1
|
Boynton D, Noyes SL, Murali A, Peabody H, Krumm A, Singh K, Lane BR. Simplified cardiovascular index may be the best comorbidity index for clinical use in prediction of mortality for renal cancer patients. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:72.e1-72.e8. [PMID: 38242826 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Understanding the relationship between comorbidities and life expectancy is important in cancer patients who carry risks of cancer and noncancer-related mortality. Comorbidity indices (CI) are tools to provide an objective measure of competing risks of death. We sought to determine which CI might be best incorporated into clinical practice for patients with suspected renal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS 1572 patients diagnosed with renal masses (stage I-IV) between 1998 and 2016 were analyzed for this study. Patient data were gathered from a community-based health center. Comorbidities were evaluated individually, and with 1 of 4 CI: Charlson (CCI), updated CCI (uCCI), age-adjusted CCI (aCCI), and simplified cardiovascular index (CVI). Cox-proportional hazard analysis of all-cause mortality was performed using the four CI, adjusting for the 4 CI, adjusting for age, gender, race, tumor size, and tumor stage. RESULTS Univariable analyses revealed the four CI were significant predictors of mortality (P < 0.05), as were age, gender, tumor size, and stage. Comorbid conditions at diagnosis included hypertension (47.8%), diabetes mellitus (47.2%), coronary artery disease (41.1%), chronic kidney disease (31.8%), peripheral vascular disease (8.0%), congestive heart failure (5.7%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (5.7%), and cerebrovascular disease (2.0%). When analyzing the 4 CI in multivariable survival analyses accounting for factors available at diagnosis, and analyses incorporating pathologic and recurrence data, only CVI score and uCCI remained statistically significant (P < 0.05). Limitations of this work are the retrospective nature of data collection and data from a single institution, limiting the generalizability. CONCLUSION Increasing comorbidity, age, tumor size, and cM stage are predictors of ACM for suspected renal cancer patients. CVI appears to provide comparable information to various iterations of CCI (uCCI, aCCI) while being the simplest to use. Utilization of CVI may assist clinicians and patients when considering between interventional and noninterventional approaches for suspected renal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Boynton
- Department of Surgery, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI
| | | | - Adharsh Murali
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Henry Peabody
- Division of Urology, Corewell Health West, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - Andrew Krumm
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Karandeep Singh
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Brian R Lane
- Department of Surgery, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI; Division of Urology, Corewell Health West, Grand Rapids, MI.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Satturwar S, Quiroga-Garza GM, Xing J, Khader SN. Utility of cytopathologic diagnosis of adult solid renal lesions: An academic Institution's 10-year experience. Diagn Cytopathol 2023; 51:596-604. [PMID: 37347206 DOI: 10.1002/dc.25179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fine needle aspiration (FNA) and/or needle core biopsy (NCB) are increasingly used for managing patients with renal lesions, especially small renal masses (SRMs). One of the treatment options for SMRs is active surveillance. Hence, accurate diagnosis of renal lesions is critical for treatment planning. The aim of this study is to investigate the utility of FNA and/or NCB in the diagnosis of adult renal lesions at our institute. MATERIALS AND METHODS Laboratory information system was queried over a period of 10 years (2011-2020) to identify cases of FNA and/or NCB with touch preparation (TP) of adult renal masses. Patient demographics, cytopathologic diagnoses, ancillary tests and follow-up surgical resection data were reviewed and correlated. RESULTS A total 138 cases from 138 patients (male = 80, female = 58) were identified. Sixty-one (44.20%) cases had FNA and NCB, 48 (34.78%) had NCB only and 29 (21.01%) had FNA only. 118 (85.50%) cases had definitive diagnoses and 13 (9.42%) had indeterminant diagnoses and seven cases were non-diagnostic (5.07%). Most common benign and malignant diagnoses were oncocytoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). 41/138 (29.71%) cases had follow-up resection. There were no false positive or false negative cases. Subtyping was feasible in majority cases with only 3/138 (2.17%) misclassified cases. CONCLUSIONS Majority of renal masses (85.50%) had definitive cytology diagnoses. Only three had misclassification. FNA and/or NCB are useful methods in diagnosing and subclassifying adult renal masses and showed high accuracy (91.89%) when compared to surgical resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati Satturwar
- Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Juan Xing
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Samer N Khader
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang L, Feng W, Lin W, Chen J, Peng S, Du X, Li X, Liu T, Ye Y. Enhanced and unenhanced: Radiomics models for discriminating between benign and malignant cystic renal masses on CT images: A multi-center study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0292110. [PMID: 37768941 PMCID: PMC10538730 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Machine learning algorithms used to classify cystic renal masses (CRMs) nave not been applied to unenhanced CT images, and their diagnostic accuracy had not been compared against radiologists. METHOD This retrospective study aimed to develop radiomics models that discriminate between benign and malignant CRMs in a triple phase computed tomography (CT) protocol and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the radiomics approach with experienced radiologists. Predictive models were established using a training set and validation set of unenhanced and enhanced (arterial phase [AP] and venous phase [VP]) CT images of benign and malignant CRMs. The diagnostic capabilities of the models and experienced radiologists were compared using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS On unenhanced, AP and VP CT images in the validation set, the AUC, specificity, sensitivity and accuracy for discriminating between benign and malignant CRMs were 90.0 (95%CI: 81-98%), 90.0%, 90.5% and 90.2%; 93.0% (95%CI: 86-99%), 86.7%, 95.2% and 88.3%; and 95.0% (95%CI: 90%-100%), 93.3%, 90.5% and 92.1%, respectively, for the radiomics models. Diagnostic accuracy of the radiomics models differed significantly on unenhanced images in the training set vs. each radiologist (p = 0.001 and 0.003) but not in the validation set (p = 0.230 and 0.590); differed significantly on AP images in the validation set vs. each radiologist (p = 0.007 and 0.007) but not in the training set (p = 0.663 and 0.663); and there were no differences on VP images in the training or validation sets vs. each radiologist (training set: p = 0.453 and 0.051, validation set: p = 0.236 and 0.786). CONCLUSIONS Radiomics models may have clinical utility for discriminating between benign and malignant CRMs on unenhanced and enhanced CT images. The performance of the radiomics model on unenhanced CT images was similar to experienced radiologists, implying it has potential as a screening and diagnostic tool for CRMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesheng Huang
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China
| | - Wenhui Feng
- Department of Radiology, Zhuhai People’s Hospital, Zhuhai, China
| | - Wenxiang Lin
- Department of Radiology, Zhuhai People’s Hospital, Zhuhai, China
| | - Jun Chen
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China
| | - Se Peng
- Department of Laboratory, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China
| | - Xiaohua Du
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China
| | - Xiaodan Li
- Department of Gynaecology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China
| | - Tianzhu Liu
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China
| | - Yongsong Ye
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ayoub CH, Abou Chawareb E, Kasti AE, Alhalabi E, El-Asmar JM, Abou Mrad A, El Hajj A. The 5-item frailty index predicts 30-day morbidity and mortality in radical nephrectomy patients: A propensity matched analysis. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:329.e1-329.e7. [PMID: 37120371 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the ability of the 5-item frailty index (5-IFi) score to predict 30-day morbidity and mortality post-radical nephrectomy (RN). METHODS ACS-NSQIP database was used to select patients who underwent RN from 2011 to 2020. 5-IFi score was calculated by assigning a point for each of the following comorbidities: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or pneumonia, congestive heart failure, dependent functional status, hypertension, and diabetes. Patients were divided into 3 frailty groups 0, 1, and ≥2. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, prolonged length of stay, and prolonged operative time were compared between different groups; mortality and morbidity using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CVD). Multivariable logistic regression models and propensity score matching were performed as a sensitivity analysis to control for possible confounders. RESULTS Cohort consisted of 36,682 patients whereby 5-IFi class 0, 1, and ≥2 included 11,564 (31.5%), 16,571 (45.2%), and 8,547 (25.3%) patients respectively. A multivariable analysis and propensity score matching revealed that patients with 5-IFi classes 1 and ≥ 2 were more likely to have a prolonged length of stay (OR = 1.11, 1.3, respectively) and to mortality (OR = 1.85 for frailty class ≥2); in addition to CVD class 1 & 2 (OR = 1.51, OR = 1.13, respectively), and CVD ≥ 4 (OR = 1.41, 1.86, respectively) as compared to 5-IFi class 0 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The 5-IFi score was found to be an independent predictor of prolonged length of stay, morbidity, and mortality after RN. This tool can play a major role in preoperative risk assessment and patient counseling based on individualized risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Habib Ayoub
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Elia Abou Chawareb
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Abdallah El Kasti
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Eliane Alhalabi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Jose M El-Asmar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Anthony Abou Mrad
- American University of Beirut Medical School, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Albert El Hajj
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon..
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hori S, Tanaka N, Iida K, Nakai Y, Miyake M, Anai S, Torimoto K, Fujimoto K. Impact of Radical Nephrectomy and Partial Nephrectomy on Actual Estimated Overall Survival Compared to Life Expectancy in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma. Res Rep Urol 2021; 13:155-165. [PMID: 33791249 PMCID: PMC8005365 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s299801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Reports suggest that partial nephrectomy provides no significant benefit in terms of cancer-specific and overall survival (OS) compared to radical nephrectomy. Here, we focused on survival in terms of life expectancy and investigated the significance of partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. Patients and Methods Our retrospective study included 937 patients (median age 63 years) with localized RCC who underwent partial nephrectomy or radical nephrectomy. Various predictive factors were explored, and the association between actual OS and life expectancy was analyzed. Results Performance status (PS) ≥1 and tumor size ≥40 mm were identified as independent poor prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival. Age ≥60, male sex, PS ≥1, C-reactive protein elevation, pT1b stage, and radical nephrectomy were identified as independent poor prognostic factors for OS. OS and life expectancy did not differ in the partial nephrectomy group (P=0.11). OS was significantly shorter than life expectancy in the radical nephrectomy group (P<0.0001). In PS0 or pT1a patients, there was a significant difference between actual OS and life expectancy in the radical nephrectomy group (P<0.0001), but not in the partial nephrectomy group (P=0.15). In patients with a life expectancy ≥10 years, PS0, and pTa, OS and life expectancy differed in the radical nephrectomy group, but not in the partial nephrectomy group. Conclusion Partial nephrectomy can improve actual OS, and notably, PS and tumor size are crucial factors that determine the choice of surgical procedure. Further research is needed to establish appropriate treatment strategies and criteria for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunta Hori
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Nobumichi Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Kota Iida
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Yasushi Nakai
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Satoshi Anai
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Torimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Campi R, Sessa F, Corti F, Carrion DM, Mari A, Amparore D, Mir MC, Fiori C, Papalia R, Kutikov A, Volpe A, Capitanio U, Pierorazio PM, Scarpa RM, Porpiglia F, Minervini A, Serni S, Esperto F. Triggers for delayed intervention in patients with small renal masses undergoing active surveillance: a systematic review. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2021; 72:389-407. [PMID: 32734748 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.20.03870-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with small renal masses (SRM) can be exposed to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. As such, active surveillance (AS) is recommended by all Guidelines for selected patients. However, it remains underutilized. One key reason is the lack of consensus on the factors prompting delayed intervention (DI). Herein we provide an updated overview of the triggers for DI in patients with SRMs initially undergoing AS. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of the English-language literature was performed according to the PRISMA statement recommendations using the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science databases. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 10 prospective studies including 1870 patients were included. Median patient age ranged between 64 and 75 years, while median tumor size between 1.7 cm to 2.3 cm. The proportion of cystic SRMs ranged from 0% to 30%. Baseline renal tumor biopsy was performed in 7-45.2% of patients. Among these, malignant histology was found in 28.5%-83.3% of cases. Overall, the median growth rate of SRMs ranged between 0.10 and 0.27 cm/year. The proportion of patients undergoing DI ranged between 7% and 44%, after a median AS period of 12-27 months. The most commonly performed type of DI was surgery. Of resected SRMs, 0% to 30% were benign. The actual triggers for DI were either tumor-related (renal mass growth, stage progression, development of local complications/symptoms) or patient-related (patient preference, improved medical conditions, or qualification for other surgical procedures). At a median follow-up of 21.7 - 57-6 months, the proportion of patients experiencing metastatic disease, cancer-specific and other-cause mortality was 0-3.1%, 0-4% and 0-45.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The available evidence shows that both tumor-related and patient-related factors are ultimate triggers for DI in patients with SRMs undergoing AS. However, the level of evidence is still low and further research is needed to individualize AS strategies according to both tumor biology and patient-related characteristics and values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Campi
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy - .,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy - .,European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Arnhem, the Netherlands -
| | - Francesco Sessa
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Corti
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Diego M Carrion
- European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Arnhem, the Netherlands.,Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Maria C Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Rocco Papalia
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alessandro Volpe
- Department of Urology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Phillip M Pierorazio
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Roberto M Scarpa
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Esperto
- European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Arnhem, the Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lohia S, Gupta P, Curry M, Morris LGT, Roman BR. Life Expectancy and Treatment Patterns in Elderly Patients With Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis. Endocr Pract 2020; 27:228-235. [PMID: 33779556 DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2020.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Guidelines endorse active surveillance for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), but this is not commonly utilized. Those with limited life expectancy due to age and comorbidity may be best suited for active surveillance given their higher likelihood of other-cause mortality compared to disease-specific mortality. METHODS Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-Medicare was queried for patients >65 years with T1, N0, M0 PTC who received surgery. We evaluated the overall survival, disease-specific survival (DSS), and survival based on tumor size and extent of surgery (hemi- vs total thyroidectomy). We created a competing risk model to identify the cumulative incidence of other-cause mortality to define patient groups with life expectancies of less than 10 and 15 years. RESULTS A total of 3280 patients were included. The 20-year overall survival and DSS were 38.2% and 98.5%, respectively. DSS was comparable between patients based on tumor size and surgery. The cancer cohort had better survival compared to matched controls (P < .001). Life expectancy was less than 15 years for any patient aged >80 years regardless of Charlson comorbidity score (CCS ≥ 0) and any patient aged >70 years with CCS ≥ 1. Life expectancy was less than 10 years for any patient a >80 years with CCS ≥ 1 and aged >70 years with CCS ≥ 3. CONCLUSION Older patients with comorbidities have limited life expectancies but excellent DSS from low-risk PTC. Incorporating life expectancy into management decisions and guidelines would likely promote selection of less aggressive management for populations that are most suited for this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivangi Lohia
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York
| | - Piyush Gupta
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York
| | - Michael Curry
- Health Outcomes Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York
| | - Luc G T Morris
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York
| | - Benjamin R Roman
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Is partial nephrectomy safe and effective in the setting of frail comorbid patients affected by renal cell carcinoma? Insights from the RECORD 2 multicentre prospective study. Urol Oncol 2020; 39:78.e17-78.e26. [PMID: 33127300 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the perioperative and morbidity outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN) in patients with short life expectancy (SLE) (≥95% 10-year expected mortality (10y-EM)), to assess the main predictors of outcomes in this population and to compare these results with those of a group at the opposite upper range with long LE (LLE, ≤5% 10y-EM) relying on a multicenter Italian prospective registry of kidney surgery (the RECORD 2 project). METHODS Clinical data of 4,325 patients undergone kidney surgery were collected at 26 urological Italian Centers from 2013 to 2016. SLE was defined as a ≥95% 10y-EM (assessed using the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index [CCI]). A multivariable logistic regression for overall postoperative complications, acute kidney injury (AKI), positive surgical margins (SM) and ∆ estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥25% at 2 years from surgery was performed in patients with SLE including clinically relevant variables. Adjusted outcomes reported as mean (SD) of the 2 groups were generated using separate multivariable logistic regression models and compared. RESULTS Overall, 559 patients with SLE were selected. Patients had an ASA score ≥3 in 58.4% of cases. A clinical T1a, T1b, and T2 stage was found in 412 (74.5%), 124 (22.4%), and 17 (3.1%) patients. The median PADUA score was 7 (6-8). Surgical and medical postoperative complication rates were registered in 14.8% and 6% cases. Postoperative AKI was reported in 27.3% cases, positive surgical margins (PSM) in 9.3% cases. In this subgroup of patients, ASA score, cerebrovascular disease, surgery in low volume centers, and open surgery were independent predictors of overall complications. ASA and PADUA scores, renal clamping, resection technique and lower eGFR at baseline were independent predictors of AKI. PADUA score, open approach and resection technique were independent predictors of PSM. Cardiovascular disease, hilar clamping, and resection technique were independent predictors of eGFR decrease >25% at 2 years from surgery. Patients with SLE were compared with those with LLE (n = 302). All analyzed parameters at baseline were significantly different among the groups with the exception of cancer laterality. After adjusting for several clinical variables, the SLE group had a significantly higher risk rate of adjusted overall postoperative complication rate compared to the LLE group (20.6% ± 0.36 vs. 9.9% ± 0.65, P < 0.0001), while the overall intraoperative complications (4.1% ±0.13 vs. 2.3% ± 0.23), overall postoperative major complications (3.8% ± 0.09 vs. 1.9% ± 0.14) adjusted AKI (24.2% ± 0.37 vs. 22.6% ± 0.92), positive surgical margins (8% ± 0.22 vs. 6.4% ± 0.49), and 2-year RF loss (13.4% ± 0.17 vs. 12.4% ± 0.74). CONCLUSION In selected patients with SLE, PN is feasible with an acceptable safety profile that is overall comparable to patients with no LE limitations. While a robotic approach and surgery performed in high volume centers could reduce the risk of complications, an off-clamp approach and a SE surgical technique may decrease the risk of postoperative AKI and of longer term eGFR decrease.
Collapse
|
9
|
Pecoraro A, Knipper S, Palumbo C, Rosiello G, Luzzago S, Tian Z, Shariat SF, Saad F, Briganti A, Fiori C, Porpiglia F, Karakiewicz PI. Assessment of other-cause mortality in localized renal cell carcinoma patients within 15 years: A population-based analysis. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:1506-1513. [PMID: 32812284 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Five-year other cause mortality (OCM) after nephrectomy for non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) should be marginal in properly selected surgical candidates. We examined 5-year OCM rates as a quality of care indicator for patient selection. MATERIALS AND METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1997-2011), we identified 59267 RCC patients treated with either radical (n = 27 804, 46.9%) or partial nephrectomy (n = 31 463, 53.1%). Temporal trends and multivariable Cox regression analyses assessed 5-year OCM. Data were stratified according to age group, year of diagnosis, race, marital status, gender, and socio-economic status. The overall OCM rates for the entire cohort at 5 years of follow-up was 4.7% and decreased from 9.4% to 5.6% over the study span (-3.8%, P < .001). The greatest decrease in 5-year OCM rates over time was recorded in patients >70 years (17.0%-9.6%, slope, -0.6%/y), as well as in African-Americans (12.0-6.2%; slope, -0.3%/y) and in males (8.9%-4.7%; slope, -0.3%, all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS An important OCM decrease was recorded over the study span. Nonetheless, further improvement may be accomplished, especially in African-Americans, unmarried and older individuals, who exhibited higher OCM rates than others. These three groups may represent ideal targets for better patient selection based on OCM considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Pecoraro
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.,Martini Klinik, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Urology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rosiello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.,Division of Urology, University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.,Division of Urology, University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
DuMontier C, Loh KP, Bain PA, Silliman RA, Hshieh T, Abel GA, Djulbegovic B, Driver JA, Dale W. Defining Undertreatment and Overtreatment in Older Adults With Cancer: A Scoping Literature Review. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2558-2569. [PMID: 32250717 PMCID: PMC7392742 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The terms undertreatment and overtreatment are often used to describe inappropriate management of older adults with cancer. We conducted a comprehensive scoping review of the literature to clarify the meanings behind the use of the terms. METHODS We searched PubMed (National Center for Biotechnology Information), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL (EBSCO) for titles and abstracts that included the terms undertreatment or overtreatment with regard to older adults with cancer. We included all types of articles, cancer types, and treatments. Definitions of undertreatment and overtreatment were extracted, and categories underlying these definitions were derived through qualitative analysis. Within a random subset of articles, C.D. and K.P.L. independently performed this analysis to determine final categories and then independently assigned these categories to assess inter-rater reliability. RESULTS Articles using the terms undertreatment (n = 236), overtreatment (n = 71), or both (n = 51) met criteria for inclusion in our review (n = 256). Only 14 articles (5.5%) explicitly provided formal definitions; for the remaining, we inferred the implicit definitions from the terms' surrounding context. There was substantial agreement (κ = 0.81) between C.D. and K.P.L. in independently assigning categories of definitions within a random subset of 50 articles. Undertreatment most commonly implied less than recommended therapy (148; 62.7%) or less than recommended therapy associated with worse outcomes (88; 37.3%). Overtreatment most commonly implied intensive treatment of an older adult in whom the harms of treatment outweigh the benefits (38; 53.5%) or intensive treatment of a cancer not expected to affect an older adult in his/her remaining lifetime (33; 46.5%). CONCLUSION Undertreatment and overtreatment of older adults with cancer are imprecisely defined concepts. We propose new, more rigorous definitions that account for both oncologic factors and geriatric domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clark DuMontier
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | | | - Tammy Hshieh
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Jane A. Driver
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Boston, MA
| | - William Dale
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Han J, Li Q, Li P, Wang S, Zhang R, Qiao Y, Song Q, Fu Z. Reassessment of American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Stage III Renal Cell Carcinoma With Nodal Involvement: Propensity Score Matched Analyses of a Large Population-Based Study. Front Oncol 2020; 10:365. [PMID: 32266145 PMCID: PMC7096477 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To assess the role of nodal involvement in stage III renal cell carcinoma (RCC) according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th staging system. We compared the survival outcomes of RCC patients with pT1-3N1M0 disease and those with pT3N0M0 or stage IV (stratified as pT4NanyM0 and pTanyNanyM1) disease in a large population-based cohort. Methods: A cohort of 3,112 eligible patients with RCC was identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, registered between January 2004 and December 2015. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The prognostic value of the modified stage for pT1-3N1M0 disease was assessed by nomogram-based analyses. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for potential baseline confounding. Results: Patients with pT1-3N1M0 disease showed similar survival outcomes (median OS 41.0 vs. 38.0 months, P = 0.77; CSS 45.0 vs. 39.0 months, P = 0.59) to pT4NanyM0 patients, whereas the significantly better survival outcome was found for pT3N0M0 patients. After PSM, comparable survival rates were observed between pT1-3N1M0 group and pT4NanyM0 group, which were still significantly worse than the survival of pT3N0M0 patients. The modified stage IIIA (pT3N0M0), IIIB (pT1-3N1M0, pT4NanyM0), and IV (pTanyNanyM1) showed higher predictive accuracy than AJCC stage system in the nomogram-based analyses (concordance index: 0.70 vs. 0.68, P < 0.001 for OS; 0.71 vs. 0.69, P < 0.001 for CSS). Conclusions: The pT1-3N1M0 RCC might be reclassified as stage IIIB together with pT4NanyM0 disease for better prediction of prognosis, further examination and validation are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Zhenming Fu
- Cancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hu Z, Li L, Cheng P, Liu Q, Zheng X, Peng F, Zhang Q. lncRNA MSC-AS1 activates Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway to modulate cell proliferation and migration in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma via miR-3924/WNT5A. J Cell Biochem 2020; 121:4085-4093. [PMID: 31916281 DOI: 10.1002/jcb.29594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) is the most general subtype of renal cell carcinoma, which composes about 1/20 of adult malignancies. The anomaly of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) expression is proved to mediate cancer progression of various types. The function and mediation mechanism of MSC-AS1 has rarely been detected in KIRC before. This study started with the mediation of MSC-AS1 on cell function. In this study, MSC-AS1 was dramatically upregulated in KIRC and correlated with dismal prognosis of KIRC patients. Knockdown of MSC-AS1 would suppress the proliferative and migratory properties of KIRC cells. MSC-AS1 was found to directly downregulate miR-3924 expression while miR-3924 directly downregulated WNT5A expression. Meanwhile, MSC-AS1 could promote the expression of WNT5A, indicating the existence of MSC-AS1/miR-3924/WNT5A. Further assays indicated that MSC-AS1 could enhance Wnt/β-catenin pathway. By means of rescue assays, the mediation of MSC-AS1/miR-3924/WNT5A/β-catenin axis on KIRC cell proliferation, migration and migration was verified. This study revealed that MSC-AS1 regulates KIRC cell proliferation and migration via miR-3924/WNT5A/β-catenin axis. MSC-AS1 might contribute to new strategies for KIRC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaoxiong Hu
- Department of Nephrology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Linhong Li
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Peng Cheng
- Department of Nephrology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Qin Liu
- Department of Neurology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Xuan Zheng
- Department of Nephrology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Feng Peng
- Department of Oncology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Qinghong Zhang
- Department of Nephrology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Silverman SG, Pedrosa I, Ellis JH, Hindman NM, Schieda N, Smith AD, Remer EM, Shinagare AB, Curci NE, Raman SS, Wells SA, Kaffenberger SD, Wang ZJ, Chandarana H, Davenport MS. Bosniak Classification of Cystic Renal Masses, Version 2019: An Update Proposal and Needs Assessment. Radiology 2019; 292:475-488. [PMID: 31210616 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 245] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Cystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is almost certainly overdiagnosed and overtreated. Efforts to diagnose and treat RCC at a curable stage result in many benign neoplasms and indolent cancers being resected without clear benefit. This is especially true for cystic masses, which compared with solid masses are more likely to be benign and, when malignant, less aggressive. For more than 30 years, the Bosniak classification has been used to stratify the risk of malignancy in cystic renal masses. Although it is widely used and still effective, the classification does not formally incorporate masses identified at MRI or US or masses that are incompletely characterized but are highly likely to be benign, and it is affected by interreader variability and variable reported malignancy rates. The Bosniak classification system cannot fully differentiate aggressive from indolent cancers and results in many benign masses being resected. This proposed update to the Bosniak classification addresses some of these shortcomings. The primary modifications incorporate MRI, establish definitions for previously vague imaging terms, and enable a greater proportion of masses to enter lower-risk classes. Although the update will require validation, it aims to expand the number of cystic masses to which the Bosniak classification can be applied while improving its precision and accuracy for the likelihood of cancer in each class.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart G Silverman
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| | - James H Ellis
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| | - Nicole M Hindman
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| | - Nicola Schieda
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| | - Andrew D Smith
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| | - Erick M Remer
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| | - Atul B Shinagare
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| | - Nicole E Curci
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| | - Steven S Raman
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| | - Shane A Wells
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| | - Samuel D Kaffenberger
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| | - Zhen J Wang
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| | - Hersh Chandarana
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| | - Matthew S Davenport
- From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.G.S., A.B.S.); Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma, Society of Abdominal Radiology, Houston, Tex (S.G.S., I.P., N.M.H., N.S., A.D.S., E.M.R., A.B.S., N.E.C., S.S.R., S.A.W., S.D.K., Z.J.W., H.C., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (I.P.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, B2-A209A, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (J.H.E., N.E.C., S.D.K., M.S.D.); Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (N.M.H., H.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada (N.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Ala (A.D.S.); Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (E.M.R.); Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Los Angeles, Calif (S.S.R.); Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wis (S.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Z.J.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lund JL, Kuo TM, Brookhart MA, Meyer AM, Dalton AF, Kistler CE, Wheeler SB, Lewis CL. Development and validation of a 5-year mortality prediction model using regularized regression and Medicare data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2019; 28:584-592. [PMID: 30891850 PMCID: PMC6519458 DOI: 10.1002/pds.4769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE De-implementation of low-value services among patients with limited life expectancy is challenging. Robust mortality prediction models using routinely collected health care data can enhance health care stakeholders' ability to identify populations with limited life expectancy. We developed and validated a claims-based prediction model for 5-year mortality using regularized regression methods. METHODS Medicare beneficiaries age 66 or older with an office visit and at least 12 months of pre-visit continuous Medicare A/B enrollment were identified in 2008. Five-year mortality was assessed through 2013. Secondary outcomes included 30-, 90-, and 180-day and 1-year mortality. Claims-based predictors, including comorbidities and indicators of disability, frailty, and functional impairment, were selected using regularized logistic regression, applying the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) in a random 80% training sample. Model performance was assessed and compared with the Gagne comorbidity score in the 20% validation sample. RESULTS Overall, 183 204 (24%) individuals died. In addition to demographics, 161 indicators of comorbidity and function were included in the final model. In the validation sample, the c-statistic was 0.825 (0.823-0.828). Median-predicted probability of 5-year mortality was 14%; almost 4% of the cohort had a predicted probability greater than 80%. Compared with the Gagne score, the LASSO model led to improved 5-year mortality classification (net reclassification index = 9.9%; integrated discrimination index = 5.2%). CONCLUSIONS Our claims-based model predicting 5-year mortality showed excellent discrimination and calibration, similar to the Gagne score model, but resulted in improved mortality classification. Regularized regression is a feasible approach for developing prediction tools that could enhance health care research and evaluation of care quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L. Lund
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of
North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Tzy-Mey Kuo
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of
North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - M. Alan Brookhart
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of
North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Anne-Marie Meyer
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- IQVIA, St. Prex, Switzerland
| | | | - Christine E. Kistler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of
North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, University of North
Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie B. Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of
North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of
North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Carmen L. Lewis
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver,
CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Griebling TL. Re: Contemporary Use of Partial Nephrectomy: Are Older Patients with Impaired Kidney Function Being Left Behind? J Urol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
16
|
Richard PO, Martin L, Lavallée LT, Violette PD, Komisarenko M, Evans AJ, Jain K, Jewett MAS, Finelli A. Identifying the use and barriers to the adoption of renal tumour biopsy in the management of small renal masses. Can Urol Assoc J 2018; 12:260-266. [PMID: 29629862 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Renal tumour biopsies (RTBs) can provide the histology of small renal masses (SRMs) prior to treatment decision-making. However, many urologists are reluctant to use RTB as a standard of care. This study characterizes the current use of RTB in the management of SRMs and identifies barriers to a more widespread adoption. METHODS A web-based survey was sent to members of the Canadian and Quebec Urological Associations who had registered email address (n=767) in June 2016. The survey examined physicians' practice patterns, RTB use, and potential barriers to RTB. Chi-squared tests were used to assess for differences between respondents. RESULTS The response rate was 29% (n=223), of which 188 respondents were eligible. A minority of respondents (12%) perform RTB in >75% of cases, while 53% never perform or perform RTB in <25% of cases. Respondents with urological oncology fellowship training were more likely to request a biopsy than their colleagues without such training. The most frequent management-related reason for not using routine RTB was a belief that biopsy won't alter management, while the most frequent pathology-related reason was the risk of obtaining a false-negative or a non-diagnostic biopsy. CONCLUSIONS Adoption of RTBs remains low in Canada. Concerns about the accuracy of RTB and its ability to change clinical practice are the largest barriers to adoption. A knowledge translation strategy is needed to address these concerns. Future studies are also required in order to define where RTB is most valuable and how to best to implement it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick O Richard
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du CHUS and the University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Lisa Martin
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Luke T Lavallée
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Philippe D Violette
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Woodstock General Hospital and Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Maria Komisarenko
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew J Evans
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kunal Jain
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Antonio Finelli
- Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bhatt NR, Davis NF, Breen K, Flood HD, Giri SK. Life expectancy calculation in urology: Are we equitably treating older patients? Cent European J Urol 2018; 70:368-371. [PMID: 29410887 PMCID: PMC5791409 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Revised: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of our study was to determine the contemporary practice in the utilization of life expectancy (LE) calculations among urological clinicians. Material and methods Members of the Irish Society of Urology (ISU) and the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) completed a questionnaire on LE utilization in urological practice. Results The survey was delivered to 1251 clinicians and the response rate was 17% (n = 208/1251). The majority (61%, n = 127) of urologists were aware of methods available for estimated LE calculation.Seventy-one percent (n = 148) had never utilized LE analysis in clinical practice and 81% (n = 170) routinely used 'eyeballing' (empiric prediction) for estimating LE. Life expectancy tables were utilized infrequently (12%, n = 25) in making the decision for treatment in the setting of multi-disciplinary meetings. Conclusions LE is poorly integrated into treatment decision-making; not only for the management of urological patients but also in the multidisciplinary setting. Further education and awareness regarding the importance of LE is vital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita R Bhatt
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Niall F Davis
- Department of Urology, Tallaght Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kieran Breen
- Department of Urology, Limerick Regional Hopsital, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Hugh D Flood
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Subhasis K Giri
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Welch HG, Skinner JS, Schroeck FR, Zhou W, Black WC. Regional Variation of Computed Tomographic Imaging in the United States and the Risk of Nephrectomy. JAMA Intern Med 2018; 178:221-227. [PMID: 29279887 PMCID: PMC5838611 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE While computed tomography (CT) represents a tremendous advance in diagnostic imaging, it also creates the problem of incidental detection-the identification of tumors unrelated to the clinical symptoms that initiate the test. OBJECTIVE To determine the geographic variation in the United States in CT imaging and the corresponding association with one of the most consequential sequelae of incidental detection: nephrectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This study is a cross-sectional analysis of age-, sex-, and race-adjusted Medicare data (January 2010-December 2014) from 306 hospital referral regions (HRRs) in the United States and includes information from 15 million fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries age 65 to 85 years. EXPOSURES Regional CT risk (ie, the proportion of the population receiving either a chest or abdominal CT over 5 years). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Five-year risk of nephrectomy (partial or total). RESULTS Data from 15 million fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries age 65 to 85 years were gathered and illustrate that 43% of Medicare beneficiaries age 65 to 85 years received either a chest or abdominal CT from January 2010 to December 2014. This risk varied across the HRRs, ranging from 31% in Santa Cruz, California, to 52% in Sun City, Arizona. Increased regional CT risk was associated with a higher nephrectomy risk (r = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.28-0.47), particularly among HRRs with more than 50 000 beneficiaries (r = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31-0.61). After controlling for HRR adult smoking rates, imaging an additional 1000 beneficiaries was associated with 4 additional nephrectomies (95% CI, 3-5). Case-fatality rates for those who underwent nephrectomy were 2.1% at 30 days and 4.3% at 90 days. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries are commonly exposed to CT imaging. Those residing in high-scanning regions face a higher risk of nephrectomy, presumably reflecting the incidental detection of renal masses. Additional surgery should be considered one of the risks of excessive CT imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Gilbert Welch
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.,Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.,Veterans Affairs Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont
| | - Jonathan S Skinner
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.,Department of Economics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Florian R Schroeck
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.,Veterans Affairs Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont.,Department of Surgery, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.,Urology Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont
| | - Weiping Zhou
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - William C Black
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.,Department of Radiology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abdollah F, Arora S, von Landenberg N, Gild P, Sood A, Dalela D, Trinh QD, Menon M, Rogers C. Testing the external validity of the EORTC randomized trial 30904 comparing overall survival after radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in contemporary North American patients with renal cell cancer. BJU Int 2017; 121:345-347. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.14039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute; Henry Ford Hospital; Detroit MI USA
| | - Sohrab Arora
- Vattikuti Urology Institute; Henry Ford Hospital; Detroit MI USA
| | | | - Philipp Gild
- Department of Urology; University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Akshay Sood
- Vattikuti Urology Institute; Henry Ford Hospital; Detroit MI USA
| | - Deepansh Dalela
- Vattikuti Urology Institute; Henry Ford Hospital; Detroit MI USA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School; Boston MA USA
| | - Mani Menon
- Vattikuti Urology Institute; Henry Ford Hospital; Detroit MI USA
| | - Craig Rogers
- Vattikuti Urology Institute; Henry Ford Hospital; Detroit MI USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Leppert JT, Mittakanti HR, Thomas IC, Lamberts RW, Sonn GA, Chung BI, Skinner EC, Wagner TH, Chertow GM, Brooks JD. Contemporary Use of Partial Nephrectomy: Are Older Patients With Impaired Kidney Function Being Left Behind? Urology 2016; 100:65-71. [PMID: 27634733 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2016] [Revised: 08/17/2016] [Accepted: 08/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether patient factors, such as age and preoperative kidney function, were associated with receipt of partial nephrectomy in a national integrated healthcare system. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified patients treated with a radical or partial nephrectomy from 2002 to 2014 in the Veterans Health Administration. We examined associations among patient age, sex, race or ethnicity, multimorbidity, baseline kidney function, tumor characteristics, and receipt of partial nephrectomy. We estimated the odds of receiving a partial nephrectomy and assessed interactions between covariates and the year of surgery to explore whether patient factors associated with partial nephrectomy changed over time. RESULTS In our cohort of 14,186 patients, 4508 (31.2%) received a partial nephrectomy. Use of partial nephrectomy increased from 17% in 2002 to 32% in 2008 and to 38% in 2014. Patient race or ethnicity, age, tumor stage, and year of surgery were independently associated with receipt of partial nephrectomy. Black veterans had significantly increased odds of receipt of partial nephrectomy, whereas older patients had significantly reduced odds. Partial nephrectomy utilization increased for all groups over time, but older patients and patients with worse baseline kidney function showed the least increase in odds of partial nephrectomy. CONCLUSION Although the utilization of partial nephrectomy increased for all groups, the greatest increase occurred in the youngest patients and those with the highest baseline kidney function. These trends warrant further investigation to ensure that patients at the highest risk of impaired kidney function are considered for partial nephrectomy whenever possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John T Leppert
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA; Stanford Kidney Cancer Research Program, Stanford, CA.
| | | | - I-Chun Thomas
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Remy W Lamberts
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Geoffrey A Sonn
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Stanford Kidney Cancer Research Program, Stanford, CA
| | - Benjamin I Chung
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Stanford Kidney Cancer Research Program, Stanford, CA
| | - Eila C Skinner
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Stanford Kidney Cancer Research Program, Stanford, CA
| | - Todd H Wagner
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA; Stanford Kidney Cancer Research Program, Stanford, CA
| | - Glenn M Chertow
- Stanford Kidney Cancer Research Program, Stanford, CA; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - James D Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Stanford Kidney Cancer Research Program, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tan HJ, Chamie K, Daskivich TJ, Litwin MS, Hu JC. Patient function, long-term survival, and use of surgery in patients with kidney cancer. Cancer 2016; 122:3776-3784. [PMID: 27518165 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2016] [Revised: 07/25/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beyond age and comorbidity, functionality can shape the long-term survival potential of patients with cancer. Accordingly, herein the authors compared mortality and receipt of cancer-directed surgery according to patient function among older adults with kidney cancer. METHODS Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 2000 through 2009, the authors studied 28,326 elderly subjects with primary kidney cancer. Patient function was quantified using function-related indicators, claims indicative of dysfunction and disability. Adjusting for patient and cancer characteristics, competing risk regression was used to assess the relationship between function-related indicator count and cause-specific mortality and then generalized estimating equations were used to quantify the probability of surgery. RESULTS A total of 13,619 adult patients (48.1%) with at least 1 function-related indicator were identified. A higher indicator category was associated with older age, greater comorbidity, female sex, unmarried status, lower socioeconomic status, and higher stage of disease (P<.001). Compared with patients with an indicator count of 0, those with an indicator count of 1 (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.04-1.16) and ≥2 (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.39-1.53) were found to have higher other-cause mortality. Conversely, kidney cancer mortality varied minimally with patient function. Patients with ≥ 2 indicators received cancer-directed surgery less often than those without disability (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.56-0.66), although treatment probabilities remained high for patients with locoregional disease and low for those with metastatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS Among older adults with kidney cancer, functional health stands as a significant predictor of long-term survival. However, receipt of cancer-directed surgery appears largely determined by cancer stage. Patient function should be considered more heavily when determining treatment for older adults with kidney cancer. Cancer 2016;122:3776-3784. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hung-Jui Tan
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Karim Chamie
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Mark S Litwin
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California at Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.,University of California at Los Angeles School of Nursing, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jim C Hu
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|