Changes in prostate specific antigen in hypogonadal men after 12 months of testosterone replacement therapy: support for the prostate saturation theory

Lower pretreatment serum testosterone level predicts poor prognosis in the patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to reveal the association between pretreatment serum testosterone levels and prognosis in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy.

METHODS

A total of 91 patients were included in this retrospective study. Clinical data were obtained through chart review. Multivariate cox proportional hazards analyses addressed the impact of variables on castration-resistant prostate cancer-free and overall survivals.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 41.7 months, 61 (67%) and 49 (54%) patients developed castration-resistant prostate cancer and died, respectively. The median castration-resistant prostate cancer-free and overall survivals were 15.5 and 59.9 months, respectively. The cutoff value for discriminating between low- and high-testosterone levels was determined as 450 ng/dl by calculating the receiver operating characteristic curve. Patients in the low-testosterone group (n = 37) had a significantly higher body mass index, worse comorbidities represented by the higher Charlson comorbidity index and higher serum lactate dehydrogenase levels, than those in the high-testosterone group (n = 54). Castration-resistant prostate cancer free and overall survivals were significantly shorter in the low-testosterone group than in the high-testosterone group (P = 0.021 and P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified testosterone level of <450 ng/dl as an independent factor predicting development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (hazard ratio 2.28, P = 0.007), along with high-volume disease and Gleason score 9-10. Similarly, testosterone level of <450 ng/dl was independently associated with shorter overall survival (hazard ratio 2.84, P = 0.006), along with higher Charlson comorbidity index, visceral metastasis and higher alkaline phosphatase level.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower baseline serum testosterone levels predict poor prognosis in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

The testis, eunuchs, and testosterone: a historical review over the ages and around the world

INTRODUCTION

Testosterone therapy for men with testosterone deficiency is widely used, yet remains controversial. The rich and fascinating history of the testicles, including human castration, provides a valuable perspective on this important topic.

OBJECTIVES

This study reviewed the history of testosterone from antiquity to the modern day.

METHODS

Primary sources consisted of books and relevant articles, augmented by a MEDLINE search using the key words "testis," "testicles," "castration," "eunuchs," "testosterone," and "testicular function."

RESULTS

An early scientific observation was that castration reduced sexual development and activity, originating with domestication of animals approximately 10 000 years ago. Human castration appears in ancient Egyptian mythology more than 4000 years ago, in Greek mythology from 8th century BCE, and in the Bible. The history of eunuchs in China spanned 2000 years, beginning with the Hsia dynasty (2205-1766 BCE). The concept that the testicles produced some factor responsible for male sexual development and behavior was thus known throughout the world since the beginning of recorded history. Testosterone was isolated and synthesized in 1935 and was soon available as a treatment. Multiple benefits of testosterone therapy were apparent by 1940. Recent large, controlled testosterone studies have conclusively demonstrated sexual and general health benefits, with a strong safety profile.

CONCLUSION

Testosterone has been a known substance for <1% of the historical timeline, yet knowledge that the testes were responsible for male sexual development and behavior has been known since the beginning of recorded history. Today, modern evidence has demonstrated the importance of normal levels of testosterone for general health as well as sexual function and desire. Yet, testosterone therapy remains controversial. We believe this historical review provides a helpful perspective on this age-old issue.

An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of testosterone replacement therapy on erectile function and prostate

Introduction

Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is a generally accepted method treating for aging-related late-onset hypogonadism (LOH). However, the efficacy and safety of TRT remain controversial. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness and security of TRT treating for LOH.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TRT for LOH were searched in the databases of Pubmed, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov and Cochrane from 1990 to 2023 and an updated meta-analysis was conducted.

Results

The results of 28 RCTs involving 3461 patients were included and scrutinized in this analysis. Among these, 11 RCTs were of long-term duration (≥12 months), while 18 RCTs were short-term studies (<12 months) comparing TRT with a placebo. TRT modalities comprised injection, oral administration, and transdermal administration. International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) (Weighted Mean difference (WMD) 3.26; 95%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.65-4.88; P<0.0001) was obviously improved in the TRT group. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (WMD 0.00; 95% CI -0.45-0.45; P=1.0), Prostate Volume (PV) (WMD 0.38; 95% CI -0.64-1.41; P=0.46), Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax) (WMD 1.86; 95% CI -0.98-4.69; P=0.20), Postvoid Residual Urine Volume (PVR) (WMD 3.20; 95% CI -5.87-12.28; P=0.49) and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) (WMD 0.08; 95% CI -0.00-0.17; P=0.06) were not significantly statistical between two groups.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis reveals that TRT could improve the IIEF score of hypogonadal men without detriment to the IPSS score, PV, Qmax, PVR and PSA regardless of the administration method or duration of treatment.The meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023413434).

The British Society for Sexual Medicine Guidelines on Male Adult Testosterone Deficiency, with Statements for Practice

Testosterone deficiency (TD) is an increasingly common problem with significant health implications, but its diagnosis and management can be challenging. A multi-disciplinary panel from BSSM reviewed the available literature on TD and provide evidence-based statements for clinical practice. Evidence was derived from Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane searches on hypogonadism, testosterone therapy (T Therapy) and cardiovascular safety from May 2017 to September 2022. This revealed 1,714 articles, including 52 clinical trials and 32 placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials. A total of twenty-five statements are provided, relating to five key areas: screening, diagnosis, initiating T Therapy, benefits and risks of T Therapy, and follow-up. Seven statements are supported by level 1 evidence, eight by level 2, five by level 3, and five by level 4. Recent studies have demonstrated that low levels of testosterone in men are associated with increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus, worse outcomes in chronic kidney disease and COVID 19 infection with increased all-cause mortality, along with significant quality of life implications. These guidelines should help practitioners to effectively diagnose and manage primary and age-related TD.

Testosterone therapy in prostate cancer: is it still a controversy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The benefits of testosterone therapy (TTh) in the hypogonadal male can be dramatic. Historically, TTh has been contraindicated in prostate cancer (PCa). Current evidence has redefined our understanding of the influence serum testosterone has on prostatic androgen activity. Increasing numbers of hypogonadal men with coexisting PCa emphasizes the importance of describing those who may safely receive TTh. This review aims to present literature that evaluates the efficacy and safety of TTh in men with coexisting PCa.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our study, a comprehensive review of published literature regarding TTh in men with a history of PCa, consisted of studies conducted from the 1940s to 2022. Our review discusses evidence in accordance with previous studies that TTh has a role in patients with localized PCa as it has not been reported to increase rates of recurrence or progression of PCa.

SUMMARY

The use of TTh in hypongonadal men with a localized PCa has been shown to have positive clinical outcomes without increasing the rate of disease progression or recurrence. Further research, in a randomized controlled setting, is warranted.

The Relationship Between PSA and Total Testosterone Levels in Men With Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) secretion is a testosterone (T) dependent process. Published data suggest that a low T level is an independent predictor of higher-grade prostate cancer (PC).

AIM

To evaluate the relationship between T and PSA in patients with PC.

METHODS

All men diagnosed with PC with a recorded pre-treatment total T level measurement were included in this analysis. We analyzed demographic, clinical, and pathological data. Patients were stratified according to pretreatment PSA levels: <2 ng/mL, 2-4 ng/mL, >4 ng/mL. Low T was defined as total T < 10.4 nmol/L (300 ng/dL), very low T < 6.9 nmol/L (200 ng/dL).

OUTCOMES

T levels by PSA groups according to the PC pathology.

RESULTS

In this retrospective study, mean patient age was 61 years among 646 men. The distribution by PSA group was: 8% (<2), 17% (2-4), and 76% (>4). The mean T level across the entire cohort was 13 nmol/L (374 ng/dL). Overall, 30% had a T level < 10.4 nmol/L (300 ng/dL). The mean total T level by PSA group was: <2 ng/mL, 7 nmol/L (206 ng/dL); 2-4 ng/mL, 13 nmol/L (362 ng/dL); >4 ng/mL, 14 nmol/L (393 ng/dL), P < .001. PSA <4 ng/mL was a significant predictor of low T in men with PC GS ≥8. PSA <2 ng/mL was a significant predictor of very low T independent of the PC pathology.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

These findings suggest that clinicians should consider measuring T levels when a patient diagnosed with PC GS ≥8 and PSA level <4 ng/mL, and for each patient with PSA level <2 ng/mL independent of the PC pathology.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

Our study has several strengths including (i) inclusion of a large population of men, (ii) use of a database which is audited and reviewed for accuracy annually, and (iii) use of an accurate T assay (LCMS). Nonetheless, there are limitations: (i) the subjects of the study are from a single institution, and (ii) we did not measure free T levels.

CONCLUSION

In men with PC with GS ≥8, PSA level <4 ng/mL predicts low T. PSA <2 ng/mL predicts very low T independent of the PC pathology. Flores JM, Bernie HL, Miranda E, et al. The Relationship Between PSA and Total Testosterone Levels in Men With Prostate Cancer. J Sex Med 2022;19:471-478.

How the rise of testosterone therapy in men was inspired by lizard research with David Crews

A chance encounter in 1975 with David Crews in Harvard Square led to 3 years of research in his lab, investigating the role of testosterone (T) in male sexual behavior of the lizard, Anolis carolinensis. In 1988 when I began my practice as a urologist and specialist in men's health, my research experience with lizards led me to offer testosterone therapy (TTh) to men suffering with symptoms of testosterone deficiency, despite the universal belief that TTh caused prostate cancer (PCa). My investigation of this topic over 30+ years has led to revolutionary changes in the diagnosis and treatment of men with testosterone deficiency and our understanding of the biology of testosterone and PCa. Today, it is routine for men successfully treated for PCa to receive TTh, a remarkable fact given that standard treatment for men with advanced PCa has been androgen deprivation for the last 80 years. Our research showed low T was not protective for PCa; TTh did not appear to worsen PCa for various cancer stages; and provided the theoretical framework for understanding why androgen deprivation shrinks PCa tumors, yet TTh appears to not cause PCa growth under most conditions. This is based on the Saturation Model, which recognizes there is a finite ability of androgens to stimulate PCa growth, which becomes maximal at low T concentrations. David Crews was an outstanding mentor-the lessons I learned from him inspired a lifetime of work, which in turn led to improved quality of life for millions of men.

A systematic review on the latest developments in testosterone therapy: Innovations, advances, and paradigm shifts

Objectives

To review the latest innovations and advances in testosterone treatments including their advantages and disadvantages and to address important issues in testosterone therapy (TTh).

Methods

This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched using specifically related key words. The identified studies were screened for inclusion criteria that included studies discussing one of the four objectives of the systematic review: 1) cut–off references, 2) prevention/remission of type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM), 3) duration of treatment, and 4) prostate, lower urinary tract symptoms, prostate health, or cancer. The search was limited to the past 15 years. Any studies were not written in English were excluded.

Results

The initial literature search retrieved 393 studies. After screening four studies were removed due to duplication, 360 studies were further excluded after reviewing the title, abstract or the whole manuscript due to different exclusion criteria or being not focussed on the objective. Finally, 29 studies were included in the review. One study discussed the cut–off value, four studies discussed the effect of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) on the control of T2DM, four studies on duration of TRT, and 20 studies discussed the effects of TRT on the prostate

Conclusions

Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefits of TTh in overtly hypogonadal men. There are several possible administration routes for testosterone treatment. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of the method of TRT will often be determined by patient preference or co-medication (no intramuscular injections in patients under coumarin or similar anticoagulants). Although new developments are promising, it seems that among the available treatments, only transdermal gel delivery and long-acting injectable testosterone undecanoate provide pharmacokinetic behaviour that gives a steady state level within a physiological range.

Trends in Testosterone Therapy use in Prostate Cancer Survivors in the United States

BACKGROUND

Physician prescribing patterns surrounding the use of testosterone therapy (TTh) in men with a history of prostate cancer (CaP) is not well described.

AIM

To characterize the demographics and usage patterns of testosterone therapy in men with a history of prostate cancer in the United States.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review using Optum's De-identified Clinformatics Data Mart database. Administrative diagnosis, procedural, pharmacy, and laboratory codes were used to identify male subjects 40 years and older with prostate cancer treated with surgery or radiation between 2003 and 2018 who went on to receive TTh. Demographic and clinical factors are identified. Temporal trends in TTh usage were reported.

OUTCOMES

The main outcomes were rates of testosterone prescriptions in men with treated prostate cancer and associated laboratory values such as Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) and testosterone levels before TTh.

RESULTS

126,374 men completed treatment for CaP during the study period (42,515 surgery, 75,186 radiation, 8,673 both). Of these, 3,074 men (2.4%) received testosterone after CaP treatment. Men who received testosterone were younger, more likely to have erectile dysfunction, depressive disorder, and lower pretreatment PSA values compared to men who did not receive. Median PSA levels before TTh initiation were 0 - 0.2 depending on CaP treatment modality and median total testosterone level was <300 ng/dL. TTh began an average of 1.5 years after radical prostatectomy and 2.6 years after radiation treatment. We observed an increase in TTh after CaP from the beginning of the study period until it peaked in 2013 at 4.9%. After 2013, rates decreased annually until a plateau of approximately 1.8% of men. Approximately a third of men did not have testosterone labs checked before initiation of TTh.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

These findings provide insight into trends in testosterone prescriptions in men after prostate cancer treatment and may aid in clinical decision-making, as well as areas for improvement in cancer survivorship care.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Strengths include the large sample size, length of data coverage, and real-world analysis of testosterone prescribing patterns across the United States. Limitations include the reliance on insurance claims data, the retrospective study design, and lack of additional relevant clinical variables that may impact decision making regarding TTh.

CONCLUSION

National trends in testosterone prescriptions for men with treated prostate cancer suggest that many men are treated with TTh after prostate cancer therapy with patterns of indications and monitoring consistent with the general population. Chen T, Li S, Eisenberg M. Trends in Testosterone Therapy use in Prostate Cancer Survivors in the United States. J Sex Med 2021;18:1346-1353.

[Practical recommendations for the management of testosterone deficiency]

OBJECTIVES

The Francophone Society of Sexual Medicine (SFMS) and the Andrology and Sexual Medicine Committee (CAMS) of the French Association of Urology (AFU) have brought together a panel of experts to develop French recommendations for the management of testosterone deficiency (TD).

METHODS

Systematic review of the literature between 01/2000 and 07/2019. Use of the method of recommendations for clinical practice (RPC) and the AGREE II grid.

RESULTS

TD is defined as the association of clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of TD with a decrease in testosterone levels or serum androgen activity. Diagnosis requires a T lower than the reference values in young men on 2 successive assays. Sexual disorders are often at the forefront, and concern the whole male sexual function (desire, arousal, pleasure and orgasm). The most evocative symptoms are: decrease in sexual desire, disappearance of nocturnal erections, fatigue, loss of muscle strength. Overweight, depressed mood, anxiety, irritability and malaise are also frequently found. TD is more common in cases of metabolic, cardiovascular, chronic, andrological diseases, and in cases of corticosteroid, opioid, antipsychotic, anticonvulsant, antiretroviral, or cancer treatment. Since SHBG is frequently abnormal, we recommend that free or bioavailable T is preferred over total T. The treatment of TD requires a prior clinical (DRE, breast examination) and biological (PSA, CBC) assessment. Contraindications to T treatment are: progressive prostate or breast cancer, severe heart failure or recent cardiovascular event, polycytemia, complicated BPH, paternity project. It is possible in cases of sleep apnea syndrome, psychiatric history, stable heart disease, prostate cancer under active surveillance and after one year of complete remission of a low or intermediate risk localized prostate cancer treated in a curative manner. It includes long-term testosterone supplementation and life-style counseling. Treatment is monitored at 3, 6, 12 months and annually thereafter. It is clinical (annual DRE) and biological (total T, PSA, CBC), the most frequent side effect being polyglobulia.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations should help improve the management of TD.

Oncological safety and functional outcomes of testosterone replacement therapy in symptomatic adult-onset hypogonadal prostate cancer patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) remains controversial in men with treated prostate cancer. We assessed its safety and functional impacts in patients after definitive surgical treatment with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 1303 patients who underwent RARP during the years 2006-2019. We identified men with symptoms of andropause and low serum testosterone who received TRT post-RARP; then we divided the cohort into two groups accordingly for comparison. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included functional outcomes. Predictors of BCR, including the effect of TRT on BCR, were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among the forty-seven men who received TRT, the mean age was 60.83 years with a median follow-up of 48 months. Three (6.4%) and 157 (12.56%) patients experienced BCR in TRT and non-TRT groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between both groups except for higher mean BMI in the TRT group (p = 0.03). In the multivariate analysis (MVA), higher pre-RARP prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (p = 0.043), higher International Society of Urological Pathology score (p < 0.001), seminal vesical invasion (p = 0.018) and positive surgical margin (p < 0.001) were predictors of BCR. However, TRT was not (p = 0.389). In addition, there was a significant change in the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (p = 0.022), and serum testosterone level (p < 0.001) before and 6 months after initiation of TRT.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that TRT, in well-selected, closely followed, symptomatic men post-RARP is an oncologically safe and functionally effective treatment in prostate cancer patients post-RARP.

Late-onset hypogonadism: Prostate safety

BACKGROUND

There have always been concerns regarding testosterone replacement therapy and prostate safety because of the central role of testosterone in prostate tissue. Even though there is a body of evidence supporting that the benefits of testosterone replacement therapy outbalance the risks of prostate disease, this matter is still debatable and represents a common concern among testosterone prescribers.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this article was to review the influence of testosterone on prostate pathophysiology and discuss the potential impact of testosterone replacement therapy on the most common prostate pathologies, including benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have performed an extensive PubMed review of the literature examining the effects of testosterone replacement therapy on the prostate and its most common affections, especially in terms of safety.

RESULTS

Testosterone replacement therapy has been shown to improve components of metabolic syndrome and decrease prostate inflammation, which is related to the worsening of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Studies evaluating the link between testosterone replacement therapy and benign prostatic hyperplasia/LUTS have mostly demonstrated no change in symptom scores and even some benefits. There are a significant number of studies demonstrating the safety of testosterone replacement therapy in individuals with late-onset hypogonadism and a history of prostate cancer. The most recently published guidelines have already acknowledged this fact and do not recommend against T treatment in this population, particularly in non-high-risk disease.

CONCLUSION

Testosterone replacement therapy could be considered for most men with late-onset hypogonadism regardless of their history of prostate disease. However, a discussion about the risks and benefits of testosterone replacement therapy is always advised, especially in men with prostate cancer. Appropriate monitoring is mandatory.

Prostate-Specific Antigen Within the Reference Range, Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis, and Cardiovascular Mortality

RATIONALE

Although PSA (prostate-specific antigen)-a tumor marker for prostate cancer-has been reported to be associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, studies on the association of PSA with subclinical and clinical CVD remain limited.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the association of total serum PSA within the reference range with coronary artery calcium (CAC) score and CVD mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A cross-sectional study was performed in 88 203 Korean men who underwent a health checkup exam including cardiac tomography estimation of CAC score. Logistic regression model was used to calculate odds ratios with 95% CIs for prevalent CAC. PSA levels were inversely associated with the presence of CAC. After adjusting for potential confounders, multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (95% CIs) for prevalent CAC comparing PSA quartiles 2, 3, and 4 to the first quartile were 0.96 (0.90-1.01), 0.88 (0.83-0.93), and 0.85 (0.80-0.90), respectively ( P for trend, <0.001). A cohort study was performed in 243 435 Korean men with a mean age of 39.3 years, PSA values of <4.0 ng/mL, and without known CVD or prostate disease who were followed up with for ≤14 years for CVD mortality (median, 7.3 years). CVD deaths were ascertained through linkage to national death records. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs for CVD mortality were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. During 1 829 070.1 person-years of follow-up, 336 CVD deaths were identified. After adjustment for potential confounders, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) for CVD mortality comparing PSA quartiles 2, 3, and 4 to the lowest quartile were 0.90 (0.66-1.22), 0.79 (0.58-1.08), and 0.69 (0.51-0.93), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum total PSA levels within the reference range showed an inverse association with subclinical atherosclerosis and CVD mortality in young and middle-aged Korean men, indicating a possible role of PSA as a predictive marker for subclinical and clinical CVD.

Safety of testosterone therapy in men with prostate cancer

Introduction: The use of testosterone therapy (TTh) in men with prostate cancer (PCa) is relatively new, and controversial, due to the longstanding maxim that TTh is contraindicated in men with PCa. Scientific advances have prompted a reevaluation of the potential role for TTh in men with PCa, particularly as TTh has been shown to provide important symptomatic and general health benefits to men with testosterone deficiency (TD), including many men with PCa who may expect to live 30-50 years after diagnosis. Areas covered: This review outlines the historical underpinnings of the historical belief that TTh 'fuels' PCa and the experimental and clinical studies that have radically altered this view, including description of the saturation model. The authors review studies of TTh in men with PCa following radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy, in men on active surveillance, and in men with advanced or metastatic PCa. Expert opinion: TTh provides important symptomatic and overall health benefits for men with PCa who have TD. Although more safety studies are needed, TTh is a reasonable therapeutic option for men with low-risk PCa after surgery or radiation. Data in men on active surveillance are limited, but initial reports are reassuring.

The Optimal Indication for Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Late Onset Hypogonadism

The use of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) for late-onset hypogonadism (LOH) is increasing every year; however, the literature shows that many men are using testosterone (T) without a clear indication. Previous studies have estimated that up to 25% of men who receive TRT do not have their T tested prior to initiation of the therapy. Given the growing concern and need for proper TRT, clinicians need evidence-based information that informs them on the optimal indication for TRT in LOH patients. The diagnosis of LOH requires the presence of characteristic signs and symptoms, in combination with decreased serum total testosterone (TT). Based on the recent guidelines by the International Society for the Study of Aging Male (ISSAM), the European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society of Endocrinology (ESE), the European Academy of Andrology (EAA), and the American Association of Urology (AUA), a TT of 250–350 ng/dL is the proper threshold value to define low T. The optimal indication for TRT in LOH is the presence of signs and symptoms of hypogonadism, and low T without contraindications for TRT.

The Role of Testosterone Therapy in the Setting of Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of testosterone in the development of prostate cancer and the safety of testosterone therapy (TTh) after prostate cancer treatment, or in the setting of active surveillance, remains controversial. There are many concerns about using TTh in men, particularly those with a history of prostate cancer, ranging from a possible increased risk of cardiovascular disease to cancer progression or recurrence. With many prostate cancer patients living longer, and hypogonadism having significant morbidity, much care must go into the decision to treat. Here, we review the literature investigating the effects of testosterone on the prostate as well as the efficacy and safety of exogenous testosterone in men with a history of prostate cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

The improvement in quality of life with TTh is well studied and understood, while the argument for significantly increased risk of cancer or other adverse effects is much less robust. Neither increased rates of prostate cancer, cancer recurrence, or cardiovascular risk have been well established. In men with high-risk prostate cancer, evidence in the setting of TTh is very limited, and TTh should be used with caution. The fears of TTh causing or worsening prostate cancer do not appear to be well supported by available data. Though more studies are needed to definitively determine the safety of TTh in men with prostate cancer, consideration should be given to treatment of hypogonadal men with a history of CaP.

Testosterone treatment and the risk of aggressive prostate cancer in men with low testosterone levels

Purpose

Testosterone treatment of men with low testosterone is common and, although relatively short-term, has raised concern regarding an increased risk of prostate cancer (CaP). We investigated the association between modest-duration testosterone treatment and incident aggressive CaP.

Materials and methods

Retrospective inception cohort study of male Veterans aged 40 to 89 years with a laboratory-defined low testosterone measurement from 2002 to 2011 and recent prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing; excluding those with recent testosterone treatment, prostate or breast cancer, high PSA or prior prostate biopsy. Histologically-confirmed incident aggressive prostate cancer or any prostate cancer were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively.

Results

Of the 147,593 men included, 58,617 were treated with testosterone. 313 aggressive CaPs were diagnosed, 190 among untreated men (incidence rate (IR) 0.57 per 1000 person years, 95% CI 0.49–0.65) and 123 among treated men (IR 0.58 per 1000 person years; 95% CI 0.48–0.69). After adjusting for age, race, hospitalization during year prior to cohort entry, geography, BMI, medical comorbidities, repeated testosterone and PSA testing, testosterone treatment was not associated with incident aggressive CaP (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.70–1.13) or any CaP (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.81–1.01). No association between cumulative testosterone dose or formulation and CaP was observed.

Conclusions

Among men with low testosterone levels and normal PSA, testosterone treatment was not associated with an increased risk of aggressive or any CaP. The clinical risks and benefits of testosterone treatment can only be fully addressed by large, longer-term randomized controlled trials.

Testosterone Therapy on Active Surveillance and Following Definitive Treatment for Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Previously considered an absolute contraindication, the use of testosterone therapy in men with prostate cancer has undergone an important paradigm shift. Recent data has changed the way we approach the treatment of testosterone deficiency in men with prostate cancer. In the current review, we summarize and analyze the literature surrounding effects of testosterone therapy on patients being treated in an active surveillance protocol as well as following definitive treatment for prostate cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

The conventional notion that defined the relationship between increasing testosterone and prostate cancer growth was based on limited studies and anecdotal case reports. Contemporary evidence suggests testosterone therapy in men with testosterone deficiency does not increase prostate cancer risk or the chances of more aggressive disease at prostate cancer diagnosis. Although the studies are limited, men who received testosterone therapy for localized disease did not have higher rates of recurrences or worse clinical outcomes. Current review of the literature has not identified adverse progression events for patients receiving testosterone therapy while on active surveillance/watchful waiting or definitive therapies. The importance of negative effects of testosterone deficiency on health and health-related quality of life measures has pushed urologists to re-evaluate the role testosterone plays in prostate cancer. This led to a paradigm shift that testosterone therapy might in fact be a viable option for a select group of men with testosterone deficiency and a concurrent diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Risk of Testosterone Flare in the Era of the Saturation Model: One More Historical Myth

CONTEXT

When luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists were introduced in the 1980s, it was universally believed that the initial transient rise in serum testosterone (T), termed T flare, caused rapid prostate cancer (PCa) growth and led to disease progression, complications, and death. It became routine to offer antiandrogens (AAs) to prevent these risks. However, over the last decade, it has become recognized that androgens have a finite ability to stimulate PCa growth (the saturation model), providing a theoretical challenge to the risks of T flare.

OBJECTIVE

To review evidence for the risks associated with T flare from a modern perspective, specifically prostate-specific antigen (PSA) flare, disease progression, and spinal cord compression.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An Ovid Medline database search was conducted to identify articles related to "testosterone flare", "disease flare", and "PSA flare" associated with LHRH agonists. The literature review included papers published from May 1, 1980 through May 1, 2016. Key search terms included, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and antiandrogens.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Initial administration of LHRH agonists uniformly results in peak increases in serum T by 40-100% on days 2-3, returning to baseline by days 7-8, after which T declines to castrate levels by approximately 2-3 wk. Of six LHRH agonist studies reporting PSA during the period of T flare, five showed no significant rise in PSA despite the presence of advanced disease with mean baseline PSA as high as ≥500ng/ml. Evidence for disease flare was limited to one report of greater bone pain with LHRH agonists alone versus LHRH agonists with AAs. Three other RCTs reported no disease flare. Rates of spinal cord compression were no greater for LHRH agonists alone compared with castration or estrogen treatment. We identified no studies of men treated with LHRH agonists versus placebo/no treatment to assess the effects of LHRH agonists compared with the natural history of advanced PCa.

CONCLUSIONS

Although T flare has been considered risky for 30 yr, a modern review of the evidence collected primarily in the 1980s and 1990s fails to support this view. Specifically, T flare does not appear to be associated with significantly increased PSA, disease progression, or adverse events, even in men with widely metastatic disease. These results are consistent with the saturation model, first introduced in 2006. There seems little value in adding AA to LHRH agonists, except possibly for men with extensive vertebral metastases and serum T concentrations well below the saturation point of approximately 250ng/dl (8.7nmol/l).

PATIENT SUMMARY

A review of the literature reveals no evidence for increased risks associated with testosterone flare from the initiation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists. This appears to be an unsupported belief from an earlier era when our understanding of testosterone's relationship to prostate cancer was less sophisticated. Except in rare instances, there appears to be no need to use an androgen blocker when beginning treatment with LHRH agonists.

Testosterone therapy and prostate cancer

The use of exogenous testosterone to treat hypogonadism in the men with a history of prostate cancer (CaP) remains controversial due to fears of cancer recurrence or progression. Due to the detrimental impact of hypogonadism on patient quality of life, recent work has examined the safety of testosterone therapy (TTh) in men with a history of CaP. In this review, we evaluate the literature with regards to the safety of TTh in men with a history of CaP. TTh results in improvements in quality of life with little evidence of biochemical recurrence or progression in men with a history of CaP, or de novo cancer in unaffected men. An insufficient amount of evidence is currently available to truly demonstrate the safe use of TTh in men with low risk CaP. In men with high-risk cancer, more limited data suggest that TTh may be safe, but these findings remain inconclusive. Despite the historic avoidance of TTh in men with a history of CaP, the existing body of evidence largely supports the safe and effective use of testosterone in these men, although additional study is needed before unequivocal safety can be demonstrated.

Testosterone Therapy Among Prostate Cancer Survivors

INTRODUCTION

The use of testosterone in men with a history of prostate cancer remains controversial in light of established findings linking androgens to prostate cancer growth. However, hypogonadism significantly affects quality of life and has negative sequelae, and the risks and benefits of testosterone therapy might be worthwhile to consider in all men, even those with a history of high-risk prostate cancer.

AIM

To discuss the effects of testosterone on the prostate and the use of testosterone therapy in hypogonadal men with a history of prostate cancer.

METHODS

Review of the literature examining the effects of testosterone on the prostate and the efficacy and safety of exogenous testosterone in men with a history of prostate cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Summary of effects of exogenous and endogenous testosterone on prostate tissue in vitro and in vivo, with a focus on effects in men with a history of prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Testosterone therapy ameliorates the symptoms of hypogonadism, decreases the risk for its negative sequelae, and can significantly improve quality of life. Recent studies do not support an increased risk for de novo prostate cancer, progression of the disease, or biochemical recurrence in hypogonadal men with a history of non-high-risk prostate cancer treated with testosterone therapy. Evidence supporting the use of testosterone in the setting of high-risk prostate cancer is less clear.

CONCLUSION

Despite the historical reluctance toward the use of testosterone therapy in men with a history of prostate cancer, modern evidence suggests that testosterone replacement is a safe and effective treatment option for hypogonadal men with non-high-risk prostate cancer. Additional work to definitively demonstrate the efficacy and safety of testosterone therapy in men with prostate cancer is needed, and persistent vigilance and surveillance of treated men remains necessary.

Testosterone Therapy in Patients with Treated and Untreated Prostate Cancer: Impact on Oncologic Outcomes

PURPOSE

Testosterone deficiency and prostate cancer have an increasing prevalence with age. However, because of the relationship between prostate cancer and androgen receptor activation, testosterone therapy among patients with known prostate cancer has been approached with caution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified a cohort of 82 hypogonadal men with prostate cancer who were treated with testosterone therapy. They included 50 men treated with radiation therapy, 22 treated with radical prostatectomy, 8 on active surveillance, 1 treated with cryotherapy and 1 who underwent high intensity focused ultrasound. We monitored prostate specific antigen, testosterone, hemoglobin, biochemical recurrence and prostate specific antigen velocity.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 75.5 years and median followup was 41 months. We found an increase in testosterone (p <0.001) and prostate specific antigen (p = 0.001) in the entire cohort. Prostate specific antigen increased in patients on active surveillance. However, no patients were upgraded to higher Gleason score on subsequent biopsies and none have yet gone on to definitive treatment. We did not note any biochemical recurrence among patients treated with radical prostatectomy but 3 (6%) treated with radiation therapy experienced biochemical recurrence. It is unclear whether these cases were related to testosterone therapy or reflected the natural biology of the disease. We calculated mean prostate specific antigen velocity as 0.001, 0.12 and 1.1 μg/l per year in the radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy and active surveillance groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of randomized, placebo controlled trials our study supports the hypothesis that testosterone therapy may be oncologically safe in hypogonadal men after definitive treatment or in those on active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Effects of long-term androgen replacement therapy on the physical and mental statuses of aging males with late-onset hypogonadism: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in Japan (EARTH Study)

Androgen replacement therapy (ART) efficacy on late-onset hypogonadism (LOH) has been widely investigated in Western countries; however, it remains controversial whether ART can improve health and prolong active lifestyles. We prospectively assessed long-term ART effects on the physical and mental statuses of aging men with LOH in Japan. The primary endpoint was health-related quality of life assessed by questionnaires. Secondary endpoints included glycemic control, lipid parameters, blood pressure, waist circumference, body composition, muscular strength, International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) scores, and serum prostate-specific antigen levels. Of the 1637 eligible volunteers, 334 patients > 40 years with LOH were randomly assigned to either the ART (n = 169) or control groups (n = 165). Fifty-two weeks after the initial treatment, ART significantly affected the role physical subdomain of the short form-36 health survey (SF-36) scale (P = 0.0318). ART was also associated with significant decreases in waist circumstance (P = 0.002) and serum triglyceride (TG) (P = 0.013) and with significant increases in whole-body and leg muscle mass volumes (P = 0.071 and 0.0108, respectively), serum hemoglobin (P < 0.001), IPSS voiding subscore (P = 0.0418), and the second question on IIEF-5 (P = 0.0049). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of severe adverse events. In conclusion, in patients with LOH, long-term ART exerted beneficial effects on Role Physical subdomain of the SF-36 scale, serum TG, waist circumstance, muscle mass volume, voiding subscore of IPSS, and the second question of IIEF-5. We hope our study will contribute to the future development of this area.

Testosterone Therapy in Men With Prostate Cancer

CONTEXT

The use of testosterone therapy in men with prostate cancer was previously contraindicated, although recent data challenge this axiom. Over the past 2 decades, there has been a dramatic paradigm shift in beliefs, attitude, and treatment of testosterone deficiency in men with prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and analyze current literature regarding the effect of testosterone replacement in men with prostate cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a Medline search to identify all publications related to testosterone therapy in both treated and untreated prostate cancer.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The historical notion that increasing testosterone was responsible for prostate cancer growth was based on elegant yet limited studies from the 1940s and anecdotal case reports. Current evidence reveals that high endogenous androgen levels do not increase the risk of a prostate cancer diagnosis. Similarly, testosterone therapy in men with testosterone deficiency does not appear to increase prostate cancer risk or the likelihood of a more aggressive disease at prostate cancer diagnosis. Androgen receptor saturation (the saturation model) appears to account for this phenomenon. Men who received testosterone therapy after treatment for localized prostate cancer do not appear to suffer higher rates of recurrence or worse outcomes; although studies to date are limited. Early reports of men on active surveillance/watchful waiting treated with testosterone have not identified adverse progression events.

CONCLUSIONS

An improved understanding of the negative effects of testosterone deficiency on health and health-related quality of life-and the ability of testosterone therapy to mitigate these effects-has triggered a re-evaluation of the role testosterone plays in prostate cancer. An important paradigm shift has occurred within the field, in which testosterone therapy may now be regarded as a viable option for selected men with prostate cancer suffering from testosterone deficiency.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this article, we review and summarize the existing literature surrounding the use of testosterone therapy in men with prostate cancer. Historically, testosterone was contraindicated in men with a history of prostate cancer. We show that this contraindication is unfounded and, with careful monitoring, its use is safe in that regard.

Efficacy and safety of testosterone replacement therapy in men with hypogonadism: A meta-analysis study of placebo-controlled trials

The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of testosterone replacement therapy in men with hypogonadism. A search was conducted for appropriate randomized controlled trials and the data from 16 trials were pooled. The intended primary outcome of the present study was to determine the efficacy and safety of testosterone replacement therapy. The current data demonstrated that scores for Aging Male Symptoms (AMS) were significantly reduced following testosterone replacement therapy, with a mean decrease in AMS score of 1.52 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72 to 2.32; P=0.0002]. Testosterone replacement therapy increased lean body mass [mean difference (MD), 1.22; 95% CI, 0.33 to 2.11; P=0.007], reduced fat mass in a non-significantly manner (MD, −0.85; 95% CI, −1.74 to 0.04; P=0.06) and significantly reduced total cholesterol (MD, −0.16; 95% CI, −0.29 to −0.03; P=0.01). No significant differences were identified in body weight (MD, 0.09; 95% CI, −1.13 to 1.31; P=0.89), body mass index (MD, 0.10; 95% CI, −0.62 to 0.82; P=0.78) or bone mineral density (MD, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.03 to 0.02; P=0.60). Average prostate volume increased (MD, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.6 to 2.56; P=0.002) following testosterone replacement therapy, but the levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (MD, 0.10; 95% CI, −0.03 to 0.22; P=0.14) and the International Prostate Symptom Scores (MD, 0.01; 95% CI, −0.37 to 0.39; P=0.96) did not change. In conclusion, testosterone replacement therapy improves quality of life, increases lean body mass, significantly decreases total cholesterol, and is well-tolerated and safe for men with hypogonadism who are exhibiting PSA levels of <4 ng/ml.

Controversies and Advances With Testosterone Therapy: A 40-Year Perspective

Testosterone therapy (TTh) has become highly controversial. There are important health consequences of testosterone deficiency, and meaningful benefits with treatment. There is level 1 evidence that TTh improves sexual function and desire, body composition, and bone density. Concerns regarding cardiovascular risk were based on two deeply flawed retrospective studies and are contradicted by dozens of studies showing cardiovascular benefits of TTh or higher endogenous testosterone, including placebo-controlled studies in men with known heart disease (angina, heart failure). Prostate cancer should no longer be considered a risk of TTh. Testosterone is neither scourge nor panacea--it is just good medicine.

Testosterone Replacement Therapy and Prostate Cancer Incidence

While early studies demonstrated a positive association between testosterone and prostate cancer, evidence on the nature of the relationship has evolved with time and newer data. Studies examining links between baseline testosterone levels as well as testosterone therapy and incident prostate cancer, reveal a more complex relationship. Moreover, investigators have reported their initial experiences with supplementing testosterone in men with a history of both treated and untreated prostate cancer.

Testosterone replacement therapy and the risk of prostate cancer

Understanding the role of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in the development and progression of prostate cancer is an important concept in treating patients with symptoms of hypogonadism. This article revealed a small number of mostly retrospective, observational studies describing the use of TRT in the general population, in men with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), in men with a history of treated prostate cancer, and in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. The current literature does not report a statistically significant increase in the development or progression of prostate cancer in men receiving testosterone replacement for symptomatic hypogonadism, and the prostate saturation theory provides a model explaining the basis for these results. The use of TRT in men with a history of prostate cancer is considered experimental, but future results from randomized controlled trials could lead to a change in our current treatment approach.

The practical management of testosterone deficiency in men

Despite increased global interest in testosterone deficiency in men and its treatment with testosterone therapy, practical aspects of care remain confusing to many practitioners. Testosterone deficiency can result from testicular dysfunction (primary hypogonadism) or hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction (secondary hypogonadism), and be congenital or acquired. Sexual and nonsexual symptoms of testosterone deficiency can negatively affect quality of life and cause considerable general health concerns. Investigation of testosterone deficiency should be undertaken in men with symptoms of reduced libido, erectile dysfunction, depression, fatigue, poor concentration, and poor memory. Total and free testosterone are the most frequently used tests and evaluating serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone aids determination of primary versus secondary testosterone deficiency. Multiple formulations of testosterone therapy are available, but symptomatic benefits might not manifest for several weeks to many months; long-acting formulations are convenient and improve compliance. Concerns regarding cardiovascular and prostate cancer risks are not supported by current evidence, monitoring during therapy is mandatory. On balance, testosterone therapy can be considered a safe and effective treatment for testosterone deficiency.

Testosterone Therapy after Radiation Therapy for Low, Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Limited literature exists regarding the safety of testosterone therapy in men treated for prostate cancer. We present multi-institutional data on testosterone therapy in hypogonadal men with prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of hypogonadal men treated with testosterone therapy after radiation therapy for prostate cancer at 4 institutions. Serum testosterone, free testosterone, estradiol, sex hormone-binding globulin, prostate specific antigen, prostate specific antigen velocity and prostate biopsy findings were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 98 men were treated with radiation therapy. Median age was 70.0 years (range 63.0 to 74.3) at initiation of testosterone therapy. Median baseline testosterone was 209 ng/dl (range 152 to 263) and median baseline prostate specific antigen was 0.08 ng/ml (range 0.00 to 0.33). In the cohort the tumor Gleason score was 5 in 3 men (3.1%), 6 in 44 (44.9%), 7 in 28 (28.6%), 8 in 7 (7.1%) and 9 in 4 (4.1%). Median followup was 40.8 months (range 1.5 to 147). Serum testosterone increased to a median of 420 ng/dl (range 231 to 711) during followup (p <0.001). Overall a nonsignificant increase in mean prostate specific antigen was observed from 0.08 ng/ml at baseline to 0.09 ng/ml (p = 0.05). Among patients at high risk prostate specific antigen increased from 0.10 to 0.36 ng/ml (p = 0.018). Six men (6.1%) met criteria for biochemical recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Testosterone therapy in men following radiation therapy for prostate cancer was associated with a minor increase in serum prostate specific antigen and a low rate of biochemical recurrence.

Testosterone therapy in men with prostate cancer: literature review, clinical experience, and recommendations

For several decades any diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) has been considered an absolute contraindication to the use of testosterone (T) therapy in men. Yet this prohibition against T therapy has undergone recent re-examination with refinement of our understanding of the biology of androgens and PCa, and increased appreciation of the benefits of T therapy. A reassuringly low rate of negative outcomes has been reported with T therapy after radical prostatectomy (RP), radiation treatments, and in men on active surveillance. Although the number of these published reports are few and the total number of treated men is low, these experiences do provide a basis for consideration of T therapy in selected men with PCa. For clinicians considering offering this treatment, we recommend first selecting patients with low grade cancers and undetectable prostate-specific antigen following RP. Further research is required to define the safety of T therapy in men with PCa. However, many patients symptomatic from T deficiency are willing to accept the potential risk of PCa progression or recurrence in return for the opportunity to live a fuller and happier life with T therapy.

Testosterone deficiency and replacement: Myths and realities

Testosterone deficiency, or hypogonadism, is common and may have deleterious effects on men, including decreased overall well-being, reduced sexual function and bone loss. Despite data demonstrating strong links between testosterone deficiency and significant comorbid conditions (including type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome as well as the health benefits of testosterone-replacement therapy [TRT]), some physicians are still hesitant to initiate these therapies. Their reluctance is based on a number of prevailing myths associating TRT with adverse prostate health and recent concerns highlighting the possibility of increased cardiovascular risk.

Testosterone therapy and mortality risk

INTRODUCTION

Recent data suggests and increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in men on testosterone therapy (TT). To date there are no long term, prospective studies to determine safety. In such cases, retrospective observational studies can be helpful. We examined our patient database to determine if TT altered a man’s risk of all cause mortality.

METHODS

We queried our hormone database for all men with a serum testosterone level and then examined charts to determine testosterone status. In all, 509 men had charts available for review. We linked our patient records to the National Death Index to determine morality.

RESULTS

Of the 509 men who met inclusion criteria, 284 were on testosterone therapy and 225 did not use testosterone. Age (mean 54 years) and follow up time (mean 10 years) were similar for both groups. In all, 19 men died—10 (4.4%) of the men not on TT and 9 (3.2%) of the men on TT. After adjusting for age and year of evaluation, there was no significant difference in the risk of death based on TT (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.39 – 2.57, p=1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be no change in mortality risk overall for men utilizing long-term testosterone therapy.

The safety of testosterone supplementation therapy in prostate cancer

Patients with prostate cancer can present with hypogonadism and experience health and quality-of-life declines related to low testosterone levels. Despite generations of urological dogma suggesting that testosterone supplementation therapy (TST) for hypogonadism causes prostate-cancer progression, a review of the contemporary literature provides evidence to the contrary. The prostate saturation model suggests that the androgen receptor (AR) is saturated at serum testosterone levels of 150-200 ng/dl, and that additional serum testosterone above this level has limited, if any, effects within the prostate. Indeed, studies in the modern era of PSA assessments indicate that TST does not affect prostate size, intraprostatic testosterone levels, or prostate-cancer progression, provided the baseline serum testosterone level is greater than this AR saturation point. However, the body of data on this subject comes from a small number of cases, and TST should only be administered to patients with prostate cancer after thorough discussions of the risks and benefits, with subsequent careful monitoring.

12-month observation of testosterone replacement effectiveness in a general population of men

BACKGROUND

Testosterone decline becomes more prevalent as men age and symptomatic testosterone deficiency is associated with potentially serious comorbidities. Despite limitations, registries can provide an opportunity to accumulate data regarding disease management in a typical patient population, including diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Testim Registry in the United States (TRiUS) was a prospective, 12-month, observational cohort registry of men prescribed Testim® (1% testosterone gel; Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) for the first time; patients previously on other forms of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) were eligible to participate in the study as well. The registry recorded total testosterone (TT) and free testosterone (FT) levels, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), sexual function, mood/depression, and cardiometabolic and anthropometric criteria before and after TRT. Changes over time were analyzed by analysis of variance, and linear regression and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were used to examine relationships between variables.

RESULTS

At baseline, 849 patients from 72 sites were enrolled, with 743 of 849 started on 5 g gel/day (50 mg testosterone/day) and 106 of 849 started on 10 g gel/day (100 mg testosterone/day). Mean TT and FT levels increased significantly after 3 months of TRT (TT level, 16.8 ± 9.87 nmol/L [485 ± 284 ng/dL], P < 0.001; FT level, 286.3 ± 224.9 pmol/L [82.5 ± 64.8 pg/mL], P < 0.001) and were maintained at eugonadal levels. Mean PSA levels increased significantly (P = 0.004) from 1.12 ± 1.11 μg/L (1.12 ± 1.11 ng/mL) at baseline to 1.26 ± 1.22 μg/L (1.26 ± 1.22 ng/mL) after 12 months of TRT, although changes were well within guidelines (< 1.4 μg/L/year increase). Significant improvements were seen in sexual function and mood/depression at 3 months and in metabolic parameters at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Testosterone deficiency symptoms improved with TRT use in men; sexual function and mood/depression improvements were seen before metabolic improvements. Prostate-specific antigen levels increased, although increases were within guideline-determined safety limits.

Testosterone replacement therapy and prostate health

There is an emerging evolution in the understanding of the relationship between the prostate and testosterone. It has long been generally believed that with testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), increasing serum testosterone levels led to prostatic growth and worsening of voiding dysfunction and associated complications. A new theory, the Saturation Model of Testosterone and its effect on the Prostate has gained attention. This theory suggests that the prostate's response to increasing levels of serum testosterone reaches a limit beyond which there is minimal effect. This model predicts that testosterone replacement therapy occurs above this saturation point, and replacing testosterone to eugonadal levels should not worsen prostate related benign disease. We evaluated the recent published data, with an emphasis on clinical studies done within the last 3 years, for the effects of testosterone supplementation on benign prostatic disease.

Benefits and Consequences of Testosterone Replacement Therapy: A Review

Late onset hypogonadism (LOH) is an issue of increasing concern. Studies have shown the importance of testosterone in the maintenance of homeostasis, especially with respect to bone health, sexual function, diabetes, cardiovascular risk, mental health and cognition. Much of the dysfunction in hypogonadism can be reversed or improved with testosterone replacement therapy (TRT). Physicians worry about the possible consequences of TRT, especially regarding the prostate. By reviewing the literature, we have found there are significant benefits to TRT, and fears of adverse effects on the prostate are largely unfounded, though there is a great need for larger studies with longer periods of follow-up, especially to evaluate adverse events.

Influence of opioid consumption on serum prostate-specific antigen levels in men without clinical evidence of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of opioid consumption on the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level.

METHODS

From April 2009 to December 2011, 56 opioid users and 82 age-matched controls participated in the present study. The exclusion criteria were prostate cancer or other malignancies, serum PSA level ≥ 4 ng/dL, abnormal digital rectal examination findings, previous prostate surgery, pelvic radiotherapy, bladder stone, urinary tract infection, recent prostatic manipulation, and a history of taking drugs that alter the serum PSA level. The prostate volume and PSA, serum testosterone, and luteinizing and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were measured in the eligible participants and compared between the opioid users and control subjects. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the institutional review board approved the study.

RESULTS

The serum PSA level was significantly lower in opioid users compared with that in the control subjects (0.82 ± 0.77 vs 1.95 ± 1.00, P < .001). The testosterone level was also lower in the opioid users (339.08 ± 142.49 vs 396.71 ± 133.64, P = .008). The difference between the PSA levels remained significant when a comparison was performed between the eugonadal opioid users and eugonadal control subjects. Moreover, the effect of opioid consumption on the PSA level persisted on multivariate analysis, controlling for serum testosterone level.

CONCLUSION

Opium consumption was associated with significant decline in the serum PSA level and warrants adjustment in the PSA cutpoints at which biopsy is recommended. Opioid-induced hypogonadism does not seem to account for the PSA decline, and additional studies are required to determine the involved mechanisms.

Testosterone replacement therapy among elderly males: the Testim Registry in the US (TRiUS)

Background:

Testosterone levels naturally decline with age in men, often resulting in testosterone deficiency (hypogonadism). However, few studies have examined hypogonadal characteristics and treatment in older (≥65 years) men.

Objective:

To compare data at baseline and after 12 months of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in hypogonadal men ≥65 vs <65 years old. Data for participants 65–74 vs ≥75 years old were also compared.

Methods:

Data were from TRiUS (Testim Registry in the United States), which enrolled 849 hypogonadal men treated with Testim^® 1% (50–100 mg testosterone gel/day) for the first time. Anthropometric, laboratory, and clinical measures were taken at baseline and 12 months, including primary outcomes of total testosterone (TT), free testosterone (FT), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Comparisons of parameters were made using Fisher’s exact test or analysis of variance. Nonparametric Spearman’s ρ and first-order partial correlation coefficients adjusted for the effect of age were used to examine bivariate correlations among parameters.

Results:

Of the registry participants at baseline with available age information, 16% (133/845) were ≥65 years old. They were similar to men <65 years old in the duration of hypogonad-ism prior to enrollment (∼1 year), TT and FT levels at baseline, TT and FT levels at 12-month follow-up, and in reported compliance with treatment. Older patients were more likely to receive lower doses of TRT. PSA levels did not statistically differ between groups after 12 months of TRT (2.18 ± 2.18 ng/mL for ≥65 vs 1.14 ± 0.84 ng/mL for <65 years old, P = 0.1). Baseline values for the >75-year-old subcohort were not significantly different from subcohorts aged 65–74 years and <65 years.

Conclusion:

Hypogonadal men ≥65 years old showed significant benefit from TRT over 12 months, similar to that found for hypogonadal men <65 years old. TRT was well tolerated in older patients, successfully increased testosterone level regardless of age, and did not significantly increase PSA levels in older men.