1
|
Perera M, Jibara G, Tin AL, Haywood S, Sjoberg DD, Benfante NE, Carlsson SV, Eastham JA, Laudone V, Touijer KA, Fine S, Scardino PT, Vickers AJ, Ehdaie B. Outcomes of Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Cancer on Initial Versus Confirmatory Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:662-668. [PMID: 36566100 PMCID: PMC10285029 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance (AS) is recommended as the preferred treatment for men with low-risk disease. In order to optimize risk stratification and exclude undiagnosed higher-grade disease, most AS protocols recommend a confirmatory biopsy. OBJECTIVE We aimed to compare outcomes among men with grade group (GG) 2/3 prostate cancer on initial biopsy with those among men whose disease was initially GG1 but was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We reviewed patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) in two cohorts: "immediate RP group," with GG2/3 cancer on diagnostic biopsy, and "AS group," with GG1 cancer on initial biopsy that was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Probabilities of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and salvage therapy were determined using multivariable Cox regression models with risk adjustment. Risks of adverse pathology at RP were also compared using logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The immediate RP group comprised 4009 patients and the AS group comprised 321 patients. The AS group had lower adjusted rates of adverse pathology (27% vs 35%, p = 0.003). BCR rates were lower in the AS group, although this did not reach conventional significance (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-1.06, p = 0.10) compared with the immediate RP group. Risk-adjusted 1- and 5-yr BCR rates were 4.6% (95% CI 3.0-6.5%) and 10.4% (95% CI 6.9-14%), respectively, for the AS group compared with 6.3% (95% CI 5.6-7.0%) and 20% (95% CI 19-22%), respectively, in the immediate RP group. A nonsignificant association was observed for salvage treatment-free survival favoring the AS group (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.42, 1.06, p = 0.087). CONCLUSIONS We found that men with GG1 cancer who were upgraded on confirmatory biopsy tend to have less aggressive disease than men with the same grade found at initial biopsy. These results must be confirmed in larger series before recommendations can be made regarding a more conservative approach in men with upgraded pathology on surveillance biopsy. PATIENT SUMMARY We studied men with low-risk prostate cancer who were initially eligible for active surveillance but presented with more aggressive cancer on confirmatory biopsy. We found that outcomes for these men were better than the outcomes for those diagnosed initially with more serious cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlon Perera
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ghalib Jibara
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy L Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samuel Haywood
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel D Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicole E Benfante
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sigrid V Carlsson
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - James A Eastham
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vincent Laudone
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karim A Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samson Fine
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter T Scardino
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sugano D, Abreu AL, Cacciamani GE, Gill IS, Lebastchi AH. Focal Therapy for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Opinion: No. J Endourol 2021; 35:1284-1287. [PMID: 33849324 DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dordaneh Sugano
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Andre Luis Abreu
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Giovanni E Cacciamani
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Inderbir S Gill
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Amir H Lebastchi
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Center for Image-Guided and Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vau N, Henriques V, Cheng L, Blanca A, Fonseca J, Montironi R, Cimadamore A, Lopez-Beltran A. Predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: the role of prognostic grade group and index tumor nodule. Hum Pathol 2019; 93:6-15. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
4
|
Kibel AS. Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer and Active Surveillance: Maximize Utilization while Minimizing Failure. J Urol 2017. [PMID: 28628758 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adam S Kibel
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|