range 46-100) in the primary group and 75% (25-100) in the secondary group. Previously undetected crossing vessels were found at subsequent open pyeloplasty in 12 failures (11 primary = 31% of failed primary endopyelotomies). Complications were reported in 14.8% of primary and 14.1% of secondary procedures.

DISCUSSION

This study is limited by the data given in the individual series: varied criteria used for patient selection and outcome as well as inconsistent pre and post operative imaging data precluded a meta-analysis. Designating procedures as failures if there were subsequent procedures to the PUJ lowered success rates from author-given figures for some studies. Complications rates after endopyelotomy are higher than those for open and minimally invasive pyeloplasty. Success rates for endoplyelotomy do not compare favourably with pyeloplasty and crossing vessels should be excluded before considering the procedure.

Laparoscopic management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction following pyeloplasty

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to analyze the operative, postoperative and functional outcome of laparoscopic management of previously failed pyeloplasty and to compare operative and postoperative outcome with laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent laparoscopic management for previously failed dismembered pyeloplasty were analyzed in this study. Detailed clinical and imaging evaluation was performed. Transperitoneal approach was followed to repair the recurrent UPJO. Operative, postoperative, and follow-up functional details were recorded. Operative and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic redo pyeloplasty were compared with that of laparoscopic primary pyeloplasty.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients were managed with laparoscopic approach for previously failed pyeloplasty. Primary surgical approach for dismembered pyeloplasty was open in 11, laparoscopy in four patients and robotic assisted in one patient. Fifteen were treated with redo pyeloplasty and one with ureterocalicostomy. Mean operative time was 191.25 ± 24.99 min, mean duration of hospital stay was 3.2 ± 0.45 days and mean follow-up duration was 29.9 ± 18.5 months with success rate of 93.3%. Operative time was significantly prolonged with redo pyeloplasty group compared with primary pyeloplasty group (191.25 ± 24.99 vs. 145 ± 22.89, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic redo pyeloplasty is a viable option with a satisfactory outcome and less morbidity.

Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?

OBJECTIVE

In this study we aim to demonstrate that robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) reoperative repair is safe and effective and even less technically demanding than open repair for recurrent ureteropelvic-junction obstruction (UPJO).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was conducted of all cases of failed open pyeloplasties who underwent RAL reoperative repair at our institution between January 2010 and December 2013. The general surgical procedure was the same we previously described for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Success was defined as: improvement in the degree of hydronephrosis at ultrasound, improvement of diuretic washout time at postoperative diuretic renogram (<15 min), improvement or at least stable differential renal function and absence of symptoms. These radiographic and symptomatic criteria of success were considered the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included complications and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2013 a total of 153 patients underwent open Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty. Of these 9 (6%) had recurrent UPJO. Four patients underwent open redo pyeloplasty. As a result, our study population comprised 5 children who underwent reoperative RALP repair. Patient characteristics and outcomes are summarized in the table below. Our success rate was 100%.

DISCUSSION

Due to the low failure rate of open dismembered pyeloplasty there is no consensus on the best surgical approach for recurrent obstruction. While endoscopic approaches have been favored in adults, children have shown better success rates with repeat pyeloplasty. Laparoscopic salvage pyeloplasty for failed open procedures has become more popular and has been shown to result in excellent outcomes while providing the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. To date, the literature regarding the use of RALP for failed open procedures in the pediatric population is scarce. Only 2 pediatric series of robotic reoperative pyeloplasty have been reported by Helmal et al. (9 patients) and Lindgren et al. (16 patients) with a success rate of 100 and 88%, respectively. Although this is one of the first published studies about robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed open pyeloplasty in pediatric patients, we acknowledge the limitations of our study due to the small number of patients, its retrospective nature and limited follow-up time.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of failed open pyeloplasty is as low as 5% and management remains controversial. As reported by other authors, we believe that crossing vessels play a particularly important role in secondary obstruction and adversely impact the outcome. Redo pyeloplasty, open or minimally invasive, is associated with high success rates (80-100%) and therefore considered the treatment of choice by the majority of authors nowadays. Additionally, RALP for secondary procedures has demonstrated to be safe and even less technically demanding when compared to the open approach, providing the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.

Delayed redo pyeloplasty fails to recover lost renal function after failed pyeloplasty: early sonographic changes that correlate with a loss of differential renal function

Purpose

To evaluate changes in differential renal function (DRF), as a functional outcome, in children who underwent redo pyeloplasty for management of failed pyeloplasty and to examine the factors that affect functional outcomes.

Materials and Methods

Between January 2002 and November 2010, a total of 18 patients who underwent redo pyeloplasty for persistent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed pyeloplasty were enrolled in this study. We assessed perioperative factors and evaluated changes in renal cortical thickness (RCT), renal function, and hydronephrosis by use of serial ultrasound and diuretic renography.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 44.83±28.86 months. After redo pyeloplasty, prevention of further functional deterioration was observed in only 12 of the 18 patients. After dividing the patients according to this observation, we discovered significant differences in both change in DRF (dDRF) and change in RCT (dRCT) (difference between before and after initial pyeloplasty) between the two groups (p<0.001). Additionally, we noted a significant positive correlation between dRCT and dDRF. All patients showed improvements in hydronephrosis grade and relief of symptoms compared with before redo pyeloplasty.

Conclusions

Redo pyeloplasty should be considered in cases of failed pyeloplasty to preserve renal function and obtain relief from symptoms. If patients show severe deterioration of DRF or a decrease in RCT after initial pyeloplasty, preservation of DRF in these patients after redo pyeloplasty could be difficult. Therefore, redo pyeloplasty should be performed before severe deterioration of DRF or decrease in RCT.

Management of secondary pelviureteric junction obstruction

Pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) of the kidney can lead to a number of different clinical manifestations, which often require surgical intervention. Although the success of pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy are good, there are still a number of patients who fail primary treatment and develop secondary PUJO. These treatment failures can be a challenging cohort to manage. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview on the surgical options available to the urologist for managing secondary PUJO as well as providing some guidance on assessing factors that will influence management decisions.

Endopyelotomy for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our 25-year experience

PURPOSE

We elucidate the role of endopyelotomy as a primary and secondary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 79 pediatric patients who underwent endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction between 1986 and 2011. Eleven patients were lost to followup and were excluded from analysis. Patient demographics, operative information, complications and success rates were reviewed for the remaining 68 patients. Treatment success was defined as the absence of symptom recurrence and improved radiographic features on ultrasound, computerized tomography, diuretic renogram or excretory urogram at most recent followup.

RESULTS

Primary endopyelotomy data were analyzed in 37 patients with a median age of 11.1 years. The success rate was 65% at a median followup of 34 months (range 1.5 to 242). Treatment failure occurred in 13 patients with a median time to failure of 8 months (range 1.5 to 131). There were 8 cases of failure during 12 months of surgery. Secondary endopyelotomy data were analyzed in 31 patients with a median age of 6.5 years. The success rate was 94% at a median followup of 61 months (range 1 to 204). Treatment failure occurred in 2 patients at 1 and 6 months. Approximately two-thirds of all procedures used an antegrade approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary endopyelotomy is significantly less successful than pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in pediatric patients. However, secondary endopyelotomy following failed pyeloplasty represents a viable alternative to redo pyeloplasty.

Long-term nephrostomy in an adult male spinal cord injury patient who had normal upper urinary tracts but developed bilateral hydronephrosis following penile sheath drainage: pyeloplasty and balloon dilatation of ureteropelvic junction proved futile: a case report

Introduction

The consequences of spinal cord injury upon urinary bladder are readily recognised by patients and health care professionals, since neuropathic bladder manifests itself as urinary incontinence, or retention of urine. But health care professionals and persons with spinal cord injury may not be conversant with neuropathic dysmotility affecting the ureter and renal pelvis. We report an adult male patient with spinal cord injury, who developed bilateral hydronephrosis after he started managing neuropathic bladder by penile sheath drainage.

Case presentation

A male patient, born in 1971, sustained spinal cord injury following a motorbike accident in September 1988. In November 1988, intravenous urography showed normal upper tracts. He was advised spontaneous voiding with 2-3 catheterisations a day. In February 1995, this patient developed fever, chills and vomiting. Blood urea: 23.7 mmol/L; creatinine: 334 umol/L. Ultrasound revealed marked hydronephrosis of right kidney and mild hydronephrosis of left kidney. Bilateral nephrostomy was performed in March 1995. Right pyeloplasty was performed in May 1998. In July 2005, this patient developed urine infection and was admitted to a local hospital with fever and rigors. He developed septicaemia and required ventilation. Ultrasound examination of abdomen revealed bilateral hydronephrosis and multiple stones in left kidney. Percutaneous nephrostomy was performed on both sides. Subsequently, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of left renal calculi was carried out. Right nephrostomy tube slipped out in January 2006; percutaneous nephrostomy was performed again. In June 2006, left ureteric antegrade stenting was performed and nephrostomy tube was removed. Currently, right kidney is drained by percutaneous nephrostomy and left kidney is drained by ureteric stent. This patient has indwelling urethral catheter.

Conclusion

It is possible that regular intermittent catheterisations along with anticholinergic medication right from the time of rehabilitation after this patient sustained paraplegia might have prevented the series of urological complications. Key components to successful management of external drainage of kidney in this patient are: [1] use of size 14 French pigtail catheter for long-term nephrostomy, [2] anchoring the catheter to skin to with Percufix catheter cuff to prevent accidental tug [3], replacing the nephrostomy dressing once a week by the same team in order to provide continuity of care, and [4] changing nephrostomy catheter every six months by a senior radiologist.